Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Dec 7;17(12):e98643. doi: 10.7759/cureus.98643

Tumor Lysis Syndrome Induced by Hormonal Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Case Report

Marta Machado 1,, Margarida Mourato 1, Catarina Negrão 2, Carolina Rodrigues 1, João Tiago Serra 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12682335  PMID: 41362386

Abstract

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a life-threatening oncological emergency resulting from massive cellular destruction. Although most frequently associated with chemotherapy in hematologic malignancies, TLS is uncommon in solid tumors due to their typically slower proliferation rates and treatment response.

We report a case of a 67-year-old male with a history of untreated prostate cancer diagnosed two years earlier, who presented with abdominal pain, anorexia, and weight loss. Physical examination revealed painful hepatomegaly. Laboratory tests showed a cholestatic pattern, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Computed tomography (CT) revealed findings suggestive of pulmonary, hepatic, and adrenal metastases, multiple mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathies, and osteolytic bone lesions.

Despite the relatively modest increase in PSA levels compared to the extensive disease burden, repeat prostate biopsy confirmed a high-grade prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 9).

Hormone therapy with degarelix was initiated. On the third day after treatment initiation, the patient developed both laboratory and clinical features consistent with TLS, including hyperuricemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperkalemia, and acute kidney injury (Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) stage III). A mediastinal lymph node biopsy obtained via endobronchial ultrasound was subsequently performed but was inconclusive.

TLS management was initiated, which included aggressive intravenous hydration, hypouricemic therapy with rasburicase, and correction of electrolyte disturbances. No additional disease-directed therapy, namely, renal replacement therapy, was pursued, given the rapid clinical deterioration, extensive metastatic disease, and absence of feasible oncologic treatment options, with an overall poor prognosis. The patient ultimately died 17 days after the onset of TLS.

The literature consistently shows that TLS occurring after initiation of hormonal therapy, including gonadotropin-releasing hormone-axis interventions, is associated with extremely poor outcomes. In all reported treatment-related TLS cases in prostate cancer, mortality was universal despite aggressive supportive management.

This case illustrates a rare instance of TLS occurring after initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist therapy in metastatic prostate cancer, highlighting the need for careful risk assessment, close biochemical monitoring, and prompt recognition and management of TLS, especially in patients with high tumor burden.

Keywords: degarelix, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, hormonal therapy, prostate cancer, tumor lysis syndrome

Introduction

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is an oncologic emergency resulting from massive tumor cell destruction and subsequent release of potassium, phosphate, and nucleic acids, leading to hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, and hypocalcemia. These electrolyte disturbances can cause acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmias, and neurologic complications, including seizures [1,2].

According to the Cairo-Bishop criteria, TLS is defined by the presence of at least two laboratory criteria (hyperuricemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperkalemia, or hypocalcemia) occurring within three days before or seven days after the initiation of oncologic therapy, together with at least one clinical manifestation (acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmia, or seizure) [3].

The rate of malignant cell lysis increases significantly after the initiation of antitumor therapy, accounting for the predominance of therapy-related TLS. In rapidly proliferating tumors, particularly hematologic malignancies, TLS may also occur spontaneously.

TLS is uncommon in solid tumors, with approximately 130 cases reported to date. Specifically in prostate cancer, only 10 cases have been documented - three spontaneous and seven therapy-related [4-6]. All occurred in the context of metastatic disease, and only one was associated with hormonal therapy [7].

Prostate cancer may present biological features that increase susceptibility to TLS, including high tumor burden and rapid tumor dedifferentiation. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists produce an abrupt suppression of androgen signaling, which can trigger sudden and extensive tumor cell apoptosis. This rapid cellular breakdown can overwhelm metabolic pathways and precipitate TLS in patients with advanced disease.

We present a rare case of TLS secondary to treatment with a GnRH antagonist in a patient with advanced metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma. This case underscores the importance of careful risk stratification before initiating hormonal therapy, as well as close clinical vigilance and biochemical monitoring in patients with a high disease burden.

This case was previously presented as a poster at the European Congress of Internal Medicine, Florence, Italy, in March 2025.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old male smoker, with a medical history of prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 7) diagnosed two years earlier in another hospital, who declined further medical follow-up, and therefore was under no active oncologic therapy, presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain, anorexia, and weight loss. He denied fever, respiratory, urinary, or gastrointestinal symptoms.

On admission, physical examination revealed abdominal distension with painful hepatomegaly. Laboratory tests showed mild anemia (hemoglobin (Hb) = 12.5 g/dL), elevated cholestatic liver pattern without hyperbilirubinemia (alkaline phosphatase (ALP) = 435 U/L, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) = 462 U/L, total bilirubin = 1.02 mg/dL), hyperuricemia (8.2 mg/dL), and markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH = 3308 U/L) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR = 103 mm/h). The total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was also elevated (74 ng/mL). Renal function, coagulation profile, and other serum electrolytes were within the normal range upon admission. Blood cultures and HIV serology were also negative.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis revealed findings suggestive of pulmonary, hepatic, and adrenal metastases, along with multiple supraclavicular, mediastinal, hilar, periaortic, and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathies. A solid pelvic mass measuring 3.5 × 3.0 cm, suggestive of metastatic implantation, was also identified, as well as osteolytic bone lesions. These findings are illustrated in Figures 1, 2.

Figure 1. Thoracic CT showing multiple mediastinal lymphadenopathies, including a right paratracheal node measuring approximately 20 mm.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Abdominal CT scan revealing an enlarged liver with multiple heterogeneous hypodense lesions consistent with extensive hepatic metastasis.

Figure 2

The patient was admitted for investigation of a primary neoplasm with pulmonary, hepatic, and adrenal metastases. The most likely diagnosis considered was stage IV prostate carcinoma, despite the relatively modest increase in PSA levels compared to the extensive disease burden. During hospitalization, a prostate biopsy was performed and confirmed adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 9 (4+5). Mediastinal lymph node sampling was performed via endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) to characterize the primary neoplasm, targeting stations 11L, 2R, and 4R with two passes at each site. Although liver biopsy was considered, EBUS-TBNA was chosen because it allowed more immediate tissue acquisition. A PET/CT scan had also been requested, but it was not performed before the patient’s clinical deterioration. Histopathological examination of the mediastinal lymph node biopsy revealed carcinoma of indeterminate origin, with immunohistochemistry negative for PSA, racemase, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), and melan-A. Immunophenotyping of mediastinal lymph nodes and peripheral blood was also negative. Despite the inconclusive immunohistochemical profile, dedifferentiated metastatic prostate carcinoma was considered the most likely diagnosis based on clinical and radiologic correlation.

Hormonal therapy with degarelix was subsequently initiated (240 mg subcutaneously) on the fifth day of admission.

On the third day after degarelix administration, the patient exhibited clinical deterioration with marked prostration, accompanied by laboratory evidence of hyperuricemia (13 mg/dL), hyperphosphatemia (6.5 mg/dL), hyperkalemia (5.5 mmol/L), and acute kidney injury, classified as Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) stage III (creatinine = 5.0 mg/dL) (Table 1).

Table 1. Evolution of laboratory parameters during admission and before and after degarelix administration.

INR: international normalized ratio; APTT: activated partial thromboplastin time; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; PSA: prostate-specific antigen.

  Reference values Pre-hormonal therapy 3 days after hormonal therapy 5 days after hormonal therapy
Hematology        
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 13.0-17.0 12.5 11.1 11.0
Hematocrit (%) 40-50 36.3 32.8 33.3
Mean cell volume (fL) 78-96 85.8 88.9 90.7
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (pg) 27-32 29.6 30.1 30.0
Leukocytes (x10^9/L) 4.0-10.0 11.8 13.4 12.9
Neutrophils (x10^9/L) 1.8-6.9 8.9 10.7 10.6
Lymphocytes (x10^9/L) 1.2-3.3 1.8 1.5 1.4
Platelet count (x10^9/L) 150-410 384 357 324
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm) <13 103    
Coagulation        
Prothrombin time (sec) 9.7-11.8 13.5 14.7 14.8
INR <1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
APTT (sec) 20.6-29.5 24.7 27.9 26.4
Biochemistry        
AST (U/L) <40 111 225 1126
ALT (U/L) <40 47 60 213
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) 40-130 435 612 652
GGT (UI/L) <60 462 680 595
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) <1.2 1.02 1.3 1.3
Potassium (mmol/L) 3.5-5.1 4.1 5.5 4.6
Phosphorus (mg/dL) 2.5-4.5 4 6.5 5
Total calcium (mg/dL) 8.8-10.2 8.5 8.5 8.8
Uric acid (mg/dL) 3.4-7 8,2 13 <0.2
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) 132-225 3469 4730 14613
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.7-1.2 1.14 5.1 2.9
BUN (mg/dL) <50 47 130 141
Total PSA (ng/mL) <4.5 74.2    

Based on these findings, a diagnosis of TLS secondary to hormonal therapy was established. Aggressive intravenous hydration was initiated, along with rasburicase (0.2 mg/kg) and correction of electrolyte abnormalities.

It was determined that renal replacement therapy was not required at that stage, given the improvement of hyperuricemia after rasburicase administration and preserved diuresis following intensified hydration.

Despite supportive measures, the patient experienced progressive clinical deterioration with severe hepatic failure and marked encephalopathy. Given the absence of feasible oncologic treatment options, the high burden of plurimetastatic disease, and the overall poor prognosis, a multidisciplinary assessment with the oncology and intensive care teams determined that further invasive interventions would not be beneficial. The patient, unfortunately, died 17 days after the onset of TLS.

Discussion

TLS occurs most frequently in hematologic malignancies due to their high proliferative rate and sensitivity to cytotoxic therapy [8]. TLS is uncommon in solid tumors, but it has been documented in metastatic prostate cancer.

Several risk factors have been associated with the development of TLS, including elevated LDH and uric acid levels, chronic kidney disease, extensive metastatic burden, and tumors with high proliferative activity. Recognizing these factors is crucial, as their presence may warrant prophylactic measures prior to initiating antitumor therapy, including vigorous intravenous hydration to promote renal excretion, the use of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (e.g., allopurinol) or urate oxidase agents (e.g., rasburicase) to prevent hyperuricemia, and frequent monitoring of electrolytes and renal function [1].

In addition to primary prevention, early diagnosis and prompt treatment of TLS are critical to reducing morbidity and preventing life-threatening complications, such as severe electrolyte disturbances, acute kidney injury, and cardiac arrhythmias.

In this case, several factors likely contributed to the development of TLS. The patient presented with extensive metastatic disease and markedly elevated LDH, both recognized predictors of TLS. Furthermore, the histopathological findings suggested tumor dedifferentiation, indicating increased cellular turnover [4]. Degarelix induces rapid suppression of androgen signaling, potentially triggering abrupt tumor cell apoptosis in highly proliferative metastatic disease, precipitating TLS [9-10].

To date, 10 cases of TLS associated with prostate cancer have been reported in the literature, including three spontaneous and seven therapy-related, all occurring in the context of metastatic disease [4]. Among the therapy-related cases, only one has previously been attributed to hormonal therapy with goserelin acetate, in which the patient required dialysis and intensive intravenous hydration, but despite these measures, the clinical course was fatal [4,7].

The literature consistently shows that TLS occurring after initiation of hormonal therapy is associated with extremely poor outcomes. In all documented treatment-related TLS cases in prostate cancer, mortality was universal despite timely recognition and aggressive supportive management [4].

The present report represents the second documented case of TLS secondary to hormonal therapy and the first associated specifically with the GnRH antagonist degarelix.

Conclusions

TLS secondary to hormonal therapy, although rare, is a potential complication in metastatic prostate cancer, particularly in the presence of high tumor burden and rapid treatment response. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for TLS when initiating systemic therapy, including hormonal agents, in patients with extensive metastatic disease and elevated LDH levels. This case reinforces the importance of clinical vigilance, careful risk stratification before starting hormonal therapy, and close biochemical monitoring in high-risk patients.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Marta Machado, Catarina Negrão, Carolina Rodrigues, João Tiago Serra

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Marta Machado, Margarida Mourato

Drafting of the manuscript:  Marta Machado, Margarida Mourato, Catarina Negrão

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Marta Machado, Margarida Mourato, Carolina Rodrigues, João Tiago Serra

Supervision:  Margarida Mourato

References

  • 1.Tumour lysis syndrome: new therapeutic strategies and classification. Cairo MS, Bishop M. Br J Haematol. 2004;127:3–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The tumor lysis syndrome. Howard SC, Jones DP, Pui CH. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1844–1854. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0904569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Recommendations for the evaluation of risk and prophylaxis of tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) in adults and children with malignant diseases: an expert TLS panel consensus. Cairo MS, Coiffier B, Reiter A, Younes A. Br J Haematol. 2010;149:578–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tumor lysis syndrome in patients with solid tumors: a systematic review of reported cases. Alqurashi RM, Tamim HH, Alsubhi ZD, Alzahrani AA, Tashkandi E. Cureus. 2022;14:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fatal acute tumor lysis syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy and flare phenomenon following combined androgen blockade. Tanvetyanon T, Choudhury AM. J Urol. 2004;171:1627. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000115884.21275.f4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fatal spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome in a patient with metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancer. Lin CJ, Hsieh RK, Lim KH, Chen HH, Cheng YC, Wu CJ. South Med J. 2007;100:916–917. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318137a665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tumor lysis syndrome in anti-androgen-treated metastatic prostate cancer. Mazzoni S. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48:1837–1838. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1369-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tumor lysis syndrome in solid tumors: an up to date review of the literature. Mirrakhimov AE, Ali AM, Khan M, Barbaryan A. Rare Tumors. 2014;6:5389. doi: 10.4081/rt.2014.5389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors in prostate cancer: molecular aspects and biological functions. Fontana F, Marzagalli M, Montagnani Marelli M, Raimondi M, Moretti RM, Limonta P. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:9511. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Experience with degarelix in the treatment of prostate cancer. Shore ND. Ther Adv Urol. 2013;5:11–24. doi: 10.1177/1756287212461048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES