Skip to main content
. 2002 Oct;15(4):716–746. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.4.716-746.2002

TABLE 4.

Laboratory phenotypic features of the 12 most clinically important species of nonpigmented or late-pigmenting RGMa

Species or complex Prior designations Pigment 3-Day aryl- sulfatase Nitrate reduction Iron uptake Utilization of:
5% NaCl Unique PRA (hsp65)
Mannitol Inositol Citrate Sorbitol
M. chelonae-abscessus group
    M. abscessus M. chelonae subsp. abscessus + + +
    M. chelonae M. borstelense, M. chelonei, M. chelonae subsp. chelonae + + +
    M. immunogenum M. immunogen + +
M. fortuitum group
    M. fortuitum M. ranae, M. fortuitum biovar fortuitum + + + + +
    M. peregrinum (type 1) M. fortuitum biovar peregrinum (pipemidic acid susceptible) + + + + + c
    M. peregrinum (type 2) M. fortuitum biovar peregrinum (pipemidic acid resistant) + + + + + c
M. fortuitum third biovariant complex
    M. houstonense (proposed) M. fortuitum third biovar sorbitol positive + + + + + + + c
    M. bonickei (proposed) M. fortuitum third biovar sorbitol negative + + + + + + c
M. mucogenicum MCLO + ± b + + +
M. smegmatis group
    M. smegmatis sensu stricto M. smegmatis ± + + + + ± + + +
    M. wolinskyi M. smegmatis + + + + ± + + +
    M. goodii M. smegmatis ± + + + + ± + + +
a

Modified from reference 188. Symbols: ±, variable or late; +, ≥90%; −, ≤10%; ±, 11 to 89%.

b

Tan appearance.

c

M. peregrinum (type 1) has the same PRA pattern as the proposed M. bonickei (M. fortuitum third biovariant, sorbitol negative), whereas M. peregrinum (type 2) has the same PRA pattern as the proposed M. houstonense (M. fortuitum third biovariant, sorbitol positive). Biochemical testing is necessary for differentiation of these species and taxa.