Abstract
Objective
Volumes of the hippocampus and amygdala, both major hubs for neural stress regulation amongst others, are associated with social stressors, cortisol awakening response (CAR) and sex. Importantly, the interplay of these different factors in affecting the morphology of both brain regions remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the intricate influence of these factors on grey matter volumes (GMV) of the hippocampus and amygdala.
Methods
We analyzed associations between structural brain data, self-reported chronic social stress (including subscales on social tension, social overload, lack of social recognition and social isolation) and CAR of 83 healthy participants (40 females) with multiple regression analyses.
Results
In males, but not females, higher levels of social tension were associated with lower bilateral hippocampal GMV. Amygdala GMV was related to CAR and social stress, with social overload being associated with reduced amygdala GMV in individuals not showing the typical CAR (reflecting a blunted physiological response to awakening), while the opposite pattern emerged in those with a typical CAR.
Conclusions
The association between chronic social stress and HC and AMY volume is interacting with CAR-pattern and sex. The brain morphology in males and in individuals with an atypical CAR showed reductions in association with chronic social stress. Our findings point to a complex interaction between social stress, cortisol patterns, sex and brain architecture, which needs to be assessed in more detail in future research.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-025-00801-9.
Keywords: Hippocampus, Amygdala, Gray matter volume, Sex difference, Cortisol awakening response, Social stress
Plain language summary
The hippocampus and the amygdala are two important brain regions that help us cope with stress. How everyday social stress, biological stress responses, and sex work together to influence these brain regions is still not well understood.
In our study, we investigated 83 healthy adults, including both women and men. We measured how much social stress people reported in their daily lives, such as feeling tense in social situations, feeling overwhelmed by social demands, or lacking social recognition and support. We also measured the “cortisol awakening response,” which is the typical rise in the stress hormone cortisol that happens shortly after waking up in the morning. We then examined how these factors are related to the size of the hippocampus and amygdala using brain scans.
We found that men who reported higher levels of social tension had smaller hippocampus volumes, while this was not observed in women. People whose cortisol did not rise after awakening - a pattern indicated an “atypical cortisol awakening response” - showed smaller amygdala volumes when they experienced too many social responsibilities and interactions. Those subjects with a typical cortisol pattern after awakening showed the opposite effect. These results suggest that in men and in individuals with an atypical cortisol response the negative association between chronic social stress and brain structures is stronger.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-025-00801-9.
Highlights
Social stress-related brain changes are associated with sex and HPA axis.
Social tension is linked to reduced hippocampus volume in males but not in females.
Social overload is associated with reduced amygdala in subjects with a lower CAR.
Maladaptive HPA axis function may increase the negative effects of social stress.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-025-00801-9.
Introduction
Stress reactivity involves a distributed neural circuitry, with key brain regions including the hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex playing central roles in adaptive responses to stressful situations [44, 45, 52]. However, when stress is prolonged, such as in chronic social stress, these regions, particularly the hippocampus and the amygdala, are adversely affected [18, 45]. Structural reductions in these areas have been observed in rats exposed to repeated social defeats [54], as well as in humans subjected to early-life stress [23] and stress within the past months [55, 73, 83]. Furthermore, reductions in their volumes are linked to stress-associated disorders, such as depression [53] and post-traumatic stress disorder [16]. These findings emphasize the importance of the hippocampus and the amygdala in stress responses and indicate their vulnerability to chronic stress exposure.
Both brain regions are significantly influenced by glucocorticoids (primarily cortisol in humans), due to their high density of gluco- and mineralocorticoid receptors [15, 75]. Cortisol regulates the stress response by binding to these receptors, a process closely linked to the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which controls cortisol secretion through a cascade of responses [27]. In healthy individuals, cortisol exhibits a distinct circadian rhythm, characterized by a significant increase in cortisol levels around 30–45 min after awakening in the morning, the so-called cortisol awakening response (CAR), which is then followed by a subsequent decline over the day [58]. Chronic stress is known to disrupt this pattern, leading to a reduced increase in cortisol after awakening [17], possibly due to prolonged activation of the HPA axis, which impairs the ability to respond adaptively after awakening. This atypical CAR pattern is thought to reflect impaired neuroendocrine function and a dysregulated circadian rhythm [71], which is further related to brain atrophy and reduced volumes of the hippocampus [59].
Research reports sex differences in reaction to social stress. Females show, e.g., greater response to social rejection [72] and are more susceptible to exhaustion from social media overload compared to males [81]. Furthermore, a review by Gray et al. [22] assessing the associations between glucocorticoids and sex hormones such as estradiol or testosterone with stress-induced brain changes further emphasizes the importance of considering sex as an impacting factor on stress-related brain regions. Evidence from animal studies demonstrates consistent results: In males, chronic stress, induced by chronic restraint task, causes dendritic atrophy in the hippocampus and the amygdala, whereas females do not show the same pattern [19, 40], unless they are ovariectomized (i.e., significantly decreased estradiol levels) [47, 48]. This suggests that sex hormones may attenuate the effects of chronic stress on hippocampus dendritic atrophy [14, 46]. In humans, sex-dependent associations between stress-induced cortisol levels and striatal-limbic structures were reported, with positive associations observed in males and negative ones in females [26]. Additionally, females were observed to have greater functional connectivity within the amygdala network in response to social exclusion compared to males [10]; and males showed more pronounced neural activation in the inferior frontal gyrus and insula [36]. In stress-related mental disorders, sex differences appeared with an atypical, reduced CAR going along with smaller left hippocampus volumes in male patients with first-episode psychosis and smaller bilateral hippocampus volumes in high-risk individuals, whereas this association was not seen in females [59, 60]. So far, it remains unclear whether similar sex-specific patterns between CAR and volumes of stress-regulating brain areas such as the hippocampus and the amygdala appear in healthy individuals as well.
Taken together, the interplay between chronic social stress and CAR on hippocampus and amygdala volumes, as well as the effect of sex on the relationship between chronic social stress, CAR and these brain structures remain unclear. Thus, the current study aims to explore interactions between chronic social stress, CAR, and sex affecting grey matter volume (GMV) of the hippocampus and the amygdala. More specifically, we exploratively assessed whether the following variables were associated with the GMV of the hippocampus and amygdala: (1) the interaction between chronic social stress and CAR; (2) the interaction of chronic social stress and sex; and (3) the interaction of sex and CAR. Our hypotheses are as follows: (1) individuals with lower CAR experiencing high chronic social stress will show reduced GMV of the hippocampus and the amygdala, potentially due to their deficient HPA axis regulation [71]; (2) in males, but not in females, higher chronic social stress will be associated with lower GMV in the hippocampus and amygdala [19, 40]; and (3) in males, but not in females, a lower CAR will be associated with reduced hippocampus volumes [59, 60].
Methods
Sample
Participants were part of a multi-center study [35, 36], recruited through public advertisements at the University of Tuebingen and the RWTH Aachen University, Germany, and were between 18 and 35 years of age. Eligibility for the study was evaluated through a semi-structured interview and the screening version of the German Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID, Wittchen et al. [79]. Inclusion criteria were right-handedness, nonsmokers, normal weight (17 < BMI < 30), a regular day-night cycle (no shift working, jet lag). Exclusion criteria included any self-reported history of neurological or mental disorders, pregnancy, as well as common requirements for MRI scanning, such as no metal parts in or on the body, tattoos, pacemakers, etc. Additionally, only females using oral contraceptives were included during their pill-intake phase to minimize the impact of hormonal fluctuations on cortisol reactivity [32]. Participants completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, Spielberger et al. [70] and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI, Beck [5, 30], to assess their anxiety and depression levels.
Of note, the term “sex” used throughout this paper refers to the biological sex assigned at birth, as reported by participants, and is categorized as female or male in accordance with the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines [25].
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of the medical faculties at the RWTH Aachen University (EK 212/16) and the University of Tuebingen (409/2015BO2), and was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki [80]. This work is published as a preprint on bioRxiv (DOI: 10.1101/2025.03.20.644300).
Cortisol collection
Saliva samples were collected on a normal working-day with a typical daily routine using Cortisol Salivettes (Sarstedt, Nürnbrecht, Germany) immediately after awakening, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min post-awakening. Participants received detailed instructions during the screening appointment a few days before the MR session and returned the samples when they came for the MR session. Participants placed a synthetic fiber swab in their mouth for one minute to absorb saliva and were told not to chew the swab. Participants recorded the exact time of each sample collection to ensure adherence to the timing protocol. They were instructed not to brush their teeth, drink, eat or smoke prior to the sampling procedures, to abstain from alcohol and nicotine consumption and excessive exercise on the day before sample collection, and to maintain their usual waking times and daily routines on the sampling day. After collection, participants stored the samples in a fridge and brought them to the laboratory in the afternoon of the same day, when the MR-scanning and the assessment of chronic social stress took place. The samples were kept in the refrigerator or freezer until they were sent for analysis to the Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tuebingen.
Salivary cortisol was measured using a liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry assay. Samples preparation involved: thawing at 4 °C, protein precipitation, solid-phase extraction using Oasis PRIME hydrophilic-lipophilic balance material on a 96-well plate, drying under nitrogen, and reconstituting in 50 µL of a methanol-water solution (30:70; v/v) in a sealed 96-well collection plate. Chromatographic separation was performed using a MicroLC 200 Plus instrument (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA), with analyte detection carried out on a QTRAP 4500 triple-quadrupole mass-spectrometer (Sciex) in negative ionization mode. For accurate quantification, a surrogate calibrant method using Cortisol-d4 in a true saliva matrix was employed. The method demonstrated a linear range for cortisol quantification from 0.062 to 75.5 ng/mL and was validated in accordance with FDA guidelines.
Chronic social stress
To assess chronic social stress levels, we investigated subscales of the Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress (TICS, Schulz et al. [66, 67], assessing stress resulting from high social demands or a lack of social need satisfaction appearing within the previous 3-months: “social overload” (the feeling of being overwhelmed due to the number and intensity of social interactions and responsibilities); “lack of social recognition” (not receiving sufficient appreciation or recognition from others in social situations); “social tension” (conflicts and tense interactions in social networks); and “social isolation” (feelings of loneliness and isolation from others).
MRI data acquisition and pre-processing
For structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the brain, participants were scanned with a T1-weighted magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence. The acquisition parameters were as follows: TR = 5,000 ms, TE = 2.98 ms, flip angle = 9◦, FOV = 256 × 256 mm, 176 slices, voxel size = 1 mm3, interleaved, with a distance factor of 50%.
The preprocessing of T1-weighted images was performed by using the Computational Anatomy Toolbox (CAT12, https://neuro-jena.github.io/cat/), the Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM12, https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) and MATLAB R2023a (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA, https://uk.mathworks.com/). The cross-sectional data segmentation tool was run with the default settings provided by CAT12. Each participant’s T1-weighted image underwent spatial normalization and segmentation into grey matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). These images were normalized to a standard stereotactic space (MNI template), with a resulting voxel size of 2 mm for the normalized images. After preprocessing, the modulated and normalized GMV images for each participant were smoothed by an 8 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) isotropic Gaussian kernel.
For region of interest (ROI) analyses, masks were created based on the neuromorphometrics atlas using the Image Calculator tool in SPM12. The location of the ROIs in this study is shown in Fig. 1. GMVs were extracted from the left and right hippocampus, and the left and right amygdala by “get_totals script, G. Ridgeway, http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/gridgway/vbm/get_totals.m, date of access: June 27, 2023”, as done in a previous study [56].
Fig. 1.
Regions of interest in MNI space at coordinate X = 27, Y = −7, Z = −22
Statistical analyses
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29 (https://www.ibm.com/de-de/products/spss-statistics). Based on established criteria, participants were categorized into responders and non-responders according to their cortisol increase at 30 min after awakening. Responders showed a cortisol increase of more than 50% from baseline to 30 min post-awakening, while non-responders showed an increase of less than 50% [13, 82].
Multiple regression analyses were performed to examine whether chronic social stress, CAR and sex are predictive of GMV. Separate analyses were conducted for the left and right hippocampus and amygdala as dependent variables. For each side of each ROI, four different models were applied corresponding to four subscales of chronic social stress. The predictors in the regression model were sex (females/males), CAR (responders/non-responders), chronic social stress level, and their interactions (chronic social stress × sex; chronic social stress × CAR; sex × CAR). Total intracranial volume (TIV) and age were included as covariates of no interest in each model. In cases where significant interactions were identified, partial correlation analyses were performed, controlling for TIV and age, to clarify the associations within each group. To reduce multicollinearity, chronic social stress scores were mean-centered. The CAR group and sex were dummy-coded. To control for multiple comparisons, p-values were adjusted using false-discovery-rate (FDR).
Results
Sample characteristics
A total of 83 participants (40 females) were included in the current study based on the data availability within the original database. Of these, 45 participants (22 females) were classified as responders and 38 participants (18 females) as non-responders according to the increasing levels of cortisol after awakening. Consequently, responders showed higher area under the curve with respect to the increase (AUCi) in the CAR compared to non-responders (t(81) = 3.63, p < 0.001), aligned with the classification criteria. No other significant differences were shown between groups. Moreover, results of the chi-square test indicated that there was no significant difference in the distribution of CAR responders and non-responders between females and males (χ² = 0.019, p = 0.99). Additionally, males were older compared to females (t(81) = 2.14, p = 0.035), and as expected and in accordance with the literature, males exhibited a larger TIV than females (t(81) = 8.653, p < 0.001). No further significant sex differences in sample characteristics were observed. Please see Table 1 for details.
Table 1.
Sample characteristics
| Overall (N = 83) |
Females (N = 40) |
Males (N = 43) |
P 1 | Responders (N = 45) |
Non-responders (N = 38) |
P 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 23.22 ± 3.11 | 22.48 ± 2.56 | 23.91 ± 3.43 | 0.035 | 22.64 ± 2.98 | 23.89 ± 3.16 | 0.068 |
| BDI-II | 2.99 ± 3.34 | 2.83 ± 3.45 | 3.14 ± 3.26 | 0.671 | 3.04 ± 3.46 | 2.92 ± 3.22 | 0.868 |
| STAI-State | 43.41 ± 7.03 | 44.24 ± 7.50 | 42.66 ± 6.57 | 0.323 | 42.45 ± 7.08 | 44.53 ± 6.89 | 0.195 |
| STAI-Trait | 33.61 ± 7.78 | 33.73 ± 7.26 | 33.50 ± 8.34 | 0.897 | 33.16 ± 7.11 | 34.13 ± 8.56 | 0.576 |
| Cortisol after awakening (ng/mL) | |||||||
| CAR - AUCg | 475.96 ± 655.17 | 517.64 ± 754.39 | 438.17 ± 556.65 | 0.679 | 450.69 ± 592.72 | 506.70 ± 731.20 | 0.703 |
| CAR - AUCi | 114.99 ± 304.86 | 117.08 ± 243.41 | 113.08 ± 354.43 | 0.367 | 218.32 ± 345.52 | −10.69 ± 183.34 | < 0.001 |
| Awakening time (a.m.) | 7:27 ± 1:11 | 7:16 ± 1:13 | 7:41 ± 1:07 | 0.190 | 7:15 ± 1:05 | 7.43 ± 1:12 | 0.051 |
| Sleep duration (hours) | 7.68 ± 1.22 | 7.87 ± 1.24 | 7.45 ± 1.17 | 0.132 | 7.60 ± 1.13 | 7.57 ± 1.23 | 0.917 |
| Chronic social stress | |||||||
| Social overload | 7.00 ± 4.77 | 6.63 ± 4.42 | 7.35 ± 5.10 | 0.493 | 6.36 ± 4.29 | 7.76 ± 5.24 | 0.182 |
| Lack of social recognition | 4.01 ± 2.72 | 3.98 ± 2.65 | 4.05 ± 2.81 | 0.905 | 3.67 ± 2.59 | 4.42 ± 2.83 | 0.209 |
| Social tension | 5.25 ± 4.66 | 5.00 ± 4.82 | 5.49 ± 4.54 | 0.636 | 4.89 ± 4.42 | 5.68 ± 4.94 | 0.442 |
| Social isolation | 6.36 ± 4.23 | 5.88 ± 3.76 | 6.81 ± 4.63 | 0.316 | 6.31 ± 4.42 | 6.42 ± 4.06 | 0.907 |
| TIV | 1563.55 ± 158.48 | 1450.36 ± 116.78 | 1668.85 ± 113.22 | < 0.001 | 1569.80 ± 165.93 | 1556.16 ± 151.04 | 0.699 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Sleep data were from 56 participants due to missing sleep data for some participants. 1 indicates p-value for the differences between females vs. males. 2 indicates p-value for the differences between responders vs. non-responders. BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory-II; STAI = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; CAR = cortisol awakening response; AUCg = area under the curve with respect to the ground; AUCi = area under the curve with respect to the increase
The expert consensus guidelines on the CAR by Stalder et al. [71] indicate that delay between awakening and initiation of sampling is common in CAR studies. In our study, we observed a slight delay in the CAR sampling, with an average delay of 1.83 min (SD = 4.75), which is notably shorter than the average delay (7.1–24.8 min) reported by Stalder et al. [71]. Moreover, no significant differences in sampling time delays were found between females and males (p = 0.78), nor between responders and non-responders (p = 0.14).
Associations between chronic social stress, CAR and sex with GMV of ROIs
Hippocampus For bilateral hippocampus the model including values from the subscale social tension was significant (R2 = 0.544, p < 0.001; see Table S1 in the supplementary material) showing a significant interaction of social tension × sex (β = 0.28, puncorr = 0.023, pFDR = 0.046; see Fig. 2). Both left and right hippocampi showed the same pattern which we report in the supplementary material (see Figure S1 and Table S5). To disentangle the interactions, post-hoc partial correlation analyses revealed a significant negative correlation between social tension and hippocampus GMV in males (r = −0.392, puncorr = 0.011, pFDR = 0.022), whereas no significant correlation was observed in females (r = 0.027, puncorr = 0.873, pFDR = 0.873).
Fig. 2.
Associations between social tension and GMV of the bilateral hippocampus in females and males
No other predictor variables or their interactions were significant for bilateral hippocampus GMV at the corrected level (see Table S1-S4 for statistical parameters on all regression models; Table S5-S8 and Figure S1 for the regression models on left and right hippocampus separately).
Amygdala For the bilateral amygdala, the model including values from the subscale social overload was significant (R2 = 0.573, p < 0.001; see Table S2) showing a significant interaction between social overload × CAR (β = −0.27, puncorr = 0.017, pFDR =0.034; see Fig. 3). Post-hoc partial correlations show a positive, although not significant, correlation in responders (r = 0.127, puncorr = 0.417) and a negative, although not significant, correlation in non-responders (r = −0.213, puncorr = 0.212). No other predictor or interactions showed a significant association with bilateral amygdala GMV (see Table S1-S4 for statistical parameters for all regression models; and Table S5-S8 and Figure S2 for the regression models on left and right amygdala separately).
Fig. 3.
Associations between social overload and GMV of the bilateral amygdala in responders and non-responders. CAR = cortisol awakening response
Discussion
The current exploratory study examined the associations between different facets of chronic social stress, the CAR, sex, and the volume of the hippocampus and amygdala in healthy young individuals. Our results show that higher amounts of self-reported socially tense, conflictual interactions are linked to reduced bilateral hippocampus GMV in males, whereas this pattern differs in females. Furthermore, CAR non-responders who are overwhelmed by the number of social responsibilities (social overload) show reduced amygdala GMV, whereas CAR responders show the opposite pattern.
The relationship between sex and social stress
Females and males differ in the way social interactions are associated with hippocampus volume, with males who reported higher socially tense interactions showing decreased hippocampus volume. Previous studies with mixed samples of females and males, have consistently shown that high levels of perceived life and social stress are associated with reduced hippocampus volume (e.g., [23, 41, 55, 83], and a history of emotional abuse is associated with reduced hippocampus volume in males but not in females [65]. This sex-specific pattern aligns well with results reported in animal studies: In male rats, chronic stress was also found to cause dendritic atrophy of hippocampus pyramidal neurons, whereas this was not seen in females [19, 46]). Recent human reviews have highlighted that the hippocampus is particularly susceptible to stress-related sex differences [20]. In general, prolonged exposure to stress prevents relaxation and the maintenance of homeostasis, which subsequently can alter brain structure by changing neuronal morphology and by suppressing neurogenesis [31, 50]. Our results taken together with these reports in the literature point to sex-specific neuro-morphological changes.
One line of argumentation takes sex hormones such as estradiol and progesterone and their neuroprotective effects into account. Estradiol can enhance dendritic complexity and synaptic spine density in the hippocampus, thereby improving brain volume recovery from injury [21, 28, 38]. Progesterone further augments the effect of estradiol [21]. Both estradiol and progesterone levels are associated with stress reactions in females although not only in a protective way [3, 6, 32]. Thus, protective effects of sex hormones against the dendritic retraction in the hippocampus caused by chronic stress [40, 46, 48], might explain the lack of hippocampus volume reduction in socially stressed females.
Additionally, all females in this study were using OC. While controlling for the potential effects of fluctuations in estradiol and progesterone, it is worth mentioning that most OC contain synthetic estradiol such as ethinylestradiol and/or a synthetic progesterone such as levonorgestrel. Ethinylestradiol, similar to natural sex hormones, induces the synthesis of corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) [49, 78], leading to elevated CBG levels during OC use. Since CBG binds to circulating cortisol, the amount of free and bio-active cortisol available to bind to glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus is reduced [19, 42], potentially mitigating the negative effects of unbound cortisol on hippocampus volume. Furthermore, OC use has been shown to influence brain structures. Previous studies consistently report a positive association between OC use and total GMV, as well as an increase in volumes in regions such as the hippocampus, parahippocampus gyrus, and fusiform gyrus, which is also related to the duration and type of OC use [8, 56, 57].
Overall, biological protective mechanisms in healthy females appear to prevent negative effects of social stress on hippocampus morphology. This seems to contrast with previous arguments that females are more susceptible to social stress, evidenced by higher cortisol responses to social rejection [72], and that they are more likely to be diagnosed with some stress-related mental disorders [39, 43]. Our results indicate that they may show less pronounced volume reductions in the hippocampus following chronic social stress, while males show a higher reduction. Interestingly, social stress such as crowded housing does impact male rats more than females [9]. It is additionally noteworthy that psychosocial stress, which besides a social evaluation and social comparison as stressors also includes achievement as a stressor, improves social processing (social cognition, empathy) in males, but seem to show no or an opposite effect in females [51, 69]. Thus, it might be that chronic social stress induces increased empathic stress in males, which potentially is also associated with cerebral changes in the hippocampus. Our results on social tension highlight the importance of considering sex-specific and neuroendocrine factors in stress-induced brain remodeling.
The association between CAR and social stress
Our data further revealed an interaction of chronic social stress and CAR on brain volume. We observed distinct patterns for CAR non-responders and CAR responders, with a negative association in non-responders and a positive association in responders. This suggest that lacking the typical CAR pattern is linked to a stronger association between being overloaded with social interactions and responsibilities and a reduced amygdala volume. An absent cortisol response to awakening reflects an altered neuroendocrine system and an impaired HPA axis regulation, which is crucial for the maintenance of homeostasis as part of the neurobiological circadian recovery system [71]. The amygdala, a key structure involved in regulating emotions, anxiety, and fear responses [61, 68], is particularly sensitive to psychosocial stress [63]. Its functional network is associated with basal cortisol levels [33]. Our data now indicates that amygdala GMV shows distinct patterns in CAR responders vs. non-responders in association with social overload. Non-responders compared to responders showed a negative association, with more social overload being associated with reduced amygdala volumes. Interestingly, also in social media use, an association with amygdala GMV was reported: An excessive social media use is associated with reduced bilateral amygdala GMV [24]. Additionally, patients with damaged amygdala volume seem to have a smaller social network size [4], and in depressed patient, amygdala volumes are negatively correlated with CAR [64]. Thus, a maladaptive stress response and recovery system may amplify the negative effects of having too much social responsibilities on brain structure. In contrast, a functional CAR indicates a neuroprotective and adaptive HPA axis, enabling the individual to effectively adapt to external social stressors and thereby probably mitigate the adverse effects of chronic stress on amygdala volume. Thereby, in responders, the effective management of the circadian HPA axis for restoration and recovery is linked to a positive association between social interactions and amygdala volume. Non-responders, however, may lack this protective mechanism and flexibility to adapt to external social stressors, which is preventing the body’s homeostasis. This seems further to be associated with reduced amygdala volumes when being chronically exposed to too much social responsibilities. A healthy cortisol circadian rhythm to awakening – indicated by a normal CAR pattern – may promote adaptive regulation of the HPA axis in response to chronic socially stressful situations. Our study adds that the association between social stress and amygdala volume further is associated with the adaptive neurobiological regulation mechanisms of the individual. There seems to be an association between protective effects of a well-functioning circadian neurobiological recovery system, social overload and amygdala volume. Nevertheless, our data so far is only exploratory and correlational, and a causal relationship between the variables needs to be investigated using longitudinal or interventional designs.
Furthermore, in the current study no significant interactions with CAR, sex and hippocampus or amygdala volume were found for chronic social isolation and lack of social recognition. The lack of associations may be related to their characteristics, reflecting prolonged social neglect and insult compared to acute conflicts that strongly activate physiological stress responses [74]. Therefore, our findings suggest that a lot of social responsibilities is a prominent stressor that is associated with amygdala volume when the neurobiological recovery system is missing.
A dysregulation of the HPA axis is commonly reported in mental disorders [11, 34, 76]. Specifically for the CAR, previous studies indicate that depression severity is associated with blunted CAR [2], while a higher waking cortisol level is related to an increased risk of depression [1]. A blunted CAR has also been observed in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder [12] and psychosis [7]. Furthermore, Weber et al. [77] found that patients with functional neurological disorder, a neuropsychiatric condition characterized by a variety of disabling neurological symptoms, exhibit a blunted CAR, and reduced amygdala volumes, which aligns with our findings. Thus, a blunted CAR, along with socially induced overload appears to be associated with mental health issues and structural brain changes. Our findings now add that the hippocampus and the amygdala are reshaped by chronic social stress even in healthy individuals in a sex-specific way and associated with the CAR pattern. The current study suggests that the typical CAR pattern indicates an adaptive neurobiological recovery system that may help to prevent negative effects of social stress and might also impact the development of stress-associated mental disorders.
Future directions
Endogenous and exogenous sex hormones that are varying throughout the menstrual cycle, with hormonal contraceptive intake, and during the menopausal transition, impact CAR [29, 71]. The current study included only females using oral contraceptives which may result in a lower CAR [29]. The impact of endogenous and exogenous sex steroids in females and males at different hormonal stages on CAR and its association with brain structure needs to be addressed in future research [37]. Second, due to limited resources within the current project, the exact sampling time of CAR relied on self-reports only. CAR samples were collected on one day, which may not accurately reflect the usual, longitudinal CAR patterns. To improve the validity of collected samples, additional methods to verify sampling and awakening time would be desirable [62]. Third, while this study focused on structural changes in the hippocampus and the amygdala, future research should explore how the network of these brain regions and other regions involved in stress reaction and regulation are affected. This would provide a more comprehensive understanding of stress-related neurobiological mechanisms. Additionally, the different associations between chronic stress and brain structure observed in responders and non-responders in this study need to be further validated in patients with stress-associated mental disorders. To identify causal relationships, longitudinal and interventional studies would provide further insights into how sex, chronic social stress and CAR impact brain structure over time.
Conclusion
The present study examined the association between effects of chronic social stress, CAR, sex and GMV in the hippocampus and the amygdala, highlighting the complex interplay of stress-related factors in these brain regions. Our findings demonstrate that chronic social tension is related to hippocampus volume differently in females and males, with a significant negative association between social tension levels and hippocampus GMV only in males. In females, higher levels of sex hormones might have a neuroprotective effect and potentially counteract the harmful effects of chronic social stress. In males, increased empathic stress might be associated with anatomical changes. Additionally, we observed that chronic social overload is related to amygdala volume differently in individuals who show a typical cortisol reaction to awakening and those who do not. A negative association between stress levels and GMV of amygdala was seen in non-responders. An inadequate cortisol response upon awakening may reflect underlying dysfunctions in the neurobiological, circadian recovery of the HPA axis, which further seems to be associated with prolonged social stress and brain structure. While a functional CAR indicates an adaptive reaction of the body to reallocate and restore the body’s homeostasis to internal and external influencing factors, a missing CAR, as seen in non-responders, indicates a dysfunction in this neurobiological circadian recovery system.
Overall, chronic social stress levels such as conflicts, socially tense and overwhelming interactions are negatively associated with the morphology of the hippocampus and the amygdala, particularly among males and CAR non-responders. Understanding the sex-specific relationship between stress and brain structure, as well as the association with adaptive function of the HPA axis, is essential for developing effective stress management and intervention strategies. These insights could help mitigate neural structural changes in individuals who are more vulnerable to social stress and could potentially prevent further development of stress-associated mental disorders.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all subjects for the time and effort spent on this study. We acknowledge support from the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Tübingen.
Author contributions
**Rui Wang: ** Conceptualization; Methodology; Formal Analysis; Data Curation; Visualization; Project Administration; Funding Acquisition; Writing - Original Draft; Writing - Review & Editing. **Hannes Noack: ** Investigation; Writing - Review & Editing. **Leandra Kuhn: ** Investigation; Writing - Review & Editing. **Vanessa Nieratschker: ** Writing - Review & Editing; Funding Acquisition. **Ute Habel: ** Writing - Review & Editing; Funding Acquisition. **Birgit Derntl: ** Conceptualization; Resources; Writing - Review & Editing; Supervision; Funding Acquisition. **Lydia Kogler: ** Conceptualization; Methodology; Validation; Data Curation; Writing - Review & Editing; Visualization; Supervision; Project Administration.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; DE 2319/6 − 1 awarded to BD, UH, and VN; IRTG-2804 (RW, BD, VN, LK). RW was supported by Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC, funding No. 202208080182).
Data availability
The data are available upon reasonable request from the authors.
Declarations
Ethics and consent to participate
The study was approved by the ethics committees of the medical faculties at the RWTH Aachen University (EK 212/16) and the University of Tuebingen (409/2015BO2). All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Adam EK, Doane LD, Zinbarg RE, Mineka S, Craske MG, Griffith JW. Prospective prediction of major depressive disorder from cortisol awakening responses in adolescence. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35:921–31. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adams GC, Wrath AJ, von Dewitz B, Marciniuk K, Roesler A, Napper S. Attachment impacts cortisol awakening response in chronically depressed individuals. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;120:104778. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aleknaviciute J, Tulen JHM, De Rijke YB, van der Bouwkamp CG, Timmermans M, Wester VL, Bergink V, Hoogendijk WJG, Tiemeier H, van Rossum EFC, Kooiman CG, Kushner SA. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device potentiates stress reactivity. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;80:39–45. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beadle JN, Heller A, Rosenbaum RS, Davidson PSR, Tranel D, Duff M. Amygdala but not hippocampal damage associated with smaller social network size. Neuropsychologia. 2022;174:108311. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Beck AT. Manual for the Beck depression Inventory-II. No Title; 1996.
- 6.Bencker C, Gschwandtner L, Nayman S, Grikšienė R, Nguyen B, Nater UM, et al. Progestagens and progesterone receptor modulation: effects on the brain, mood, stress, and cognition in females. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2025;76:101160. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2024.101160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berger M, Kraeuter AK, Romanik D, Malouf P, Amminger GP, Sarnyai Z. Cortisol awakening response in patients with psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:157–66. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brouillard A, Davignon L-M, Vachon-Presseau É, Roy M, Marin M-F. Starting the pill during adolescence: age of onset and duration of use influence morphology of the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2024;60:5876–99. 10.1111/ejn.16509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brown KJ, Grunberg NE. Effects of housing on male and female rats: crowding stresses male but calm females. Physiol Behav. 1995;58:1085–9. 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02043-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bürger Z, Müller VI, Hoffstaedter F, Habel U, Gur RC, Windischberger C, et al. Stressor-specific sex differences in Amygdala–Frontal cortex networks. J Clin Med. 2023;12:865. 10.3390/jcm12030865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cherian K, Schatzberg AF, Keller J. HPA axis in psychotic major depression and schizophrenia spectrum disorders: cortisol, clinical symptomatology, and cognition. Schizophr Res. 2019;213:72–9. 10.1016/j.schres.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chida Y, Steptoe A. Cortisol awakening response and psychosocial factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Psychol. 2009;80:265–78. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clow A, Thorn L, Evans P, Hucklebridge F. The awakening cortisol response: methodological issues and significance. Stress Amst Neth. 2004;7:29–37. 10.1080/10253890410001667205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Conrad CD, McLaughlin KJ, Huynh TN, El-Ashmawy M, Sparks M. Chronic stress and a cyclic regimen of estradiol administration separately facilitate spatial memory: relationship with hippocampal CA1 spine density and dendritic complexity. Behav Neurosci. 2012;126:142–56. 10.1037/a0025770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De Kloet ER, Vreugdenhil E, Oitzl MS, Joëls M. Brain corticosteroid receptor balance in health and disease. Endocr Rev. 1998;19:269–301. 10.1210/edrv.19.3.0331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Del Casale A, Ferracuti S, Barbetti AS, Bargagna P, Zega P, Iannuccelli A, et al. Grey matter volume reductions of the left hippocampus and amygdala in PTSD: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neuropsychobiology. 2022;81:257–64. 10.1159/000522003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Duan H, Yuan Y, Zhang L, Qin S, Zhang K, Buchanan TW, Wu J. Chronic stress exposure decreases the cortisol awakening response in healthy young men. Stress Amst Neth. 2013;16:630–7. 10.3109/10253890.2013.840579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fuchs E, Flügge G. Chronic social stress: effects on limbic brain structures. Physiol Behav. 2003;79:417–27. 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00161-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Galea LAM, McEwen BS, Tanapat P, Deak T, Spencer RL, Dhabhar FS. Sex differences in dendritic atrophy of CA3 pyramidal neurons in response to chronic restraint stress. Neuroscience. 1997;81:689–97. 10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00233-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Georgousopoulou V, Serdari A, Manomenidis G, Dacou-Voutetakis C. Prenatal stress, hormones, and fetal brain development: gender differences. Hormones. 2025. 10.1007/s42000-025-00696-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gould E, Woolley CS, Frankfurt M, McEwen BS. Gonadal steroids regulate dendritic spine density in hippocampal pyramidal cells in adulthood. J Neurosci. 1990;10:1286–91. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-04-01286.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gray JD, Kogan JF, Marrocco J, McEwen BS. Genomic and epigenomic mechanisms of glucocorticoids in the brain. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13:661–73. 10.1038/nrendo.2017.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hanson JL, Nacewicz BM, Sutterer MJ, Cayo AA, Schaefer SM, Rudolph KD, et al. Behavioral problems after early life stress: contributions of the hippocampus and amygdala. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:314–23. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.He Q, Turel O, Brevers D, Bechara A. Excess social media use in normal populations is associated with amygdala-striatal but not with prefrontal morphology. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017;269:31–5. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1:2. 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Henze G-I, Konzok J, Kudielka BM, Wüst S, Nichols TE, Kreuzpointner L. Associations between cortisol stress responses and limbic volume and thickness in young adults: an exploratory study. Eur J Neurosci. 2023;58:3962–80. 10.1111/ejn.16161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Herman JP, McKlveen JM, Solomon MB, Carvalho-Netto E, Myers B. Neural regulation of the stress response: glucocorticoid feedback mechanisms. Braz J Med Biol Res Rev Bras Pesqui Medicas E Biol. 2012;45:292–8. 10.1590/s0100-879x2012007500041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hoffman GE, Merchenthaler I, Zup SL. Neuroprotection by ovarian hormones in animal models of neurological disease. Endocrine. 2006;29:217–31. 10.1385/ENDO:29:2:217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Høgsted ES, Borgsted C, Dam VH, Nasser A, Rye Jørgensen N, Ozenne B, et al. Stress-hormone dynamics and working memory in healthy women who use oral contraceptives versus non-users. Front Endocrinol. 2021. 10.3389/fendo.2021.731994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jackson-Koku G. Beck Depression Inventory. Occup Med. 2016;66:174–5. 10.1093/occmed/kqv087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim EJ, Pellman B, Kim JJ. Stress effects on the hippocampus: a critical review. Learn Mem Cold Spring Harb N. 2015;22:411–6. 10.1101/lm.037291.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kirschbaum C, Kudielka BM, Gaab J, Schommer NC, Hellhammer DH. Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychosom Med. 1999;61:154–62. 10.1097/00006842-199903000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kogler L, Müller VI, Seidel E-M, Boubela R, Kalcher K, Moser E, et al. Sex differences in the functional connectivity of the amygdalae in association with cortisol. Neuroimage. 2016;134:410–23. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kogler L, Wang R, Luther T, Hofer A, Frajo-Apor B, Derntl B. Cortisol in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2025;77:101186. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2025.101186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kuhn L, Noack H, Skoluda N, Wagels L, Röhr A-K, Schulte C, Eisenkolb S, Nieratschker V, Derntl B, Habel U. The association of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and the response to different stressors in healthy males. J Neural Transm Vienna Austria 1996. 2021;128:1347–59. 10.1007/s00702-021-02390-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kuhn L, Noack H, Wagels L, Prothmann A, Schulik A, Aydin E, et al. Sex-dependent multimodal response profiles to psychosocial stress. Cereb Cortex. 2022. 10.1093/cercor/bhac086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee BH, Eid RS, Hodges TE, Barth C, Galea LAM. Leveraging research into sex differences and steroid hormones to improve brain health. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024. 10.1038/s41574-024-01061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lee SJ, McEwen BS. Neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions of estrogens and their therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001;41:569–91. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li SH, Graham BM. Why are women so vulnerable to anxiety, trauma-related and stress-related disorders? The potential role of sex hormones. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:73–82. 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30358-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lin Y, Ter Horst GJ, Wichmann R, Bakker P, Liu A, Li X, Westenbroek C. Sex differences in the effects of acute and chronic stress and recovery after long-term stress on stress-related brain regions of rats. Cereb Cortex N Y N 1991. 2009;19:1978–89. 10.1093/cercor/bhn225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lindgren L, Bergdahl J, Nyberg L. Longitudinal evidence for smaller hippocampus volume as a vulnerability factor for perceived stress. Cereb Cortex N Y N 1991. 2016;26:3527–33. 10.1093/cercor/bhw154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mataradze GD, Kurabekova RM, Rozen VB. The role of sex steroids in the formation of sex-differentiated concentrations of corticosteroid-binding globulin in rats. J Endocrinol. 1992;132:235–40. 10.1677/joe.0.1320235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero J-J, DeMeo DL, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396:565–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.McEwen BS, Gianaros PJ. Central role of the brain in stress and adaptation: links to socioeconomic status, health, and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186:190–222. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05331.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McEwen BS, Nasca C, Gray JD. Stress effects on neuronal structure: Hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;41:3–23. 10.1038/npp.2015.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.McLaughlin KJ, Baran SE, Conrad CD. Chronic stress- and sex-specific neuromorphological and functional changes in limbic structures. Mol Neurobiol. 2009;40:166–82. 10.1007/s12035-009-8079-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McLaughlin KJ, Baran SE, Wright RL, Conrad CD. Chronic stress enhances spatial memory in ovariectomized female rats despite CA3 dendritic retraction: possible involvement of CA1 neurons. Neuroscience. 2005;135:1045–54. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.McLaughlin KJ, Wilson JO, Harman J, Wright RL, Wieczorek L, Gomez J, et al. Chronic 17β-estradiol or cholesterol prevents stress‐induced hippocampal CA3 dendritic retraction in ovariectomized female rats: possible correspondence between CA1 spine properties and spatial acquisition. Hippocampus. 2010;20:768–86. 10.1002/hipo.20678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Moore DE, Kawagoe S, Davajan V, Nakamura RM, Mishell DR. An in vivo system in man for quantitation of estrogenicity. II. Pharmacologic changes in binding capacity of serum corticosteroid-binding globulin induced by conjugated estrogens, mestranol, and ethinyl estradiol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;130:482–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nicolaides NC, Kyratzi E, Lamprokostopoulou A, Chrousos GP, Charmandari E. Stress, the stress system and the role of glucocorticoids. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2015;22:6–19. 10.1159/000362736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nitschke JP, Pruessner JC, Bartz JA. Stress and stress-induced glucocorticoids facilitate empathic accuracy in men but have no effects for women. Psychol Sci. 2022;33:1783–94. 10.1177/09567976221101315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Noack H, Nolte L, Nieratschker V, Habel U, Derntl B. Imaging stress: an overview of stress induction methods in the MR scanner. J Neural Transm. 2019;126(9):1187–202. 10.1007/s00702-018-01965-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nolan M, Roman E, Nasa A, Levins KJ, O’Hanlon E, O’Keane V, et al. Hippocampal and amygdalar volume changes in major depressive disorder: a targeted review and focus on stress. Chronic Stress. 2020;4:2470547020944553. 10.1177/2470547020944553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Patel D, Anilkumar S, Chattarji S, Buwalda B. Repeated social stress leads to contrasting patterns of structural plasticity in the amygdala and hippocampus. Behav Brain Res. 2018;347:314–24. 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Piccolo LR, Noble KG. Perceived stress is associated with smaller hippocampal volume in adolescence. Psychophysiology. 2018;55:e13025. 10.1111/psyp.13025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pletzer B, Harris T, Hidalgo-Lopez E. Previous contraceptive treatment relates to grey matter volumes in the hippocampus and basal ganglia. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11003. 10.1038/s41598-019-47446-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pletzer B, Kronbichler M, Kerschbaum H. Differential effects of androgenic and anti-androgenic progestins on fusiform and frontal Gray matter volume and face recognition performance. Brain Res. 2015;1596:108–15. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pruessner JC, Wolf OT, Hellhammer DH, Buske-Kirschbaum A, von Auer K, Jobst S, et al. Free cortisol levels after awakening: a reliable biological marker for the assessment of adrenocortical activity. Life Sci. 1997;61:2539–49. 10.1016/S0024-3205(97)01008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pruessner M, Bechard-Evans L, Pira S, Joober R, Collins DL, Pruessner JC, Malla AK. Interplay of hippocampal volume and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis function as markers of stress vulnerability in men at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Psychol Med. 2017;47:471–83. 10.1017/S0033291716002658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pruessner M, Lepage M, Collins DL, Pruessner JC, Joober R, Malla AK. Reduced hippocampal volume and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis function in first episode psychosis: evidence for sex differences. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;7:195–202. 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ressler KJ. Amygdala activity, fear, and anxiety: modulation by stress. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67:1117–9. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Richer R, Abel L, Küderle A, Eskofier BM, Rohleder N. Carwatch - a smartphone application for improving the accuracy of cortisol awakening response sampling. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023;151:106073. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2023.106073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Roberts AG, Peckins MK, Gard AM, Hein TC, Hardi FA, Mitchell C, Monk CS, Hyde LW, Lopez-Duran NL. Amygdala reactivity during socioemotional processing and cortisol reactivity to a psychosocial stressor. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022;144:105855. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Roddy D, Kelly JR, Farrell C, Doolin K, Roman E, Nasa A, et al. Amygdala substructure volumes in Major Depressive Disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;31:102781. 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Samplin E, Ikuta T, Malhotra AK, Szeszko PR, DeRosse P. Sex differences in resilience to childhood maltreatment: effects of trauma history on hippocampal volume, general cognition and subclinical psychosis in healthy adults. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:1174–9. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schulz P, Schlotz W. Trierer inventar Zur erfassung von chronischem Streß (TICS): Skalenkonstruktion, teststatistische Überprüfung und validierung der Skala Arbeitsüberlastung. Diagnostica. 1999;45:8–19 [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schulz P, Schlotz W, Becker P. 2004. Trierer Inventar zum Chronischen Stress (TICS) [Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress (TICS)] [WWW Document]. URL https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/50017/ (accessed 5.31.24).
- 68.Šimić G, Tkalčić M, Vukić V, Mulc D, Španić E, Šagud M, Olucha-Bordonau FE, Vukšić M, Hof R, P. Understanding emotions: origins and roles of the amygdala. Biomolecules. 2021;11:823. 10.3390/biom11060823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Smeets T, Dziobek I, Wolf OT. Social cognition under stress: differential effects of stress-induced cortisol elevations in healthy young men and women. Horm Behav. 2009;55:507–13. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Spielberger CD, Vagg PR, Barker LR, Donham GW, Westberry LG. The factor structure of the state-trait anxiety inventory. Stress. 1980;7:95–109. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Stalder T, Kirschbaum C, Kudielka BM, Adam EK, Pruessner JC, Wüst S, Dockray S, Smyth N, Evans P, Hellhammer DH, Miller R, Wetherell MA, Lupien SJ, Clow A. Assessment of the cortisol awakening response: expert consensus guidelines. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;63:414–32. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Stroud LR, Salovey P, Epel ES. Sex differences in stress responses: social rejection versus achievement stress. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:318–27. 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sublette ME, Galfalvy HC, Oquendo MA, Bart CP, Schneck N, Arango V, Mann JJ. Relationship of recent stress to amygdala volume in depressed and healthy adults. J Affect Disord. 2016;203:136–42. 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wade M, Fox NA, Zeanah CH, Nelson CA. Long-term effects of institutional rearing, foster care, and brain activity on memory and executive functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:1808–13. 10.1073/pnas.1809145116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wang Q, Verweij EWE, Krugers HJ, Joels M, Swaab DF, Lucassen PJ. Distribution of the glucocorticoid receptor in the human amygdala; changes in mood disorder patients. Brain Struct Funct. 2014;219:1615–26. 10.1007/s00429-013-0589-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wang R, Kogler L, Derntl B. Sex differences in cortisol levels in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2024;72:101118. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Weber S, Bühler J, Vanini G, Loukas S, Bruckmaier R, Aybek S. Identification of biopsychological trait markers in functional neurological disorders. Brain J Neurol. 2023;146:2627–41. 10.1093/brain/awac442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wiegratz I, Kutschera E, Lee JH, Moore C, Mellinger U, Winkler UH, Kuhl H. Effect of four different oral contraceptives on various sex hormones and serum-binding globulins. Contraception. 2003;67:25–32. 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00436-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wittchen H-U, Zaudig M, Fydrich T. Skid. Strukturiertes klinisches interview für DSM-IV. Achse I und II. Handanweisung; 1997.
- 80.World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–4. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wu D, Zheng J. Social media overload, gender differences and knowledge withholding. Kybernetes. 2023;52:24–43. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Xiong B, Chen C, Tian Y, Zhang S, Liu C, Evans TM, et al. Brain preparedness: the proactive role of the cortisol awakening response in hippocampal-prefrontal functional interactions. Prog Neurobiol. 2021;205:102127. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zimmerman ME, Ezzati A, Katz MJ, Lipton ML, Brickman AM, Sliwinski MJ, et al. Perceived stress is differentially related to hippocampal subfield volumes among older adults. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0154530. 10.1371/journal.pone.0154530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data are available upon reasonable request from the authors.



