Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2025 Nov 21;14(23):3565. doi: 10.3390/plants14233565

Actinidia arguta: Biological and Health Promoting Properties—Analysis of Bioactive Components

Irena Maria Choma 1,*, Małgorzata Olszowy-Tomczyk 1,*
Editor: Manuel Viuda-Martos1
PMCID: PMC12694314  PMID: 41375275

Abstract

Actinidia arguta, also known as mini kiwi (due to its small size) or hardy kiwi (due to its frost resistance), is becoming an increasingly popular fruit alongside its commercially older siblings, i.e., A. deliciosa (green kiwi fruit) and A. chinensis (golden kiwifruit), from the Actinidiaceae family. This review paper discusses the biological and pharmacological properties of A. arguta fruits, with a special focus on methods of the bioactive component analysis. Mini kiwi is a valuable source of bioactive compounds, which contribute to its health-promoting properties, among others: antioxidant, neuroprotective, anticholinergic, antitumor, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antiobesity as well as antiatherosclerotic ones. They are briefly discussed, illustrating the action of bioactive ingredients and the methods of analysis, which are presented in the tables. This review includes a concise characterization of A. arguta and updates the current field of knowledge about its diverse biological activities, which are undoubtedly related to the content of bioactive components and the methods used for their isolation and analysis. The information included in this review paper will be helpful in perceiving mini kiwi not only as a tasty fruit but also as a source of bioactive ingredients with beneficial, health-promoting effects on the body. Effective isolation of these components can contribute to the future development of antiaging and anticancer drugs, which undoubtedly will lead to further research and promote this species.

Keywords: Actinidia arguta, mini kiwi, hardy kiwi, Actinidiaceae, bioactive components, chromatographic analysis, biological properties

1. Introduction

A. arguta (hardy kiwi, mini kiwi) belongs to the Actinidiaceae family, the genus Actinidia, together with A. deliciosa (A. chinensis var. deliciosa, green kiwifruit) and A. chinensis (A. chinensis var. chinensis, golden kiwifruit), which are very popular on the world market [1]. All species are perennial, woody climbing vines (lianas), growing naturally in woodlands of East Asia [2]. The popularity of Actinidia fruits is linked to their flavor and health benefits. They have had a long history of wild harvesting, while the process of domestication lasted over 100 years [3,4].

The cultivation of A. chinensis began in New Zealand in the early 20th century from seeds brought from China by the teacher Isabel Fraser [5]. It appeared commercially in the 1960s. Since then, it has become widespread and available year-round. At first, it was called “Chinese gooseberry” due to its sweet-spicy flavor and green color. This name did not gain popularity, and in 1959 it was finally changed to kiwi, after New Zealand’s national bird [6]. The diversity of wild Actinidia species has contributed to the creation of new varieties with many desirable features appreciated by customers and known for various morphological characteristics [7]. The Actinidia plants are cultivated commercially in New Zealand, Italy, Spain, Greece, France, the United States, Japan, Israel and Chile [8].

A. arguta is a tall climbing vine first described in 1843 by Philipp Franz von Siebold and Joseph Gerhard Zuccarini. The most recognized variety of hardy kiwi is A. arguta var. arguta. The name is common for the three previously described varieties: A. arguta var. purpuea (Rehder) C.F. Liang, A. arguta var. cordifolia (Miq.) Bean, and A. arguta var. nervosa C.F. Liang. A. arguta var. giraldii (Diels) Vorosch is a less common variety originating from the Sichuan province of China [9,10].

A. arguta is native to East Asia, from the Russian Far East, China and Korea to Japan and Malaysia, where it grows mainly in luminous forests. Additionally, A. arguta in its wild state spreads across the Northeastern United States as an invasive plant forming dense monocultures, which can be surprising [11].

Although the genus Actinidia was created by Lindley as early as 1836 [9], the currently valid taxonomy was established in 2007 [12]. Accordingly, it comprises 55 species (total of 76 taxa including 21 subspecies), 44 of which are endemic to China. The genus is divided into four sections: Stellatae, Strigosae, Maculatae, and Leiocarpae. A. arguta belongs to the last one, the most resistant in terms of frost hardiness. Leiocarpae includes the other frost-resistant Actinidia species: A. kolomikta (Maxim. & Rupr.) Maxim., A. polygama (Siebold and Zucc.) Maxim., A. melanandra Franch., A. macrosperma C.F. Liang, and A. hyperleuca Nakai. The skin of their fruits is smooth, hairless, and spotless [13].

For clarity, from this point the name A. arguta will be used, which de facto means A. arguta var. arguta (full scientific name Actinidia arguta (Siebold & Zuccarini) Planchon ex Miquel). Similarly, A. deliciosa will be used for A. chinensis var. deliciosa and A. chinensis for A. chinensis var. chinensis. In the non-specialist literature and colloquially, such common names as arctic kiwi, baby kiwi, bower Actinidia, bower vine, cocktail kiwi, dessert kiwi, hardy kiwi, Japanese Actinidia, kiwiberry, mini kiwi, Siberian gooseberry, taravine, and vinepear are used for A. arguta [14]. In this paper the names hardy kiwi, kiwiberry and mini kiwi are used interchangeably with A. arguta.

Although A. arguta is native to Eastern Asia, it is widely cultivated in many parts of the world, including Europe, North and South America, as well as New Zealand because of its hardiness, which allows it to withstand a wide range of temperatures including extremely low ones (−32 °C) for some cultivars. However, to acclimate to the cold and survive, they require gradual drops in temperature. Currently, there are many cultivars of A. arguta available, each with different sensory characteristics. The well-known ones are the following: ‘Ananasnaya’, ‘Geneva’, ‘Weiki’, ‘Issai’, ‘Jumbo’, ‘Ken’s Red’, and ‘Maki’ [15,16].

A. arguta differs from A. chinensis or A. deliciosa in certain characteristics, including a smaller size of the fruit and smooth, hairless, edible skin [17]. The fruit is usually eaten raw as a mini snack. It can also be remade into jams, wines, and other edibles. It should be emphasized that not only are the fruits rich in bioactive ingredients with multiple pharmacological and therapeutic effects, but the leaves, roots and stems are as well. The flowers are a source of essential oils [18]. A. arguta is distinguished by its exceptionally large content of biologically active compounds that positively affect the human body. It is one of the richest sources of vitamin C and many other biologically active compounds [10]. Due to its large content of vital nutrients (about 20), valuable to the human body, mini kiwi is considered a “healthy food” or “superfood.” According to the literature reports [19], over 500 compounds were isolated from the plant, which can be potentially used as ingredients for food, cosmetic and drug industries [18].

2. Bioactive Compounds of Actinidia arguta Fruits

2.1. Organic Acids, Polyphenols, Volatiles, Pigments

Besides being the well-known antioxidant product, mini kiwi is characterized by anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antidiabetic and antidermatitic properties as well as neuro-, nephro-, hepato- and cardioprotective actions. Most of these properties are related to the large content of polyphenolic compounds, which are considered powerful antioxidants. Polyphenols can be divided into the following [20]:

  • Phenolic acids, e.g., caffeic or chlorogenic acid.

  • Flavonoid polyphenols like catechin, epicatechin, quercetin and procyanidins.

Vitamin C, found in large quantities in A. arguta, also has strong antioxidant properties. It is associated with neuroprotective effects as well as anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties of mini kiwi. Antioxidant capacity, as well as the corresponding polyphenol and/or vitamin C content, is usually determined using spectrophotometric methods such as Folin–Ciocalteu for polyphenols or DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and ORAC methods to determine the total antioxidant capacity [21]. In order to determine the composition and to identify individual bioactive compounds, chromatography is used, mainly HPLC combined with spectroscopic detection methods (UV–VIS, DAD, MS) [22], while, in the case of volatile compounds, gas chromatography (FID, MS) can be applied [23]. As it was stated before, there is significant diversity of bioactive compounds discovered in A. arguta. Therefore, Table 1 presents only selected examples of analysis of bioactive compounds found in A. arguta fruits. These compounds are divided into four main classes: organic acids, phenolic acids, flavonoids and volatile compounds. There is also some information on pigments, like carotenoids and chlorophylls. The table also shows the sample preparation methods. It should be noted that both properties and flavor of the fruits depend largely on the contents and proportions of bioactive ingredients. The variability of their composition [24] is related not only to variety or cultivar but also to cultivation method and climate [25].

Table 1.

Examples of the A. arguta fruit analysis.

Chemical Composition Major Compounds Sample Preparation Methods of
Determination
References
Organic acids oxalic acid
quinic acid
malic acid
shikimic acid
lactic acid
citric acid
not specified HPLC-UV/VIS [26]
oxalic acid
quinic acid
malic acid
shikimic acid
lactic acid
citric acid
not specified not specified [27]
Phenolic acids tannic acid,
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid,
hydroxybenzoic acid,
chlorogenic acid,
caffeic acid
  • extraction of homogenized fresh fruit with acidified methanol

  • concentration (methanol evaporation)

HPLC-UV/VIS [28]
caffeic acid-O-hexoside
neochlorogenic acid,
chlorogenic acid,
trans–p-coumaryoyl quinic acid
  • centrifugation of freeze-dried fruit with a mixture of methanol/water/acetic acid/ascorbic acid (30:68:1:1, v/v)

  • sonication of the mixture

LC-MS-PDA-Q-TOF (for identification)
UPLC-PDA (for quantification)
[29]
protocatechuic acid
caffeic acid
chlorogenic acid
  • extraction of freeze-dried fruit with methanol

UPLC-Q-TOF-MS (for identification)
HPLC-PDA-MS (for quantification)
[18]
gallic acid
chlorogenic acid
caffeic acid
coumaric acid
  • extraction of fresh fruit with methanol and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol

  • filtration

HPLC-UV/VIS [30]
chlorogenic acid
neochlorogenic acid
caffeic acid
  • extraction of freeze-dried fruit with acidified methanol

  • sonication of the mixture

  • centrifugation

  • concentration (by evaporating methanol)

HPLC-DAD [31]
neochlorogenic acid
cryptochlorogenic acid
  • extraction of fresh fruit with aqueous ethanol

  • centrifugation

  • concentration (by the solvent evaporation)

HPLC-DAD [32]
caffeic acid-O-hexoside
neochlorogenic acid
chlorogenic acid
cryptchlorogenic acid
  • extraction of freeze-dried fruit with acidified methanol

  • sonication of the mixture

  • centrifugation

  • filtration

LC-PDA/MS QTof
UPLC-PDA-FL
[33]
Flavonoids Flavonols
(quercetin)
Flavanols
((+)-catechin, epicatechin)
  • extraction of homogenized fresh fruit with acidified methanol

  • centrifugation

  • filtration

  • concentration (methanol evaporation)

HPLC-UV/VIS [28]
Flavonols
(quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, quercetin-3-O-(acetyl-rhamnoside)-(1⟶6) galactoside, keampferol-3-O-galactoside, keampferol-3-O-glucoside)
Flavanols
(proanthocyanidin B1, proanthocyanidin B3, proanthocyanidin B4, ((+)-catechin, epicatechin, procyanidin C1, proanthocyanidin dimer)
Anthocyanins
(cyanidin-3-O-samubioside)
  • extraction of freeze-dried fruit with a mixture of methanol/water/acetic acid/ascorbic acid

  • centrifugation

  • filtration

LC-MS-PDA-Q-TOF (for identification)
UPLC-PDA
(for quantification)
[29]
Flavonols
(quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, quercetin-3-O-galactoside,
quercetin-3-O-glucoside)
Flavanols
((+)-gallocatechin, Proanthocyanidin B2, Proanthocyanidin C1,)
  • extraction of freeze-dried fruit with methanol

UPLC-Q-TOF-MS (for identification)
HPLC-PDA-MS (for quantification)
[18]
Flavonols
(quercetin, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside)
Flavanols
((+)-catechin, (−)-epicatechin,)
  • extraction of fresh fruit with methanol and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol

  • filtration

HPLC-UV/VIS [30]
Flavonols
(quercetin, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, quercetin-3-rhamnoside)
Flavanols
((+)-catechin, procyanidin B1; procyanidin B2)
  • extraction of freeze-dried fruit with acidified methanol

  • sonication of the extract

  • centrifugation

  • concentration (methanol evaporation)

HPLC-DAD [31]
Flavonols
(quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, isoquercitrin, hyperoside)
Flavanols
(procyanidin B2, epicatechin)
  • extraction of fresh fruit with aqueous ethanol

  • centrifugation

  • concentration (ethanol evaporation)

HPLC-DAD [32]
Flavonols
(quercetin-3-O-galactoside, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, quercetin-3-O-(acetyl-rhamnoside)-(1⟶6)
-galactoside, keampferol-3-O-galactoside
Flavanols
(polymeric procyanidins
Anthocyanins
(cyanidin-3-O-samubioside)
  • extraction of freeze-dried fruit with acidified methanol

  • sonication of the extract

  • centrifugation

  • filtration

LC-PDA/MS Q-TOF
UPLC-PDA-FL
[33]
Volatile Compounds Terpenes
(camphor, eucalyptol, α-terpineol, terpinolene)
Benzenoid compounds
(ethyl benzoate, methyl benzoate))
Esters
(ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexadecanoate, ethyl hexadec-9-enoate, ethyl linoleate, ethyl linolenate, ethyl octanoate, 1-methylethyl tetradecanoate, methyl hexadecanoate, methyl linoleate, methyl oleate)
Aldehydes
(hepta-E2,E4-dienal, hexanal, hex-E2-enal)
Ketones
(octan-2,3-dione, pent-E3-en-2-one)
Alcohols
(dodecanol, hexanol)
Hydrocarbons
(2-methylpenta-1,3-diene, octadecane)
Sulfur compounds
(bis(1-methylethyl)disulphide)
  • head space

(fruit pulp was placed in the headspace adapter with the magnetic stirrer
  • solvent extraction

(fruit pulp was extracted first with EtOH, then distilled to remove solids and waxes; the resulting distillate was mixed with pentane)
GC-FID
GC-MS
[23]
Terpenes
(dipentene M, dipentene D, camphen, α-pinene, myrcene, terpinolene)
Esters
(methyl butanoate, ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, and ethyl hexanoate)
Aldehydes
(Heptanal D, Butanal M, Butanal D, Benzaldehyde, Isobutyraldehyde M)
Ketones
(2-Octanone, L(-)-Carvone, Isomenthone, 2-Hexanone 3-Hepten-2-one)
Alcohols
(Carveol D, hexanol, 3-Methyl-1-butanol, 1-Butanol)
Pyrazines
(2-Methoxy-3-methylpyrazine, 2-Methoxy-3-methylpyrazine, 2-Ethyl-3-methylpyrazine)
Furans
(2,5-Dimethylfuran, 2-Pentylfuran)
  • homogenization in the headspace vial

  • internal standard addition (4-methyl-2-pentanol)

  • the sample was injected after incubation at 60 °C for 15 min.

HS-GC-IMS [26]
Terpenes
(α-phellandrene,
α-pinene, myrcene and terpinene)
Esters
(ethyl butyrate, butyl isovalerate, butyl acetate, hexyl acetate, hexyl propanoate,
isopentyl acetate, isobutyl acetate and methyl butyrate)
Aldehydes
((E)-2-hexenal, (E)-2-octenal, (Z)-4-heptenal, 1-hexanal,
1-nonanal, valeraldehyde, valeraldehyde, 3-Methyl butanal and benzaldehyde)
Ketones
(1-penten-3-one and acetoin)
Alcohols
(1-octen-3-ol)
Pyrazines
(2,3,5-Trimethylpyrazine)
Furans
(2,5-Dimethylfuran)
  • homogenization in the headspace vial

  • internal standard addition (4-methyl-2-pentanol)

HS-GC-IMS [27]
Terpenes
(ß–amyrin, α-amyrin)
Esters
(Linoleic acid butyl ester)
Aldehydes
(hexanal, 2-hexenal)
Hydrocarbons
(docosane, triosane, tetracosane, pentacosane, hexacosane, heptacosane, octacosane, triacosane, nonacosane, hentriacontane, squalene)
Alcohols
(cholest-5-en-3-ol, stigmaste-5,22–dien-ol, hexacosanol, γ-sitosterol)
  • homogenization

  • extraction with hexane

  • filtration

  • solvent evaporation

GC-MS [34]
Pigments Carotenoids
(lutein, β-carotene)
Chlorophylls
(chlorophyll a and b)
  • extraction of homogenized fresh fruit with hexane/methanol/butylhydroxyanisole mixture

  • centrifugation

  • solvent evaporation

  • reconstitution in the mobile phase

HPLC–electrochemical detector [28]
  • homogenization of freeze-dried fruit with acetone/petroleum ether–carotenoids

  • homogenization of freeze-dried fruit with acetone-chlorophylls

HPLC–PDA [22]
Spectrophotometrically; detection at the following λ (nm): 661.6 (chlorophyll a), 644.8 (chlorophyll b)

The most reliable information, regarding the variation in the contents depending on the variety/cultivar, concerns the largest group of bioactive compounds, i.e., polyphenols. According to Wojdyło et al. [33], who examined seven commercially available cultivars, the total phenolic content ranges from 2443.3 mg/100 g DM (for the ‘Jumbo’) to as much as 6679.18 mg/100 g DM (for the ‘Ananasnaja’), with the largest share of polymeric procyanidins, the content of which ranges from 2424 mg/100 g DM (for the ‘Jumbo’) to 6580 mg/100 g DM (for the ‘Ananasnaja’). The total flavonol content ranges from 9.53 mg/100 g DM (for the ‘Jumbo’) to 72.05 mg/100 g DM (for the ‘Ananasnaja’) and up to 108.45 mg/100 g DM (for the ‘Bingo’). Even smaller contents were observed for phenolic acids, the total content of which ranges from 8.88 mg/100 g DM (for the ‘Jumbo’) to approximately 24.5 mg/100 g DM (‘Ananasnaja’ and ‘Geneva’) cultivars. As it was stated before, the content of bioactive compounds depends not only on cultivars but also place and method of cultivation as well as storage conditions and post-harvest handling [24,25]. However, there are not enough consistent and comprehensive data concerning influence of these factors on the content of bioactive compounds.

2.2. Vitamin C

Vitamin C is one of the most important water-soluble vitamins, a crucial component of the human diet, commonly found in fruits and vegetables [35]. In addition to neutralizing free radicals [36,37] and reducing the incidence of heart disease and cancer [38], it participates in muscle, bone, and teeth construction [39], and it supports the absorption of iron and amino acids from food as well as prevents scurvy. The daily requirement for vitamin C can be satisfied by eating one kiwi fruit [31]. The literature proved that vitamin C is one of the main components determining the antioxidant properties of Actinidia fruits [16], including A. arguta [40,41]. With this in mind, this paper devotes a separate section to vitamin C, and Table 2 summarizes the data on the studies on the vitamin C content in mini kiwi.

Table 2.

Vitamin C content in A. arguta fruits.

Vitamin C Content Sample Preparation Methods of Determination References
Total value * 86.1 to 106.6 mg/100 g FW **
  • extraction of fresh fruit with metaphosphoric acid/perchloric acid mixture

  • reduction of dehydroascorbic acid to ascorbic acid in the presence of dithiothreitol

HPLC-UV/VIS [28]
Non-total value * 50 to 93.94/100 g FW
  • extraction of fresh fruit with metaphosphoric acid/perchloric acid mixture

HPLC-UV/VIS [30]
Total value 37 to 185 mg/100 g FW
  • extraction of the fresh fruit homogenate with glacial 5% orthophosphoric acid containing EDTA.

  • centrifugation of the blended mixture

  • reduction of dehydroascorbic acid using tris[2-carboxyethyl]phosphine.

HPLC-UV/VIS [42]
Total value 144.7–218.1 mg/100 g FW
  • extraction of fresh fruit with metaphosphoric acid/perchloric acid mixture

  • purification

  • reduction of dehydroascorbic acid to ascorbic acid in the presence of dithiothreitol

HPLC-UV/VIS [43]
Non-total value 51.32 mg/100 g FW
  • homogenization of fresh fruit with 5%, w/v trichloroacetic acid

  • centrifugation of the mixture

  • mixing the supernatant with trichloroacetic acid, ethanol, phosphoric acid in ethanol, 1,10-phenanthroline, and iron(III) trichloride

Spectrophotometric measurements [31]
Non-total value 55.2–130 mg/100 g FW
  • homogenization of fresh fruit with metaphosphoric acid (5%, w/v)

  • separation using 5% (w/v) metaphosphoric acid solution

  • adjusting the solution to a known volume with 5% (w/v) metaphosphoric acid solution

  • three independent extractions were performed

HPLC-DAD [32]
Non-total value 76.09–282.56 mg/100 g FW
  • homogenization of fresh fruit with 0.1 M metaphosphoric acid

  • centrifugation and separation

LC-PDA/MS Q-Tof
UPLC-PDA-FL
[33]
Total value 53.95 mg/100 g FW
  • extraction of fruit with oxalic acid

  • reduction of dehydroascorbic acid to ascorbic acid in the presence of 2,6-dichlorophenoline-dophenol

  • extraction of excess pigment with xylene

Spectrophotometric measurements [44]
Non-total value 67.8–85.2 mg/100 g FW
  • extraction of fresh frozen fruit with metaphosphoric acid

  • filtration

HPLC-UV/DAD [45]
Total value 50–300 mg/100 g FW (depending on the cultivar and time after flowering)
  • extraction of fresh frozen fruit with metaphosphoric acid and acetic acid

  • centrifugation, dilution and filtration

  • reduction of dehydroascorbic acid to ascorbic acid in the presence of dithiothreitol solution (dissolved in the solution of potassium hydrogen phosphate)

HPLC-UV/VIS [46]

* Total value (ascorbic + dehydroascorbic acid); Non total value (only ascorbic acid) ** FW-Fresh Product Weight.

As the data indicate, the vitamin C content of mini kiwi fruit is extremely large (up to 300 mg/100 g FW), much larger than that of kiwi fruit (60–120 mg/100 g) and comparable to wild rose (250–800 mg/100 g), blackcurrants (150–300 mg/100 g) and sea buckthorn (200–600 mg/100 g) [47].

The variability declared by researchers results undoubtedly from the genetic differences, cultivation and storage conditions as well as the method of sample preparation.

As already stated the method of storing the fruit, including the temperature, is an important factor influencing the levels of active compounds, such as polyphenols and vitamin C, in A. arguta. For example, when stored at 1 °C, the ascorbic acid content initially increases and then drops rapidly. This process occurs much more slowly under ultra-low oxygen conditions (1.5% CO2 and 1.5% O2). Similar changes are observed for other compounds. Total phenolic content decreases drastically when the fruit is stored at room temperature (22 °C). Although their content fluctuates during storage, lowering the temperature helps to inhibit this process. The same applies to flavonoids, whose content remains fairly constant at 1 °C [45].

3. Biological and Health-Promoting Properties of A. arguta Fruits

As it was illustrated by the tables above, mini kiwi is an excellent source of bioactive compounds that is characterized by high levels of nutritional value. They give it unique health-promoting properties, indicating that mini kiwi should be a permanent part of the human diet [48].

The most valuable biological properties are briefly summarized below.

3.1. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant properties of compounds or mixtures are primarily related to their ability to protect the body against the negative effects of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [49,50]. This is directly related to protecting the body against oxidative stress, which has serious consequences for the living organism. There are various analytical techniques available for determining the antioxidant activity of biological samples, including food and plant extracts. The research on antioxidant properties can be generally divided into a-cellular and cellular assays.

3.1.1. A-Cellular Assays

Common methods in this group are spectrophotometric ones, in which antioxidant activity is a measure of a sample’s ability to neutralize radicals (such as the ABTS or DPPH methods), protection against oxidation of another molecule (e.g., ORAC, beta-carotene method), or the ability to reduce metal ions (e.g., FRAP or CUPRAC) [21]. According to the literature, extracts from mini kiwi fruit have been extensively studied, and antioxidant activity has been confirmed using the aforementioned methods. The paper [28] demonstrated that the extracts from the A. arguta fruits exhibit antioxidant properties (assessed using the DPPH method) weaker compared to those of A. kolomikta, A. purpurea, A. melanandra and A. macrosperma but slightly better than A. deliciosa. In the paper [22], the antioxidant properties of extracts obtained from various A. arguta cultivars were determined using four complementary tests: ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and CUPRAC. Although the results obtained using these four methods varied, they indicated a clear relationship between the polyphenol content and the antioxidant activity. The cultivars with the highest polyphenol content (‘Bidan’, ‘M1’, ‘Bingo’, ‘Anna’, and ‘Geneva’) exhibited the highest antioxidant activity. According to the paper [30], the hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity of mini kiwifruit proved to be much larger (5143.67 μmol VCE/100 g dry weight) than that of green kiwi berries (A. delicosa) (55.58 μmol VCE/100 g dry weight) as well as larger than that of apples (309.2 μmol VCE/100 g dry weight) and cranberries (1019.9 μmol VCE/100 g), where VCE is Vitamin C Equivalent. Furthermore, some Actinidia species, such as A. arguta, exhibited a larger antioxidant capacity, assessed using the FRAP method, compared to such vegetables as peppers, tomatoes, and spinach [51]. In all studied cases, differences in the antioxidant capacity of the studied Actinidia species, including A. arguta, can be tentatively attributed to different contents of polyphenols and ascorbic acid. Moreover, the antioxidant activity of fruits changes with the ripening time. Figiel-Kroczyńska et al. [52] found that the largest antioxidant properties (measured by the free radicals DPPH, ABTS•+, and iron reduction (FRAP) were exhibited increasingly with the content of anthocyanins and consequently with the intensity of the red color of the skin of ‘Issai’ and ‘Ken’s Red’ cultivars. Essential oils (AEOs) obtained from A. arguta fruits also exhibit antioxidant properties. The studies carried out by Wang et al. [34] showed that AEO exhibited the concentration-dependent DPPH radical scavenging activity (IC50 = 117.60 μg/mL), hydroxyl radical scavenging activity (IC50 = 35.15 μg/mL), and the ability to protect beta-carotene using the beta-carotene method (IC50 = 73.60 μg/mL). Unfortunately, in each case, the determined values were much lower than those for the standard antioxidants (BHT and BHA). The latter yielded much lower IC50 values, indicating larger antioxidant properties than the tested oils.

3.1.2. Cellular Assays

One of the methods for assessing the antioxidant activity is the Cellular Antioxidant Activity Assay (CAA). The active ingredients from the extracts are absorbed into cells, where they react with ROS intracellularly or by blocking peroxyl radicals generated at the cell membrane [30]. As follows from the papers [30,53], the CAA values for mini kiwifruit (72.83–250.78 μmol QE/100 g dry weight) were higher than for kiwifruit (55.68–121.72 μmol QE/100 g dry weight). This indicates that mini kiwifruit is a better source of antioxidants at the cellular level than kiwifruit.

3.2. Neuroprotective Properties

The neuroprotective effects of A. arguta in mice with the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropipridine (MPTP)-induced Parkinson’s disease model were investigated by Kitamura et al. [54], who administered A. arguta juice to 7-week-old mice continuously for 10 days before the first MPTP injection. Degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra was induced with MPTP (30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) once daily for five consecutive days. Based on this study, A. arguta ameliorates motor impairment and inhibits neuronal decline. The authors suggested that A. arguta can provide neuroprotection, thereby delaying or preventing the neurodegenerative process in Parkinson’s disease.

The ethyl acetate extract obtained from A. arguta fruit demonstrated protective and ameliorative effects on beta-amyloid (Aβ)-induced neurotoxicity and cognitive deficits in mice [55]. Furthermore, the extract enhanced the cholinergic system and inhibited the decline in the biochemical antioxidant activity in the mouse brain tissue. It also prevents mitochondrial dysfunction, which is associated with the inhibition of proapoptotic proteins. Based on these findings, this study suggests that the examined extract can be a potential substance for preventing Alzheimer’s disease by improving cognitive function [55,56]. In a study carried out by Jeong et al. 2020 [32], three mini kiwifruit cultivars (cv. ‘Mansu’ (A. arguta × A. deliciosa), cv. ‘Haeyeon’ (A. arguta), and cv. ‘Chiak’ (A. arguta) were proven to have a protective effect on the neuronal PC-12 and SHSY5Y cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide by increasing cell viability and reducing intracellular oxidative stress.

3.3. Anticholinergic Activity (In Vitro)

The human brain contains two main forms of cholinesterase, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) [57], which interrupt neurotransmission by hydrolyzing the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in neuronal cells. Cholinesterase inhibitors can improve neurotransmission by maintaining normal acetylcholine levels in cholinergic synapses. Acetylcholine plays a significant role in the learning process; its loss impairs memory in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, inhibiting cholinesterase activity is a fundamental treatment strategy for this neurodegenerative disease [58]. Three cultivars of mini kiwi were proven to have cholinesterase-inhibiting effects, suggesting that they may be an effective source of inhibitors in the human diet [32]. The extracts from the ‘Mansu’, ‘Haeyeon’, and ‘Chiak’ cultivars at a concentration of 400 μg/mL exhibited moderate AChE inhibitory activity, approximately 9.7%, 7.1%, and 6.0%, respectively, while their BChE inhibitory activity was approximately 6.1%, 3.4%, and 4.1%. The ‘Mansu’ cultivar exhibited larger AChE and BChE inhibitory activity than the other cultivars used in this study. The cholinesterase inhibitory activity of A. arguta ‘Geneva’ cultivar fruits was investigated by Wojdyło et al. [29]. In these studies, the percentage of AChE and BChE inhibition was 79.7 and 93.9, respectively. The results obtained for these enzymes were similar and correlated well with the total phenolic content. Among the polyphenols with the greatest ability to inhibit AChE were quercetin, kaempferol, myricetin, and phloretin, while the most effective BChE inhibitors were apigenin, luteolin, quercetin, phloretin, and cyanidin [59]. According to Sawicki et al. [60], the content of (+)-catechin and L-ascorbic acid in A. arguta fruit correlated with the anti-AChE parameter. The cholinesterase inhibitory potential of ‘Weiki’ cultivar fruits was assessed in untreated and high hydrostatic pressure-treated (450, 550 or 650 MPa for 5 or 15 min) samples. The study demonstrated that exposing the ‘Weiki’ cultivar to high pressure significantly improved the AChE inhibition. However, this increase is likely related to the increased concentration of certain polyphenols resulting from the processing [61].

3.4. Antitumor

The in vitro studies on the anticancer role of A. arguta fruit juice proved that it reduces methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-induced lung carcinogenesis. The juice components, including isoquercetin, affect both the initiation and growth/progression stages of carcinogenesis through antimutagenesis, stimulation of alkyl-DNA adduct repair, and suppression of AKT-mediated growth signaling [62]. The antimutagenic effect of hardy kiwi juice was also demonstrated in the studies [63], in which mini kiwi juice inhibited the mutagenicity of heterocyclic amines (MeIQx, Trp-P-2, and PhIP), aflatoxin B1 and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (benzo(a)pyrene and DMBA). Furthermore, it was proven that the mini kiwi juice inhibited formation of DNA adducts in the liver of mice whose diet contained deliberately tumor-initiating ingredients. It was confirmed that the juice components led to reduction in the number of existing skin tumors in mice [63]. Relatively well-studied anticancer components of A. arguta are its polysaccharides, which inhibit proliferation of Hep G2 cells by blocking the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis. The results of this study demonstrate that A. arguta polysaccharides can be a potential source of natural anticancer agents and could be used as a natural product with anticancer activity [64]. Mini kiwi, as a source of many active components (rutin, kaempferol, ferulic acid, vitamin C, vitamin E, etc.), has a potential impact on the glioblastoma multiforme. It demonstrates an inhibitory effect on cancer cell self-renewal, modulates signaling pathways involved in regulating cell phenotype and metabolism, and influences the consolidation of the tumor microenvironment [65].

3.5. Anti-Inflammatory Properties

The inflammatory process is the body’s crucial defense mechanism against pathogens (viruses or bacteria). However, chronic inflammation caused by the constant activation of macrophages can lead to serious adverse effects, like autoimmune diseases and cancer. Therefore, substances that can protect the body against inflammation, especially chronic inflammation, are being sought [66]. Numerous studies proved that the extracts from A. arguta fruit exhibit anti-inflammatory properties [67,68]. The anti-inflammatory effects of kiwiberry extracts were analyzed using the RAW 264.7 cells (macrophage-like cells derived from mice and widely used in studies of the immune system, inflammation, metabolism, and bone biology), in which inflammation was induced by LPS (a component of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria that acts as an endotoxin). The anti-inflammatory properties of the extracts were determined by measuring the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 (proinflammatory cytokines produced by the body) in the cell culture media. Inhibiting the pathway leading to the production of these cytokines can be a potential mechanism of anti-inflammatory activity. The authors found that the mini kiwi extracts significantly reduced the release of IL-6 and TNF-α in a dose-dependent manner [67]. In the paper, an aqueous extract derived from the fruit of A. arguta has been studied as an anti-inflammatory agent in humans and atopy-like animal models. The study of allergy-related cytokines from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) stimulated with the house dust mite allergen (DME) extract in dogs following the treatment with the A. arguta extract demonstrated effective inhibition of the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IFN-γ [68].

3.6. Antidiabetic Activity

Type 2 diabetes is considered a component of metabolic syndrome, defined as abnormal glucose tolerance with impaired glucose and lipid metabolism caused by disturbed insulin secretion or insulin resistance. One effective treatment for diabetes is inhibiting postprandial hyperglycemia by inhibiting or delaying the absorption of carbohydrates from meals. In the human body, dietary carbohydrates are hydrolyzed by pancreatic α-amylase and intestinal α-glucosidase, the enzymes responsible for the breakdown of oligosaccharides and disaccharides into digestible monosaccharides. To inhibit the postprandial hyperglycemia, inhibitors of these enzymes should be used [69].

The research carried out by Wojdyło et al. [29,33] confirmed that the A. arguta extracts are good inhibitors of α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Their efficacy was larger than that of the A. arguta × A. purpurea and A. arguta × A. melanandra extracts. The inhibitory activity of glucosidase increased from ‘Geneva’ (IC50 = 0.99) to ‘Weiki’ (IC50 = 0.42), while for α-amylase it increased from ‘Weiki’ through ‘Geneva’ and ‘Ananasnaja’ to ‘Jumbo’. This is consistent with the results obtained in our laboratory using the TLC-bioassays, in which 10 cultivars of A. arguta were compared in terms of their enzyme-inhibitory properties [70]. Furthermore, the results indicate that the tested A. arguta cultivars exhibited stronger activity than A. deliciosa.

3.7. Inhibitory Effect on Digestive Enzymes

One of the most important enzymes responsible for triglyceride digestion is pancreatic lipase. Inhibiting this enzyme is one way to inhibit or delay the digestion and absorption of triglycerides. The studies by Li et al. [31] demonstrated that the extracts obtained from various kiwifruit cultivars, including mini kiwifruit, exhibit varying levels of pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity. The IC50 values for the inhibitory effect on pancreatic lipase ranged from 3.12 ± 0.09 mg/mL to 7.44 ± 0.11 mg/mL among the tested kiwifruit. The authors attribute the obtained value differences to the varying contents of polyphenolic compounds, primarily proanthocyanidins and quercetin derivatives [71,72]. The best properties (and the lowest IC50 value) were obtained for A. chinensis cv. ‘Hongshi’ and the poorest for A. macrosperma. Among the tested extracts, A. arguta extract demonstrated relatively small lipase-inhibiting properties compared to the other tested extracts (IC50 around 6 mg/mL) but comparable to the commercially available drug orlistat (IC50 = 6.34 mg/mL). In turn, the studies carried out by Qiao et al. [73] on the extracts of kiwi berry (A. arguta (Sieb & Zucc) Planch. ex Miq. cv. ‘Longcheng No. 2’) demonstrated that the crude kiwi fruit extract exhibited a lipase-inhibiting activity, with an IC50 value of 21.13 mg/mL. This value was compared to that obtained for black chokeberry (IC50 = 83.45 mg/mL), allowing the authors to conclude that the mini kiwi fruit possesses a lipase-inhibiting potential.

3.8. Antiatherosclerotic Activity

Atherosclerosis is considered a multifactorial disease in which hyperlipidemia plays a significant role. It has long been believed that a proper diet, particularly one rich in fruits and vegetables, has a significant impact on the course of this disease as well as other cardiovascular diseases [74]. Atherosclerotic changes were found in experimental animals (rats, mice, and rabbits) when their diet was supplemented with cholesterol [75]. Leontowicz et al. [75] proved that a diet rich in various cultivars of mini kiwi fruit increased the antioxidant activity of blood plasma in rats, significantly reducing LDL levels and improving all lipid parameters. Thus, the studies confirmed that the mini kiwi fruits exhibit hypolipidemic and hypocholesterolemic effects. Furthermore, their anti-inflammatory properties protect the aortas and livers of rats loaded with exogenous cholesterol. As follows from the more detailed studies, dietary supplementation with the mini kiwifruit, particularly the ‘Geneva’ cultivar, reduces liver fat accumulation in hypercholesterolemic rats, likely by reducing the expression of key genes involved in cholesterol metabolism. Therefore, the mini kiwifruit could be used as a potential dietary component for cholesterol control [76]. This was confirmed by a pilot study carried out on 43 volunteers, which showed that, in humans, mini kiwi supplementation caused changes in metabolic parameters and a significant decrease in triglyceride levels [77].

3.9. Antimicrobial Properties

According to the study by Wang et al. [34], essential oil obtained from A. arguta fruit demonstrated a significant antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae but showed moderate effectiveness against Bacillus subtilis and Microsporum canis. However, the Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were not susceptible to the essential oils. The antibacterial activity of the fruit extracts from A. arguta cv. ‘Veresneva’ against the Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains was studied by Khromykh et al. [78]. The obtained results confirmed the known large bioactivity of Actinidia plants. The A. arguta fruit extracts demonstrated the largest inhibitory activity against the Gram-negative strains, such as E. coli B906 and P. aeruginosa B907, followed by the Gram-positive strains Micrococcus lysodeikticus 2665 and S. aureus B904. In the paper [79], the A. arguta fruit extract obtained under the optimized conditions of ultrasound-assisted extraction demonstrated a large antimicrobial activity against S. aureus (MIC = 32 mg/mL) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (MIC = 64 mg/mL). Additionally, it reduced the growth rate of E. coli. It should be noted that the antimicrobial activity also depended on the type of solvent (selectivity) used to prepare the extract as well as on the cultivation conditions and harvest date [80]. Generally, the study proved that methanol extracts from the kiwifruit demonstrated stronger antimicrobial activity compared to the ethanol extracts. The methanol extracts from the kiwifruit collected in 2017 demonstrated the strongest, taking into account the tested ones, antimicrobial activity against Vibrio parahemolyticus, Enterococcus faecalis, Salmonella typhimurium, and Proteus vulgaris (12.5 ± 0.7 mm). The ethanol extracts from kiwifruit (40 μL) collected in 2018 also demonstrated the largest antimicrobial activity against Listeria monocytogenes (13.5 ± 0.7 mm).

3.10. Antiallergic Activity

The antiallergic effect of the extract obtained from the A. arguta fruit in a mouse asthma model was investigated in the paper by Kim et al. [81]. To investigate the effect on asthma, mice were orally administered some substances to induce asthma symptoms. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, serum, and lung tissue were analyzed using various methods. The study found that the extract could alleviate asthma symptoms, including AHR and eosinophilia in the lungs. Making asthma symptoms more evident was accompanied by reduction in the IL-5 and IgE levels and an increase in the expression of heme oxidase-1 (potent anti-inflammatory enzyme in the alveolar inflammatory cells), as well as an increase in the mRNA levels of foxp3, TGF-b1, and IL-10, important markers of regulatory T cells, in lung tissue. Thus, the extract from the edible fruits of A. arguta controls various factors associated with the pathogenesis of allergy. Subsequent studies proved that the activity of the extract can be reproduced by mixing the chosen compounds present in them [82]. Individually or as mixtures, six chemical compounds (citric, quinic, and malic acids, myoinositol, isoquercitin, and 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde) were tested for their effects on the expression of various Th2 cytokines and inflammatory mediators in the cell-based assay. The mixtures reproduced the original activities of the extract to a significant extent. The studies proved that a significant antiallergic activity can be reproduced, both in vitro and in vivo. The six identified compounds will enable the future development of a new type of antiallergic drug.

Antiallergic effects were also observed in fatty acids isolated from the A. arguta fruits. The studies show that various compounds, such as linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, ethyl linoleate, ethyl linolenate, and ethyl stearate, isolated from the mini kiwi fruits, have potential as inhibitors of IL-4 production, which correlates with the occurrence of allergic diseases [83].

For the sake of scientific accuracy, it should be mentioned here that mini kiwi can also cause allergies, which is mainly due to a large content of the protein actinidin (cysteine protease) [84].

4. Review Methodology

The presented literature review was conducted by collecting, reviewing, and collating information (from 2003 to 2025, with a large preponderance of papers from the last 10 years) from available online databases, such as Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Science Direct. The search was made using keywords (“biological properties of Actinidia arguta,” “active compounds of Actinidia arguta,” “Actinidia arguta occurrence,” and “Actinidia arguta analysis”). The search was limited to papers in English. Furthermore, the abstracts were prescreened before the full text was analyzed. The literature review was thoroughly analyzed to summarize the general knowledge on A. arguta. The search results were reviewed individually by two authors.

5. Conclusions

A. arguta fruits are becoming increasingly common on the global consumer market, although they are not as common as A. deliciosa or A. chinensis. However, as the attempt was made to show, more and more publications appear on the subject of mini kiwi: its chemical composition, biologically active substances and health-promoting properties. Many papers also discuss the differences between various cultivars of A. arguta.

Our paper concerns fruits, which are particularly important from the consumer’s point of view. We have only mentioned that the subject of research should also include leaves, stems, and flowers, which can become a source of biologically active substances for the cosmetic, food and pharmaceutical industries. In particular, leaves, which are a rich source of polyphenols, are increasingly attracting the interest of researchers [85].

Our article focuses on A. arguta fruit analysis and highlights its rich bioactive components, which, in addition to its flavor, are responsible for its health-promoting properties. By putting greater emphasis on these properties and educating potential consumers about their benefits, it is expected that more and more people will appreciate and enjoy the taste of these small, inconspicuous fruits. The information contained in this review paper should contribute to the development of further research on A. arguta, which will likely lead to the isolation and identification of additional components in the future. Furthermore, undoubtedly, new research will result in a better and more effective understanding of pharmacological effects of mini kiwi, which will ultimately benefit humanity and contribute to the advancement of medical science.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Institute of Chemical Sciences of Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin for creating the research infrastructure, without which this research would not be possible.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

beta-Amyloid
ABTS 2,2′-Azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
AChE Acetylcholinesterase
AEO Actinidia arguta Essential Oil
AHR Airway Hyperresponsiveness
BChE Butyrylcholinesterase
BHA Butylated Hydroxyanisole
BHT Butylated Hydroxytoluene
CAA Cellular Antioxidant Activity Assay
CUPRAC Cupric Reducing Antioxidant Capacity
DAD Diode Array Detector
DHA L-dehydroascorbic acid
DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
DME Dust Mite Allergen Extract
DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid
DPPH 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
DTT Dithiothreitol
DW Dry Weight
EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid
FID Flame Ionization Detector
FL Fluorescence
Foxp3 Forkhead Transcription Factor
FRAP Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Parameter
FW Fresh Product Weight
HPLC High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
HS Headspace
IC50 Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration
IFN-γ Interferon-Gamma
IgE Immunoglobulin E
IL-4 Interleukin-4
IL-5 Interleukin-5
IL-6 Interleukin-6
IL-13 Interleukin-13
IMS Ion Mobility Spectrometry
LDL Low-Density Lipoprotein
LPS Lipopolysaccharide
MeIQx 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline
MIC Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
MPTP 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropipridine
mRNA Messenger Ribonucleic Acid
MS Mass Spectrometry
ORAC Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity
PBMCs Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
PDA Photo Diode Array
PhIP 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine
PTEF Polytetrafluoroethylene
QE Quercetin Equivalent
ROS Reactive Oxygen Species
TCA Trichloroacetic Acid
TGF-β1 Transforming Growth Factor beta 1
Th 2 Type 2 Lymphocyte
TLC Thin-Layer Chromatography
TNF-α Tumor Necrosis Factor α
TOF Time of Flight
Trp-P-2 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole
UPLC Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography
UV Ultraviolet
VIS Visible
VCE Vitamin C Equivalent

Author Contributions

I.M.C. and M.O.-T. have made equal contributions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Garcia-Herrera P., Maieves H.A., Vega E.N., Perez-Rodriguez M.L., Fernandez-Ruiz V., Iriondo-DeHond A., Castillo M.D.d., Sanchez-Mata M.C. Dwarf Kiwi (Actinidia arguta Miq.), a Source of antioxidants for a healthy and sustainable diet. Molecules. 2022;27:5495. doi: 10.3390/molecules27175495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khan M.U.A., Khan M.A., Abbasi U.A., Amin M., Kalsoom T., Basit A., Shahzad B. Kiwi plant growth monitoring with soil and climatic conditions in the Semi-Arid Region of Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022;23:36. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang H. History of 100 years of domestication and improvement of kiwi-fruit and gene discovery from genetic introgressed populations in the wild. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2009;44:127–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Richardson D.P., Ansell J., Drummond L.N. The nutritional and health attributes of kiwifruit: A review. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018;57:2659–2676. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1627-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ward C., Courtney D. Kiwifruit: Taking Its Place in the Global Fruit Bowl. In: Boland M., Moughan P.J., editors. Nutritional Benefits of Kiwifruit. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2013. pp. 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang H.W., Ferguson A.R. Actinidia in China: Natural diversity, phylogeographical evolution, interspecific gene flow and kiwifruit cultivar improvement. Acta Hortic. 2007;753:31–40. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.753.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xiao T., Jia T., Wu W., Peng J., Pan L., Zhu X., Liu T., Cheng J., Wang H., Xiao L., et al. Collection, Evaluation, and New Cultivar Breeding of Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis in Wudang Mountains, China. Horticulturae. 2025;11:739. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae11070739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Di Canito A., Altomare A., Giuggioli N., Foschino R., Fracassetti D., Vigentini I. From fruit to beverage: Investigating Actinidia species for characteristics and potential in alcoholic drink production. Foods. 2024;13:2380. doi: 10.3390/foods13152380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Latocha P. Actinidia arguta—A valuable species with high decorative values and commercial potential. Rocz. Pol. Tow. Dendrol. 2019;67:61–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang H. The Genus Actinidia: A World Monograph. Science Press; Beijing, China: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Northeast IPM Center . Hardy Kiwi Handbook. Berkshire Environmental Action Team; Ithaca, NY, USA: 2019. [(accessed on 12 October 2025)]. Available online: https://www.northeastipm.org/neipm/assets/File/Publications/Hardy-kiwi-handbook.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li J., Li X.W., Soejarto D.D. Actinidiaceae. In: Wu C.Y., Raven P., editors. Flora of China. Science Press; Beijing, China: Missouri Botanical Garden Press; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2007. pp. 334–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Debersaques F., Mekers O. Growth and Production of Kiwifruit and Kiwiberry. In: Verheye W.H., editor. Soils, Plant Growth and Crop Production. Volume II Eolss Publishers; Oxford, UK: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lim T.K. Edible Medicinal and Non-Medicinal Plants. Volume I Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2012. Actinidiaceae, Actinidia Arguta. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bieniek A. Yield, morphology and biological value of fruits of Actinidia arguta and Actinidia purpurea and some of their hybrid cultivars grown in north-eastern Poland. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus. 2012;11:117–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Drzewiecki J., Latocha P., Leontowicz H., Leontowicz M., Park J.S., Najman K., Weisz M., Ezra A., Gorinstein S. Analytical Methods Applied to Characterization of Actinidia arguta, Actinidia deliciosa, and Actinidia eriantha Kiwi Fruit Cultivars. Food Anal Methods. 2016;9:1353–1366. doi: 10.1007/s12161-015-0309-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wu D.-T., Liu W., Han Q.-H., Du G., Li H.-Y., Yuan Q., Fu Y., Zhao L., Zhang Q., Li S.-Q., et al. Physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant activities of non-starch polysaccharides from different kiwifruits. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;136:891–900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang H., Teng K., Zang H. Actinidia arguta (Sieb. et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq.: A review of phytochemistry and pharmacology. Molecules. 2023;28:7820. doi: 10.3390/molecules28237820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ding Y.P., Wang M.Z., Liu Y.X., Skrypchenko N.V., Liu D.J. Research progress on product development and utilization of Actinidia arguta. Food Ferment. Ind. 2023;49:308–314. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ataie A., Shadifar M., Ataee R. Polyphenolic antioxidants and neuronal regeneration. Basic. Clin. Neurosci. 2015;7:81–90. doi: 10.15412/J.BCN.03070201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Christodoulou M.C., Orellana Palacios J.C., Hesami G., Jafarzadeh S., Lorenzo J.M., Domínguez R., Moreno A., Hadidi M. spectrophotometric methods for measurement of antioxidant activity in food and pharmaceuticals. Antioxidants. 2022;11:2213. doi: 10.3390/antiox11112213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leontowicz H., Leontowicz M., Latocha P., Jesion I., Park Y.-S., Katrich E., Nemirovski A., Gorinstein S. Bioactivity and nutritional properties of hardy kiwi fruit Actinidia arguta in comparison with Actinidia deliciosa ‘Hayward’ and Actinidia eriantha‘Bidan. Food Chem. 2016;196:281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matich A.J., Young H., Allen J.M., Wang M.Y., Fieldera S., McNeilag M.A., MacRae E.A. Actinidia arguta: Volatile compounds in fruit and flower. Phytochemistry. 2003;63:285–301. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00142-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Song M., Xu H., Xin G., Liu C., Sun X., Zhi Y., Li B., Shen Y. Comprehensive evaluation of Actinidia arguta fruit based on the nutrition and taste: 67 germplasm native to Northeast China. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness. 2022;11:393–404. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2021.11.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Latocha P., Łata B., Jankowski P. Variation of chemical composition and antioxidant properties of kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta) in a three-year study. Molecules. 2023;28:455. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.He Y., Qin H., Wen J., Cao W., Yan Y., Sun Y., Yuan P., Sun B., Fan S., Lu W., et al. Characterization of key compounds of organic acids and aroma volatiles in fruits of different Actinidia argute resources based on High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Headspace Gas Chromatography–Ion Mobility Spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) Foods. 2023;12:3615. doi: 10.3390/foods12193615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wen J., Wang Y., He Y., Shu N., Cao W., Sun Y., Yuan P., Sun B., Yan Y., Qin H., et al. Flavor quality analysis of ten Actinidia arguta fruits based on High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Headspace Gas Chromatography–Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Molecules. 2023;28:7559. doi: 10.3390/molecules28227559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Latocha P., Krupa T., Wołosiak R., Worobiej E., Wilaczak J. Antioxidant activity and chemical difference in fruit of different Actinidia sp. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010;61:381–394. doi: 10.3109/09637480903517788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wojdyło A., Nowicka P. Anticholinergic effects of Actinidia arguta fruits and their polyphenol content determined by liquid chromatography-photodiode array detector quadrupole/time of flight-mass spectrometry (LC-MS-PDA-Q/TOF) Food Chem. 2019;271:216–223. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim J.G., Beppu K., Kataoka I. Varietal differences in phenolic content and astringency in skin and flesh of hardy kiwifruit resources in Japan. Sci. Hortic. 2009;120:551–554. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li H.-Y., Yuan Q., Yang Y.-L., Han Q.-H., He J.L., Zhao L., Zhang Q., Liu S.-X., Lin D.-R., Wu D.-T., et al. Phenolic Profiles, antioxidant capacities, and inhibitory effects on digestive enzymes of different kiwifruits. Molecules. 2018;23:2957. doi: 10.3390/molecules23112957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jeong H.-R., Kim K.-J., Lee S.G., Cho H.S., Cho J.S., Kim D.-O. Phenolic Profiles of hardy kiwifruits and their neuroprotective effects on PC-12 and SH-SY5Y cells against oxidative stress. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020;30:912–919. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2001.01047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wojdyło A., Nowicka P., Oszmiański J., Golis T. Phytochemical compounds and biological effects of Actinidia fruits. J. Funct. Foods. 2017;30:194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang H., Quan H., Sun T., Wang Z., Yang Y. Chemical composition, antimicrobial, and antioxidant cytotoxic activities of essential oil from Actinidia arguta. Arch. Microbiol. 2022;204:239. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-02775-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Doseděl M., Jirkovský E., Macáková K., Krčmová L.K., Javorská L., Pourová J., Mercolini L., Remião F., Nováková L., MLaděnka P. Vitamin C—Sources, physiological role, kinetics, deficiency, use, toxicity, and determination. Nutrients. 2021;13:615. doi: 10.3390/nu13020615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Padayatty S.J., Levine M. Vitamin C: The known and the unknown and Goldilocks. Oral. Dis. 2016;22:463–493. doi: 10.1111/odi.12446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gęgotek A., Skrzydlewska E. Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activity of ascorbic acid. Antioxidants. 2022;11:1993. doi: 10.3390/antiox11101993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alberts A., Moldoveanu E.-T., Niculescu A.-G., Grumezescu A.M. Vitamin C: A comprehensive review of its role in health, disease prevention, and therapeutic potential. Molecules. 2025;30:748. doi: 10.3390/molecules30030748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Naidu K.A. Vitamin C in human health and disease is still a mystery? An overview. Nutrition J. 2003;2:7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-2-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Latocha P. The nutritional and health benefits of kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta)—A Review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2017;72:325–334. doi: 10.1007/s11130-017-0637-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Łata B., Wołosiak R., Majewska E., Druzyńska B., Piecyk M., Najman K., Sadowska A., Latocha P. Physicochemical Changes and Antioxidant Metabolism of Actinidia arguta Fruit (Kiwiberry) Under Various Cold-Storage Conditions. Molecules. 2025;30:3742. doi: 10.3390/molecules30183742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nishiyama I., Yamashita Y., Yamanaka M., Shimohashi A., Fukuda T., Oota T. Varietal difference in vitamin C content in the fruit of kiwifruit and other actinidia species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52:5472–5475. doi: 10.1021/jf049398z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Latocha P., Wołosiak R., Worobiej E., Krupa T. Clonal differences in antioxidant activity and bioactive constituents of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta) and its year-to-year variability. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013;93:1412–1419. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pukszta T. The Actinidia Arguta ‘hortgem thai’ and Actinidia deliciosa ‘hayward’ kiwi fruit as a source of exogenous antioxidants. Sci. J. Gdyn. Marit. Univ. 2021;120:48–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Krupa T., Klimek K., Zaraś-Januszkiewicz E. Nutritional values of minikiwi fruit (Actinidia arguta) after storage: Comparison between DCA New Technology and ULO and CA. Molecules. 2022;27:4313. doi: 10.3390/molecules27134313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin Y., Zhao B., Tang H., Cheng L., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Fan J., Li M., Chen Q., Luo Y., et al. L-ascorbic acid metabolism in two contrasting hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta) cultivars during fruit development. Sci. Hortic. 2022;297:110940. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.110940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vissers M.C.M., Carr A.C., Pullar J.M., Bozonet S.M. Chapter Seven—The Bioavailability of Vitamin C from Kiwifruit. In: Boland J., Moughan P.J., editors. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. Vol. 68. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2013. pp. 125–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pinto D., Delerue-Matos C., Rodriques F. Bioactivity, phytochemical profile and pro-healthy properties of Actinidia arguta: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020;136:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Olszowy M. What is responsible for antioxidant properties of polyphenolic compounds from plants? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019;144:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shields H.J., Traa A., Van Raamsdonk J.M. Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Reactive Oxygen Species on Lifespan: A comprehensive review of comparative and experimental studies. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;11:628157. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.628157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Halvorsen B.L., Holte K., Myhrstad M.C., Barikmo I., Hvattum E., Remberg S.F., Blomhoff R. A systematic screening of total antioxidants in dietary plants. J. Nutr. 2002;132:461–471. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.3.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Figiel-Kroczyńska M., Ochmian I., Lachowicz S., Krupa-Małkiewicz M., Wróbel J., Gamrat R. Actinidia (mini kiwi) fruit quality in relation to summer cutting. Agronomy. 2021;11:964. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11050964. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Saeed K.M., You L.J., Chen C., Zhao Z.G., Fu X., Liu R.H. Comparative assessment of phytochemical profiles and antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of kiwifruit (A. deliciosa) cultivars. J. Food Biochem. 2019;43:e13025. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.13025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kitamura Y., Sakanashi M., Ozawa A., Saeki Y., Nakamura A., Hara Y., Saeki K., Arimoto-Kobayashi S. Protective effect of Actinidia arguta in MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease model mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021;555:154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ha J.S., Kim J.M., Park S.K., Kang J.Y., Lee D.S., Lee U., Kim D.-K., Choi S.-U., Heo H.J. Anti-amyloidogenic properties of an ethyl acetate fraction from Actinidia arguta in Aβ1–42-induced ICR mice. Food Func. 2018;9:3264–3277. doi: 10.1039/C8FO00287H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ha J.S., Jin D.E., Park S.K., Park C.A., Seung T.W., Bae D.W., Kim D.-K., Heo H.J. Antiamnesic effect of Actinidia arguta extract intake in a mouse model of TMT-induced learning and memory dysfunction. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat Med. 2015;2015:876484. doi: 10.1155/2015/876484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nordberg A., Ballard C., Bullock R., Darreh-Shori T., Somogyi M. A review of butyrylcholinesterase as a therapeutic target in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013;15:26731. doi: 10.4088/PCC.12r01412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Moreira N.C.D.S., Lima J.E.B.F., Marchiori M.F., Carvalho I., Sakamoto-Hojo E.T. Neuroprotective effects of cholinesterase inhibitors: Current scenario in therapies for Alzheimer’s disease and future perspectives. J. Alzheimers Dis. Rep. 2022;18:177–193. doi: 10.3233/ADR-210061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Szwajgier D. Anticholinesterase activities of selected polyphenols—A short report. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2013;64:59–64. doi: 10.2478/v10222-012-0089-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sawicki T., Błaszczak W., Latocha P. In vitro anticholinergic and antiglycaemic properties of frost-hardy Actinidia fruit extracts and their polyphenol profile, L-ascorbic acid content and antioxidant capacity. Food Res. Int. 2023;173:113324. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Błaszczak W., Latocha P., Jeż M., Wiczkowski W. The impact of high-pressure processing on the polyphenol profile and anti-glycaemic, anti-hypertensive and anti-cholinergic activities of extracts obtained from kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta) fruits. Food Chem. 2021;343:128421. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Takata J., Miyake N., Saiki Y., Tada M., Sasaki K., Kubo T., Kiura K., Arimoto-Kobayashi S. Chemopreventive effects and anti-tumorigenic mechanisms of Actinidia arguta, known as sarunashi in Japan toward 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK)- induced lung tumorigenesis in a/J mouse. Genes. Environ. 2022;9:26. doi: 10.1186/s41021-022-00255-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nishimura M., Okimasu Y., Miyake N., Tada M., Hida R., Negishi T., Arimoto-Kobayashi S. Inhibitory effect of Actinidia arguta on mutagenesis, inflammation and two-stage mouse skin tumorigenesis. Genes. and Environ. 2016;38:25. doi: 10.1186/s41021-016-0053-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yu X., Liu C., Liu Y., Tan C., Liu Y. Actinidia arguta polysaccharide induces apoptosis in Hep G2 Cells. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;7:857–863. doi: 10.19026/ajfst.7.2522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Macedo K., Costa P.C., Rodrigues F. Bioactive compounds from Actinidia arguta fruit as a new strategy to fight glioblastoma. Food Res. Int. 2024;175:113770. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kim H.-Y., Hwang K.W., Park S.-Y. Extracts of Actinidia arguta stems inhibited LPS-induced inflammatory responses through nuclear factor–κB pathway in Raw 264.7 cells. Nutr. Res. 2014;34:1008–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.An X., Lee S.G., Kang H., Heo H.J., Cho Y.-S., Kim D.-O. Antioxidant and anti-Inflammatory effects of various cultivars of kiwi berry (Actinidia arguta) on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 Cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;26:1367–1374. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1603.03009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lee Y.-U., Park S.-H., Nam E.-H., Chung T.-H., Hwang C.-Y. Modulatory effects of PG102 (Actinidia arguta) on inflammatory cytokine mRNA expression in canine atopic dermatitis. Thai J. Vet. Med. 2016;46:9. doi: 10.56808/2985-1130.2779. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Regufe V.M.G., Pinto C.M.C.B., Perez P.M.V.H.C. Metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetic patients: A review of current evidence. Porto Biomed. J. 2020;5:e101. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Siwek D. Master’s Thesis. Maria Curie-Skłodowska University; Lublin, Poland: 2025. Health-Promoting Properties of Different Cultivars of Mini Kiwi. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sakulnarmrat K., Konczak I. Composition of native Australian herbs polyphenolic-rich fractions and in vitro inhibitory activities against key enzymes relevant to metabolic syndrome. Food Chem. 2012;134:1011–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sergent T., Vanderstraeten J., Winand J., Beguin P., Schneider Y.J. Phenolic compounds and plant extracts as potential natural anti-obesity substances. Food Chem. 2012;135:68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Qiao J., Guo L., Yang J., Gao R., Ni Y., Huo J., Huang D., Sui X., Zhang Y. Unveiling the polyphenol profile and bioactive potential of kiwi berry (Actinidia arguta): Antioxidant capacity and enzyme inhibition activities. Food Chem. 2025;471:142839. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.142839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bekbossynova M., Saliev T., Ivanova-Razumova T., Andossova S., Kali A., Myrzakhmetova G. Beyond cholesterol: Emerging risk factors in atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Med. 2025;14:2352. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Leontowicz M., Leontowicz H., Jesion I., Bielecki W., Najman K., Latocha P., Park Y.-S., Gorinstein S. Actinidia arguta supplementation protects aorta and liver in rats with induced hypercholesterolemia. Nutr. Res. 2016;36:1231–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gorji A.E., Ciecierska A., Leontowicz H., Roudbari Z., Sadkowski T. Impact of kiwifruit consumption on cholesterol metabolism in rat liver: A gene expression analysis in induced hypercholesterolemia. Nutrients. 2024;16:3999. doi: 10.3390/nu16233999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Popiolek-Kalisz J., Glibowski P., Solarska E. Supplementation of nutraceuticals from dwarf kiwi and apple improves lipid profile in overweight adults. Appl. Sci. 2024;14:1324. doi: 10.3390/app14041324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Khromykh N.O., Lykholat Y.V., Didur O.O., Sklyar T.V., Davydov V.R., Lavrentieva K.V., Lykholat T.Y. Phytochemical profiles, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Actinidia polygama and A. arguta fruits and leaves. Biosyst. Divers. 2022;30:39–45. doi: 10.15421/012205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Macedo K., Silva A.M., Ferreira A.S., de la Luz Cádiz-Gurrea M., Fernández-Ochoa Á., Segura-Carretero A., Delerue-Matos C., Costa P., Rodrigues F. Insights into the polyphenols extraction from Actinidia arguta fruit (kiwiberry): A source of pro-healthy compounds. Sci. Hortic. 2023;313:111910. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Otağ M.R., Kalkan S., Engin M.S. Determination of the phenolic compound profile, antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity of Siberian kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta) grown in Trabzon region. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021;25:362–376. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kim D., Kim S.H., Park E.-J., Kang C.-Y., ChO S.-H. and. Kim, S. Anti-allergic effects of PG102, a water-soluble extract prepared from Actinidia arguta, in a murine ovalbumin-induced asthma model. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2009;39:280–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kim D., Choi J., Kim M.-J., Kim S.H., Cho S.H., Kim S. Reconstitution of anti-allergic activities of PG102 derived from Actinidia arguta by combining synthetic chemical compounds. Exp. Biol. Med. 2013;238:631–640. doi: 10.1177/1535370213489455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Park H.M., Son M.W., Kim D., Kim S.-H., Kim S.-H., Kwon H.C., Kim S.Y. Fatty acid components of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta) as IL-4 production inhibitor. Biomol. Ther. 2011;19:126–133. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2011.19.1.126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Maddumage R., Nieuwenhuizen N.J., Bulley S.M., Cooney J.M., Green S.A., Atkinson R.G. Diversity and relative levels of actinidin, kiwellin, and thaumatin like allergens in 15 varieties of kiwifruit (Actinidia) J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013;61:728–739. doi: 10.1021/jf304289f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Almeida D., Pinto D., Santos J., Vinha A.F., Palmeira J., Ferreira H.N., Rodrigues F., Oliveira M.B.P. Hardy kiwifruit leaves (Actinidia arguta): An extraordinary source of value-added compounds for food industry. Food Chem. 2018;259:113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.


Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES