Abstract
Wild species have been extensively used as a reservoir of genetic variability in plant breeding. Both blueberries and cranberries are crops from the highly diverse Vaccinium genus that have benefited from interspecific hybridizations throughout their domestication history. In this review, we compiled all documented interspecific hybridizations performed for blueberry and cranberry aiming to guide future breeding efforts. We report the traits of interest, success and failure of crosses, and give the taxonomic sections of the species involved. Out of the 500 species listed in Vaccinium, only 42 have been tested for hybridization so far. Successful crosses with fertile progenies have been reported across distantly related sections. Considering the polyphyletic nature of Vaccinium, the definition of crop wild relatives for these crops could be expanded to incorporate other genera. This review highlights the enormous potential of the wild gene pools for breeding of Vaccinium berry crops, and the need to characterize these species and establish germplasm collections to face the agricultural challenges ahead.
Introduction
The genus Vaccinium is renowned for economically important crops, particularly blueberries (Vaccinium spp. sect. Cyanococcus) and cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon sect. Oxycoccus). Part of the Ericaceae family, subfamily Vaccinoideae, and tribe Vaccinieae, the genus is comprised of ~500 species across 29 taxonomic sections, each with diverse foliage, flowers, and fruits, offering vast potential for horticultural and ornamental use [1, 2]. Coveted for their high nutritional value, Vaccinium crops are becoming increasingly demanded in the global market, and therefore, require consistent genetic improvement to meet ongoing production and quality requirements [3, 4].
Historically, breeding programs for Vaccinium crops have used the genetic diversity of wild relatives to enhance breeding populations. A notable example was an interspecific hybridization of the Northern Highbush Blueberry (NHB), with primarily Vaccinium corymbosum background, and the Florida native Vaccinium darrowii [5–7]. The incorporation of low-chill requirement from V. darrowii enabled the hybrids to thrive in diverse climates and created a novel industry of Southern Highbush Blueberry (SHB), transforming blueberries into a now global crop [8]. This example underscores the value of evaluating wild Vaccinium species for crop improvement.
The complex taxonomy of Vaccinium convolutes the definition of blueberry and cranberry’s true Crop Wild Relatives (CWRs). Currently, the CWR definition arbitrarily encompasses just Vaccinium species for both blueberry and cranberry, but the known polyphyly of the Vaccinium genus has crucial implications for potential interspecific hybridizations, possibly resulting in an underestimate of available diversity for breeding efforts [9, 10].
Despite the deployment of interspecific hybrids for improvement of Vaccinium berry crops for over a century, a comprehensive list of species used for breeding and their outcomes remains outdated in the literature. The most recent review on interspecific hybridization in Vaccinium dates to 2009 [11], leaving a gap in our knowledge of subsequent advancements. Additionally, unlike previous reviews that took a descriptive approach, this review aims to systematically explore the history of wild species introgression in Vaccinium crop improvement through objective query-based screening of the literature. Furthermore, we synthesize the information gathered from the literature with novel phylogenetic findings to draw conclusions about the future potential hybridizations.
With the rapid development of blueberry and, to a lesser extent, cranberry globalization, an increasing number of highly adaptable cultivars with novel traits are urgently needed [12]. However, while there are many well-documented sources of the use of wild species, there are still major problems to overcome such as the fragmented information about interspecific hybridization throughout history, incomplete understanding of the true CWR, and lack of characterization for most wild relatives, especially those in the tropics. To address these gaps, we set two main objectives for this review: (i) to compile all artificial interspecific hybridizations documented for Vaccinium crop breeding, highlighting both successes and failures, and (ii) to leverage botanical knowledge, including phylogenetic relationships, to refine the CWR definition for blueberry and cranberry. Notably, this review will not only assess past progress but also highlight the challenges and future potential of wild species in Vaccinium breeding.
Interspecific hybridization in Vaccinium crops
The Vaccinium genus is home to many economically important species. These range from purely wild species, managed wild species, to domesticated crops grown commercially. In this section we will discuss mostly the domesticated groups as breeding efforts have involved interspecific hybridization. Studying interspecific and intersectional hybridization can contribute to our knowledge of the primary, secondary, and tertiary gene pools. This historical perspective can also guide future breeding efforts by highlighting successes and failures across the phylogenetic tree.
Interspecific hybridization of Vaccinium species is possible due to the same base number of chromosomes (n = 12) and high genomic collinearity [8]. Ploidy levels, however, are various across the genus, with natural occurrences of diploids, tetraploids, and hexaploids, sometimes within the same species. Some species or individuals are also known to produce a high frequency of unreduced (2n) gametes that facillitate crossing across differing ploidy levels [13, 14]. An effective artificial method that has been used to overcome this crossing barrier is colchicine chromosome doubling [15, 16]. Chu and Lyrene [17] provide a detailed overview of polyploid induction for Vaccinium interspecific hybridization in a recent review. Vaccinium species also tend to be self-incompatible, which facilitates easier crossing as emasculation of flowers is not always required to obtain hybrids. Non-emasculation can even aid in the success of a cross as ethelyne release is induced by emasculation and impacts fruit set negatively [18]. Nonetheless, flowers are easy to emasculate and in an intraspecific cross, pollinating one stigma can produce up to 50 viable seeds. The reasons outlined above contribute to the successes of interspecific hybridization in this group.
In this systematic review, we used a total of 64 sources, yielding 271 reported crosses between 1937 and 2023 involving 42 different Vaccinium species across 15 sections resulting in 136 unique species combinations (Table S1). Out of these, 53% were intrasectional and 47% were intersectional crosses. In 88% of the crosses, progeny was reported to be obtained and of those, 38% were reported at least partially fertile. Of those that reported the direction (54%), 58% performed reciprocal crosses compared to 42% one way. In addition, many crosses were between different ploidy levels (41%), and of those, colchicine for chromosome doubling was only reported to be used 11% of the time. The details and outcomes are presented below by Vaccinium section.
Intrasectional hybridization
True blueberries (sect. Cyanococcus)
Blueberry is a common name used for several species. However, ‘true blueberries’ are native to North America, and belong to Vaccinium sect. Cyanococcus. The species inside this section are further split into two main categories of domesticated species: Highbush Blueberry (V. corymbosum), and Rabbiteye Blueberry (Vaccinium ashei). Wild stands of Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) have not been genetically improved, but they are still considered commercially valuable and are treated as a cultivated crop [19]. Taxonomically, section Cyanococcus is monophyletic, with all species sharing a common ancestor [1, 9, 20]. Given the short divergence periods, intermediate forms and sexual compatibility are prevalent within Cyanococcus, which lacks sterility barriers between homoploids [10, 21, 22]. The close relatedness and overlapping habitats of Cyanococcus species facilitates viability of natural and artificial hybrids. Breeders have exploited this to form a secondary gene pool in highbush blueberries.
The domestication of highbush blueberry began with interspecific hybridization. In 1908, USDA botanist Frederick Coville and cranberry grower Elizabeth Coleman White initiated domestication attempts by crossing elite wild accessions of two tetraploid species, V. corymbosum and V. angustifolium, in New Jersey [23–25]. Coville’s early experiments also included other wild species such as Vaccinium myrtilloides, Vaccinium fuscatum, Vaccinium pallidum, Vaccinium myrsinites, and Vaccinium hirsutum. Since all these species belong to section Cyanococcus, interspecific crosses at the tetraploid level produced viable progeny [23]. Among the 15 cultivars Coville released, six were of interspecific hybrid descent: ‘Greenfield’, ‘Rancocas’, ‘June’, ‘Redskin’, ‘Catawba’, and ‘Weymouth’ [23, 24]. Including the original crosses reported by Coville, V. angustifolium was reported as a parent 25 times in the literature (Fig. 1a). Consequently, V. angustifolium is likely present in the majority of modern highbush blueberry germplasm, which have mostly started with Coville’s materials [11].
Figure 1.
Vaccinium species used in interspecific crosses documented in the literature. (a) Counts of species reported as a parent. (b) Heatmap of the frequency of crosses between species and failure outcome. Colors in the x- and y-axes represent the taxonomic section of the species. (c) Timeline of hybridization reports across the Vaccinium genus. Different colors represent the sections of parents.
In the 1950s, Ralph Sharpe from the University of Florida furthered the hybrid nature of the northern-adapted highbush blueberry using the southern native diploid and hexaploid species, V. darrowii and V. ashei, respectively. The introgression of these low-chill species improved adaptability to warmer climates [5–7]. Initially, the strong triploid block when crossing V. corymbosum (4×) with V. darrowii (2×) posed a challenge for interploid crosses. Luckily, a V. darrowii wild accession (‘Fla4B’) producing a natural high frequency of unreduced gametes was discovered, facilitating the production of tetraploid hybrids. From 1600 flowers pollinated, 31 tetraploid V. corymbosum × V. darrowii hybrids were produced [6]. Additionally, a few tetraploid offspring resulted from crossing diploid V. darrowii with hexaploid V. ashei [6]. To a lesser extent, the diploid Vaccinium tenellum also contributed to the low-chill germplasm [26]. These pivotal hybrids led to the development of a split between northern and southern highbush blueberry germplasm. Vaccinium darrowii and V. ashei are prominently cited in literature as parents, appearing 50 and 29 times, respectively (Fig. 1a).
The horticultural community has long considered V. ashei and Vaccinium virgatum synonyms, though recent work from Fritsch et al. [27] found them as distinct species. Due to this common misconception, we can consider the 20 V. virgatum citations conflating with V. ashei’s, possibly increasing this group’s involvement to 49 citations (Fig. 1a).
The southeastern USA boasts a greater diversity of Vaccinium species compared to the northeast, offering breeders a wider range of locally adapted species for breeding. Besides V. darrowii and V. ashei, other species such as V. fuscatum, Vaccinium elliottii, V. myrsinites, and more distantly related species Vaccinium arboreum (sect. Batodendron) and Vaccinium stamineum (sect. Polycodium) have all been crossed with highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum) as depicted in Fig. 1b.
Vaccinium elliottii (sect. Cyanococcus), or Mayberry, has been notably referenced with 25 citations (Fig. 1a). Its first use was reported by Darrow and Camp in 1945, with subsequent significant contributions by the breeders Paul Lyrene and Jim Ballington. V.accinium elliottii, a diploid species native to the southeastern USA, is prized for its small berries with pleasant flavor, early flowering, short fruit development period, and upland soil adaptation [28]. The offspring of these interspecific hybrids resulted in cultivars ‘Carteret’ from North Carolina State University and ‘Snowchaser’ from the University of Florida [11]. Two strategies have been employed to overcome its crossing barrier into tetraploid highbush cultivars: relying on natural unreduced gamete production [29] or using colchicine to double the chromosome count [10, 30, 31].
Other Cyanococcus species used less frequently in breeding, listed by their frequency of reports in parentheses, include V. fuscatum (19), Vaccinium formosum (18), V. myrsinites (13), V. myrtilloides (13), Vaccinium constablei (12), V. pallidum (10), V. tenellum (9), Vaccinium altomantanum (7), Vaccinium boreale (6), V. hirsutum (3), Vaccinium simulatum (3), and Vaccinium arkansanum (2). This demonstrates that all species within Cyanococcus have been tested for breeding purposes, but not all combinations resulted in successful progenies, possibly due to limited attempts (Fig. 1b).
Cranberry (sect. Oxycoccus)
Compared to blueberries, intrasectional hybrids for cranberry improvement within sect. Oxycoccus have been significantly more limited. This is likely due to the fewer species in Oxycoccus compared to Cyanococcus. Three species are reported in this subgenus: V. macrocarpon (2n = 2x = 24), Vaccinium oxycoccos (2n = 4x = 48), and Vaccinium microcarpum (2n = 2x = 24), with the last two sometimes lumped into just V. oxycoccos despite being two different ploidy levels [32, 33]. This taxonomy was corrected according to [34] to rename all diploid V. oxycoccos to V. microcarpum. Despite the limited gene pool in the section, cranberry breeders often use wild selections of V. macrocarpon and V. microcarpum in their breeding programs. Vaccinium oxycoccos in its tetraploid form has not been cited as a parent, due to incompatibility issues between diploid cranberry cultivars and a tetraploid wild species.
Cranberry was domesticated in the 1820s in Massachusetts, USA, but unlike blueberry, no breeding occurred initially—growers only planted wild selections [4]. It was not until 1929 that active breeding for cranberries began, still using only selections of V. macrocarpon [4]. Interspecific hybridization did not occur until 1975 [35].
Christ [35] reported using V. microcarpum (reported as diploid V. oxycoccos but corrected for taxonomic consistency) to introgress early blooming into cranberry. Only two more reports of V. macrocarpon × V. microcarpum hybrids have since been documented by Vorsa [26, 36]. In summary, V. microcarpum is cited for contributing traits such as early bloom, hardiness, and a unique profile of anthocyanins [26, 35, 36]. There have only been five references of V. microcarpum as a parent (Fig. 1a). In contrast to blueberry, no interspecific hybrids between species of sect. Oxycoccus have resulted in cranberry cultivars of commercial importance, and their applications have been limited to genetic studies. As expected, most of the hybridization involving V. macrocarpon are wide hybrids aiming to extend beyond sect. Oxycoccus.
Intersectional wide hybridization
Wide hybridization, also defined as intersectional hybrids, are those that tap into the tertiary gene pool comprised of species that are more distantly related and from different taxonomic sections. These hybridization events, when successful, can harness greater genetic diversity across the genus.
As visualized in Fig. 1b, cross frequency clusters around sect. Cyanococcus. While 49% of the reported crosses are intrasectional Cyanococcus, 47% are intersectional over a total of 15 sections. The first reports of intersectional hybridization are from the thesis work of Schultz [37] in which taxonomic relationships were inferred from crossing experiments involving Vaccinium species across six sections, Cyanococcus, Myrtillus, Oxycoccus, Pyxothamnus, Vaccinium, and Vitis-idaea (Fig. 1c). Of the 128 intersectional crosses, 18 were reported as having no progeny obtained, and therefore, failed crosses. Twelve wide hybrid combinations were complete failures and have no reported success, yet all but one combination have only been tested once (Fig. 1c).
Wide hybrids are more difficult to obtain due to elusive reproductive barriers beyond ploidy level differences. Despite sharing a base chromosome number (n = 12) and having highly syntenic genomes across all known species [38, 39], there are still cases of cross failure with the reproductive barriers unknown. Factors influencing wide hybrid success in Vaccinum have been speculated to include cross direction [40], genetic variation of parental species [10], and genome balance requirements [41]. Furthermore, crosses made at the tetraploid level are more likely to be successful due to the resulting ‘allotetraploidy’ that can buffer genomic conflicts [42] and aid in regaining fertility [43].
In other plant species, the intrinsic mechanisms of hybrid failure have been attributed to prezygotic pollen–stigma incompatibility [44], and various states of postzygotic intergenomic conflicts including cytoplasmic male sterility [45] and epistatic interactions between incompatible mutations (Bateson−Dobzhansky−Muller model) such as hybrid-necrosis systems [46]. Additional causes of failure include lethal single genes [47], differences in repetitive DNA sequences such as transposable elements, and satellite DNA that can cause segregation distortion [48], as well as disruption of genomic imprinting and the misregulation of gene expression [49]. In Vaccinium, this remains an entirely open area of investigation that could bring new breeding tools for introgression of more distantly related species.
Beyond Cyanococcus
Section Vaccinium
The first successful reports of wide hybridization beyond the sect. Cyanococcus were conducted in Finland by Rousi [50], who crossed V. corymbosum cultivars, ‘Rancocas’ and ‘Pemberton’, with wild Vaccinium uliginosum individuals from the sect. Vaccinium. Commonly known as bog bilberry, V. uliginosum is a circumboreal species, occurring naturally in diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid forms [32]. Its cold tolerance, attributed to its extreme northern distribution, has made it an attractive candidate for breeding to expand the cultivated range of highbush blueberry. The F1 hybrids from Rousi’s study were backcrossed to highbush blueberry, resulting in the cultivar ‘Aron’, which has demonstrated improved winter hardiness compared to American cultivars [51].
Since the 1960s, V. uliginosum has been used as a parent in nine documented hybridizations, all with members of the section Cyanococcus [40, 50, 52–55]. These reports are consistent, but sparse over the years (Fig. 1c).
Section Polycodium
Another important example of wide hybridization involves V. stamineum, commonly known as deerberry. Vaccinium stamineum (sect. Polycodium) is a diploid species with high trait polymorphism across its wide range of occurrence, from southeastern Ontario to central Florida, eastern Texas, eastern Oklahoma, and southern Kansas, with isolated populations in central Mexico. Noted for breeding by Darrow & Camp [22], it has been mentioned in 22 reports, 19 of which involve crosses with members of section Cyanococcus [10, 16, 22, 26, 56–58]. Interest in V. stamineum stems from its unique traits, including the accumulation of internal flesh pigmentation, large berry size compared to other wild species, high soluble solid content, firm texture, and adaptability to dry, sandy soils [7, 16, 59]. Following the creation of F1 hybrids, breeders backcrossed these hybrids to highbush blueberry to incorporate these traits into commercial lines.
Despite breeding efforts since 1945, it was not until 2025 when V. stamineum was incorporated into a cultivar released by the University of Florida. It is also noteworthy that V. stamineum has potential to be a standalone commercial crop [16, 58].
Section Batodendron
Vaccinium arboreum, commonly known as sparkleberry, from section Batodendron is a diploid species with a range extending from southern Virginia to central Florida, eastern Texas, central Oklahoma, and southeastern Missouri [32]. Since the 80s, V. arboreum has been extensively used for wide hybridization (Fig. 1c). Initially, in 1986, F1 hybrids of unknown fertility were reported between V. arboreum and diploid species from section Cyanococcus [10], but by 1991, fertile diploid F1 hybrids were successfully obtained [60]. Reports on these hybrids have continued over the years [14, 58, 61–64].
Breeders primarily value V. arboreum for its adaptation to challenging conditions, including dry and high-pH soils, as well as its deep taproot architecture, and floral structure that may aid in pollination [60]. Vaccinium arboreum represents a success story for wide hybridization, with its lineage contributing to a commercially available cultivar. The University of Florida Blueberry Breeding Program’s pedigree data show that hybrids between diploid V. darrowii and V. arboreum were backcrossed two generations with southern highbush blueberry, resulting in the cultivar ‘Meadowlark’ [65]. Additionally, F1 hybrids of ‘V. arboreum × highbush blueberry’ are currently tested as rootstocks to improve machine harvestability.
Section Hemimyrtillus
Species of sect. Hemimyrtillus including Vaccinium arctostaphylos, Vaccinium cylindraceum, Vaccinium padilfolium, and Vaccinium smallii, are native to Portuguese islands (Maderia and Azores), the Caucasus region, and Northeast Asia. These species have been of interest to blueberry breeders since the 1940s (Fig. 1c). Darrow and Camp [22] reported the first attempt at crossing V. arctostaphylos of sect. Hemimyrtillus with V. formosum of sect. Cyanococcus out of general curiosity. This cross was reported as successful, but no information on phenotype, fertility, and backcrossing was provided.
This section was not mentioned again until Ballington [26] reviewed a hybrid of diploid V. cylindraceum and V. darrowii. The progeny of this cross was described as amphidiploids and fertile. Vaccinium cylindraceum was especially valued for its upright growth habit, long pedicels, and loose inflorescence, which may aid in machine harvesting [26].
The most recent report of crossing species from this section with Cyanococcus species came from Ehlenfeldt and Ballington [57]. They outlined the crosses between V. darrowii and V. cylindraceum, V. corymbosum and V. cylindraceum, V. angustifolium and V. padifolium, V. cormybosum and V. padifolium, and a complex Cyanococcus hybrid and V. smallii. In all these crosses, progeny were obtained, but only the offspring of V. darrowii and V. cylindraceum were fertile [57].
Interestingly, Ehlenfeldt and Ballington [57] also reported a cross between V. stamineum (sect. Polycodium) and V. cylindraceum with no explanation, but likely with the purpose of serving as a bridge species, which are species used to overcome genetic incompatibility in wide hybridization.
Section Pyxothamnus
Section Pyxothamnus includes species native to the Americas as both diploid and tetraploid species. Interest in sect. Pyxothamnus began in the 1940s with Darrow & Camp [22] reporting hybrid seedlings between V. darrowii and Vaccinium ovatum. This interest continued sporadically over the years (Fig. 1c), with reports of crosses with Cyanococcus by Ballington [26], Ehlenfeldt and Ballington [66], and Ehlenfeldt and Luteyn [67].
Vaccinium meridionale is a tetraploid species native to high elevation regions of Peru, Colombia, and Venezuela. It has garnered considerable interest due to its reported ability to produce high-frequency triploids when crossed with diploid species of Cyanococcus (including V. boreale, V. corymbosum, V. elliottii, V. tenellum, and V. darrowii), which contrasts prior reports of a strong triploid block in Vaccinium [7, 66]. However, these triploids did not sustain significance for breeding purposes because of their low fertility. Because high-frequency triploid production in Vaccinium is so surprising, these crosses should be investigated further. A follow-up study reported the successful hybridization of V. meridionale × V. corymbosum, resulting in tetraploid offspring with both vigor and fertility [67].
Beyond its ability to produce triploid offspring, V. meridionale is of interest to blueberry breeders because of its monopodial plant structure and prolific concentrated flowering, both of which may aid in the development of machine-harvestable cultivars [67]. Perhaps the most promising use of V. meridionale is its potential to act as a bridge between taxonomic sections, expanding the potential usage of Vaccinium species from around the world [68]. The use of V. meridionale is recent, therefore, further exploration is needed to incorporate its traits into released cultivars.
Section Bracteata
Another recent development of wide hybrids has been those originating from the East Asian section Bracteata, including species Vaccinium bracteatum and Vaccinium boninense. The first report of Cyanococcus × Bracteata hybrids are from Tsuda et al. [69], which outline crossing experiments between colchicine-induced tetraploid V. bracteatum and V. corymbosum cv. ‘Spartan’. Similar to V. stamineum, V. bracteatum has internal pigmentation, a trait that was observed in the fruits of the F1 hybrids. In addition to its red pigmentation, V. bracteatum was targeted for its root system contributing to drought tolerance and adaptation to soils of higher pH.
The work with this section was furthered by Miyashita [70] and Miyashita et al. [18] with continued usage of V. bracteatum but an addition of V. boninense and Vaccinium wrightii. Vaccinium wrightii, also native to islands of East Asia, was reported as a member of sect. Bracteata, however, has been corrected to sect. Eococcus based on the phylogeny of Becker et al. [1]. Fertile F1 offspring of (V. darrowii × V. elliottii) × V. boninense was obtained and described as having light purple flesh, like previous reports. Vaccinium wrightii is reported to have successfully crossed with V. darrowii and a V. darrowii × V. elliottii hybrid but the fertility of the offspring is unknown.
The hybrids obtained with Asian sections of Vaccinium are promising as they are far removed from the domestication point of blueberry. This may offer a unique resource for breeders focused on the Asia/Pacific region as the regional blueberry industry has experienced significant growth in the last decade with an increase in 62 000 cultivated hectares since 2014 with China now being the top blueberry-producing country globally [71].
Other sections
Vaccinium oldhamii, belonging to sect. Ciliata, was another species identified as a potential parent by Miyashita [70]. Native to East Asia, V. oldhamii is a diploid species that also accumulates internal pigment. This trait was passed on to three F1 hybrids created with a V. darrowii × V. elliottii hybrid. However, these offspring were reported to be completely infertile.
Known as the European Bilberry, V. myrtillus of sect. Myrtillus holds cultural significance as a wild-harvested species throughout its range. It is particularly valued for its internal pigmentation, which results in a significantly higher anthocyanin content compared to blueberry cultivars [72]. Podwysynska et al. [73] were the first to report successful F1 hybrids of V. myrtillus × V. corymbosum. In their experiment, V. myrtillus underwent a colchicine treatment to induce tetraploidy before being crossed with the cultivars ‘Liberty’, ‘Bluecrop’, and ‘Northland’. While offspring were obtained for all cross combinations, fertility was not reported [73].
As the sole member of section Herpothamnus, Vaccinium crassifolium, known as creeping blueberry, is a diploid species endemic to four southeastern states in the USA [32]. A review by Lyrene and Ballington [10] listed a hybrid between V. tenellum of sect. Cyanococcus and V. crassifolium with partial fertility. The second, and last, report of a V. crassifolium hybrid with Cyanococcus comes from Redpath et al. [74], who simply reported the genome size of a V. fuscatum × V. crassifolium hybrid available in the National Clonal Germplasm Repository (NCGR). The minimal reports on V. crassifolium usage, coupled with the absence of published discussions about its breeding potential, limited its true value to improving cultivated germplasm.
Another sole member of its section is Vaccinium vitis-idaea, also known as lingonberry, of section Vitis-idaea. Vaccinium vitis-idaea is a diploid circumboreal species that is culturally significant in Scandinavia [32, 75]. A V. darrowii × V. vitis-idaea hybrid was the first Cyanococcus × Vitis-idaea cross reported by Ballington [26] as a personal communication from Nicholi Vorsa. Following this report, Ehlenfeldt et al. [41] reported two crosses: V. vitis-idaea × V. fuscatum and V. vitis-idaea × V. elliottii with only the former resulting in offspring that were strictly male fertile. Interestingly, though both V. vitis-idaea and V. fuscatum are diploid, the offspring were reported as triploid. Furthermore, the triploid offspring were able to cross-pollinate with 6x V. virgatum, indicating the production of unreduced gametes in the F1.
Beyond Oxycoccus
Section Vitis-idaea
As previously discussed, section Oxycoccus has only three species: V. macrocarpon, V. oxycoccos, and V. microcarpum. Consequently, intersectional hybridization has been suggested as a method to genetically improve cranberries and introgress novel traits, though its contributions are not yet commercially significant. The earliest reports of breeding with species of sect. Oxycoccus involved an intersectional hybrid between V. macrocarpon and V. vitis-idaea to introgress its unique aroma [35, 76]. Following the 1970s, this hybrid was no longer reported. Additionally, Schultz [37] reported success in obtaining progeny between these two species.
Section Macropelma
In the late 1990s, Zeldin and McCown [77] explored the use of Vaccinium reticulatum, a species native to Hawaii within section Macropelma to generate hybrids with V. macrocarpon and V. vitis-idaea (Fig. 1c). The main goal was to broaden the genetic basis of cranberry and lingonberry [77]. Traits of interest in V. reticulatum included its large red fruit, pest resistance, higher freeze tolerance, drought tolerance, and the ability to develop flowers on new growth, eliminating the need to protect buds during overwintering. While progeny was obtained, very little pollen was shed from the hybrids with V. macrocarpon. However, the crosses with V. vitis-idaea successfully set fruit, and F2 seedlings were obtained. No subsequent reports have documented further crossing involving members of sect. Macropelma.
Section Pyxothamnus
Species of sect. Pyxothamnus have been instrumental in expanding the cranberry gene pool as they have been considered a bridge for intersectional hybridization [68]. Vaccinium meridionale has been an especially promising resource as it crosses with distant related species of sect. Cyanococcus, Oxycoccus, and Vitis-idaea [43, 66, 67]. F1 hybrids of tetraploid V. meridionale × V. macrocarpon are described as intermediate with limited female fertility and good male fertility. The authors suggest that the offspring is allotetraploid and has potential to generate an upright cranberry-like cultivar and expand the range of production [41].
Section Cyanococcus
Finally, a single report of a Cyanococcus × Oxycoccus hybrid was reported by Vorsa et al. [78] at the diploid level. This cross occurred between V. darrowii × (V. macrocarpon × V. microcarpum). Despite this accomplishment, the offspring were infertile. Ehlenfeldt et al. [43] suggested that these crosses are more likely to result in fertile offspring when conducted at a tetraploid level so that the resulting allotetraploidy can aid in reinforcing fertility.
Considerations
Relying solely on historical crossing reports for understanding the germplasm base presents several challenges including taxonomic changes, species misidentifications, and missing crossing records. Changes in taxonomy pose a significant challenge when sorting through crossing records since names have frequently changed over time, especially within sect. Cyanococcus. To improve the robustness of future interspecific hybridization studies, breeders and researchers should consider creating and citing herbarium specimens of the parental species. Furthermore, our review can only include hybridizations that have been reported in the literature. Many hybrids may have gone unreported. Most reports highlight success stories, while failures often remain unpublished. This bias is reflected in our statistics, as 88% of all reports claim progeny was obtained from the cross, thus inflating the success rate of interspecific hybridization. Despite these challenges, the integration of genomic technology offers a way to infer the contribution of wild species into the current genetic background of cultivars.
Vaccinium diversity and germplasm resources
Defining the gene pool
The crop gene pools are typically split into three categories: primary, secondary, and tertiary gene pools. These gene pools help to define crossability among crop wild relatives. For blueberry, Lyrene and Ballington [10] define the primary gene pool as wild individuals of V. corymbosum or V. ashei for highbush and rabbiteye, respectively, the secondary genepool as the rest of Cyanococcus species, and the tertiary being the rest of Vaccinium. Similarly, for cranberry, the primary gene pool is V. macrocarpon, the secondary gene pool is other members of Oxycoccus such as V. oxycoccos and V. microcarpum, and the tertiary gene pool is the rest of Vaccinium [26].
While prior work has defined the extent of the gene pool for blueberry and cranberry to the genus Vaccinium [26], we argue that the known polyphyly of Vaccinium demands consideration of the entire tribe when describing the wild relatives of blueberry and cranberry. Becker et al. [1] greatly expanded the phylogenetic analyses of the tribe Vaccinieae by increasing species sampling (261 terminals) and loci analyzed (256 low-copy nuclear genes from the Angiosperm353 v1 target capture kit). Utilizing this most recent phylogenic tree topology from Becker et al. [1] and the historical records of hybridizations compiled in this study, we can redefine potential crop wild relatives for these crops (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.

Phylogeny of the Vaccinium genus highlighting species and sections used for hybridization experiments. Crosses between sections are indicated by colored brackets. Dashed lines indicate a polyphyletic section with ambiguous phylogenetic origin. Figure was adapted from Becker et al. [1].
Acknowledging the near-complete cross-compatibility between homoploids of sect. Cyanococcus, we can consider this monophyletic group as one entity for crossability. Cyanococcus has been demonstrated to successfully cross with species of 12 sections: Hemimyrtillus, Herpothamnus, Oxycoccus, Vaccinium, Pyxothamnus, Vitis-idaea, Myrtillus, Bracteata, Eococcus, Ciliata, Batodendron, and Polycodium. All sections are represented on the phylogenic tree (Fig. 2), except sect. Ciliata. The phylogenetic distance of many of these sections from Cyanococcus have striking implications for the possibilities of wide hybridizations. However, perhaps more interesting than the distance of these Vaccinium sections is the presence of the collapsed clade containing 23 other genera in between Vaccinium species. Cyanococcus has demonstrated its ability to cross to species on either side of this collapsed clade, indicating the potential to cross with species currently classified as other genera. These genera are mostly distributed in South and Central America, with just Dimorphanthera distributed throughout Southeast Asia. Furthermore, the documented interspecific hybrid of Vaccinium × Agapetes found in the USDA GRIN database is an example of an intergeneric hybrid that may be indicative of greater diversity available for breeding than previously thought [79].
Species richness and repositories
First defined by Linneaus in 1737, the genus Vaccinium is often reported as comprising ~500 species within the subfamily Vaccinoideae and tribe Vaccineae which contains ~34 genera and ~1430 species [1]. Vaccinium is a cosmopolitan genus with a near global distribution, but the greatest density of species are found in the tropics [21]. According to current biodiversity databases, the species richness of Vaccinium is highest in Southeast Asia, specifically Indonesia, followed by either Papua New Guinea or China depending on the database (Fig. S1).
While it is agreed that Vaccinium is a large genus with vast diversity, the true number of species and their distributions are difficult to pinpoint. The two standard biodiversity databases, Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio), are inconsistent for species reports, synonyms, and richness by country (Fig. S1). Database comparisons can be found in File S1. These biodiversity databases and herbarium records are a severely underutilized resource for plant breeders and can play a valuable role in determining germplasm collection goals. More efforts and funds should be dedicated to curate the information and expand accessions for underrepresented taxa and countries. In this sense, it is also important to acknowledge the role of the USDA National Clonal Germplasm Repository (Corvallis, OR, USA). In their Germplasm Resource Information Network (GRIN), there are 76 species across 1841 accessions within the genus Vaccinium available upon request.
Genomic resources
In the era of genomics-assisted breeding, generating DNA sequence information for wild species can also aid in speeding up prebreeding efforts. Although diverse and well adapted to their native environment, wild species often possess several undesirable traits and linkage drags can be difficult to overcome. The precise genomic identification of major domestication loci in cultivated species or regions controlling traits of interest to introgress from the wild species have been shown in other crops to accelerate the recovery of the elite background [80] and/or for the de novo domestication of wild species [81]. In blueberry, researchers have used genomics to uncover historical introgressions from wild species. For instance, Brevis et al. [82] and Nishiyama et al. [83] used molecular markers to uncover the admixture of various Vaccinium species in highbush and rabbiteye blueberry cultivars. Similarly, Wang et al. [84] conducted genomic analysis to identify genes associated with low-chilling requirements and fruit firmness introgressed from V. darrowii and V. ashei into southern highbush blueberries.
The first draft genomes of blueberry [85] and cranberry [86] were published in 2014. But a high-quality and chromosome-scale assembly of blueberry only became available in 2019 [87] and for cranberry [88] in 2021. Since then, advancements in sequencing technology and bioinformatic tools promoted a rise in the number of genome sequences available, with some tapping into wild species of undomesticated sections (Fig. 3, Table S1). Available genomes of wild species include, V. darrowii [89, 90], Vaccinium caesariense [91], V. microcarpum [88, 92], V. myrtillus [39], V. vitis-idaea [93], V. bracteatum [94], Vaccinium duclouxii [95], and Vaccinium floribundum [96]. A highbush blueberry and cranberry pangenome became recently available but species outside of sect. Cyanococcus and Oxycoccus are not included, therefore only a subset of Vaccinium diversity is represented [97]. While other crops already have super-pangenomes in place [98], the diversity of the Vaccinium genus is still tremendously underrepresented in terms of genomic resources.
Figure 3.

Cumulative increase in the number of publicly available genome assemblies for Vaccinium species over the years. Different taxonomic sections within Vaccinium are labeled by color.
Global need for prebreeding efforts
Although we have demonstrated the potential for crossability with other Vaccinium species and genera of the tribe Vaccinieae, crucial information about these wild species is still missing, which is imperative for effective prebreeding. While close relatives of blueberry and cranberry, such as those in sections Cyanococcus and Oxycoccus, are well documented, most sections remain poorly described. A simple record search on iDigBio (iDigBio) reveals that information on most tropical Vaccinium species is limited to <10 records (Fig. S1), posing a significant limitation for prebreeding collections.
Despite Vaccinium’s near-global distribution, most breeding work and reports of interspecific hybridization are occurring in the USA, where both blueberry and cranberry are native and have been domesticated. However, due to the global expansion of production areas, the use of new species may be crucial for the local adaptation and improvement of these crops [3]. China (in Asia) and Peru (in South America) have already surpassed the USA in terms of blueberry production [99]. The successful adaptation of southern highbush cultivars to the warm climate in Florida using the native V. darrowii [7] and to harsh Scandinavian winters using the native V. uliginosum [51] are examples of the possibilities when developing cultivars for new regions.
Within the USA, hybridization experiments have made notable efforts to harness global diversity for breeding, with reports including parent species from 14 sections, whereas other countries’ publications have never exceeded the use of species from five sections. Countries with the highest species richness, such as Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and China, have not published any work on interspecific hybridization involving their native species (Fig. S1). This disparity could be due to the English-query bias of this study, but also due to a lack of publications, resources, or interest in these other countries. The majority of cross reports were made by five US-based breeders: Dr Paul Lyrene, Dr Mark Ehlenfeldt, Dr James Ballington, Dr Nicholi Vorsa, and Dr James Polashock. An overview of authorship patterns can be found in File S1 and Fig. S2.
Perspectives
Overall, this review reinforces the need for a more globalized effort to characterize local native germplasm resources and report hybridization outcomes (both successes and failures) with Vaccinium species. Locally adapted cultivars have proven themselves imperative by the examples outlined in this review and should continue to be generated for each growing region. Furthermore, the near-global distribution of Vaccinium and the opportunities outlined by phylogenetic analyses highlight the unique case of blueberry and cranberry as relatively novel crops moving into the global sphere. With a unified, worldwide effort in Vaccinium prebreeding, the gaps in our understanding of species distributions, characteristics, and crossability can be bridged, paving the way for a more sustainable and resilient future for these increasingly valuable and health-promoting crops.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the University of Florida royalty fund procured through licensing of blueberry cultivars from the Blueberry Breeding and Genomics Lab. Special thanks to Dr P. Fritsch and Dr A. Becker for sharing their invaluable knowledge of Vaccinium taxonomy and nomenclature.
Contributor Information
Anisa M Khalid, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Juliana Benevenuto, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Paul M Lyrene, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Patricio R Munoz, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Author contributions
P.R.M. conceived the topic of the review. A.M.K. planned and conducted the literature search to compile the dataset. A.M.K. designed the paper outline, generated figures, and produced the first draft. J.B. provided feedback, expanded some sections, and helped with figure design. P.R.M. and J.B. supervised the project execution. P.R.M. and P.M.L. critically reviewed the second draft and made final improvements. All authors read and approved the final version.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.
References
- 1. Becker AL, Crowl AA, Luteyn JL. et al. A global blueberry phylogeny: evolution, diversification, and biogeography of Vaccinieae (Ericaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2024;201:108202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhidkin, R. R., & Matveeva, T. V. (2022). Phylogeny problems of the genus Vaccinium L. and ways to solve them. Ecol Genet. 2022;20:Article 2 [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lobos GA, Hancock JF. Breeding blueberries for a changing global environment: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Vorsa N, Zalapa J. Domestication, genetics, and genomics of the American cranberry. In: Goldman I, ed. Plant Breeding Reviews. 1st ed. Wiley, 2019,279–315 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sharpe RH. Horticultural Development of Florida Blueberries. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1953;188-190
- 6. Sharpe RH, Darrow GM. Breeding Blueberries for the Florida Climate. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1959;308-311
- 7. Sharpe RH, Sherman WB. Breeding blueberries for low-chilling requirement. HortScience. 1971;6:145–7 [Google Scholar]
- 8. Edger PP, Iorizzo M, Bassil N. et al. There and back again; historical perspective and future directions for Vaccinium breeding and research studies. Hortic Res. 2022;9:uhac083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kron KA, Powell EA, Luteyn JL. Phylogenetic relationships within the blueberry tribe (Vaccinieae, Ericaceae) based on sequence data from MATK and nuclear ribosomal ITS regions, with comments on the placement of Satyria. Am J Bot. 2002;89:327–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lyrene P, Ballington J. Wide hybridization in Vaccinium. Hortscience. 1986;21:52–7 [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ballington JR. The role of interspecific hybridization in blueberry improvement. Acta Hortic. 2009;810:49–60 [Google Scholar]
- 12. Song G-Q, Hancock JF. Vaccinium. In: Kole C, ed. Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources: Temperate Fruits. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011,197–221 [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chavez DJ, Lyrene PM. Interspecific crosses and backcrosses between diploid Vaccinium darrowii and tetraploid southern highbush blueberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2009;134:273–80 [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wenslaff TF, Lyrene PM. Chromosome homology in tetraploid southern highbush × Vaccinium elliottii hybrids. HortScience. 2003;38:263–5 [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chavez DJ, Lyrene PM. Production and identification of colchicine-derived tetraploid Vaccinium darrowii and its use in breeding. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2009;134:356–63 [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lyrene PM. Phenotype and fertility of intersectional hybrids between tetraploid highbush blueberry and colchicine-treated Vaccinium stamineum. Hortscience. 2016;51:15–22 [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chu Y, Lyrene PM. Artificial induction of polyploidy in blueberry breeding: a review. Hortscience. 2025;60:100–10 [Google Scholar]
- 18. Miyashita C, Inoue E, Yamada T. et al. Hybridization of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) in section Cyanococcus with two Vaccinium section Bracteata species native to subtropical Asia. Sci Hortic. 2018;241:225–30 [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hancock JF, Lyrene P, Finn CE. et al. Blueberries and cranberries. In: Hancock JF, ed. Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding: Germplasm to Genomics. Springer: Dordrecht, 2008,115–50 [Google Scholar]
- 20. Crowl AA, Fritsch PW, Tiley GP. et al. A first complete phylogenomic hypothesis for diploid blueberries (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus). Am J Bot. 2022;109:1596–606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Camp WH. On the structure of populations in the genus Vaccinium. Brittonia. 1942;4:189–204 [Google Scholar]
- 22. Darrow GM, Camp WH. Vaccinium hybrids and the development of new horticultural material. Bull Torrey Bot Club. 1945;72:1 [Google Scholar]
- 23. Coville FV. Improving the wild blueberry. In: USDA Yearbook of Agriculture. 1937,559–74
- 24. Mainland CM. Frederick V. Coville and the history of North American highbush blueberry culture. Int J Fruit Sci. 2012;12:4–13 [Google Scholar]
- 25. Wang J. How fruit moves: crop systems, culture, and the making of the commercial blueberry, 1870–1930. Plants People Planet. 2024;6:1080–93 [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ballington J. Collection, utilization, and preservation of genetic resources in Vaccinium. Hortscience. 2001;36:213–20 [Google Scholar]
- 27. Fritsch PW, Crowl AA, Manos PS. Vaccinium virgatum (Ericaceae): a species to be recognized. J Bot Res Institute Texas. 2024;18: [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lyrene P. The use of Vaccinium elliottii Chapmn. in breeding highbush blueberry. Rutgers University Press. 2014.
- 29. Megalos B, Ballington J. Unreduced pollen frequencies versus hybrid production in diploid-tetraploid Vaccinium crosses. Euphytica. 1988;39:271–8 [Google Scholar]
- 30. Dweikat, I. M., & Lyrene, P. M. (1991). Induced Tetraploidy in a Vaccinium elliottii Facilitates Crossing with Cultivated Highbush Blueberry. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 116(6), 1063‑1066 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cabezas, D., de Bem Oliveira, I., Acker, M., Lyrene, P., & Munoz, P. R. (2021). Evaluating Wild Germplasm Introgression into Autotetraploid Blueberry. Agronomy, 11(4), 614 [Google Scholar]
- 32. Vander Kloet SP. The Genus Vaccinium in North America. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada. 1988. https://books.google.com/books?id=pLCXzQEACAAJ [Google Scholar]
- 33.POWO (2025). "Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet; https://powo.science.kew.org/Retrieved 26 April 2025." [Google Scholar]
- 34. Smith TW, Walinga C, Wang S. et al. Evaluating the relationship between diploid and tetraploid Vaccinium oxycoccos (Ericaceae) in eastern Canada. Botany. 2015;93:623–36 [Google Scholar]
- 35. Christ E. Crossbreedings between cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon ait.) and cowberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.). Acta Hortic. 1977;61:285–94 [Google Scholar]
- 36. Vorsa N, Polashock JJ. Alteration of anthocyanin glycosylation in cranberry through interspecific hybridization. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2005;130:711–5 [Google Scholar]
- 37. Schultz JH. Some Cytotaxonomic and Germination Studies in the Genus Vaccinium. Washington State University; 1944: [Google Scholar]
- 38. Qi X, Ogden EL, Bostan H. et al. High-density linkage map construction and QTL identification in a diploid blueberry mapping population. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:692628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wu C, Deng C, Hilario E. et al. A chromosome-scale assembly of the bilberry genome identifies a complex locus controlling berry anthocyanin composition. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022;22:345–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Shigyou M, Gushiken A, Katsuragawa A. et al. Evaluation of F1 progenies derived from intersectional crossing of Vaccinium uliginosum L., a wild species native to Japan, and highbush blueberry ‘Bluecrop’ (V. corymbosum L.). Hortic Res. 2014;13:97–106 [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ehlenfeldt MK, Polashock JJ, Vorsa N. et al. Fertile intersectional F1 hybrids of 4x Andean blueberry (Vaccinium meridionale) and 4x American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon). Hortscience. 2023;58:234–9 [Google Scholar]
- 42. Alix K, Gérard PR, Schwarzacher T. et al. Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. Ann Bot. 2017;120:183–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ehlenfeldt MK, Ogden E, Rowland LJ. Asymmetric reciprocal crossing behavior of an Andean blueberry (V. meridionale) × lingonberry (V. vitis-idaea). Hybrid Plants. 2022;11:Article 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Huang J, Yang L, Yang L. et al. Stigma receptors control intraspecies and interspecies barriers in Brassicaceae. Nature. 2023;614:303–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chase CD. Cytoplasmic male sterility: a window to the world of plant mitochondrial-nuclear interactions. Trends Genet. 2007;23:81–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bomblies K, Weigel D. Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:382–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Ma J, Hancock WG, Nifong JM. et al. Identification and editing of a hybrid lethality gene expands the range of interspecific hybridization potential in Nicotiana. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133:2915–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Schmidt N, Sielemann K, Breitenbach S. et al. Repeat turnover meets stable chromosomes: repetitive DNA sequences mark speciation and gene pool boundaries in sugar beet and wild beets. Plant J. 2024;118:171–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Runemark A, Moore EC, Larson EL. Hybridization and gene expression: beyond differentially expressed genes. Mol Ecol. 2024;34:e17303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rousi A. Hybridization between Vaccinium uliginosum and cultivated blueberry. Ann Agric Fenn. 1963;2:12–8 [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hiirsalmi H, Lehmushovi A. A Finnish highbush blueberry variety ‘Aron.’. Ann Agric Fenn. 1982;21:151–4 [Google Scholar]
- 52. Czesnik E, Madry W. Inheritance of some characters of the F1 generation of interspecific hybrids Vaccinium corymbosum L. × Vaccinium uliginosum L. Acta Horticulturae. 1989;241:50–5 [Google Scholar]
- 53. Erst AA, Gorbunov AB, Asbaganov SV. et al. Applying biotechnology in the propagation and further selection of Vaccinium uliginosum × (V. corymbosum × V. angustifolium) hybrids. Plants (Basel). 2021;10:1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Gorbunov AB. Introduction and breeding of Vacciniaceae in Siberia. Acta Hortic. 1993;346:103–6 [Google Scholar]
- 55. Hiirsalmi H. Inheritance of characters in hybrids of Vaccinium uliginosum and highbush blueberries. Ann Agric Fenn. 1977;16:7–18 [Google Scholar]
- 56. Ballington J. Crossability between subgenus Cyanococcus (gray) Klotzsch and subgenus Polycodium (raf) Sleumer in Vaccinium. Hortscience. 1980;15:419–9 [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ehlenfeldt MK, Ballington JR. Vaccinium species of section Hemimyrtillus: their value to cultivated blueberry and approaches to utilization. Botany. 2012;90:347–53 [Google Scholar]
- 58. Lyrene PM. Breeding cultivars from blueberry × deerberry hybrids: progress and prospects. Hortscience. 2021;56:439–46 [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ballington JR, Ballinger WE, Mainland CM. et al. Ripening period of Vaccinium species in southeastern North Carolina. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1984;109:392–6 [Google Scholar]
- 60. Lyrene P. Fertile derivatives from sparkleberry × blueberry crosses. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1991;116:899–902 [Google Scholar]
- 61. Chavez DJ, Lyrene PM. Hybridization of two diploid Vaccinium section Cyanococcus species with diploid Vaccinium arboreum in section Batodendron. Euphytica. 2010;171:263–72 [Google Scholar]
- 62. Lyrene PM. First report of Vaccinium arboreum hybrids with cultivated highbush blueberry. Hortscience. 2011;46:563–6 [Google Scholar]
- 63. Lyrene PM, Olmstead JW. The use of inter-sectional hybrids in blueberry breeding. Int J Fruit Sci. 2012;12:269–75 [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wenslaff TF, Lyrene PM. Unilateral cross compatibility in Vaccinium elliottii × V. arboreum, an intersectional blueberry hybrid. Euphytica. 2003;131:255–8 [Google Scholar]
- 65. Olmstead JW, Armenta HPR, Lyrene PM. Using sparkleberry as a genetic source for machine harvest traits for southern highbush blueberry. HortTechnology. 2013;23:419–24 [Google Scholar]
- 66. Ehlenfeldt MK, Ballington JR. Prolific triploid production in intersectional crosses of 4× Vaccinium corymbodendron Dunal (section Pyxothamnus) by 2× section Cyanococcus species. Euphytica. 2017;213:238 [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ehlenfeldt MK, Luteyn JL. Fertile intersectional F1 hybrids of 4× Vaccinium meridionale (section Pyxothamnus) and highbush blueberry, V. Corymbosum (section Cyanococcus). Hortscience. 2021;56:318–23 [Google Scholar]
- 68. Ehlenfeldt MK, Polashock JJ, Ballington JR. Vaccinium corymbodendron Dunal as a bridge between taxonomic sections and ploidies in Vaccinium: a work in progress. North American Blueberry Research and Extension Workers Conference.2018;18
- 69. Tsuda, H., Kunitake, H., Yamasaki, M., Komatsu, H., & Yoshioka, K. (2013). Production of Intersectional Hybrids between Colchicine-induced Tetraploid Shashanbo (Vaccinium bracteatum) and Highbush Blueberry ‘Spartan’. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 138(4), 317‑324 [Google Scholar]
-
70.
Miyashita, C. (2017). Genetic classification in Vaccinium including blueberries and Japanese wild species, and application of their interspecific hybrids for breeding.
(12), 1‑51 [Google Scholar] - 71. Brazelton C, Fain C, Ogg M, Ilyas S. Global State of the Blueberry Industry. International Blueberry Organization, 2024. https://www.internationalblueberry.org/2024-report/ [Google Scholar]
- 72. Može Š, Polak T, Gašperlin L. et al. Phenolics in Slovenian bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:6998–7004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Podwyszynska M, Mynett K, Markiewicz M. et al. Chromosome doubling in genetically diverse bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) accessions and evaluation of tetraploids in terms of phenotype and ability to cross with highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum L.). Agronomy (Basel). 2021;11:2584 [Google Scholar]
- 74. Redpath, L. E., Aryal, R., Lynch, N., Spencer, J. A., Hulse-Kemp, A. M., Ballington, J. R., Green, J., Bassil, N., Hummer, K., Ranney, T., & Ashrafi, H. (2022). Nuclear DNA contents and ploidy levels of North American Vaccinium species and interspecific hybrids. Scientia Horticulturae, 297, 110955 [Google Scholar]
- 75. Ehlenfeldt M, Luteyn JL, de la Torre F. et al. Triploid hybrids of 2× lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) by 2× black highbush blueberry (V. fuscatum) and 2× Elliott’s blueberry (V. elliottii) as evidence of a genome balance requirement for hybridization success. Horticulturae. 2023;9:Article 12 [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ahokas H. Artificial, reciprocal hybrids between Vaccinium-microcarpum and Vaccinium-vitis-idaea. Ann Agric Fenn. 1979;16:3–6 [Google Scholar]
- 77. Zeldin EL, McCown BH. Intersectional hybrids of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea, section Vitis-idea) and (cranberry V. macrocarpon, section Oxycoccus) to Vaccinium reticulatum (section Macropelma). Acta Hortic. 1997;446:235–8 [Google Scholar]
- 78. Vorsa, N., Johnson-Cicalese, J., & Polashock, J. (2009). A blueberry by cranberry hybrid derived from a Vaccinium darrowii × (V. macrocarpon × V. oxycoccos) intersectional cross. Acta Horticulturae, 810, 187‑190 [Google Scholar]
- 79. USDA Agricultural Research Service, U. S. D. O. A . Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) [Dataset]. National Agricultural Library—ARS—USDA; 2015 [Google Scholar]
- 80. Tang D, Jia Y, Zhang J. et al. Genome evolution and diversity of wild and cultivated potatoes. Nature. 2022;606:535–41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Zsögön A, Čermák T, Naves ER. et al. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:1211–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Brevis PA, Bassil NV, Ballington JR. et al. Impact of wide hybridization on highbush blueberry breeding. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2008;133:427–37 [Google Scholar]
- 83. Nishiyama S, Fujikawa M, Yamane H. et al. Genomic insight into the developmental history of southern highbush blueberry populations. Heredity. 2021;126:194–205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Wang Z, Zhang W, Zhou Y. et al. Genetic and epigenetic signatures for improved breeding of cultivated blueberry. Hortic Res. 2024;11:uhae138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Bian Y, Ballington J, Raja A. et al. Patterns of simple sequence repeats in cultivated blueberries (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus spp.) and their use in revealing genetic diversity and population structure. Mol Breed. 2014;34:675–89 [Google Scholar]
- 86. Polashock J, Zelzion E, Fajardo D. et al. The American cranberry: first insights into the whole genome of a species adapted to bog habitat. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Colle M, Leisner CP, Wai CM. et al. Haplotype-phased genome and evolution of phytonutrient pathways of tetraploid blueberry. GigaScience. 2019;8:giz012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Diaz-Garcia L, Garcia-Ortega LF, González-Rodríguez M. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) and its wild relative Vaccinium microcarpum. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Cui F, Ye X, Li X. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the diploid blueberry Vaccinium darrowii provides insights into its subtropical adaptation and cuticle synthesis. Plant Commun. 2022;3:100307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Yu J, Hulse-Kemp AM, Babiker E. et al. High-quality reference genome and annotation aids understanding of berry development for evergreen blueberry (Vaccinium darrowii). Hortic Res. 2021;8:228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Mengist MF, Bostan H, De Paola D. et al. Autopolyploid inheritance and a heterozygous reciprocal translocation shape chromosome genetic behavior in tetraploid blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). New Phytol. 2023;237:1024–39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Kawash J, Colt K, Hartwick NT. et al. Contrasting a reference cranberry genome to a crop wild relative provides insights into adaptation, domestication, and breeding. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0264966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Hirabayashi K, Debnath SC, Owens GL. Unveiling the evolutionary history of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) through genome sequencing and assembly of European and North American subspecies. G3 (Bethesda). 2024;14:jkad294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Yang L, Li M, Shen M. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of the native Chinese wild blueberry Vaccinium bracteatum. Fruit Res. 2022;2:1–14 [Google Scholar]
- 95. Zeng T, He Z, He J. et al. The telomere-to-telomere gap-free reference genome of wild blueberry (Vaccinium duclouxii) provides its high soluble sugar and anthocyanin accumulation. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Albuja-Quintana M, Pozo G, Gordillo-Romero M. et al. Genome report: first reference genome of Vaccinium floribundum Kunth, an emblematic Andean species. G3 (Bethesd). 2024;14:jkae136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Yocca AE, Platts A, Alger E. et al. Blueberry and cranberry pangenomes as a resource for future genetic studies and breeding efforts. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Khan AW, Garg V, Roorkiwal M. et al. Super-pangenome by integrating the wild side of a species for accelerated crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25:148–58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Campos, M. (2024). Peru Remains Top Blueberry Exporter despite Drop in 2023. Produce Blue Book. https://www.bluebookservices.com/peru-remains-top-blueberry-exporter-despite-drop-in-2023/ Retrieved 10 February 2025 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

