Table 2.
Contrasting assessment paradigms: dichotomous vs. functional continuum.
| Assessment dimension | Traditional intent-focused model | Functional continuum model (FCM) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary classification | Intent to die (binary: present/absent) | Psychological function served (spectrum: affect regulation, punishment, communication) |
| Focus on lethality | Potential lethality of the method (e.g., pill dosage) | Acquired capability (habituation to pain/fear) and intensity of underlying psychache |
| Risk factors | Static (e.g., past attempts, demographics) | Dynamic (e.g., real-time emotion dysregulation, skill deficits, current interpersonal conflict) |
| Long-term goal | Behavioral cessation (stopping NSSI/SA) | Functional rehabilitation (building an adaptive skill toolbox) |
| Acute utility | High (determines immediate need for hospitalization) | Complementary (provides context to predict when functional triggers will escalate risk) |