Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 2;16:1724449. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1724449

Table 2.

Contrasting assessment paradigms: dichotomous vs. functional continuum.

Assessment dimension Traditional intent-focused model Functional continuum model (FCM)
Primary classification Intent to die (binary: present/absent) Psychological function served (spectrum: affect regulation, punishment, communication)
Focus on lethality Potential lethality of the method (e.g., pill dosage) Acquired capability (habituation to pain/fear) and intensity of underlying psychache
Risk factors Static (e.g., past attempts, demographics) Dynamic (e.g., real-time emotion dysregulation, skill deficits, current interpersonal conflict)
Long-term goal Behavioral cessation (stopping NSSI/SA) Functional rehabilitation (building an adaptive skill toolbox)
Acute utility High (determines immediate need for hospitalization) Complementary (provides context to predict when functional triggers will escalate risk)