Chart 2. Assessment of the quality of included studies according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.
| Question | Araújo, 2022(9) | Neris, 2020(18) | Bigun, 2015(19) | Shipp, 2015(20) | Dázio, 2009(21) | Kandemi,2017(22) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Were the research objectives clearly stated? | • | • | • | ⊕ | • | • |
| 2. Is the qualitative methodology appropriate? | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| 3. Was the research design adequate to achieve the proposed objectives? | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| 4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the research objectives? | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| 5. Was the data collected to address the research question? | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| 6. Was the relationship between the researcher and the participants adequately considered? | ⊕ | • | • | • | • | • |
| 7. Were ethical issues considered? | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| 8. Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | • | • | • | ⊕ | • | • |
| 9. Were the results reported clearly? | • | • | ⊕ | • | ⊕ | • |
| 10. Does the research make contributions? | • | • | • | • | • | • |
| - Classification - | A | A | A | A | A | A |
• - Yes; o - No; ⊕ - Paritally.