Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2025 Nov 25;17(11):9128–9138. doi: 10.62347/OWVG7205

Inflammatory cytokines, metabolites, and pre-eclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Yuting Liang 1,3, Yanqiu Zhang 6, Yi Zhang 2, Jun Cao 1, Longwei Qiao 5, Zhixing Jin 2,4
PMCID: PMC12709290  PMID: 41415077

Abstract

Objectives: Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of maternal and fetal mortality, with inflammatory dysregulation implicated in its pathogenesis. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study aimed to investigate the causal effects of 91 inflammatory cytokines on PE and to identify potential mediating metabolites. Methods: We conducted a two-sample MR analysis using genome-wide association study data from European-ancestry populations: including 91 inflammatory cytokines (14,824 participants), 1,400 plasma metabolites (8,299 participants), and PE (2,355 cases; 264,887 controls). Instrumental variables were selected at P < 1 × 10-5. Causal estimates were assessed using inverse-variance weighted regression, with additional sensitivity analyses to evaluate MR assumptions. Mediation analysis was subsequently performed to identify relevant metabolite pathways. Results: We identified two novel risk factors and two protective factors for PE: genetically proxied elevations in fibroblast growth factor 5 (FGF-5) and Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) increased PE risk, whereas interleukin-10 (IL-10) and interleukin-20 (IL-20) were protective. Importantly, this is the first MR study to identify N-acetyl-L-alanine (ALA) as a significant mediator of cytokine effects in PE. ALA mediated 5.56% of the effect of FGF-5, revealing a pathway whereby elevated FGF-5 reduces ALA levels and consequently increases PE risk. Conclusions: This study establishes FGF-5 and MMP-1 as novel causal risk factors for PE, while IL-10 and IL-20 exert protective effects. The identification of ALA as a partial mediator of FGF-5 uncovers a new metabolic-inflammatory pathway in the pathogenesis of PE. These findings highlight potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of PE.

Keywords: Inflammatory factors, pre-eclampsia (PE), Mendelian randomization (MR), causality, metabolites

Introduction

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including pre-eclampsia (PE), eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and chronic hypertension, are major contributors to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. Among these conditions, PE is the most clinically significant, complicating 5-7% of pregnancies and accounting for more than 70,000 maternal and 500,000 fetal deaths annually [2]. PE is characterized by hypertension and proteinuria and, in severe cases, may progress to multi-organ dysfunction. Although delivery generally alleviates symptoms, PE can persist into the postpartum period or arise de novo after childbirth, contributing to substantial peripartum morbidity [3]. Furthermore, HDP - particularly preterm PE - is associated with increased long-term risks of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease [4].

The pathophysiology of PE involves a complex interplay of placental dysfunction, endothelial impairment, and systemic inflammation [5]. Placental-derived factors contribute to oxidative stress, stimulate the release of anti-angiogenic mediators such as sFlt-1, and amplify inflammatory signaling, collectively driving endothelial injury [6]. Dysregulated immune responses further worsen placental malperfusion and promote fetal growth restriction [7]. Although observational studies have reported associations between specific inflammatory cytokines - such as macrophage inflammatory protein-1β (MIP-1β) [8] and interleukin-18 (IL-18) [9] - and HDP, confounding variables and reverse causality limit the ability of such studies to establish definitive causal relationships.

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for establishing causal inference, their implementation in pregnancy is often limited by ethical and practical constraints. Mendelian randomization (MR) has therefore emerged as a powerful alternative, leveraing genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer causality while minimizing confounding [10].

In this study, we applied a two-sample MR framework to systematically evaluate the causal effects of 91 inflammatory cytokines on PE risk. The selection of these cytokines was derived from a recent large-scale proteomic genome-wide association study (GWAS) [11], providing unprecedented breadth of coverage and enabling the discovery of novel causal factors in PE. Furthermore, we integrated metabolomic data to investigate potential mediating pathways, thereby offering new insights into the mechanistic links between inflammation and PE. Collectively, our findings aim to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the early detection and intervention of PE.

Materials and methods

Study design

The overall MR analysis framework is illustrated in Figure 1. We first obtained published GWAS summary statistics for 91 inflammatory cytokines, 1,400 plasma metabolites (including 1,091 metabolites and 309 metabolite ratios), and PE. We then performed two-sample MR analyses to evaluate the causal relationships between inflammatory cytokines, plasma metabolites, and PE. Finally, a two-step MR mediation analysis was conducted to quantify the proportion of the cytokine-PE causal effect mediated by plasma metabolites, thereby identifying potential biological pathways.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of the Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses conducted in this study. Published genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics were first obtained for 91 inflammatory cytokines, 1,400 plasma metabolites (including 1,091 metabolites and 309 metabolite ratios), and pre-eclampsia (PE). Two-sample MR analyses were then performed to evaluate the causal relationships between inflammatory cytokines, plasma metabolites, and PE. Finally, mediation analyses were concucted to quantify the proportion of the cytokine-to-PE causal effect mediated by plasma metabolites, thereby identifying potential biological pathways.

Data sources

Details of all GWAS summary statistics used in this study are summarized in Table 1. The GWAS dataset for 91 circulating inflammatory cytokines was obtained from a comprehensive meta-analysis published by Zhao JH in 2023 [11], comprising 11 cohorts and a total of 14,824 participants of European ancestry (accession numbers GCST90274758 - GCST90274848). Summary statistics for 1091 plasma metabolites and 309 plasma metabolite ratios were retrieved from the GWAS catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas) under accession numbers GCST90199621 - GCST90201020, encompassing 8299 European participants [12]. The PE dataset was derived from ebi-a-GCST90018906, also based on a European population, inclusing 2,355 PE cases, 264,887 controls, and 24,165,538 SNPs. As this study relies solely on published GWAS summary statistics, no additional ethical approval or patient consent was required.

Table 1.

Summary of genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets used in this study

Traits Sample size Ancestry Accession codes
91 inflammatory cytokines 14,824 participants European GCST90274758 - GCST90274848
1091 plasma metabolites and 309 plasma metabolite ratios 8,299 participants European GCST90199621 - GCST90201020
Pre-eclampsia 267,242 participants (2,355 cases; 264,887 controls) European ebi-a-GCST90018906

Selection of instrumental variables (IVs)

MR analyses rely on three key assumptions: (1) the relevance assumption, which requires that the genetic instrumental variables (IVs) are strongly associated with the exposure; (2) the independence assumption, which states that the IVs are not associated with any potential confounders; and (3) the exclusion restriction assumptions, which requires that the IVs influence the outcome exclusively through the specified exposure. Firstly, SNPs strongly associated with each exposure were selected as IVs using a threshold of P < 1 × 10-5. This threshold was chosen to ensure an adequate number of instruments while maintaining a strong genetic relevance to the exposure. To satisfy the independence assumption, linkage disequilibrium clumping was performed using threshold of kb > 10000 and r2 < 0.001. In addition, the F statistic for each IV was calculated, and only strong instruments (F > 10) were retained for subsequent MR analysis.

Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis

Using two-sample MR analyses, we evaluated the causal effects of 91 inflammatory cytokines and 1,400 plasma metabolites on PE. Potential PE-associated inflammatory cytokines and plasma metabolites were initially screened using a significance threshold of P < 0.05.

Reverse Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis

To examine whether PE exerts a causal effect on the inflammatory cytokines identified in the initial analysis (P < 0.05), we conducted a reverse MR analysis. In this framework, PE-associated SNPs were treated as instrumental variables (IVs), PE served as the exposure, and the previously identified inflammatory cytokines were considered the outcomes. For the primary reverse MR analysis, we applied the same significance threshold for IV selection as in the forward MR (P < 1 × 10-5). In addition, a supplementary analysis was performed using a more lenient threshold (P < 1 × 10-4) to identify potential causal signals that might be overlooked under the stricter criterion.

Mediation analysis

Mediation analysis is used to evaluate whether the effect of an exposure on an outcome operates through an intermediate variable (mediator), thereby providing insights into the potential mechanisms by which the exposure influences the outcome [13]. In the two-sample MR framework, inflammatory cytokines and serum metabolites that showed significant associations with PE were included in the mediation analysis. We first assessed whether these metabolites were causally associated with the cytokines. When such an association was identified, mediation MR analysis was conducted to determine whether the cytokines exerted their effects on PE and through specific serum metabolites and to quantify the extent of mediation.

Sensitivity analysis

To ensure the robustness of the MR results, several sensitivity analyses were conducted, including the MR-Egger intercept test, the MRPRESSO global test, the Cochran Q-test, and the leave-one-out analyses [14]. Potential horizontal pleiotropy was evaluated using both the MR-Egger regression intercept and the MRPRESSO global test [15,16], with P > 0.05 indicating no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy. Leave-one-out analyses were performed to assess whether any single SNP disproportionately influenced the causal estimates. In addition, heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q statistic, with P > 0.05 indicating no heterogeneity. When heterogeneity was detected (P < 0.05), SNPs with highly significant associations were considered for exclusion, or a random-effects model was applied to obtain more reliable mr estimates [17]. The symmetry of the funnel plots was also examinedas an additional assessment of heterogeneity. Finally, prior to all MR analyses, exposure and outcome datasets were harmonized, including allele alignment and appropriate handling of palindromic SNPs.

Statistical methods

All MR analyses were performed using the “TwoSampleMR” package (version 0.5.6) in R (version 4.3.1). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method with random effects was used as the primary analytical approach, accompanied by four supplementary methods - weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode - to assess the robustness of the causal estimates [18]. Because the accuracy of the IVW method depends on the assumption of no horizontal pleiotropy, MR-Egger regression was applied throughout the MR workflow to evaluate the intercept and test for directional pleiotropy. In addition, the MR-PRESSO global test was conducted using the “MRPRESSO” package (version 1.0) to detect and, if necessary, correct for horizontal pleiotropy [16]. Heterogeneity among the instrumental variables was assessed using Cochran’s Q test under both the IVW and MR-Egger frameworks. Sensitivity analyses were further conducted using the leave-one-out method to determine whether the causal relationship between the exposure and outcome was driven by any single SNP. Mediation analysis was implemented using a two-step MR approach. The mediation effect was calculated using the product-of-coefficients method, specifically, the product of β1 (the causal effect of the inflammatory cytokine on the plasma metabolite) and β2 (the causal effect of the plasma metabolite on PE). The proportion of the mediated effect was estimated as (β1 × β2)/β_total, where β_total represents the total causal effect of the inflammatory cytokine on PE.

Results

Causal effects of inflammatory cytokines on pre-eclampsia

We evaluated the causal effects of 91 inflammatory cytokines on PE risk using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) regression as the primary analytical method. Four cytokines showed significant associations with PE (Figure 2A). Specifically, genetically predicted elevated levels of fibroblast growth factor 5 (FGF-5) and Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) were associated with increased risk of PE, while elevated levels of interleukin 10 (IL-10) and interleukin 20 (IL-20) were associated with decreased risk. Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger regression and heterogeneity tests, supported the robustness of these findings, with no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (all P > 0.05, Table 2). Although heterogeneity was detected for FGF-5, this concern was mitigated by applying a random-effects IVW model. Leave-one-out analysis further confirmed that no single SNP disproportionately influenced the results.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Causal associations between inflammatory cytokines and pre-eclampsia (PE). (A). Forest plot of forward MR analyses assessing the causal effects of inflammatory cytokines on PE. (B). Forest plot of reverse MR analyses evaluating the potential causal effects of PE on inflammatory cytokines.

Table 2.

The heterogeneity and pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis

Exposure Outcome Heterogeneity test Pleiotropy test


IVW MR Egger MR Egger regression MR PRESSO




Cochran Q pval Cochran Q pval Intercept se pval RSSobs pval
IL-10 Pre-eclampsia 31.834 0.574 31.661 0.534 0.007 0.016 0.680 33.671 0.600
IL-20 Pre-eclampsia 14.507 0.883 13.853 0.876 -0.022 0.027 0.428 15.731 0.886
Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP1) Pre-eclampsia 12.490 0.988 12.416 0.983 -0.004 0.016 0.788 13.421 0.989
Fibroblast growth factor 5 (FGF-5) Pre-eclampsia 47.452 0.049 47.445 0.039 -0.001 0.015 0.949 53.232 0.090
FGF-5 N-acetyl-L-alanine (ALA) 34.287 0.313 34.262 0.270 -0.001 0.007 0.883 35.734 0.378
ALA Pre-eclampsia 22.193 0.902 21.753 0.891 -0.013 0.019 0.512 23.613 0.925

Reverse causality analysis

To assess potential reverse causation, we performed reverse MR analyses for the four cytokines identified in the primary analysis. Using the strict IV seletion threshold (P < 1 × 10-5), no significant causal effects of PE on FGF-5, IL-10, or IL-20 were detected, although a marginal association was observed for MMP-1. When a more lenient threshold (P < 1 × 10-4) was applied, no reverse causal effects were found for any of the cytokines (Figure 2B), thereby supporting the directionality and robustness of our primary MR findings.

Identification of mediating metabolites

We next sought to identify plasma metabolites that might mediate the effects of the four cytokines on PE. Initial screening identified 70 metabolites associated with PE risk (P < 0.05, IVW method), including 40 risk metabolites and 30 protective metabolites (see Supplementary Table 1 for full list).

We then examined the causal effects of the four cytokines on these 70 metabolites. Notably, a significant negative causal relationship was observed between FGF-5 and N-acetyl-L-alanine (ALA) levels (P < 0.05). In addition, lower ALA levels were associated with increased PE risk (P < 0.05, Figure 3). Together, these findings indicate that FGF-5 may increase PE risk partly by reducing circulating ALA levels (Figure 4). The proportion of the total effect of FGF-5 on PE mediated by ALA was 5.56% (mediation effect = 0.0109, 95% CI: 0.00146-0.0204, P = 0.024, Table 3). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the absence of pleiotropy or heterogeneity in these relationships (all P > 0.05, Table 2). No significant mediating metabolites were identified for MMP-1, IL-10, or IL-20.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MR results of inflammatory cytokines, metabolic mediators, and PE. Scatter plots showing MR estimates for (A) Fibroblast growth factor 5 (FGF-5) on N-acetyl-L-alanine (ALA) levels, (B) ALA on PE, and (C) FGF-5 on PE. Forest plots showing MR estimates for (D) FGF-5 on ALA, (E) ALA on PE, and (F) FGF-5 on PE. Funnel plots assessing potential heterogeneity for (G) FGF-5 on ALA, (H) ALA on PE, and (I) FGF-5 on PE. Leave-one-out analyses evaluating the influence of individual SNPs for (J) FGF-5 on ALA, (K) ALA on PE, and (L) FGF-5 on PE.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Forest plot illustrating the causal relationships among FGF-5, ALA, and PE. FGF-5 increases the risk of PE by recucing circulating ALA levels.

Table 3.

The mediation effect of N-acetyl-L-alanine (ALA) levels on the causal effect of FGF-5 in PE

Inflammatory cytokines Metabolites Outcome Beta all Mediated effect Mediated proportion pval
FGF-5 ALA Pre-eclampsia 0.1966 0.0109 (0.00146, 0.0204) 5.56% 0.024

Discussion

Our two-sample Mendelian randomization study provides novel genetic evidence supporting causal roles for specific inflammatory cytokines in PE and identifies, for the first time, a plasma metabolite that mediates one of these pathways. The key findings are as follows: (1) genetically proxied elevations in FGF-5 and MMP-1 increase the risk of PE, whereas IL-10 and IL-20 are protective effects; (2) reverse MR analyses largely ruled out reverse causation; and (3) ALA mediates approximately 5.56% of the causal effect of FGF-5 on PE risk, revealing a previously unrecognized metabolic-inflammatory pathway involved in PE pathogenesis.

FGF-5 has been implicated in hypertension and cancer progression, and recent studies have also suggested its involvement in PE susceptibility across diverse populations [19-21]. Our study expands on this evidence by demonstrating that its pathogenic effect is partially mediated through ALA. This metabolite may compete with L-alanine for nutrient receptors, potentially disrupting cellular metabolic pathways. Previous reports have associated elevated ALA with immunosuppressive states, such as reduced IFN-γ production in latent tuberculosis [22], and a recent MR study identified ALA as a mediator between T-cell markers and Guillain-Barré syndrome [23]. Take together, our findings suggest that FGF-5 - associated increases in ALA may reflect a state of metabolic dysregulation within placental or endothelial compartments during PE, contributing to impaired trophoblast function and vascular pathology.

MMP-1 plays a key role in extracellular matrix remodeling and vascular dysfunction. Elevated MMP-1 levels in PE may promote vascular collagen degradation, increase vascular sensitivity to vasoconstrictors such as angiotensin II, and facilitate neutrophil recruitment [24,25]. The absence of an identified metabolite mediator for MMP-1 in our analysis suggests that its effects may act through direct tissue remodeling or through additional molecular pathways not captured by the available metabolomic data.

The protective roles of IL-10 and IL-20 underscore the complex immunoregulatory balance required for a successful pregnancy [26]. IL-10 supports placentation and suppress excessive inflammation [27], whereas IL-20, despite its reported anti-angiogenic properties [28], may contribute to modulating immune tolerance or preventing aberrant angiogenesis in the maternal-fetal interface. Our MR analysis provides robust genetic evidence supporting the protective functions of both cytokines in PE.

The identification of FGF-5, MMP-1, IL-10, and IL-20 as causal contributors to PE, together with the mediating role of ALA, opens new avenues for PE risk stratification and intervention. These molecules represent promising biomarkers for early detection. Therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting the FGF-5 - ALA axis, or modulating IL-10/IL-20 signaling, may offer novel approaches for the prevention or management of PE, particularly amng individuals with high-risk pregnancies.

However, this study has several limitations. First, all datasets were derived from individuals of European ancestry, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations. Second, the metabolomic dataset provides only partial coverage of the human metabolome, and additional mediators may therefore remain undetected. Finally, MR cannot capture pregnancy-specific dynamic changes or delineate the precise tissue contexts in which these causal pathways operate.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this MR study provides robust genetic evidence for causal effects of specific inflammatory cytokines (FGF-5, MMP-1, IL-10, and IL-20) on pre-eclampsia risk and identifies N-acetyl-L-alanine (ALA) as a partial mediator of the FGF-5 pathway. These findings advance our understanding of the inflammatory mechanisms underlying PE pathogenesis and highlight promising avenues for developing novel biomarkers for early detection, as well as potential therapeutic strategies targeting these cytokine pathways or their downstream metabolic effects. Future research should aim to validate these findings in diverse populations, elucidate the precise biological mechanisms involved, and translate these insights into clinical applications to help reduce the burden of pre-eclampsia.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province Grant BK20240371, Suzhou Health Talent Program (GSWS2024046, GSWS2021004), Suzhou Key Clinical Technology Research (SKY2023001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82001576, No. 82001523), the Primary Research & Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (BE2022736), Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University - Qilu Medical Research Fund (24QL200205), and the Jiangsu Province College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project (202410285273Y). Informed consent from all participants.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

Abbreviations

HDP

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

PE

Pre-eclampsia

MIP-1β

Macrophage inflammatory protein-1β

IL-18

Interleukin-18

RCTs

Randomized controlled trials

MR

Mendelian randomization

SNPs

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms

GWAS

Genome-wide association study

IVs

Instrumental variables

IVW

Inverse variance weighted method

FGF-5

Fibroblast growth factor 5

MMP-1

Matrix metalloproteinase-1

ALA

N-acetyl-L-alanine

Supporting Information

ajtr0017-9128-f5.pdf (162.5KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Wu P, Green M, Myers JE. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. BMJ. 2023;381:e71653. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Phipps EA, Thadhani R, Benzing T, Karumanchi SA. Pre-eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15:275–289. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0119-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dimitriadis E, Rolnik DL, Zhou W, Estrada-Gutierrez G, Koga K, Francisco RPV, Whitehead C, Hyett J, Da Silva Costa F, Nicolaides K, Menkhorst E. Pre-eclampsia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023;9:8. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00417-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ramlakhan KP, Johnson MR, Roos-Hesselink JW. Pregnancy and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:718–731. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0390-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roberts JM. Preeclampsia epidemiology(ies) and pathophysiology(ies) Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;94:102480. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Torres-Torres J, Espino-Y-Sosa S, Martinez-Portilla R, Borboa-Olivares H, Estrada-Gutierrez G, Acevedo-Gallegos S, Ruiz-Ramirez E, Velasco-Espin M, Cerda-Flores P, Ramirez-Gonzalez A, Rojas-Zepeda L. A narrative review on the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:7569. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Deer E, Herrock O, Campbell N, Cornelius D, Fitzgerald S, Amaral LM, Lamarca B. The role of immune cells and mediators in preeclampsia. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023;19:257–270. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00670-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hart PMB, Stephenson NL, Scime NV, Tough SC, Slater DM, Chaput KH. Second trimester cytokine profiles associated with gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. PLoS One. 2022;17:e279072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huang X, Huang H, Dong M, Yao Q, Wang H. Serum and placental interleukin-18 are elevated in preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2005;65:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Birney E. Mendelian randomization. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2022;12:a041302. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhao JH, Stacey D, Eriksson N, Macdonald-Dunlop E, Hedman ÅK, Kalnapenkis A, Enroth S, Cozzetto D, Digby-Bell J, Marten J, Folkersen L, Herder C, Jonsson L, Bergen SE, Gieger C, Needham EJ, Surendran P, Paul DS, Polasek O, Thorand B, Grallert H, Roden M, Võsa U, Esko T, Hayward C, Johansson Å, Gyllensten U, Powell N, Hansson O, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Joshi PK, Danesh J, Padyukov L, Klareskog L, Landén M, Wilson JF, Siegbahn A, Wallentin L, Mälarstig A, Butterworth AS, Peters JE. Genetics of circulating inflammatory proteins identifies drivers of immune-mediated disease risk and therapeutic targets. Nat Immunol. 2023;24:1540–1551. doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01588-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen Y, Lu T, Pettersson-Kymmer U, Stewart ID, Butler-Laporte G, Nakanishi T, Cerani A, Liang KYH, Yoshiji S, Willett JDS, Su C, Raina P, Greenwood CMT, Farjoun Y, Forgetta V, Langenberg C, Zhou S, Ohlsson C, Richards JB. Genomic atlas of the plasma metabolome prioritizes metabolites implicated in human diseases. Nat Genet. 2023;55:44–53. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01270-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carter AR, Sanderson E, Hammerton G, Richmond RC, Davey Smith G, Heron J, Taylor AE, Davies NM, Howe LD. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36:465–478. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burgess S, Bowden J, Fall T, Ingelsson E, Thompson SG. Sensitivity analyses for robust causal inference from mendelian randomization analyses with multiple genetic variants. Epidemiology. 2017;28:30–42. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:512–525. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Verbanck M, Chen C, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50:693–698. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang Z, Wang S, Ren F, Yang L, Xie H, Pan L, Li Y, Yu B, Yang Y, Su H, Chen Y, Zhang C, Chen H, Yang W, An N, Bai Y. Inflammatory factors and risk of meningiomas: a bidirectional mendelian-randomization study. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1186312. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1186312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade KH, Haberland V, Baird D, Laurin C, Burgess S, Bowden J, Langdon R, Tan VY, Yarmolinsky J, Shihab HA, Timpson NJ, Evans DM, Relton C, Martin RM, Davey Smith G, Gaunt TR, Haycock PC. The mr-base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. 2018;7:e34408. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Steinthorsdottir V, McGinnis R, Williams NO, Stefansdottir L, Thorleifsson G, Shooter S, Fadista J, Sigurdsson JK, Auro KM, Berezina G, Borges MC, Bumpstead S, Bybjerg-Grauholm J, Colgiu I, Dolby VA, Dudbridge F, Engel SM, Franklin CS, Frigge ML, Frisbaek Y, Geirsson RT, Geller F, Gretarsdottir S, Gudbjartsson DF, Harmon Q, Hougaard DM, Hegay T, Helgadottir A, Hjartardottir S, Jääskeläinen T, Johannsdottir H, Jonsdottir I, Juliusdottir T, Kalsheker N, Kasimov A, Kemp JP, Kivinen K, Klungsøyr K, Lee WK, Melbye M, Miedzybrodska Z, Moffett A, Najmutdinova D, Nishanova F, Olafsdottir T, Perola M, Pipkin FB, Poston L, Prescott G, Saevarsdottir S, Salimbayeva D, Scaife PJ, Skotte L, Staines-Urias E, Stefansson OA, Sørensen KM, Thomsen LCV, Tragante V, Trogstad L, Simpson NAB FINNPEC Consortium; GOPEC Consortium. Aripova T, Casas JP, Dominiczak AF, Walker JJ, Thorsteinsdottir U, Iversen AC, Feenstra B, Lawlor DA, Boyd HA, Magnus P, Laivuori H, Zakhidova N, Svyatova G, Stefansson K, Morgan L. Genetic predisposition to hypertension is associated with preeclampsia in European and Central Asian women. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5976. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19733-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xin Q, Han Y, Jiang W, Wang J, Luan Y, Ji Q, Sun W. Genetic susceptibility analysis of fgf5 polymorphism to preeclampsia in chinese han population. Mol Genet Genomics. 2022;297:791–800. doi: 10.1007/s00438-022-01889-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ardissino M, Truong B, Slob EAW, Schuermans A, Yoshiji S, Morley AP, Burgess S, Ng FS, de Marvao A, Natarajan P, Nicolaides K, Gaziano L, Butterworth A, Honigberg MC. Proteome- and transcriptome-wide genetic analysis identifies biological pathways and candidate drug targets for preeclampsia. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2024;17:e004755. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.124.004755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang B, Mukherjee T, Radhakrishnan R, Paidipally P, Ansari D, John S, Vankayalapati R, Tripathi D, Yi G. Hiv-differentiated metabolite n-acetyl-l-alanine dysregulates human natural killer cell responses to mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:7267. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lyu Q, Zhang L, Ding Y, Liu Z. Genetically predicted n-acetyl-l-alanine mediates the association between cd3 on activated and secreting tregs and guillain-barre syndrome. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1398653. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1398653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Espino Y Sosa S, Flores-Pliego A, Espejel-Nuñez A, Medina-Bastidas D, Vadillo-Ortega F, Zaga-Clavellina V, Estrada-Gutierrez G. New insights into the role of matrix metalloproteinases in preeclampsia. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1448. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nugent WH, Mishra N, Strauss JF 3rd, Walsh SW. Matrix metalloproteinase 1 causes vasoconstriction and enhances vessel reactivity to angiotensin ii via protease-activated receptor 1. Reprod Sci. 2016;23:542–548. doi: 10.1177/1933719115607998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Spence T, Allsopp PJ, Yeates AJ, Mulhern MS, Strain JJ, Mcsorley EM. Maternal serum cytokine concentrations in healthy pregnancy and preeclampsia. J Pregnancy. 2021;2021:6649608. doi: 10.1155/2021/6649608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cubro H, Kashyap S, Nath MC, Ackerman AW, Garovic VD. The role of interleukin-10 in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20:36. doi: 10.1007/s11906-018-0833-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Autieri MV. Il-19 and other Il-20 family member cytokines in vascular inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. 2018;9:700. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ajtr0017-9128-f5.pdf (162.5KB, pdf)

Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES