Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2025 Nov 25;17(11):9239–9241. doi: 10.62347/JJNN3562

Clinical efficacy of precision liver resection for primary liver cancer

Yunhao Zhang 1, Tao Hu 1, Zhao Wang 1, Jianlei Yuan 1
PMCID: PMC12709309  PMID: 41415090

We have found that our article contained some mistakes in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, and in Figures 1, 2. The correct tables and figures are shown below. We are publishing this Erratum to reflect those changes. The authors express regret for the errors.

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic data and clinical characteristics of the two groups

Indicator Observational group (n = 46) Control group (n = 50) χ2/t P
Age (years) 54.65±7.08 55.14±8.01 0.315 0.753
Body mass index 20.64±1.10 20.62±1.90 0.060 0.952
Sex 0.071 0.790
    Male 27 28
    Female 19 22
Cirrhosis 2.022 0.155
    Yes 26 21
    No 20 29
Tumor diameter (cm) 7.49±1.18 7.91±1.28 1.671 0.098
Child-Pugh grading (n) 0.534 0.465
    Grade A 37 43
    Grade B 9 7
TNM stage (n) 1.428 0.232
    Stage I 33 41
    Stage II 13 9
CNLC staging (n) 0.251 0.617
    Stage I 30 35
    Stage II 16 15
Pathological type (n) 0.209 0.648
    Hepatocellular carcinoma 38 43
    Bile duct cell carcinoma 8 7
Hypertension 5 10 1.515 0.218
Stroke 7 8 0.011 0.916
Coronary heart disease 6 7 0.019 0.891
Distance between the lesion margins 5.83±0.47 5.80±0.47 0.313 0.755

Table 2.

Comparison of surgical indicators between the two groups

Indicator Observational group (n = 46) Control group (n = 50) χ2/t P
Operating time (min) 90.17±5.11 98.16±4.90 7.821 <0.001
Intraoperative bleeding (mL) 219.61±5.89 248.50±6.85 22.061 <0.001
Anal venting time (h) 70.24±4.55 80.76±3.84 12.268 <0.001
Length of hospital stay (days) 9.14±0.70 11.01±0.56 14.490 <0.001

Table 3.

Comparison of liver function and AFP between the two groups

Indicator Time Observational group (n = 46) Control group (n = 50) χ2/t P
AST (U/L) Before surgery 58.67±4.14 58.05±3.94 0.759 0.450
1 week after surgery 33.37±3.35 41.15±3.78 10.627 <0.001
TBIL (U/L) Before surgery 31.48±3.11 31.32±3.50 0.232 0.817
1 week after surgery 13.83±2.85 17.21±2.96 5.671 <0.001
ALT (U/L) Before surgery 43.43±6.85 44.93±2.74 1.431 0.156
1 week after surgery 26.78±3.02 32.77±3.44 9.020 <0.001
γ-GT (U/L) Before surgery 68.18±3.46 68.67±3.40 0.687 0.494
1 week after surgery 30.28±3.15 38.69±4.00 11.368 <0.001
AFP Before surgery 213.19±10.13 211.75±5.78 0.863 0.390
1 week after surgery 87.23±9.32 90.02±4.70 1.877 0.064

Note: AST: Aspartate transaminase; TBIL: Total Bilirubin; ALT: Alanine transaminase; γ-GT: γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein.

Table 4.

Comparison of the incidence of complications between the two groups

Indicator Observational group (n = 46) Control group (n = 50) χ2/t P
Pleural effusion 2 3
Biliary Leakage 1 2
Abdominal Infection 1 2
Pulmonary infection 0 1
Total incidence (%) 4 8 1.169 0.280

Table 5.

Three-year recurrence and survival rates in the two groups

Indicator Observational group (n = 46) Control group (n = 50) χ2/t P
Number of relapses 4 5 - -
Recurrence rate (%) 8.7% 10% 0.058 0.809
Survival population 39 40 - -

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kaplan Meier survival curve.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of inflammation indicators between the two groups. A: hs-CRP; B: PCT; C: IgG. Note: PCT: procalcitonin; IgG: Immunoglobin G; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. *P<0.05 as compared with control group.


Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES