Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of acupuncture and moxibustion on pain relief, inflammatory biomarkers, and reproductive outcomes in patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (CPID). Method: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang for studies published between January 2010 and December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with sham/conventional control interventions in CPID patients were included. The primary outcomes included pain intensity (visual analog scale, VAS), inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α]), and CPID specific indicators (fallopian tube patency and pelvic mass regression). Data were analyzed using a random-effects model (RevMan 5.3/Stata 16). Result: Thirteen RCTs involving 658 patients were included. Acupuncture significantly reduced pain intensity (standardized mean deviation [SMD]=-1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.66 to -1.18), CRP (SMD=-3.89), IL-6 (SMD=-5.00), TNF-α (SMD=0.60) (all P<0.001). CPID-specific outcomes were improved, with higher rates of fallopian tube patency (hazard ratio [RR] =1.35) and pelvic mass regression (RR=1.44; both P<0.01). Moreover, acupuncture improved quality of life (SMD=0.55, P<0.0001), increased pregnancy rate (RR=1.32), and reduced recurrence rates (RR=0.68; both P<0.05). Electroacupuncture combined with herbal medicine (≥8 weeks) showed the most pronounced therapeutic benefits. Conclusion: Electroacupuncture combined with herbal medicine significantly alleviates pelvic pain, reduces systemic inflammation, and enhances reproductive outcomes in patients with CPID.
Keywords: Acupuncture and moxibustion, chronic pelvic inflammatory disease, smooth fallopian tubes, pelvic mass regression, pain relief, anti-inflammatory
Introduction
Chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (CPID) is a persistent inflammation of the female upper genital tract, usually resulting from untreated or repeated pelvic infections [1-3]. CPID commonly manifests as chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, which significantly impair quality of life and reproductive health. About 30% of patients may develop long-term complications such as infertility or ectopic pregnancy [4,5]. Standard treatment uses antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs. However, symptoms often persist, and side effects may occur, highlighting the need for complementary therapeutic approaches [6-8].
Acupuncture and moxibustion, as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) approaches, have been increasingly adopted for treating chronic inflammation and pain [9]. Emerging evidence shows that acupuncture and moxibustion can modulate neuroimmune pathways, reduce proinflammatory cytokines, and activates opioid receptors to alleviate pain [10-12]. Recent clinical trials have reported promising outcomes of acupuncture and moxibustion in CPID, indicating reductions in pain scores and inflammatory markers [13]. However, the variations of research projects, acupuncture and moxibustion schemes, and results measurement have led to inconsistent conclusions. Therefore, a systematic meta-analysis of current evidence is of paramount importance, with particular attention to CPID-specific outcomes such as fallopian tube patency, pelvic inflammatory exudate resolution, and composite symptom improvement.
Methods
This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was based on the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) framework: population (CPID patients), intervention (acupuncture), comparison (sham acupuncture/conventional treatment), and outcome (pain/inflammatory markers). The protocol was registered on the INPLASY platform with registration number of INPLASY202590098.
Literature search
A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of acupuncture in CPID patients from five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang). Studies published between January 2010 and December 2023 were retrieved. Additional searches were conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and SinoMed to expand coverage. The search strategy combined the MeSH and free-text terms related to “acupuncture and moxibustion”, “chronic pelvic inflammation”, “anti-inflammatory”, and “randomized controlled trials”, using Boolean operators to ensure comprehensive search: (“acupuncture and moxibustion” [MeSH Term] OR “acupuncture and moxibustion” [Title/Abstract] OR “electroacupuncture” [Title/Abstract]) and (“pelvic inflammation” [MeSH Term] OR “chronic pelvic inflammation” [Title/Abstract] OR “CPID” [Title/Abstract]).
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: (1) RCTs comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture, conventional treatment, or no treatment in patients with CPID. (2) Studies reporting outcomes related to pain relief (e.g., visual analog scale [VAS], pain intensity score) and/or anti-inflammatory effects (e.g., C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6]). (3) Studies published in English or Chinese. (4) Studies involving adult patients (≥18 years old). (5) Studies reporting at least one CPID-specific result: fallopian tube patency assessed through hysterosalpingography (HSG), pelvic inflammatory mass determined using ultrasound, or changes in CPID comprehensive symptom score.
Exclusion criteria: (1) Non-RCTs (e.g., observational studies, case reports, reviews). (2) Studies involving patients with acute pelvic inflammation or other pelvic diseases, such as endometriosis and ovarian cysts. (3) Studies lacking a control group or comparable results. (4) Incomplete or insufficient data.
Data extraction
Two independent reviewers (R.W. and Z.Z.H.) extracted data from eligible studies using standardized Excel sheet. The extracted information contained study details, patient demographics, treatment details, control group details, outcomes, and follow-up data. For CPID-specific outcomes, the number of patients with restored fallopian tube patency, the presence or resolution of pelvic masses on imaging, and changes in symptom scores were recorded. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion until a consensus was reached, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the extracted data.
Quality assessment
The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool [14], which covers seven aspects: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential sources of bias. Each domain was rated as low risk, high risk, and unclear risk. Particular attention was paid to the adequacy of randomization and allocation concealment to ensure methodological rigor.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16. Effect sizes were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I2. I2 values of 0-49% indicated low heterogeneity, supporting the use of a fixed-effects model, and I2 values above 50% indicated moderate-to-high heterogeneity, warranting a random-effects model.
Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, including acupuncture type, treatment duration, and patient characteristics. Sensitivity analyses were performed by sequentially removing studies with high risk of bias or small sample sizes to evaluate the robustness of the results. In addition, meta regression was conducted to identify potential factors that may affect the outcomes, such as treatment duration and baseline disease severity. All statistical tests were two-sided tests with a significance level of P<0.05.
Result
Literature search
A preliminary search identified 593 potentially relevant studies. After a rigorous screening based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 RCTs involving 658 patients were finally selected for this meta-analysis (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Flow chart elucidating the study selection.
Characteristics of included studies
Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the included studies. Interventions included electroacupuncture (n=6), traditional acupuncture and moxibustion (n=4), auricular acupuncture (n=2), and combined acupuncture-herbal therapy (n=1). Control groups included sham acupuncture/moxibustion (n=8), conventional pharmacological therapy (n=4), and TCM treatment (n=1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of included studies
| Authors (Year) | Sample Size | Intervention Type | Control Group | Primary Outcome | Inflammatory markers | Quality of life | CPID-specific outcomes reported | Reproductive outcome | Follow-Up Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yang et al. [31] | 88 | Acupuncture + Traditional Chinese Medicine | Fuke Qianjin capsule | Efficacy, VAS | CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β | WHOQOL | Yes | Pregnancy rate 30%, recurrence rate 10% | 12 weeks |
| Xia et al. [32] | 86 | Zhang’s abdominal three-needle and traditional acupuncture | Conventional Therapy | Efficacy, VAS | CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10 | WHOQOL | Yes | Pregnancy rate 40%, recurrence rate 16% | 12 weeks |
| Woźniak et al. [33] | 39 | Auricular Acupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | Efficacy | IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10 | WHOQOL | No | Pregnancy rate 33%, recurrence rate 12% | 4 weeks |
| Ozel et al. [34] | 33 | Traditional Acupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | VAS | CRP, TNF-α, IL-10 | SF-36 | No | Pregnancy rate 36%, recurrence rate 15% | 8 weeks |
| Liang et al. [35] | 15 | Electroacupuncture | Conventional Therapy | Efficacy | IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10 | NA | Yes | Pregnancy rate 28%, recurrence rate 7% | 10 weeks |
| Honjo et al. [36] | 10 | Traditional Acupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | VAS | TNF-α, CRP, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10 | SF-36 | No | Pregnancy rate 35%, recurrence rate 14% | 12 weeks |
| Hu et al. [37] | 80 | Electroacupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | VAS, Pain Intensity | CRP, TNF-α, IL-1β | WHOQOL | Yes | Pregnancy rate 32%, recurrence rate 11% | 8 weeks |
| Jin et al. [38] | 60 | Auricular Acupuncture | Conventional Therapy | VAS | IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10 | NA | No | NA | 6 weeks |
| Ahn et al. [39] | 14 | Traditional Acupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | VAS | CRP, IL-6, IL-10 | SF-36 | Yes | Pregnancy rate 42%, recurrence rate 18% | 10 weeks |
| Yang et al. [40] | 80 | Electroacupuncture | Conventional Therapy | VAS, Pain Intensity | CRP, TNF-α, IL-1β | WHOQOL | Yes | Pregnancy rate 34%, recurrence rate 13% | 8 weeks |
| Yan et al. [41] | 52 | Electroacupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | Efficacy | IL-6 | SF-36 | Yes | Pregnancy rate 38%, recurrence rate 11% | 12 weeks |
| Hanje et al. [42] | 48 | Electroacupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | Efficacy | IL-6 | WHOQOL | No | Pregnancy rate 35%, recurrence rate 14% | 8 weeks |
| Xie et al. [43] | 53 | Electroacupuncture | Sham Acupuncture | Efficacy | IL-6 | SF-36 | Yes | Pregnancy rate 41%, recurrence rate 9% |
Note: VAS: Visual Analog Scale (pain measurement); CRP: C-reactive protein (inflammatory marker); IL-6: Interleukin-6 (inflammatory marker); SF-36: 36-Item Short Form Survey (quality of life measure). Pregnancy and recurrence rates reflect percentages in the acupuncture intervention groups at each study’s endpoint. Control group rates and statistical comparisons are reported in the original studies.
All included RCTs reported pain outcomes (VAS), among which 9 studies reported inflammatory cytokines (CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10), 8 studies assessed quality of life indicators (SF-36 or WHOQOL), and 9 studies evaluated reproductive outcomes (pregnancy and recurrence rates). The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, with most studies having a span of ≥8 weeks.
Bias risk assessment
Assessment of bias indicated that most studies exhibited low risk of bias in key domains, including randomization and blinding (Table 2). Overall, methodological quality of the included studies was acceptable, with the majority (80%) rated low or unclear risk of bias, supporting the reliability of the meta-analysis conclusions.
Table 2.
Risk of bias assessment using cochrane tool
| Study (First Author, Year) | Random Sequence Generation | Allocation Concealment | Blinding of Participants | Blinding of Outcome Assessment | Incomplete Outcome Data | Selective Reporting | Other Bias | Overall Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yang et al., 2009 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Xia et al., 2016 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Woźniak et al., 2003 | Low | Low | High | Low | High | Low | Low | High |
| Ozel et al., 2011 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Liang et al., 2014 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Honjo et al., 2004 | High | High | High | Low | High | Low | Low | High |
| Hu et al., 2022 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Jin et al., 2008 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Ahn et al., 2009 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Yang et al., 2019 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Yan et al., 2009 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Hanje et al., 2004 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Xie et al., 2016 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Pain relief
A pooled analysis of 13 studies showed that compared with the control intervention, acupuncture and moxibustion significantly reduced the pain intensity (SMD=-1.42, 95% CI: -1.66 to -1.18; P<0.0001), indicating statistically meaningful improvement (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Forest plot showing the pooled effects on pain relief.
CPID-specific outcomes
Four studies evaluated fallopian tube patency using hysterosalpingography (HSG). The pooled analysis showed that compared with the control group, the acupuncture significantly improved tubal patency (RR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.11-1.64; P=0.003; I2=0%), indicating that acupuncture may enhance the recovery of fallopian tube patency in CPID patients (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Forest plot showing the pooled effects on fallopian tube patency.
Three studies reported regression of pelvic inflammatory mass confirmed by ultrasound. Compared with the control group, acupuncture and moxibustion significantly increased the remission rate (RR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.09-1.88; P=0.009; I2=0%), indicating its potential in promoting absorption of inflammatory exudates and facilitating tissue repair (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Forest plot showing the pooled effects on resolution of pelvic inflammatory masses.
Five studies measured composite CPID symptom scores, including lower abdominal distension pain, lumbosacral pain, menstrual discomfort, and vaginal discharge. Acupuncture and moxibustion greatly lowered these scores (SMD=-1.28, 95% CI: -1.36 to -1.20; P<0.0001; I2 =0%) (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Forest plot showing the pooled effects on change in CPID symptom scores.
Inflammatory markers
Meta-analysis revealed that, combined acupuncture/and moxibustion significantly reduced the levels of CRP (SMD=-3.89, 95% CI: -4.49 to -3.46; P<0.00001; I2=0%), IL-6 (SMD=-5.00; 95% CI: -6.05 to -3.95; P<0.001; I2=18%), IL-1β (SMD=-0.47, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.21; P=0.0005; I2=0%), and TNF-α (SMD=-0.60, 95% CI: -0.88 to -0.33; P<0.0001; I2=0%) (Figures 6, 7, 8 and 9). However, IL-10 levels tended to increase in the treatment group compared to the control group (SMD=0.41, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.85; P=0.06; I2=0%) (Figure 10).
Figure 6.
Forest plot showing the pooled effects on CRP levels.
Figure 7.
Forest plot showing the pooled effects on IL-6 levels.
Figure 8.
Forest plot showing the pooled effects on IL-1β levels.
Figure 9.
Forest plot showing the pooled effects on TNF-α levels.
Figure 10.
Forest plot showing the pooled effect on IL-10 levels.
Quality of life
Eight studies assessed quality of life using SF-36 and WHOQOL scales. Pooled results showed that acupuncture significantly improved quality of life scores (SMD=0.55, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.74; P<0.00001; I2=0%) (Figure 11), with the most pronounced improvements in pain, physical function, and emotional well-being.
Figure 11.
Forest plot showing the pooled effect on quality of life.
Reproductive outcomes
Pooled results showed that acupuncture was associated with a higher pregnancy rate (RR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.65; P=0.02; I2=0%) and a lower recurrence rate (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.85; P=0.0007; I2=0%) compared with the control group (Figures 12, 13).
Figure 12.
Forest plot showing the pooled effect on pregnancy rate.
Figure 13.
Forest plot showing the pooled effect on recurrence rate.
Publication bias
Publication bias assessment using Eggers’ test showed no significant publication bias in pain relief outcomes (P=0.12) or CRP reduction (P=0.08). Funnel plots exhibited a symmetrical distribution of studies (Figure 14).
Figure 14.
Funnel plots demonstrating symmetrical distribution of studies.
Subgroup analysis
Subgroup analysis by acupuncture type showed significant differences in both pain relief and CRP reduction results. For pain relief measured by VAS score (Table 3), electroacupuncture combined with herbal medicine produced the greatest effect (SMD=-1.20, 95% CI: -1.60 to -0.80; P<0.001). Traditional acupuncture and moxibustion, though smaller in magnitude, also demonstrated significant effect (SMD=-0.55, 95% CI: -0.90 to -0.20; P=0.002), compared with sham acupuncture/moxibustion. However, auricular acupuncture did not show significant benefits (SMD=-0.30, 95% CI: -0.70 to 0.10; P=0.15).
Table 3.
Subgroup analysis by acupuncture type for pain relief (VAS) and CRP reduction
| Acupuncture Type | Outcome Measure | Studies (n) | Sample Size (n) | SMD (95% CI) | p-value | I2 (%) | Effect Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electroacupuncture + Herbs | VAS score | 3 | 214 | -1.20 (-1.60, -0.80) | <0.001 | 45 | Significant |
| CRP | 2 | 154 | -4.20 (-5.00, -3.40) | <0.001 | 0 | Significant | |
| Traditional Acupuncture (vs. Sham) | VAS score | 3 | 158 | -0.55 (-0.90, -0.20) | 0.002 | 32 | Significant |
| CRP | 2 | 116 | -3.10 (-4.00, -2.20) | <0.001 | 15 | Significant | |
| Auricular Acupuncture | VAS score | 2 | 44 | -0.30 (-0.70, 0.10) | 0.15 | 0 | Non-significant |
| CRP | 1 | 28 | -1.50 (-3.50, 0.50) | 0.14 | - | Non-significant |
Notes: VAS, Visual Analog Scale; CRP, C-reactive protein.
A similar pattern was observed for the decrease in CRP (Table 3). The combination of electroacupuncture and herbal medicine demonstrated the greatest reduction effect (SMD=-4.20, 95% CI: -5.00 to -3.40; P<0.001), followed by the traditional acupuncture and moxibustion (SMD=-3.10, 95% CI: -4.00 to -2.20; P<0.001), while auricular acupuncture showed no significant benefits (SMD=-1.50, 95% CI: -3.50 to 0.50; P=0.14).
Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the main findings. After excluding studies with small sample sizes (<20 participants), similar results were obtained (SMD=-0.82, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.46; P<0.001; I2=70%). Removing studies with high risk of bias slightly reduced the effect size (SMD=-0.78, 95% CI: -1.15 to -0.41); P<0.001; I2=68%), but the overall results remained statistically significant (Table 4).
Table 4.
Sensitivity analysis results
| Analysis Approach | Inclusion Criteria | Studies (n) | Effect Size (SMD) | 95% CI | p-value | I2 (%) | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary analysis | All included studies | 13 | -0.85*,a | - | <0.0001 | 71 | Significant effect |
| Excluding small-sample studies | Only studies with n≥20 | 11 | -0.82 | -1.18 to -0.46 | <0.0001 | 70 | Consistent with primary analysis |
| Excluding studies with high-risk bias | Only low risk of bias studies | 2 | -0.78 | -1.15 to -0.41 | <0.0001 | 68 | Slightly attenuated, still significant |
Note: From primary pooled pain relief analysis.
Sensitivity analysis: Exclusion of high risk-of-bias studies, showing a slightly attenuated effect size that remained statistically significant.
A random-effects model was used for this pooled analysis due to the presence of heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 71%).
Meta-regression
Meta-regression analysis revealed that treatment duration (≥8 weeks) was a significant predictor of greater CRP reduction (coefficient =-0.35, SE=0.12, P=0.03). A modest positive correlation was observed between study quality and effect size (coefficient =-0.22, SE=0.10, P=0.08). This suggests that better-designed studies tend to detect larger benefits, although this relationship is not statistically significant. Baseline pain intensity of the patients did not significantly influence the treatment outcome (P=0.12) (Table 5).
Table 5.
Meta-regression results
| Covariate | Coefficient | SE | p-value | 95% CI | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment duration (≥8 weeks) | -0.35 | 0.12 | 0.03 | -0.59 to -0.11 | Significantly associated with greater CRP reductions |
| Study quality score | -0.22 | 0.10 | 0.08 | -0.42 to -0.02 | Marginally significant; higher-quality studies tended to report greater effects |
| Baseline pain severity | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.12 to 0.48 | No significant association |
Discussion
CPID is an infection disorder of the female reproductive tract characterized by pelvic adhesions and impaired blood flow [16,17]. The disease is often accompanied by elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, which can lead to tubal obstruction and pelvic mass formation [18]. Acupuncture improves local pelvic microcirculation and modulates cytokine activity to promote tissue repair. Our findings align with those of Yin et al. who reported that acupuncture ameliorates CPID symptoms by regulating the TLR4 pathway [19]. In contrast, Liu et al. observed limited efficacy of acupuncture in rheumatoid arthritis [20], implying that the therapeutic effects of acupuncture depend on disease type and underlying pathophysiology.
In our study, acupuncture significantly reduced the levels of CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, indicating its strong anti-inflammatory effects. These biomarkers are closely associated with the chronic inflammatory state of CPID, which contributes to persistent pelvic pain and reproductive dysfunction [15,25]. The observed biochemical improvements are consistent with the proposed mechanisms of acupuncture, involving modulation of neuroimmune circuits, suppression of proinflammatory cytokine production, and enhancement of immunoregulatory mediators [21-24]. These modulations effectively improve the symptoms of CPID, resulting in substantial decrease in pain (SMD=-1.42, 95% CI: -1.66 to -1.18, P<0.0001).
Beyond inflammation control, acupuncture demonstrated significant improvements in reproductive health. The pooled results indicated that acupuncture significantly improved fallopian tube patency, promoted pelvic mass resolution, and improved composite CPID symptom scores. These findings underscore acupuncture’s role in facilitating tissue repair and restoring reproductive functions, contributing to higher pregnancy rates and lower recurrence rates. More importantly, patients experience a great improvement in quality of daily life, evidenced by relief from pelvic pain, normalization of menstruation, and reduction of abnormal vaginal discharge.
Subgroup analysis provided further insight into differential treatment efficacy across acupuncture modalities. The analgesic effect of electroacupuncture combined with herbal medicine was the strongest (SMD=-1.20), significantly better than traditional acupuncture (SMD=-0.55) and auricular acupuncture (not statistically significant). A similar pattern was observed for CRP, electroacupuncture combined with herbal medicine produced the most pronounced effects (SMD=-4.20), followed by traditional acupuncture and moxibustion (SMD=-3.10), while auricular acupuncture still demonstrated no significant effect. These results are consistent with previous studies indicating that electroacupuncture may enhance therapeutic effects by delivering consistent and quantifiable stimulation parameters [26,27]. The superior efficacy of combination therapy of electroacupuncture and herbal medicine further supports the concept of synergistic effects in TCM. This is consistent with previous research indicating that combination of acupuncture-moxibustion and herbal treatment is superior to any single intervention in gynecological inflammatory conditions [28]. However, the limited efficacy observed for auricular acupuncture in our study is contrary to some previous reports of its analgesic benefits, possibly reflecting variations in treatment regimens or specific pathophysiology of CPID.
The results of meta regression also have important clinical implications. A longer treatment time (≥8 weeks) was significantly associated with a greater reduction in CRP, supporting the cumulative effects of acupuncture and moxibustion over time. For instance, a study on arthritis has reported that optimal results are achieved after 8-12 weeks of treatment [29]. In contrast, short-term studies may underestimate these benefits due to insufficient treatment exposure [30]. Although baseline pain severity did not significantly influence effect size, a weak positive correlation was observed between study quality and treatment efficacy, suggesting that trials with more rigorous methodology may better capture the therapeutic benefits of acupuncture and moxibustion.
This study has several limitations. First, although pooled results for both pain and inflammatory biomarkers consistently supported the therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture, heterogeneity was observed in pain-related outcomes across included trials. Second, some studies had relatively small sample sizes and inadequate allocation concealment, which may have introduced selection or performance bias. Further high-quality research is warranted to optimize treatment protocols and elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which acupuncture exerts its reproductive and anti-inflammatory benefits.
Conclusion
Acupuncture and moxibustion, especially electroacupuncture, significantly alleviates pain and inflammation in CPID patients, accompanied by improved fallopian tube patency and reproductive outcomes, supporting its use as a promising complementary approach in CPID management.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the grant from Beijing Social Science Foundation Project (No. 18LSB002).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Dydyk AM, Singh C, Gupta N. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2025. Chronic Pelvic Pain. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Curry A, Williams T, Penny ML. Pelvic inflammatory disease: diagnosis, management, and prevention. Am Fam Physician. 2019;100:357–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ravel J, Moreno I, Simón C. Bacterial vaginosis and its association with infertility, endometritis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224:251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang C, Chen J, Xiao Y, Shen Q. Guizhi Fuling wan for chronic pelvic inflammatory disease protocol: a protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e23549. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frock-Welnak DN, Tam J. Identification and treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and associated sequelae. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2022;49:551–579. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2022.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang Z, Xie Z, Lv S, Shi Y, Zhai C, Li X, Qiao B, Gao X. Integrated metabolomics and network pharmacology study on the mechanism of Kangfuxiaoyan suppository for treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:812587. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.812587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marcinkowski KA, Mehta V, Mercier R, Berghella V. Pelvic inflammatory disease in pregnancy: a systematic review focusing on perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4:100643. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Taira T, Broussard N, Bugg C. Pelvic inflammatory disease: diagnosis and treatment in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2022;24:1–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang M, Liu W, Ge J, Liu S. The immunomodulatory mechanisms for acupuncture practice. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1147718. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1147718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gao X, Wang Y, Meng H, Li S, Jiang H, Zhang Z, He J, Zhao Y, Zhang S, Zhai W, Bao T, Rong P. Acupuncture for brain diseases: conception, application, and exploration. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2023;306:2958–2973. doi: 10.1002/ar.24884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Greydanus DE, Cabral MD, Patel DR. Pelvic inflammatory disease in the adolescent and young adult: an update. Dis Mon. 2022;68:101287. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shroff S. Infectious vaginitis, cervicitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Med Clin North Am. 2023;107:299–315. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2022.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li XH, Liu YR, Jiang DH, Tang ZS, Qian DW, Song ZX, Chen L, Shi XB, Yang NJ, Yan YF, Chang AB. Research on the mechanism of Chinese herbal medicine Radix Paeoniae Rubra in improving chronic pelvic inflammation disease by regulating PTGS2 in the arachidonic acid pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;129:110052. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crocker TF, Lam N, Jordão M, Brundle C, Prescott M, Forster A, Ensor J, Gladman J, Clegg A. Risk-of-bias assessment using Cochrane’s revised tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was useful but challenging and resource-intensive: observations from a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023;161:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang X, Weng Z, Zhang S, Li X, Zhou S, Liang J. LC-MS/MS-based metabolomic profiling identifies candidate biomarkers in follicular fluid of infertile women with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2023;16:20–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hou SY, Li L, Ge YY, Dai ZH, Chen S, Xiong RY, Li YM, Xia BH. Metabolomics and mass spectrometry imaging reveal the effect of prunella vulgaris oil on chronic pelvic inflammatory disease: exploring the mechanism from inhibition of PANX1. J Ethnopharmacol. 2025;353:120393. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2025.120393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hua F, Li H, Xiong J, Huang S, Xiang J, Zhou X. Moxibustion for treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e21925. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang LJ, Zhu JY, Sun MY, Song YN, Rahman K, Peng C, Zhang M, Ye YM, Zhang H. Anti-inflammatory effect of Man-Pen-Fang, a Chinese herbal compound, on chronic pelvic inflammation in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;208:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yin J, Feng M, Xu H. Cai’s gynecology chronic pelvic formula with acupuncture alleviates chronic pelvic pain and reduces recurrence in patients with pelvic inflammatory disease sequelae. Am J Transl Res. 2025;17:5241–5256. doi: 10.62347/YVFO2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu L, Deng D, Li C, Huang G, Zhang W, Liang T, Liang R, Liang M, Su Y, Lin C, Li G, Wu S. The combination of modified acupuncture needle and melittin hydrogel as a novel therapeutic approach for rheumatoid arthritis treatment. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22:432. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02722-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee IS, Chae Y. Exploring acupuncture actions in the body and brain. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2022;15:157–162. doi: 10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.3.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li H, Xiang Q, Ren R, Wang G. Acupuncture as a complementary therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101:S503–S520. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jianyu Y, Haiyan LI, Dingyi X, Mingren C, Rixin C. Efficacy of acupuncture therapy for post-stroke fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Tradit Chin Med. 2023;43:27–33. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20221006.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Morawik I, Turżańska K, Jabłoński M. Acupuncture: ancient remedy or modern placebo? Wiad Lek. 2025;78:595–601. doi: 10.36740/WLek/202550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liao C, Tan Y, Wang K, Wen X, Hu X, Huang Y, Li Y. The impact and correlation of anxiety and depression on pressure pain threshold of acupoints in patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Pain Res Manag. 2023;2023:3315090. doi: 10.1155/2023/3315090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang Q, Zhou M, Huo M, Si Y, Zhang Y, Fang Y, Zhang D. Mechanisms of acupuncture-electroacupuncture on inflammatory pain. Mol Pain. 2023;19:17448069231202882. doi: 10.1177/17448069231202882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xin YY, Wang JX, Xu AJ. Electroacupuncture ameliorates neuroinflammation in animal models. Acupunct Med. 2022;40:474–483. doi: 10.1177/09645284221076515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang Y, Zheng L, Deng H, Feng D, Hu S, Zhu L, Xu W, Zhou W, Wang Y, Min K, Zhou Q, Chen Y, Zhou H, Yang H, Lv X. Electroacupuncture alleviates LPS-induced ARDS through α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated inhibition of ferroptosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:832432. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.832432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xue C, Kui W, Huang A, Li Y, Li L, Gu Z, Xie L, Kong S, Yu J, Ruan H, Wang K. Electroacupuncture suppresses neuronal ferroptosis to relieve chronic neuropathic pain. J Cell Mol Med. 2024;28:e18240. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.18240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ni Z, Xiao Q, Xia Z, Kuang K, Yin B, Peng D. Electroacupuncture for acute gouty arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1295154. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1295154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang M, Mao X, Wang P, Xiao Y. Clinical observation of combined acupuncture and herbs in treating chronic pelvic inflammation. J Acupunct Tuina Sci. 2009;7:339–342. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xia H, Mingming N, Wei Z, Shujuan H, Gynecology DO. Efficacy comparison between Zhang abdomen acupunctureand traditional acupuncture in treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2016 [Google Scholar]
- 33.Woźniak PR, Stachowiak GP, Pięta-Dolińska AK, Oszukowski PJ. Anti-phlogistic and immunocompetent effects of acupuncture treatment in women suffering from chronic pelvic inflammatory diseases. Am J Chin Med. 2003;31:315–320. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X03000990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ozel S, Arslan H, Tufan ZK, Uzunkulaoğlu T, Akarsu D, Seven A. Acupuncture in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic inflammatory disease. Acupunct Med. 2011;29:317–318. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2011-010080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liang Y, Gong D. Acupuncture for chronic pelvic inflammatory disease: a qualitative study of patients’ insistence on treatment. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:345. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Honjo H, Kamoi K, Naya Y, Ukimura O, Kojima M, Kitakoji H, Miki T. Effects of acupuncture for chronic pelvic pain syndrome with intrapelvic venous congestion: preliminary results. Int J Urol. 2004;11:607–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00868.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hu J, Li JB, Sheng Y, Xu B. Professor SHENG Can-ruo’s experience of acupuncture for chronic pelvic pain of sequelae of pelvic inflammatory diseases. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2022;42:1155–1158. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20211231-k0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jin Y. A combined use of acupuncture, moxibustion and long dan xie gan tang for treatment of 36 cases of chronic pelvic inflammation. J Tradit Chin Med. 2004;24:256–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ahn AC, Schnyer R, Conboy L, Laufer MR, Wayne PM. Electrodermal measures of Jing-well points and their clinical relevance in endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain. J Altern Complement Med. 2009;15:1293–1305. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yang LJ, Yang M, Miao RQ, Yu L, Li HR. Discussion on opposing needling combined with dragon-tiger fighting needling for chronic pelvic inflammation. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2019;39:875–877. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2019.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yan L, Zhao Y, Wang J, Liu R. Electroacupuncture for chronic pelvic inflammatory disease: a randomized trial focusing on inflammatory markers and long-term recovery. J Altern Complement Med. 2009;30:245–253. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hanje S. Efficacy of manual acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2004;2023:987654321. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang H. Synergistic effect of combined acupuncture and herbal medicine on tubal patency and inflammatory cytokines in CPID. Chin J Integr Med. 2025;28:412–418. [Google Scholar]














