Skip to main content
. 2002 Apr;46(4):1105–1107. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1105-1107.2002

TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of tested isolates

Agenta MIC (μg/ml)b
% Susceptible strains
50% 90%
P. aeruginosa
    CF, nonmucoid (n = 50)
        CAZ >32 >32 34
        CIP 2 8 78
        IMP >16 >16 42
        TOB 8 256 60
        ZOS 128 >128 38
    CF, mucoid (n = 50)
        CAZ >32 >32 34
        CIP 2 4 70
        IMP 8 >16 52
        TOB 4 64 76
        ZOS 128 >128 36
    Non-CF (n = 50)
        CAZ 8 >32 66
        CIP 0.5 4 78
        IMP 4 >16 62
        TOB 1 64 80
        ZOS 32 >128 68
B. cepacia complex (n = 50)
    CHL >32 >32 10
    DOX >32 >32 20
    MER 8 >16 58
    TMP-SMZ 16 16 14
S. maltophilia (n = 50)
    DOX 2 8 98
    TIM 16 >128 66
    TMP-SMZ 8 >16 24
A. xylosoxidans (n = 50)
    CAZ 32 >32 34
    CHL 32 >32 26
    CIP >8 >8 2
    TIM >128 >128 36
    TOB >256 >256 2
a

Abbreviations used: CAZ, ceftazidime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; IMP, imipenem; TOB, tobramycin; ZOS, piperacillin-tazobactam; CHL, chloramphenicol; DOX, doxycycline; MER, meropenem; TMP-SMZ, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; TIM, ticarcillin-clavulanate.

b

50% and 90%, MICs at which 50 and 90% of isolates are inhibited, respectively.