Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Dec 17;20(12):e0335738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335738

Frequency and perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on training and performance in female endurance athletes

Heather M Hamilton 1,*, Natalie M Yarish 2, Kristin E Heron 3
Editor: Luiz F Baccaro4
PMCID: PMC12711079  PMID: 41406071

Abstract

Menopause is associated with several negative health concerns and common menopausal symptoms. Physical activity is essential to mitigate these negative effects, but menopausal symptoms may interfere with participation in physical activity. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and the perceived negative effect of menopausal symptoms among female endurance athletes. Female runners, cyclists, swimmers, and triathletes 40–60 years of age were recruited (N = 187). Participants completed an online, anonymous survey that included self-reported menopausal status; the Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS), a validated measure for assessing menopausal symptoms; and the perceived effect of menopausal symptoms on training and performance. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine differences in total MRS scores among participants reporting no, slight, moderate, and strong negative effects of symptoms on training and performance. The most commonly reported menopausal symptoms were sleep problems (88%), physical and mental exhaustion (83%), sexual problems (74%), anxiety (72%), irritability (68%), depressive mood (67%), weight gain (67%), hot flushes (65%), and joint and muscular discomfort (63%). The symptoms that were perceived to most negatively affect training and performance were joint and muscular discomfort, weight gain, sleep problems, and physical and mental exhaustion. Participants with a perceived strong negative effect of symptoms on training and performance demonstrated higher total MRS scores compared to participants reporting no negative effect or slight negative effect of symptoms on training and performance (p’s ≤ .001), suggesting women with more severe menopausal symptoms had a greater perceived negative effect of symptoms on training and performance. In summary, frequency of menopausal symptoms among female endurance athletes is high and severity of menopausal symptoms is similar to that reported in the general population. Despite high physical activity levels in this population, clinicians should address these symptoms to promote continued participation in physical activity.

Introduction

Menopause is an inevitable phase of life for the female population. The menopause transition is characterized by a steep decline in estrogen production, which is a significant alteration in the hormone profile compared to females in the reproductive phase [1]. Beginning in perimenopause, changes in follicle stimulating hormone and estradiol production contribute to variability in menstrual cycle length, and a female enters postmenopause after 12 months without menses [1]. As a result of the hormonal fluctuations occurring during perimenopause and into postmenopause, prevalence of menopausal symptoms is high during this time. Commonly reported symptoms include vasomotor symptoms, e.g., hot flushes, reported in up to 80% of females [2]; sleep problems, 40–60% [3]; depressive mood, 74.6% [4]; joint and muscular discomfort, 77% [4]; and genitourinary symptoms of menopause, e.g., vaginal dryness, urinary incontinence, 40–60% [5]. These symptoms have a negative effect on health-related quality of life and lead to higher healthcare utilization [6]. Considering increased life expectancy, this has significant population health and economic implications, with an estimated 73 million females either in menopausal transition or post-menopause in the United States [7]. However, it is unclear how specific menopausal symptoms may be affecting participation in physical activity.

Physical activity is an essential component of healthy aging, particularly for menopausal females [8]. Physical activity combats the musculoskeletal changes associated with menopause [9], reduces the risk of chronic disease [10], and improves quality of life in menopausal females [8]. Middle-aged females are encouraged to follow established recommendations for physical activity [11], including both aerobic exercise and resistance training for optimal health outcomes [12]. Females are increasingly participating in endurance sports (e.g., running, swimming, cycling) into older ages [1316], but menopause has not been well-studied among female athletes [17]. While it is well-established that physical activity is beneficial in reducing menopausal symptoms [18,19], menopausal symptom prevalence is still high among physically active women [20]. Bothersome menopausal symptoms may still interfere with participation in physical activity and sport. In one of the few studies considering menopausal symptoms in female athletes, Ussher et al. (2008) studied female master swimmers and reported that perimenopausal swimmers had the greatest reduction in swimming volume and intensity compared to premenopausal and postmenopausal swimmers, with 24% of participants reporting that menopausal symptoms negatively affected their training [17]. What is unknown are specific barriers that are contributing to decreased volume and intensity of exercise in active menopausal females.

Because of the overwhelming benefits of physical activity in menopausal females [9,2123], it is imperative to understand and address any potential physiological barriers to physical activity to provide targeted intervention strategies to promote participation in physical activity during this crucial time in mid-life. However, little is known about specific menopausal symptoms that menopausal athletes experience and how these symptoms may interfere with physical activity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and severity of menopausal symptoms in female endurance athletes. Additionally, we examined the differences in menopausal symptom severity among participants who reported no negative effects, slight negative effects, moderate negative effects, and strong negative effects of menopausal symptoms on training and performance.

Materials and methods

This study was reviewed and approved by the University Health Sciences Human Subjects Ethics Committee. Given that identifying information about participants was not collected, this study was determined to be exempt from requiring a signed informed consent document. However, a notification statement was provided, as requested and approved by the university ethics committee, which provided participants with a description of the study prior to data collection and notified that completion of the survey indicated informed consent to participate. Participants were recruited from February 6, 2024 through August 31, 2024 via social media, word of mouth, and local and regional athletic groups in the United States. Interested participants completed a brief screening survey via Qualtrics, and if participants met the inclusion criteria, an investigator emailed them the link to complete the survey. Inclusion criteria included (1) females ages 40–60 years, (2) participating in running, cycling, swimming, and/or triathlons for at least the past 5 years, (3) participating in running, cycling, and/or swimming at least 3 days per week, and (4) participating in a total of at least 3 hours of physical activity per week. Participants were excluded if they were male or if they did not meet minimum physical activity volume described in the inclusion criteria. The survey was administered anonymously through Qualtrics. Participants were required to complete the menopausal status and Menopausal Rating Scale questions for the questionnaire to be considered valid.

Measures

Menopausal status.

Participants self-reported their menopausal status as premenopausal (“continuing to experience regular menstrual cycles, or no changes in menstruation compared to what is usually experienced”), perimenopausal (“periods starting to become irregular; experiencing changes in frequency, length, or nature of bleeding in menstrual cycles”), or postmenopausal (“have not experienced a menstrual cycle in 12 months or more.”) [1]. If participants reported being postmenopausal, they were asked if they had a natural or a surgical menopause. All participants were asked if they are currently taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

Menopausal rating scale.

The Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS) has been validated for assessing menopausal symptoms and health-related quality of life in menopausal females [24]. Participants rated 11 menopausal symptoms (e.g., hot flushes, sleep problems, bladder problems) on a 5-point Likert scale, i.e., (0)-none, (1) mild, (2) moderate, (3) severe, or (4)-very severe [24,25]. A total menopausal symptom rating score was calculated by summing all 11 items. Based on results of a previous study investigating menopausal symptoms among Master swimmers [17], weight gain was also included as another menopausal symptom that was rated on the same 5-point Likert scale, but this symptom was not included in the total MRS score calculation.

Perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on training and performance.

If a participant rated any MRS symptom as greater than “none,” survey logic was used to ask the participant: “How do you feel that [symptom] has affected your training in your primary activity?” and “How do you feel that [symptom] has affected your performance in your primary activity?” Possible responses included: “[Symptom] has not affected my training/performance,” “[Symptom] has a slight negative effect on my training/performance,” “[Symptom] has a moderate negative effect on my training/performance,” or “[Symptom] has a strong negative effect on my training/performance.” All participants were asked about menopausal symptoms in general affecting training and performance with the questions: “In general, do you perceive that your menopausal symptoms have negatively affected your training in your primary activity?” and “In general, do you perceive that your menopausal symptoms have negatively affected your performance in your primary activity?” with possible responses including: “not experiencing menopausal symptoms,” “no negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training/performance,” “slight negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training/performance,” “moderate negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training/performance,” and “strong negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training/performance.” Finally, participants were asked about their general health: “In general, would you say your health is:” “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair,” or “poor.”

Statistical analysis. Proportions and descriptive statistics were primarily used to report the data. Differences in age and total MRS score among pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis test, as data were not normally distributed. Kruskal-Wallis was also used to determine differences in total MRS scores among participants reporting no negative effect, slight negative effect, moderate negative effect, and strong negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training and performance. IBM SPSS Statistics (version 29) was used for all statistical analyses and level of significance was set at p < .05.

Results

Out of 384 completed screening surveys received, 265 potential participants met inclusion criteria and were emailed the link to complete the survey. There were 187 female endurance athletes who participated in this survey study, yielding a 71% response rate. The most common primary endurance sport among all participants was running (55%, n = 102), followed by swimming (22%, n = 41), cycling (14%, n = 27), and triathlon (9%, n = 17). Eighteen percent (n = 34) reported being premenopausal, 39% (n = 73) reported being perimenopausal, and 43% (n = 80) reported being postmenopausal. Fifty-three participants (28%) reported current HRT use; most of these were perimenopausal (n = 22) or postmenopausal (n = 29). Most of the postmenopausal participants (n = 66, 83%) reported a natural menopause.

Frequency of menopausal symptoms among our sample of female endurance athletes is high (Table 1). The most common menopausal symptoms reported were sleep problems (88%, n = 164) and physical and mental exhaustion (83%, n = 155). Other common symptoms reported were sexual problems (74%, n = 139), anxiety (72%, n = 136), irritability (68%, n = 128), depressive mood (67%, n = 125), weight gain (67%, n = 126), hot flushes (65%, n = 122), and joint and muscular discomfort (63%, n = 118). Other reported symptoms include vaginal dryness (59%, n = 110), bladder problems (52%, n = 97), and heart discomfort (41%, n = 77). Most participants reported these symptoms as mild or moderate, with few participants rating the symptoms as severe or very severe (Table 1).

Table 1. Menopausal Rating Scale scores among pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal female endurance athletes.

Menopausal symptom None Mild Moderate Severe Very Severe Total reporting symptom

(n = 187)
Pre Peri Post Pre Peri Post Pre Peri Post Pre Peri Post Pre Peri Post
Hot flushes 62% (21) 22% (16) 35% (28) 32% (11) 52% (38) 41% (33) 6% (2) 22% (16) 20% (16) 0% (0) 4% (3) 3% (2) 0% (0) 0% (0) 1% (1) 65% (122)
Dryness of vagina 56% (19) 47% (34) 30% (24) 29% (10) 34% (25) 23% (18) 15% (5) 11% (8) 30% (24) 0% (0) 6% (4) 11% (9) 0% (0) 3% (2) 6% (5) 59% (110)
Joint and muscular discomfort 56% (19) 30% (22) 35% (28) 35% (12) 30% (22) 34% (27) 9% (3) 27% (20) 25% (20) 0% (0) 11% (8) 4% (3) 0% (0) 1% (1) 3% (2) 63% (118)
Heart discomfort 68% (23) 48% (35) 65% (52) 29% (10) 36% (26) 21% (17) 3% (1) 14% (10) 13% (10) 0% (0) 1% (1) 1% (1) 0% (0) 1% (1) 0% (0) 41% (77)
Sleep problems 24% (8) 7% (5) 13% (10) 32% (11) 33% (24) 29% (23) 35% (12) 37% (27) 43% (34) 9% (3) 19% (14) 16% (13) 0% (0) 4% (3) 0% (0) 88% (164)
Depressive mood 35% (12) 19% (14) 45% (36) 53% (18) 38% (28) 33% (26) 12% (4) 34% (25) 16% (13) 0% (0) 8% (6) 6% (5) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0) 67% (125)
Irritability 41% (14) 15% (11) 43% (34) 35% (12) 38% (28) 41% (33) 24% (8) 37% (27) 13% (10) 0% (0) 8% (6) 3% (2) 0% (0) 1% (1) 1% (1) 68% (128)
Anxiety 29% (10) 15% (11) 38% (30) 53% (18) 37% (27) 38% (30) 15% (5) 41% (30) 20% (16) 3% (1) 6% (4) 5% (4) 0% (0) 1% (1) 0% (0) 72% (136)
Physical and mental exhaustion 29% (10) 7% (5) 21% (17) 29% (10) 33% (24) 48% (38) 38% (13) 41% (30) 21% (17) 3% (1) 12% (9) 9% (7) 0% (0) 7% (5) 1% (1) 83% (155)
Sexual problems 38% (13) 16% (12) 29% (23) 38% (13) 41% (30) 20% (16) 21% (7) 22% (16) 28% (22) 3% (1) 15% (11) 14% (11) 0% (0) 6% (4) 10% (8) 74% (139)
Bladder problems 74% (25) 43% (31) 43% (34) 23% (8) 26% (19) 34% (27) 3% (1) 23% (17) 18% (14) 0% (0) 6% (4) 5% (4) 0% (0) 3% (2) 1% (1) 52% (97)
Weight gain 56% (19) 29% (21) 26% (21) 29% (10) 36% (26) 34% (27) 9% (3) 20% (15) 25% (20) 6% (2) 8% (6) 11% (9) 0% (0) 7% (5) 4% (3) 67% (126)

Scores reported as: total percentage of premenopausal (Pre; n = 34), perimenopausal (Peri; n = 73), and postmenopausal (Post; n = 80) participants reporting score (n).

Several menopausal symptoms were reported to negatively affect training (Table 2) and performance (Table 3). The symptoms most likely to be perceived to have a negative effect on training and performance are joint and muscular discomfort (97% reporting a negative effect on training and 91% reporting a negative effect on performance), sleep problems (92% reporting a negative effect on training and 89% reporting a negative effect on performance), physical and mental exhaustion (87% reporting a negative effect on training and 88% reporting a negative effect on performance), and weight gain (79% reporting a negative effect on training and 88% reporting a negative effect on performance). In response to the questions, “In general, do you perceive that your menopausal symptoms have negatively affected your training/performance in your primary activity?”, more perimenopausal and postmenopausal participants reported a general negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training (Fig 1) and performance (Fig 2) compared to premenopausal participants. The vast majority of all participants reported their general health as “excellent” (38%, n = 70) or “very good” (46%, n = 84) (Fig 3).

Table 2. Perceived effect of menopausal symptoms on training in female endurance athletes.

Menopausal symptom No effect Slight negative effect Moderate negative effect Strong negative effect
Hot flushes

(n = 118)
67% (79) 28% (33) 5% (6) 0% (0)
Heart discomfort

(n = 75)
55% (41) 33% (25) 8% (6) 4% (3)
Joint and muscular discomfort

(n = 116)
3% (3) 39% (45) 41% (47) 18% (21)
Sleep problems

(n = 160)
8% (12) 46% (73) 38% (60) 9% (15)
Physical and mental exhaustion

(n = 153)
13% (20) 41% (63) 34% (52) 12% (18)
Depressive mood

(n = 122)
32% (39) 44% (54) 15% (18) 9% (11)
Irritability

(n = 124)
51% (63) 36% (44) 10% (13) 3% (4)
Anxiety

(n = 132)
40% (53) 43% (57) 13% (17) 4% (5)
Bladder problems

(n = 95)
46% (44) 36% (34) 13% (12) 5% (5)
Sexual problems

(n = 137)
93% (128) 7% (9) 0% (0) 0% (0)
Dryness of vagina

(n = 108)
86% (93) 11% (12) 2% (2) 1% (1)
Weight gain

(n = 124)
21% (26) 35% (44) 29% (36) 15% (18)

Results reported as: total percentage of participants reporting score (n).

Table 3. Perceived effect of menopausal symptoms on performance in female endurance athletes.

Menopausal symptom No effect Slight negative effect Moderate negative effect Strong negative effect
Hot flushes

(n = 118)
72% (85) 20% (24) 8% (9) 0% (0)
Heart discomfort

(n = 75)
57% (43) 29% (22) 9% (7) 4% (3)
Joint and muscular discomfort

(n = 116)
9% (10) 37% (43) 35% (41) 19% (22)
Sleep problems

(n = 160)
11% (17) 48% (76) 33% (52) 9% (15)
Physical and mental exhaustion

(n = 153)
12% (18) 42% (65) 33% (51) 12% (19)
Depressive mood

(n = 122)
35% (43) 44% (54) 12% (15) 8% (10)
Irritability

(n = 124)
55% (68) 31% (39) 10% (13) 3% (4)
Anxiety

(n = 132)
43% (57) 38% (50) 12% (16) 7% (9)
Bladder problems

(n = 95)
56% (53) 31% (29) 8% (8) 5% (5)
Sexual problems

(n = 137)
93% (128) 6% (8) 1% (1) 0% (0)
Dryness of vagina

(n = 108)
89% (96) 9% (10) 2% (2) 0% (0)
Weight gain

(n = 124)
12% (15) 40% (50) 30% (37) 18% (22)

Results reported as: total percentage of participants reporting score (n).

Fig 1. Perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on training in pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal participants (n = 183).

Fig 1

Fig 2. Perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on performance in pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal participants (n = 183).

Fig 2

Fig 3. Reported general health in pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal participants (n = 182).

Fig 3

There was a significant effect of menopausal group on age (p < .001, Table 4), with postmenopausal participants significantly older than premenopausal participants (p < .001) and perimenopausal participants (p < .001), and perimenopausal participants significantly older than premenopausal participants (p = .011). There was also a significant effect of menopausal group on total MRS score (p < .001, Table 4). Pairwise comparisons show that total MRS score is significantly higher in perimenopausal females compared to premenopausal females (p < .001) and postmenopausal participants (p = .009), and total MRS score was greater for postmenopausal participants compared to premenopausal participants (p = .005). Total MRS scores were significantly different across participants reporting no negative effect, slight negative effect, moderate negative effect, and strong negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training (p < .001) and performance (p < .001), suggesting that a higher reported severity of menopausal symptoms has a greater perceived negative effect on training and performance (Table 5). Pairwise comparisons show that total MRS score is significantly higher among participants reporting a strong negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training compared to those reporting a slight negative effect (p = .001) and those reporting no negative effect of symptoms on training (p < .001), and higher among participants reporting a moderate negative effect of symptoms on training compared to those reporting a slight negative effect (p = .007) and no negative effect of symptoms on training (p < .001). Pairwise comparisons also show that total MRS score is significantly higher among participants reporting a strong negative effect of symptoms on performance compared to those reporting a slight negative effect (p = .001) and those reporting no negative effect of symptoms on performance (p < .001), and higher among participants reporting a moderate negative effect of symptoms on performance compared to those reporting no negative effect of symptoms on performance (p = .001).

Table 4. Age and total Menopausal Rating Scale scores across participants.

Participant Characteristics Premenopausal

(n = 34)
Perimenopausal

(n = 73)
Postmenopausal

(n = 80)
All participants

(n = 187)
p
Age (years) 44.4 ± 3.2 47.4 ± 3.7 55.2 ± 4.2 50.2 ± 5.9 <.001*
Total MRS score 8.0 ± 4.7 14.2 ± 6.0 11.7 ± 6.1 12.0 ± 6.2 <.001*

M ± SD = mean ± standard deviation.

*p < .05.

Table 5. Total Menopausal Rating Scale scores across perceived effect of menopausal symptoms on training and performance.

No negative effect Slight negative effect Moderate negative effect Strong negative effect p
Perceived effect of menopausal symptoms on training 8.5 ± 4.7 11.4 ± 4.3 15.1 ± 5.5 19.5 ± 7.8 <.001*
Perceived effect of menopausal symptoms on performance 8.8 ± 5.0 12.1 ± 4.7 14.1 ± 5.7 18.4 ± 7.0 <.001*

M ± SD = mean ± standard deviation

*p < .05

Discussion

This study examined the frequency of menopausal symptoms among female endurance athletes and found that although most of the participants reported their overall health as excellent to very good, menopausal symptoms were still prevalent in this population. The most common menopausal symptoms reported among participants were sleep problems and physical and mental exhaustion. The menopausal symptoms that had the greatest perceived negative effect on training and performance were joint and muscular discomfort, sleep problems, and physical and mental exhaustion. Participants reporting a greater perceived negative effect of symptoms on training and performance demonstrated greater severity of menopausal symptoms compared to those reporting no or lesser negative effects of menopausal symptoms on training and performance.

Our findings regarding rates of menopausal symptoms are generally consistent with those from general samples of females. Sleep disturbances and fatigue are common among menopausal females, affecting 40–72% of the menopausal female population [4,26,27]. In menopausal females, poor sleep can negatively affect cardiovascular health [28], mood [29,30], and quality of life [31]. Poor sleep is also likely interfering with participation in physical activity, as 49% of women from a general sample aged 40–65 years report “feeling too tired” as a barrier to participation in physical activity [32]. In two of the few studies investigating menopause among female athletes, Ussher et al. (2008) reported sleeplessness as one of the most frequently reported symptoms among menopausal master swimmers (47%) [17], and in a study including menopausal weightlifting athletes, Huebner et al. (2020) reported that the two most common symptoms were trouble sleeping (43%) and fatigue (34%) [33]. The very high frequency of sleep problems (88%) and exhaustion (83%) in our sample is particularly concerning because of the importance of sleep for both sport performance and prevention of injury in athletes [3436]. Although exercise is known to improve sleep in menopausal females [37], our results highlight the potential utility of interventions targeting improved sleep for menopausal female athletes who are already regularly participating in physical activity. Research supports cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness and relaxation, yoga, pharmacologic intervention, and nutritional intervention for improved sleep among menopausal females [29,3840], and sleep extension and sleep hygiene are recommended for improved sleep among athletes [4143]; however, these strategies require further investigation to assess their effectiveness specifically for female menopausal athletes.

In addition to sleep and physical and mental exhaustion, joint and muscular discomfort and weight gain had the strongest perceived negative effect on training and performance. One systematic review concluded that athletes with musculoskeletal injuries and subsequent pain had high levels of depressive symptoms, though most of the reviewed studies included younger athletes (ages 18–27 years) and only 21% of included participants were female [44]. The association between musculoskeletal pain and depression symptoms is notable because of the high frequency of self-reported depressive mood in our sample (67%) in response to the MRS. These musculoskeletal symptoms may have a compounding effect with the psychological symptoms, ultimately negatively affecting training and performance in menopausal athletes. Wright et al. (2024) recently introduced the terminology “musculoskeletal syndrome of menopause” to describe the constellation of factors affecting joint and muscle health during menopause (i.e., inflammation, decreased muscle mass and bone mineral density, and arthritis) [45]. Considering that approximately 71% of perimenopausal women have musculoskeletal pain [46], and in our study of athletes we found 63% reported musculoskeletal pain, it is imperative for rehabilitation clinicians and healthcare providers to be aware of this syndrome in order to effectively address this common condition among menopausal females.

Perimenopause is characterized by high variability in hormonal fluctuations compared to females in the reproductive phase [1]. Unsurprisingly, perimenopausal participants reported more severe menopausal symptoms compared to pre- and postmenopausal participants. Similarly, more peri- and postmenopausal participants reported that their menopausal symptoms had a moderate or strong negative effect on their training and performance compared to premenopausal participants, and across the entire sample, greater reported severity of menopausal symptoms predicted a greater perceived negative effect on training and performance. Total MRS scores in the peri- (14.2 ± 6.0) and postmenopausal (11.7 ± 6.1) participants are considered “moderate” severity of symptoms (total score range 9–15) [24]. Despite evidence in support of exercise for improving menopausal symptoms in the general female population [4750], reported MRS scores in our sample of highly physically active participants are similar to a range of total MRS scores reported in the general population [4,24,51]. Because of the positive benefits of physical activity in improving cardiovascular health [52], musculoskeletal health [9], and quality of life [8] in menopausal females, it is imperative to educate this population about the importance of continuing a practice of regular exercise. Unfortunately, in a survey of Strava app (exercise activity tracking application) users, only 11% of participants reported receiving advice regarding exercise during menopause [20]. Perimenopause is a crucial time for athlete education regarding common menopausal symptoms and interventions to address these symptoms in order to facilitate continued participation in physical activity.

Strengths of this study include minimum physical activity volume of participants to ensure a physically active sample. We also used a validated measure to assess and report a range of menopausal symptoms in our participants, allowing comparative analysis to other menopausal samples. Finally, this is one of the first studies to investigate menopausal symptoms among highly active menopausal females. Study limitations include the cross-sectional nature of this data collection, which prevents drawing conclusions about the causal associations between menopausal symptoms, training, and performance. Additionally, we did not collect demographic information (e.g., race/ethnicity, level of education, income), which makes it difficult to interpret the generalizability of these results to the broader population. Although menopausal status was self-reported, we provided menopausal status definitions that are consistent with the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop criteria [1]. Finally, there may have been other personal factors that are common in middle-aged females (e.g., work-related stress, caregiving responsibilities, other health conditions) contributing to the symptoms reported in our sample. We did not collect health history, so there may be underlying medical or psychological conditions contributing to these symptoms. The use of hormone replacement therapy, medications, and/or supplements can affect menopausal symptoms and may have influenced results. However, regardless of the multifaceted cause of these symptoms, the high frequency of reported symptoms should be addressed in this population. Future studies with strong research design and larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings and to determine the most effective interventions to address these symptoms.

In conclusion, despite evidence suggesting that exercise improves menopausal symptoms, frequency of menopausal symptoms among female endurance athletes is high and severity of menopausal symptoms is similar to that reported in the general population. Sleep problems and physical and mental exhaustion were the most common symptoms reported, and together with joint and muscular discomfort and weight gain had the greatest perceived negative effect on training and performance. Larger sample sizes with high quality research design are needed to confirm these findings. Healthcare providers and rehabilitation clinicians need to address these symptoms in this population to promote continued participation in physical activity.

Supporting information

S1 File. Female endurance athlete survey data.

(XLSX)

pone.0335738.s001.xlsx (34.3KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Heart, Blood, Lung Institute in the form of a grant awarded to N.M.Y. (K01 HL159348-01) and Old Dominion University in the form of a salary for N.M.Y. The specific roles of this author are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, Lobo R, Maki P, Rebar RW. Executive summary of the stages of reproductive aging workshop 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:1159–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.El Khoudary SR, Greendale G, Crawford SL, Avis NE, Brooks MM, Thurston RC, et al. The menopause transition and women’s health at midlife: a progress report from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause. 2019;26(10):1213–27. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shaver JL, Woods NF. Sleep and menopause: a narrative review. Menopause. 2015;22(8):899–915. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chedraui P, Aguirre W, Hidalgo L, Fayad L. Assessing menopausal symptoms among healthy middle aged women with the Menopause Rating Scale. Maturitas. 2007;57(3):271–8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mili N, Paschou SA, Armeni A, Georgopoulos N, Goulis DG, Lambrinoudaki I. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review on prevalence and treatment. Menopause. 2021;28(6):706–16. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Whiteley J, daCosta DiBonaventura M, Wagner J-S, Alvir J, Shah S. The impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life, productivity, and economic outcomes. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013;22(11):983–90. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.US Census Bur. Exploring Age Groups in the 2020 Census. https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/exploring-age-groups-in-the-2020-census.html [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mansikkamäki K, Raitanen J, Malila N, Sarkeala T, Männistö S, Fredman J, et al. Physical activity and menopause-related quality of life - a population-based cross-sectional study. Maturitas. 2015;80(1):69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sipilä S, Törmäkangas T, Sillanpää E, Aukee P, Kujala UM, Kovanen V, et al. Muscle and bone mass in middle-aged women: role of menopausal status and physical activity. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11(3):698–709. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Woolf K, Reese CE, Mason MP, Beaird LC, Tudor-Locke C, Vaughan LA. Physical activity is associated with risk factors for chronic disease across adult women’s life cycle. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(6):948–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Godoy-Izquierdo D, de Teresa C, Mendoza N. Exercise for peri- and postmenopausal women: Recommendations from synergistic alliances of women’s medicine and health psychology for the promotion of an active lifestyle. Maturitas. 2024;185:107924. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I-M, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vitti A, Nikolaidis PT, Villiger E, Onywera V, Knechtle B. The “New York City Marathon”: participation and performance trends of 1.2M runners during half-century. Res Sports Med. 2020;28(1):121–37. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2019.1586705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reusser M, Sousa CV, Villiger E, Alvero Cruz JR, Hill L, Rosemann T. Increased participation and decreased performance in recreational master athletes in “Berlin Marathon” 1974–2019. Front Physiol. 2021;12:631237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT, König S, Rosemann T, Rüst CA. Performance trends in master freestyle swimmers aged 25–89 years at the FINA World Championships from 1986 to 2014. AGE. 2016;38:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Unterweger CM, Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT, Rosemann T, Rüst CA. Increased participation and improved performance in age group backstroke master swimmers from 25–29 to 100–104 years at the FINA World Masters Championships from 1986 to 2014. SpringerPlus. 2016;5:645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Ussher M, Mount C, Greenberg S, Perz J. Perceived effects of menopause among women masters swimmers. Int J Aquat Res Educ. 2009;3:368–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Canário ACG, Cabral PU, Spyrides MH, Giraldo PC, Eleutério J Jr, Gonçalves AK. The impact of physical activity on menopausal symptoms in middle-aged women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(1):34–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dąbrowska-Galas M, Dąbrowska J, Ptaszkowski K, Plinta R. High Physical Activity Level May Reduce Menopausal Symptoms. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(8):466. doi: 10.3390/medicina55080466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carter E, Bruinvels G, Timmins K, Pedlar C, Martin D. Menopausal symptoms, exercise practices, and advice received in active women: a multi-country survey of strava app users. Women Health. 2024;64(1):23–31. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2023.2284730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bondarev D, Finni T, Kokko K, Kujala UM, Aukee P, Kovanen V, et al. Physical Performance During the Menopausal Transition and the Role of Physical Activity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(9):1587–90. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pettee Gabriel K, Sternfeld B, Colvin A, Stewart A, Strotmeyer ES, Cauley JA, et al. Physical activity trajectories during midlife and subsequent risk of physical functioning decline in late mid-life: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Prev Med. 2017;105:287–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang D, Jackson EA, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Elliott MR, Harlow SD, Hood MM, et al. Healthy Lifestyle During the Midlife Is Prospectively Associated With Less Subclinical Carotid Atherosclerosis: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(23):e010405. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heinemann K, Ruebig A, Potthoff P, Schneider HPG, Strelow F, Heinemann LAJ, et al. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) scale: a methodological review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:45. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15(5):625–32. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Khatoon A, Husain S, Husain S, Hussain S. An Overview of Menopausal Symptoms Using the Menopause Rating Scale in a Tertiary Care Center. J Midlife Health. 2018;9(3):150–4. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_31_18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maki PM, Panay N, Simon JA. Sleep disturbance associated with the menopause. Menopause. 2024;31(8):724–33. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Makarem N, St-Onge M-P, Liao M, Lloyd-Jones DM, Aggarwal B. Association of sleep characteristics with cardiovascular health among women and differences by race/ethnicity and menopausal status: findings from the American Heart Association Go Red for Women Strategically Focused Research Network. Sleep Health. 2019;5(5):501–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Baker FC, de Zambotti M, Colrain IM, Bei B. Sleep problems during the menopausal transition: prevalence, impact, and management challenges. Nat Sci Sleep. 2018;10:73–95. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S125807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cheng M-H, Hsu C-Y, Wang S-J, Lee S-J, Wang P-H, Fuh J-L. The relationship of self-reported sleep disturbance, mood, and menopause in a community study. Menopause. 2008;15(5):958–62. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318160dafa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Timur S, Sahin NH. Effects of sleep disturbance on the quality of life of Turkish menopausal women: a population-based study. Maturitas. 2009;64(3):177–81. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wasley D, Gailey S. Menopause and the role of physical activity - The views and knowledge of women aged 40-65. Post Reprod Health. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huebner M, Meltzer D, Ma W, Arrow H. The Masters athlete in Olympic weightlifting: Training, lifestyle, health challenges, and gender differences. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0243652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Roberts SSH, Teo W-P, Aisbett B, Warmington SA. Extended Sleep Maintains Endurance Performance Better than Normal or Restricted Sleep. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(12):2516–23. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lopes TR, Pereira HM, Bittencourt LRA, Silva BM. How much does sleep deprivation impair endurance performance? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci. 2023;23(7):1279–92. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2155583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Johnston R, Cahalan R, Bonnett L, Maguire M, Glasgow P, Madigan S, et al. General health complaints and sleep associated with new injury within an endurance sporting population: A prospective study. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(3):252–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Qian J, Sun S, Wang M, Sun Y, Sun X, Jevitt C, et al. The effect of exercise intervention on improving sleep in menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1092294. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1092294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lam CM, Hernandez-Galan L, Mbuagbaw L, Ewusie JE, Thabane L, Shea AK. Behavioral interventions for improving sleep outcomes in menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Menopause. 2022;29(10):1210–21. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Susanti HD, Sonko I, Chang P-C, Chuang Y-H, Chung M-H. Effects of yoga on menopausal symptoms and sleep quality across menopause statuses: A randomized controlled trial. Nurs Health Sci. 2022;24(2):368–79. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Polasek D, Santhi N, Alfonso-Miller P, Walshe IH, Haskell-Ramsay CF, Elder GJ. Nutritional interventions in treating menopause-related sleep disturbances: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2024;82(8):1087–110. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bonnar D, Bartel K, Kakoschke N, Lang C. Sleep Interventions Designed to Improve Athletic Performance and Recovery: A Systematic Review of Current Approaches. Sports Med. 2018;48(3):683–703. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0832-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Simpson NS, Gibbs EL, Matheson GO. Optimizing sleep to maximize performance: implications and recommendations for elite athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(3):266–74. doi: 10.1111/sms.12703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gwyther K, Rice S, Purcell R, Pilkington V, Santesteban-Echarri O, Bailey A, et al. Sleep interventions for performance, mood and sleep outcomes in athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2022;58:102094. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102094 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marconcin P, Silva AL, Flôres F, Nunes A, Lourenço JF, Peralta M, et al. Association between Musculoskeletal Injuries and Depressive Symptoms among Athletes: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(12):6130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wright VJ, Schwartzman JD, Itinoche R, Wittstein J. The musculoskeletal syndrome of menopause. Climacteric. 2024;27(5):466–72. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2024.2380363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lu C-B, Liu P-F, Zhou Y-S, Meng F-C, Qiao T-Y, Yang X-J, et al. Musculoskeletal Pain during the Menopausal Transition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neural Plast. 2020;2020:8842110. doi: 10.1155/2020/8842110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Daley AJ, Stokes-Lampard HJ, Macarthur C. Exercise to reduce vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms: a review. Maturitas. 2009;63(3):176–80. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kim M-J, Cho J, Ahn Y, Yim G, Park H-Y. Association between physical activity and menopausal symptoms in perimenopausal women. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Skrzypulec V, Dabrowska J, Drosdzol A. The influence of physical activity level on climacteric symptoms in menopausal women. Climacteric. 2010;13(4):355–61. doi: 10.3109/13697131003597019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yue H, Yang Y, Xie F, Cui J, Li Y, Si M, et al. Effects of physical activity on depressive and anxiety symptoms of women in the menopausal transition and menopause: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01712-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tao M, Shao H, Li C, Teng Y. Correlation between the modified Kupperman Index and the Menopause Rating Scale in Chinese women. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:223–9. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S42852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Colpani V, Oppermann K, Spritzer PM. Association between habitual physical activity and lower cardiovascular risk in premenopausal, perimenopausal, and postmenopausal women: a population-based study. Menopause. 2013;20(5):525–31. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e318271b388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Luiz F Baccaro

1 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Hamilton,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 15 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Luiz F. Baccaro

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements: 

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf .

2. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [Data is not publicly available because participants were not made aware in advance of the potential for individual data to be published. Interested researchers are welcome to contact the corresponding author, and reasonable requests for data will be considered on a case-by-case basis.]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The study was based on a survey study with designed question items.

It is inappropriate to use linear regression to study the association between total MRS score and perceived effect of symptoms. The outcome in here should not be regarded as a continuous variable with normal density as is usually assumed in linear regression models.

I don’t think the information generated from this study is very useful. Most results are based on summary statistics calculated for different menopausal symptoms. For example, you established the significance of age variable. But that is a well-known result documented in the medical literature.

The sample size is moderate.

Reviewer #2: The authors present a very interesting cross-sectional study with the aim of determining the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in female endurance athletes and examining the perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on the training and performance of this population. Some suggestions are made below.

In order to talk about the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in the study population, we need to know if the sample is representative of the total universe of these women in the United States. In the methodology, the authors need to provide an approximate number of American women who practice the physical activities considered in the methodology. Also, how did they arrive at the figure of 384 screening surveys presented in the results section? Is this the approximate number of American women who do these physical activities? Why didn't the authors ask if the research participants use any medication that improves menopause-related symptoms? Why was this not an exclusion criterion in this study?

In the results section, as the sample of women who responded to the survey does not seem to be representative of the female population who practice the physical activities considered in this study, it would be more correct to change the term prevalence to frequency, as this is a descriptive study and not a prevalence study.

There is no need to repeat the study's proposal at the beginning of the discussion, but I would urge the authors to rethink changing the term prevalence to frequency in the introduction and results. I suggest that the first paragraph of the discussion be limited to the text: “The most common menopausal symptoms reported among participants were sleep problems and physical and mental exhaustion. The menopausal symptoms that had the greatest perceived negative effect on training and performance were joint and muscular discomfort, sleep problems, and physical and mental exhaustion. Greater reported severity of menopausal symptoms was associated with a greater perceived negative effect of symptoms on training and performance.” Finally, there may have been other personal factors that are common in middle-aged females (e.g., work-related stress, caregiving responsibilities, other health conditions) contributing to the symptoms reported in our sample. We did not collect health history, so there may be underlying medical or psychological conditions contributing to these symptoms.”, the authors should add that if there was inclusion of women who use hormone replacement, antidepressants, herbal medicines and other supplements that can influence menopausal symptoms, this bias may have influenced the results.

Finally, the conclusion paragraph should state that the frequency of menopausal symptoms in the population that responded to the email was high, objectively complementing which symptoms were associated with a negative effect on training and performance. It should also include the prospect of new studies with a better design so that the results of this study can be confirmed with a better level of evidence.

Reviewer #3: The study rationale must also be better justified. Research that investigates the impact of physical activity during menopause in greater depth is both urgent and highly relevant, especially considering the increasing life expectancy of women, growing concern with quality of life, and global population aging.

Reviewer’s Comment-->-->The article addresses a highly relevant and globally significant topic, with recent scientific evidence highlighting physical activity as a key component in promoting health among menopausal women.-->--> -->-->The manuscript focuses on the prevalence of menopause and the most commonly reported symptoms experienced during this phase, contributing to the understanding of the clinical and psychosocial impact of the menopausal transition. However, the introduction is unclear and lacks coherence. It fails to adequately contextualize the topic or provide foundational background, such as citing established guidelines from the North American Menopause Society (NAMS) and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). These guidelines emphasize the importance of regular aerobic and resistance physical activity in alleviating menopausal symptoms, improving quality of life, and reducing morbidity and mortality associated with common comorbidities.-->--> -->-->Moreover, the introduction should include references that emphasize the relevance of the topic and identify existing gaps in the literature. For example, key conceptual definitions are only introduced later in the discussion section, which weakens the logical structure of the manuscript.-->--> -->-->The study rationale must also be better justified. Research that investigates the impact of physical activity during menopause in greater depth is both urgent and highly relevant, especially considering the increasing life expectancy of women, growing concern with quality of life, and global population aging.-->-->Materials and Methods-->-->Several methodological points need clarification:-->-->- Exclusion criteria are not specified.-->-->- Was surgical menopause considered in participant selection?-->-->- Regarding the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), it is recommended that the full 5-point Likert scale used in the study be described.-->-->- The handling of missing data is unclear. It should be stated whether participants were required to complete all questions for the questionnaire to be considered valid.-->-->Results-->-->This section requires several improvements for clearer and more effective presentation of the data:-->-->- The statement “Prevalence of menopausal symptoms among female endurance athletes is high” must be clarified or rewritten to reflect the data accurately.-->-->- Figures and tables present overlapping information. Therefore:-->-->  - Figure 1 and Table 1 convey the same content; I recommend removing Figure 1.-->-->  - Table 1 should present results stratified by menopausal status.-->-->  - Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 should be removed, as their data are already included in Table 2.-->-->  - Table 2 requires improvement to enhance clarity and interpretability.-->-->  - In the paragraph stating “Several menopausal symptoms were reported to negatively affect training”, I recommend summarizing only the key findings, as the detailed information is already well presented in the accompanying table.-->--> -->-->Discussion -->-->The discussion is overly long and lacks comparative analysis with findings from other studies involving menopausal women. -->-->While the authors provide a detailed account of the study's limitations, the manuscript would benefit from a more balanced perspective by also highlighting the strengths of the study. This would enhance the critical value and credibility of the discussion and contribute to the interpretation of the findings in a broader scientific context.-->?>

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Ricardo Ney Cobucci

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review.docx

pone.0335738.s002.docx (26.8KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2025 Dec 17;20(12):e0335738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335738.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


12 Sep 2025

Author Responses to Reviewer Comments

The authors thank the reviewers for their thoughtful review and helpful suggestions. In the document below we have included the comments individually followed by the authors’ responses to the comments. Requested changes to the manuscript have been saved as track changes, and line numbers in our responses below refer to the track changes version of the manuscript.

Reviewer #1:

1. The study was based on a survey study with designed question items.

It is inappropriate to use linear regression to study the association between total MRS score and perceived effect of symptoms. The outcome in here should not be regarded as a continuous variable with normal density as is usually assumed in linear regression models.

Author response: Thank you for this suggestion. We removed the linear regression analysis and instead used Kruskal-Wallis tests to evaluate differences in total MRS scores across groups reporting effects of menopausal symptoms on training and performance (no negative effect, slight negative effect, moderate negative effect, and strong negative effect of symptoms on training/performance). This analysis was included in the abstract, methods, results, and discussion sections, and a table (Table 5) was added to demonstrate mean and standard deviations of total MRS scores across these groups. The overall interpretation of these results is similar, in that participants with a greater perceived negative effect of symptoms demonstrate greater severity of menopausal symptoms compared to those reporting no / slight negative effect of menopausal symptoms on training and performance.

2. I don’t think the information generated from this study is very useful. Most results are based on summary statistics calculated for different menopausal symptoms. For example, you established the significance of age variable. But that is a well-known result documented in the medical literature.

Author response: We agree that this study replicated some established findings in the literature. However, very few studies have investigated menopausal symptoms among an athletic population, and this was the primary purpose of our study. The high frequency of menopausal symptoms in our sample draws attention to the need to screen for and address menopausal symptoms among highly active women to support continued participation in physical activity. To address this comment, in the revised manuscript we have provided additional information about what our study adds to the existing literature at the end of the introduction section.

3. The sample size is moderate.

Author response: We agree with the reviewer that the sample size is moderate. However, as noted above, we believe this study adds to the very small literature on menopausal female athletes and thus, contributes to this growing field. In addition, we have added a note in the limitations section that future research with larger samples is needed.

Reviewer #2:

1. The authors present a very interesting cross-sectional study with the aim of determining the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in female endurance athletes and examining the perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on the training and performance of this population. Some suggestions are made below.

Author response: Thank you for this positive feedback on our manuscript and for the suggestions on ways to improve. We have addressed each below.

2. In order to talk about the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in the study population, we need to know if the sample is representative of the total universe of these women in the United States. In the methodology, the authors need to provide an approximate number of American women who practice the physical activities considered in the methodology. Also, how did they arrive at the figure of 384 screening surveys presented in the results section? Is this the approximate number of American women who do these physical activities? Why didn't the authors ask if the research participants use any medication that improves menopause-related symptoms?

Why was this not an exclusion criterion in this study?

Author response: We have changed “prevalence” to “frequency” throughout the manuscript (including the title) for clarity.

There were 384 screening surveys that were received and reviewed by the investigators. This was clarified in the Results: “Out of 384 completed screening surveys received…” (line 162).

While we did not exclude participants for using hormone therapy or any specific medications, we did ask participants whether they use hormone therapy or not. These details were added to the results: “Fifty-three participants (28%) reported current HRT use; most of these were perimenopausal (n = 22) or postmenopausal (n = 29)” (lines 168-169). We wanted these results to be generalizable to a heterogeneous menopausal population, regardless of medication use.

3. In the results section, as the sample of women who responded to the survey does not seem to be representative of the female population who practice the physical activities considered in this study, it would be more correct to change the term prevalence to frequency, as this is a descriptive study and not a prevalence study.

Author response: We have changed “prevalence” to “frequency” throughout the manuscript (including the title) for clarity.

4. There is no need to repeat the study's proposal at the beginning of the discussion, but I would urge the authors to rethink changing the term prevalence to frequency in the introduction and results. I suggest that the first paragraph of the discussion be limited to the text: “The most common menopausal symptoms reported among participants were sleep problems and physical and mental exhaustion. The menopausal symptoms that had the greatest perceived negative effect on training and performance were joint and muscular discomfort, sleep problems, and physical and mental exhaustion. Greater reported severity of menopausal symptoms was associated with a greater perceived negative effect of symptoms on training and performance.”

Author response: Thank you for this feedback. We have revised the first sentence of the discussion to remove repeating all of the study aims. This sentence now reads: “This study examined the frequency of menopausal symptoms among female endurance athletes and found that although most of the participants reported their overall health as excellent to very good, menopausal symptoms were still prevalent in this population” (lines 274-277).

5. “Finally, there may have been other personal factors that are common in middle-aged females (e.g., work-related stress, caregiving responsibilities, other health conditions) contributing to the symptoms reported in our sample. We did not collect health history, so there may be underlying medical or psychological conditions contributing to these symptoms.”, the authors should add that if there was inclusion of women who use hormone replacement, antidepressants, herbal medicines and other supplements that can influence menopausal symptoms, this bias may have influenced the results.

Author response: We appreciate this point, and as noted above in response to this reviewer, we did not exclude women who were using hormone therapy or medications to reduce menopausal symptoms in order to have a more representative sample of menopausal women. However, the point is well-taken that it is plausible that some women’s symptoms may have been affected by such medications. To address this concern, in addition to adding data regarding the number of women using these medications (see response above), a statement was added to the limitations about the use of interventions that could influence results: “The use of hormone replacement therapy, medications, and/or supplements can affect menopausal symptoms and may have influenced the results” (Lines 356-357).

6. Finally, the conclusion paragraph should state that the frequency of menopausal symptoms in the population that responded to the email was high, objectively complementing which symptoms were associated with a negative effect on training and performance. It should also include the prospect of new studies with a better design so that the results of this study can be confirmed with a better level of evidence.

Author response: The conclusion was rephrased to highlight that the most common symptoms were also the ones with the greatest perceived negative effect on training/performance: “Sleep problems and physical and mental exhaustion were the most common symptoms reported, and together with joint and muscular discomfort and weight gain had the greatest perceived negative effect on training and performance” (lines 364-368). A statement was added to the conclusion paragraph about needing larger sample sizes and high quality research design to confirm these findings (lines 368-369).

Reviewer #3:

1. The study rationale must also be better justified. Research that investigates the impact of physical activity during menopause in greater depth is both urgent and highly relevant, especially considering the increasing life expectancy of women, growing concern with quality of life, and global population aging.

Author response: We agree with the reviewer that research examining the impact of activity during menopause is an important topic to study. The introduction section was revised to provide greater depth of background information and current knowledge gaps to support our study rationale. In particular, we now say: “Considering increased life expectancy, this has significant population health and economic implications, with an estimated 73 million females either in menopausal transition or post-menopause in the United States” (lines 64-66).

Reviewer’s Comments

1. The article addresses a highly relevant and globally significant topic, with recent scientific evidence highlighting physical activity as a key component in promoting health among menopausal women.

The manuscript focuses on the prevalence of menopause and the most commonly reported symptoms experienced during this phase, contributing to the understanding of the clinical and psychosocial impact of the menopausal transition. However, the introduction is unclear and lacks coherence. It fails to adequately contextualize the topic or provide foundational background, such as citing established guidelines from the North American Menopause Society (NAMS) and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). These guidelines emphasize the importance of regular aerobic and resistance physical activity in alleviating menopausal symptoms, improving quality of life, and reducing morbidity and mortality associated with common comorbidities.

Moreover, the introduction should include references that emphasize the relevance of the topic and identify existing gaps in the literature. For example, key conceptual definitions are only introduced later in the discussion section, which weakens the logical structure of the manuscript.

The study rationale must also be better justified. Research that investigates the impact of physical activity during menopause in greater depth is both urgent and highly relevant, especially considering the increasing life expectancy of women, growing concern with quality of life, and global population aging.

Author response: Foundational background information about the importance of physical activity for menopausal females and established recommendations for exercise were included in the introduction to contextualize and highlight the importance of this topic. Specifically, we stated: “Physical activity combats the musculoskeletal changes associated with menopause, reduces the risk of chronic disease, and improves quality of life in menopausal females. Middle-aged females are encouraged to follow established recommendations for physical activity, including both aerobic exercise and resistance training for optimal health outcomes” (lines 69-72). We believe the improvements to the Introduction draw attention to the importance of physical activity during menopause and better justify our study rationale.

2. Materials and Methods

Several methodological points need clarification:

- Exclusion criteria are not specified.

- Was surgical menopause considered in participant selection?

- Regarding the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), it is recommended that the full 5-point Likert scale used in the study be described.

- The handling of missing data is unclear. It should be stated whether participants were required to complete all questions for the questionnaire to be considered valid.

Author response:

Exclusion criteria were added to the methods section, “Participants were excluded if they were male or if they did not meet minimum physical activity volume described in the inclusion criteria” (lines 111-112).

Surgical menopause was not considered in participant selection, but participants who reported being post-menopausal were asked if they had a natural or surgical menopause. These details were added to the methods section (lines 121-122) and the results section (lines 169-170).

The full 5-point Likert scale for the Menopausal Rating Scale was added to the methods (line 128).

A statement was added to indicate that participants were required to complete the menopausal status and Menopausal Rating Scale questions for the questionnaire to be considered valid to the methods section (lines 113-114).

3. Results

This section requires several improvements for clearer and more effective presentation of the data:

- The statement “Prevalence of menopausal symptoms among female endurance athletes is high” must be clarified or rewritten to reflect the data accurately.

- Figures and tables present overlapping information. Therefore:

- Figure 1 and Table 1 convey the same content; I recommend removing Figure 1.

- Table 1 should present results stratified by menopausal status.

- Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5 should be removed, as their data are already included in Table 2.

- Table 2 requires improvement to enhance clarity and interpretability.

- In the paragraph stating “Several menopausal symptoms were reported to negatively affect training”, I recommend summarizing only the key findings, as the detailed information is already well presented in the accompanying table.

Author response:

“Prevalence” was replaced with “frequency” throughout the manuscript in response to Reviewer 2’s comments.

Figures 1, 2, and 3 were removed as suggested to prevent overlapping information. Figures 4 and 5 were answers to the questions “In general, do you perceive that your menopausal symptoms have negatively affected your training” and “…negatively affected your performance,” and are thus separate from the information in the tables addressing individual menopausal symptoms. This was clarified in the results section (lines 207 - 211).

Table 1 was updated to present results stratified by menopausal status as suggested.

Table 2 was split into two new tables (now Table 2 – Perceived effect of menopausal symptoms on training, and Table 3 – Perceived effect of menopausal symptoms on performance), and these tables were modified to improve clarity.

The paragraph about perceived negative effects on training and performance was revised to summarize key findings to prevent repeating information from the table (lines 189-204).

4. Discussion

The discussion is overly long and lacks comparative analysis with findings from other studies involving menopausal women.

While the authors provide a detailed account of the study's limitations, the manuscript would benefit from a more balanced perspective by also highlighting the strengths of the study. This would enhance the critical value and credibility of the discussion and contribute to the interpretation of the findings in a broader scientific context.

Author response:

We describe how our results compare to rates reported of menopausal symptoms in both the general population (lines 286-288; 319-321), and where known, menopausal athletes (lines 292-297).

We also describe that the severity of menopausal symptoms in our sample is similar to those reported in the general population

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0335738.s004.docx (38.8KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Luiz F Baccaro

16 Oct 2025

Frequency and perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on training and performance in female endurance athletes

PONE-D-25-25663R1

Dear Dr. Hamilton,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Luiz F. Baccaro

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Reviewer #2: The authors met most of the reviewers' recommendations and the manuscript is in a position to be accepted.

Reviewer #3: I have reviewed the revised version of the manuscript entitled “Frequency and perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on training and performance in female endurance athletes.” The authors have addressed the previous comments thoroughly and substantially improved the quality and clarity of the paper.

The study provides valuable insights in the interaction between menopausal symptoms and athletic performance in endurance-trained women. The methodological approach is sound and the analyses are clearly presented. The discussion now provides a balanced interpretation of the findings within the existing scientific literature, and the conclusions are supported by the data.

The manuscript now meets the journal’s standards for publication. I therefore recommend acceptance for publication in its current form

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Ricardo Ney Cobucci

Reviewer #3: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Luiz F Baccaro

PONE-D-25-25663R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hamilton,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Luiz F. Baccaro

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Female endurance athlete survey data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0335738.s001.xlsx (34.3KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review.docx

    pone.0335738.s002.docx (26.8KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0335738.s004.docx (38.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES