TABLE 2.
FabB | FabB (F390V)
|
|
FabB (F390L)
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Free energy (kJ/mol) | RMS | Free energy (kJ/mol) | RMS | Free energy (kJ/mol) | RMS | ||
−14.15 | 0.74 | −9.86 | 1.26 | −13.79 | 0.77 | ||
−13.38 | 0.67 | −7.84 | 4.26 | −10.50 | 1.04 | ||
−13.17 | 0.45 | −7.22 | 1.30 | −10.34 | 0.63 | ||
−13.11 | 0.73 | −4.27 | 13.72 | −10.09 | 1.16 | ||
−12.96 | 0.89 | −4.11 | 14.07 | −9.79 | 1.04 | ||
−12.77 | 0.54 | −4.09 | 13.89 | −9.78 | 1.16 | ||
−12.66 | 0.55 | −4.07 | 13.90 | −9.06 | 0.74 | ||
−11.72 | 0.91 | −4.01 | 9.39 | −8.97 | 0.67 | ||
−11.35 | 0.51 | −4.01 | 9.39 | −8.31 | 0.65 | ||
−10.98 | 1.30 | −3.99 | 13.69 | −7.69 | 0.41 |
The top 10 scoring solutions are shown. RMS values are derived from differences between the coordinates of modeled TLM and the coordinates of TLM from the crystal structure of the FabB-TLM binary complex (32).