Abstract
The gut microbiome plays a key role in human health, influencing various biological processes and disease outcomes. The historical roots of probiotics are traced back to Nobel Laureate Élie Metchnikoff, who linked the longevity of Bulgarian villagers to their consumption of sour milk fermented by Lactobacilli. His pioneering work led to the global recognition of probiotics as beneficial supplements, now a multibillion-dollar industry. Modern probiotics have been extensively studied for their immunomodulatory effects. Limosilactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri), a widely used probiotic, has garnered significant attention for its systemic immune-regulatory properties, particularly in relation to autoimmunity and cancer. This review delves into the role of L. reuteri in modulating immune responses, with a focus on its impact on systemic diseases.
Keywords: Autoimmunity, cancer, immune system, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, probiotic, systemic disease
Introduction
Probiotics definition and historical background
The Nobel Laureate Ilya Ilyich (Élie) Metchnikoff, celebrated as the father of innate immunity for his discovery of phagocytosis, later earned another notable title: the “Father of Probiotics”.1 While studying the remarkable longevity of residents in a region of Bulgaria, Metchnikoff hypothesized that their advanced age was linked to their diet, particularly their consumption of sour milk.2 He advocated for daily consumption of milk fermented with lactic acid bacteria as a cornerstone of a long and healthy life. When Metchnikoff’s theory made headlines in Paris in 1899, it sparked a surge in demand for yogurt, popularizing probiotics to the masses. Today, these lactic acid bacteria, now termed “probiotic bacteria,” are among the most widely consumed dietary supplements globally.1 The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) define probiotics as “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host”.3 The probiotic industry has since evolved into a multibillion-dollar market,4 underscoring a need to investigate the impact of probiotics on human health.
Application value and potential of probiotics
Probiotics hold significant application value and potential in promoting human health and managing diseases. Probiotics have shown promise in preventing and treating gastrointestinal disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS),5 inflammatory bowel disease (IBD),6 and antibiotic-associated diarrhea.7 Beyond gut health, probiotics influence the immune system, reduce inflammation,8 and impact mental health via the gut-brain axis.9 Emerging evidence links probiotics to chronic conditions like obesity,10 diabetes,11 cardiovascular diseases,12 and cancer13 by modulating host-microbe interactions and enhancing immune responses. With over 1,000 clinical trials as of 2020, probiotics are highly of interest for therapeutic use.14
Limosilactobacillus reuteri as a model for studying probiotic-driven immunomodulation
To fully harness the potential of probiotics, it is critical to understand the role of specific commensals and the mechanisms they employ. Limosilactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) is one of the most frequently used and well-studied probiotics, with decades of research highlighting its immunomodulatory properties.15–18 Due to the co-evolution of L. reuteri with its hosts, there is significant genetic heterogeneity within L. reuteri populations and consequently many strain-specific and context-dependent effects that offer key insights into leveraging probiotics to shape human health.19,20
In this review, we will almost exclusively focus on the systemic immunoregulatory impact of L. reuteri during disease, especially in autoimmunity and cancer. We briefly discuss the impact of L. reuteri on mucosal immunity and gastrointestinal pathology to provide a foundation for exploring its broader systemic impacts on immunity, but this topic is addressed more in depth by others.4,15,21–23
Limosilactobacillus reuteri’s impact on its niche
A brief historical background
L. reuteri was first isolated by and named after German microbiologist Gerhard Reuter in 1962.24,25 Reuter discovered that L. reuteri was native to the human microbiome, with significant levels present within the small intestine and feces of healthy individuals. Controversial at the time, Reuter also found significant levels of Lactobacilli in both the stomach and duodenum, areas previously considered sterile sites of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT).26 L. reuteri is a Gram-positive, nonsporulating, facultative anaerobic species of Limosilactobacillus that can thrive in a wide variety of environments. L. reuteri’s persistence in the host can be partially attributable to its resilience to the low pH and bile salts of the GIT,27,28 especially in the small intestine – the main niche of L. reuteri.
Role of L. reuteri in maintaining intestinal barrier integrity
The intestinal mucosal barrier is a critical immune defense barrier where trillions of microbes and environmental antigens interact with host immune cells, making it a key site for maintaining immune homeostasis.29 Intestinal barrier defects can decrease immune tolerance to environmental antigens and allow for the spread of pathogenic bacteria (“leaky gut”).30 Disruption of the intestinal barrier is implicated in several disease states, especially autoimmune and inflammatory disorders.29,31–33 L. reuteri is involved in the development and differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), which modulate the immune system to protect immune homeostasis.34 Co-culture of L. reuteri D8 with intestinal organoids increased the proliferation of leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5) positive intestinal epithelial stem cells (ISCs) through activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, promoting the differentiation of antimicrobial peptide-secreting Paneth cells.22 L. reuteri can act defensively on the intestinal barrier, preventing the colonization of pathogenic bacteria by producing anti-microbial peptides or competing for resources. In vivo, the L. reuteri-mediated protection from Citrobacter rodentium infection was linked with an increase in Lgr5+ ISC proliferation and expansion of lysozyme+ Paneth cells.35 Furthermore, L. reuteri has been implicated in the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as butyrate, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands, both of which have been associated with improved intestinal barrier function.36–39 A study found that L. reuteri-mediated enhanced AhR agonism reduced fecal levels of lipocalin-2 and paracellular permeability. Notably, these changes were associated with decreased immunopathology in autoimmune prone nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice expressing DQ8, a celiac disease susceptibility gene,40 suggesting that the protection of intestinal barrier integrity may be one mechanism by which L. reuteri protects against the development of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.
In addition to its increase of physical barrier protections, L. reuteri demonstrates immunomodulatory properties that play a role in both fortifying tight junctions (TJs) in the intestinal barrier and regulating mucosal immune cell function. Administration of L. reuteri I5007 to newborn piglets led to an overall increase in the protein expression of claudin-1, occludin, and zonulin-1 in IECs.41 In vitro studies utilizing IPEC-J2 intestinal porcine enterocytes demonstrated that treatment with L. reuteri I5007 maintained intestinal barrier integrity.42 Treatment with L. reuteri I5007 supernatant was sufficient to reverse lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced increase of proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and decrease of TJ proteins.42
L. reuteri maintains intestinal immunological homeostasis in its niche
Several mechanisms of how L. reuteri maintains immunological tolerance to protect from intestinal inflammation have been reported (Table 1 and Figure 1). Many of the metabolites produced by L. reuteri to promote its survival and colonization also benefit the host by suppressing excessive inflammation and pathogenic bacteria. Exopolysaccharides (EPS) produced by L. reuteri strengthens its adhesion to IECs, protecting from colonization of pathogenic bacteria, such as E. coli .80 Additionally, EPS can suppress intestinal inflammation either directly through (i) the suppression of cytokine function, or (ii) the induction of forkhead box P3 (Foxp3)+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). EPS co-culture with IPEC-J2 epithelial cells significantly decreased the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-12p35.80 EPS derived from L. reuteri 100–23 also served to dampen inflammation by increasing the number of Treg cells in the spleen of rodents. Importantly, the ability of L. reuteri to enhance systemic Treg expansion depends on its production of EPS by fructosyl transferase.56 L. reuteri is also able to produce bile salt hydrolase (BSH), necessary for its survival in environments containing high levels of bile salts.81 In BSH mutant mice lacking two key BSH genes (BT_1259 and BT_2086), the number of colonic retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor gamma t (RORγt) positive Treg cells were significantly reduced due to a Treg intrinsic upregulation of the bile acid sensing vitamin D receptor (Vdr).82 As RORγt+ Tregs help maintain colonic homeostasis,83 BSH produced by L. reuteri and other commensals likely contribute to maintaining tolerance.82
Table 1.
Impact of L. reuteri colonization during homeostasis, autoimmunity, and cancer.
| Strain of L. Reuteri | Ref. | Species | Condition/ treatment |
Duration of treatment | Model | Pathology | In vivo effects | Effect on disease severity | Effects on gut microbiome | Mechanisms | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Trails | |||||||||||
| DSM 17,938/ATCC PTA 5289 | 43 | Human | Orally administered 2 tablets twice daily |
3 weeks | Healthy individuals | Homeostasis | No change in salivary secretory IgA or cytokine levels | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DSM 17,938/ATCC PTA 5289 | 44 | Human | Orally administered 1×10^9 CFU/tablet twice daily |
12 weeks | Healthy individuals | Homeostasis | Increased salivary IgA protein but no differences in cytokine levels | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC PTA 5289/ATCC 55,730 | 45 | Human | Orally administered 2×10^8 CFU/gum 10 minutes twice daily |
12 weeks | Healthy individuals | Homeostasis | Increased salivary IgA protein; S. mutans 10449 and S. sobrinus B13 specific antibodies | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RC14 | 46 | Human | Orally administered 10^3 CFU/mL 125 g yogurt daily |
30 days | IBD patients | Autoimmunity | Blood: Increased proportion of CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells in peripheral blood; Serum: Decreased percentage of IL-12 and TNF-α producing monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells; decreased IL-12 concentration |
Decrease | N/A | N/A | Given in combination with L. rhamnosus |
| ATCC 55,730 | 47 | Human | Rectal enema 10^10 CFU daily |
8 weeks | IBD patients | Autoimmunity | Increased IL-10 and decreased IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-8 expression levels in rectal mucosa | Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RC14 | 48 | Human | Orally administered 2×10^9 CFU total twice daily |
3 months | Patients with RA | Autoimmunity | Serum: Decreased levels of IL-1α, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, TNF-α and MCP1; Clinical: no clinical improvement but had functional/wellbeing improvements |
no clinical improvement | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PBS 072 |
49 | Human | Orally administered 1×10^9 CFU/tablet daily | 56 days | Individuals with AD | Autoimmunity | Improved skin smoothness, moisturization and self-perception; decreased inflammatory markers TNF-α, TARC and TSLP | Decrease | N/A | N/A | Given in combination with L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum |
| DSM 12,246 | 50,51 | Human | Orally administered 10^10 CFU dissolved in liquid twice daily |
6 weeks | Individuals with AD | Autoimmunity | Decreased severity of eczema by 4.5% with more pronounced effects in patients with high IgE levels; decreased small intestinal permeability | Decrease | N/A | N/A | Given in combination with L. rhamnosus 19070–2 |
| Animal Models | |||||||||||
| I5007 | 52 | Pig | Sows: 10^9 CFU/kg diet Piglets: oral gavage 5 mLs of 10^9 CFU/mL |
Sows: supplement diet for 28 days Piglets: oral gavage at birth |
Landrace-Yorkshire sows and piglets | Homeostasis | Sows: dietary supplementation increased lactate concentration in colostrum and TNF-α and IL-6 in cord blood serum Piglets: oral gavage decreased serum IL-6 in piglet |
N/A | Maternal dietary supplementation increased alpha diversity in meconium of piglets; increased Romboutsia, Lactobacillus, Blautia, Butyricicoccus and Ruminococcus Oral gavage increased alpha diversity and abundance in Clostridium, Blautia, Lactobacillus, and Ruminococus; decreased abundance of Escherichia/Shigella and Enterococcus families in fecal samples of piglets |
N/A | N/A |
| I5007 | 41 | Pig Cells |
Piglets: oral gavage 6 × 10^9 CFU Cells: 3 × 10^7 CFU/mL |
Piglets: 14 days Cells: 0–10 hours |
Landrace-Yorkshire piglets/ Intestinal porcine enterocyte (IPEC-J2) cell line |
Homeostasis | Increased abundance of claudin-1, occludin and ZO-1 proteins in the Ileum and of occludin and ZO-1 in jejunum | N/A | N/A | Increased expression of tight junction proteins such as claudin-1, occludin and ZO-1 protecting from gut permeability | N/A |
| I5007 | 42 | Pig Cells |
Piglets: oral gavage 1 × 10^10 CFU Cells: 3 × 10^7 CFU/mL |
Piglets: 20 days Cells: 3–12 hours |
Piglets Intestinal porcine enterocyte (IPEC-J2) cell line |
Homeostasis | Increased pBD2, pBD3, pBD114, pBD129 and PG1–5 | N/A | Increased Paraprevotellaceae and Sharpea | Increased mRNA expression of β-defensins (pBD2, pBD3, pBD114, pBD129 and PG1–5) which act as antimicrobial peptides | N/A |
| 22 | 53 | Chicken | Oral gavage 10^8 CFU | 7 days | Chickens | Homeostasis | Increased intestinal mRNA expression of Lrg5, Axin2 and Lrp5, activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and induced proliferation; inhibited Notch signaling pathway by decreased (although not significantly) DLL1, Notch1 and Hes1 expression and increased Muc2 expression | N/A | N/A | Induced intestinal proliferation by the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin (Lrg5, Lrp5 and Axin2) signaling pathway | N/A |
| PSC 102 |
54 | Rats Cells |
Rats: Oral gavage 10^9 CFU/mL Cells: 10^9 CFU/mL |
3 weeks 24 hours |
Cyclophosphamide-induced immune-suppress Sprague-Dawley rats murine macrophage Raw264.7 cell line |
Homeostasis | Increased neutrophil migration, phagocytosis, splenocyte proliferation and CD45RA+ T cells; upregulated IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12A, TNF-α and IFN-γ in serum | N/A | Increased intestinal microbiota richness, relative abundance of Prevotella and Oscillibacter and reduced Fusobacterium and Bacteroides | N/A | N/A |
| 222/1021 | 55 | Rats | Rats oral gavage 10^9 CFU daily |
4 weeks | Sprague-Dawley rats | Homeostasis | Increased fecal free sIgA in a vitamin A dependent manner | N/A | Increased gut microbiota diversity in small intestine | N/A | N/A |
| DSM 17,509 | 56 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^6 CFU g body wt −1 daily |
Once | Lactobacillus-free BALB/c mice | Homeostasis | Produced exopolysaccharide levan through FTF action; induced Foxp3+ Treg cell populations in spleen | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| L7(WU)/100–23 | 57 | Mice | Oral gavage 1×10^9 CFU/mL daily |
2 days | C57BL/6 GF or WT mice | Homeostasis | Produced derivatives from dietary tryptophan, such as ILA, that activated AhR and downregulated Thpok which reprogram CD4+ T cells into double positive intraepithelial lymphocytes (CD8aa+ CD4+ T cells) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MG 5462 |
58 | Mice | Via drinking water 1 × 10^9 CFU daily |
56 days | C57BL/6 WT mice | Homeostasis | Increased frequency of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+T and NK1.1+ cells, and TNF-α production | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC PTA 6475 | 59 | Mice | Oral gavage: 300uL 1×10^9 CFU/mL 3 times weekly Via drinking water: 1.5 × 10^8 CFU/mL |
4 weeks | Female BALB/c mice in an ovari-ectomized-induced bone loss model | Homeostasis | Decreased CD4+ T-lymphocytes |
N/A | Increased α-diversity; higher abundance of Clostridiales and lower abundance of Bacteroidales OTUs | N/A | N/A |
| No information provided | 60 | Mice | Oral gavage 6×10^7 CFU |
Once | C57BL/6 GF | Homeostasis | Translocation to liver; microbial adaptation from mucosal to luminal niches | N/A | N/A | lacS/greA/ccpA triple mutation of L. reuteri facilitates translocation to and persistence at systemic sites (e.g. liver) |
N/A |
| ATCC | 17 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^9 CFU daily |
4 days | C57BL/6 GF Tet2-/- and Tet2+/+; Hemato-poietic-specific Tet2-/- with AIH-like pathology or symptom free; CD8 T Cells specific Tet2-/- in conca-navalin A-induced hepatitis; CCL4-induced hepatic injury | Autoimmunity | Translocation to liver-induced AIH in CD8 T cell specific Tet2-/- mice via secretion of I3A; induced Tc1 cell differentiation by decreased sensitivity to exogenous IFN-γ; increased activation of STAT1 | Increase | Hematopoietic-specific Tet2-/- had increased microbial diversity including L. reuteri, L. johnsonii, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli compared to symptom free littermates | peg257 mutants modestly predominated in the feces | N/A |
| No information provided | 61 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^9 CFU |
Once | PWD/PhJ or C57BL/6 GF mice in MOG35–55/CFA EAE model | Autoimmunity | Produced tryptophan-derived metabolites and competed with host kynurenine pathway | Increase | N/A | L. reuteri tryptophan-derived metabolites activated the AhR and enhanced T cell production of IL-17 | N/A |
| DYNDL22M62 | 62 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^9 CFU daily |
3 weeks | C57BL/6 WT mice in DNFB AD model | Autoimmunity | Alleviated swelling in ear; reduced serum IgE, TSLP, and IL-4 levels; activated AhR via increased levels of indoleacetic acid and indole propionic acid levels in fecal samples | Decrease | Reduced Dubosiella and increased Romboutsia, Erysipelotrichaceae, Peptostrepto-coccaceae, Akkermensiaceae, Lactobacillaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae in gut | N/A | N/A |
| FN041/DSM 17,938 | 63 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^9 CFU daily | 10 days or 3 weeks |
BALB/C mice in MC903/ OVA-induced AD model |
Autoimmunity | Strain specific induction of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg proliferation in spleen; decreased plasma IL-4, and ear IL-33 and TSLP levels | Decrease | Increased abundance of Akkermansia, Limosilactobacillus, Faecalibacterium and Bifidobacterium levels in ileum | N/A | N/A |
| No information provided | 64 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^7 CFU daily |
7 or 18 days | FVB/N mice in L-NAME/salt hyper-tension model and C57BL/6 mice in MOG35–55/CFA EAE model | Autoimmunity | Reduced systolic and normalized diastolic blood pressure in hypertension model; reduced TH17 cells in spleen and spinal cord in EAE model | Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| H4/LMG18238 | 65 | Mice | Oral gavage amount not specified | Once | C57BL6/J WT, GF and transgenic 2D2 TCR mice in EAE model | Autoimmunity | Express UvrA, a protein that mimics the TCR-binding residues of MOG peptide fragment 40–48; Uvra can cross react and activate MOG-specific T cells and increase Ki67+CD4+ T cells, exacerbating symptoms | Increase | N/A | Express peptides (UvrA) that mimic the MOG-specific TCR signals | In combination with a Erysipelo-trichaceae strain increased pathogenicity of MOG-specific Th17 cells and induced demyelination |
| No information provided | 66 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^9 CFU | Once for GF and 3 weeks for other mice |
C57BL/6 WT, GF or TLR7.1 Tg mice in imiquimod cream (LR7 agonist) lupus model | Autoimmunity | Translocation to systemic sites resulted in type 1 immune response by increased plasmacytoid dendritic cells in spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes, and increased type 1 interferon signaling; growth inhibited by resistant starches and fermentation to SCFAs (e.g. butyrate) | Increase | Resistant starch suppressed intestinal L. reuteri abundance and translocation | Resistant starch exerts beneficial effects in lupus-prone hosts through suppression of L. reuteri which promotes interferon pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of human autoimmunity | N/A |
| DSM 17,938 | 67 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^7 CFU daily |
1 or 2 weeks | C57BL/6 WT or B.6Cg-Foxp3Sf/J mice (scurfy) in Fox3p+ Treg cell deficient autoimmunity model | Autoimmunity | Reduced IFN-y and IL-4 producing CD4+T cells in spleen and MLNs and levels of IFNy and IL-4 in plasma; metabolite inosine reduced TH1/TH2 populations via interaction with A2A receptor | Decrease | Restored Shannon α-diversity; increased relative abundance of the phylum Firmicutes and genera Lactobacillus and Oscillospira; decreased phylum Tenericutes and genera Bacteroides | N/A | N/A |
| CNCM-I5022/CNCM-I5429 | 40 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^9 CFU 6 times weekly |
3 weeks | NOD/DQ8 celiac disease susceptible murine model | Autoimmunity | Produced AhR ligands that modulated gluten immunopathology; decreased intraepithelial lymphocyte counts in low-tryptophan diet; improved villus-to-crypt ratio |
Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC PTA 6475 | 68 | Mice | Via drinking water 3.5 × 10^5 CFU daily |
1 or 10 months | CD-1 Swiss mice and MMTV-neu (HER2) FVB mice in mammary tumor model | Cancer | Increased in Foxp3+ Treg cells and IL-10 levels in lymph nodes; lowered levels of IL-17 in lymph tissue and serum; reduced mammary mast cells in a CD4+CD25+ Treg cell dependent manner; decreased nuclear NF-κB and c-Jun in neoplastic cells |
Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC PTA 6475 | 69 | Mice | Oral gavage 5 × 10^9 CFU daily prior to AOM injection and every 3 days after DSS treatment |
7 days then 15 weeks | Hdc-/- BALB/c in AOM/DSS CRC model | Cancer | Increased abundance of bacterial histidine decarboxylase mRNA and histamine in intestine; decreased KC, IL-22, IL-6, IL-1α, TNF in colonic mucosa; induced maturation of circulating immature CD11b+Gr-1+ myeloid cells | Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC PTA 6475/PRB94 | 70 | Mice | Oral gavage 0.2 mL of 2 × 10^9 CFU/mL | up to 35 days | C57BL/6J tamoxifen-regulated CDX2p-CreERT2 transgene targeting Apc/Tpr53 knockout and Kras G12D knock in human intestinal cancer lines (RKO, DLD1, HCT118 and SW480) and various other |
Cancer | Lowered grade and reduced invasive lesions; increased ROS species; decreased Ki67 cells and increased cCASP3 | Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC 23,272 | 71 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^8 CFU every other day or ILA (0.1 mg kg-1) |
4 weeks |
APCmin mice sponta-neous CRC model C57BL/6J colon organoid model human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cell line |
Cancer | Produced ILA via aromatic amino acid aminotransferase; downregulated IL17α expression and reduced CD4+IL-17A+ T cells; inhibited nuclear transcription factor (RORγt); activated AhR in epithelium and improved gut barrier integrity | Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MG5346 | 72 | Mice | Via drinking water heat-killed 10^9 CFU |
19 days | BALB/c nude mice human gastric cancer MKN1 cell line |
Cancer | anti-tumor effect; high cell cytotoxicity; induced mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis; increased expression levels of p-AKT, p53, Bax, cleaved caspase-9/3 and cPARP in tumor tissue | Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| No information provided | 73 | Mice | Oral gavage 2×10^8 CFU twice weekly |
3 weeks | C57BL/6 mice in a DEN/CCL4-induced HCC model | Cancer | produced acetate; inhibited IL-17A-producing ILC3s via Sox13 and reduced tumor burden | Decrease | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC BAA-2837 | 16 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^9 CFU Daily or I3A at 20 or 40 mg/kg intratumoral: 2 × 10^7 CFU 200ug/mL |
15–35 days | C57BL/6 mice in B16-F0 or YUMM1.7 melanoma, MC38 adeno-carcinoma, MMTV-PyMT breast cancer models serum samples of advanced melanoma patients |
Cancer | Intratumoral presences promoted antitumor Tc1 immunity, suppressed tumor growth and increased survival; produced I3A which was required and sufficient to enhance Tc1 differentiation that depended on AhR activation within CD8 T cells | Decrease | Reduced gut microbial diversity and enrichment of L. reuteri; translocation to tumor, liver, spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes not taxa specific | Dietary tryptophan was derived I3A promoted tumor suppression; high levels of sera I3A correlated with prolonged progression-free survival in human cancer patients, overall survival and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy response | N/A |
| #5529 refers to oligotype |
18 | Mice | N/A | N/A | C57BL/6 GF or hematopoietic-specific, intestinal specific and myeloid specific Tet2-/- mice in DSS colitis model | Cancer | Enriched in the jejunum of Tet2-/- mice; microbial cell wall components that bind to TLR2 sufficient to promote PMP independent of intestinal barrier dysfunction | Increase | N/A | Tlr2 agonist was sufficient to induce myeloid leukemia phenotype in an IL-6 dependent manner | N/A |
| In Vitro Models | |||||||||||
| MG5462MG4722MG5149 | 74 | Cells | 5 mg/mL cell free supernatant |
24 hours | Murine macro phage RAW 264.7 cell line |
Homeostasis | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DSM 17,938 | 75 | Cells | 5% cell-free supernatant in MRS broth | 24 hours | Retinoic acid- driven mucosal-like or monocyte derived dendritic cells from peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells of healthy donors |
Homeostasis | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC PTA 6475, 5289, ATCC 55,730, CF48-3A | 76 | Cells | Biofilm cultures: 5% v/v Bacteria: diluted 1:100 in MRS broth |
16 to 18 hours | Human mono-cytoid (THP-1) cell line | Homeostasis | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC PTA 6475 | 77 | Cells | Conditioned media with histamine: 5% v/v Bacteria: diluted at 1:50 in MRS broth |
16 to 18 hours | Human mono-cytoid (THP-1) cell line | Homeostasis | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bacterial histamine activated H2 receptor resulting in suppression of TNF production | N/A |
| PTA5_F13 | 39 | Cells | 10^7 CFU were added to each reactor daily |
8 days | Novel polyfermentor intestinal model chicken cecal fermentation model | Homeostasis | N/A | N/A | Enriched Clostridium innocuum ASV075, Lactobacillus ASV016, Monoglobus ASV067 and Faecalibacterium UBA1819 AASV045; Decreased Escherichia/Shigella; in combination with glycerol protects against Enterobacteriaceae growth | N/A | N/A |
| PTCC 1655 | 78 | Cells | 1:10, 1:100 or 1:100 ratio | 24–72 hours | Gastric adeno-carcinoma epithelial cell line (AGS) | Cancer | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATCC PTA 6475 | 79 | Cells | 10^9 cells mL-1 | up to 24 hours | Human myeloid leukemia-derived cells (KBM-5) and human embryonic kidney cells (A293) cell lines | Cancer | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Figure 1.

Role of Limosilactobacillus reuteri in the context of intestinal and immune homeostasis. During homeostasis, L. reuteri strengthens the intestinal barrier by increasing intestinal epithelial tight junction protein expression, producing antimicrobial peptides, binding to intestinal epithelial cells via exopolysaccharides, increasing maturation of lysozyme secreting Paneth cells and releasing immunomodulatory metabolites. Specifically, ILA downregulates Thpok, which then reprograms CD4+ T cells into double positive intraepithelial CD8αα+CD4+ T cells. Additionally, I3A enhances ILC3s and the production of IL-22, IL-10 and antimicrobial peptides. L. reuteri suppresses intestinal inflammation via secretion of secretory IgA, maintenance of RORgT+ regulatory T cells by producing bile acid hydrolase, induction of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, reduction of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β), and increase of IL-10-producing myeloid plasmacytoid dendritic cells. L. reuteri and other commensals can translocate to systemic sites and various organs including liver, spleen, and extraintestinal tumors during homeostasis or disease-state. The summarized characteristics of this figure should not be considered as common characteristics of this species but rather possible functions of the species in context of homeostasis and systemic diseases.
Legend: AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; BAH, bile acid hydrolase; DC, dendritic cell; EPS, exopolysaccharide; Foxp3, Forkhead box protein P3; I3A, indole-3-aldehyde; IL, interleukin; ILA, indole-3-lactic acid; ILC, innate lymphoid cell; ISC, intestinal stem cell; Lrg5, leucine-rich repeat containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5; RORgT, RAR-related orphan receptor gamma; sIgA, secretory immunoglobin A; Tet, tet methylcytosine dioxygenase; TH, T-helper; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; Treg, regulatory T cell.
In addition to EPS and BSH, L. reuteri releases several immunomodulatory metabolites, including reuterin, indole-derivates, adenosine, and histamine, which have been found to suppress intestinal inflammation.84 The metabolomes of L. reuteri can vary from strain to strain: L. reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 is mainly associated with histone production, and L. reuteri DSM 17938 and its derived strain L. reuteri BG-R46 are typically known to produce adenosine.85 These strain-specific differences in their metabolite production can impact the ability of L. reuteri to influence host immunity. The L. reuteri-derived tryptophan catabolite indole-3-lactic acid (ILA) induces an expansion of CD4+ CD8αα+ double-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes by activating the AhR and subsequently suppressing the transcription factor Thpok in CD4 T cells.57 Both L. reuteri-derived ILA and a tryptophan-enriched diet potently induced this regulatory mucosal cell population. Notably, this study provided a mechanism of how the interplay of a probiotic bacterium (L. reuteri) and diet (tryptophan) can reprogram mucosal CD4 T cell immunity to potentially protect from enteric pathology.57 Indole-3-aldehyde (I3A), another dietary tryptophan catabolite produced by L. reuteri, can enhance type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) and their production of IL-22, IL-10, and antimicrobial peptides that decrease intestinal inflammation.86 Many tryptophan catabolites direct their effects on immune cells through activation of AhR, a ubiquitous host cell transcription factor.87 Given the ubiquitous expression of AhR across immune cell types, tryptophan catabolites produced by L. reuteri effect a wide range of host immune cells, which is reviewed elsewhere.88 Histamine production by L. reuteri can directly suppress inflammation by dampening TNF production,77 or by driving myeloid plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs) to produce IL-10 instead of inflammatory cytokines upon LPS exposure.89 Secretory IgA (sIgA) serves as the first line of defense in protecting the intestinal epithelium from enteric toxins and pathogenic microorganisms.90–92 Although the mechanism is not fully revealed, studies show that L. reuteri stimulates sIgA production by expanding pre-germinal center (GC)-like and GC-like B cells in Peyer’s patches, potentially in a vitamin A-dependent manner.55,93 It has also been reported that L. reuteri can increase salivary IgA, but the evidence is contradictory and suggests an effect that is highly context- and strain-dependent.43–45 The differing conclusions may also be due to the quickly changing dynamics of the oral microbiome.
Exploring the interactions between L. reuteri and existing clinical treatments, and even other commensals, while not a focus of this review, are critical, especially as L. reuteri is commonly used as a probiotic and a therapeutic intervention in many different diseases. Research studies examining potential combinatorial treatments with L. reuteri have been increasing, especially in combating the side effects of more hazardous treatments. L. reuteri has been shown to protect against chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis94 and cisplatin-induced renal inflammation when used alongside Clostridium butyricum.95
L. reuteri translocates to systemic organs during homeostasis
While several mechanisms of how L. reuteri improves intestinal barrier integrity are described (see paragraph above), numerous reports highlight L. reuteri’s ability to translocate systemically. L. reuteri is detected in various body sites, including mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen, urinary tract, and liver during both homeostasis and disease.16–18,32,60,66,96 One explanation for migration is that L. reuteri can directly attach to IECs via their mucus-binding proteins (MUBs).97 MUBs are encoded by L. reuteri, but quantitative mucus adhesion can be strain-dependent, with mucus binding highly correlating with the presence of MUBs.97 Although the mechanisms of L. reuteri translocation have not been fully revealed, a recent study discovered that within-host evolution contributes to the acquisition of mutations in commensal bacteria such as Enterococcus gallinarum and L. reuteri that facilitate translocation to systemic sites during homeostasis.60 This study shows that despite the important observation that certain de-novo mutations facilitate the translocation of commensals such as L. reuteri, these mutations are not required for translocation to systemic sites. Additional studies by the Meisel lab16–18 (and M.M. unpublished observations) and others32,98,99 corroborate the phenomenon of bacterial translocation of commensals to systemic sites during homeostasis. However, whether homeostatic commensal translocation to systemic organs contributes to the maintenance of immune homeostasis or the susceptibility to diseases remains to be defined.
L. reuteri immunomodulation in the context of autoimmunity
The onset of autoimmune diseases is influenced by an interplay of a wide variety of factors, including genetics, environmental exposures, diet, and notably, the gut microbiota.100,101 L. reuteri exhibits a wide range of immunomodulatory functions in autoimmune disease, with studies indicating both protective and exacerbating roles for L. reuteri depending on disease model and context (Table 2 and Figure 2).
Table 2.
Impact of L. reuteri colonization during gastrointestinal pathologies and infections.
| Strain of L. Reuteri | PMID | Species | Condition/ treatment |
Duration of treatment | Model | Pathology | In vitro effects | In vivo effects | Effect on disease severity | Effects on gut microbiome | Mechanisms | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Trails | ||||||||||||
| NCIMB 30,242 | 114 | Human | Orally administered 3×10^9 CFU/tablet daily (wk 1) and up to 9 × 10^9 CFU/tablet twice daily (wk 2–4) |
4 weeks | Hypercholesterolemic individuals | Metabolic disorders | N/A | Increased circulating bile acid levels due to increased activation of FGF-19. | Decrease | Increased Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio | N/A | |
| DSM 17,648 | 115 | Human | Orally administered 4 tablets 5 × 10^9 CFU/tablet daily |
14 days | H. pylori-positive patients | Enteric infection | Co-aggregation between L. reuteri and H. pylori |
N/A | Decrease | Decreased H. pylori load |
N/A | |
| ATCC 55,730 | 116 | Human | Orally administered 4 tablets 10^8 CFU/tablet daily |
4 weeks | H. pylori-positive patients | Enteric infection | N/A | N/A | Decrease | Decreased H. pylori load by 70% |
N/A | |
| ATCC 55,730 | 117 | Human | Orally administered 2 tablets 10^8 CFU/tablet daily |
28 days | H. pylori-positive patients | Enteric infection | N/A | N/A | Decrease | Decreased H. pylori load | N/A | |
| No information provided |
118 | Human | Orally administered 10^8 CFU 3 times daily |
21 days | H. pylori-positive patients | Enteric infection | N/A | N/A | Decrease | Increased eradication rate of H. pylori in patients | N/A | Patients were in eradication therapy for first 7 days |
| DSM 17,938/ATCC PTA 6475 | 119 | Human | Orally administered 2×10^8 CFU 7 times daily |
28 days | H. pylori-positive patients | Enteric infection | N/A | N/A | Decrease | Increased eradication rate of H. pylori in patients by 12.2% | N/A | Patients were in PPI therapy the whole time |
| DSM 17,938/ATCC PTA 6475 | 120 | Human | Orally administered 2×10^8 CFU total daily |
96 days | H. pylori-positive patients | Enteric infection | N/A | N/A | Decrease | Increased eradication rate of H. pylori in patients by 9% |
N/A | Patients were in eradication treatment on days 29 to 35 |
| DSM 17,938/ATCC PTA 6475 | 121 | Human | Orally administered 2×10^8 CFU total daily |
4 weeks | H. pylori-positive patients | Enteric infection | N/A | N/A | Decrease | Increased eradication rate of H. pylori in patients receiving eradication treatment by 8.6% | N/A | Patients were in eradication therapy for first 14 days |
| DSM 17,938/ATCC PTA 6475 | 122 | Human | Orally administered 2×10^8 CFU/tablet twice daily |
14 days | H. pylori -positive patients | Enteric infection | N/A | N/A | Decrease | Increased eradication rate of H. pylori in patients receiving eradication treatment by 8% | N/A | Patients were in PPI therapy for 14 days |
| ATCC 55,730 | 123 | Human | Orally administered 10^8 CFU/tablet twice daily |
4 weeks | Individuals with AAD | Enteric infection | N/A | Reduced frequency of diarrhea by 42.2% | Decrease | N/A | N/A | |
| DSM 17,938 | 124 | Human | Orally administered 10^9 CFU daily |
During hospi talization |
Children with nosocomial diarrhea | Enteric infection | N/A | No impact of L. Reuteri administration observed | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| DSM 17,938 | 125 | Human | Orally administered 10^8 CFU daily |
During hospitalization | Children with nosocomial diarrhea | Enteric infection | N/A | No impact of L. Reuteri administration observed | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Animal Models | ||||||||||||
| 6475 | 126 | Mice | Oral gavage 5 × 10^9 CFU daily | 7 days | BALB/c, in TNBS colitis model | Intestinal inflammation |
N/A | Enhanced ability to convert L-histidine to histamine via hdcA; microbial derived histamine activated H2R; decreased relative amounts of intestinal mucosal Il6 and Tnfα | Decrease | N/A | Reduced colitis in a H2R-dependent manner | |
| 100–23 | 51 | Mice | Oral gavage or intravaginal administration 10^9 CFU |
Once | C57BL/6 WT, BALB/c SCID or C3H/Orl GF mice in antibiotic treated DSS colitis model with Candida albicans injection | Intestinal inflammation / infection |
N/A | Production of I3A-induced colonic AhR-dependent IL-22 secretion by NKp46+ NK cells and stomach mucosal ILC3s; restored antifungal resistance in GF mice | Decrease | N/A | Bacterial derived I3A-induced AhR-dependent IL-22 by NK and ILC3 cells | |
| R2LC | 59 | Mice | Oral gavage 10^8 CFU daily | 7 days | C57BL/6 WT or CX3CR1-GFP/+ in DSS colitis model | Intestinal inflammation | N/A | Increased CD3-CD19+B220+ B cell population in Peyer’s patches; promoted bacterial defense by downregulation of Sgpl1 and upregulation of Lass5; reduced levels of TNFα, CXCL1, IL6 and IL10; increased IgA production via the Tfh-PD-1 pathway |
Decrease | Preserved α-diversity; inhibited Erysipelo-trichaceae and Escherichia/ Shigella; promoted Bifido-bacteriaceae and Corio-bacteriaceae |
Increased IgA production via the Tfh-PD-1 pathway; increased B cells subset; protected against inflammation | |
| Lr 5454 | 93 | Mice | Oral gavage 5 × 10^8 CFU daily |
TNBS model: 6 days C. rodentium model: 14 days |
C57BL/6 WT or GF, and BALB/c WT mice in TNBS or C. rodentium colitis model |
Intestinal inflammation / infection |
N/A | Decreased colonic gene expression of Mip2, IL1β, IL6 and Tnfα; promoted differentiation of CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg cells triggering IL22 expression; increased intracellular IL-10 in CD4+ T cells; increased antimicrobial peptides gene expression of mbd2, Reg3β and Reg3γ in a NOD2-independent manner |
Decrease | N/A | Promoted differentiation of CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ Treg cells; increased intracellular cytokine IL-10 in CD4+T cells; increased B-defensin-2, Reg3γ and Reg3β gene expression in a NOD2-independent manner |
|
| Used purified stress protein GroEL | 127 | Mice | Intrarectal administration: 1ng of protein daily | 4 days | BALB/c mice in DSS colitis model Human PBMC macrophage isolate Ex-vivo human colon biopsy model |
Intestinal inflammation | In human macrophages, inhibited LPS-induced pSTAT1 and promoted STAT6 and c-Myc expression; decreased TNF-α, IL-1β and IFN-γ and increased IL-10; decreased p-STAT1, caspase 3 and ROS in human colon explants |
Reduced colitis symptoms and maintained higher number of intestinal crypts; reduced colon macrophages; increased IL-10 and IL-13 and decreased IFN-γ; may involve TLR4 and the non-canonical pathway | Decrease | N/A | Derived GroEL stress protein activated the production of IL-10 via TLR4, promoting M2-like macrophages, and inhibited development of M1-like macrophages | |
| D8 | 35 | Mice | Oral gavage: 10^8 CFU Organoid: 10^6 CFU |
Mice: 28 days Organoid: 48 hours |
C57BL/6 WT mice in C. rodentium colitis model Mouse intestinal organoid model |
Enteric infection | Increased intestinal epithelial proliferation partly via Wnt/β-catenin; increased mRNA expression of c-Myc, cyclin, Ki67, Wnt3 and Lrp5; induced R-Spondin expression | Decreased intestinal TNF and IL-1β; modulated overactivation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway; increased density of lysozyme+ Paneth cells; increased antimicrobial expression of Defa1, Defa6 and Lyz-1. | Decrease | N/A | Increased expression of Wnt3, Lrp5 which activated Wnt/B-catenin pathway; increased Ki67, c-Myc and cyclin which increased proliferation and epithelial repair | |
| FSCDJY33M3 FGSZY33L6 FCQHCL8L6 |
128 | Mice | Oral gavage: amount not specified | 14 days | C57/6N mice in alcohol-induced colitis model | Intestinal inflammation | N/A | Strain FSCDJY33M3 reduced mRNA levels of TNFα, Il6, IL1β and increased expression of Muc2, Occludin and Claudin-3 | Decrease | Induced differences in β-diversity; Increased abundance of Verruco-microbia and Eubacterium ruminatium; decreased Patesci-bacteria |
N/A | |
| DSM 17,938 | 94 | Mice | Oral gavage: 10^6 CFU x g body wt −1 daily | 5 days | C57BL/6 WT and B6/129-TLR2tm1kir/J TLR2-/- mice in cold exposure and hypoxia necrotizing enterocolitis model |
Intestinal inflammation | N/A | Reduced colitis by 27%, increased percentage of CD44+CD4+ T cells; increased CD4+Fox3p+ Treg cells and CD103+ DCs via expression of CD80 and CD86; and decreased IL-1β and IFN-γ in ileal in WT not in TLR2-/- | Decrease | N/A | Regulated inflammation in a TLR2-dependent manner by activation of mucosal tolerogenic DCs which prime T cells into Tregs and reduced levels of IL-1β and IFN-γ in WT mice |
|
| Post-biotics derived from L. reuteri | 129 | Mice | Oral gavage 30, 60 or 90 mg ml-1 |
23 days | C57BL/6J WT mice in alcohol-induced liver injury (NIAAA) model | Hepatic injury |
N/A | Regulated intestinal FXR activated by bile acids; modulated FXR/SHP/SREBP-1c (potentially) ameliorating hepatic steatosis |
Decrease | N/A | N/A | |
| In Vitro Models | ||||||||||||
| Exopolysaccharide from L26 | 130 | Cells | 100 ug/mL | 4 hours | Enterotoxigenic E. coli-infected intestinal porcine enterocytes IPEC-J2 or monocyte-derived dendritic cell from healthy pigs | Enteric infection | Downregulated mRNA levels of IL-8, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-12p35, TLR4, TLR5 and MyD88 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| L26 (CCM 8616) Exopolysaccharide |
43 | Cells | Bacteria: multiplicity of infection 50:1 (bacteria: epithelial cell) Exopolysaccharide: 0.1 mg/mL |
4 or 5 hours | Intestinal porcine enterocytes IPEC-J2 infected with Salmonella Typhimurium |
Enteric infection | Increased mRNA levels of IL-8 without infection and decreased levels with infection; decreased IL-6; increased TNF-α and TGF-β |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Exopoly Saccha ride from DSM 17,938 L26 |
131 | Cells | 10% v/v in MRS broth resulted in 5 g/L and 4.3 g/L | 16 hours | Intestinal porcine epithelial (IPEC-1) cell line infected with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli | Enteric infection | Increased expression of IL-1β by linear polysaccharide and upregulated mRNA levels of NF-κB, IL-6 and TNF-α; inhibited E. coli adhesion and decreased IL-1β and IL-6 | N/A | N/A | Inhibited adhesion of entero toxigenic E. coli to IPEC-1 Cells |
N/A | |
Figure 2.

Role of Limosilactobacillus reuteri in the context of autoimmunity and cancer. L. reuteri is associated with both a protective and aggravating role in disease pathology. Strain-specific L. reuteri express MOG-cross reactive peptides which increase IL-17A cytokines and IFN-γ. Administration of L. reuteri, or its metabolites such as inosine, IAA or I3A, increases IL-17A producing TH17 cells, decreases TH1/TH2 population via interaction with the A24 receptor, and decreases serum Ig3. Depending on the cancer type, L. reuteri modulates cancer pathogenesis by increasing maturation of CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells or via TLR2-IL6 pathway promoting a myeloid leukemia phenotype. L. reuteri-derived metabolites influence disease progression. Specifically, I3A enhances Tc1 immunity via AhR activation in autoimmune and cancer disease models. Acetate, a short chain fatty acid, reduces IL-17A hepatic ILC3s through histone deacetylase inhibition. Diets supplemented with resistant starches decrease the proinflammatory effects of L. reuteri in autoimmune pathologies, decrease bacterial translocation, and reduce splenomegaly and accumulation of dendritic cells in spleen and Peyer’s patch. The summarized characteristics of this figure should not be considered as common characteristics of this species but rather possible functions of the species in context of homeostasis and systemic diseases.
Legend: A24, adenosine receptor 24; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; CREB, cyclic AMP response element binding protein; DC; dendritic cell; I3A, indole-3-aldehyde; I3G, indol-3-ylmethyl glucosinolate; IAA, Indole-3-acetic acid; IEC, intestinal epithelial cell; IgE, immunoglobin E; IL, interleukin; ILA, indole-3-lactic acid; ILC, innate lymphoid cell; INFy, Interferon gamma; ISC, intestinal stem cell; GzmB, Granzyme B; Lrg5, leucine-rich repeat containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5; MOG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; SAA, serum amyloid A; SCFA, short chain fatty acid; sIgA, secretory immunoglobin A; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; Tc1, cytotoxic type 1; Tet, tet methylcytosine dioxygenase; TH, T-helper; T-TLR2, Toll-like receptor 2; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; Treg, regulatory T cell.
Multiple sclerosis
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic T cell-mediated, progressive, neurodegenerative autoimmune disease. By performing shallow metagenomic sequencing, the international Multiple Sclerosis Microbiome Study (iMSMS) uncovered that MS patients display significant changes in fecal gut microbiome taxonomy and metabolic function when compared to healthy household controls.101 The role of L. reuteri in driving MS etiopathogenesis, however, is still uncertain. Many studies investigating the role of L. reuteri in MS disease models have conflicting results, making it difficult to classify L. reuteri as a symbiont or pathobiont in MS.
Protective effect of L. reuteri in MS-like disease
One report showed that L. reuteri DSM 17,938 ameliorated the development of murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a widely used animal model of MS, which is primarily mediated by T helper 17 (Th17) and Th1 cells.102 L. reuteri administration in this model significantly changed both the fecal microbiota alpha- and beta-diversity of mice developing EAE.102 L. reuteri administration reversed the EAE onset-induced changes to the microbiome, reducing the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and restoring the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Deferribacteres. Furthermore, an unbiased machine learning approach using genus-level relative abundance data uncovered that an operational taxonomic unit (OTU) matched to L. reuteri was the only effective OTU that distinguished control mice from mice susceptible to EAE.102 This suggests that L. reuteri may be an important driver in mediating protection from EAE. Indeed, upon L. reuteri administration, mice exhibited improved clinical EAE scoring and a decrease of Th17 and Th1 cells and their produced cytokines, IL-17A and interferon-γ (IFN-γ). Furthermore, L. reuteri significantly lowered CD3+ T cell and CD68+ macrophage infiltration into the spinal cord.102
Emerging research is etching out a key role for diet in commensal immunomodulation, as diet is critical in defining the metabolic repertoire of the microbiota.103,104 A key metabolic feature of L. reuteri is its ability to catabolize dietary tryptophan into immunomodulatory AhR ligands.86 A study discerning a role for L. reuteri in EAE suggests that L. reuteri-derived tryptophan catabolites may play a beneficial role in EAE.64 FVB/N mice fed a high salt diet (HSD) had a lower relative abundance of Limosilactobacillus as early as one day after diet administration and a significant reduction of total metabolite counts as determined by gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry, demonstrating the potent consequences of dietary interventions on the gut microbiota. Mice on a HSD displayed more severe pathogenesis as determined by clinical scoring, as well as significantly reduced fecal levels of the tryptophan catabolites ILA and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). L. reuteri administration was able to reverse the HSD-induced effects, significantly lowering clinical scoring and the number of Th17 cells in the spleens and spinal cords of EAE mice. Suggestive of a role for L. reuteri metabolites in regulating Th17 immune response in EAE, ILA co-cultured with naïve CD4 T cells significantly reduced the percentage of IL-17A producing cells that developed under Th17-polarizing conditions in a dose-dependent manner. A small clinical pilot study also indicated that these results may be clinically translatable. Healthy volunteers ingesting 6 g of extra sodium chloride daily for 14 days saw a decrease in Lactobacilli abundance and an increased percentage of proinflammatory IL-17A and TNF-α producing CD4+ T cells in the peripheral blood.64
L. reuteri aggravates MS-like pathology
Contrary to the previously mentioned study signifying a role for IAA in EAE suppression, another study found that in a different dietary context, L. reuteri-derived tryptophan catabolites can exacerbate inflammation in an EAE model.61 A diet high in tryptophan given to L. reuteri-colonized mice increased CD4+ IL-17A and IFN-γ producing cells and CD8+ T cells. L. reuteri isolates were enriched for high affinity classes of tryptophan catabolizing enzyme aromatic amino acid aminotransferase (ArAT). Unlike other Limosilactobacillus genomes, only L. reuteri isolates encoded aliphatic amidase E (AmiE), an enzyme that converts indole-3-acetamide into IAA. When L. reuteri was cultured in brain-heart infusion media supplemented with tryptophan, L. reuteri was able to increase concentrations of IAA, indole-3-lactate, tryptamine, indole-3-glyoxylic acid (I3G), and I3A. Metabolomics of serum from L. reuteri-colonized mice and L. reuteri monocultures revealed an increased presence of known and novel tryptophan-derived AhR ligands, including IAA, indole-3-glyoxylic acid, tryptamine, p-cresol, and diverse imidazole derivatives. Two of these metabolites, IAA and I3G, were able to expand CD4+ T cell populations in splenocyte cultures in vitro and enhance their IL-17A production in an AhR-dependent manner. Remarkably, mice on the diet low in tryptophan had significantly lower clinical scores, almost to the extent of complete disease prevention.61
Understanding the strain-specific effects of probiotics is critical for effective modulation of health outcomes.4 A study highlighted L. reuteri’s strain-specific effect in EAE etiopathogenesis by showing that one OTU, corresponding to L. reuteri strains H4 and LMG 18,238, activated autoreactive myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) T cells thereby promoting EAE pathology.65 The authors observed that induction of EAE triggers an expansion of MOG-specific CD4+ T cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine that produce large amounts of proinflammatory IFN-γ and IL-17A cytokines. Shotgun sequencing of small intestinal contents for mimicry peptides with sequences that matched MOG40–48, the TCR binding region for MOG, revealed that more than half of the candidate mimicry peptides found were Limosilactobacillus-derived. Three of these mimicry peptides were found to be specific to L. reuteri strains H4 and LMG 18,238, including UvrA. Albeit weakly, UvrA co-culture was able to increase activation levels of MOG33–55 specific 2D2 CD4+ T cells, demonstrated by increased expression of Ki67 and CD44.65 This study puts forward the notion that some, but not all, L. reuteri strains are pathogenic in EAE and further highlights the importance to mechanistically interrogate the strain-specific effects of L. reuteri in the context of MS.
Additionally, one study suggests that while L. reuteri alone could not worsen EAE clinical scoring, L. reuteri and an OTU matching Allobaculum stercoricanis DSM 13,633 can work synergistically to worsen EAE disease. Especially given that many probiotic regimens contain several commensals in addition to L. reuteri, the interactions between the L. reuteri and other bacteria species are an important avenue of investigation in the future.
Taken together, the differing conclusions of the effect of L. reuteri on EAE etiopathogenesis may be (i) strain-specific, (ii) disease-model-specific, or (iii) driven by diet-dependent changes to L. reuteri’s environment and metabolomic profile.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic-progressing, multi-organ autoinflammatory disease. While not species-specific to L. reuteri, Lactobacilli have been found to be enriched in feces of patients with SLE.66 Translocation of commensal bacteria can enhance systemic immune cell activation and thus worsen or even trigger autoimmunity in genetically susceptible individuals.32,98,105 This is especially clear in examining the effect of a resistant starch (RS) supplemented diet on the effects of L. reuteri in a mouse model of SLE-like disease. L. reuteri translocated to the mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, and spleens of TLR7.1 transgenic (Tg) mice.66 L. reuteri gavage in these mice led to splenomegaly, plasmacytoid dendritic cell (DC) accumulation in the spleen and in Peyer’s patches, and increased leukocyte recruitment to the kidneys. In wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice treated with imiquimod, L. reuteri worsened anemia and elevated gut permeability. Interestingly, the administration of a RS diet decreased L. reuteri abundance and translocation, likely due to improvement of the gut epithelial integrity as demonstrated by increased expression of markers such as Muc2 and Reg3γ. Both, WT C57BL/6 mice treated with imiquimod and TLR7.1 Tg mice fed with RS had reduced organomegaly, systemic type I IFN, and lowered frequencies of splenic pDCs, Th17 cells, neutrophils, and activated CD44+ T cells. However, L. johnsonii was also able to translocate to gut-distal sites but did not significantly worsen SLE-like disease, suggesting that there is an additional mechanism beyond translocation that is inhibited by a RS diet, such as the production of a metabolite.66 Despite the differing disease model, obese WT mice fed a high fat, resistant starch diet (HF-RS) decreased cecal IL-17A concentration and increased ileal Reg3γ and cecal occludin, supporting findings of Zegarra-Ruiz et al.66 that a RS diet may strengthen barrier function in autoimmune-prone mice.106 In a separate study, overexpression of Reg3γ was found to decrease the number of mucosa-associated bacteria (such as L. reuteri) and reduce the instance of bacterial translocation, consequently protecting mice against liver inflammation in an alcohol-induced steatohepatitis model.107
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an autoinflammatory liver disorder that often becomes refractory to immunosuppressants – the only therapeutic option for AIH patients – and progresses to end-stage liver disease in the absence of treatment.108 Despite previous work suggesting genetic and environmental factors play a role in AIH development,109 mechanisms underlying disease initiation remain enigmatic due to the lack of suitable murine models. Microbiota dysbiosis is observed in human AIH patients and a requirement of the microbiota for the development of experimental AIH is observed.110 However, the mechanisms of how the microbiota impacts on AIH pathogenesis remains poorly understood. We recently described a novel model of AIH-like disease that displays key features of human AIH.17 Using this novel AIH-like disease model, we showed that lack of hematopoietic Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (Tet2ΔVAV), an epigenetic regulator associated with autoimmunity, results in the development of microbiota-dependent AIH-like pathology, accompanied by hepatic enrichment of AhR ligand-producing pathobionts and Tc1 cell immunity.17 Tet2ΔVAV mice displayed a significant change in liver microbiome composition when compared to littermate controls and symptom free Tet2ΔVAV mice, characterized by an expansion of AhR ligand producing commensals such as L. reuteri and an increased AhR metabolism17. Oral gavage of L. reuteri was sufficient to trigger AIH-like disease in Tet2ΔVAV mice, profiled by an increase in hepatic AhR activity, hepatocyte damage, autoimmune AIH markers such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and hepatic Tc1 immunity. This injurious effect was lost without the ability of L. reuteri to produce tryptophan catabolite I3A and in mice that lack AhR expression within CD8 T cells. We identified that naive Tet2 deficient CD8 T cells display a heightened sensitivity to extrinsic IFN-γ. Therefore, I3A-induced IFN-γ production -that occurs independent of Tet2- promoted a vicious feedforward cycle that led to AIH-like pathology in our model. Accordingly, we found that genetic Ifng ablation prevented the development of, and neutralization of IFN-γ reverted ongoing, AIH-like pathology in our model.17 However, more pre-clinical and clinical studies are warranted to explore the role of the liver microbiota in AIH.
Other autoimmune pathologies
Oral administration of L. reuteri was linked with an improvement of rheumatoid arthritis48 and was found to impact on the disease course of human atopic dermatitis patients (AD)49,50,111 (see Table 2). In a dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB)-induced AD-model, DNFB treatment lowered the concentration of microbial tryptophan catabolites, especially ILA and indole-3-propionic acid, and suppressed AhR expression.62 Both AhR expression and the expression of tryptophan catabolites were restored by L. reuteri strain DYNDL22M62. L. reuteri strain DYNDL22M62 most significantly reduced ear swelling compared to strains FSDLZ12M1, GLDZ105 and FWXBH12M3. Additionally, L. reuteri strain DYNDL22M62 was the only strain able to suppress thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), as well as immunoglobin E (IgE), IL-4 and IL-5 alongside strain FSDLZ12M1.62 While this study does not address the requirement or sufficiency of tryptophan catabolites or AhR activation in improvement of clinical AD symptoms, another report corroborated that the ability of tryptophan catabolites to attenuate AD-like pathology is AhR dependent.112 Using an MC903 model of AD, the authors demonstrated that the tryptophan catabolite I3A was able to significantly reduce ear thickness, IgE levels, and CD4+ T cell and Gr1+ myeloid cell ear infiltrates, but this effect was abrogated in AhR-deficient mice. Mechanistically, I3A activated AhR, which then bound to the TSLP promoter to inhibit the production of TSLP in keratinocytes.112 Taking both studies into consideration, L. reuteri may play a protective role in AD through AhR activation mediated by its metabolites, but the effects differ appreciably from strain to strain.
Generally, L. reuteri mediates protection in autoimmune diseases through its ability to promote Treg cell differentiation. L. reuteri 17938 and 5454-derived supernatant increased the production of Foxp3+ Treg cells through activation of CD103+ DCs.75,113 L. reuteri 17938 also activated DCs through toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) to expand Tregs in a model of necrotizing enterocolitis.114 In addition to increasing Treg populations, L. reuteri may combat autoimmunity in Treg-deficient disease models by decreasing inflammation. Colonization of L. reuteri can shift the microbiome composition, and can increase the production of certain metabolites, such as adenosine and inosine,85 by the gut microbiota in mice with Treg deficiency.115 In scurfy mice, a model of Treg deficiency, either L. reuteri or inosine alone was able to reduce Th1/Th2 cell populations and lower inflammation in Treg-deficient disorders through interactions with the adenosine A2A receptor.67
L. reuteri immunomodulation in the context of cancer
Cancer patients are increasingly interested in using probiotics to augment health:13 a recent study found almost half of its cohort of advanced melanoma patients initiating ICI treatment self-administered probiotics.116 L. reuteri has been highlighted for its ability to modulate antitumor immunity at both intestinal and gut-distal tumors, due its ability to translocate and produce highly immunomodulatory metabolites (Table 2 and Figure 2).
Anti-tumor function of L. reuteri – cancer that arises at intestinal sites
Native to the gut, L. reuteri colonization and its metabolite production impacts the development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC).117 Much of L. reuteri’s impact on gastrointestinal cancers is preventative, through homeostatic functions such as protecting the intestinal barrier, lowering chronic inflammation, and ameliorating infection by pathogenic bacteria that can drive cancer development.118 In an azoxymethane-dextran sodium sulfate model of CRC, L. reuteri significantly decreased the relative abundance of CD11b+ Gr1+ myeloid cells compared with mice that did not receive exogenous Lactobacilli, possibly playing a role in the prevention of colitis-associated cancer.69 L. reuteri can also lower tumor burden after cancer initiation in gastrointestinal cancers. ILA, a tryptophan catabolite produced by L. reuteri, downregulated IL-17 signaling and mediated the chemo-preventative effect of statins in murine CRC.71 Both L. reuteri and ILA gavage reduced tumor burden in a CRC murine cancer model. Ex vivo co-culture of naïve CD4+ T cells and ILA markedly reduced the percentage of IL-17A CD4+ T cells in a dose dependent manner. The reduction in Th17 response was mediated by the ability of ILA to decrease the binding of master transcription factor RORγt to IL-17a and IL-23 r promoters. Another L. reuteri-derived metabolite, histamine, was associated with survival in CRC patients.69 Patients with high expression of HDC, a gene encoding the key enzyme for histamine generation, had significantly higher survival. In a pre-clinical, chemically induced CRC model, L. reuteri was able to reduce tumor node abundance and overall tumor size. HdcA mutant L. reuteri that cannot produce histamine was less protective against CRC tumor burden, but still more protective compared to the control group. These findings importantly imply that the protective ability of L. reuteri is partially, but not completely, dependent on its histamine production.69 Reuterin, a L. reuteri metabolite most notable for its antimicrobial properties, was able to inhibit the proliferation and increase the apoptosis of colon cancer cells by increasing intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS).70 Global transcriptomic analysis of CRC-cells revealed that reuterin upregulates genes in the oxidative stress pathway. The induction of apoptosis was specific to CRC cell lines HCT116, SW480, DLD1, and RKO, but was absent in primary cell lines, implying a tumor-specific effect.70 Another study indicated that heat-killed L. reuteri induced apoptosis through Akt-p53 dependent mitochondrial apoptosis in a MKN1 human gastric cancer cell line.72 Given that non-metabolically active L. reuteri can induce apoptosis in a tumor-specific manner, it is likely that there is a cellular component mediating tumor cell death.
Anti-tumor function of L. reuteri – cancer that arises at extra-intestinal sites
Reinvigorating antitumor immunity by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment is a core component of cancer therapy that has shown unprecedented efficacy. However, only a fraction of cancer patients respond to ICI treatment.104 Approaches that further potentiate antitumor immunity are urgently needed to boost ICI efficacy. It is well accepted that the microbiome significantly impacts on anti-tumor immunity, as well as ICI-responsiveness.104 Still, the impact of probiotics on ICI responsiveness in cancer patients, as well as the mechanisms that drive these effects, remain poorly understood. In a recent study of our laboratory, we set out to test whether some of the most frequently used probiotics impact preclinical B16 melanoma outgrowth. While we observed that several probiotics restrained tumor outgrowth, L. reuteri displayed the most potent ability to restrain tumor growth and enhance antitumor Tc1 immunity.16 Furthermore, L. reuteri potentiated both αPD-L1 and αCTLA-4 immunotherapy. The antitumoral effect of L. reuteri extended to ICI-resistant BRAFV600E melanoma, MC38 adenocarcinoma, and MMTV-PyMT breast cancer models. Accumulating evidence suggests the presence of a tumor microbiome in gut-distal cancer, and live bacteria have been recovered from breast and pancreatic patient tumors.18,119–122 However, it remained unaddressed whether intratumoral bacteria in gut-distal tumors are passive inhabitants or active participants that impact tumor development. By deploying a novel culturomics approach123 we uncovered that L. reuteri translocates to and persists in gut-distal tumors. Further investigation demonstrated that viable intratumoral L. reuteri was critical for the restraint of tumor growth, indicating that both the translocation and metabolic activity of L. reuteri was necessary for its antitumor potential. L. reuteri-derived I3A enhanced Tc1 immunity by activating AhR in CD8 T cells, leading to the significantly increased production of IFN-γ and expression of the Tc1-regulating transcription factor Blimp1 by CD8 T cells. Remarkably, antitumoral immune responses in response to L. reuteri were local to the tumor, and could be recapitulated by intratumoral injections of I3A. We also identified a potential role of I3A in promoting ICI response and survival in melanoma patients. The enhancement of antitumoral Tc1 immunity by L. reuteri was dependent on dietary tryptophan, highlighting a key role of diet in probiotic immunomodulation.16 A recent randomized, controlled trial found that healthy volunteers that consumed 3 g of l-tryptophan supplements a day for 2 weeks had substantially increased AhR activation (by reporter cell assay) and production of tryptophan catabolites, including I3A.124 Additionally, participants did not suffer any abdominal or psychological symptoms while on a high tryptophan diet, suggesting that dietary tryptophan supplementation may be able to be successfully used alongside L. reuteri in future clinical trials.
A growing number of studies indicate that L. reuteri produces several metabolites with antitumor potential. Another L. reuteri produced metabolite, the SCFA acetate, was able to reduce tumor burden in a murine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) model by inhibiting IL-17A production.73 L. reuteri administration decreased overall IL-17A levels in serum and selectively reduced the IL-17A production of hepatic ILC3s, but not thymic or splenic cells. Acetate co-culture alone was able to reduce the percentage of IL-17A producing hepatic ILC3s through histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition. On a transcriptional level, acetate significantly decreased Sox13 binding to the IL-17a promoter inhibiting IL-17A transcription. Acetate acted synergistically with αPD-1 ICI treatment to decrease tumor number and ILC3 production of IL-17A.73 While these studies highlight the ability of L. reuteri to suppress tumor growth, they also are highly suggestive that L. reuteri may be able to strengthen current treatment regimens being used in the clinic, such as ICI therapy and chemotherapy.
A report identified that L. reuteri administration significantly reduced tumor outgrowth of westernized diet-induced mammary tumors in Swiss mice. The protective effect of consuming L. reuteri occurred in a CD25 cell-dependent manner. Moreover, L. reuteri-treated donor CD4+ CD45RBlo CD25+ immune cells were sufficient for the suppression of mammary tumors upon transfer into untreated recipient HER2/neu mutant mice.68
Pro-tumor function of L. reuteri
Most studies centered around the role of L. reuteri in cancer show its ability to positively impact patient outcomes and enhance antitumor immunity, but there is some evidence that it may create tumorigenic environments in the context of certain genetic susceptibilities. In the absence of hematopoietic Tet2, we demonstrated that translocating L. reuteri in the circulatory system can act as a general TLR2 agonist, causing IL-6 receptor-overexpressing granulocyte-myeloid progenitor cells to differentiate into IL-6-producing CD11b+ Gr1+ myeloid cells.18 This continuous cycle of inflammation led to the development of pre-leukemic myeloproliferation, potentially setting the stage for the development of overt leukemia.
Conclusion and future directions
Despite being a widely consumed probiotic commonly found in many foods, L. reuteri has the remarkable ability to influence the course of disease. L. reuteri has revealed itself as a highly immunomodulatory probiotic bacterium, modulating local and systemic immune responses during steady state and complex pathologies, including intestinal inflammatory disorders, autoimmunity, and cancer. While the impact of L. reuteri in the context of gastrointestinal pathology is better understood,15 we are just beginning to uncover mechanisms of how L. reuteri tunes systemic immunity during homeostasis and in complex diseases such as autoimmunity and cancer (Figures 1 and 2). Previous studies demonstrate that the context (type of disease (e.g. autoimmunity, cancer) or environmental factors (e.g. diet) dictates whether L. reuteri behaves as a symbiont or a pathobiont. However, more mechanistic studies are required to better understand which and how environmental factor(s) modulate the host-immunomodulatory potential of L. reuteri (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Environmental factors modulating microbe-host interactions in context of health and disease. L. reuteri is modulated by various environmental factors including lifestyle, diet, co-morbidities, presences of other commensal bacteria and exposure to radiation. In turn, L. reuteri and its metabolites have multiple impacts on the host via immunomodulation, intestinal barrier integrity, protection from pathobionts, translocation to extra-intestinal sites and resistances to intestinal pH and bile salts.
One critical future area of focus involves understanding the strain-dependent effects of L. reuteri, as different strains can have widely differing roles on immunomodulation, as referenced throughout this review. Both strain-dependent effects as well as differing efficiencies of L. reuteri colonization may explain some of the conflicting results reported when examining the health impacts of L. reuteri.
The ability of L. reuteri to translocate has emerged only recently, yet many studies discussed here suggest the importance of translocation for L. reuteri’s effect on host immunity. The mechanisms on how L. reuteri translocates to systemic sites and the ability of homeostatic translocation to impact immunity are still not fully understood and require further mechanistic interrogation. A better understanding of L. reuteri’s translocation may also shed light on how other commensals modulate immunotherapies. This may be especially important in cancer contexts, given that the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy is highly linked with the presence of a cancer microbiome.125
One key mechanism by which L. reuteri modulates immune responses both during homeostasis and in complex diseases such as autoimmunity and cancer is through its produced metabolites. With this observation comes the exciting new question of how we can orchestrate the L. reuteri metabolome to drive certain immune responses. One way to tune the metabolic output of the gut microbiota, including commensals such as L. reuteri, is via the diet. There is emerging evidence that demonstrate that dietary changes be able to impact the effects of commensals on systemic immunity.16,61,66,126
It will be important in future studies to interrogate how we can use diet as a tool to precisely and selectively modulate microbial metabolic pathways in L. reuteri to tailor immunity to our needs. Unraveling the intricate and diverse relationships between host nutrition, the microbiome, and the metabolome will largely be driven by multi-omics approaches, including metagenomics, metaproteomics, culturomics, and metabolomics, in combination with mechanistic studies. On a clinical level, precision dietary inventions paired with microbiota-based therapeutics (e.g. probiotics, FMTs) will allow clinicians to calibrate the microbial metabolome for each patient.
Decades of studies discerning the numerous ways L. reuteri impacts human health outcomes now opens doors for new research to translate L. reuteri effectively into the clinic and sets up a foundation to unlock the immunomodulating mechanisms of other probiotic bacteria.
Funding Statement
Image was generated using BioRender. This work was supported by an Investigator Start-up Fund, Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, an [NIH/NIDDK R01 DK130897], a SPORE [NIH P50 CA254865] grant and a Melanoma Research Alliance award https://doi.org/10.48050/pc.gr.143738 (820677) to M.M.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
References
- 1.Cavaillon JM, Legout S.. Centenary of the death of Elie Metchnikoff: a visionary and an outstanding team leader. Microbes Infect. 2016;18(10):577–33. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mackowiak PA. Recycling metchnikoff: probiotics, the intestinal microbiome and the quest for long life. Front Public Health. 2013;1:52. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani RB, Flint HJ, Salminen S, et al. Expert consensus document. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Suez J, Zmora N, Segal E, Elinav E. The pros, cons, and many unknowns of probiotics. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):716–729. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0439-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kalmar Z, Kiss A, Morocz I, Telek B. A rare clinical picture–the hypereosinophilic syndrome. Orv Hetil. 1986;127(5):251–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Prisciandaro L, Geier M, Butler R, Cummins A, Howarth G. Probiotics and their derivatives as treatments for inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(12):1906–1914. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blaabjerg S, Artzi DM, Aabenhus R. Probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in outpatients—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Antibiot (Basel). 2017;6(4):21. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics6040021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cristofori F, Dargenio VN, Dargenio C, Miniello VL, Barone M, Francavilla R. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of probiotics in gut inflammation: a door to the body. Front Immunol. 2021;12:578386. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.578386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Akram N, Faisal Z, Irfan R, Shah YA, Batool SA, Zahid T, Zulfiqar A, Fatima A, Jahan Q, Tariq H, et al. Exploring the serotonin-probiotics-gut health axis: a review of current evidence and potential mechanisms. Food Sci Nutr. 2024;12(2):694–706. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Hul M, Cani PD. The gut microbiota in obesity and weight management: microbes as friends or foe? Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023;19(5):258–271. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00794-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kumar S, Kumar R, Rohilla L, Jacob N, Yadav J, Sachdeva N. A high potency multi-strain probiotic improves glycemic control in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled pilot study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021;22(7):1014–1022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu H, Chiou J. Potential benefits of probiotics and prebiotics for coronary heart disease and stroke. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2878. doi: 10.3390/nu13082878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Slizewska K, Markowiak-Kopec P, Slizewska W. The role of probiotics in cancer prevention. Cancers (Basel). 2020;13(1):20. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dronkers TMG, Ouwehand AC, Rijkers GT. Global analysis of clinical trials with probiotics. Heliyon. 2020;6(7):e04467. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abuqwider J, Altamimi M, Mauriello G. Limosilactobacillus reuteri in health and disease. Microorganisms. 2022;10(3):522. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bender MJ, McPherson AC, Phelps CM, Pandey SP, Laughlin CR, Shapira JH, Medina Sanchez L, Rana M, Richie TG, Mims TS, et al. Dietary tryptophan metabolite released by intratumoral lactobacillus reuteri facilitates immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Cell. 2023;186(9):1846–1862.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pandey SP, Bender MJ, McPherson AC, Phelps CM, Sanchez LM, Rana M, Hedden L, Sangani KA, Chen L, Shapira JH, et al. Tet2 deficiency drives liver microbiome dysbiosis triggering Tc1 cell autoimmune hepatitis. Cell Host Microbe. 2022;30(7):1003–1019.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Meisel M, Hinterleitner R, Pacis A, Chen L, Earley ZM, Mayassi T, Pierre JF, Ernest JD, Galipeau HJ, Thuille N, et al. Microbial signals drive pre-leukaemic myeloproliferation in a Tet2-deficient host. Nature. 2018;557(7706):580–584. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0125-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fine RL, Mubiru DL, Kriegel MA. Friend or foe? Lactobacillus in the context of autoimmune disease. Adv Immunol. 2020;146:29–56. doi: 10.1016/bs.ai.2020.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Walter J, Britton RA, Roos S. Host-microbial symbiosis in the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract and the Lactobacillus reuteri paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4645–4652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000099107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu Z, Chen J, Liu Y, Meng Q, Liu H, Yao Q, Song W, Ren X, Chen X. The role of potential probiotic strains lactobacillus reuteri in various intestinal diseases: new roles for an old player. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1095555. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1095555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Burman LG. Amplification of sex repressor function of one fi± R-factor during anaerobic growth of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1975;123(1):265–271. doi: 10.1128/jb.123.1.265-271.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jiayan Jiang KL, Xiao A, Zhong Y, Tang J, Duan Y, Li Z, Li Z. Limosilactobacillus reuteri regulating intestinal function: a review. Fermentation. 2023;9(1):19. doi: 10.3390/fermentation9010019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bull M, Plummer S, Marchesi J, Mahenthiralingam E. The life history of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a probiotic: a tale of revisionary taxonomy, misidentification and commercial success. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;349(2):77–87. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kubota M, Ito K, Tomimoto K, Kanazaki M, Tsukiyama K, Kubota A, Kuroki H, Fujita M, Vandenplas Y. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and magnesium oxide in children with functional chronic constipation: a double-blind and randomized clinical trial. Nutrients. 2020;12(1):225. doi: 10.3390/nu12010225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hunt RH, Camilleri M, Crowe SE, El-Omar EM, Fox JG, Kuipers EJ, Malfertheiner P, McColl KE, Pritchard DM, Rugge M, et al. The stomach in health and disease. Gut. 2015;64(10):1650–1668. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Valeur N, Engel P, Carbajal N, Connolly E, Ladefoged K. Colonization and immunomodulation by lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 in the human gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(2):1176–1181. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1176-1181.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Krumbeck JA, Marsteller NL, Frese SA, Peterson DA, Ramer-Tait AE, Hutkins RW, Walter J. Characterization of the ecological role of genes mediating acid resistance in Lactobacillus reuteri during colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(7):2172–2184. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Takiishi T, Fenero CIM, Camara NOS. Intestinal barrier and gut microbiota: shaping our immune responses throughout life. Tissue Barriers. 2017;5(4):e1373208. doi: 10.1080/21688370.2017.1373208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu AH. Revisiting the hygiene hypothesis for allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(4):860–865. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chopyk DM, Grakoui A. Contribution of the intestinal microbiome and gut barrier to hepatic disorders. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(3):849–863. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McPherson AC, Pandey SP, Bender MJ, Meisel M. Systemic immunoregulatory consequences of gut commensal translocation. Trends Immunol. 2021;42(2):137–150. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Martens EC, Neumann M, Desai MS. Interactions of commensal and pathogenic microorganisms with the intestinal mucosal barrier. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(8):457–470. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0036-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Okumura R, Takeda K. Roles of intestinal epithelial cells in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49(5):e338. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wu H, Xie S, Miao J, Li Y, Wang Z, Wang M, Yu Q. Lactobacillus reuteri maintains intestinal epithelial regeneration and repairs damaged intestinal mucosa. Gut Microbes. 2020;11(4):997–1014. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1734423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meisel M, Mayassi T, Fehlner-Peach H, Koval JC, O’Brien SL, Hinterleitner R, Lesko K, Kim S, Bouziat R, Chen L, et al. Interleukin-15 promotes intestinal dysbiosis with butyrate deficiency associated with increased susceptibility to colitis. ISME J. 2017;11(1):15–30. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bach Knudsen KE, Laerke HN, Hedemann MS, Nielsen TS, Ingerslev AK, Gundelund Nielsen DS, Theil PK, Purup S, Hald S, Schioldan AG, et al. Impact of diet-modulated butyrate production on intestinal barrier function and inflammation. Nutrients. 2018;10(10):1499. doi: 10.3390/nu10101499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liang L, Liu L, Zhou W, Yang C, Mai G, Li H, Chen Y. Gut microbiota-derived butyrate regulates gut mucus barrier repair by activating the macrophage/wnt/erk signaling pathway. Clin Sci (Lond). 2022;136(4):291–307. doi: 10.1042/CS20210778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Asare PT, Greppi A, Geirnaert A, Pennacchia A, Babst A, Lacroix C. Glycerol and reuterin-producing Limosilactobacillus reuteri enhance butyrate production and inhibit Enterobacteriaceae in broiler chicken cecal microbiota PolyFermS model. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-03091-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lamas B, Hernandez-Galan L, Galipeau HJ, Constante M, Clarizio A, Jury J, Breyner NM, Caminero A, Rueda G, Hayes CL, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand production by the gut microbiota is decreased in celiac disease leading to intestinal inflammation. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(566). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba0624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yang F, Wang A, Zeng X, Hou C, Liu H, Qiao S. Lactobacillus reuteri I5007 modulates tight junction protein expression in IPEC-J2 cells with LPS stimulation and in newborn piglets under normal conditions. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0372-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu H, Hou C, Wang G, Jia H, Yu H, Zeng X, Thacker PA, Zhang G, Qiao S. Lactobacillus reuteri I5007 modulates intestinal host defense peptide expression in the model of IPEC-J2 cells and neonatal piglets. Nutrients. 2017;9(6):559. doi: 10.3390/nu9060559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jorgensen MR, Keller MK, Kragelund C, Hamberg K, Ericson D, Nielsen CH, Twetman S. Lactobacillus reuteri supplements do not affect salivary IgA or cytokine levels in healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(5):399–404. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2016.1169439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Braathen G, Ingildsen V, Twetman S, Ericson D, Jorgensen MR. Presence of Lactobacillus reuteri in saliva coincide with higher salivary IgA in young adults after intake of probiotic lozenges. Benef Microbes. 2017;8(1):17–22. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ericson D, Hamberg K, Bratthall G, Sinkiewicz-Enggren G, Ljunggren L. Salivary IgA response to probiotic bacteria and mutans streptococci after the use of chewing gum containing lactobacillus reuteri. Pathog Dis. 2013;68(3):82–87. doi: 10.1111/2049-632X.12048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lorea Baroja M, Kirjavainen PV, Hekmat S, Reid G. Anti-inflammatory effects of probiotic yogurt in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;149(3):470–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03434.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Oliva S, Di Nardo G, Ferrari F, Mallardo S, Rossi P, Patrizi G, Cucchiara S, Stronati L. Randomised clinical trial: the effectiveness of lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 rectal enema in children with active distal ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(3):327–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04939.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pineda Mde L, Thompson SF, Summers K, de Leon F, Pope J, Reid G. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study of probiotics in active rheumatoid arthritis. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17(6):CR347–CR354. doi: 10.12659/msm.881808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Michelotti A, Cestone E, De Ponti I, Giardina S, Pisati M, Sparta E, Tursi F. Efficacy of a probiotic supplement in patients with atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur J Dermatol. 2021;31(2):225–232. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2021.4019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rosenfeldt V, Benfeldt E, Nielsen SD, Michaelsen KF, Jeppesen DL, Valerius NH, Paerregaard A. Effect of probiotic lactobacillus strains in children with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(2):389–395. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rosenfeldt V, Benfeldt E, Valerius NH, Paerregaard A, Michaelsen KF. Effect of probiotics on gastrointestinal symptoms and small intestinal permeability in children with atopic dermatitis. J Pediatr. 2004;145(5):612–616. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.06.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang G, Wang X, Ma Y, Cai S, Yang L, Fan Y, Zeng X, Qiao S. Lactobacillus reuteri improves the development and maturation of fecal microbiota in piglets through mother-to-infant microbe and metabolite vertical transmission. Microbiome. 2022;10(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01336-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xie S, Zhao S, Jiang L, Lu L, Yang Q, Yu Q. Lactobacillus reuteri stimulates intestinal epithelial proliferation and induces differentiation into goblet cells in young chickens. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(49):13758–13766. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ali MS, Lee E-B, Quah Y, Sayem SAJ, Abbas MA, Suk K, Lee S-J, Park S-C. Modulating effects of heat-killed and live Limosilactobacillus reuteri PSC102 on the immune response and gut microbiota of cyclophosphamide-treated rats. Vet Q. 2024;44(1):1–18. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2024.2344765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang P, Li Y, Xiao H, Shi Y, Le GW, Sun J. Isolation of lactobacillus reuteri from Peyer’s patches and their effects on sIgA production and gut microbiota diversity. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60(9):2020–2030. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201501065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sims IM, Frese SA, Walter J, Loach D, Wilson M, Appleyard K, Eason J, Livingston M, Baird M, Cook G, et al. Structure and functions of exopolysaccharide produced by gut commensal lactobacillus reuteri 100-23. ISME J. 2011;5(7):1115–1124. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cervantes-Barragan L, Chai JN, Tianero MD, Di Luccia B, Ahern PP, Merriman J, Cortez VS, Caparon MG, Donia MS, Gilfillan S, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri induces gut intraepithelial CD4 + CD8αα + T cells. Science. 2017;357(6353):806–810. doi: 10.1126/science.aah5825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jung H, Lee HH, Kang H, Cho H. Immune boosting effect of Limosilactobacillus Reuteri in immunocompetent C57BL/6J mice. J Med Food. 2024;27(8):713–719. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2024.k.0085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Britton RA, Irwin R, Quach D, Schaefer L, Zhang J, Lee T, Parameswaran N, McCabe LR. Probiotic L. reuteri treatment prevents bone loss in a menopausal ovariectomized mouse model. J Cell Physiol. 2014;229(11):1822–1830. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yang Y, Nguyen M, Khetrapal V, Sonnert ND, Martin AL, Chen H, Kriegel MA, Palm NW. Within-host evolution of a gut pathobiont facilitates liver translocation. Nature. 2022;607(7919):563–570. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04949-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Montgomery TL, Eckstrom K, Lile KH, Caldwell S, Heney ER, Lahue KG, D’Alessandro A, Wargo MJ, Krementsov DN. Lactobacillus reuteri tryptophan metabolism promotes host susceptibility to CNS autoimmunity. Microbiome. 2022;10(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01408-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fang Z, Pan T, Wang H, Zhu J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Chen W, Lu W. Limosilactobacillus reuteri attenuates atopic dermatitis via changes in Gut Bacteria and indole derivatives from tryptophan metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14):7735. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhou J, Xu G, Li X, Tu H, Li H, Chang H, Chen J, Yu R, Qi C, Sun J. Limosilactobacillus reuteri FN041 prevents atopic dermatitis in pup mice by remodeling the ileal microbiota and regulating gene expression in Peyer’s patches after vertical transmission. Front Nutr. 2022;9:987400. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.987400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wilck N, Matus MG, Kearney SM, Olesen SW, Forslund K, Bartolomaeus H, Haase S, Mahler A, Balogh A, Marko L, et al. Salt-responsive gut commensal modulates T(H)17 axis and disease. Nature. 2017;551(7682):585–589. doi: 10.1038/nature24628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Miyauchi E, Kim SW, Suda W, Kawasumi M, Onawa S, Taguchi-Atarashi N, Morita H, Taylor TD, Hattori M, Ohno H. Gut microorganisms act together to exacerbate inflammation in spinal cords. Nature. 2020;585(7823):102–106. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2634-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zegarra-Ruiz DF, El Beidaq A, Iniguez AJ, Lubrano Di Ricco M, Manfredo Vieira S, Ruff WE, Mubiru D, Fine RL, Sterpka J, Greiling TM, et al. A diet-sensitive commensal lactobacillus strain mediates TLR7-dependent systemic autoimmunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25(1):113–127.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.He B, Hoang TK, Wang T, Ferris M, Taylor CM, Tian X, Luo M, Tran DQ, Zhou J, Tatevian N, et al. Resetting microbiota by lactobacillus reuteri inhibits T reg deficiency–induced autoimmunity via adenosine A2A receptors. J Exp Med. 2017;214(1):107–123. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lakritz JR, Poutahidis T, Levkovich T, Varian BJ, Ibrahim YM, Chatzigiagkos A, Mirabal S, Alm EJ, Erdman SE. Beneficial bacteria stimulate host immune cells to counteract dietary and genetic predisposition to mammary cancer in mice. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(3):529–540. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Gao C, Ganesh BP, Shi Z, Shah RR, Fultz R, Major A, Venable S, Lugo M, Hoch K, Chen X, et al. Gut microbe–mediated suppression of inflammation-associated colon carcinogenesis by luminal histamine production. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(10):2323–2336. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bell HN, Rebernick RJ, Goyert J, Singhal R, Kuljanin M, Kerk SA, Huang W, Das NK, Andren A, Solanki S, et al. Reuterin in the healthy gut microbiome suppresses colorectal cancer growth through altering redox balance. Cancer Cell. 2022;40(2):185–200.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Han JX, Tao ZH, Wang JL, Zhang L, Yu CY, Kang ZR, Xie Y, Li J, Lu S, Cui Y, et al. Microbiota-derived tryptophan catabolites mediate the chemopreventive effects of statins on colorectal cancer. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8(5):919–933. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01363-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kim S, Lee HH, Choi W, Kang CH, Kim GH, Cho H. Anti-tumor effect of heat-killed bifidobacterium bifidum on human gastric cancer through akt-p53-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis in xenograft models. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9788. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hu C, Xu B, Wang X, Wan WH, Lu J, Kong D, Jin Y, You W, Sun H, Mu X, et al. Gut microbiota–derived short-chain fatty acids regulate group 3 innate lymphoid cells in HCC. Hepatology. 2023;77(1):48–64. doi: 10.1002/hep.32449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lee J, Kim S, Kang CH. Immunostimulatory activity of lactic acid bacteria cell-free supernatants through the activation of nf-κB and MAPK signaling pathways in RAW 264.7 cells. Microorganisms. 2022;10(11):2247. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10112247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Haileselassie Y, Navis M, Vu N, Qazi KR, Rethi B, Sverremark-Ekstrom E. Postbiotic modulation of retinoic acid imprinted mucosal-like dendritic cells by probiotic lactobacillus reuteri 17938 in vitro. Front Immunol. 2016;7:96. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jones SE, Versalovic J. Probiotic lactobacillus reuteri biofilms produce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Thomas CM, Hong T, van Pijkeren JP, Hemarajata P, Trinh DV, Hu W, Britton RA, Kalkum M, Versalovic J, Heimesaat MM. Histamine derived from probiotic lactobacillus reuteri suppresses TNF via modulation of PKA and ERK signaling. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(2):e31951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rasouli BS, Ghadimi-Darsajini A, Nekouian R, Iragian GR. In vitro activity of probiotic lactobacillus reuteri against gastric cancer progression by downregulation of urokinase plasminogen activator/urokinase plasminogen activator receptor gene expression. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(2):246–251. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.204897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Iyer C, Kosters A, Sethi G, Kunnumakkara AB, Aggarwal BB, Versalovic J. Probiotic lactobacillus reuteri promotes tnf-induced apoptosis in human myeloid leukemia-derived cells by modulation of nf-κB and MAPK signalling. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(7):1442–1452. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kissova Z, Tkacikova L, Mudronova D, Bhide MR. Immunomodulatory effect of lactobacillus reuteri (Limosilactobacillus reuteri) and Its Exopolysaccharides investigated on epithelial cell Line IPEC-J2 challenged with salmonella typhimurium. Life (Basel). 2022;12(12):12. doi: 10.3390/life12121955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.O’Flaherty S, Briner Crawley A, Theriot CM, Barrangou R, Ellermeier CD. The lactobacillus bile salt hydrolase repertoire reveals niche-specific adaptation. mSphere. 2018;3(3). doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00140-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Song X, Sun X, Oh SF, Wu M, Zhang Y, Zheng W, Geva-Zatorsky N, Jupp R, Mathis D, Benoist C, et al. Microbial bile acid metabolites modulate gut RORγ+ regulatory T cell homeostasis. Nature. 2020;577(7790):410–415. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1865-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Yang BH, Hagemann S, Mamareli P, Lauer U, Hoffmann U, Beckstette M, Fohse L, Prinz I, Pezoldt J, Suerbaum S, et al. Foxp3+ T cells expressing RORγt represent a stable regulatory T-cell effector lineage with enhanced suppressive capacity during intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9(2):444–457. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Luo Z, Chen A, Xie A, Liu X, Jiang S, Yu R. Limosilactobacillus reuteri in immunomodulation: molecular mechanisms and potential applications. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1228754. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1228754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Liu Y, Armbrister SA, Okeugo B, Mills TW, Daniel RC, Oh JH, van Pijkeren JP, Park ES, Saleh ZM, Lahiri S, et al. Probiotic-derived ecto-5’-nucleotidase produces anti-inflammatory adenosine metabolites in treg-deficient scurfy mice. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2023;15(4):1001–1013. doi: 10.1007/s12602-023-10089-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Zelante T, Iannitti RG, Cunha C, De Luca A, Giovannini G, Pieraccini G, Zecchi R, D’Angelo C, Massi-Benedetti C, Fallarino F, et al. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity. 2013;39(2):372–385. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Vyhlidalova B, Krasulova K, Pecinkova P, Marcalikova A, Vrzal R, Zemankova L, Vanco J, Travnicek Z, Vondracek J, Karasova M, et al. Gut microbial catabolites of tryptophan are ligands and agonists of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor: a detailed characterization. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(7):2614. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Dean JW, Zhou L. Cell-intrinsic view of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in tumor immunity. Trends Immunol. 2022;43(3):245–258. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2022.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Schenk H, Neumann D, Kloth C. Histamine regulates murine primary dendritic cell functions. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2016;38(5):379–384. doi: 10.1080/08923973.2016.1214144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Fransen F, Zagato E, Mazzini E, Fosso B, Manzari C, El Aidy S, Chiavelli A, D’Erchia AM, Sethi MK, Pabst O, et al. Balb/c and C57BL/6 mice differ in Polyreactive IgA abundance, which impacts the generation of antigen-specific IgA and microbiota diversity. Immunity. 2015;43(3):527–540. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Bunker JJ, Flynn TM, Koval JC, Shaw DG, Meisel M, McDonald BD, Ishizuka IE, Dent AL, Wilson PC, Jabri B, et al. Innate and adaptive humoral responses coat distinct commensal bacteria with immunoglobulin a. Immunity. 2015;43(3):541–553. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bunker JJ, Erickson SA, Flynn TM, Henry C, Koval JC, Meisel M, Jabri B, Antonopoulos DA, Wilson PC, Bendelac A. Natural polyreactive IgA antibodies coat the intestinal microbiota. Science. 2017;358(6361). doi: 10.1126/science.aan6619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Liu HY, Giraud A, Seignez C, Ahl D, Guo F, Sedin J, Walden T, Oh JH, van Pijkeren JP, Holm L, et al. Distinct B cell subsets in Peyer’s patches convey probiotic effects by Limosilactobacillus reuteri. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01128-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Gupta N, Ferreira J, Hong CHL, Tan KS. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 5289 ameliorates chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73292-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hsiao YP, Chen HL, Tsai JN, Lin MY, Liao JW, Wei MS, Ko JL, Ou CC. Administration of Lactobacillus reuteri combined with Clostridium butyricum attenuates cisplatin-induced renal damage by gut microbiota reconstitution, increasing butyric acid production, and suppressing renal inflammation. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2792. doi: 10.3390/nu13082792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mu Q, Tavella VJ, Luo XM. Role of Lactobacillus reuteri in human health and diseases. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:757. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.MacKenzie DA, Jeffers F, Parker ML, Vibert-Vallet A, Bongaerts RJ, Roos S, Walter J, Juge N. Strain-specific diversity of mucus-binding proteins in the adhesion and aggregation properties of lactobacillus reuteri. Microbiol (Read). 2010;156(11):3368–3378. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.043265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Manfredo Vieira S, Hiltensperger M, Kumar V, Zegarra-Ruiz D, Dehner C, Khan N, Costa FRC, Tiniakou E, Greiling T, Ruff W, et al. Translocation of a gut pathobiont drives autoimmunity in mice and humans. Science. 2018;359(6380):1156–1161. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Geva-Zatorsky N, Sefik E, Kua L, Pasman L, Tan TG, Ortiz-Lopez A, Yanortsang TB, Yang L, Jupp R, Mathis D, et al. Mining the human gut microbiota for immunomodulatory organisms. Cell. 2017;168(5):928–943.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.De Luca F, Shoenfeld Y. The microbiome in autoimmune diseases. Clin Exp Immunol. 2019;195(1):74–85. doi: 10.1111/cei.13158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Phelps CM, Meisel M. Team victory, yellow helmets for a computational tour de force. Cell. 2022;185(19):3459–3461. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.He B, Hoang TK, Tian X, Taylor CM, Blanchard E, Luo M, Bhattacharjee MB, Freeborn J, Park S, Couturier J, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri reduces the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice by modulating gut microbiota. Front Immunol. 2019;10:385. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ross FC, Patangia D, Grimaud G, Lavelle A, Dempsey EM, Ross RP, Stanton C. The interplay between diet and the gut microbiome: implications for health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024;22(11):671–686. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01068-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Routy B, Jackson T, Mahlmann L, Baumgartner CK, Blaser M, Byrd A, Corvaia N, Couts K, Davar D, Derosa L, et al. Melanoma and microbiota: current understanding and future directions. Cancer Cell. 2024;42(1):16–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Christovich A, Luo XM. Gut microbiota, Leaky gut, and autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2022;13:946248. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.946248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Barouei J, Bendiks Z, Martinic A, Mishchuk D, Heeney D, Hsieh YH, Kieffer D, Zaragoza J, Martin R, Slupsky C, et al. Microbiota, metabolome, and immune alterations in obese mice fed a high-fat diet containing type 2 resistant starch. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(11):61. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201700184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Wang L, Fouts DE, Starkel P, Hartmann P, Chen P, Llorente C, DePew J, Moncera K, Ho SB, Brenner DA, et al. Intestinal REG3 lectins protect against alcoholic steatohepatitis by reducing mucosa-associated microbiota and preventing bacterial translocation. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19(2):227–239. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Bataller R, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(2):209–218. doi: 10.1172/JCI24282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Czaja AJ. Examining pathogenic concepts of autoimmune hepatitis for cues to future investigations and interventions. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(45):6579–6606. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i45.6579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Wei Y, Zeng B, Chen J, Cui G, Lu C, Wu W, Yang J, Wei H, Xue R, Bai L, et al. Enterogenous bacterial glycolipids are required for the generation of natural killer T cells mediated liver injury. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):36365. doi: 10.1038/srep36365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Mocanu M, Vata D, Alexa AI, Trandafir L, Patrascu AI, Hancu MF, Gheuca-Solovastru L. Atopic dermatitis—beyond the skin. Diagn (Basel). 2021;11(9):11. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Yu J, Luo Y, Zhu Z, Zhou Y, Sun L, Gao J, Sun J, Wang G, Yao X, Li W. A tryptophan metabolite of the skin microbiota attenuates inflammation in patients with atopic dermatitis through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(6):2108–2119.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hrdy J, Alard J, Couturier-Maillard A, Boulard O, Boutillier D, Delacre M, Lapadatescu C, Cesaro A, Blanc P, Pot B, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri 5454 and bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis 5764 improve colitis while differentially impacting dendritic cells maturation and antimicrobial responses. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62161-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Hoang TK, He B, Wang T, Tran DQ, Rhoads JM, Liu Y. Protective effect of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 against experimental necrotizing enterocolitis is mediated by Toll-like receptor 2. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018;315(2):G231–G240. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00084.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Liu Y, Hoang TK, Taylor CM, Park ES, Freeborn J, Luo M, Roos S, Rhoads JM. Limosilactobacillus reuteri and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG differentially affect gut microbes and metabolites in mice with treg deficiency. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2021;320(6):G969–G981. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00072.2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Spencer CN, McQuade JL, Gopalakrishnan V, McCulloch JA, Vetizou M, Cogdill AP, Khan MAW, Zhang X, White MG, Peterson CB, et al. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science. 2021;374(6575):1632–1640. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz7015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Bistas KG, Bistas E, Nyamwaya Mogaka E. Lactobacillus reuteri’s role in the prevention of colorectal cancer: a review of literature. Univ Of Toronto Med J. 2020;97(3):29–36. [Google Scholar]
- 118.Peng Y, Ma Y, Luo Z, Jiang Y, Xu Z, Yu R. Lactobacillus reuteri in digestive system diseases: focus on clinical trials and mechanisms. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1254198. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1254198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Geller LT, Barzily-Rokni M, Danino T, Jonas OH, Shental N, Nejman D, Gavert N, Zwang Y, Cooper ZA, Shee K, et al. Potential role of intratumor bacteria in mediating tumor resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine. Science. 2017;357(6356):1156–1160. doi: 10.1126/science.aah5043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Riquelme E, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Montiel M, Zoltan M, Dong W, Quesada P, Sahin I, Chandra V, San Lucas A, et al. Tumor microbiome diversity and composition influence pancreatic cancer outcomes. Cell. 2019;178(4):795–806.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Nejman D, Livyatan I, Fuks G, Gavert N, Zwang Y, Geller LT, Rotter-Maskowitz A, Weiser R, Mallel G, Gigi E, et al. The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type–specific intracellular bacteria. Science. 2020;368(6494):973–980. doi: 10.1126/science.aay9189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Fu A, Yao B, Dong T, Chen Y, Yao J, Liu Y, Li H, Bai H, Liu X, Zhang Y, et al. Tumor-resident intracellular microbiota promotes metastatic colonization in breast cancer. Cell. 2022;185(8):1356–1372.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Phelps CM, Shapira JH, Laughlin CR, Meisel M. Detection of viable commensal bacteria in murine melanoma tumors by culturomics. Star Protoc. 2023;4(3):102492. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Rueda GH, Causada-Calo N, Borojevic R, Nardelli A, Pinto-Sanchez MI, Constante M, Libertucci J, Mohan V, Langella P, Loonen LMP, et al. Oral tryptophan activates duodenal aryl hydrocarbon receptor in healthy subjects: a crossover randomized controlled trial. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2024;326(6):G687–G696. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00306.2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Boesch M, Horvath L, Baty F, Pircher A, Wolf D, Spahn S, Straussman R, Tilg H, Brutsche MH. Compartmentalization of the host microbiome: how tumor microbiota shapes checkpoint immunotherapy outcome and offers therapeutic prospects. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10(11):e005401. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Devkota S, Wang Y, Musch MW, Leone V, Fehlner-Peach H, Nadimpalli A, Antonopoulos DA, Jabri B, Chang EB. Dietary-fat-induced taurocholic acid promotes pathobiont expansion and colitis in Il10−/− mice. Nature. 2012;487(7405):104–108. doi: 10.1038/nature11225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
