Skip to main content
Journal of Oral Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Oral Microbiology
. 2025 Dec 17;17(1):2598743. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2025.2598743

Candida albicans is a context-dependent risk factor for malignant transformation of oral precancer lesions: a prospective cohort study of 734 Taiwanese patients

Shih Sheng Jiang a, Chung-Hsing Chen a, Fang-Yu Tsai a, Yi-Ping Hsieh b, Tsung-Te Chung c, Jang-Jaer Lee d,e, Mu-Kuan Chen f,g, Yen-Tze Liu g,h,i, Shun-Fa Yang j,k, Chun-Yi Chuang l,m, Wen-Lun Wang n,o, Chih-Chun Wang p,q, Tze-Ta Huang b,r,s, I-Chi Chen a, Pei-Hua Wu a, Yi-Chieh Chen a, Ya-Wen Chen a, Shine-Gwo Shiah a, Li-Hsin Chien t, I-Shou Chang a, Ching-Yu Yen u,v,ɪ, Ko-Jiunn Liu a,*
PMCID: PMC12716479  PMID: 41426190

ABSTRACT

Background

Candida albicans has been implicated in oral carcinogenesis, but its role in the progression of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) remains unclear. We investigated whether high Candida burden in OPMD lesions predicts malignant transformation (MT) and whether this association varied by OPMD subtype.

Patients and methods

In a multicenter prospective cohort study across seven hospitals in Taiwan, 734 OPMD patients were followed for a mean of 2.4 years. Oral lesion swabs were cultured on chromogenic agar to quantify Candida albicans level. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for MT to oral cancer.

Results

MT occurred in 6.8% of patients. High Candida burden was independently associated with increased MT risk (aHR = 2.84; 95% CI: 1.40–5.75). Patients with oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) or verrucous hyperplasia (VH) also had elevated risk (aHR = 4.99; 95% CI: 1.54–10.38). Interaction analysis revealed strong individual risks for high Candida burden (aHR = 13.83) and OSF/VH (aHR = 13.67), with an attenuating interaction term (aHR = 0.11), yielding a substantial combined risk (HR ≈ 20.8). Stratified analysis showed the strongest effect in leukoplakia (HR = 12.19).

Conclusions

High Candida albicans burden is a significant, subtype-dependent risk factor for malignant progression in OPMDs. These findings underline the role of fungal–host interactions in oral carcinogenesis and support the integration of fungal profiling into routine surveillance of OPMDs.

KEYWORDS: Oral potentially malignant disorders, oral squamous cell carcinoma, Candida albicans, malignant transformation, oral microbiota

KEY MESSAGES

  • High oral Candida albicans burden is an independent risk factor for malignant transformation among patients with oral potentially malignant disorders.

  • The prognostic impact of Candida albicans is context-dependent, with the strongest effect observed in lower-risk epithelial lesions such as leukoplakia.

  • Quantifying fungal burden in the oral cavity may improve personalized surveillance strategies for early detection and prevention of oral cancer.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACTS

graphic file with name ZJOM_A_2598743_UF0001_C.jpg

Introduction

Oral cancer represents a significant global health challenge, with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) constituting the majority of cases [1]. In 2020, the Global Cancer Observatory reported over 389,000 new cases and 188,000 associated deaths worldwide, predominantly in Asia [1,2]. OSCC is a male-predominant malignancy, with a male-to-female incidence ratios ranging from 2.2-2.8:1 across regions of varying socioeconomic development [2]. In Taiwan, OSCC ranks as the fourth most common cancer among males [3,4]. Prominent risk factors for OSCC include alcohol consumption, betel quid chewing, and cigarette smoking, which are implicated in the multifactorial aetiology of the disease through both genetic and epigenetic modifications [1,5–8].

Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD), such as leukoplakia, erythroplakia, oral submucous fibrosis (OSF), lichen planus, and verrucous hyperplasia (VH), are well-recognised precursors to OSCC [9]. Among these, OSF and VH exhibit the highest rates of malignant transformation (MT) [10–14]. Additionally, dysplasia remains the most critical histopathological predictor of progression [12,15–17]. However, transformation rates vary widely across OPMD subtypes, complicating risk stratification and early detection strategies. Notably, recent attention has turned to microbial factors, particularly Candida albicans, as potential contributors to this MT process, a gap that remains insufficiently explored.

While often a harmless commensal of the oral microbiota, C. albicans can undergo pathogenic transitions under dysbiotic or immunocompromised conditions [13,18–20]. This shift may lead to biofilm formation, mucosal invasion, and release of pro-inflammatory and carcinogenic metabolites, including nitrosamines and acetaldehyde [21–23]. These compounds can cause DNA damage and contribute to oncogenic transformation. Although prior studies have linked C. albicans to OSCC progression [24,25], its specific contribution to the malignant transformation of OPMDs remains unclear.

This study investigates whether a high oral burden of Candida albicans is associated with increased risk of malignant transformation in a prospective multicenter cohort of Taiwanese patients with OPMDs.

Methods

Study design and population

This multicenter, prospective cohort study enroled 806 patients clinically diagnosed OPMD from seven healthcare facilities across Taiwan between February 2015 and September 2023. Participating centres included five medical centres: National Taiwan University Hospital, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Changhua Christian Hospital, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Chi Mei Medical Centre, along with one quasi-medical centre (E-Da Hospital) and one regional hospital (Show Chwan Memorial Hospital).

Eligible participants were aged 20 to 80 years, had no previous cancer diagnosis, and presented with one or more OPMD subtypes, including oral leukoplakia, erythroleukoplakia, erythroplakia, lichen planus, OSF, VH, or other persistent oral mucosal abnormalities. The latter was operationally defined as persistent intraoral or perioral swellings of unknown origin, non-healing ulcers or erosions lasting more than two weeks, or mucosal surface changes (e.g. discoloration, thickening) without a definitive diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria included any history of invasive cancer, known immunocompromised status (e.g. HIV infection, organ transplantation, or ongoing systemic immunosuppressive or corticosteroid therapy), or use of systemic or topical antifungal agents prior to oral swab collection. All participants were confirmed to be antifungal-naïve at baseline, which served as a key inclusion requirement.

At baseline, participants underwent a standardised oral examination performed by board-certified oral medicine specialists. Structured interviews were conducted to collect data on demographics, health behaviours (smoking, alcohol, and betel quid use), and clinical status. Oral swabs were obtained from both lesion and non-lesion sites to quantify Candida albicans burden (cf. Detection and Quantification of Oral Candida albicans Level section).

Participants were followed every six months through routine clinical surveillance to monitor for progression to OSCC, with diagnoses confirmed histologically. Follow-up continued until MT, loss to follow-up, or study end. The study closed on December 31, 2024. All participants enroled before December 31, 2023, had at least 12 months of follow-up. The cohort, referred to as TWOPMD, was designed and reported in accordance with the STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Of the 806 enroled individuals, 72 were excluded from the longitudinal analysis: 8 who were diagnosed with OSCC within 30 days of enrolment and 64 who were lost to follow-up before their first scheduled visit. These exclusions were applied post-enrolment but prior to outcome ascertainment to ensure that all included participants were at risk and adequately monitored. The remaining 734 individuals comprised the TWOPMD-1 sub-cohort for longitudinal follow-up.

Of the 734 participants included in the final analytic cohort, 50 developed malignant transformation (MT) during the study period. The remaining 684 participants were censored at the end of follow-up on December 31, 2024, as they remained free of MT and none were lost to follow-up. Thus, no participants were censored due to loss to follow-up, and no imputation for missing survival outcome data was necessary. Time-to-event was calculated from the date of enrolment to either histologically confirmed MT or the study end date, whichever came first.

Detection and quantification of oral Candida albicans level

To determine oral Candida albicans burden, swabs were collected from all lesion sites of each patient using sterile cotton swabs, applying a single swabbing motion per lesion. Additionally, one swab from a non-lesion mucosal site was obtained for each participant, typically from a clinically healthy area distant from any lesion (e.g. the contralateral buccal mucosa). As some patients presented with multiple lesions, the number of lesion-site swabs varied. Swabs were immediately placed on ChromID™ Candida Agar (bioMérieux, France) and stored at 4°C. After 48-hour incubation at 33–37°C, Candida albicans colonies were identified by characteristic blue pigmentation. Colony-forming units (CFU) were counted from high-resolution images, with two independent reviewers confirming results. The highest CFU count across all sampled sites (including lesion and non-lesion sites) was used as the individual’s representative fungal burden, because in many cases, Candida growth at the non-lesion site was often comparable to or occasionally even higher than that observed at lesion sites (Supplementary Table S1). Confirmation of C. albicans presence was validated using an RT-PCR method, as detailed in the Supplementary Methods, adapted from the protocol described by Guiver et al. [26].

Definition of study variables

Sociodemographic and behavioural data were obtained via structured, face-to-face interviews. Variables were defined as follows. Alcohol consumption and betel quid chewing were categorised into never, occasional/former, and current, while tobacco smoking into never, ever, and current. An ‘ever’ smoker is one who smoked more than 100 cigarettes during their lifetime. Multifocal lesion was defined as multiple lesions at distinct oral sites, while a unifocal lesion means a lesion at single site. Multiform lesion was defined as more than one OPMD subtype present, while a patient presenting only one subtype was termed uniform. The fibrosis severity was defined based on test to measure the length of the mouth opening, categorised as follows: none (>35mm), mild (26-35mm), moderate (15-25mm), and severe (<15mm). The epithelial dysplasia was determined based on the histopathological images from the major lesion and categorised as no dysplasia, dysplasia present, or unknown due to no biopsy performed. The levels of Candida albicans colonisation were dichotomised as low (0-50 CFU) or high (>51 CFU).

Statistical analysis

Time-to-event outcomes were analysed using Cox proportional hazards models. The proportional hazards assumptions were assessed using Schoenfeld residuals and found to be satisfied. Candida burden data were missing for approximately 25% of eligible participants. Rather than excluding these individuals from the primary analysis, we retained them as a separate ‘unknown’ category to preserve sample size and allow comparative analysis. Given indications of non-random missingness (data not shown), we did not perform data imputation, as it could introduce bias under likely missing-not-at-random (MNAR) conditions. Multivariable model predictors were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) [27]. To evaluate potential multicollinearity, Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) [28,29] was calculated. To explore the associations between Candida albicans burden and lesion subtypes, we conducted two logistic regression analyses: one with Candida level as the outcome and lesion subtype as the predictor, and another reversing this structure. All analyses were conducted using R software version 4.3.1. The packages used include ‘survival’ for Cox proportional hazards modelling, ‘MASS’ for stepwise variable selection using AIC, and ‘car’ for collinearity diagnostics (Variance Inflation Factor).

Results

Demographics, clinical characteristics, and Candida albicans levels in TWOPMD-1 cohort

Of the 806 participants prospectively enroled in the TWOPMD cohort, 72 were excluded dude to a diagnosis of OSCC within 30 days of enrolment (n = 8) or lost to follow-up prior to the first scheduled visit (n = 64), leaving 734 eligible for longitudinal analysis (TWOPMD-1 sub-cohort). We compared baseline characteristics between included (n = 734) and excluded (n = 72) patients (Supplementary Table S2). The groups were broadly similar in terms of age, sex, education level, lifestyle behaviours (alcohol consumption, betel quid chewing, and cigarette smoking), oral Candida albicans levels, and lesion diversity. These similarities suggest that missingness was likely random and unlikely to introduce meaningful selection bias.

Table 1 summarises demographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables. The cohort was predominantly male (89.8%), with a mean age of 52.3 years (SD: 11.5). Educational attainment varied: 40.8% had primary school education, 16.9% completed high school, and 42.3% had a college-level education. A majority of participants reported histories of alcohol consumption (82.3%), betel quid chewing (78.4%), and cigarette smoking (85.6%).

Table 1.

Demographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics of the TWOPMD-1 cohort.

Variable No MT (%) MT to OSCC (%) p-value* Total (%)
Number of patients        
  684 (93.2) 50 (6.8)   734
Age (year)     0.031 #  
 Mean (SD) 52.1 (11.6) 55.1 (9.0)   52.3 (11.5)
Follow-up (day)     0.080 #  
 Mean (SD) 899.8 (961.1) 702.1 (741.3)   886.4 (948.6)
Gender     0.816  
 Male 610 (93.1) 45 (6.9)   655 (89.8)
 Female 70 (94.6) 4 (5.4)   74 (10.2)
Education     0.05  
 Primary school 269 (90.6) 28 (9.4)   297 (40.8)
 High school 118 (95.9) 5 (4.1)   123 (16.9)
 College 292 (94.8) 16 (5.2)   308 (42.3)
Alcohol drinking     0.849  
 Never 119 (92.2) 10 (7.8)   129 (17.7)
 Occasional + Former 285 (93.8) 19 (6.2)   304 (41.8)
 Current 275 (93.2) 20 (6.8)   295 (40.5)
Betel quid chewing     0.256  
 Never 151 (96.2) 6 (3.8)   157 (21.6)
 Occasional + Former 352 (92.4) 29 (7.6)   381 (52.4)
 Ever 175 (92.6) 14 (7.4)   189 (26.0)
Cigarette smoking     0.873  
 Never 97 (92.4) 8 (7.6)   105 (14.4)
 Ever 127 (94.1) 8 (5.9)   135 (18.6)
 Current 454 (93.2) 33 (6.8)   487 (67.0)
Lesion focality     0.006  
 Unifocal 278 (96.5) 10 (3.5)   288 (39.2)
 Multifocal 406 (91) 40 (9)   446 (60.8)
Lesion diversity     0.001  
 Uniform 458 (95.6) 21 (4.4)   479 (65.3)
 Multiform 225 (88.6) 29 (11.4)   254 (34.7)
Fibrosis (mouth opening)     0.042  
 No 481 (94.9) 26 (5.1)   507 (69.2)
 Mild 113 (91.1) 11 (8.9)   124 (16.9)
 Moderate 31 (83.8) 6 (16.2)   37 (5.0)
 Severe 10 (90.9) 1 (9.1)   11 (1.5)
 Unknown 48 (88.9) 6 (11.1)   54 (7.4)
Dysplasia     0.001  
 No 124 (97.6) 3 (2.4)   127 (17.4)
 Yes 404 (90.4) 43 (9.6)   447 (61.2)
 No biopsy 152 (97.4) 4 (2.6)   156 (21.4)
Oral Candida level     2.5×10−4  
 Low (0-50 CFU) 416 (96.1) 17 (3.9)   433 (59.0)
 High (>50 CFU) 98 (86) 16 (14)   114 (15.5)
 (Unknown) 170 (90.9) 17 (9.1)   187 (25.5)
Major lesion subtype     3.5×10−5  
 Only leukoplakia§ 333 (96.8) 11 (3.2)   344 (46.9)
 OSF/VH 195 (87.1) 29 (12.9)   224 (30.5)
 Others 156 (94) 10 (6)   166 (22.6)
Treatment modality     0.112  
 No medication/CO2 laser 157 (96.3) 6 (3.7)   163 (22.4)
 Biopsy/reconstruction 521 (92.4) 43 (7.6)   564 (77.6)

*p-values are from Chi-square test unless otherwise specified; p < 0.05 are in bold.

#

p-values from t-tests.

§

Patients with leukoplakia (uniform) only.

Patients not in the category of ‘only leukoplakia’ or ‘OSF/VH’.

Clinically, 60.8% of patients presented with multifocal lesions, and 34.7% had multiform lesions. The most common OPMD subtypes were leukoplakia (46.9%), while 30.5% of patients had OSF or VH, both considered high-risk subtypes. Dysplasia was present in 61.2% of patients, absent in 17.4%, and unassessed in 21.4% due to unavailable biopsy samples.

Quantification of Candida colonisation among the cohort revealed that 433 patients (59.0%) had low colonisation, 114 (15.5%) had high colonisation, and 187 (25.5%) had unknown status.

Over a mean follow-up of 2.4 (SD, 2.6) years, 50 patients (6.8%) developed OSCC. The occurrence of MT to OSCC varied across clinical and lifestyle factors. OSCC occurred in 9% of patients with multifocal lesions compared to 3.5% with unifocal lesions, and in 11.4% of those with multiform lesions versus 4.4% with uniform lesions. Similarly, dysplastic lesions were more likely to progress (9.6%) than non-dysplastic ones (2.4%). Regarding OPMD subtype, the highest OSCC risk was observed in patients with high-risk subtypes (OSF/VH), at 12.9%, versus 3.2% in those with leukoplakia alone. In terms of Candida burden, 14.0% of participants with high oral Candida albicans levels developed OSCC, versus 3.9% of those with lower levels. These unadjusted comparisons were used to identify candidate predictors and are followed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate independent associations with time to OSCC, adjusting for potential confounders.

Oral Candida albicans load associates with MT in patients with OPMD

Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between clinical, microbial, and lifestyle factors and the risk of MT in the TWOPMD-1 cohort. As shown in the left panel of Table 2, univariate Cox regression revealed that high oral Candida burden was strongly associated with progression to OSCC. Patients with high fungal load (>50 CFU) were nearly five times more likely to undergo MT compared to those with low-level Candida colonisation (crude HR = 4.10; 95% CI, 2.07–8.13; p < 0.001). Lesion characteristics were also showed strong associations with MT risk. Multiform lesions (crude HR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.31–4.03; p = 0.004) and multifocal lesions (crude HR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.02–4.08; p = 0.045) both conferred higher risk. Similarly, moderate-to-severe fibrosis (crude HR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.20–3.64; p = 0.01) and the presence of dysplasia (crude HR = 3.59; 95% CI: 1.11–11.59; p = 0.032) were significant predictors. Among lesion subtypes, patients diagnosed with OSF or VH had a fourfold increased risk of MT compared with those with leukoplakia alone (crude HR3.73; 95% CI: 1.86–7.46; p < 0.001). Of the lifestyle factors assessed, only betel quid chewing showed a suggestive association (crude HR = 2.28; 95% CI: 0.88–5.93; p = 0.091); neither alcohol consumption nor cigarette smoking were significantly associated with MT.

Table 2.

Cox regression analysis of factors associated with MT in OPMD.

Model Univariate
Multivariable#
Variable HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
Age (year)        
  1.02 (0.99-1.05) 0.114    
Education        
 Primary school Reference      
 High school 0.57 (0.31-1.05) 0.071    
 College 0.47 (0.18-1.22) 0.12    
Alcohol drinking        
 Never Reference      
 Occasional/Former 0.82 (0.38-1.77) 0.615    
 Current 0.91 (0.42-1.94) 0.803    
Betel quid chewing        
 Never Reference      
 Occasional/Former 1.85 (0.77-4.45) 0.171    
 Current 2.28 (0.88-5.93) 0.091    
Cigarette smoking        
 Never Reference      
 Ever 0.72 (0.27-1.93) 0.52    
 Current 0.83 (0.38-1.8) 0.64    
Lesion focality        
 Unifocal Reference   Reference  
 Multifocal 2.04 (1.02-4.08) 0.045 2.25 (1.04-4.90) 0.045
Lesion diversity        
 Uniform Reference   Reference  
 Multiform 2.3 (1.31-4.03) 0.004 0.57 (0.25-1.31) 0.185
Fibrosis        
 No Reference      
 Yes 2.09 (1.2-3.64) 0.01    
Dysplasia        
 No Reference   Reference  
 Yes 3.59 (1.11-11.59) 0.032 2.87 (0.86-9.60) 0.087
 No biopsy 0.76 (0.17-3.38) 0.713 0.63 (0.14-2.90) 0.556
Oral Candida level        
 Low (0-50 CFU) Reference 0.04 Reference  
 High (>51 CFU) 4.1 (2.07-8.13) 5.1 × 10−5 2.84 (1.40-5.75) 0.004
 Unknown 2.53 (1.29-4.96) 0.007 2.69 (1.37-5.28) 0.004
Lesion subtype        
 Only leukoplakia§ Reference   Reference  
 OSF/VH 3.73 (1.86-7.46) 2.0 × 10−4 3.99 (1.54-10.38) 0.005
 Others 1.97 (0.83-4.63) 0.122 2.83 (1.06-7.56) 0.038
Treatment        
 No medication/CO2 laser Reference      
 Biopsy/reconstruction 2.58 (1.1-6.06) 0.030    

Note: N = 734 (univariate); N = 730 (multivariable, due to missing data).

p-values < 0.05 are in bold.

#

Covariates for maultivariabe analysis included lesion focality, lesion diversity, dysplasia, oral Candidia level, and lesion subtype.

§

Patients with leukoplakia (uniform) only.

Patients not in the categories of ‘only leukoplakia’ or ‘OSF/VH’.

To identify independent predictors of MT, we conducted multivariable Cox regression modelling informed by both clinical relevance and statistical performance. Starting with an eight-variable model based on univariate associations, we applied stepwise selection using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to aid in model refinement. This process resulted in a five-variable model including lesion multifocality, lesion diversity, Candida albicans burden, dysplasia, and lesion subtype (Table 2, right panel). Although AIC supported their inclusion, final model interpretation prioritised clinical importance, not model fit alone. To ensure the robustness of this multivariable model, we assessed multicollinearity among predictors using the variance inflation factor (VIF), all of which ranged from 1.08 to 2.65, well below the conventional threshold of 5, indicating no evidence of problematic collinearity (Supplementary Table S3).

In the final multivariable model, both high Candida burden (adjusted HR [aHR] = 2.84; 95% CI: 1.40–5.75; P = 0.004) and the lesions of OSF/VH (aHR = 3.99; 95% CI: 1.54–10.38; P = 0.005) remained independently associated with MT. As a sensitivity analysis, we repeated the multivariable model excluding patients with unknown Candida level (N = 543; Supplement Table S4). Results remained robust: high Candida burden (aHR = 2.86; 95% CI: 1.39–5.87; P = 0.004) and OSF/VH subtype (aHR = 5.01; 95% CI: 1.42–17.67; P = 0.012) continued to show strong associations. Although the reduced sample size led to wider confidence intervals, the directionality of effects was consistent for lesion multifocality and dysplasia. Collectively, these findings highlight high Candida albicans burden as an independent and biologically plausible risk factor for MT in patients with OPMD. Importantly, this association persisted across analytic approaches and was not driven by missing data, reinforcing its relevance in risk stratification.

Interaction between Candida albicans and OPMD subtype on MT risk

As shown in Figure 1, Kaplan–Meier curves revealed divergent patterns of accumulative incidence of MT stratified by both oral Candida burden and OPMD subtype. These findings prompted further investigation into potential effect modification. To formally test whether the impact of Candida load on transformation risk varied across OPMD subtypes, we extended the multivariable Cox regression model to include an interaction term between Candida burden and lesion subtype (Table 3). The model adjusted for lesion focality, lesion diversity, and dysplasia, and used patients with only leukoplakia and low Candida levels as the reference group.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Divergent risk of MT by Candida albicans burden and OPMD subtype. Kaplan–Meier curves illustrating the cumulative probability of MT among patients with OPMD, stratified by Candida albicans burden (low vs. high) and lesion subtype. Analysis includes patients with available data on both variables (n = 547). The panels display survival trajectories for patients with leukoplakia (top left), OSF/VH (bottom left), other OPMD subtypes (top right), and the overall cohort (bottom right). Higher Candida burden was associated with increased risk in leukoplakia and other subtypes, while OSF/VH demonstrated elevated risk regardless of fungal load. HRs and 95% CIs were estimated using log-rank test for each comparison.

Table 3.

Multivariable Cox regression incorporating interaction between Candida albicans burden and OPMD subtype.

Variable HR (95% CI) p-value
Lesion focality    
 Unifocal Reference  
 Multifocal 2.43 (1.12-5.26) 0.026
Lesion diversity    
 Uniform Reference  
 Multiform 0.52 (0.23-1.15) 0.114
Dysplasia    
 No Reference  
 Yes 2.86 (0.85-9.58) 0.09
 No biopsy 0.59 (0.13-2.62) 0.502
Oral Candida level    
 Low (0-50 CFU) Reference  
 High (>51 CFU) 13.83 (2.42-79.06) 0.004
 Unknown 7.55 (1.54-37.11) 0.014
Lesion subtype    
 Only leukoplakia§ Reference  
 OSF/VH 13.67 (2.66-70.20) 0.002
 Others 5.69 (0.91-35.36) 0.066
Interaction    
 Candida low × leukoplakia Reference  
 Candida high × OSF/VH 0.11 (0.01-0.83) 0.029
 Candida unknown × OSF/VH 0.27 (0.04-1.86) 0.161
 Candida high × other lesions 0.5 (0.05-4.57) 0.567
 Candida unknown × other lesions 0.3 (0.03-2.8) 0.30

Note: N = 730 (as in multivariable model in Table 2).

Statistically significant hazard ratios (95% CI not crossing 1.00) are presented in bold.

§

Patients with leukoplakia (uniform) only.

Patients not in the categories of ‘only leukoplakia’ or ‘OSF/VH’.

In this interaction model, both high Candida burden (aHR = 13.83; 95% CI: 2.42–79.06; P = 0.004) and the presence of OSF/VH lesions (aHR = 13.67; 95% CI: 2.66–70.60; P = 0.002) were independently associated with significantly increased risk of MT. Notably, the interaction term between high Candida burden and OSF/VH subtype was negative and statistically significant (aHR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01–0.83; P = 0.029), suggesting an attenuated combined effect compared to the expected multiplicative risk. This sub-multiplicative property implies a less-than-additive, possibly antagonistic interaction: although each factor independently conferred substantial risk, their combination did not result in a proportionally higher hazard. Nonetheless, the estimated cumulative hazard for patients with concurrent OSF/VH and high Candida load remained markedly elevated (combined HR = 20.8) relative to the reference group.

Interaction terms involving other lesion types or unknown Candida status were not statistically significant, though effect directions were consistent with attenuation. Taken together, these findings indicate that the prognostic impact of Candida albicans is context-dependent and most pronounced in otherwise lower-risk lesions such as leukoplakia and possibly moderated by the underlying tissue microenvironment in higher-risk subtypes.

Stratified Cox regression by OPMD subtype confirms context-dependent Candida risk

To further evaluate the subtype-specific impact of Candida albicans colonisation on MT, we conducted stratified Cox regression analyses within each major OPMD subtype (Table 4). Among patients with leukoplakia only (n = 344), high Candida burden was strongly associated with increased risk of MT (crude HR = 12.19; 95% CI: 2.12–70.12; P = 0.006). Even among those with unknown Candida status, the risk was moderately elevated (HR = 6.14; 95% CI: 1.27–29.61; P = 0.026).

Table 4.

Stratified Cox regression analysis of Candida albicans burden and risk of MT by OPMD subtype.

OPMD subtype N Candida Level HR (95% CI) p-value
Only leukoplakia 344 Low Reference  
High 12.19 (2.12-70.12) 0.006
Unknown 6.14 (1.27-29.61) 0.026
OSF/VH 224 Low Reference
1.83 (0.76-4.44)
2.22 (0.88-5.57)

0.175
0.085
High
Unknown
Others 166 Low Reference
8.16 (1.78-37.45)

0.006
High
Unknown 2.73 (0.56-13.29) 0.219

Note: Stratified Cox models were fit separately within each OPMD subtype to assess the effect of Candida burden. HRs are relative to the reference group of low Candida burden within each subtype. p-values < 0.05 are in bold.

In contrast, among patients with OSF/VH group (n = 224), neither high Candida burden (HR = 1.83; 95% CI: 0.76–4.44; P = 0.175) nor unknown status (HR = 2.22; 95% CI: 0.88–5.57; P = 0.085) reached statistical significance. However, in the subgroup of other OPMD subtypes (n = 166), high Candida levels again conferred a significantly increased risk of MT (HR = 8.16; 95% CI: 1.78–37.45; P = 0.006), indicating that the influence of Candida burden extends beyond leukoplakia.

These stratified findings align with the interaction model, reinforcing that the prognostic impact of Candida albicans is context dependent. Its effect appears most pronounced in patients with lower-risk epithelial lesions, such as leukoplakia or other non-OSF/VH subtypes, where fungal overgrowth may serve as a co-factor in carcinogenesis. The absence of a significant association in the OSF/VH group may reflect distinct pathogenic mechanisms driving cancer risk in these high-risk lesions. Together, these results support the role of Candida albicans as a potential biomarker of malignant potential in select OPMD contexts.

Association between Candida burden and OPMD subtypes

To further explore the relationship between Candida colonisation and specific OPMD subtypes, we performed chi-square test and logistic regression. Chi-square analysis showed that patients with OSF or VH lesions had a significantly higher prevalence of high Candida colonisation compared to those with other subtypes (p < 0.001, Supplementary Table S5). To further evaluate the direction and strength of this association, we performed two complementary logistic regression models (Supplementary Table S6). The first model assessed whether the presence of OSF/VH lesions predicted high Candida burden, while the second examined whether patients with high Candida colonisation had increased odds of OSF/VH lesions. Both models yielded concordant results, showing a consistent twofold association between OSF/VH lesions and high Candida levels (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.65–3.94; p < 0.001). This suggests a statistically robust association between Candida colonisation and high-risk lesion types.

However, our stratified Cox regression and interaction analyses revealed that this association did not translate into an amplified MT risk in OSF/VH cases. Taken together, while OSF/VH and Candida colonisation are more likely to co-occur, their co-presence does not appear to drive MT synergistically. Rather, Candida colonisation may act as a context-specific biomarker of malignant potential, particularly in patients with lower-risk lesions such as leukoplakia, where its prognostic effect is most pronounced.

Discussion

This multicenter, prospective cohort study demonstrates that high oral colonisation by C. albicans is independently associated with risk of MT in patients with OPMD. Notably, this risk is not uniform across lesion types but appears context-dependent, with the strongest association observed in patients with leukoplakia, lesions typically considered to carry a lower baseline risk. These findings suggest that C. albicans colonisation may serve as a biomarker of malignant potential in select epithelial contexts.

Our results align with prior experimental and observational studies implicating C. albicans in epithelial dysregulation and carcinogenesis via nitrosamine production, epithelial invasion, and pro-inflammatory signalling [18,22,30,31]. However, this is one of the first large-scale, prospective studies to quantify oral fungal burden and demonstrate its prognostic value using culture-based methods. The association between fungal load and MT remained robust after adjusting for conventional clinical predictors, including dysplasia and lesion subtype.

Stratified and interaction analyses further refined this relationship. High C. albicans was strongly predictive of MT in leukoplakia and ‘other’ OPMD subtypes, but not in OSF or VH. This attenuation in high-risk lesions may reflect their distinct histological architecture: subepithelial fibrosis and hyperkeratosis in OSF/VH may limit microbial penetration, immune surveillance, or epithelial response [32,33]. These structural barriers may restrict Candida invasion or blunt its pathogenic interaction with basal epithelial layers. In contrast, the relatively permeable epithelial structure of leukoplakia may be more susceptible to fungal invasion and carcinogenic byproduct exposure, amplifying fungal influence on dysplastic progression.

Interestingly, while alcohol use, betel quid chewing, and cigarette smoking are well-established carcinogens, none were independently associated with MT in multivariable models; this is consistent with prior research suggesting their role may be more prominent in carcinogenesis initiation than progression [12,34]. Our own prior murine study demonstrated that C. albicans alone was not tumorigenic but significantly enhanced tumour development when combined with arecoline and 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO) [35]. These findings, supported by additional fungal–carcinogen models [36,37] support a promoter role for C. albicans, whereby fungal colonisation amplifies the effects of chemical carcinogens rather than acting as a standalone initiator.

We also observed that fungal burden correlated with certain lifestyle exposures, being higher among betel quid chewers and smokers, but lower in alcohol users (Supplementary Table S5). These trends may reflect mucosal disruption and inflammatory priming from tobacco and areca nut use [8,38,39], or microbiome-modulating effects of alcohol [40,41]. However, alcohol’s known role in acetaldehyde-mediated carcinogenesis precludes any interpretation of protection [23,42]. Similarly, the nonsignificant hazard ratio for current smoking likely reflects limited statistical power rather than a lack of biological effect.

Bidirectional logistic regression confirmed a strong association between OSF/VH lesions and high C. albicans burden. However, this does not imply that Candida plays a more dominant role in the malignant transformation among this subgroup compared to other OPMDs, as interaction analysis revealed that both high Candida burden and OSF/VH status were independently associated with elevated MT risk, and the interaction term between these two factors was attenuating (aHR = 0.11), indicating that their effects are additive rather than synergistic. These findings raise the intriguing possibility of a mutually reinforcing relationship: the altered stromal and epithelial environment characteristic of OSF/VH may favour persistent Candida colonisation, which in turn may contribute to chronic inflammation or lesion persistence. Yet, in these lesions, the interaction may contribute to the pathogenesis or persistence of OSF/VH without further amplifying their already elevated risk of malignant transformation. Therefore, caution is warranted when interpreting co-occurrence as evidence of interaction.

Limitations

This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. As an observational cohort study, it cannot establish causal relationships between Candida albicans colonisation and malignant transformation. The assessment of fungal burden was based on a single baseline measurement, which may not fully reflect temporal dynamics in colonisation. Transient colonisation could have been misclassified as low burden, while persistent high-level colonisation may have gone undetected. Moreover, strain-level differences in C. albicans, which may influence pathogenicity, were not assessed.

Although participants with prior antifungal use were excluded at baseline, we did not systematically track antifungal or antibiotic treatments during follow-up. Other unmeasured factors such as oral hygiene practices, diet, systemic health, or immune status could also have influenced colonisation patterns or confounded the observed associations. While major known risk factors were adjusted for, the possibility of residual confounding remains.

Missing data is another consideration, as approximately 25% of participants lacked Candida burden data. To avoid bias related to likely non-random missingness, we treated these cases as a separate ‘unknown’ group rather than performing imputation. While this approach preserved the sample size, it may have influenced precision.

The threshold used to define ‘high’ Candida burden was derived from the observed data distribution within our cohort, which may limit generalisability to other populations. Nonetheless, sensitivity analyses using alternative CFU cutoffs yielded similar trends, suggesting internal robustness of the findings.

Precision in subgroup analyses was limited, particularly in the leukoplakia subgroup, where small event counts resulted in wide confidence intervals. These estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution.

Additionally, although the chromogenic agar medium can differentiate between Candida species [43], nearly all colonies in this study were morphologically consistent with C. albicans, and species-level confirmation was not performed. Lesion location and surface morphology were also not included in multivariable models due to the risk of overfitting with limited events.

Finally, the cohort was predominantly male and derived from a Taiwanese high-risk population, which may limit the applicability of findings to other demographic or geographic groups. Future research with serial fungal monitoring, strain-level identification, broader demographic inclusion, and more comprehensive microbiome analysis will be necessary to validate and refine these observations.

Conclusions

In conclusion, high Candida albicans burden is an independent and context-dependent risk factor for malignant transformation in OPMD. Its strongest prognostic value was observed in clinically lower-risk subtypes such as leukoplakia, underscoring its potential as a subtype-sensitive biomarker. Incorporating fungal profiling into routine evaluation of OPMD may improve individualised risk stratification and inform targeted surveillance and prevention strategies in oral cancer care.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material

Supplementary_Tables clean

Supplementary material

Supplementary Methods

Acknowledgements

We acknowledged the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan and National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan for supporting this study.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan under the grant MOHW111-TDU-B-221-114012 and by National Science and Technology Council under the grant 113-2740-B-400-005.

Supplemental material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2025.2598743.

Author contributions

Conceptualisation, S.S.J., Y.-W.C., S.-G.S., I.-S.C., C.-Y.Y., and K.-J.L.; Formal analysis, F.-Y.T., L.-H.C., C.-H.C., and I.-S.C.; Investigation, S.S.J., C.-H.C., Y.-P.H., T.-T.C., J.-J.L., M.-K.C., Y.-T.L., S.-F.Y., C.-Y.C., W.-L.W., C.-C.W., T.-T.H., I.-C.C., P.-H.W., Y.-C.C., Y.-W.C., S.-G.S., L.-H.C., I.-S.C., C.-Y.Y., and K.-J.L.; Resources, S.S.J., Y.-P.H., T.-T.C., J.-J.L., M.-K.C., Y.-T.L., S.-F.Y., C.-Y.C., W.-L.W., C.-C.W., T.-T.H., I.-C.C., P.-H.W., Y.-C.C., Y.-W.C., S.-G.S., I.-S.C., C.-Y.Y., and K.-J.L.; Data curation and interpretation, I.-C.C., Y.-C.C., P.-H.W., Y.-P.H., T.-T.C., J.-J.L., M.-K.C., Y.-T.L., S.-F.Y., C.-Y.C., W.-L.W., C.-C.W., T.-T.H., F.-Y.T., C.-H.C., Y.-W.C., C.-Y.Y., and K.-J.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.S.J., C.-H.C., and F.-Y.T.; Writing—review and editing, all authors; Supervision, C.-Y.Y., and K.-J.L.; Project administration, I.-C.C., Y.-C.C., C.-Y.Y., and K.-J.L.; Funding acquisition, K.-J.L., and S.S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the manuscript and accept full responsibility for its content.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval granted by the Institutional Review Board of National Health Research Institutes (EC1040509-E and EC1101004), National Taiwan University Hospital (201612072RINB and 202203070RSPC), National Cheng Kung University Hospital (A-ER-103-363), Show Chwan Memorial Hospital (1051104 and 1110402), Changhua Christian Hospital (220504), Chi Mei Medical Centre (10401-007), Chung Shan Medical University Hospital (CS15065), and E-Da Hospital (EMRP19111N). All individuals provided their informed consent prior to participation in this study.

References

  • [1].Tan Y, Wang Z, Xu M, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinomas: state of the field and emerging directions. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15:44. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00249-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Jhuang JR, Su SY, Chiang CJ, et al. Forecast of peak attainment and imminent decline after 2017 of oral cancer incidence in men in Taiwan. Sci Rep. 2022;12:5726. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09736-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. Cancer Registry Annual Report, 2017. Taipei: Health Promotion Administration. [cited 2025 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.hpa.gov.tw/EngPages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=1061&pid=6069 [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Ali J, Sabiha B, Jan HU, et al. Genetic etiology of oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2017;70:23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Gasche JA, Goel A. Epigenetic mechanisms in oral carcinogenesis. Future Oncol. 2012;8:1407–1425. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Ghantous Y, Schussel JL, Brait M. Tobacco and alcohol-induced epigenetic changes in oral carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2018;30:152–158. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Warnakulasuriya S, Chen THH. Areca nut and oral cancer: evidence from studies conducted in humans. J Dent Res. 2022;101:1139–1146. doi: 10.1177/00220345221092751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Warnakulasuriya S. Oral potentially malignant disorders: A comprehensive review on clinical aspects and management. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104550. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Chiu SF, Ho CH, Chen YC, et al. Malignant transformation of oral potentially malignant disorders in Taiwan: An observational nationwide population database study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e24934. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Chuang SL, Wang CP, Chen MK, et al. Malignant transformation to oral cancer by subtype of oral potentially malignant disorder: A prospective cohort study of Taiwanese nationwide oral cancer screening program. Oral Oncol. 2018;87:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Wang YY, Tail YH, Wang WC, et al. Malignant transformation in 5071 southern Taiwanese patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:99. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Chiang WF, Liu SY, Lin JF, et al. Malignant development in patients with oral potentially malignant disorders detected through nationwide screening: Outcomes of 5-year follow-up at a single hospital. Head Neck. 2020;42:67–76. doi: 10.1002/hed.25973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Hsue SS, Wang WC, Chen CH, et al. Malignant transformation in 1458 patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders: a follow-up study based in a Taiwanese hospital. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36:25–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00491.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Speight PM, Khurram SA, Kujan O. Oral potentially malignant disorders: risk of progression to malignancy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:612–627. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Wang TY, Chiu YW, Chen YT, et al. Malignant transformation of Taiwanese patients with oral leukoplakia: A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117:374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Tang JA, Amadio G, Ridge JA. Clinical and histologic features associated with malignant transformation of oral cavity dysplasia managed at a single north american institution. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;148:28–34. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.2755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Alnuaimi AD, Wiesenfeld D, O'Brien-Simpson NM, et al. Oral Candida colonization in oral cancer patients and its relationship with traditional risk factors of oral cancer: a matched case-control study. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].McCullough M, Jaber M, Barrett AW, et al. Oral yeast carriage correlates with presence of oral epithelial dysplasia. Oral Oncol. 2002;38:391–393. doi: 10.1016/S1368-8375(01)00079-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Sankari SL, Mahalakshmi K, Kumar VN. A comparative study of Candida species diversity among patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13:488. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05336-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Ayuningtyas NF, Mahdani FY, Pasaribu TAS, et al. Role of Candida albicans in oral carcinogenesis. Pathophysiology. 2022;29:650–662. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology29040051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Di Cosola M, Cazzolla AP, Charitos IA, et al. Candida albicans and Oral Carcinogenesis. a brief review. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7:476. doi: 10.3390/jof7060476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Gainza-Cirauqui ML, Nieminen MT, Novak Frazer L, et al. Production of carcinogenic acetaldehyde by Candida albicans from patients with potentially malignant oral mucosal disorders. J Oral Pathol Med. 2013;42:243–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2012.01203.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].G M, Ravi SSS, Maheswary D, et al. Role of Candida albicans in chronic inflammation and the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy. 2025;3:402–410. doi: 10.1016/j.cpt.2025.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Vadovics M, Ho J, Igaz N, et al. Candida albicans Enhances the progression of oral squamous cell Carcinoma In Vitro and In Vivo. mBio. 2021;13:e0314421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Guiver M, Levi K, Oppenheim BA. Rapid identification of candida species by TaqMan PCR. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:362–366. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.5.362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J, et al. Applied Linear Statistical Models. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • [29].O'Brien RM. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity. 2007;41:673–690. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Deeiam K, Pankam J, Sresumatchai V, et al. Presence of Candida and its associated factors in participants attending oral cancer screening in the lower northeastern area of Thailand. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:527. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03198-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Krogh P, Hald B, Holmstrup P. Possible mycological etiology of oral mucosal cancer: catalytic potential of infecting Candida albicans and other yeasts in production of N-nitrosobenzylmethylamine. Carcinogenesis. 1987;8:1543–1548. doi: 10.1093/carcin/8.10.1543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Muller S. Oral epithelial dysplasia, atypical verrucous lesions and oral potentially malignant disorders: focus on histopathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:591–602. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Tilakaratne WM, Klinikowski MF, Saku T, et al. Oral submucous fibrosis: review on aetiology and pathogenesis. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Cai X, Zhang J, Han Y, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram prediction model for malignant transformation of oral potentially malignant disorders. Oral Oncol. 2021;123:105619. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Lee CH, Hung PF, Liu KJ, et al. LDOC1 suppresses microbe-induced production of IL-1beta in human normal and cancerous oral cells through the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta axis. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:3148. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Wang X, Wu S, Wu W, et al. Candida albicans promotes oral cancer via IL-17A/IL-17RA-macrophage axis. mBio. 2023;14:e0044723. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00447-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Wang X, Xu T, Wu S, et al. Candida albicans-myeloid cells-T lymphocytes axis in the tumor microenvironment of oral tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Lett. 2024;588:216814. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Chattopadhyay I, Verma M, Panda M. Role of oral microbiome signatures in diagnosis and prognosis of oral cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819867354. doi: 10.1177/1533033819867354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Smedra A, Berent J. The influence of the oral microbiome on oral cancer: a literature review and a new approach. Biomolecules. 2023;13:815. doi: 10.3390/biom13050815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Fan X, Peters BA, Jacobs EJ, et al. Drinking alcohol is associated with variation in the human oral microbiome in a large study of American adults. Microbiome. 2018;6:59. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0448-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].O'Grady I, O'Sullivan J. Alcohol consumption modulates Candida albicans-induced oral carcinogenesis and progression. J Oral Biosci. 2023;65:293–304. doi: 10.1016/j.job.2023.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Yokoyama A, Kamada Y, Imazeki H, et al. Effects of ADH1B and ALDH2 genetic polymorphisms on alcohol elimination rates and salivary acetaldehyde levels in intoxicated Japanese alcoholic men. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40:1241–1250. doi: 10.1111/acer.13073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Eraso E, Moragues MD, Villar-Vidal M, et al. Evaluation of the new chromogenic medium Candida ID 2 for isolation and identification of Candida albicans and other medically important Candida species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3340–3345. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00213-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

Supplementary_Tables clean

Supplementary material

Supplementary Methods


Articles from Journal of Oral Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES