Skip to main content
International Dental Journal logoLink to International Dental Journal
. 2025 Nov 29;76(1):109296. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.109296

Digital Dentistry in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review of Current Capabilities and Future Directions

Walter Yu Hang Lam a,#,, Zhaoting Ling a,#, Kaijing Mao a, Ji-Man Park b, Amirali Zandinejad c,d, Adriana da Fonte Porto Carreiro e, Francesco Guido Mangano f, Jeffrey A Platt g, Falk Schwendicke h
PMCID: PMC12718165  PMID: 41319579

Abstract

Digital technologies are transforming oral healthcare by enhancing prevention, diagnostics, treatment, and maintenance procedures. However, few comprehensive reviews have synthesized their clinical applications across dental disciplines. This scoping review maps the clinical applications of digital dentistry and informed the development of a 2025 FDI Policy Statement that will guide stakeholders in recognizing both significant advances and ongoing challenges. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified 407 eligible articles. Applications clustered into 2 domains: Disease prevention and diagnosis – preventive dentistry (n = 39), cariology (n = 26), and periodontology (n = 16), and Management of disease consequences and patient care – prosthodontics (n = 127), oral and maxillofacial surgery (n = 112), orthodontics (n = 26), and perioperative management (n = 61). Digital dentistry encompasses artificial intelligence, computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technologies, computer-assisted surgery systems, digital imaging, teledentistry, and related devices and systems. Evidence supporting digital applications should be critically evaluated, and professional judgment must remain central to patient care. Advancing the field will require more standardized, high‑quality data and clinical research to establish robust evidence of real‑world impact.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Computer-aided design, Computer-aided manufacturing, Digital technology, Digital health, Three-dimensional imaging

Introduction

The introduction of computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology into prosthodontics in the 1970s marked a pivotal advance in dental practice and paved the way for contemporary digital dentistry.1 Early applications enabled the fabrication of crowns using workflows that began with optical impressions and concluded with automated milling.2 Over subsequent decades, ongoing technological innovation and the integration of digital tools have transformed digital dentistry into an essential component of modern care. Reflecting this progress, the International Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research (IADR) established the Digital Dentistry Research Network in 2022 to advance research in this rapidly evolving field. Likewise, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), through Technical Committee (TC) 106 (Dentistry), Subcommittee 9, has promoted the standardization of dental CAD-CAM systems. Moreover, an international group of clinicians and researchers founded the Digital Dentistry Society, which aims to promote and advance the science and practice of digital dentistry.

Digital dentistry broadly refers to the application of digital technologies to address oral health challenges, as outlined in World Health Organization (WHO) publications.3,4 Today, it encompasses a wide array of innovations, including digital scanners and imaging tools, CAD-CAM systems, computer-assisted surgery, mobile health applications, and, more recently, artificial intelligence (AI). These technologies have transformed dental practice by improving accuracy, expediting treatment, enhancing communication, enabling greater customization, supporting more predictable planning, and optimizing patient care.5, 6, 7, 8

Despite these advances, integrating digital dentistry into routine care remains challenging and should be evidence-based, outcome-driven, high quality, patient-centred, ethical, fair, and inclusive. Robust governance and clear legal and regulatory frameworks must safeguard privacy and data security while enabling safe collection, storage, and responsible access to data for care, research, and innovation; informed consent for primary and secondary data use should be explicit and documented. Data quality is critical – biased or incomplete datasets can undermine performance, especially in AI – so evidence should be critically appraised and supported by standards that ensure quality, safety, effectiveness, interoperability, sustainability, and alignment with primary healthcare and global oral health strategies. Interoperable, user-friendly tools accessible to both providers and patients are essential to promote equity. To avoid overreliance on technology, continuous professional development and comprehensive curricula across undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education should strengthen clinical judgment and responsible patient management. Finally, the rapid pace of innovation can raise costs and limit access, underscoring the need for sustainable, outcome-focused, and equitable adoption.

To address these concerns, the World Dental Federation (FDI) issued a Policy Statement in 2025 to provide guidance for stakeholders on the responsible adoption of digital technologies while minimizing associated risks (https://fdiworlddental.org/digital-dentistry). This scoping review synthesizes the clinical applications of digital dentistry, highlights their value in practice, identifies priorities for future development, and provides an in-depth analysis of current and emerging digital technologies in dentistry.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, was conducted from inception to October 2024 and updated in June 2025, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.9 This review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (reference number: osf.io/6crn9). The search strategy combined keywords related to dentistry, digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and clinical studies.

The search string used was: (dentistry OR dental OR tooth OR teeth OR oral health) AND ((digital) OR (artificial intelligence) OR (machine learning) OR (deep learning) OR (intraoral scanner) OR (facial scanner) OR (CAD) OR (CAM) OR (3D) OR (virtual patient) OR (virtual articulator) OR (digital smile design) OR (mobile) OR (smartphone) OR (teledentistry) OR (computer-aided) OR (computer-assisted) OR (virtual reality)) AND (elderly OR adult OR adolescent OR child OR patient OR participant OR subject). Filters were applied to limit results to clinical study types, including clinical trials, comparative studies, multicentre studies and observational studies.

The inclusion criteria were as follows:

  • 1.

    English-language original articles reporting clinical applications of digital dentistry in humans. Nonclinical articles – such as animal or materials research, surveys and reviews – were excluded.

  • 2.

    Studies unrelated to clinical practice or outcome improvement, including those where digital technologies were used solely for dental education or as measurement tools to evaluate clinical outcomes, were excluded.

  • 3.

    Although digital radiology (including 2D intraoral and panoramic radiographs and 3D cone-beam computed tomography [CBCT]) can be considered part of digital dentistry, this area was excluded as it is already routine in many regions.

Two reviewers (Z.L. and K.M.) independently screened titles and abstracts, and assessed full-text articles for eligibility using the Covidence systematic review software.10 Selection of studies was based on consensus; disagreements were resolved with a third reviewer (W.L.). For each included study, the following data were extracted: general study information (first author, year of publication, country/region, and discipline), study population, interventions (digital technologies used and key applications), and reported outcomes. Included studies were analysed and categorized by dental discipline. Within each discipline, studies were arranged first by the sequence from prevention to diagnosis and risk prediction, then by clinical workflow (eg, planning, treatment, prosthesis fabrication), and finally alphabetically.

Results

The initial database search yielded 5177 articles, which were reduced to 3161 after the removal of duplicates. Title and abstract screening excluded 2370 articles as irrelevant. Of the remaining articles, 384 were excluded after full-text assessment for the following reasons: abstract only/full-text not available (8 articles), non-English language articles (15 articles), not clinical trials (265 articles), or not related to clinical practice or outcome improvement (96 articles). Ultimately, 407 articles were included in the review (Figure 1). The included studies covered a range of dental disciplines and were clustered into 2 domains (Figure 2): (1) disease prevention and diagnosis – preventive dentistry (n = 39),11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 cariology (n = 26),50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75 and periodontology (n = 16)76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91; and (2) management of disease consequences and patient care – prosthodontics (n = 127),92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218 oral and maxillofacial surgery (n = 112),219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330 orthodontics (n = 26),331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356 and perioperative management (n = 61).357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417 Among the included studies, the leading contributing countries were Italy (10%), the United States (9%), and China (9%), followed by India (8%) and Germany (7%).

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Flowchart illustrating the screening process and inclusion of studies in this scoping review.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Distribution of studies across various.

Discussion

Clinical applications of digital dentistry across dental disciplines

Disease prevention and diagnosis

Disease prevention and early diagnosis of oral diseases were prominent, with risk prediction enabling personalized prevention and care. Approximately 20% of the included studies focused on this domain, with notable emphasis on oral health promotion (preventive dentistry) and a particular concentration on 2 major dental diseases: dental decay (cariology) and periodontal diseases (periodontology).

Preventive dentistry

Preventive dentistry – traditionally categorized as primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention – has increasingly incorporated digital technologies.418 Two key technologies – teledentistry and artificial intelligence – have been used across prevention levels. Teledentistry, enabled by the widespread smartphone adoption, uses information and communication technologies to deliver remote care, expand access in rural and geographically disadvantaged areas, and support health promotion, monitoring, and triage.419, 420, 421, 422 Artificial intelligence (AI), defined as the capability of machines to perform intellectual tasks, which traditionally were assumed exclusive to humans,423 enabling risk prediction, early detection from clinical images, and decision support to personalize preventive care. A summary of the 39 included studies is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of digital applications in preventive dentistry (n = 39).

Indications Digital technologies Key applications in studies
Primary prevention Digital imaging (photographs)
  • Visualization of oral hygiene32,33

Teledentistry
  • Mobile applications coupled with toothbrushes28, 29, 30, 31

  • Mobile applications for oral hygiene instruction15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27

  • Reminder messages of oral hygiene practice11, 12, 13, 14

Secondary prevention AI
  • Automatic diagnosis of oral lesions and dental pain40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45

Digital imaging (IOS)
  • Monitoring progression of tooth wear46, 47, 48, 49

Teledentistry
  • Remote diagnosis of common oral conditions34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39

AI, artificial intelligence; IOS, intraoral scanner.

Primary prevention

Primary prevention aims to prevent disease from becoming established by eliminating its causes. In teledentistry, a foundational application is delivering smartphone-based oral hygiene reminders.11, 12, 13, 14 Building on this, mobile applications use multimodal strategies to promote proper oral hygiene and have shown effectiveness across age groups.15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 When integrated with sensor-equipped toothbrushes, these apps can significantly improve brushing behaviours and oral hygiene.28, 29, 30, 31 Longer-term studies are needed to determine whether these digital interventions translate into measurable reductions in disease incidence and prevalence. Digital imaging, including intraoral cameras, further supports primary prevention by enabling personalized visualization of the oral cavity and assessment of oral hygiene.32,33

Secondary prevention

Secondary prevention targets early detection of diseases to enable timely intervention and disease control. Digital imaging and telecommunication support remote sharing of intraoral photographs, radiographs, and video recordings for diagnosis and treatment planning,34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 benefiting individuals with limited mobility or chronic conditions. AI further advances early detection: AI-powered mobile health tools can analyse oral mucosal lesions and other pathologies with diagnostic performance comparable to experienced clinicians.40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 Digital tools also facilitate the monitoring of ongoing conditions – using intraoral scanners (IOS), clinicians can rapidly generate digital models of the dentition to monitor tooth wear progression over time.46, 47, 48, 49

Tertiary prevention

Tertiary prevention focuses on the management and rehabilitation of patients with established dental conditions to restore function and improve quality of life. Related strategies are discussed in the section Management of disease consequence and patient care.

In conclusion, digital technologies – particularly teledentistry and artificial intelligence – are integral to preventive dentistry, supporting primary prevention through digital education and behavior-change tools and enabling secondary prevention through early disease detection and remote monitoring.

Cariology

Digital technologies are increasingly integrated into cariology, with applications in prevention, detection, and risk assessment of dental caries, as summarized in Table 2 (26 articles).

Table 2.

Summary of digital applications in cariology (n = 26).

Indications Digital technologies Key applications in studies
Prevention AI
  • Customized hygiene promotion for caries reduction52

Teledentistry
  • Hygiene promotion for caries reduction50,51

Diagnosis AI
  • Automated diagnosis based on radiographs, photographs and IOS63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72

Teledentistry
Risk prediction AI
  • Caries risk prediction based on demographical and clinical metrics73, 74, 75

AI, artificial intelligence; IOS, intraoral scanner.

Caries prevention

Teledentistry interventions delivering reminder messages and educational content can promote oral health behaviours, resulting in short-term increases in tooth brushing frequency; however, these effects have not been sustained over time and have not effectively prevented caries.50, 51, 52

Caries diagnosis

Teledentistry enables remote caries assessment via intraoral or phone photographs, with accuracy comparable to clinical examination.53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 The integration of AI further enhances the automated detection using intraoral photos, radiographs or digital scans.63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72

Caries risk assessment

AI-driven caries risk assessment models trained on behavioural determinants can predict early childhood caries risk and support targeted personalized preventative recommendations.73, 74, 75

Periodontology

Across the 16 periodontology articles included (Table 3), digital technologies are used to enhance the prevention, detection, monitoring, and management of periodontal disease.

Table 3.

Summary of digital applications in periodontology (n = 16).

Indications Digital technologies Key applications in studies
Prevention Digital imaging (IOS)
  • Gingival inflammation monitoring and hygiene promotion76,77

Detection and diagnosis AI
  • Alveolar bone level detection based on radiographs80, 81, 82, 83

  • Gingivitis detection based on photographs78,79

Electronic periodontal probe
  • Pocket depth measurements84, 85, 86

Risk prediction AI
  • Periodontal disease prediction based on demographical and clinical metrics87, 88, 89, 90, 91

AI, artificial intelligence; IOS, intraoral scanner.

Prevention of periodontal disease

For prevention, IOS captures high-quality, true-colour images that reflect gingival health, demonstrating 90% agreement with clinical assessments of gingival inflammation.76 IOS-derived data can inform personalized hygiene advice and reminder-based interventions which improved bleeding on probing and plaque scores over 6 months.77

Detection and diagnosis of periodontal disease

AI systems trained on photographic and radiographic data can identify gingivitis, quantify alveolar bone loss, and detect intrabony defects, supporting periodontitis staging.78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83 Electronic periodontal probes that apply calibrated pressure achieve less than 0.5 mm deviation relative to manual probing, providing a reliable digital alternative.84, 85, 86

Risk prediction

Machine-learning models leveraging large-scale electronic records have been developed to predict periodontal disease and tooth-loss phenotypes.87, 88, 89, 90, 91 These advancements have the potential to reduce workload and enable data-driven dental care.

Management of disease consequences and patient care

The section focuses on treatment workflows – from digital planning to precision surgery and computer-aided manufacturing – designed to improve outcomes related to disease consequences. These studies account for approximately 80% of the review and span prosthodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, and perioperative management.

Prosthodontics

Digital applications in prosthodontics – including CAD-CAM and digital imaging – enhance accuracy and predictability in prosthesis fabrication and dental rehabilitation.

Computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) systems comprise 3 main components: digital patient data as input, a CAD system for electronic modelling and planning, and a CAM system for automated fabrication of dental appliances.424 CAD systems integrate multiple digital data modalities to create a 3D virtual patient that replicates the aesthetic and functional characteristics of the real patient.425, 426, 427 Intraoral structures can be digitized indirectly by scanning stone casts or directly using IOS.139,428,429 Facial scanners, along with virtual facebows and jaw trackers, capture 3D facial morphology and mandibular movements.430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435 Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables 3-dimensional reconstruction of maxillofacial bone structures.436 A summary of these applications is provided in Table 4 (127 articles).

Table 4.

Summary of digital applications in prosthodontics (n = 127).

Indications Digital technologies Key applications in studies
Treatment planning CAD-CAM and AI
Tooth preparation CAD-CAM
Impression, occlusion and teeth-to-face relationships CAD-CAM
  • Customized impression trays134

Digital imaging
  • Virtual mounting138

Prosthesis fabrication CAD-CAM
Miscellaneous
 Crown lengthening surgery CAD-CAM and CAS
 Shade selection Digital imaging
  • Digital shade selection using IOS103, 104, 105

  • Digital shade selection using smartphone101,102

 Temporomandibular disorder AI
  • Prediction model based on demographic and medical metrics215,216

CAD-CAM
Teledentistry
  • Digital therapeutics consisting of education, self-exercise and monitoring92,93

AI, artificial intelligence; CAD-CAM, computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing; CAS, computer-assisted surgery; IOS, intraoral scanner.

Treatment planning

Advancements in Digital Smile Design (DSD) – integrating intraoral scanning, facial scanning, and CAD – allow clinicians to visualize and plan restorations in 3D, improving predictability and patient communication.94, 95, 96, 97 In CAD systems, restoration morphology can be designed using either the correlation method or the library method.98,99 AI-powered prosthetic design has also emerged, using deep learning algorithms to generate precise and biomimetic restoration morphology.100

Tooth preparation

Tooth preparation benefits from CAD-CAM-generated templates that support precise and controlled tooth reduction.106 In implant prosthodontics, digitally fabricated abutments provide customized solutions for diverse clinical scenarios, with high survival rates and stable peri-implant tissues.107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112,218

Impression, occlusion and teeth-to-face relationships

The shift from conventional to digital impressions reduces distortions associated with impression materials and improves patient comfort. Advances in IOS, including powder-free scanning and faster acquisition, have made them increasingly preferred by clinicians and patients, while maintaining accuracy and restoration quality.113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128

Despite these advantages, digital impressions can be challenging in edentulous patients.129 To address this limitation, alternative methods such as stereophotogrammetry and IOS with auxiliary structures have been introduced.130, 131, 132, 133 Digital methods streamline occlusal records and the establishment of teeth-to-face relationships, achieving outcomes comparable to conventional techniques with reduced adjustment time.134, 135, 136, 137, 138

Prosthesis fabrication

The fabrication process in prosthodontics has shifted from traditional manual techniques to CAD-CAM-based subtractive and additive manufacturing. These digital approaches enhance restoration accuracy, reduce fabrication time, and improve cost-effectiveness for fixed and removable prostheses, including implant-supported restorations.139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209,217

Miscellaneous

3D-printed surgical guides for crown lengthening enable shorter surgery times, improved aesthetic outcomes, and better soft tissue stability.210,211 Tooth shade selection is a critical yet challenging step in prosthodontics. Traditionally, it has been subjective and prone to inconsistencies. Digital methods, including IOS and AI-assisted mobile applications, aim to reduce subjectivity and improve consistency, supporting more predictable aesthetic outcomes.101, 102, 103, 104, 105 Both additively and subtractively manufactured occlusal devices provide comparable therapeutic effects while reducing wear of antagonist teeth as well as device wear.212, 213, 214 AI-driven prediction models have been developed to identify temporomandibular disorders,215,216 and digital therapeutics delivered via mobile applications have shown improved outcomes for patients with temporomandibular disorders.92,93

From shade selection to prosthetic design and fabrication, digital technologies have enhanced restoration precision and longevity while minimizing procedural errors. Continued adoption will further refine prosthodontic workflows, making them more precise, cost-effective, and accessible.

Oral & maxillofacial surgery

The integration of digital technologies – particularly computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and CAD-CAM systems – has enhanced the accuracy and predictability of diverse procedures, as summarized in the 112 articles included in Table 5. CAS encompasses 2 approaches: static computer-assisted surgery (SCAS), which uses a fixed surgical template,437 and dynamic computer-assisted surgery (DCAS) which employs optical motion-tracking for real-time guidance.438, 439, 440, 441

Table 5.

Summary of digital applications in oral & maxillofacial surgery (n = 112).

Indications Digital technologies Key applications in studies
Surgical planning AI
  • Surgical risks prediction based on radiographs and medical metrics221,222

Digital imaging and CAD-CAM
Bone augmentation CAD-CAM
  • 3D-printed bone grafts236

  • 3D-printed meshes237,238

  • Simulation model239, 240, 241

CAS
Dental implantology AI
  • Automated treatment planning249

  • Implant classification based on radiographs250, 251, 252

CAD-CAM
  • Customized endosseous implants253,254

  • Customized healing abutments255, 256, 257, 258

  • Customized subperiosteal implants259,260

CAS
Robot
Dentoalveolar surgery CAS
  • Impacted teeth extractions and eruption228, 229, 230

Maxillofacial surgery CAS
Miscellaneous
 Autotransplantation Digital imaging (CBCT) and CAD-CAM
 Head and neck cancer AI
  • Survival and recurrence prediction based on demographic and medical metrics311,312

CAD-CAM
  • Customized stents for radiotherapy313

 Postsurgery Teledentistry
  • Dentoalveolar surgery aftercare308, 309, 310

 Trigeminal neuralgia CAD-CAM

AI, artificial intelligence; CAD-CAM, computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing; CAS, computer-assisted surgery; CBCT, cone-beam computed tomography.

Surgical planning

High-resolution 3D imaging underpins digital planning, reducing linear and angular errors.223, 224, 225, 226, 227 AI-driven models also assist in predicting surgical risks and postoperative pain accurately in third molar removal.221,222

Bone augmentation

In guided bone regeneration (GBR), CAD-CAM supports planning and the fabrication of surgical guides for localized defects.237, 238, 239, 240, 241 Advances in 3D printing enable customized bone grafts tailored to specific defect morphology.236 Surgeons can also 3D print guides and use dynamic navigation for intraoral block bone grafting, ridge splitting, cyst aspiration, and sinus floor augmentation.242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248

Dental implantology

Both SCAS and DCAS reduce surgical deviations compared with conventional approaches.261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302 Computer-assisted implant placement can lessen the need for bone augmentation procedures and reduce treatment complexity.301 Comparative studies indicate similar postoperative pain and swelling among static, dynamic, and freehand techniques.269,270 Robot-assisted implant placement as an emerging option that can further improve precision,303, 304, 305, 306, 307 though limited tactile feedback may affect the accuracy of self-tapping implant insertion.304 Customized healing abutments improve soft- and hard-tissue preservation postoperatively.255, 256, 257, 258 CAD-CAM systems enable fabrication of custom endosseous and subperiosteal implants for atrophic jaws.253,254,259,260 Deep learning models have also been developed for automated treatment planning and dental implant classification.249, 250, 251, 252

Dentoalveolar surgery

CAS aids precise localization and eruption trajectory control for target teeth, improving accuracy and efficiency. Digital guides and 3D imaging reduce operative time and postoperative pain, and minimize bone removal for extractions and for orthodontic eruption of impacted teeth.228, 229, 230

Maxillofacial surgery

Digital precision extends to maxillofacial surgical procedures.329,330 3D-printed occlusal splints and surgical templates derived from virtual simulation guide osteotomy lines and skeletal movements.322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328 In cleft lip and palate, 3D-printed maxillary models facilitate effective naso-alveolar molding,321 while for fractures and mandibular defect reconstruction, CT-based virtual models and CAD-CAM-customized guides or plates enable precise alignment and stable bone healing.314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320

Miscellaneous

Additional applications include autotransplantation with CBCT replicas for precise socket preparation,231, 232, 233, 234, 235 3D-printed oral stents for radiotherapy protection,313 and personalized templates for minimally invasive trigeminal neuralgia treatment.219,220 Telemedicine has demonstrated effectiveness for postoperative follow-up in dentoalveolar surgery.308, 309, 310 Machine learning models may assist in predicting survival and recurrence risks in oral cancer.311,312

Overall, digital technologies are improving surgical accuracy, efficiency, and consistency in oral and maxillofacial surgery, with corresponding gains in clinical outcomes.

Orthodontics

Teledentistry, AI, and CAD-CAM systems have made substantial contributions to orthodontic care, offering clinicians innovative tools to improve treatment planning and patient communication, as outlined in Table 6 (26 articles).

Table 6.

Summary of digital applications in orthodontics (n = 26).

Indications Digital technologies Key applications in studies
Treatment planning AI
Treatment outcome simulation Digital imaging, CAD-CAM, and AI
Appliances fabrication CAD-CAM
  • Bracket system341

  • Guided bonding devices342,343

  • Orthodontic aligners344

  • Retainers345

  • Space maintainers346

Patient management Teledentistry
Miscellaneous
 Corticotomy CAD-CAM
 Palatal expansion CAS
  • Miniscrew insertion349

AI, artificial intelligence; CAD-CAM, computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing; CAS, computer-assisted surgery.

Treatment planning

AI now supports semi-automatic and fully automated cephalometric analyses.334,335 It has also been leveraged for malocclusion classification using fully convolutional neural network applied to intraoral photographs.336 AI-enhanced diagnostic tools have been associated with shorter treatment times, higher planning accuracy, and higher patient satisfaction compared with traditional methods.333

Treatment outcomes simulation

3D digital models enable patients to visualize predicted outcomes, helping set realistic expectations and improving treatment understanding and satisfaction.337, 338, 339 SmileView allows users to upload a selfie and receive an instant, AI-powered simulation of their potential smile transformation.340

Appliances fabrication

CAD-CAM and 3D printing enable precise, patient-specific appliances – including space maintainers, bracket system, removable aligners, and guided bonding devices – improving fit, efficiency, and clinical outcomes.341, 342, 343, 344,346 However, CAD-CAM retainers experienced a 50% failure rate within 6 months, possibly due to manufacturing delays leading to complications and suboptimal outcomes.345

Patient management

Teledentistry streamlines referrals by enabling clinicians to forward radiographs and clinical data to specialists, reducing unnecessary visits.331,332 It also supports patient education and engagement through reminders and educational clips, while applications like Dental Monitoring allow patients to submit photos for AI-assisted assessment of tooth movement and hygiene, reducing in-person appointments.351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356 A Bluetooth-connected retainer can synchronize with smartphones to monitor patient compliance.350

Miscellaneous

Digital workflows also support surgical adjuncts, such as 3D-printed guides for piezoelectric corticotomies,347,348 and dynamic navigation for miniscrew insertion for palatal expansion.349

Overall, the integration of teledentistry, AI models, and CAD-CAM systems has advanced orthodontics by enabling more accurate diagnoses, better treatment planning, and improved patient communication.

Perioperative management

The section focuses on perioperative patient management in dental care – including preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative care – drawing on 61 articles (15%) summarized in Table 7.

Table 7.

Summary of digital applications in perioperative management (n = 61).

Indications Digital technologies Key applications in studies
Preoperative management AI (large language model)
  • Automatic consultation and education on dental conditions, eg, periodontology, dental implants, orthodontics, etc.361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366

Intraoperative management Computer-controlled delivery systems
Mobile games
VR and electronic devices
Postoperative management AI
  • Postoperation responses prediction based on demographic and medical metrics417

Teledentistry
  • Customized monitoring and guidance of pain and complications357, 358, 359, 360

AI, artificial intelligence; VR, virtual reality.

Preoperative management

Large language model-based chatbots can provide patient-centre support for preliminary consultation, screening, and education on issues related to periodontal care, dental implants, orthodontics, radiology, and more.361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366

Intraoperative management

During dental procedures, virtual reality (VR) immerses patients in simulated environments and has been shown to be an effective distraction technique that helps manage dental phobia and alleviate pain and distress.383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416 However, some individuals exhibited higher heart rates with VR than with cartoon videos, suggesting that VR may induce stress in certain contexts, particularly when patients feel isolated or lacks control.382 Other electronic devices have also been shown to reduce anxiety.379, 380, 381 During local anaesthesia, computer-controlled anaesthetic delivery systems regulate injection rate and pressure, resulting in less pain and anxiety than manual injections.367, 368, 369, 370, 371 In paediatric behaviour guidance, mobile dental games that simulate treatment in a playful manner are more effective than the traditional tell-show-do method in reducing anxiety and improving cooperation.372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378

Postoperative management

Teledentistry supports remote monitoring and management of postoperative dental pain and complications, enhancing communication and continuity of care.359,360 After periodontal treatment, mobile applications and intelligent power-driven toothbrushes can track periodontal parameters, deliver hygiene instructions, and improve plaque control.357,358 Machine learning has been used to predict post-treatment responses, enabling more personalized treatment plans.417

Overall, digital technologies are enhancing patient experience and satisfaction across all stages of care, from preoperative to postoperative.

This scoping review comprehensively synthesized the clinical applications of digital dentistry across multiple dental disciplines within the scope of the FDI Policy Statement. It shares the same goal of encouraging dental professionals, educators, researchers, and policymakers to embrace advancements while addressing the associated challenges. Moreover, it provides up-to-date and detailed insights to support readers in understanding and implementing the FDI Policy Statement in practice.

However, several limitations warrant considerations. First, restricting inclusion to English-language publications may have introduced selection bias. Second, to maintain a focused scope on clinical outcomes, we excluded educational and other nonclinical studies; consequently, some preclinical digital technologies with substantial promises were not examined. Third, the breadth of disciplines and technologies represented resulted in substantial heterogeneity in study designs, populations, methodologies, and study quality, which precluded direct comparisons and may have biased assessments of clinical effectiveness. These factors temper the generalizability of our findings.

Conclusion

This review shows that digital dentistry now spans a broad suite of technologies that improve efficiency, accuracy, and care quality across multiple dental disciplines. As novel tools and indications emerge, its scope will continue to grow, becoming more comprehensive and integral to routine practice. Realizing this potential will require addressing challenges in evidence generation and validation, workflow integration and interoperability, data security and ethics, training and change management, and cost and equitable access. In line with the FDI Policy Statement, the following recommendations are proposed for dental professionals, educators, and policymakers:

  • Align digital dentistry with primary healthcare and global oral health strategies.

  • Critically evaluate the evidence supporting digital dentistry applications.

  • Promote user-friendly technologies that are accessible to both providers and patients alike.

  • Enhance education and training to enable effective use of digital technologies while retaining professional judgement and responsible patient management.

  • Integrate comprehensive digital dentistry curricula across all levels of dental education.

  • Uphold legal and regulatory frameworks that protect privacy and ensure secure data collection, storage, and appropriate access.

  • Support the development and adoption of relevant standards to ensure the quality, effectiveness, safety, interoperability, and applicability of digital dentistry.

Author contributions

W.L. contributed to conception, design, and critically revised manuscript. Z.L. contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, interpretation, drafted and critically revised manuscript. K.M. contributed to data acquisition and interpretation. J.P., A.Z., A.C., F.M., J.P. and F.S. contributed to conception, and critically revised manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Acknowledgement

This review was developed to support and inform the development of an FDI World Dental Federation policy statement. The publication costs for this review were provided by a collaborative effort between the FDI and the International Dental Journal. There was no other funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Takeuchi Y., Koizumi H., Furuchi M., Sato Y., Ohkubo C., Matsumura H. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Sci. 2018;60(1):1–7. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.17-0444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Duret F., Preston J.D. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent. 1991;1(2):150–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization . 2nd ed. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2023. Classification of digital interventions, services and applications in health: a shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health.https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/373581/9789240081949-eng.pdf?sequence=1 Available from: [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization . 1st ed. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2021. Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schierz O., Hirsch C., Krey K.F., Ganss C., Kämmerer P.W., Schlenz M.A. Digital dentistry and its impact on oral health-related quality of life. J Evid-Based Dent Pract. 2024;24(1S) [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang J., Wang B., Liu Y.Y., et al. Recent advances in digital technology in implant dentistry. J Dent Res. 2024;103(8):787–799. doi: 10.1177/00220345241253794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Samaranayake L., Tuygunov N., Schwendicke F., et al. The transformative role of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a comprehensive overview. Part 1: fundamentals of AI, and its contemporary applications in dentistry. Int Dent J. 2025;75(2):383–396. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tuygunov N., Samaranayake L., Khurshid Z., et al. The transformative role of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a comprehensive overview part 2: the promise and perils, and the international dental federation communique. Int Dent J. 2025;75(2):397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; Available from: www.covidence.org
  • 11.Araújo M.R., Alvarez M.J., Godinho C.A. The effect of mobile text messages and a novel floss holder on gingival health: a randomized control trial. J Dent Hyg. 2020;94(4):29–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khademian F., Rezaee R., Pournik O. Randomized controlled trial: the effects of short message service on mothers’ oral health knowledge and practice. Community Dent Health. 2020;37(2):125–131. doi: 10.1922/CDH_4642Rezaee07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Makvandi Z., Karimi-Shahanjarini A., Faradmal J., Bashirian S. Evaluation of an oral health intervention among mothers of young children: a clustered randomized trial. J Res Health Sci. 2015;15(2):88–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Choonhawarakorn K., Kasemkhun P., Leelataweewud P. Effectiveness of a message service on child oral health practice via a social media application: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2025;35(2):446–455. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gurnani H., Naik S., Dsouza A., Thakur K. Using a mobile phone-based application as an adjunct to facilitate oral hygiene practices in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023;24(4):267–271. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2023.1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hurling R., Claessen J.P., Nicholson J., Schäfer F., Tomlin C.C., Lowe C.F. Automated coaching to help parents increase their children’s brushing frequency: an exploratory trial. Community Dent Health. 2013;30(2):88–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zolfaghari M., Shirmohammadi M., Shahhosseini H., Mokhtaran M., Mohebbi S.Z. Development and evaluation of a gamified smart phone mobile health application for oral health promotion in early childhood: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01374-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ki J.Y., Jo S.R., Cho K.S., Park J.E., Cho J.W., Jang J.H. Effect of oral health education using a mobile app (OHEMA) on the oral health and swallowing-related quality of life in community-based integrated care of the elderly: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21) [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marashi S.Z., Hidarnia A., Kazemi S.S., Shakerinejad G. The effect of educational intervention based on self-efficacy theory on promoting adolescent oral health behaviors through mobile application: a randomized controlled trial study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1283. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04970-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ng J.Y.M., Lim T.W., Tarib N., Ho T.K. Effect of educational progressive web application on patient’s oral and denture knowledge and hygiene: a randomised controlled trial. Health Informatics J. 2021;27(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scheerman J.F.M., van Meijel B., van Empelen P., et al. The effect of using a mobile application (‘WhiteTeeth’) on improving oral hygiene: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18(1):73–83. doi: 10.1111/idh.12415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.White J.S., Ramos-Gomez F., Liu J.X., et al. Monetary incentives for improving smartphone-measured oral hygiene behaviors in young children: a randomized pilot trial. PloS One. 2020;15(7) [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kundabala M., Shenoy R., Shetty N. Effectiveness of dental health education program using digital aids in dental clinics. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2018;9(5):132. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bansal K., Shamoo A., Purohit B., et al. Effectiveness of smartphone app on oral health knowledge, behavior, and practice in child-parent dyads: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent. 2023;45(6):469–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Calderon S.J., Comnick C.L., Villhauer A., et al. A social media intervention for promoting oral health behaviors in adolescents: a non-randomized pilot clinical trial. Oral Basel Switz. 2023;3(2):203–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Özvarış S.S., Çoğulu D., Özvarış S.S., Çoğulu D. Effects of a mobile application to improve oral hygiene in children. J Pediatr Res. 2024;11(1):11–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tobias G., Spanier A.B. Using an mHealth app (iGAM) to reduce gingivitis remotely (part 2): prospective observational study. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2021;9(9) [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kay E., Shou L. A randomised controlled trial of a smartphone application for improving oral hygiene. Br Dent J. 2019;226(7):508–511. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0202-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alkilzy M., Midani R., Höfer M., Splieth C. Improving toothbrushing with a smartphone app: results of a randomized controlled trial. Caries Res. 2019;53(6):628–635. doi: 10.1159/000499868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dey S., Deshmukh S., Umamaheshwari S., Dheeraj L., Sinchan H.G. Fluorescence-based evaluation of the efficacy of augmented reality-assisted toothbrush on oral hygiene practices among 6–8 years old children. J Adv Oral Res. 2023;14(2):183–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gomez J., Kilpatrick L., Ryan M., Gwaltney C. Impact of connected toothbrushes on patient perceptions of brushing skills and oral health: results from a randomized clinical trial and a single-arm intervention study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05907-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Holloway J.A., Seong J., Claydon N.C.A., et al. A pilot study to evaluate the impact of digital imaging on the delivery of oral hygiene instruction. J Dent. 2022;118 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vijyakumar M., Ashari A., Yazid F., Rani H., Kuppusamy E. Reliability of smartphone images to assess plaque score among preschool children: a pilot study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;48(2):143–148. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steinmeier S., Wiedemeier D., Hämmerle C.H.F., Mühlemann S. Accuracy of remote diagnoses using intraoral scans captured in approximate true color: a pilot and validation study in teledentistry. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01255-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kandala K., Archer H.R., Moss K.L., et al. Comparison of initial dental treatment decisions between in-person and asynchronous teledentistry examinations for people with special health care needs. J Am Dent Assoc 1939. 2024;155(8):687–698.e2. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Queyroux A., Saricassapian B., Herzog D., et al. Accuracy of teledentistry for diagnosing dental pathology using direct examination as a gold standard: results of the Tel-e-dent study of older adults living in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(6):528–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Giraudeau N., Camman P., Pourreyron L., Inquimbert C., Lefebvre P. The contribution of teledentistry in detecting tooth erosion in patients with eating disorders. Digit Health. 2021;7 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lim S.N., Woon X.R., Goh E.C., et al. Accuracy of dental symptom checker web application in the Singapore military population. Int Dent J. 2025;75(2):1148–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Omezli M.M., Torul D., Yilmaz E.B. Is teledentistry a feasible alternative for people who need special care? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022;17:e129. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mitbander R., Brenes D., Coole J.B., et al. Development and evaluation of an automated multimodal mobile detection of oral cancer imaging system to aid in risk-based management of oral mucosal lesions. Cancer Prev Res Phila Pa. 2025;18(4):197–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Birur N P, Song B., Sunny S.P., et al. Field validation of deep learning based point-of-care device for early detection of oral malignant and potentially malignant disorders. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ye Y.J., Han Y., Liu Y., Guo Z.L., Huang M.W. Utilizing deep learning for automated detection of oral lesions: a multicenter study. Oral Oncol. 2024;155 [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ali S.A., AlDehlawi H., Jazzar A., et al. The diagnostic performance of large language models and oral medicine consultants for identifying oral lesions in text-based clinical scenarios: prospective comparative study. JMIR AI. 2025;4(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grinberg N., Whitefield S., Kleinman S., Ianculovici C., Wasserman G., Peleg O. Assessing the performance of an artificial intelligence based chatbot in the differential diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions: clinical validation study. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29(4):188. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stillhart A., Häfliger R., Takeshita L., Stadlinger B., Leles C.R., Srinivasan M. Screening for dental pain using an automated face coding (AFC) software. J Dent. 2025;155 [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ahmed K., Whitters J., Ju X., Pierce S., MacLeod C., Murray C. A proposed methodology to assess the accuracy of 3D scanners and casts and monitor tooth wear progression in patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(5):514–521. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schlenz M.A., Schlenz M.B., Wöstmann B., Glatt A.S., Ganss C. Intraoral scanner-based monitoring of tooth wear in young adults: 24-month results. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(6):2775–2785. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Travassos da Rosa Moreira Bastos R., Teixeira da Silva P., Normando D. Reliability of qualitative occlusal tooth wear evaluation using an intraoral scanner: a pilot study. PloS One. 2021;16(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Díaz-Flores García V., Freire Y., David Fernández S., Gómez Sánchez M., Tomás Murillo B., Suárez A. Intraoral scanning for monitoring dental wear and its risk factors: a prospective study. Healthc Basel Switz. 2024;12(11):1069. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Innes N., Fairhurst C., Whiteside K., et al. Behaviour change intervention for toothbrushing (lesson and text messages) to prevent dental caries in secondary school pupils: the BRIGHT randomized control trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024;52(4):469–478. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Marshman Z., Ainsworth H., Fairhurst C., et al. Behaviour change intervention (education and text) to prevent dental caries in secondary school pupils: BRIGHT RCT, process and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2024;28(52):1–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nishi M., Kelleher V., Cronin M., Allen F. The effect of mobile personalised texting versus non-personalised texting on the caries risk of underprivileged adults: a randomised control trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:44. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0729-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Estai M., Kanagasingam Y., Huang B., et al. Comparison of a smartphone-based photographic method with face-to-face caries assessment: a mobile teledentistry model. Telemed E-Health. 2017;23(5):435–440. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Daniel S., Kumar S. Comparison of dental hygienists and dentists: clinical and teledentistry identification of dental caries in children. Int J Dent Hyg. 2017;15(4):e143–e148. doi: 10.1111/idh.12232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Golsanamloo O., Iranizadeh S., Jamei Khosroshahi A.R., et al. Accuracy of teledentistry for diagnosis and treatment planning of pediatric patients during COVID-19 pandemic. Albahri OS, editor. Int J Telemed Appl. 2022;2022:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.AlShaya M., Farsi D., Farsi N., Farsi N. The accuracy of teledentistry in caries detection in children – a diagnostic study. Digit Health. 2022;8 [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ciardo A., Sonnenschein S.K., Simon M.M., et al. Remote assessment of DMFT and number of implants with intraoral digital photography in an elderly patient population – a comparative study. PLoS One. 2022;17(5) [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lamas-Lara V.F., Mattos-Vela M.A., Evaristo-Chiyong T.A., Guerrero M.E., Jiménez-Yano J.F., Gómez-Meza D.N. Validity and reliability of a smartphone-based photographic method for detection of dental caries in adults for use in teledentistry. Front Oral Health. 2025;6 [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Morosini I de A.C., de Oliveira D.C., Ferreira F de M., Fraiz F.C., Torres-Pereira C.C. Performance of distant diagnosis of dental caries by teledentistry in juvenile offenders. Telemed J E-Health. 2014;20(6):584–589. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sharkawy M.N., Mohamed M., Abbas H.M. Accuracy of teledentistry versus clinical oral examination for aged-care home residents: a pilot study. J Frailty Aging. 2025;14(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Qari A.H., Hadi M., Alaidarous A., et al. The accuracy of asynchronous tele-screening for detecting dental caries in patient-captured mobile photos: a pilot study. Saudi Dent J. 2024;36(1):105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pandey P., Jasrasaria N., Bains R., Singh A., Manar M., Kumar A. The efficacy of dental caries telediagnosis using smartphone: a diagnostic study in geriatric patients. Cureus. 2023;15(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Das M., Shahnawaz K., Raghavendra K., Kavitha R., Nagareddy B., Murugesan S. Evaluating the accuracy of AI-based software vs human interpretation in the diagnosis of dental caries using intraoral radiographs: an RCT. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S812–S814. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1029_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Alam M.K., Alanazi N.H., Alazmi M.S., Nagarajappa A.K. Al-based detection of dental caries: comparative analysis with clinical examination. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S580–S582. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_872_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gakenheimer D.C. The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(7):883–890. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Al-Jallad N., Ly-Mapes O., Hao P., et al. Artificial intelligence-powered smartphone application, AICaries, improves at-home dental caries screening in children: moderated and unmoderated usability test. PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1(6) [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ayhan B., Ayan E., Karadağ G., Bayraktar Y. Evaluation of caries detection on bitewing radiographs: a comparative analysis of the improved deep learning model and dentist performance. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025;37(7):1949–1961. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bayati M., Alizadeh Savareh B., Ahmadinejad H., Mosavat F. Advanced AI-driven detection of interproximal caries in bitewing radiographs using YOLOv8. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):4641. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84737-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.ForouzeshFar P., Safaei A.A., Ghaderi F., Hashemikamangar S.S. Dental caries diagnosis from bitewing images using convolutional neural networks. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03973-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kwiatek J., Leśna M., Piskórz W., Kaczewiak J. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of an AI-based system for dental caries detection and clinical evaluation conducted by dentists. J Clin Med. 2025;14(5):1566. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Michou S., Tsakanikou A., Bakhshandeh A., Ekstrand K.R., Rahiotis C., Benetti A.R. Occlusal caries detection and monitoring using a 3D intraoral scanner system. An in vivo assessment. J Dent. 2024;143 [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mao Y.C., Lin Y.J., Hu J.P., et al. Automated caries detection under dental restorations and braces using deep learning. Bioengineering. 2025;12(5):533. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Qu X., Zhang C., Houser S.H., et al. Prediction model for early childhood caries risk based on behavioral determinants using a machine learning algorithm. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;227 [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hasan F., Tantawi M.E., Haque F., Foláyan M.O., Virtanen J.I. Early childhood caries risk prediction using machine learning approaches in Bangladesh. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05419-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Karhade D.S., Roach J., Shrestha P., et al. An automated machine learning classifier for early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent. 2021;43(3):191–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Daly S., Seong J., Parkinson C., Newcombe R., Claydon N., West N. A proof of concept study to confirm the suitability of an intra oral scanner to record oral images for the non-invasive assessment of gingival inflammation. J Dent. 2021;105 [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Daly S., Seong J., Parkinson C., Newcombe R., Claydon N., West N. A randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of oral health advice on gingival health using intra oral images combined with a gingivitis specific toothpaste. J Dent. 2023;131 [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chau R.C.W., Li G.H., Tew I.M., et al. Accuracy of artificial intelligence-based photographic detection of gingivitis. Int Dent J. 2023;73(5):724–730. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chau R.C.W., Cheng A.C.C., Mao K., et al. External validation of an AI mHealth tool for gingivitis detection among older adults at daycare centers: a pilot study. Int Dent J. 2025;75(3):1970–1978. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Muhammed Sunnetci K., Ulukaya S., Alkan A. Periodontal bone loss detection based on hybrid deep learning and machine learning models with a user-friendly application. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022;77 [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Jundaeng J., Chamchong R., Nithikathkul C. Artificial intelligence-powered innovations in periodontal diagnosis: a new era in dental healthcare. Front Med Technol. 2025;6 [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Butnaru O.M., Tatarciuc M., Luchian I., et al. AI efficiency in dentistry: comparing artificial intelligence systems with human practitioners in assessing several periodontal parameters. Medicina (Mex) 2025;61(4):572. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Abu P.A.R., Mao Y.C., Lin Y.J., et al. Precision medicine assessment of the radiographic defect angle of the intrabony defect in periodontal lesions by deep learning of bitewing radiographs. Bioengineering. 2025;12(1):43. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Laugisch O., Auschill T.M., Heumann C., Sculean A., Arweiler N.B. Clinical evaluation of a new electronic periodontal probe: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Diagn Basel Switz. 2021;12(1):42. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Renatus A., Trentzsch L., Schönfelder A., Schwarzenberger F., Jentsch H. Evaluation of an electronic periodontal probe versus a manual probe. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(11):ZH03–ZH07. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Tankova H., Lazarova Z., Rashkova M. Evaluation of an electronic periodontal probe versus a manual probe in the periodontal diagnosis of children aged 12-14 years. J IMAB—Annu Proceeding Sci Pap. 2021;27(4):4087–4091. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lai H., Su C.W., Yen A.M.F., et al. A prediction model for periodontal disease: modelling and validation from a national survey of 4061 Taiwanese adults. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(5):413–421. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lee C.T., Zhang K., Li W., et al. Identifying predictors of the tooth loss phenotype in a large periodontitis patient cohort using a machine learning approach. J Dent. 2024;144 [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Patel J.S., Su C., Tellez M., et al. Developing and testing a prediction model for periodontal disease using machine learning and big electronic dental record data. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5 [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Swinckels L., de Keijzer A., Loos B.G., et al. A personalized periodontitis risk based on nonimage electronic dental records by machine learning. J Dent. 2025;153 [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rebeiz T., Lawand G., Martin W., et al. Development of an artificial intelligence model for assisting periodontal therapy decision-making: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study. J Dent. 2025;159 [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Park S.Y., Byun S.H., Yang B.E., et al. Randomized controlled trial of digital therapeutics for temporomandibular disorder: a pilot study. J Dent. 2024;147 [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Qari A.H., Alharbi R.M., Alomiri S.S., Alandanusi B.N., Mirza L.A., Al-Harthy M.H. Patients’ experience with teledentistry compared to conventional follow-up visits in TMD clinic: a pilot study. J Dent. 2024;140 [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Luniyal C., Shukla A.K., Priyadarshi M., et al. Assessment of patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in digital smile design vs. conventional smile design: a randomized controlled trial. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S669–S671. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_928_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Cattoni F., Mastrangelo F., Gherlone E.F., Gastaldi G. A new total digital smile planning technique (3D-DSP) to fabricate CAD-CAM mockups for esthetic crowns and veneers. Int J Dent. 2016;2016 [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Chisnoiu A.M., Staicu A.C., Kui A., et al. Smile design and treatment planning – conventional versus digital – a pilot study. J Pers Med. 2023;13(7):1028. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Hristozova M., Dimitrova M., Zlatev S. Bilateral symmetry in the aesthetic area achieved by digital smile design on 3D virtual patient and conventional diagnostic wax-up – a comparative study. Dent J. 2024;12(12):373. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zhang R., Ding Q., Sun Y., Zhang L., Xie Q. Assessment of CAD-CAM zirconia crowns designed with 2 different methods: a self-controlled clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(5):686–692. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Di Fiore A., Monaco C., Brunello G., Granata S., Stellini E., Yilmaz B. Automatic digital design of the occlusal anatomy of monolithic zirconia crowns compared to dental technicians’ digital waxing: a controlled clinical trial. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(2):104–110. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Chau R.C.W., Hsung R.T.C., McGrath C., Pow E.H.N., Lam W.Y.H. Accuracy of artificial intelligence-designed single-molar dental prostheses: a feasibility study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(6):1111–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Almoro J.J.O., Caon F.D.P., Goldman B.H., Tan M.S.Q., Yap J.A.B., Magpantay A.T. Composite restoration using image recognition for teeth shade matching using deep learning. Proceeding of the 2024 5th Asia service sciences and software engineering conference; Tokyo Japan; ACM; 2024. pp. 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Chaware S.H., Borse S.V., Kakatkar V., Darekar A. Clinical performance of newly developed android mobile digital application on tooth shade reproduction: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. Contemp Clin Dent. 2023;14(1):3–10. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_522_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Brandt J., Nelson S., Lauer H.C., von Hehn U., Brandt S. In vivo study for tooth colour determination – visual versus digital. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(9):2863–2871. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mehl A., Bosch G., Fischer C., Ender A. In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods. Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(4):343–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Czigola A., Róth I., Vitai V., Fehér D., Hermann P., Borbély J. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(8):1166–1174. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bai H., Ye H., Ma K., et al. Template-aided and freehand guiding plane preparation for removable partial dentures: a randomized controlled trial. J Prosthodont. 2024;33(9):869–877. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Barwacz C., Shah K., Bittner N., et al. A retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional case series study evaluating outcomes of CAD/CAM abutments on implants from four manufacturers: 4-year mean follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(5):966–976. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Schepke U., Meijer H.J.A., Kerdijk W., Raghoebar G.M., Cune M. Stock versus CAD/CAM customized zirconia implant abutments – clinical and patient-based outcomes in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(1):74–84. doi: 10.1111/cid.12440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wittneben J.G., Abou-Ayash S., Gashi A., et al. Implant-supported single all-ceramic crowns made from prefabricated (stock) or individualized CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: a 5 year randomized clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(1):164–173. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wittneben J.G., Gavric J., Belser U.C., et al. Esthetic and clinical performance of implant-supported all-ceramic crowns made with prefabricated or CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: a randomized, multicenter clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2017;96(2):163–170. doi: 10.1177/0022034516681767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Donker V.J.J., Raghoebar G.M., Jensen-Louwerse C., Vissink A., Meijer H.J.A. Monolithic zirconia single tooth implant-supported restorations with CAD/CAM titanium abutments in the posterior region: a 1-year prospective case series study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(1):125–132. doi: 10.1111/cid.13069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hsu K.W., Shen Y.F., Wei P.C. Compatible CAD-CAM titanium abutments for posterior single-implant tooth replacement: a retrospective case series. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):363–366. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ahrberg D., Lauer H.C., Ahrberg M., Weigl P. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(2):291–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Boeddinghaus M., Breloer E.S., Rehmann P., Wöstmann B. Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(8):2027–2034. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Seth C., Bawa A., Gotfredsen K. Digital versus conventional prosthetic workflow for dental students providing implant-supported single crowns: a randomized crossover study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(3):450–456. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wismeijer D., Mans R., van Genuchten M., Reijers H.A. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (intraoral scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(10):1113–1118. doi: 10.1111/clr.12234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Gjelvold B., Chrcanovic B.R., Korduner E.K., Collin-Bagewitz I., Kisch J. Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique. A randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(4):282–287. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Joda T., Brägger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(12):e185–e189. doi: 10.1111/clr.12600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Elashry W.Y., Elsheikh M.M., Elsheikh A.M. Evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques in bilateral distal extension cases: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04495-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Harfagar G., Solis S., Hernandez M., Fehmer V., Sailer I., Azevedo L. Trueness and passivity of digital and conventional implant impressions in edentulous jaws: a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025;27(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Lee S.J., Jamjoom F.Z., Le T., Radics A., Gallucci G.O. A clinical study comparing digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: a crossover clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(1):42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yuzbasioglu E., Kurt H., Turunc R., Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hung Lam T., Minh Cuong P., Hoang Nam N., Huyen Bao Tran V., Viet H. Enhanced patient satisfaction with digital impressions using 3Shape TRIOS 3 move scanner for single-implant crowns. Appl Sci. 2025;15(6):2881. [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Serrano-Velasco D., Martín-Vacas A., Cintora-López P., Paz-Cortés M.M., Aragoneses J.M. Comparative analysis of the comfort of children and adolescents in digital and conventional full-arch impression methods: a crossover randomized trial. Child Basel Switz. 2024;11(2):190. [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Vavrickova L., Kapitan M., Schmidt J. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of digital and conventional impression methods for fixed dentures. Technol Health Care. 2024;32(2):885–896. doi: 10.3233/THC-230277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Yilmaz H., Konca F.A., Aydin M.N. An updated comparison of current impression techniques regarding time, comfort, anxiety, and preference: a randomized crossover trial. Turk J Orthod. 2021;34(4):227–233. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.21025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Benic G.I., Mühlemann S., Fehmer V., Hämmerle C.H.F., Sailer I. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(5):777–782. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sailer I., Mühlemann S., Fehmer V., Hämmerle C.H.F., Benic G.I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(1):69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Al-Kaff F.T., Al Hamad K.Q. Additively manufactured CAD-CAM complete dentures with intraoral scanning and cast digitization: a controlled clinical trial. J Prosthodont. 2024;33(1):27–33. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Peñarrocha-Diago M., Balaguer-Martí J.C., Peñarrocha-Oltra D., Balaguer-Martínez J.F., Peñarrocha-Diago M., Agustín-Panadero R. A combined digital and stereophotogrammetric technique for rehabilitation with immediate loading of complete-arch, implant-supported prostheses: a randomized controlled pilot clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(5) [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Fu X., Liu M., Liu B., Tonetti M.S., Shi J., Lai H. Accuracy of intraoral scan with prefabricated aids and stereophotogrammetry compared with open tray impressions for complete-arch implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024;35(8):830–840. doi: 10.1111/clr.14183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Pozzi A., Carosi P., Gallucci G.O., Nagy K., Nardi A., Arcuri L. Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with intraoral optical scanning and stereophotogrammetry: an in vivo prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(10):1106–1117. doi: 10.1111/clr.14141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Nagar P., Prasad D.A., Satapathy S.K., Vigneswaran T., Francis M., Vijaysingh Jadhav A. Comparative study of conventional impressions vs intraoral scanning for complete denture fabrication. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 4):S3746–S3748. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1213_24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Yang X., Liu Y., Li Y., Zhao Y., Di P. Accuracy and feasibility of 3D-printed custom open trays for impressions of multiple implants: a self-controlled clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(3):396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Pereira A.L.C., Campos M., de F.T.P., Torres ACSP, Carreiro A., da F.P. Conventional and digital maxillary occlusal record for the manufacture of complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(5):255. [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Park M.H., Son K., Jin M.U., Kim S.Y., Lee K.B. Comparison of interference from eccentric movements of dental crowns fabricated via dynamic jaw motion tracking and conventional methods: a double-blind clinical study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2025;17(1):36–46. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Risciotti E., Squadrito N., Montanari D., et al. Digital protocol to record occlusal analysis in prosthodontics: a pilot study. J Clin Med. 2024;13(5):1370. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Inoue N., Scialabba R., Lee J.D., Lee S.J. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(1):136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kunavisarut C., Jarangkul W., Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S., Joda T. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) comparing digital and conventional workflows for treatment with posterior single-unit implant restorations: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2022;117 [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Corsalini M., Barile G., Ranieri F., et al. Comparison between conventional and digital workflow in implant prosthetic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Funct Biomater. 2024;15(6):149. doi: 10.3390/jfb15060149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Gintaute A., Zitzmann N.U., Brägger U., Weber K., Joda T. Patient-reported outcome measures compared to professional dental assessments of monolithic ZrO2 implant fixed dental prostheses in complete digital workflows: a double-blind crossover randomized controlled trial. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(1):18–25. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Joda T., Ferrari M., Bragger U., Zitzmann N.U. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of posterior single-implant crowns using digital workflows: a randomized controlled trial with a three-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(9):954–961. doi: 10.1111/clr.13360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Rattanapanich P., Aunmeungtong W., Chaijareenont P., Khongkhunthian P. Comparative study between an immediate loading protocol using the digital workflow and a conventional protocol for dental implant treatment: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2019;8(5):622. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Van de Winkel T., Delfos F., van der Heijden O., Bronkhorst E., Verhamme L., Meijer G. Fully digital versus conventional workflow: are removable complete overdentures equally good? A randomized crossover trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025;27(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Mangano F., Veronesi G. Digital versus analog procedures for the prosthetic restoration of single implants: a randomized controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018 [Google Scholar]
  • 146.De Angelis N., Pesce P., De Lorenzi M., Menini M. Evaluation of prosthetic marginal fit and implant survival rates for conventional and digital workflows in full-arch immediate loading rehabilitations: a retrospective clinical study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(10):3452. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Gianfreda F., Pesce P., Marcano E., Pistilli V., Bollero P., Canullo L. Clinical outcome of fully digital workflow for single-implant-supported crowns: a retrospective clinical study. Dent J. 2022;10(8):139. [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Hassan B., Gimenez Gonzalez B., Tahmaseb A., Greven M., Wismeijer D. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: a pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(4):486–492. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Hashemi A.M., Hashemi H.M., Siadat H., Shamshiri A., Afrashtehfar K.I., Alikhasi M. Fully digital versus conventional workflows for fabricating posterior three-unit implant-supported reconstructions: a prospective crossover clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(18) [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Al Hamad K.Q., Al Rashdan B.A., Al Omari W.M., Baba N.Z. Comparison of the fit of lithium disilicate crowns made from conventional, digital, or conventional/digital techniques. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e580–e586. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Mühlemann S., Benic G.I., Fehmer V., Hämmerle C.H.F., Sailer I. Clinical quality and efficiency of monolithic glass ceramic crowns in the posterior area: digital compared with conventional workflows. Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(3):215–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Sanchez-Lara A., Hosney S., Lampraki E., et al. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: a prospective clinical study. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(8):689–696. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Pontevedra P., Lopez-Suarez C., Rodriguez V., Pelaez J., Suarez M.J. Randomized clinical trial comparing monolithic and veneered zirconia three-unit posterior fixed partial dentures in a complete digital flow: three-year follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(6):4327–4335. [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Karasan D., Sailer I., Lee H., Demir F., Zarauz C., Akca K. Occlusal adjustment of 3-unit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with complete-digital and -analog workflows: a crossover clinical trial. J Dent. 2023;128 [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Verniani G., Ferrari M., Manfredini D., Ferrari Cagidiaco E. A randomized controlled clinical trial on lithium disilicate veneers manufactured by the CAD–CAM method: digital versus hybrid workflow. Prosthesis. 2024;6(2):329–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Zupancic Cepic L., Gruber R., Eder J., Vaskovich T., Schmid-Schwap M., Kundi M. Digital versus conventional dentures: a prospective, randomized cross-over study on clinical efficiency and patient satisfaction. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):434. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Faur A.B., Rotar R.N., Jivănescu A. Intaglio surface trueness of dentures bases fabricated with 3D printing vs. conventional workflow: a clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04439-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Joda T., Brägger U. Time-efficiency analysis comparing digital and conventional workflows for implant crowns: a prospective clinical crossover trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(5):1047–1053. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Pan S., Guo D., Zhou Y., Jung R.E., Hämmerle C.H.F., Mühlemann S. Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: a double-blind self-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(7):617–626. doi: 10.1111/clr.13447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Gintaute A., Weber K., Zitzmann N.U., Brägger U., Ferrari M., Joda T. A double-blind crossover RCT analyzing technical and clinical performance of monolithic ZrO2 Implant Fixed Dental Prostheses (iFDP) in three different digital workflows. J Clin Med. 2021;10(12):2661. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Rauch A., Reich S., Dalchau L., Schierz O. Clinical survival of chair-side generated monolithic lithium disilicate crowns:10-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(4):1763–1769. [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Aziz A., El-Mowafy O., Tenenbaum H.C., Lawrence H.P., Shokati B. Clinical performance of chairside monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(6):613–619. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Fasbinder D.J., Neiva G., Heys D., Heys R.J. Clinical evaluation of lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM crown after 10-years. Int J Prosthodont. 2025;0(0):1–29. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Nejatidanesh F., Savabi G., Amjadi M., Abbasi M., Savabi O. Five year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD/CAM ceramic laminate veneers – a retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62(4):462–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Srinivasan M., Schimmel M., Buser R., Maniewicz S., Herrmann F.R., Müller F. Mandibular two-implant overdentures with CAD-CAM milled bars with distal extensions or retentive anchors: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(12):1207–1222. doi: 10.1111/clr.13668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Toia M., Wennerberg A., Torrisi P., Farina V., Corrà E., Cecchinato D. Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes in implant-supported overdentures retained by milled bars: two-year follow-up. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(7):624–633. doi: 10.1111/joor.12784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.He W., Sun Y., Tian K., Xie X., Wang X., Li Z. Novel arch bar fabricated with a computer-aided design and three-dimensional printing: a feasibility study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(11):2162–2168. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Iwaki M., Akiyama Y., Qi K., et al. Oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction using three-dimensional printed dentures: a crossover randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2024;150 [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Drago C., Borgert A.J. Comparison of nonscheduled, postinsertion adjustment visits for complete dentures fabricated with conventional and CAD-CAM protocols: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(5):459–466. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Seydler B., Schmitter M. Clinical performance of two different CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic crowns: 2-year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(2):212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Otto T., De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(2):122–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Batson E.R., Cooper L.F., Duqum I., Mendonça G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):770–777. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Zeltner M., Sailer I., Mühlemann S., Özcan M., Hämmerle C.H.F., Benic G.I. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):354–362. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Sailer I., Benic G.I., Fehmer V., Hämmerle C.H.F., Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(1):43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Vanoorbeek S., Vandamme K., Lijnen I., Naert I. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(3):223–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Hobbi P., Ordueri T.M., Öztürk-Bozkurt F., Toz-Akalın T., Ateş M., Özcan M. 3D-printed resin composite posterior fixed dental prosthesis: a prospective clinical trial up to 1 year. Front Dent Med. 2024;5 [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Aziz A., El-Mowafy O. Six-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic CAD-CAM versus metal-ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont. 2023;15(1):44–54. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Boeckler A.F., Lee H., Psoch A., Setz J.M. Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium-ceramic-fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(8):592–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.del Hougne M., Di Lorenzo I., Höhne C., Schmitter M. A retrospective cohort study on 3D printed temporary crowns. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Hobbi P., Ordueri T.M., Öztürk-Bozkurt F., Toz-Akalιn T., Ateş M.M., Özcan M. Clinical performance of 3D printed resin composite posterior fixed dental prosthesis: a permanent solution? Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2025;33(1):1–10. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2796Hobbi10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Higashi C., Camargo R.C., Alves S.G.A., de Oliveira Viana Correia C., Hiromoto P.H. Enhancing esthetics with digital dentistry: a 2-year follow-up of 3D-printed restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025;37(9):2050–2059. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Tordiglione L., De Franco M., Bosetti G. The prosthetic workflow in the digital era. Int J Dent. 2016;2016 [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Tsanova M., Manchorova-Veleva N., Tsanova S. Application of 3D digital scanning and cad/cam systems for zirconia indirect restorations. J IMAB—Annu Proc Sci Pap. 2016;22(3):1320–1323. [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Zimmermann M., Koller C., Reymus M., Mehl A., Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of indirect particle-filled composite resin CAD/CAM partial crowns after 24 months. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(8):694–699. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Oudkerk J., Herman R., Eldafrawy M., et al. Intraoral wear of PICN CAD-CAM composite restorations used in severe tooth wear treatment: 5-year results of a prospective clinical study using 3D profilometry. Dent Mater. 2024;40(7):1056–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Oudkerk J., Eldafrawy M., Bekaert S., Grenade C., Vanheusden A., Mainjot A. The one-step no-prep approach for full-mouth rehabilitation of worn dentition using PICN CAD-CAM restorations: 2-yr results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent. 2020;92 [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Oudkerk J., Sanchez C., Grenade C., Vanheusden A., Mainjot A. The one-step no-prep technique for non-invasive full-mouth rehabilitation of worn dentition using PICN CAD-CAM restorations: up to 9-year results from a prospective and retrospective clinical study. Dent Mater. 2025;41(4):414–424. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Herpel C., Springer A., Puschkin G., et al. Removable partial dentures retained by hybrid CAD/CAM cobalt–chrome double crowns: 1-year results from a prospective clinical study: CAD/CAM cobalt–chrome double crowns: 1-year results. J Dent. 2021;115 [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Srinivasan M., Kalberer N., Fankhauser N., Naharro M., Maniewicz S., Müller F. CAD-CAM complete removable dental prostheses: a double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial evaluating milled and 3D-printed dentures. J Dent. 2021;115 [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Di Giacomo GDAP, Cury P.R., Da Silva A.M., Da Silva J.V.L., Ajzen S.A. A selective laser sintering prototype guide used to fabricate immediate interim fixed complete arch prostheses in flapless dental implant surgery: technique description and clinical results. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(6):874–879. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Kaushik S., Rathee M., Jain P., Malik S., Agarkar V., Alam M. Effect of conventionally fabricated and three-dimensional printed provisional restorations on hard and soft peri-implant tissues in the mandibular posterior region: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Dent Res J. 2023;20:109. [Google Scholar]
  • 192.De Souza F.A., Blois M.C., Collares K., Dos Santos M.B.F. 3D-printed and conventional provisional single crown fabrication on anterior implants: a randomized clinical trial. Dent Mater. 2024;40(2):340–347. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Beck F., Zupancic Cepic L., Lettner S., et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of single implant-supported zirconia crowns following a digital and conventional workflow: four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2):432. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Brenes C., Bencharit S., Fox T. Evaluation of prosthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction with 3D-printed implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Cureus. 2023;15(7) [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Cao Y., Hu M., Zhang J., et al. Analysis of the efficacy of two kinds of loss restoration of posterior teeth using 3D printing temporary crown during the second phase of implant surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103(48) [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Capparé P., Ferrini F., Ruscica C., Pantaleo G., Tetè G., Gherlone E.F. Digital versus traditional workflow for immediate loading in single-implant restoration: a randomized clinical trial. Biology. 2021;10(12):1281. doi: 10.3390/biology10121281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.De Angelis P., Passarelli P.C., Gasparini G., Boniello R., D’Amato G., De Angelis S. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: a 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):252–256. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Mendonça C., de Macedo D., Nicolai C., et al. Digital full-arch implant-supported polymethyl methacrylate interim prosthesis: a practice-based cohort study on survival and quality of life. Int J Prosthodont. 2024;37(4):394–403. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Papaspyridakos P., Lal K. Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(6):659–665. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Parpaiola A., Toia M., Norton M., et al. One-piece CAD/CAM abutment for screw-retained single- tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024;39(6):911–921. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Sobczak B., Majewski P., Egorenkov E. Survival and success of 3D-printed versus milled immediate provisional full-arch restorations: a retrospective analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025;27(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Sorrentino R., Ruggiero G., Toska E., Leone R., Zarone F. Clinical evaluation of cement-retained implant-supported CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia single crowns in posterior areas: results of a 6-year prospective clinical study. Prosthesis. 2022;4(3):383–393. [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Spies B.C., Pieralli S., Vach K., Kohal R.J. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic implant-supported single crowns made from lithium disilicate: final results of a 5-year prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(5):876–883. doi: 10.1111/cid.12508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Wierichs R.J., Kramer E.J., Reiss B., et al. Longevity and risk factors of CAD-CAM manufactured implant-supported all-ceramic crowns – a prospective, multi-center, practice-based cohort study. Dent Mater. 2024;40(11):1962–1969. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Gomaa A.M., Mostafa A.Z.H., El-Shaheed N.H. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life for four implant-assisted mandibular overdentures fabricated with CAD/CAM milled poly methyl methacrylate, CAD/CAM-milled poly ether ether ketone, or conventional poly methyl methacrylate: a crossover clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2023;50(7):566–579. doi: 10.1111/joor.13455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Ali A.E.A., Habib A., Shady M. Digital versus conventional techniques for construction of mandibular implant retained overdenture. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05918-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Bidra A.S., Farrell K., Burnham D., Dhingra A., Taylor T.D., Kuo C.L. Prospective cohort pilot study of 2-visit CAD/CAM monolithic complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: clinical and patient-centered outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(5):578–586.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Elawady D.M., Ibrahim W.I., Osman R.B. Clinical evaluation of implant overdentures fabricated using 3D-printing technology versus conventional fabrication techniques: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Comput Dent. 2021;24(4):375–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Scarano A., Stoppaccioli M., Casolino T. Zirconia crowns cemented on titanium bars using CAD/CAM: a five-year follow-up prospective clinical study of 9 patients. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0988-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Liu J., Maihemaiti M., Ren L., et al. A comparative study of the use of digital technology in the anterior smile experience. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04228-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Enfedaque-Prat M., González-Barnadas A., Jorba-García A., et al. Accuracy of guided dual technique in esthetic crown lengthening: a prospective case-series study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025;37(6):1284–1296. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Salmi M., Paloheimo K.S., Tuomi J., Ingman T., Mäkitie A. A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10(84) [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Pecenek D., Gokcen-Rohlig B., Ongul D., Ayvalioglu D.C. Evaluation of the clinical performance of different occlusal device materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(5):1806–1812. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Brandt S., Brandt J., Lauer H.C., Kunzmann A. Clinical evaluation of laboratory-made and CAD-CAM-fabricated occlusal devices to treat oral parafunction. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(2):123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Cui Y., Kang F., Li X., Shi X., Zhu X. A nomogram for predicting the risk of temporomandibular disorders in university students. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1047. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04832-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Zou W., Mao B., Fadlullah Z.M., Qi K. Assisting in diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders: a deep learning approach. IEEE Access. 2022;10:124076–124082. [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Benic G.I., Sailer I., Zeltner M., Gütermann J.N., Özcan M., Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(3):426–431. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Schnider N., Forrer F.A., Brägger U., Hicklin S.P. Clinical performance of one-piece, screw-retained implant crowns based on hand-veneered CAD/CAM zirconia abutments after a mean follow-up period of 2.3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):188–196. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Wei W.B., Wang Y.W., Han Z.X., Liu Z.Y., Liu Y.M., Chen M.J. Personalized tooth-supported digital guide plate used in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with balloon compression. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10(11):628. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-4827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.You S., Qin X., Zhao G., Feng Z. Personalized 3D printed tooth-supported template as a novel strategy for radiofrequency thermocoagulation for trigeminal neuralgia after the failure of CT-guided puncture. J Pain Res. 2024;17:2347–2356. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S449447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Picoli F.F., Fontenele R.C., Van der Cruyssen F., et al. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury after wisdom tooth removal using 3D AI-driven models: a within-patient study. J Dent. 2023;139 [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Yu D., Liu Z., Zhuang W., Li K., Lu Y. Development and validation of machine learning based prediction model for postoperative pain risk after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Heliyon. 2023;9(12) [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Bengtsson M., Wall G., Larsson P., Becktor J.P., Rasmusson L. Treatment outcomes and patient-reported quality of life after orthognathic surgery with computer-assisted 2- or 3-dimensional planning: a randomized double-blind active-controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(6):786–796. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Bengtsson M., Wall G., Greiff L., Rasmusson L. Treatment outcome in orthognathic surgery – a prospective randomized blinded case-controlled comparison of planning accuracy in computer-assisted two- and three-dimensional planning techniques (part II) J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2017;45(9):1419–1424. [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Liang Y., Qiu L., Lu T., et al. Proceedings of the 26th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery; New York, NY, USA: 2021. OralViewer: 3D demonstration of dental surgeries for patient education with oral cavity reconstruction from a 2D panoramic X-ray; pp. 553–563. [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Dalessandri D., Tonni I., Laffranchi L., et al. Evaluation of a digital protocol for pre-surgical orthopedic treatment of cleft lip and palate in newborn patients: a pilot study. Dent J. 2019;7(4):111. [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Xing Gao B., Iglesias-Velázquez O., G F Tresguerres F., et al. Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7:65. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00350-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Kivovics M., Szanyi S.M., Takács A., Répási M., Németh O., Mijiritsky E. Computer-assisted open exposure of palatally impacted canines for orthodontic eruption: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2024;147 [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Pillai A.R., Ibrahim M., Malhotra A., et al. Comparative analysis of surgical techniques for wisdom tooth extraction. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 3):S2576. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_260_24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Xu Q., Bai X., Zhou X., Chen M., Li Y., Zhang T. Feasibility study of a novel digital template-guided flapless extraction for maxillary palatal impacted teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(6):325. [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Singh S., Gupta E., Nalini Sailaja I., et al. Evaluation of the 3D technology in the auto-transplantation: an original research. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S143–S145. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_429_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Verweij J.P., Van Westerveld K.J.H., Anssari Moin D., Mensink G., Van Merkesteyn J.P.R. Autotransplantation with a 3-dimensionally printed replica of the donor tooth minimizes extra-alveolar time and intraoperative fitting attempts: a multicenter prospective study of 100 transplanted teeth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(1):35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.He W., Tian K., Xie X., Wang E., Cui N. Computer-aided autotransplantation of teeth with 3D printed surgical guides and arch bar: a preliminary experience. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5939. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Pedrinaci I., Calatrava J., Couso-Queiruga E., et al. Tooth autotransplantation with adjunctive application of enamel matrix derivatives using a digital workflow: a prospective case series. J Dent. 2024;148 [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Wu Y., Chen J., Xie F., Liu H., Niu G., Zhou L. Autotransplantation of mature impacted tooth to a fresh molar socket using a 3D replica and guided bone regeneration: two years retrospective case series. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0945-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Kim N.H., Yang B.E., On S.W., et al. Customized three-dimensional printed ceramic bone grafts for osseous defects: a prospective randomized study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):3397. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53686-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Cucchi A, Bettini S, Corinaldesi G. A novel technique for digitalisation and customisation of reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene meshes: preliminary results of a clinical trial. Int J Oral Implant. 2022;15(2):129–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Ghanaati S., Al-Maawi S., Conrad T., Lorenz J., Rössler R., Sader R. Biomaterial-based bone regeneration and soft tissue management of the individualized 3D-titanium mesh: an alternative concept to autologous transplantation and flap mobilization. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2019;47(10):1633–1644. [Google Scholar]
  • 239.El Chaar E., Urtula A.B., Georgantza A., et al. Treatment of atrophic ridges with titanium mesh: a retrospective study using 100% mineralized allograft and comparing dental stone versus 3D-printed models. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(4):491–500. doi: 10.11607/prd.3733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Aires I., Berger J. Planning implant placement on 3D stereolithographic models applied with immediate loading of implant-supported hybrid prostheses after multiple extractions: a case series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(1):172–178. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Manzano Romero P., Vellone V., Maffia F., Cicero G. Customized surgical protocols for guided bone regeneration using 3D printing technology: a retrospective clinical trial. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):e198–e202. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Jiang Y., Yang Y., Chen L., Zhou W., Man Y., Wang J. Digitally guided aspiration technique for maxillary sinus floor elevation in the presence of cysts: a case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025;27(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Narongchai N., Arunjaroensuk S., Subbalekha K., Kamolratanakul P., Pimkhaokham A., Mattheos N. Patient-reported healing of static computer-assisted sinus lateral window osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025;27(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Pozzi A., Moy P.K. Minimally invasive transcrestal guided sinus lift (TGSL): a clinical prospective proof-of-concept cohort study up to 52 months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(4):582–593. doi: 10.1111/cid.12034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Hamzah B., Mounir R., Ali S., Mounir M. Maxillary horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using computer guided ridge splitting with simultaneous implant placement versus conventional technique: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(4):555–561. doi: 10.1111/cid.13015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Zhu N., Liu J., Ma T., Zhang Y., Lin Y. Fully digital versus conventional workflow for horizontal ridge augmentation with intraoral block bone: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(6):809–820. doi: 10.1111/cid.13129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Chang Y.C., Zhu N., Liu J., Gao X., Chen G., Zhang Y. Evaluating the effects of dynamic navigation on the accuracy and outcomes of the autogenous bone ring technique for vertical ridge augmentation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025;36(5):650–661. doi: 10.1111/clr.14412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Tang Y., Zhai S., Yu H., Qiu L. Clinical feasibility evaluation of a digital workflow of prosthetically oriented onlay bone grafting for horizontal alveolar augmentation: a prospective pilot study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03556-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Satapathy S.K., Kunam A., Rashme R., Sudarsanam P.P., Gupta A., Kumar H.S.K. AI-assisted treatment planning for dental implant placement: clinical vs AI-generated plans. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S939–S941. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1121_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Lubbad M.A.H., Kurtulus I.L., Karaboga D., et al. A comparative analysis of deep learning-based approaches for classifying dental implants decision support system. J Imaging Inform Med. 2024;37(5):2559–2580. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01086-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Hassan N.A., Kamel A.E., Omran A.E., et al. Automated identification of dental implants: a new, fast and accurate artificial intelligence system. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2024;32(2):162–167. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2620Hassan06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Takahashi T., Nozaki K., Gonda T., Mameno T., Wada M., Ikebe K. Identification of dental implants using deep learning-pilot study. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00250-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Demirbaş A.E., Akkoyun E.F., Gümüş HÖ, Alkan B.A., Alkan A. Patient-specific root-analogue immediate titanium premolar dental implants: prospective evaluation of fifteen patients with one-year follow-up. Meandros Med Dent J. 2019;20(2):121–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Akkoyun E., Demirbaş A., Gümüş H., Alkan B., Alkan A. Custom-made root analog immediate dental implants: a prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022;37(6):1223–1231. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Chokaree P., Poovarodom P., Chaijareenont P., Rungsiyakull P. Effect of customized and prefabricated healing abutments on peri-implant soft tissue and bone in immediate implant sites: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2024;13(3):886. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Wang L., Wang T., Lu Y., Fan Z. Comparing the clinical outcome of peri-implant hard and soft tissue treated with immediate individualized CAD/CAM healing abutments and conventional healing abutments for single-tooth implants in esthetic areas over 12 months: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(5):977–984. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Elgendi M.M., Hamdy I.S.E., Sallam H.I. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning of immediate posterior implants by CAD-CAM socket sealing abutments: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05417-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Finelle G., Sanz-Martín I., Knafo B., Figué M., Popelut A. Digitalized CAD/CAM protocol for the fabrication of customized sealing socket healing abutments in immediate implants in molar sites. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(2):187–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Ayhan M., Ozturk Muhtar M., Kundakcioglu A., Kucukcakir O., Cansiz E. Evaluation of clinical success of the 3D-printed custom-made subperiosteal implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(4):1146. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Onică N., Budală D.G., Baciu E.R., et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of 3D-printed subperiosteal titanium implants: a 6-year follow-up. J Pers Med. 2024;14(5):541. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Jorba-García A., Bara-Casaus J.J., Camps-Font O., Sánchez-Garcés MÁ, Figueiredo R., Valmaseda-Castellón E. Accuracy of dental implant placement with or without the use of a dynamic navigation assisted system: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(5):438–449. doi: 10.1111/clr.14050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Arunjaroensuk S., Yotpibulwong T., Fu P.S., et al. Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Sci. 2024;19(Suppl 1):S44–S50. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Ewers R., Schicho K., Truppe M., et al. Computer-aided navigation in dental implantology: 7 years of clinical experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(3):329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Heng S., Arunjaroensuk S., Pozzi A., Damrongsirirat N., Pimkhaokham A., Mattheos N. Comparing medium to long-term esthetic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes between freehand and computer-assisted dental implant placement: a cross-sectional study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025;37(4):834–843. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Okubo M., Nagata K., Okuhama Y., et al. Clinical accuracy assessment of a dynamic navigation system and surgical guide using an oral appliance-secured patient tracker targeting anterior teeth. Int J Implant Dent. 2025;11(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00627-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Aydemir C.A., Arısan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(3):255–263. doi: 10.1111/clr.13563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Sießegger M., Schneider B.T., Mischkowski R.A., et al. Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2001;29(5):276–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Wittwer G., Adeyemo W.L., Wagner A., Enislidis G. Computer-guided flapless placement and immediate loading of four conical screw-type implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(4):534–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Engkawong S., Mattheos N., Pisarnturakit P.P., Pimkhaokham A., Subbalekha K. Comparing patient-reported outcomes and experiences among static, dynamic computer-aided, and conventional freehand dental implant placement: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(5):660–670. doi: 10.1111/cid.13030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Kunavisarut C., Santivitoonvong A., Chaikantha S., Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S., Joda T. Patient-reported outcome measures comparing static computer-aided implant surgery and conventional implant surgery for single-tooth replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(3):278–290. doi: 10.1111/clr.13886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Pozzi A., Holst S., Fabbri G., Tallarico M. Clinical reliability of CAD/CAM cross-arch zirconia bridges on immediately loaded implants placed with computer-assisted/template-guided surgery: a retrospective study with a follow-up between 3 and 5 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(Suppl 1):e86–e96. doi: 10.1111/cid.12132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Magrin G.L., Rafael S.N.F., Passoni B.B., et al. Clinical and tomographic comparison of dental implants placed by guided virtual surgery versus conventional technique: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(1):120–128. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Mahmoud N.R., Kamal Eldin M.H., Diab M.H., Mahmoud O.S., Fekry Y.E.S. Computer guided versus freehand dental implant surgery: randomized controlled clinical trial. Saudi Dent J. 2024;36(11):1472–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Nomiyama L.M., Matumoto E.K., Corrêa M.G., et al. Comparison between flapless-guided and conventional surgery for implant placement: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(4):1665–1679. [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Testori T., Robiony M., Parenti A., et al. Evaluation of accuracy and precision of a new guided surgery system: a multicenter clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34(Suppl 3):s59–s69. doi: 10.11607/prd.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Valente F., Schiroli G., Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(2):234–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Amorfini L., Pesce P., Migliorati M., et al. Implant rehabilitation of the esthetic area: a five-year retrospective study comparing conventional and fully guided surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023;25(3):438–446. doi: 10.1111/cid.13200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Berta G.M., Luigi C., Miguel P.D., Carlos B.M.J. Prospective clinical study on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in patients with distal free-end implants. Conventional versus CAD-CAM surgical guides. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025;36(3):314–324. doi: 10.1111/clr.14384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Chheda R.P., Chheda P.S., Shah R.M., Chandavarkar S. Determining accuracy of sleeveless tooth-supported surgical guide for guided implant surgery: a retrospective observational study. J Int Oral Health. 2021;13(5):478. [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Di Giacomo G.A.P., Cury P.R., de Araujo N.S., Sendyk W.R., Sendyk C.L. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol. 2005;76(4):503–507. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.di Torresanto V.M., Milinkovic I., Torsello F., Cordaro L. Computer-assisted flapless implant surgery in edentulous elderly patients: a 2-year follow up. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 1985. 2014;45(5):419–429. [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Fortin T., Bosson J.L., Coudert J.L., Isidori M. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(6):886–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Fotopoulos I., Lillis T., Panagiotidou E., Kapagiannidis I., Nazaroglou I., Dabarakis N. Accuracy of dental implant placement with 3D-printed surgical templates by using implant studio and MGUIDE. An observational study. Int J Comput Dent. 2022;25(3):249–256. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Frizzera F., Calazans N.N.N., Pascoal C.H., Martins M.E., Mendonça G. Flapless guided implant surgeries compared with conventional surgeries performed by nonexperienced individuals: randomized and controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(4):755–761. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Ozan O., Turkyilmaz I., Ersoy A.E., McGlumphy E.A., Rosenstiel S.F. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(2):394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Naziri E., Schramm A., Wilde F. Accuracy of computer-assisted implant placement with insertion templates. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016;5:Doc15. doi: 10.3205/iprs000094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Sarkar A., Hoda M.M., Malick R., Kumar A. Surgical stent guided versus conventional method of implant placement. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022;21(2):580–589. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01702-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Tia M., Guerriero A.T., Carnevale A., et al. Positional accuracy of dental implants placed by means of fully guided technique in partially edentulous patients: a retrospective study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025;11(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Vasak C., Watzak G., Gahleitner A., Strbac G., Schemper M., Zechner W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuideTM)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1157–1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Marra R., Acocella A., Rispoli A., Sacco R., Ganz S.D., Blasi A. Full-mouth rehabilitation with immediate loading of implants inserted with computer-guided flap-less surgery: a 3-year multicenter clinical evaluation with oral health impact profile. Implant Dent. 2013;22(5):444–452. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829f1f7f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Sancho-Puchades M., Alfaro F., Naenni N., Jung R., Hämmerle C., Schneider D. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted implant planning and placement in partially edentulous patients. Part 2: patient related outcome measures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(4):e99–110. doi: 10.11607/prd.4145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Tallarico M., Esposito M., Xhanari E., Caneva M., Meloni S.M. Computer-guided vs freehand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 5-year postloading results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):203–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Danza M, Carinci F. Flapless surgery and immediately loaded implants: a retrospective comparison between implantation with and without computer-assisted planned surgical stent. Stomatologija. 2010;12(2):35–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Baldi D., Colombo J., Motta F., Motta F.M., Zillio A., Scotti N. Digital vs. Freehand anterior single-tooth implant restoration. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020 [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Okay D.J., Buchbinder D., Urken M., Jacobson A., Lazarus C., Persky M. Computer-assisted implant rehabilitation of maxillomandibular defects reconstructed with vascularized bone free flaps. JAMA Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(4):371–381. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Pozzi A., Tallarico M., Marchetti M., Scarfò B., Esposito M. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(3):229–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Marra R., Acocella A., Alessandra R., Ganz S.D., Blasi A. Rehabilitation of full-mouth edentulism: immediate loading of implants inserted with computer-guided flapless surgery versus conventional dentures: a 5-year multicenter retrospective analysis and OHIP questionnaire. Implant Dent. 2017;26(1):54–58. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Meloni S.M., Tallarico M., Pisano M., Xhanari E., Canullo L. Immediate loading of fixed complete denture prosthesis supported by 4-8 implants placed using guided surgery: a 5-year prospective study on 66 patients with 356 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(1):195–206. doi: 10.1111/cid.12449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Meloni S.M., De Riu G., Pisano M., Massarelli O., Tullio A. Computer assisted dental rehabilitation in free flaps reconstructed jaws: one year follow-up of a prospective clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(8):726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Yamada J., Kori H., Tsukiyama Y., Matsushita Y., Kamo M., Koyano K. Immediate loading of complete-arch fixed prostheses for edentulous maxillae after flapless guided implant placement: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(1):184–193. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Almahrous G., David-Tchouda S., Sissoko A., Rancon N., Bosson J.L., Fortin T. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for two implant placement techniques in sinus region (bone graft versus computer-aided implant surgery): a randomized prospective trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):2990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17092990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Cristache C.M., Burlibasa M., Tudor I., Totu E.E., Di Francesco F., Moraru L. Accuracy, labor-time and patient-reported outcomes with partially versus fully digital workflow for flapless guided dental implants insertion – a randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5):1102. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Zhang S., Cai Q., Chen W., et al. Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024;35(2):220–229. doi: 10.1111/clr.14216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Yang F., Chen J., Cao R., et al. Comparative analysis of dental implant placement accuracy: semi-active robotic versus free-hand techniques: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024;26(6):1149–1161. doi: 10.1111/cid.13375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Shi J.Y., Liu B.L., Wu X.Y., et al. Improved positional accuracy of dental implant placement using a haptic and machine-vision-controlled collaborative surgery robot: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2024;51(1):24–32. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Shi J.Y., Wu X.Y., Lv X.L., et al. Comparison of implant precision with robots, navigation, or static guides. J Dent Res. 2025;104(1):37–44. doi: 10.1177/00220345241285566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Xie R., Liu Y., Wei H., Zhang T., Bai S., Zhao Y. Clinical evaluation of autonomous robotic-assisted full-arch implant surgery: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024;35(4):443–453. doi: 10.1111/clr.14243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Heimes D., Luhrenberg P., Langguth N., Kaya S., Obst C., Kämmerer P.W. Can teledentistry replace conventional clinical follow-up care for minor dental surgery? A prospective randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3444. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Patel P.K., Shukla A.K., Sachan V., et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of telemedicine in postoperative follow-up care after dental implant surgery. A pilot study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S463–S465. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_726_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Spoelstra S.L., Given C.W., Sikorskii A., et al. Proof of concept of a mobile health short message service text message intervention that promotes adherence to oral anticancer agent medications: a randomized controlled trial. Telemed J E-Health. 2016;22(6):497–506. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Karadaghy O.A., Shew M., New J., Bur A.M. Development and assessment of a machine learning model to help predict survival among patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(12):1115–1120. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Huang S.Y., Hsu R.J., Liu D.W., Hsu W.L. Using a machine learning algorithm and clinical data to predict the risk factors of disease recurrence after adjuvant treatment of advanced-stage oral cavity cancer. Tzu Chi Med J. 2025;37(1):91. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_56_24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Tino R., Roach M.A., Fuentes G.D., et al. Development and clinical implementation of a digital workflow utilizing 3D-printed oral stents for patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy. Oral Oncol. 2024;157 [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Rendenbach C., Steffen C., Hanken H., et al. Complication rates and clinical outcomes of osseous free flaps: a retrospective comparison of CAD/CAM versus conventional fixation in 128 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48(9):1156–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Saleh H.O., Moussa B.G., Salah Eddin K.A., Noman S.A., Salah A.M. Assessment of CAD/CAM customized V pattern plate versus standard miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture (randomized clinical trial) J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023;22(4):995–1005. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-02027-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Che S.A., Byun S.H., Cho S.W., et al. Digital technology revolutionizing mandibular fracture treatment: a comparative analysis of patient-specific plates and conventional titanium plates. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(8):417. [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Schepers R.H., Raghoebar G.M., Vissink A., et al. Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: a new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2015;43(5):649–657. [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Li S., Mi L., Bai L., et al. Application of 3D printed titanium mesh and digital guide plate in the repair of mandibular defects using double-layer folded fibula combined with simultaneous implantation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12 [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Kanno T., Karino M., Yoshino A., et al. Computer-assisted secondary reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects using non-vascularized iliac crest bone graft following oral cancer resection. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2017;26(4):386–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Lee Z.H., Avraham T., Monaco C., Patel A.A., Hirsch D.L., Levine J.P. Optimizing functional outcomes in mandibular condyle reconstruction with the free fibula flap using computer-aided design and manufacturing technology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(5):1098–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.El-Ashmawi N.A., Fayed M.M.S., El-Beialy A., Fares A.E., Attia K.H. Evaluation of facial esthetics following NAM versus CAD/NAM in infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate: a randomized clinical trial. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J. 2023;60(9):1078–1089. [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Chen H., Bi R., Hu Z., et al. Comparison of three different types of splints and templates for maxilla repositioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;50(5):635–642. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Hsu S.S.P., Gateno J., Bell R.B., et al. Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(1):128–142. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Adolphs N., Liu W., Keeve E., Hoffmeister B. RapidSplint: virtual splint generation for orthognathic surgery – results of a pilot series. Comput Aided Surg. 2014;19(1–3):20–28. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2014.887778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Chin S.J., Wilde F., Neuhaus M., Schramm A., Gellrich N.C., Rana M. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery with aid of CAD/CAM fabricated surgical splint-a novel 3D analyzing algorithm. J Cranio-Maxillo-fac Surg. 2017;45(12):1962–1970. [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Pietzka S., Fink J., Winter K., et al. Dental root injuries caused by osteosynthesis screws in orthognathic surgery-comparison of conventional osteosynthesis and osteosynthesis by CAD/CAM drill guides and patient-specific implants. J Pers Med. 2023;13(5):706. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Rodríguez-Arias J.P., Tapia B., Pampín M.M., et al. Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of fibula free flaps: a retrospective comparison of CAD/CAM versus conventional technique. J Pers Med. 2022;12(6):930. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Zotti R., Oliva G., Tian C., et al. Clinical accuracy of splintless maxillary positioning with aid of CAD/CAM fabricated surgical cutting guides and titanium plates. Coatings. 2022;12(10):1463. [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Casap N., Wexler A., Eliashar R. Computerized navigation for surgery of the lower jaw: comparison of 2 navigation systems. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(7):1467–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Eggers G., Mühling J., Hofele C. Clinical use of navigation based on cone-beam computer tomography in maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47(6):450–454. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Mandall N.A., O’Brien K.D., Brady J., Worthington H.V., Harvey L. Teledentistry for screening new patient orthodontic referrals. Part 1: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2005;199(10):659–662. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Cook J., Mullings C., Vowles R., Ireland R., Stephens C. Online orthodontic advice: a protocol for a pilot teledentistry system. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7(6):324–333. doi: 10.1258/1357633011936958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Gaonkar P., Mohammed I., Ribin M., Kumar D.C., Thomas P.A., Saini R. Assessing the impact of AI-enhanced diagnostic tools on the treatment planning of orthodontic cases: an RCT. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 2):S1798–S1800. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1147_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Mercier J.P., Rossi C., Sanchez I.N., Renovales I.D., Sahagún P.M.P., Templier L. Reliability and accuracy of artificial intelligence-based software for cephalometric diagnosis. A diagnostic study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1309. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05097-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Weingart J.V., Schlager S., Metzger M.C., et al. Automated detection of cephalometric landmarks using deep neural patchworks. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2023;52(6) [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Bardideh E., Lal Alizadeh F., Amiri M., Ghorbani M. Designing an artificial intelligence system for dental occlusion classification using intraoral photographs: a comparative analysis between artificial intelligence-based and clinical diagnoses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024;166(2):125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Lv L., He W., Ye H., et al. Interdisciplinary 3D digital treatment simulation before complex esthetic rehabilitation of orthodontic, orthognathic and prosthetic treatment: workflow establishment and primary evaluation. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:34. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02070-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Kusaibati A.M., Sultan K., Hajeer M.Y., Burhan A.S., Alam M.K. Adult patient expectations and satisfaction: can they be influenced by viewing the three-dimensional predicted outcome before fixed orthodontic treatment of dental crowding? J World Fed Orthod. 2023;12(6):269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Hadadpour S., Noruzian M., Abdi A.H., Baghban A.A., Nouri M. Can 3D imaging and digital software increase the ability to predict dental arch form after orthodontic treatment? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2019;156(6):870–877. [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Adel S.M., Bichu Y.M., Pandian S.M., Sabouni W., Shah C., Vaiid N. Clinical audit of an artificial intelligence (AI) empowered smile simulation system: a prospective clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2024;14 [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Jackers N., Maes N., Lambert F., Albert A., Charavet C. Standard vs computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing customized self-ligating systems using indirect bonding with both. Angle Orthod. 2021;91(1):74–80. doi: 10.2319/012920-59.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Xue C., Xu H., Guo Y., et al. Accurate bracket placement using a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing–guided bonding device: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(2):269–277. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Bachour P.C., Klabunde R., Grünheid T. Transfer accuracy of 3D-printed trays for indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2022;92(3):372–379. doi: 10.2319/073021-596.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Martorelli M., Gerbino S., Giudice M., Ausiello P. A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater. 2013;29(2):e1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Jowett A.C., Littlewood S.J., Hodge T.M., Dhaliwal H.K., Wu J. CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. J Orthod. 2023;50(1):55–68. doi: 10.1177/14653125221118935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Thakur B., Bhardwaj A., Luke A.M., Wahjuningrum D.A. Effectiveness of traditional band and loop space maintainer vs 3D-printed space maintainer following the loss of primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Gibreal O., Al-Modallal Y., Mahmoud G., Gibreal A. The efficacy and accuracy of 3D-guided orthodontic piezocision: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02902-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Cassetta M., Giansanti M., Di Mambro A., Calasso S., Barbato E. Minimally invasive corticotomy in orthodontics using a three-dimensional printed CAD/CAM surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(9):1059–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Brilli D., Giansanti M., Bertoldo S., Cauli I., Cassetta M. Dynamic navigation system accuracy in orthodontic miniscrew insertion in the palatine vault: a prospective single- arm clinical study. Int J Comput Dent. 2025 Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Castle E., Chung P., Behfar M.H., et al. Compliance monitoring via a Bluetooth-enabled retainer: a prospective clinical pilot study. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22(Suppl 1):149–153. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Impellizzeri A., Horodinsky M., Barbato E., Polimeni A., Salah P., Galluccio G. Dental monitoring application: it is a valid innovation in the orthodontics practice? Clin Ter. 2020;171(3):e260–e267. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Hansa I., Semaan S.J., Vaid N.R. Clinical outcomes and patient perspectives of dental monitoring® GoLive® with invisalign®-a retrospective cohort study. Prog Orthod. 2020;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00316-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Snider V., Homsi K., Kusnoto B., et al. Clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence driven remote monitoring technology for assessment of patient oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2024;165(5):586–592. [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Snider V., Homsi K., Kusnoto B., et al. Effectiveness of AI-driven remote monitoring technology in improving oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023;26(Suppl 1):102–110. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Mahmood H.T., Fatima F., Fida M., et al. Effectiveness of metronidazole gel and mobile telephone short-message service reminders on gingivitis in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2021;91(2):220–226. doi: 10.2319/052920-490.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Borujeni E.S., Sarshar F., Nasiri M., Sarshar S., Jazi L. Effect of teledentistry on the oral health status of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment at the first three follow-up visits. Dent Med Probl. 2021;58(3):299–304. doi: 10.17219/dmp/134750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Tonetti M.S., Deng K., Christiansen A., et al. Self-reported bleeding on brushing as a predictor of bleeding on probing: early observations from the deployment of an internet of things network of intelligent power-driven toothbrushes in a supportive periodontal care population. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(10):1219–1226. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Hartono V., Setiadharma Y., Rizany A.K., et al. Mobile application-based support for periodontal treatment improves clinical, cognitive, and psychomotor outcomes: a randomized controlled trial study. Dent J. 2024;12(3):63. [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Tokede B., Yansane A., Ibarra-Noriega A., et al. Evaluating the impact of an mHealth platform for managing acute postoperative dental pain: randomized controlled trial. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2023;11 [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Torul D., Kahveci K., Kahveci C. Is tele-dentistry an effective approach for patient follow-up in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;22(3):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Lv X., Zhang X., Li Y., Ding X., Lai H., Shi J. Leveraging large language models for improved patient access and self-management: assessor-blinded comparison between expert- and AI-generated content. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26 [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Akpınar H. Comparison of responses from different artificial intelligence-powered chatbots regarding the all-on-four dental implant concept. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:922. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06294-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Brozović J., Mikulić B., Tomas M., Juzbašić M., Blašković M. Assessing the performance of bing chat artificial intelligence: dental exams, clinical guidelines, and patients’ frequent questions. J Dent. 2024;144 [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Santonocito S., Cicciù M., Ronsivalle V. Evaluation of the impact of AI-based chatbot on orthodontic patient education: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29(5):278. [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Stephan D., Bertsch A.S., Schumacher S., et al. Improving patient communication by simplifying AI-generated dental radiology reports with ChatGPT: comparative study. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Suga T., Uehara O., Abiko Y., Toyofuku A. Evaluating large language models for burning mouth syndrome diagnosis. J Pain Res. 2025;18:1387–1405. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S509845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.El Hachem C., Kaloustian M.K., Cerutti F., Chedid N.R. Metallic syringe versus electronically assisted injection system: a comparative clinical study in children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(4):320–324. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.04.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Giannetti L., Forabosco E., Spinas E., Re D., Murri Dello Diago A. Single tooth anaesthesia: a new approach to the paediatric patient. A clinical experimental study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(1):40–43. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2018.19.01.07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Hao Y., Zhang Z., Meng Y. Application effect of computer-assisted local anesthesia in patient operation. Teekaraman Y, editor. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021;2021:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Ludovichetti F.S., Zuccon A., Zambon G., et al. Pain perception in paediatric patients: evaluation of computerised anaesthesia delivery system vs conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(2):153–156. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2022.23.02.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Flisfisch S., Woelber J.P., Walther W. Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Heliyon. 2021;7(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Karkoutly M., Al-Halabi M.N., Laflouf M., Bshara N. Effectiveness of a dental simulation game on reducing pain and anxiety during primary molars pulpotomy compared with tell-show-do technique in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04732-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Nair S.M., Nene K., Mathur A., et al. Evaluation of three different behaviour management strategies for dental management of highly anxious children: a randomised clinical study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2024;18(10):ZC12–ZC17. [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Goyel V., Mathur S., Dhingra N., Nair U., Singh S., Phukan A.H. Evaluation of different pre-treatment behaviour modification techniques in 4–7-year olds: a randomised controlled trial. Indian J Dent Res. 2022;33(1):58–62. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_373_21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Abbasi H., Saqib M., Jouhar R., et al. The efficacy of little lovely dentist, dental song, and tell-show-do techniques in alleviating dental anxiety in paediatric patients: a clinical trial. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021 [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Lekhwani P.S., Nigam A.G., Marwah N., Jain S. Comparative evaluation of tell-show-do technique and its modifications in managing anxious pediatric dental patients among 4-8 years of age. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2023;41(2):141–148. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_242_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Verma N., Gupta A., Garg S., Dogra S., Joshi S., Vaid P. Outcome of conventional versus digital mode of behaviour modification with or without maternal presence in paediatric dental patients – a pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(6):ZC66–ZC70. [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Yazar M., Aydınoğlu S., Günaçar D.N. Are technological contributions in behavior guidance techniques superior to conventional methods?: Effects on dental anxiety and pain perception. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06139-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Bali K., Ailawadi R., Karuna Y.M., et al. Assessment of smartphone-based active distraction in association with audioanalgesia for overcoming airotor-related anxiety in children: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Res Notes. 2025;18:46. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07119-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.CustÓdio N.B., Cademartori M.G., Azevedo M.S., et al. Efficacy of audiovisual distraction using eyeglasses during dental care: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2021;35:e26. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.Guinot F., Mercadé M., Oprysnyk L., Veloso A., Boj J.R. Comparison of active versus passive audiovisual distraction tools on children’s behaviour, anxiety and pain in paediatric dentistry: a randomised crossover clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(3):230–236. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2021.22.03.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382.Felemban O.M., Alshamrani R.M., Aljeddawi D.H., Bagher S.M. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during infiltration anesthesia in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01678-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Almugait M., AbuMostafa A. Comparison between the analgesic effectiveness and patients’ preference for virtual reality vs. topical anesthesia gel during the administration of local anesthesia in adult dental patients: a randomized clinical study. Sci Rep. 2021;11 [Google Scholar]
  • 384.Kasimoglu Y., Alpaycetin E., Ince G., Tuna Ince E.B. Reduction of dental anxiety in children using virtual reality: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2025;26(3):185–191. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2024.2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385.Alshatrat S.M., Sabarini J.M., Hammouri H.M., Al-Bakri I.A., Al-Omari W.M. Effect of immersive virtual reality on pain in different dental procedures in children: a pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022;32(2):264–272. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Bagher S.M., Felemban O.M., Alandijani A.A., Tashkandi M.M., Bhadila G.Y., Bagher A.M. The effect of virtual reality distraction on anxiety level during dental treatment among anxious pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;47(4):63–71. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Bahrololoomi Z., Zein Al-Din J., Maghsoudi N., Sajedi S. Efficacy of virtual reality distraction in reduction of pain and anxiety of pediatric dental patients in an Iranian population: a split-mouth randomized crossover clinical trial. Int J Dent. 2024;2024 [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Bentsen B., Svensson P., Wenzel A. Evaluation of effect of 3D video glasses on perceived pain and unpleasantness induced by restorative dental treatment. Eur J Pain Lond Engl. 2001;5(4):373–378. [Google Scholar]
  • 389.Ceylan E., Gurbuz E. The effect of virtual reality glasses on dental anxiety during scaling and root planing in patients with periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2024;22(3):749–757. doi: 10.1111/idh.12788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390.Du Q., Ma X., Wang S., et al. A digital intervention using virtual reality helmets to reduce dental anxiety of children under local anesthesia and primary teeth extraction: a randomized clinical trial. Brain Behav. 2022;12(6):e2600. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391.Ghobadi A., Moradpoor H., Sharini H., Khazaie H., Moradpoor P. The effect of virtual reality on reducing patients’ anxiety and pain during dental implant surgery. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03904-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Sorribes De Ramón L.A., Ferrández Martínez A.F., García Carricondo A.R., Espín Gálvez F., Alarcón Rodríguez R. Effect of virtual reality and music therapy on anxiety and perioperative pain in surgical extraction of impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1939. 2023;154(3):206–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Buldur B., Candan M. Does virtual reality affect children’s dental anxiety, pain, and behaviour? A randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Pesqui Bras Em Odontopediatria E Clínica Integrada. 2021;21:e0082. [Google Scholar]
  • 394.Demir Kösem D., Bektaş M., Bor N.A., Aşan H. The effect of virtual reality glasses used in dental treatment on anxiety and fear in children: a randomized controlled study. Pediatr Dent J. 2024;34(3):136–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 395.Gurbuz E., Gurbuz A.A. Investigation of the effect of virtual reality distraction in patients undergoing mandibular periodontal surgery: a randomized controlled study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(5):813–822. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Nuvvula S., Alahari S., Kamatham R., Challa R.R. Effect of audiovisual distraction with 3D video glasses on dental anxiety of children experiencing administration of local analgesia: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(1):43–50. doi: 10.1007/s40368-014-0145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 397.Padrino-Barrios C., McCombs G., Diawara N., De Leo G. The use of immersive visualization for the control of dental anxiety during oral debridement. J Dent Hyg JDH. 2015;89(6):372–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Pande P., Rana V., Srivastava N., Kaushik N. Effectiveness of different behavior guidance techniques in managing children with negative behavior in a dental setting: a randomized control study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020;38(3):259–265. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_342_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Pathak P.D., Lakade L.S., Patil K.V., Shah P.P., Patel A.R., Davalbhakta R.N. Clinical evaluation of feasibility and effectiveness using a virtual reality device during local anesthesia and extractions in pediatric patients. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023;24(3):379–386. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00801-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Shetty V., Suresh L.R., Hegde A.M. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety during dental treatment in 5 to 8 year old children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;43(2):97–102. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-43.2.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Valls-Ontañón A., Vandepputte S.S., de la Fuente C., et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality in relieving anxiety and controlling hemodynamics during oral surgery under local anesthesia: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2024;52(3):273–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Yamashita Y., Shimohira D., Aijima R., Mori K., Danjo A. Clinical effect of virtual reality to relieve anxiety during impacted mandibular third molar extraction under local anesthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(4):545.e1–545.e6. [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Aditya P.V.A., Prasad M.G., Nagaradhakrishna A., Raju N.S., Babu D.N. Comparison of effectiveness of three distraction techniques to allay dental anxiety during inferior alveolar nerve block in children: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Heliyon. 2021;7(9) [Google Scholar]
  • 404.Halabi M.N.A., Bshara N., AlNerabieah Z. Effectiveness of audio visual distraction using virtual reality eyeglasses versus tablet device in child behavioral management during inferior alveolar nerve block. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2018:55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Al-Khotani A., Bello L.A., Christidis N. Effects of audiovisual distraction on children’s behaviour during dental treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(6):494–501. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2016.1206211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.Anchala K., Tirumala V., Saikiran K.V., Elicherla N.R., Rahul S., Nuvvula S. Efficacy of kaleidoscope, virtual reality, and video games to alleviate dental anxiety during local anesthesia in children: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2024;24(3):195–204. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.3.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Balık E.A., Usluoğlu F. The effect of virtual reality glasses on dental anxiety in children who will receive dental treatment for the first time: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) Curr Psychol. 2024;43(41):31893–31905. [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Baniebrahimi G., Khosravinejad A., Paryab M., Kharrazi Fard M.J. Effects of virtual reality versus game applications on children’s dental fear: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr Perspect. 2022;10(12):17068–17076. [Google Scholar]
  • 409.Martínez-Martín V., Verdejo-Herrero J., Romero-Del Rey R., Garcia-Gonzalez J., Requena-Mullor M.D.M., Alarcon-Rodriguez R. The effect of immersive virtual reality on dental anxiety and intraoperative pain in adults undergoing local anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. Healthc Basel Switz. 2024;12(23):2424. [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Murali K., Shankar S., Fathima A., Karthick Impact of virtual reality distraction technique on dental anxiety during short dental procedure among 5-8 years children: a non-randomised clinical trial. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2021;11:56–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Kashyap K., Singh K., Malik M., Jhingan P., Anand P. Comparison of animal-assisted therapy, virtual reality, and conventional pretreatment behavior modification techniques: a randomized controlled trial study. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent. 2025;8(1):3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Jaiswal S., Neeli A., Chopra S. Effect of virtual reality in reducing anxiety during dental extractions: a clinical trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01795-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.Gómez-Polo C., Vilches A.A., Ribas D., Castaño-Séiquer A., Montero J. Behaviour and anxiety management of paediatric dental patients through virtual reality: a randomised clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2021;10(14):3019. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Salama R.M., El-Habashy L.M., Zeitoun S.I. Effectiveness of virtual reality glasses with integrated sign language in reducing dental anxiety during pulpotomy in children with hearing impairment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1388. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05129-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 415.Menon S.N., George B.B. Impact of virtual reality on perception of dental pain associated with dental scaling in healthy adults: a split mouth design randomised controlled study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2025;23(3):593–602. doi: 10.1111/idh.12894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Shafeeq S., Qureshi E.M., Hassan A.U., Haider S., Iqbal Z., Anwer W. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain and anxiety level among children aged 5-8 years during dental treatment. Ann Abbasi Shaheed Hosp Karachi Med Dent Coll. 2024;29(4) https://annals-ashkmdc.org/pre_install/1/index.php/ashkmdc/article/view/817 Available from. [Google Scholar]
  • 417.Feher B., de Souza Oliveira E.H., Mendes Duarte P., Werdich A.A., Giannobile W.V., Feres M. Machine learning-assisted prediction of clinical responses to periodontal treatment. J Periodontol. 2025:1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 418.Jekel J.F., Katz D.L., Elmore J.G., Wild D. Epidemiology, biostatistics and preventive medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences; Philadelphia: 2007. p. 436. [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Howell S.E.I., Kumar P., da Costa J., et al. Teledentistry adoption and applications: an American Dental Association Clinical Evaluators Panel survey. J Am Dent Assoc 1939. 2023;154(9):856–857.e2. [Google Scholar]
  • 420.El Tantawi M., Lam W.Y.H., Giraudeau N., et al. Teledentistry from research to practice: a tale of nineteen countries. Front Oral Health. 2023;4 [Google Scholar]
  • 421.World Health Organization. Mobile technologies for oral health: an implementation guide. 2021 Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240035225
  • 422.Fricton J., Chen H. Using teledentistry to improve access to dental care for the underserved. Dent Clin North Am. 2009;53(3):537–548. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 423.FDI World Dental Federation Artificial intelligence for dentistry. 2023. https://www.fdiworlddental.org/artificial-intelligence-dentistry-white-paper Available from.
  • 424.Duret F., Blouin J.L., Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;117(6):715–720. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Lepidi L., Galli M., Mastrangelo F., et al. Virtual articulators and virtual mounting procedures: where do we stand? J Prosthodont. 2021;30(1):24–35. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Li Q., Bi M., Yang K., Liu W. The creation of a virtual dental patient with dynamic occlusion and its application in esthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(1):14–18. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Kernen F., Kramer J., Wanner L., Wismeijer D., Nelson K., Flügge T. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery – data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:251. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01208-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 428.Carbajal Mejía J.B., Wakabayashi K., Nakamura T., Yatani H. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(3):392–399. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Nedelcu R.G., Persson A.S.K. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(6):1461–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Yang S., Wu L., Alabkaa B., Lepidi L., Yue L., Li J. Intraoral scanner-based virtual facebow transferring: a chairside dental technique. J Prosthodont. 2024 [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Salloum R. Revolutionizing dentistry: exploring the potential of facial scanners for precise treatment planning and enhanced patient outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Lin H., Pan Y., Wei X., Wang Y., Yu H., Cheng H. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(7):4017–4028. [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Liu H., He Z., Xie C., Rao S., Yu H. A digital workflow for full-mouth rehabilitation using CAD-CAM tooth reduction template. J Prosthodont. 2024;33(9):926–931. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Lam W.Y.H., Hsung R.T.C., Choi W.W.S., Luk H.W.K., Pow E.H.N. A 2-part facebow for CAD-CAM dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(6):843–847. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 435.Lam W.Y.H., Hsung R.T.C., Choi W.W.S., Luk H.W.K., Cheng L.Y.Y., Pow E.H.N. A clinical technique for virtual articulator mounting with natural head position by using calibrated stereophotogrammetry. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(6):902–908. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 436.Conejo J., Dayo A.F., Syed A.Z., Mupparapu M. The digital clone: intraoral scanning, face scans and cone beam computed tomography integration for diagnosis and treatment planning. Dent Clin North Am. 2021;65(3):529–553. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2021.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 437.Unsal G.S., Turkyilmaz I., Lakhia S. Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(4):e409–e417. doi: 10.4317/jced.55871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Panchal N., Mahmood L., Retana A., Emery R. Dynamic navigation for dental implant surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2019;31(4):539–547. [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Sukegawa S., Kanno T., Furuki Y. Application of computer-assisted navigation systems in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2018;54(3):139–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.D’haese J., Ackhurst J., Wismeijer D., De Bruyn H., Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):121–133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.Landaeta-Quinones C.G., Hernandez N., Zarroug N.K. Computer-assisted surgery: applications in dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 2018;62(3):403–420. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Dental Journal are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES