Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
. 2025 Nov 10;88(1):61–70. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001449

The Relationship Between Forms of Childhood Maltreatment and Vascular Function Indices in Black Men and Women

Telisa A Spikes 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,, Roland J Thorpe Jr 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Sandra B Dunbar 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Vasiliki Michopoulos 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Jordan Pelkmans 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Whitney Wharton 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Latesha K Harris 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Puja K Mehta 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Priscilla Pemu 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Herman Taylor 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Arshed Quyyumi 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
PMCID: PMC12721644  PMID: 41297048

Abstract

Objective:

Examine the association between types of childhood maltreatment and surrogate markers of vascular function, and to test whether sex modifies these relationships.

Methods:

Childhood maltreatment and indices of vascular function were assessed in a cohort of healthy Black adults without known CVD (n=404). Maltreatment (physical, sexual, emotional, and general trauma) domains were assessed using the Early Trauma Inventory Short Form. A trauma severity index score was calculated by summing the indexes for each domain. Outcomes of central augmentation index (cAIx) corrected for a heart rate of 75 bpm, and carotid femoral pulse wave velocity were measured as indices of wave reflections and arterial stiffness, respectively, and central pulse pressure (CPP). Associations between each domain and outcomes were assessed using multivariate-adjusted (demographics, clinical, health behaviors, and depressive symptoms) and sex-stratified linear regression models.

Results:

The cohort had a mean age of 53±10.3 years, and 61% were women. After adjustments, emotional abuse (2.68 [95% CI: −4.78, −0.58, P=.013]) and physical abuse (−2.38 [−4.26, −0.50, P=<.001]) were associated with cAIx in the overall cohort. Significant sex interactions were identified for emotional (P=.009) and physical abuse (P=.001) with cAIx and for emotional abuse with CPP (P=.021). Among women, physical abuse was associated with a higher cAIx (2.22 [95% CI: 0.70, 3.73, P=.004]), and among men, a lower cAIx (−2.59 [95% CI: −4.98, −0.19, P=.035]). Emotional abuse was also associated with higher CPP measures among women (1.31 [95% CI: 0.15, 2.46, P=.027]) with no associations identified in men.

Conclusions:

Physical and emotional abuse was associated with higher cAIx and CPP in women, but not men, suggesting sex-specific effects of early trauma on vascular function.

Key Words: vascular function, childhood trauma, Black adults, arterial compliance, hypertension, subclinical vascular disease

Abbreviations: cfPWV = carotid femoral pulse wave velocity, cAIx = central augmentation index, CPP = central pulse pressure

INTRODUCTION

Childhood traumatic events have garnered recognition as a significant risk factor for adverse mental and physical health outcomes including adult-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD).13 Childhood traumatic events broadly encompass a range of adverse experiences, including emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, as well as general trauma.3 These childhood experiences have also been shown to differ by sex, leading to variations in susceptibility to acute and chronic health effects.46 Existing studies examining the relationship between specific types of childhood maltreatment and subclinical markers of CVD, as well as, potential sex differences remain limited and have yielded mixed findings.7 A deeper understanding of which types of childhood adversity most impact cardiovascular health has important implications for developing tailored interventions and identifying key targets to mitigate the long-term cardiovascular consequences of early life exposures.

Similar to documented sex differences in CVD patterns, women are disproportionately more likely to experience childhood sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect, whereas the prevalence of physical abuse seems comparable between sexes.8,9 In women, all types of childhood maltreatment except emotional neglect have been associated with hypertensive heart disease and a greater risk of cerebrovascular disease.7 In men, all forms of childhood maltreatment, except sexual abuse, have been associated with hypertensive heart disease, whereas all except physical and sexual abuse have been linked to an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease.7 Furthermore, evidence indicates the impact of these events are stronger for women than men suggesting unequal susceptibility to future cardiovascular events.6,7

Forms of childhood traumatic events, including physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect, are linked to preclinical markers of vascular dysfunction, which underlie the pathophysiology of CVD, and are accompanied by adverse hemodynamic changes.6,1012 Vascular dysfunction involves impairment of the endothelium, the microvascular circulation and stiffening and thickening of the large arterial walls.13,14 In the large arteries, these vascular changes result from an imbalance between endogenous vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory factors, increased concentration of vascular reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory mediators, and loss of homeostatic function that ultimately reduces the distensibility and elasticity of both large and small vessels.13,14 Clinically relevant early markers of large arterial dysfunction include measures of arterial stiffness [carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV)], abnormal wave reflections (augmentation index cAIx) and abnormalities in central hemodynamic parameters [central pulse pressure (CPP)].13 These early markers of vascular dysfunction are associated with established CVD risk factors and adverse outcomes. Measures of arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and central hemodynamics have been linked to multi-organ damage, obesity, diabetes, stroke, and Alzheimer disease.1517

Similar to the sex-specific differences observed in cardiovascular outcomes, these vascular alterations are believed to have more severe health consequences in women than in men;6 however, empirical findings remain mixed. A previous study on sexual abuse found that childhood exposure among midlife women was associated with higher carotid intima-media thickness,18,19 but there was no sex-specific difference observed in another similar study from Germany.20 Prior exposure to adverse childhood events was also noted to be associated with impaired endothelial function among women with a history of childhood adversities.11 Conversely, childhood sexual abuse among men was linked to a 3-fold increased risk of myocardial infarction, whereas no such association was observed in women exposed to sexual abuse.21 Investigation into sex differences of these associations has offered valuable insights into the impact of certain exposures on upstream preclinical CVD risk; however, evidence regarding their relationship with additional preclinical markers of CVD risk remains limited. Understanding how different forms of childhood maltreatment relate to preclinical markers of CVD may clarify underlying mechanisms of risk and inform targeted interventions to reduce future CVD burden.

To better understand the relationships between forms of childhood traumatic events of general trauma, emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, we sought to extend upon our previous findings investigating the cumulative impact of childhood traumatic events on vascular dysfunction including arterial stiffness, and surrogate markers of arterial compliance.22 Given the disparate prevalence of childhood traumatic events that are experienced among Black children compared with White children, 21% versus 11%, these disparities may partially contribute to the disproportionate burden of early-onset hypertension and CVD that is observed among Black Americans.1,23 Furthermore, due to the scarcity of studies examining the relationship between childhood adversities and preclinical measures of CVD risk in Black populations, further research is needed to identify which specific exposures are most associated with heightened CVD risk. The aims of the current study were: (a) to investigate whether exposure to general trauma, and emotional, physical, and sexual abuse during childhood is associated with vascular function in a cohort of adult Black males and females with a low CVD risk burden; and (b) test if sex moderated these associations, as prior studies have found that men and women have differential exposures to childhood traumatic events,1 which may have important clinical implications for risk assessment, identification, and intervention targeting.

METHODS

Study Participants

The current study was a secondary data analysis of the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular Center for Health Equity (MECA) Study, a cross-sectional study designed to understand the intra-racial heterogeneity of environmental, individual, and biological factors that predispose Black Americans to increased risk or resilience from CVD.24 Adult participants (N=502) were recruited from 2016 to 2019, utilizing multiple sampling methods that included sampling across census tracts and convenience sampling across the greater Atlanta metropolitan area, between 30 to 70 years of age.25,26 Comprehensive details of the primary study methods are described elsewhere.24,26 Inclusion criteria included self-identification as African American or Black, 30 to 70 years old, and resided in their current neighborhood for at least 6 years.24 Exclusion criteria included individuals with a known history of CVD, such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accidents, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, atrial fibrillation, and cardiomyopathies. Additional exclusion criteria included concomitant chronic diseases (eg, cancer, human immunodeficiency virus, or lupus), self-reported substance abuse (alcohol or illicit drug), diagnosed psychiatric illness, pregnant or lactating women, and self-reported physical inability to participate in increased physical activity.24,26 Enrolled participants completed a physical exam, blood draw, and questionnaires by trained research personnel at either Morehouse School of Medicine or Emory University School of Medicine during the study visit. All aspects of the study were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of both institutions. The analytic sample for the current study was (n=404) participants due to the exclusion of participants with missing data on the following items: Early Trauma Inventory (n=43), central augmentation index (n=36), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (n=22).

Vascular Function Outcomes

Indices of arterial stiffness and pulse wave reflections were conducted noninvasively using applanation tonometry [SphygmoCor, Inc.]. Carotid-femoral artery pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), considered the gold standard method for the assessment of aortic stiffness,27 was assessed using transcutaneous Doppler flow velocity recordings simultaneously over the common carotid artery and the femoral artery.24 Peripheral pressure waveforms were recorded from the radial artery at the wrist with a high-fidelity micromanometer. After 20 sequential waveforms were acquired, a validated generalized transfer function was used to generate the corresponding central aortic pressure waveform.24 Central augmentation index (cAIx) is a measure of systemic arterial stiffness derived from the ascending aortic pressure waveform and represents the degree of pressure augmentation secondary to reflected waves from the periphery during systolic ejection.28,29 Augmentation index was normalized for a heart rate of 75 beats per minute.24 Reproducibility studies in our laboratory on consecutive days on 9 subjects demonstrated a coefficient of variation of 20.3% and 3.8% for augmentation index and PWV, respectively.24 Central pulse pressure (CPP), a surrogate marker of arterial compliance, was calculated as the difference between the aortic systolic and diastolic blood pressures.30 These measures are considered highly reproducible and are associated with CVD events.31,32

Childhood Traumatic Events

Childhood traumatic events were assessed using the validated 27-item Early Trauma Inventory Self-Report Short Form (ETISR-SF), which assesses exposure to traumatic life events before age 18.33 The subdomains consisted of general trauma, physical abuse, emotional abuse, and sexual abuse. Researchers may access a review copy of the scale at https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org/instruments/early-trauma-inventory-self-report-short-form. For the current study, we focused on the individual subdomains and not the cumulative score of the ETISR-SF. A trauma severity index score was calculated by summing the indexes for each of the 4 domains.33,34 Higher scores are indicative of greater trauma event exposure before the age of 18 years.33 The ETISR-SF has demonstrated high reliability with a Cronbach α ranging from 0.7 to 0.91 for the scales individual domains.33

Covariates

Covariate measures were chosen based on a priori knowledge of their association with vascular function.3537 Sociodemographic variables included age (years), education (≤high school, some college, or college and above), household income (<$25K, $25K to <$50K, $50K to <$75K, and ≥$75K), and marital status (married/ unmarried couple, divorce/separated/widowed, and never married). Clinical factors included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, and height in meters, fasting lipid panel [high-density cholesterol and low-density (HDL-c, LDL-c), triglyceride levels], and fasting blood glucose, mg/dL; medical history was self-reported and included medical history of diabetes or taking medication and hypertension or taking medication. Health behavior factors included alcohol use in the past 30 days (never; 1 to 2 times/week; 3 to 4 times/week; 5 to 6 times/week; daily; once/month; 2 to 3 times/month) and smoking status (current/quit ≤12 mo, never or quit>12 mo). Depressive symptoms were self-reported and assessed using the validated Beck Depression Inventory Index (BDI).38 In these analyses, depressive symptoms were analyzed as a continuous variable to preserve the full range of symptom variability. This approach is consistent with prior evidence that even subclinical levels of depressive symptoms may influence cardiovascular and health outcomes, making categorical cutoffs less informative.39

Statistical Analyses

All variables were examined for missing data, normality, and extreme values. Study variables are reported as mean (SD) for normally distributed continuous variables, median [IQR] for skewed continuous variables, and proportions for categorical variables. CAIx, CfPWV, and CPP were examined as continuous variables. Group differences between continuous variables were compared using t tests or χ2 analyses for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal distributed continuous variables.

Bivariate associations were conducted between each childhood traumatic event and vascular function outcomes of cAIx, CfPWV, and CPP. To facilitate interpretation and comparison across predictors, all continuous independent variables were standardized (mean=0, SD=1) before linear regression analysis. Standardized beta coefficients are reported to facilitate interpretation across predictors. Multivariate linear regression analyses were used to examine the independent relationship between each childhood traumatic event and vascular function outcomes (cAIx, CfPWV, and CPP) separately and after adjusting for potential confounding factors considered a priori for the overall cohort. Five models were specified and included, (model 1), sex; (model 2), demographic variables of age, education, household income, and marital status; (model 3), clinical factors of SBP, DBP, heart rate, height in inches, BMI, HDL-c, LDL-c, glucose, and triglycerides, medical history (diabetes, hypertension); (model 4), addition of health behaviors (smoking status and alcohol use), factors known to affect vascular function; and lastly, (model 5), the inclusion of depressive symptoms. We evaluated multicollinearity among predictors using the variance inflation factor (VIF), and all variables had VIF values below 5 indicating no evidence of multicollinearity.40 To determine whether forms of childhood traumatic events differed by sex, we included an interaction term for each childhood traumatic event (general trauma, emotional, physical, and sexual abuse) and sex in the fully adjusted regression model 5. Significant interaction models were then stratified by sex. The significance level for main effects and interaction effects was set at P<.05. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA, version SE 19.5 (StataCorp. 2025, LP: College Station, TX) software.

RESULTS

The distributions of participant characteristics for the overall sample and by sex are shown in Table 1. The distribution of the study population was 61% women and 39% men, mean age was 53±10.3 years old. The overall cohort held some form of college education; nearly half of the cohort reported earnings of less than $25,000 annually, and the majority were unmarried. Demographic factors by sex reveal that women were slightly older and more educated than men. There were significant sex differences between men and women for anthropometric, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors such that women had a higher BMI, shorter height (meters), higher LDL-c, and lower moderate/heavy alcohol consumption, lower mean depression scores, and lower rates of smoking.

TABLE 1.

Distribution of Select Characteristics for the Overall Cohort Stratified by Sex, the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular Center for Health Equity (MECA) Study, (n=404)

Overall (n=404) Males (n=159) Females (n=245) P a
Age, M (SD) 53 (10.3) 52 (10.3) 54 (10.2) .060
Education, n (%) <.001
 HS or less 123 (31) 66 (42) 57 (24)
 Some college 144 (36) 50 (31) 94 (39)
 College & above 136 (34) 43 (27) 93 (38)
Income, n (%) .515
 <$25K 187 (49) 75 (51) 112 (48)
 $25K-<$50K 111 (29) 46 (31) 65 (28)
 $50K-<$75K 52 (14) 16 (11) 36 (15)
 $≥75K 33 (9) 11 (7) 22 (9)
Marital status, n (%) .794
 Married 124 (31) 46 (29) 78 (32)
 Unmarried 278 (69) 112 (70) 166 (68)
Anthropometrics and CVD risk factors
 BMI, kg/m2, M (SD) 32.3 (7.5) 30.1 (6.6) 33.8 (7.8) <.001
 SBP, mmHg, M (SD) 131 (18.9) 132 (17.7) 130 (19.6) .332
 DBP, mmHg, M (SD) 80 (11.6) 80.1 (11.7) 80.1 (11.6) .976
 Heart rate, bpm, M (SD) 64 (11.1) 63 (11.2) 65 (11.0) .171
 Height, m, M (SD) 1.69 (0.09) 1.77 (0.07) 1.64 (0.07) <.001
 HDL-c, mg/dl, M (SD) 58 (17) 55 (18.1) 59 (16.0) .016
 LDL-c, mg/dl, M (SD) 116 (35.3) 109 (37) 120 (33.9) .004
 Triglycerides, MG/DL, M [IQR] 91 [65, 127] 90 [63, 126] 92 [68, 127] .364
 Glucose, mg/dl, M [IQR] 93 [86, 105] 94 [88, 106] 92 [85, 104] .559
 Diabetes, n (%) 97 (24) 36 (23) 61 (25) .597
 Hypertension, n (%) 213 (53) 80 (50) 133 (55) .385
 Beck Depression Index, M (SD) 7.5 (7.7) 8.6 (8.9) 6.7 (6.8) .022
Health behaviors, n (%)
 Alcohol use .001
  none 205 (51) 71 (45) 134 (55)
  low (1-2 drinks/day) 164 (41) 64 (40) 100 (41)
  moderate/heavy (≥3 drinks/day) 35 (9) 24 (15) 11 (4)
 Smoking status, n (%) <.001
  current 89 (22) 52 (33) 37 (15)
  quit ≤12 mo 17 (4) 10 (6) 7 (3)
  never/quit>12 mo 298 (74) 97 (61) 201 (82)
Childhood traumatic events, M (SD)
 emotional abuse 1.6 (1.9) 1.4 (1.8) 1.7 (1.9) .211
 general trauma 4.3 (2.4) 4.6 (2.5) 4.1 (2.3) .021
 physical abuse 2.0 (1.7) 2.4 (1.7) 1.7 (1.6) <.001
 sexual abuse 1.0 (1.6) 0.5 (1.2) 1.3 (1.7) <.001
Vascular stiffness markers
 CAIx%, M (SD) 25 (12.3) 23 (13.7) 27 (11.1) .001
 CfPWV,m/s, M (SD) 7.6 (2.1) 8.0 (2.4) 7.3 (1.8) .003
 CPP,mmHg, M (SD) 42.1 (11.1) 40.1 (10.0) 43.5 (11.6) .003

K=thousands of dollars; BMI=body mass index; SBP=systolic blood pressure; M [IQR]=median [interquartile range]; cAIx=central augmentation index; cfPWV=carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; CPP=central pulse pressure.

a

Mann-Whitney test P-value reported for non-normally distributed continuous variables, CAIx is %.

Sex differences existed for general trauma, physical, and sexual abuse. Compared with women, men reported higher exposure to general trauma and physical abuse, whereas women had more exposure to sexual abuse. As expected, females also had significantly higher mean cAIx and CPP measures compared with males who had significantly higher mean cfPWV.

Associations Between Childhood Traumatic Events and Vascular Function

The fully adjusted associations between each childhood traumatic event (general trauma, emotional, physical, and sexual abuse) and vascular function measures for the overall cohort are shown in Table 2. Detailed models for each traumatic event and vascular function measures are presented in Table S1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/PSYMED/B141, Table S2, SDC 2, http://links.lww.com/PSYMED/B142, Table S3, SDC 3, http://links.lww.com/PSYMED/B143, Table S4, SDC 4, http://links.lww.com/PSYMED/B144. Among the overall cohort, emotional abuse was associated with a −2.68% lower cAIx, (95% CI: −4.78, −0.58, P=.013) and physical abuse was associated with −2.38% lower cAIx (95% CI: −4.26, −0.50, P=.013) in the fully adjusted models that included the interaction terms. There were no significant associations between any of the additional childhood traumatic events and vascular function measures of cAIx, cfPWV, or CPP.

TABLE 2.

Standardized Beta Coefficients (β) and 95% CI for the Association Between Childhood Traumatic Events and Vascular Function Outcomes

CAIx β (95% CI) P CfPWV β (95% CI) P CPP β (95% CI) P
Emotional −2.68 (−4.78, −0.58) .013 0.23 (−0.09, 0.55) .156 −1.19 (−2.69, 0.30) .118
 Female vs. male −0.36 (−3.72, 3.00) .832 −0.31 (−0.82, 0.21) .243 0.76 (−1.63, 3.16) .531
 Emotionalasex −3.89 (1.43, 6.36) .002 −0.28 (−0.66, 0.10) .143 2.56 (0.81, 4.32) .004
General −6.74 (−28.34, 14.85) .539 −0.65 (−3.93, 2.63) .697 −5.66 (−20.96, 9.64) .467
 Female vs. male 29.33 (−14.73, 73.39) .191 −1.87 (−8.56, 4.82) .582 33.45 (2.23, 64.68) .036
 Generala​sex −18.57 (−8.77, 45.91) .183 −0.96 (−5.11, 3.19) .648 20.24 (0.87, 39.62) .041
Physical −2.38 (−4.26, −0.50) .013 0.03 (−0.26, 0.32) .853 −0.60 (−1.96, 0.77) .391
 Female vs. male −1.03 (−4.39, 2.32) .546 −0.28 (−0.80, 0.24) .289 0.58 (−1.85, 3.01) .640
 Physicalasex 4.57 (2.16, 6.98) <.001 −0.15 (−0.52, 0.22) .433 1.23 (−0.52, 2.98) .167
Sexual 0.90 (−15.22, 17.01) .913 −0.42 (−2.87, 2.02) .733 5.43 (−6.08, 16.94) .354
 Female vs. male 1.87 (−8.35, 12.09) .719 −0.38 (−1.93, 1.17) .632 −0.95 (−8.25, 6.34)a .797
 Sexualasex −5.52 (−12.62, 23.66) .550 −0.28 (−3.04, 2.47) .840 −2.56 (−15.51, 10.39) .698

All continuous independent variables were standardized before analysis. Values shown are standardized beta coefficients.

a

Fully adjusted models include: trauma domain, sex, age, education, income, marital status, SBP, DPB, heart rate, height (meters), HDL-c, LDL-c, glucose, triglycerides, history of DM, HTN, smoking status and alcohol use, depressive symptoms, trauma domain, and sex interaction term.

There were, however, significant trauma and sex interactions between emotional abuse and cAIx (P=.002), (Figure 1), physical abuse and cAIx (P=<.001), (Figure 2), and emotional abuse and CPP (P=.004), (Table 2, Figure 3). In sex-stratified analyses (Table 3), emotional abuse was associated with cAIx after full adjustment in men and not women. Physical abuse among men was associated with an adjusted −2.59% (95% CI: 4.98, 0.19) lower cAIx, whereas among women, it was associated with a 2.22% (95% CI: 0.70, 3.73) higher cAIx. Emotional abuse was no longer associated with CPP in models 3 to 5 after adjusting for clinical, health behaviors, and depressive symptoms for men. Among women, emotional abuse was associated with 1.31 mmHg (95% CI: 0.15, 2.46) higher CPP after full adjustment.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Predictive margins of sex and emotion abuse interaction on central augmentation index. Fully adjusted model including trauma domain, sex, age, education, income, marital status, SBP, DPB, heart rate, height (meters), HDL-c, LDL-c, glucose, triglycerides, history of DM, HTN, smoking status and alcohol use, depressive symptoms, trauma domain, and sex interaction term. Color image is available only in online version.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Predictive margins of sex and physical abuse interaction on central augmentation index. Fully adjusted model including trauma domain, sex, age, education, income, marital status, SBP, DPB, heart rate, height (meters), HDL-c, LDL-c, glucose, triglycerides, history of DM, HTN, smoking status and alcohol use, depressive symptoms, trauma domain, and sex interaction term. Color image is available only in online version.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Predictive margins of sex and emotional abuse interaction on central puluse pressure. Fully adjusted model including trauma domain, sex, age, education, income, marital status, SBP, DPB, heart rate, height (meters), HDL-c, LDL-c, glucose, triglycerides, history of DM, HTN, smoking status and alcohol use, depressive symptoms, trauma domain, and sex interaction term. Color image is available only in online version.

TABLE 3.

Sex Stratified Analyses of Unadjusted and Adjusted Association Between Emotional and Physical Abuse Childhood Trauma Domains and Central Augmentation Index and Central Pulse Pressure, in Men and Women

Outcome Childhood Maltreatment Model 1 P Model 2 P Model 3 P Model 4 P Model 5 P
β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95%CI)
CAIx @ 75bpm
 Males Emotional abuse −2.66 (−4.85, −0.48) .017 −1.74 (−4.10, 0.61) .146 −2.05 (−4.44, 0.35) .093 −2.40 (−4.83, 0.04) .053 −2.93 (−5.87, 0.01) .050
Physical abuse −2.82 (−4.84,−0.80) .007 −2.18 (−4.37, 0.02) .052 −2.19 (−4.44, 0.07) .058 −2.60 (−4.92, −0.27) .029 −2.59 (−4.98, −0.19) .035
 Females
Emotional abuse 0.77 (−0.60, 2.14) .268 1.05 (−0.36, 2.45) .143 1.09 (−0.33, 2.51) .133 0.91 (0.51,2.34) .208 0.92 (−0.53, 2.37) .211
Physical abuse 1.82 (0.34, 3.30) .016 2.66 (1.19, 4.12) <.001 2.57 (1.09, 4.04) .001 2.45 (0.95, 3.95) .002 2.22 (0.70, 3.73) .004
CPP
 Males Emotional abuse −2.41 (−4.00, −0.83) .003 −2.11 (−3.82, −0.41) .016 −1.02 (−2.43, 0.39) .155 −1.10 (−2.54, 0.35) .136 −1.17 (−2.88, 0.54) .178
 Females
Emotional abuse 0.12 (−1.32, 1.56) .866 0.90 (−0.42, 2.22) .178 1.56 (0.44, 2.69) .007 1.50 (0.37, 2.62) .009 1.31 (0.15, 2.46) .027

Values shown are standardized beta coefficients β.

Model 1: unadjusted.

Model 2: (model 1) + age, education, income, marital status.

Model 3: (model 2) + SBP, DPB, heart rate, height (meters), HDL-c, LDL-c, glucose, triglycerides, history of DM, HTN.

Model 4: (model 3) + smoking status and alcohol use.

Model 5: (model 4) + depressive symptoms.

DISCUSSION

In the current study, we sought to investigate the relationship between types of childhood maltreatment and markers of vascular function, and test whether sex modified these relationships in a cohort of Black adults. The main findings were that physical abuse was associated with lower cAIx in men, but higher cAIx in women. Emotional abuse was associated with higher central hemodynamics of CPP in women, with no relationship observed in men. A higher cAIx is indicative of increased pulse wave reflections or reduced arterial compliance, that in previous studies has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.41 To our knowledge, these findings are novel in Black adults, a group with elevated exposure to childhood trauma and limited research on its impact on subclinical CVD risk. Our findings build upon our previous observations that cumulative childhood trauma is associated with elevated cAIx and CPP, with sex significantly altering these relationships.22 We extend these prior findings by conducting an in-depth investigation of each type of childhood trauma on multiple indices of vascular function. Collectively, the current findings demonstrate that exposure to specific types of traumatic experiences during childhood may have important long-term clinical implications, especially for Black women.6

Emotional Abuse, Physical Abuse, and Central Augmentation Index

The emergence of an association between emotional abuse, physical abuse, and cAIx only after inclusion of the interaction term indicates emotional abuse and physical abuse do not independently predict cAIx. Moreover, our findings for the overall cohort contrast with prior investigations that have linked emotional abuse and physical abuse to an increased risk of subclinical and late-life CVD.18,42,43 Although sex differences were initially observed in the associations between emotional abuse, physical abuse, and cAIx, sex-stratified analyses revealed that emotional abuse was only associated with cAIx in men and not women. However, physical abuse was associated with cAIx in both males and females, with divergent patterns observed by sex. Females exposed to childhood physical abuse exhibited higher cAIx values, whereas males showed lower cAIx values. Our findings among females align in part with prior studies, which have reported that midlife women exposed to physical abuse had higher carotid intima-media thickness and increased carotid plaque.18 Similarly, in a population-based study of adults aged 30 to 64, women exposed to traumatic events demonstrated higher augmentation index values, an association not observed in men.44 Additional study is warranted to elucidate why physical abuse on cardiovascular health is stronger and more consequential in Black women compared with Black men, despite reporting higher exposure to physical abuse than women.

Emotional Abuse and Central Pulse Pressure

Sex differences were also observed between emotional abuse and CPP. Sex-stratified analyses revealed an association between emotional abuse and higher CPP among women that was absent in men. Our findings are in alignment with prior evidence suggesting the impact of certain forms of childhood adversity is larger for women than men.7 Factors that may contribute to these relationships in men require further investigation as our findings seem to be counterintuitive to current evidence.

SEX DIFFERENCES

The cause of these sex differences remains less clear. The cumulative stress model posits that distinct early adversities have additive effects on health, and the high burden of risk factors observed in women in this study may reflect stress-related mechanisms underlying behavioral, cognitive, affective, and biological sequalae.45,46 A notable paradox was that depressive symptoms were higher in males than females, even though depression is known to exert stronger cardiovascular effects in females.47,48 Although we did not observe adverse cardiovascular effects from abuse exposures among males, this should not be interpreted as absence of risk, as Black males often experience underdiagnosed chronic conditions and disproportionate CVD morbidity and mortality.49 These patterns may reflect distinct coping strategies used to navigate cumulative stressors and societal expectations.50 Nonetheless, additional study is warranted to better disentangle these relationships.

Childhood Maltreatment and Pulse Wave Velocity

There was no evidence of sex differences in the relationships between any of the childhood traumatic events and arterial stiffness, measured as cfPWV. These findings were unexpected, given the substantial body of evidence indicating that arterial stiffness precedes the development of hypertension.30,51 Augmentation index, a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness, is higher in females than males, largely but not entirely, due to shorter height in women. Other factors known to impact cAIx and CPP include heart rate, BP, smoking, and, LDL-c16,52 of which LDL-c was higher among females. Elevated LDL-c, a component of metabolic syndrome that is closely associated with obesity, is also considered a co-occurring comorbidity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).53 Beyond the scope of the current study, further research is needed to explore the presence of co-occurring PTSD symptoms and childhood trauma exposure, to understand their role in the subclinical CVD pathway, and how they may contribute to sex differences.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Our study had limitations that warrant comment. First, we assessed childhood traumatic events in a cohort of adults who self-identified as African American/Black and were from a southern geographic region. Thus, the results may not be generalizable to other racial/ethnic populations or different geographical regions of the United States. Second, our study was cross-sectional, limiting our ability to determine causal inferences. We acknowledge that multiple factors including age, genetics, lifestyle, and access to health care substantially influence both the risk and management of CVD.54 Accordingly, we used appropriate statistical methods to control for relevant covariates. Values for cAIx, cf-PWV, and CPP were analyzed as continuous variables and fell within the normal range based on established guidelines.30,55,56 However, we acknowledge that due to the single time point of data collection, we were unable to determine any temporal deviations or abnormalities in these measures. Nonetheless, further longitudinal research is warranted to explore these associations in greater depth, particularly earlier in the life course, to capture additional determinants that may affect vascular function. Third, we retrospectively assessed childhood traumatic events introducing the potential for recall bias and under-reporting of trauma as traumatic events rarely occur in isolation suggesting individuals are likely to experience multiple events simultaneously.57 In this regard, retrospective assessment of early life exposures through questionnaires is widely conducted and as such, individuals are likely to recall traumatic experiences that has occurred in their lifetime.58 Given the established connection between exposure to traumatic events and sex differences of PTSD,59 we were unable to investigate these relationships and their effect on vascular function. We acknowledge that our cohort included a wide age range; however, stratified analyses among participants under and over 50 years of age revealed that the associations remained relatively unchanged. In addition, we did neither control for menstrual sex hormones in relation to the menstrual cycle, nor occupational or physical activity on the day of vascular assessment, as these data were not collected as part of the parent study design. Lastly, we examined these associations using multiple surrogate markers of arterial stiffness, which may be less sensitive or informative than other indicators of subclinical disease for assessing the impact of childhood maltreatment on CVD risk.

Our study also had key strengths, including the assessment of traumatic-specific events utilizing a valid measure with clinically relevant, vascular function outcomes in a large cohort of Black adults, for which there is a paucity of evidence regarding these relationships, despite the unequal exposure to trauma and CVD burden in this population.60,61 After excluding individuals with CVD, substance use, and psychiatric illness, all of which have been linked to early life maltreatment,62 we still observed associations between specific types of childhood exposures and indices of vascular function. We also leverage the use of incorporating noninvasive yet highly reproducible measures of arterial stiffness and surrogate markers of vascular function. Lastly, we were able to investigate the relationship between childhood traumatic events and their link to adult-onset cardiovascular health in a cohort of Black adults with a low CVD risk burden.

In conclusion, emotional abuse and physical abuse among women were associated with worse vascular function, measured as CPP and cAIx, suggesting lower arterial compliance. Men had better vascular function despite exposure to emotional and physical abuse. These findings suggest that further study is needed to identify the underlying mechanisms that may explain these sex-based disparities and CVD risk in Black adults. The findings highlight domains associated with CVD risk, particularly in Black women, and may inform screening practices in ambulatory care as well as secondary prevention strategies targeting modifiable risk factors to reduce CVD events.

Supplementary Material

psy-88-61-s001.docx (60.7KB, docx)
psy-88-61-s002.docx (47.4KB, docx)
psy-88-61-s003.docx (44.9KB, docx)
psy-88-61-s004.docx (48.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

Source of Funding and Conflicts of Interest: This work was supported by funding in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), under Contract nos. (1 U01 HL079156-01 (Quyyumi) and 1 U01 HL79214-01 (Gibbons); NIH, National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Grant M01-RR00039 for the Emory Clinical Interaction Unit (ACTSI) and NIH/NCRR 5P20RR11104 for the Morehouse CRC. The American Heart Association 0000031288, Abraham J. & Phyllis Katz Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health T32 HL130025 & T32 HL007745–26A1 (MECA Study). Research reported in this publication was also supported by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute and National Institute of Nursing Research of the NIH under Award Numbers K24HL148521, T32HL130025, and K23NR020631. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Article Editor: Nina Kupper

Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's website, journals.lww.com/bsam.

Contributor Information

Telisa A. Spikes, Email: tspikes@emory.edu.

Roland J. Thorpe, Jr, Email: rthorpe@jhu.edu.

Sandra B. Dunbar, Email: sbdunba@emory.edu.

Vasiliki Michopoulos, Email: vmichop@emory.edu.

Jordan Pelkmans, Email: jordan.pelkmans@emory.edu.

Whitney Wharton, Email: w.wharton@emory.edu.

Latesha K. Harris, Email: lkharris@unc.edu.

Puja K. Mehta, Email: puja.kiran.mehta@emory.edu.

Priscilla Pemu, Email: pipemu@msm.edu.

Herman Taylor, Email: htaylor@msm.edu.

Arshed Quyyumi, Email: aquyyum@emory.edu.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Suglia SF, Koenen KC, Boynton-Jarrett R, Chan PS, Clark CJ, Danese A, et al. Childhood and adolescent adversity and cardiometabolic outcomes: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e15–e28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Salzmann S, Salzmann-Djufri M, Euteneuer F. Childhood emotional neglect and cardiovascular disease: a narrative review. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9815508:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.815508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gould F, Harvey PD, Hodgins G, Jones MT, Michopoulos V, Maples-Keller J, et al. Prior trauma-related experiences predict the development of posttraumatic stress disorder after a new traumatic event. Depress Anxiety. 2021;38:40–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kreatsoluas C, Fleegler EW, Kubzansky LD, McGorrian CM, Subramanian SV. Young adults and adverse childhood events: a potent measure of cardiovascular risk. Am J Med. 2019;132:605–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. World Health Organization. 2024. Accessed April 2025. https://apps.who.int/violence-info/child-maltreatment/ [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Godoy LC, Frankfurter C, Cooper M, Lay C, Maunder R, Farkouh ME. Association of adverse childhood experiences with cardiovascular disease later in life a review. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:228–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Soares ALG, Hammerton G, Howe LD, Rich-Edwards JW, Halligan S, Fraser A. Sex differences in the association between childhood maltreatment and cardiovascular disease in the UK biobank. Heart. 2020;106:1310–1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moody G, Cannings-John R, Hood K, Kemp A, Robling M. Establishing the international prevalence of self-reported child maltreatment: a systematic review by maltreatment type and gender. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stoltenborgh M. It should not hurt to be a child: prevalence of child maltreatment across the globe. 2012:26. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/19142 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gu H, Vallabh N, Motley WW. Adverse childhood experiences, race, and health outcomes: examining a synergistic relationship. Ohio J Public Health. 2022;5:48–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jenkins NDM, Rogers EM, Banks NF, Tomko PM, Sciarrillo CM, Emerson SR, et al. Childhood psychosocial stress is linked with impaired vascular endothelial function, lower SIRT1, and oxidative stress in young adulthood. Am J Physiol Heart Circulatory Physiol. 2021;321:H532–H541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Su S, Wang X, Kapuku GK, Treiber FA, Pollock DM, Harshfield GA, et al. Adverse childhood experiences are associated with detrimental hemodynamics and elevated circulating endothelin-1 in adolescents and young adults. Hypertension. 2014;64:201–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Matjuda EN, Engwa GA, Sewani-Rusike CR, Nkeh-Chungag BN. An overview of vascular dysfunction and determinants: the case of children of African Ancestry. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:769589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van Sloten TT. Vascular dysfunction: at the heart of cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms. Artery Res. 2017;19(C):18–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Humphrey JD, Mitchell GF. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk in hypertension. Circ Res. 2021;128:864–886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dart AM, Kingwell BA. Pulse pressure—a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:975–984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cooper LL, O’Donnell A, Beiser AS, Thibault EG, Sanchez JS, Benjamin EJ, et al. Association of aortic stiffness and pressure pulsatility with global amyloid-β and regional tau burden among framingham heart study participants without dementia. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:710–719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thurston RC, Chang Y, Barinas-Mitchell E, Känel Rv, Jennings JR, Santoro N, et al. Child abuse and neglect and subclinical cardiovascular disease among midlife women. Psychosom Med. 2017;79:441–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thurston RC, Chang Y, Derby CA, Bromberger JT, Harlow SD, Janssen I, et al. Abuse and subclinical cardiovascular disease among midlife women The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Stroke. 2014;45:2246–2251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Spitzer C, Lübke L, Klinger-König J, Frenzel S, Schminke U, Völzke H, et al. Childhood maltreatment and subclinical atherosclerosis: Findings From the General Population. Psychosom Med. 2021;83:463–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fuller-Thomson E, Bejan R, Hunter JT, Grundland T, Brennenstuhl S. The link between childhood sexual abuse and myocardial infarction in a population-based study. Child Abuse Neglect. 2012;36:656–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Spikes T, Thorpe RJ, Dunbar SB, Michopoulos V, Pelkmans J, Wharton W, et al. Effect of early life trauma exposure on vascular dysfunction in black men and women. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14:e036498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lanier P, Maguire-Jack K, Walsh T, Drake B, Hubel G. Race and ethnic differences in early childhood maltreatment in the United States. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014;35:419–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Islam SJ, Kim JH, Topel M, Liu C, Ko Y-A, Mujahid M, et al. Cardiovascular risk and resilience among black adults: rationale and design of the MECA study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Topel ML, Kim JH, Mujahid M, Ko Y-A, Vaccarino V, Mubasher M, et al. Individual characterisitics of resilience are associated with lower-than-expected neighborhood rates of cardiovascular disease in Blacks: results from the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular (MECA) Center for Health Equity Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:S1–S3; 1-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim JH, Lewis T, Topel M, Mubasher M, Li C, Vaccarino V, et al. Identification of resilient and at-risk neighborhoods for cardiovascular disease among Black residents: the Morehouse-Emory Cardiovascular (MECA) Center for Health Equity Study. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16(E57):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2007;25:1105–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Flint L, Cockcroft JR, Newby DE, Webb DJ. The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans. J Physiol. 2000;525 Pt 1(Pt 1):263–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Steppan J, Barodka V, Berkowitz DE, Nyhan D. Vascular stiffness and increased pulse pressure in the aging cardiovascular system. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:263585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Niiranen TJ, Kalesan B, Mitchell GF, Vasan RS. Relative contributions of pulse pressure and arterial stiffness to cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2019;73:712–717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim HL, Weber T. Pulsatile hemodynamics and coronary artery disease. Korean Circ J. 2021;51:881–898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bonarjee VVS. Arterial stiffness: a prognostic marker in coronary heart disease. available methods and clinical application. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:1–6; 64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bremner JD, Bolus R, Mayer EA. Psychometric properties of the Early Trauma Inventory-Self Report. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007;195:211–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bremner JD, Vermetten E, Mazure CM. Development and preliminary psychometric properties of an instrument for the measurement of childhood trauma: The Early Trauma Inventory. Depress Anxiety. 2000;12:1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morris AA, Patel RS, Binongo JNG, Poole J, Mheid IA, Ahmed Y, et al. Racial Differences in arterial stiffness and microcirculatory function between Black and White Americans. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Baldo MP, Cunha RS, Ribeiro ALP, Lotufo PA, Chor D, Barreto SM, et al. Racial differences in arterial stiffness are mainly determined by blood pressure levels: results from the ELSA-Brasil Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Birru MS, Matthews KA, Thurston RC, Brooks MM, Ibrahim S, Barinas-Mitchell E, et al. African-American ethnicity and cardiovascular risk factors are related to aortic pulse-wave velocity progression. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:809–815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dozois DJ, Dobson KS, Ahnberg JL. A psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychol Assess. 1998;10:83–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wellenius GA, Mukamal KJ, Kulshreshtha A, Asonganyi S, Mittleman MA. Depressive symptoms and the risk of atherosclerotic progression among patients with coronary artery bypass grafts. Circulation. 2008;117:2313–2319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim JH. Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72:558–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Janner JH, Godtfredsen NS, Ladelund S, Vestbo J, Prescott E. High aortic augmentation index predicts mortality and cardiovascular events in men from a general population, but not in women. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20:1005–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Galli F, Lai C, Gregorini T, Ciacchella C, Carugo S. Psychological traumas and cardiovascular disease: a case-control study. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9:847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen Y, Shan Y, Lin K, Wei Y, Kim H, Koenen KC, et al. Association between child abuse and risk of adult coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2023;65:143–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jung SJ, Jeon Y, Lee G, Shim J-S, Kim HC. Stressful life events and augmentation index: results from the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Etiology Research Center. Hypertens Res. 2020;43:45–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Evans GW, Li D, Whipple SS. Cumulative risk and child development. Psychol Bull. 2013;139:1342–1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ebong IA, Quesada O, Fonkoue IT, Mattina D, Sullivan S, Oliveira GMMd, et al. The role of psychosocial stress on cardiovascular disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84:298–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Meng L, Chen D, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Hui R. Depression increases the risk of hypertension incidence: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Hypertens. 2012;30:842–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kuehner C. Why is depression more common among women than among men? Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:146–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gilbert KL, Ray R, Siddiqi A, Shetty S, Baker EA, Elder K, et al. Visible and Invisible Trends in Black Men’s Health: Pitfalls and Promises for Addressing Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Inequities in Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:295–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Thorpe RJ, Jr, Cobb R, King K, Bruce MA, Archibald P, Jones HP, et al. The Association between depressive symptoms and accumulation of stress among Black men in the health and retirement study. Innov Aging. 2020;4:igaa047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Vita JA, et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women. Hypertension. 2004;43:1239–1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Janner JH, Godtfredsen NS, Ladelund S, Vestbo J, Prescott E. The association between aortic augmentation index and cardiovascular risk factors in a large unselected population. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26:476–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Michopoulos V, Vester A, Neigh G. Posttraumatic stress disorder: a metabolic disorder in disguise? Exp Neurol. 2016;284(Pt B):220–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cimmino G, Natale F, Alfieri R, Cante L, Covino S, Franzese R, et al. Non-Conventional risk factors: “Fact” or “Fake” in cardiovascular disease prevention? Biomedicines. 2023;11:2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2588–2605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Janner JH, Godtfredsen NS, Ladelund S, Vestbo J, Prescott E. Aortic Augmentation Index: Reference values in a large unselected population by means of the SphygmoCor device. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23:180–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dong M, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Dube SR, Williamson DF, Thompson TJ, et al. The interrelatedness of multiple forms of childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Child Abuse Negl. 2004;28:771–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Iffland B, Neuner F. Chapter 19 - Trauma and Memory Fink G. Stress: Concepts, Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior. Academic Press; 2016:161–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fonkoue IT, Michopoulos V, Park J. Sex differences in post-traumatic stress disorder risk: autonomic control and inflammation. Clin Auton Res. 2020;30:409–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Giano Z, Wheeler DL, Hubach RD. The frequencies and disparities of adverse childhood experiences in the U.S. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Carnethon M, Pu J, Howard G, Albert M, Anderson C, Bertoni A, et al. Cardiovascular Health in African Americans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136:e393–e423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Najman JM, Clavarino AM, McGee TR, Middeldorp CM, Williams GM, Scott JG. Do adversities experienced over the early life course predict mental illness and substance use behaviour in adulthood: a birth cohort study. J Psychiatr Res. 2022;155:542–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES