Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 22;16:283. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02158-4

Table 3.

Summary of heatmap similarity metrics for all configurations compared to the reference model (A2)

Input images Id Binarizer % RMSE Pearson correlation MSSIM EMD IoU Top 40% R IoU Top 10% R
Aligned T1w A1 None 10.78 ± 3.76 [5.98, 21.47] 0.13 ± 0.04 [0.06, 0.21] 0.25 ± 0.08 [0.12, 0.42] 8.44 ± 3.25 [3.99, 17.48] 0.06 ± 0.02 [0.02, 0.11] 0.01 ± 0.01 [0.00, 0.03]
B1 13.75 3.85 ± 0.87 [2.25, 5.48] 0.08 ± 0.03 [0.03, 0.15] 0.87 ± 0.04 [0.78, 0.94] 0.50 ± 0.29 [0.14, 1.29] 0.02 ± 0.01 [0.01, 0.04] 0.00 ± 0.00 [0.00, 0.01]
C1 27.50 4.77 ± 0.96 [3.07, 6.64] 0.18 ± 0.05 [0.08, 0.26] 0.83 ± 0.04 [0.74, 0.89] 0.71 ± 0.45 [0.11, 1.71] 0.07 ± 0.02 [0.03, 0.10] 0.01 ± 0.01 [0.00, 0.02]
D1 41.25 6.17 ± 1.15 [3.98, 8.34] 0.23 ± 0.05 [0.13, 0.30] 0.72 ± 0.06 [0.62, 0.83] 1.61 ± 0.62 [0.54, 2.75] 0.10 ± 0.02 [0.05, 0.14] 0.01 ± 0.01 [0.00, 0.03]
Skull-stripped T1w A2 None 0.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00
B2 13.75 2.79 ± 0.49 [1.97, 3.79] 0.58 ± 0.07 [0.44, 0.69] 0.91 ± 0.03 [0.82, 0.96] 0.39 ± 0.25 [0.12, 1.05] 0.24 ± 0.06 [0.13, 0.35] 0.15 ± 0.03 [0.08, 0.21]
C2 27.50 3.54 ± 0.61 [2.45, 4.85] 0.56 ± 0.07 [0.39, 0.67] 0.86 ± 0.04 [0.78, 0.92] 0.73 ± 0.44 [0.13, 1.67] 0.31 ± 0.05 [0.20, 0.37] 0.17 ± 0.03 [0.10, 0.24]
D2 41.25 3.72 ± 0.59 [2.69, 4.96] 0.51 ± 0.08 [0.33, 0.65] 0.80 ± 0.05 [0.68, 0.89] 1.01 ± 0.50 [0.23, 2.12] 0.26 ± 0.03 [0.18, 0.31] 0.16 ± 0.04 [0.09, 0.22]

Values between brackets show the 95% confidence interval

RMSE root mean square error, MSSIM mean structural similarity index measure, EMD Earth Mover’s distance, IoU intersection over union, R relevance

Values in bold highlight best result for metric