Skip to main content
Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health logoLink to Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health
. 2025 Dec 21;14:27536130251408821. doi: 10.1177/27536130251408821

From Dysregulation to Coherence: Exploring the HeartMath® Approach to Emotional and Physiological Regulation

Jorina Elbers 1,2,, Rollin McCraty 1
PMCID: PMC12722655  PMID: 41445965

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that the long-term effects of trauma and adversity are rooted not only in psychological distress, but in persistent dysregulation of the body’s stress response and its associated neuroendocrine systems. This physiological dysregulation has emerged as a critical contributor to health outcomes, yet remains under-addressed in conventional clinical care. Emotional states are integrated with core physiological functions through dynamic, bidirectional autonomic signaling between the heart, lungs, brainstem, limbic system, and higher cortical areas. This interconnected network enables conscious regulation of breathing, heart rhythms and emotions to influence autonomic and higher cortical functions. Research has demonstrated that heart rhythm patterns become more ordered during HeartMath’s® self-regulation techniques. This stable, high-oscillatory pattern, termed “coherence”, can be observed using heart rate variability biofeedback and induced through slow, deep breathing or experiencing regenerative emotions such as gratitude. Coherence is a state of physiological and emotional regulation that reflects increased vagal activity and synchronization across organ systems, promoting more efficient function. In addition to reductions in perceived stress, research has demonstrated improvements in energy, anxiety, mood, sleep, and cognitive performance with daily coherence practice over weeks. Gradually, coherent heart rhythm patterns can become a more familiar set-point for the body through repeated afferent input to the brain, supporting the emergence of a healthier, more regulated physiological baseline. This narrative review explores HeartMath as an emerging non-pharmacological intervention with therapeutic potential for emotional and physiological dysregulation, highlighting evidence and mechanisms by which coherence shifts the body toward a healthier, more resilient state.

Keywords: heart rate variability (HRV), self-regulation, trauma and stress recovery, vagal tone, biofeedback, psychophysiology, heart-brain coherence, dysregulation

Introduction

Decades of research have demonstrated that chronic stress and adversity contribute to enduring physical and mental health challenges by disrupting neuroendocrine, autonomic, and other core regulatory systems. This narrative review explores the therapeutic potential of HeartMath, a somatic and emotion-focused intervention, in addressing the emotional and physiological dysregulation that often follows adversity, trauma or chronic stress. The therapeutic application of heart rate variability (HRV) coherence biofeedback presents a promising avenue for mitigating the consequences of dysregulation, demonstrating efficacy in addressing stress, anxiety, depression, and chronic disease. HeartMath combines an innovative set of heart-focused self-regulation techniques with HRV biofeedback, enabling individuals to shift into a state of coherence—a physiological pattern marked by high-amplitude, sine wave–like HRV rhythms. With regular practice, this coherent state helps to establish a new homeostatic baseline, promoting greater parasympathetic activity, emotional stability, and physiological resilience.

As a non-pharmacological, self-directed intervention, HeartMath provides a low-risk, accessible tool with broad clinical implications for enhancing emotional and physical health across diverse populations.

Adversity, Dysregulation and Disease

A variety of studies looking at both childhood adversity and adult trauma have demonstrated a link between chronic stress and adverse health outcomes. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study was a groundbreaking study that demonstrated a dose-dependent relationship between adverse childhood experiences and various negative mental and physical health outcomes later in life. 1 This study, whose findings have since been replicated by many others, revealed that the more adverse experiences an individual has during childhood, the higher their risk of negative health outcomes in adulthood, including heart disease, cancer, and chronic lung disease, as well as mental health conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and suicide attempts. 2 In a systematic review of pediatric health outcomes, childhood adversity was associated with delays in cognitive development, asthma, somatic complaints, sleep disruption, obesity and recurrent infections. 3 In a nationally representative sample of over nine thousand older adults in the United States, those with lifetime PTSD had higher rates of hypertension, angina, heart disease, gastritis, and arthritis. 4 This wide range of health outcomes across the lifespan reflects the multiple systems impacted by a chronically activated stress response.

Decades of research have continued to underscore how excessive or prolonged activation of the body’s stress response disrupts normal development, and leads to dysregulation of neuroendocrine and other physiological systems in both adults and children.5-7 The term “allostatic load” has been used to describe the cumulative physiological “wear and tear” that results from repeated or chronic activation of the stress response leading to multisystem dysregulation over time, 5 while the term “toxic stress” is a newly defined term that characterizes the process of physiological dysregulation in response to childhood adversity. 6 Dysregulation implies imbalance in the normal control mechanisms that maintain stability and optimal functioning. For instance, dysregulation of the nervous system, a central player in the stress response, has been characterized in children with ACEs demonstrating symptomatic difficulties in executive function, emotional regulation, autonomic function, somatic function, digestion and sleep. 7 Dysregulation can also lead to the establishment of a new homeostatic set-point in the body, and be a pre-cursor to a wide range of mental and physical health conditions. Dysregulation within the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has been implicated in neuropsychiatric conditions like depression and schizophrenia, 8 while autonomic dysregulation can be found in many complex multisystem conditions such as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, fibromyalgia and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome.9,10 Stress-induced immune dysregulation has been implicated in type 2 diabetes, asthma, cardiovascular disease and some cancers. 11 While such conditions are also influenced by genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors, it is likely that stress-associated physiological dysregulation contributes to many common health problems. Further research is necessary to better characterize the dysregulated physiological patterns that lead to chronic disease.

Heart Rate Variability as a Stress Biomarker and Therapeutic Target

Stress biomarkers are measurable indicators that can provide insights into the physiological underpinnings of chronic stress and adversity. Heart rate variability (HRV), the variation in time between successive heart beats, has emerged as a leading stress biomarker that reflects autonomic activity and the ability to flexibly modulate between its 2 branches, the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. 12 The autonomic nervous system is responsible for regulating involuntary bodily functions. For instance, the sympathetic system increases heart rate, while the parasympathetic system slows it down. An optimal amount of HRV reflects greater parasympathetic regulation and supports a flexible, adaptive autonomic response that allows the body to efficiently shift between arousal and relaxation as needed. This increased parasympathetic, or vagal, activity underlies the body’s capacity for rest, recovery, and regulation, supporting functions such as digestion, immune balance, and emotional stability. Individuals with higher HRV demonstrate more effective emotional regulation and lower physiological reactivity to stress compared to those with lower HRV. 13 Two recent meta-analyses assessing HRV parameters in individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) demonstrated clear alterations in HRV indicating impaired vagal activity and sympatho-vagal imbalance.14,15 These findings support the clinical features observed in PTSD, characterized by a persistent state of heightened arousal and reduced ability to return to a baseline state of relaxation. Further to its role as a marker of autonomic function and resilience, the amount of HRV has been associated with the risk of mental and physical health conditions. Results of a meta-analysis showed that patients with major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder exhibited significantly lower HRV compared with controls. 16 In the Framingham Heart Study, HRV was a powerful prognostic biomarker for all-cause mortality, independent of other risk factors. 17 Finally, in a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients, higher HRV predicted greater chances of survival in older patients, while low HRV predicted admission to the intensive care unit within 1-week of hospitalization. 18 The establishment of HRV as a reflection of autonomic flexibility, and a modifiable predictor of disease and recovery, has rendered it a desirable target for therapeutic interventions.

Through its effects on autonomic function and emotional regulation, HRV biofeedback has become a promising tool in the treatment of both mental health conditions and chronic disease. Heart rate variability biofeedback uses a heart rate sensor and software interface that provides real-time HRV, training individuals to consciously influence their heart rhythm patterns and increase HRV through slow, steady breathing or other self-regulation techniques.

According to several meta-analyses, HRV biofeedback has demonstrated effectiveness in the management of stress and anxiety, 19 depression, 20 as well as post-traumatic stress disorder. 21 In a systematic review of HRV biofeedback in the management of adults with chronic disease, improvements were noted across multiple physical and mental health conditions including hypertension, asthma, cardiovascular prognosis, sleep, chronic pain, anxiety and cognitive performance. 22 Notably, improvements in these clinical outcomes were often accompanied by increases in HRV, highlighting HRV as a modifiable biomarker, and supporting the role of physiological regulation as a key mechanism in improving health and reducing disease risk.

While much of the previous research has suggested that the benefits of HRV biofeedback relate to an increase in parasympathetic vagal activity associated with increasing the amount of HRV, recent findings suggest that the stability of HRV oscillatory pattern is also important. A research group at the University of Southern California recently conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of different heart rate oscillatory patterns on the brain and brain-derived proteins.23-25 This study randomly assigned younger and older adults to daily HRV biofeedback to elicit either a pattern of coherent, high-amplitude heart rate oscillations using slow-paced breathing, or low-amplitude heart rate oscillations through self-selected relaxation practices aimed at maintaining a low and steady heart rate over time. After 4-5-weeks, participants who targeted the high-coherence oscillatory HRV pattern showed an increase in brain volume in a region of the hippocampus, 23 enhanced neuroimaging signals associated with cognition and arousal, 24 and desirable changes in plasma Alzheimer’s disease-related proteins. 25 While these findings are novel and warrant replication in further studies, they point to 2 potential observations: (1) The effects of generating a high-amplitude, coherent heart rate oscillatory pattern go beyond increasing autonomic flexibility, and also have a regulatory influence that is registered at the level of the brain, and (2) Slow-paced breathing at the natural coherence frequency to achieve greater stability and a wider range in HRV creates more desirable neurophysiological effects than maintaining a narrow range of heart rate, as occurs with mindfulness meditation or relaxation on its own. The latter point was further confirmed by a group of researchers at Stanford University who found that 5-minutes of controlled breathwork, especially cyclical sighing, produced greater improvements in mood and physiological arousal compared to 5-minutes of mindfulness meditation. 26 Although more research is needed, these findings suggest that practices that change afferent signaling—like slow, rhythmic breathing and coherent HRV patterns—can positively affect brain function and other neuro-chemical pathways.

HeartMath’s Coherence Model and Outcomes

The heart and brain communicate through a dynamic bidirectional system involving neural (ie. vagal and spinal pathways), hormonal (ie. adrenaline and oxytocin), mechanical (ie. baroreceptor feedback), and electromagnetic signals that are integrated within the limbic system and central autonomic network to regulate physiological and emotional states.27,28 Over the last 3 decades, research by the HeartMath Institute has helped to describe the influence of afferent signals from the heart on brain activity, emotional experience, and overall performance, and has created practical, scientifically-validated tools that combine HRV biofeedback with heart-focused techniques for self-regulation.28-30 Distinct from traditional clinical-grade and other commercially-available HRV biofeedback systems, which focus on training with paced breathing or simply calculate HRV metrics, the HeartMath system provides real-time interactive feedback that trains users in both physiological and emotional self-regulation through the generation of a coherent heart rhythm pattern.

Self-regulation refers to the ability to manage and control one’s thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and physiological responses to adapt to changing social and environmental demands. In recent years, emotional self-regulation has become an important target for therapeutic interventions including mindfulness-based stress reduction, meditation and HeartMath. The intentional activation of positive emotions such as compassion, kindness, and gratitude have been found to have a beneficial impact on the body’s physiology. These emotions trigger the release of oxytocin and serotonin, which promote feelings of well-being and social connection. Emotion-focused techniques that help individuals shift towards a state of loving kindness or gratitude have been associated with improvements in mood, anxiety, physiological indicators (heart rate, blood pressure, cortisol levels, inflammatory markers), stress recovery, and HRV.31-33 The subjective experience of positive or regenerative emotions not only counteracts the physiological effects of stress, but also facilitates and sustains a stable, high-amplitude oscillatory HRV pattern—known as heart rhythm coherence—that reflects a state of synchronized autonomic regulation and physiological efficiency. 29

Coherence is defined as a smooth, sine-wavelike heart rate variability (HRV) pattern with high amplitude, reflecting healthy physiological variability and autonomic balance. The coherence model, proposed by the HeartMath Institute, describes this HRV pattern as an inducible afferent signal transmitted throughout the body, creating a state of energetic efficiency characterized by stability, synchrony among oscillatory systems, and adaptability to changing demands. 29 Because HRV reflects the dynamic interplay between the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system, coherence indicates a regulated and efficient autonomic state. Importantly, coherence is a psychophysiological state that can be self-generated through slow, paced breathing (approximately 6 breaths per minute) and stabilized by regenerative emotions such as appreciation, care, or gratitude. 29 This state is distinct from relaxation, which is primarily characterized by parasympathetic dominance and a slower, low-amplitude HRV pattern (Figure 1B). In contrast, coherence involves a stable, high-amplitude rhythmic pattern associated with greater parasympathetic engagement and autonomic flexibility, as reflected in the HRV power spectrum (Figure 1C). High amplitude HRV rhythms represent greater beat-to-beat variation and a broader dynamic range of autonomic reactivity, whereas low-amplitude rhythms indicate less variation and more limited autonomic responsiveness. 27 Coherence reflects the degree to which heart rhythm oscillations align with the cardiovascular system’s natural resonance frequency (∼0.1 Hz). At this resonant frequency, the heart serves as a central “conductor,” entraining other oscillatory systems—such as respiration, blood pressure, and vascular tone—through baroreflex coupling, and modulating brain centers involved in emotional and cognitive processing.13,29,34 Daily practice using HRV coherence biofeedback and self-regulation techniques helps to establish coherence as a new physiological reference pattern (Figure 2), promoting more efficient integration across autonomic, emotional, and cognitive systems. Over time, this coherent pattern can become a more familiar homeostatic baseline, supporting improvements in attention, emotional regulation and physiological function. 30

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Heart rate variability tracings (left-side graphs) and power spectra (right-side graphs) demonstrating (A) Psychophysiological Incoherence as occurs when experiencing anger, (B) Relaxation, and (C) Psychophysiological Coherence as occurs when experiencing sustained regenerative emotions, such as appreciation. Psychophysiological incoherence is characterized by a lower frequency, more disordered heart rhythm pattern and increasing mean heart rate. The power spectra on the right shows this rhythm is primarily in the very low frequency range, which is typically associated with sympathetic nervous system activity. Relaxation results in a higher frequency, low amplitude rhythm indicating reduced autonomic outflow. Increased power in the high frequency range reflects increased parasympathetic activity. Psychophysiological coherence results in a highly ordered, sine wave-like heart rate variability pattern. According to the power spectra on the right, this rhythm corresponds with a large, narrow peak in the low frequency region, centered around 0.1 Hertz

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Resting-state heart rate variability (HRV) tracings of 2 subjects (“Student 1” and “Student 2”), taken at baseline (“Before intervention”) and 4-month after practicing HeartMath’s self-regulation techniques and HRV coherence biofeedback (“After 4 month intervention”). Qualitatively, baseline tracings are characterized by more chaotic or dysregulated HRV patterns, while follow-up tracings demonstrate increased amplitude and more ordered, coherent heart rhythm patterns. Qualitatively, an increase in HRV parameters is observed, including the standard deviation of inter-beat intervals (SDNN – an overall measure of HRV), high frequency power (lnHFP – a measure of vagally-mediated HRV) and Coherence (a measure of global synchrony that increases as the heart rate oscillates near the body’s natural cardiovascular frequency of approximately 0.1 Hz)

A growing number of independent studies have demonstrated significant benefits with regular practice of HeartMath’s self-regulation techniques aimed at generating a coherent heart rhythm pattern on HRV biofeedback. In a randomized, wait-list controlled trial of cancer survivors, 4-6 weeks of coherence training using HRV biofeedback was associated with increased coherence measurements and symptomatic improvements in sleep, subjective stress levels, fatigue, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. 35 In a pilot study investigating coherence training as an intervention for the treatment of chronic pain in veterans, patients who completed 4 sessions of HRV biofeedback combined with controlled breathing and the self-generation of a positive or neutral emotional state, showed statistically significant reductions in pain, stress perception, negative emotions, and physical activity limitations, associated with increased HRV coherence scores, compared to controls. 36 In a randomized-controlled study of 136 students, participants who practiced HeartMath’s emotion self-regulation techniques to generate coherence on HRV biofeedback for 4-months demonstrated statistically-significant improvements in resting-state heart rate variability parameters, including the standard deviation of inter-beat intervals (an overall measure of HRV and autonomic balance) and high frequency power (a measure of vagally-mediated HRV) (Figure 2). 37 Increases in HRV indices with coherence practice have also been observed and correlated with improvements in attention and emotion regulation in patients with chronic brain injury. 38 Finally, in a randomized controlled trial of HRV coherence training as a daily intervention for stress management in physicians, 67% of participants sustained their coherence practice with persistent stress reduction benefits 56-days after the intervention was completed, 39 indicating that these practices are effective tools that continue to be practiced and provide benefit outside of an experimental setting. The results of these studies, among others, 40 reveal that HeartMath’s self-regulation techniques and HRV coherence biofeedback offer a non-pharmacological therapeutic approach that utilizes afferent signaling of more regulated physiological patterns from the body to support emotional, mental and physical functioning.

Discussion

The heart, as both a physical organ and a metaphorical symbol of emotion, plays a significant role in the ability to regulate our physiological processes and emotions. The emerging research by the HeartMath Institute and others has explored the profound impact of self-regulation techniques combined with generating a state of coherence using HRV biofeedback. As a state of regulation within the body, coherence allows for greater autonomic flexibility, resilience and synchronization across different organ systems, which enables more efficient physiologic functioning. Research has shown that regular HeartMath practice over weeks not only reduces perceived stress, but also improves anxiety, mood, sleep, and cognitive performance. Consistent practice over months has been shown to increase overall HRV and produce smoother, higher-amplitude heart rhythm patterns that reflect greater parasympathetic activity and autonomic flexibility. Over time, smoother and more stable heart rhythm patterns can become a healthier physiological set point, reinforcing autonomic regulation and supporting more durable improvements in emotional balance, resilience, and symptom relief.

Traditional therapies that focus primarily on cognitive restructuring can be valuable in addressing the emotional and cognitive aspects of dysregulation, helping individuals understand and manage their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. However, in a literature review, non-responsiveness to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for patients with PTSD was as a high as 50%. 41 Cognitive therapies tend to engage the mind, sometimes overlooking the intertwined nature of mental, emotional and physiological dysregulation, suggesting a need for interventions that span all domains. When combined with CBT, HRV coherence biofeedback can provide additional benefit by facilitating the acquisition of cognitive-based skills and regulating emotional and physiological function. 42 Numerous studies have identified emotional and physiological dysregulation as clinical features of ACEs,43,44 childhood maltreatment, 45 PTSD,46,47 and Developmental Trauma Disorder. 48 Daily breathing practice aimed at generating the stable, high-amplitude oscillatory pattern characterized by coherence specifically targets dysregulated HRV patterns, with studies demonstrating increased HRV and oscillatory amplitude (ie, coherence) following 4-6 weeks of coherence training.35-37 Clinically, these increases in HRV are associated with symptomatic improvements in emotional self-regulation, cognitive function, sleep and chronic pain. 22 These findings are further supported by the neurovisceral integration model which describes how greater autonomic stability and flexibility, as evidenced by high resting HRV, increase the functional connectivity of emotional and cognitive brain regions through the vagus nerve and the central autonomic network.27,49,50 In this way, focused attention to modify heart rhythm patterns through paced breathing and emotion self-regulation techniques can provide clear benefit to individuals who exhibit symptoms associated with physiological and emotional dysregulation.

Emerging clinical studies on HeartMath techniques and HRV coherence biofeedback have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes, however further investigation is needed to assess their comparative efficacy alongside, or as an adjunct to, pharmacologic interventions. The focus on HRV quality and high-amplitude oscillatory patterns presents new avenues for research, and further exploration is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these patterns and their impact on neurophysiological pathways. Finally, studies to date have been limited by relatively small sample sizes, and more detailed analyses of protocol parameters, implementation contexts, and cultural factors will be important to address in future systematic reviews.

Conclusion

The effects of chronic stress, trauma and adversity are reflected in the dysregulation of neuroendocrine and other physiological systems, contributing to a spectrum of physical and mental health issues across the lifespan. Heart rate variability has emerged as a valuable stress biomarker, offering insights into autonomic activity and its association with various mental and physical health conditions. The therapeutic application of HRV coherence biofeedback presents a promising avenue for mitigating the clinical consequences of dysregulation, demonstrating efficacy in treating stress, anxiety, depression, and even chronic diseases. Regular practice using HRV coherence biofeedback and HeartMath’s self-regulation techniques over time can cultivate the state of coherence, establishing a new inner baseline that promotes physiological and emotional regulation, and a roadmap to greater health. Continued exploration of the mechanisms that underlie the physiological impact of coherence, and its long-term effects, will deepen our understanding of this intervention. Ultimately, the integration of HeartMath’s self-regulation techniques and HRV coherence biofeedback into therapeutic practices represents a noteworthy advancement, empowering individuals with a safe, non-invasive, and effective tool to enhance emotional and physiological well-being.

Footnotes

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Both authors are affiliated with the HeartMath Institute, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research and education organization. The authors declare no financial conflicts of interest related to the content of this article. Any discussion of HeartMath tools or methods reflects the authors’ expertise and institutional affiliation, but is not intended as product promotion. HeartMath’s emotional self-regulation techniques and associated HRV biofeedback devices are proprietary tools developed by the HeartMath Institute (non-profit) and HeartMath Inc. (commercial partner). The authors recognize that similar HRV biofeedback methods can be implemented using other systems based on the same physiological principles of paced breathing. While HeartMath’s platform provides integrated software and validated coherence metrics that may facilitate ease of use in clinical and research settings, cost considerations may influence accessibility.

ORCID iD

Jorina Elbers https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7509-8909

Ethical Considerations

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants.

Consent to Participate

There are no human participants in this article and informed consent is not required.

References

  • 1.Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245-258. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(8):e356-e366. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oh DL, Jerman P, Silvério Marques S, et al. Systematic review of pediatric health outcomes associated with childhood adversity. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1037-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pietrzak RH, Goldstein RB, Southwick SM, Grant BF. Physical health conditions associated with posttraumatic stress disorder in US older adults: results from wave 2 of the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(2):296-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03788.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McEwen BS. Neurobiological and systemic effects of chronic stress. Chronic Stress. 2017;1:2470547017692328. doi: 10.1177/2470547017692328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O’Connor DB, Thayer JF, Vedhara K. Stress and health: a review of psychobiological processes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021;72:663-688. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-062520-122331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elbers J, Rovnaghi C, Golianu B, Anand K. Clinical profile associated with adverse childhood experiences: the advent of nervous system dysregulation. Children. 2017;4(11):98. doi: 10.3390/children4110098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mikulska J, Juszczyk G, Gawrońska-Grzywacz M, Herbet M. HPA axis in the pathomechanism of depression and schizophrenia: new therapeutic strategies based on its participation. Brain Sci. 2021;11(10):1298. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nelson MJ, Bahl JS, Buckley JD, Thomson RL, Davison K. Evidence of altered cardiac autonomic regulation in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltim). 2019;98(43):e17600. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Staud R. Autonomic dysfunction in fibromyalgia syndrome: postural orthostatic tachycardia. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008;10(6):463-466. doi: 10.1007/s11926-008-0076-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Godbout JP, Glaser R. Stress-induced immune dysregulation: implications for wound healing, infectious disease and cancer. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2006;1(4):421-427. doi: 10.1007/s11481-006-9036-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Walker FR, Pfingst K, Carnevali L, Sgoifo A, Nalivaiko E. In the search for integrative biomarker of resilience to psychological stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;74(Pt B):310-320. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schwerdtfeger AR, Schwarz G, Pfurtscheller K, Thayer JF, Jarczok MN, Pfurtscheller G. Heart rate variability (HRV): from brain death to resonance breathing at 6 breaths/minute. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(3):676-693. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim HG, Cheon EJ, Bai DS, Lee YH, Koo BH. Stress and heart rate variability: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Psychiatry Investig. 2018;15(3):235-245. doi: 10.30773/pi.2017.08.17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nagpal ML, Gleichauf K, Jp G. Meta-analysis of heart rate variability as a psychophysiological indicator of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Treat. 2014;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.4172/2167-1222.1000182 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang Z, Luo Y, Zhang Y, et al. Heart rate variability in generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and panic disorder: a network meta-analysis and systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2023;330:259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsuji H, Larson MG, Venditti FJ, Jr, et al. Impact of reduced heart rate variability on risk for cardiac events: the framingham heart study. Circulation. 1996;94(11):2850-2855. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.94.11.2850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mol MBA, Strous MTA, Osch FHM, et al. Heart-rate-variability (HRV), predicts outcomes in COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0258841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Goessl VC, Curtiss JE, Hofmann SG. The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback training on stress and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2017;47(15):2578-2586. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717001003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pizzoli SFM, Marzorati C, Gatti D, Monzani D, Mazzocco K, Pravettoni G. A meta-analysis on heart rate variability biofeedback and depressive symptoms. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6650. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86149-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lehrer P, Kaur K, Sharma A, et al. Heart rate variability biofeedback improves emotional and physical health and performance: a systematic review and Meta analysis. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020;45(3):109-129. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fournié C, Chouchou F, Dalleau G, Caderby T, Cabrera Q, Verkindt C. Heart rate variability biofeedback in chronic disease management: a systematic review. Compl Ther Med. 2021;60:102750. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yoo HJ, Nashiro K, Dutt S, et al. Daily biofeedback to modulate heart rate oscillations affects structural volume in hippocampal subregions targeted by the locus coeruleus in older adults but not younger adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2023;132:85-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bachman SL, Cole S, Yoo HJ, et al. Daily heart rate variability biofeedback training decreases locus coeruleus MRI contrast in younger adults in a randomized clinical trial. Int J Psychophysiol. 2023;193:112241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.08.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Min J, Rouanet J, Martini AC, et al. Modulating heart rate oscillation affects plasma amyloid beta and tau levels in younger and older adults. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30167-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Balban MY, Neri E, Kogon MM, et al. Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal. Cell Rep Med. 2023;4(1):100895. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thayer JF, Åhs F, Fredrikson M, Sollers JJ, Wager TD. A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(2):747-756. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shaffer F, McCraty R, Zerr CL. A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1040. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McCraty R, Bradley RT. The coherent heart heart–brain interactions, psychophysiological coherence, and the emergence of system-wide order. Integral Review. 2009;5(2):10-115. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McCraty R, Zayas MA. Cardiac coherence, self-regulation, autonomic stability, and psychosocial well-being. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Leavy B, O’Connell BH, O’Shea D. Gratitude, affect balance, and stress buffering: a growth curve examination of cardiovascular responses to a laboratory stress task. Int J Psychophysiol. 2023;183:103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guardino CM, Schetter CD, Bower JE, Lu MC, Smalley SL. Effects of a novel positive psychological intervention on prenatal stress and well-being: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Women Birth. 2017;30(2):e111-e118. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Redwine LS, Henry BL, Pung MA, et al. Pilot randomized study of a gratitude journaling intervention on heart rate variability and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with stage B heart failure. Psychosom Med. 2016;78(6):667-676. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bates ME, Lesnewich LM, Uhouse SG, Gohel S, Buckman JF. Resonance-paced breathing alters neural response to visual cues: proof-of-concept for a neuroscience-informed adjunct to addiction treatments. Front Psychiatr. 2019;10:624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00624c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Burch JB, Ginsberg JP, McLain AC, et al. Symptom management among cancer survivors: randomized pilot intervention trial of heart rate variability biofeedback. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020;45(2):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09462-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berry ME, Chapple IT, Ginsberg JP, Gleichauf KJ, Meyer JA, Nagpal ML. Non-pharmacological intervention for chronic pain in veterans: a pilot study of heart rate variability biofeedback. Glob Adv Health Med. 2014;3(2):28-33. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bradley RT, McCraty R, Atkinson M, Tomasino D, Daugherty A, Arguelles L. Emotion self-regulation, psychophysiological coherence, and test anxiety: results from an experiment using electrophysiological measures. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2010;35(4):261-283. doi: 10.1007/s10484-010-9134-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim S, Zemon V, Cavallo MM, Rath JF, McCraty R, Foley FW. Heart rate variability biofeedback, executive functioning and chronic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(2):209-222. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.729292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lemaire JB, Wallace JE, Lewin AM, De Grood J, Schaefer JP. The effect of a biofeedback-based stress management tool on physician stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Open Med. 2011;5(4):e154-e163. PubMed Central. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3345375/ Accessed 1 April 2025. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Field DL. A systematic review of HeartMath interventions to improve psychological outcomes in individuals with psychiatric conditions. Integral Review. 2021;17(1):69-89. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kar N. Cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: a review. Neuropsychiatric Dis Treat. 2011;7:167-181. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S10389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Criswell SR, Sherman R, Krippner S. Cognitive behavioral therapy with heart rate variability biofeedback for adults with persistent noncombat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Perm J. 2018;22(4):17-207. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Demakakos P, Steptoe A. Adverse childhood experiences and diurnal cortisol patterns in older people in England. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022;142:105798. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wong KE, Wade TJ, Moore J, et al. Examining the relationships between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), cortisol, and inflammation among young adults. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2022;25:100516. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Young-Southward G, Svelnys C, Gajwani R, Bosquet Enlow M, Minnis H. Child maltreatment, autonomic nervous system responsivity, and psychopathology: current state of the literature and future directions. Child Maltreat. 2020;25(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/1077559519848497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Siciliano RE, Anderson AS, Compas BE. Autonomic nervous system correlates of posttraumatic stress symptoms in youth: meta-analysis and qualitative review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2022;92:102125. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sbisa AM, Madden K, Toben C, McFarlane AC, Dell L, Lawrence-Wood E. Potential peripheral biomarkers associated with the emergence and presence of posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology: a systematic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023;147:105954. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cruz D, Lichten M, Berg K, George P. Developmental trauma: conceptual framework, associated risks and comorbidities, and evaluation and treatment. Front Psychiatr. 2022;13:800687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.800687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thome J, Densmore M, Frewen PA, et al. Desynchronization of autonomic response and central autonomic network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;38(1):27-40. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Park G, Thayer JF. From the heart to the mind: cardiac vagal tone modulates top-down and bottom-up visual perception and attention to emotional stimuli. Front Psychol. 2014;5:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES