Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Dec 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Serv Psychol. 2025 Sep 4;51(3):143–154. doi: 10.1007/s42843-025-00133-7

Discipline, Love, and Authenticity: A Psychologist’s Guide to Coaching Parents

Antonio F Pagán 1
PMCID: PMC12724525  NIHMSID: NIHMS2127090  PMID: 41445774

Abstract

Teaching parents effective parenting strategies has several challenges for therapists, often stemming from family dynamics and ineffective discipline. Harsh punishment, inconsistency, and permissiveness can worsen behaviors, highlighting the need for structured, supportive parenting. Authoritative parenting, with warmth and consistency, fosters positive development. Therapists play a key role in helping parents regulate emotions, avoid disciplinary hypocrisy, and adapt strategies across developmental stages. By equipping parents with practical tools, therapy can strengthen parent-child relationships, reduce opposition, and promote long-term behavioral resilience.

Keywords: Parenting, Emotional regulation, Discipline, Psychological resilience, Behavioral interventions

Clinical Vignette

Maria, a 42-year-old mother, slumped onto the therapy couch, her voice tight with frustration. “It’s just… every day is a battle with Ethan,” she sighed. “This morning, I asked him to put his dishes in the dishwasher for the tenth time, and he just rolled his eyes and walked away.” Ethan, her 15-year-old son, has become increasingly defiant over the past year, refusing to follow household rules, ignoring curfews, and frequently arguing with Maria. “He knows he has a curfew of 10 PM on school nights,” Maria explained, her hands gesturing emphatically, “but last night he didn’t walk in until 11:30! When I asked where he had been, he just mumbled something about being with friends and stomped up to his room. It’s like he doesn’t respect me at all.” She describes him as “impossible to manage” and expresses frustration that “no matter what I do, he doesn’t listen.” Maria acknowledges that Ethan’s behavior has worsened since adolescence, and she feels helpless in her attempts to regain control. “I just want to know how to fix his emotional regulation issues,” she pleaded, “I really believe that with the right intervention, the problems could be undone.” This pattern of Maria making demands and Ethan ignoring them, followed by Maria feeling helpless and escalating her attempts to control him, illustrates a maladaptive interaction that maintains Ethan’s defiance by creating a cycle of resistance and parental frustration.

In the initial sessions, Maria talks about how she feel s“helpless”and“exhausted.”She has tried everything from strict rules to pleading with Ethan, but nothing seems to work. Ethan’s poor emotional regulation, impulsivity, and disregard for authority are sources of constant stress. Maria believes that a psychologist should be able to “fix” these behaviors. She admits that she has always been a very strict parent, with high expectations of her son, but that he seems to be pushing back more and more as he gets older. The therapist recognizes the recurring theme of parents bringing their children in expecting“fixes”to years of poor regulation. This is often the case for parents like Maria, who have relied heavily on traditional authoritarian parenting strategies (e.g.,“because I said so”) in early childhood and are now unsure how to adapt their approach for a teenager. The therapist starts by gently addressing the gap between Maria’s expectations and reality and explains that emotional regulation issues and poor behavior don’t get “fixed” overnight—they are often the result of years of ineffective parenting strategies. However, it’s never too late to implement new approaches that teach both discipline and love.

Background and Challenges

Therapists frequently encounter parents who struggle with managing oppositional behavior in their children, particularly as they enter adolescence. Parents often seek immediate solutions, hoping that therapy will“fix”defiant behaviors, emotional dysregulation, and conduct problems. However, research suggests that oppositional behaviors can be associated with certain ineffective parenting approaches (Rostami & Saadati, 2018). Ineffective parenting approaches, such as harsh discipline, inconsistent rules, and permissive parenting styles, have been linked to increased behavioral problems in children (Tung & Lee, 2014). This underscores the importance of shifting from reactive, punishment-based strategies to proactive, value-driven parenting that fosters emotional regulation and resilience.

The initial presentation of Maria’s case, with her focus on a quick “fix” and her history of strict parenting, aligns with the common challenges therapists face. The therapist highlights that good parenting, regardless of age, should always contain two core elements: a lot of discipline and a lot of love. Early on, discipline involves clear, firm boundaries, which are necessary for children to learn self-regulation. However, as children grow, the nature of discipline must shift. The therapist explains how this shift should occur, particularly in adolescence, when the focus should move toward explaining why rules are important rather than simply enforcing them. “Think of it this way,” the therapist says, “When Ethan was younger, you probably told him ‘no’ when he wanted to touch something hot or dangerous because you were protecting him. Now, as a teenager, he’s looking for reasons why rules matter, not just commands. If you’re asking him to follow curfews, for example, it’s about explaining how this helps him stay safe, be responsible, and respect family time. At this stage, it’s not about telling him what to do, it’s about teaching him why those things are important for his development and safety.” The therapist also touches on the issue of hypocrisy in parenting, which can sometimes be unintentional but harmful nonetheless. “Often, parents expect their children to follow rules that they themselves don’t consistently model. This can lead to children hearing one thing and seeing another, which makes the rules seem performative rather than meaningful,” the therapist explains. For example, Maria admits she often tells Ethan to“respect your elders”but then becomes irritated with her own parents or others when they challenge her. The therapist gently points out that Ethan may be seeing the incongruity and may not take the rule seriously because he doesn’t see his mother living it out. To address this, the therapist suggests that Maria start reflecting on her own behavior and how she can model the values she’s asking Ethan to adopt. “Good parenting doesn’t just involve telling your child to follow the rules; it means showing them how those rules are connected to core values and demonstrating them in your own actions,” the therapist advises.

A key challenge therapists face is guiding parents to move beyond short-term behavioral management and towards long-term strategies that nurture self-regulation and accountability in children. Moreover, studies indicate that supportive environments, including positive peer relationships, can mitigate the impact of negative parenting practices (Tung & Lee, 2014). Given that oppositional behaviors often emerge in response to both parental discipline styles and broader social contexts, therapists must equip parents with tools to create a stable and supportive home environment while adapting their parenting strategies as their children develop.

One of the biggest hurdles in working with parents of oppositional children is addressing the frustration and exhaustion that often accompany these challenges. Many parents feel powerless when traditional discipline techniques fail, leading them to either escalate punishment or withdraw altogether. Research suggests that authoritarian parenting, characterized by high control and low warmth, is associated with increased externalizing behaviors such as defiance and aggression (Rostami & Saadati, 2018). Conversely, permissive parenting, which lacks structure and consistent consequences, has also been linked to heightened oppositional behavior. This highlights the need for a balanced approach—one that combines firm boundaries with emotional support and guidance.

A critical role therapists can have is to provide practical guidance on coaching parents to manage oppositional behaviors effectively. By integrating evidence-based parenting strategies, therapists can help parents shift from a reactive mindset to a proactive, values-based approach. Additionally, therapists can help parents tailor strategies to the developmental stage of the child, recognizing that interventions effective for young children may not be suitable for adolescents (Florean et al., 2020). By fostering a deeper understanding of the parent-child dynamic, therapists can empower parents to build stronger relationships with their children while reducing conflict and opposition.

Furthermore, therapists can help parents recognize their own emotional responses to oppositional behavior. Research has shown that parental stress, frustration, and feelings of incompetence can contribute to inconsistent discipline and negative interactions with children (McGoron & Ondersma, 2015). By equipping parents with skills to regulate their own emotions and approach conflicts with greater patience and clarity, therapists can support more effective parenting interventions. Additionally, the role of online parent training programs will be discussed, as emerging research suggests that these interventions, when paired with therapist support, can be effective in helping parents implement structured strategies at home (Florean et al., 2020; Spencer et al., 2020).

By understanding evidence-based strategies that link research to clinical practice, therapists can more effectively support parents in managing oppositional behaviors. Central to this approach is the promotion of emotional regulation, the cultivation of positive parent-child relationships, and the implementation of adaptive discipline strategies. A critical challenge observed in clinical practice is that parents often apply parenting strategies in a reverse chronological order, leading to ineffective discipline and heightened opposition. Specifically, many parents adopt authoritarian strategies—characterized by high control and low warmth—during adolescence, while employing permissive or inconsistent approaches during childhood. However, research suggests that this approach is misaligned with optimal developmental outcomes (Sun et al., 2025).

Practice Considerations

Parenting Styles

An authoritative parenting style, which balances high strictness with high warmth, has been consistently linked to positive developmental outcomes in both childhood and adolescence (Martínez et al., 2019). In early childhood, authoritative parenting requires parents to model and internalize the values they wish to instill, ensuring that discipline is grounded in consistency and nurturance rather than punitive control. As children transition into adolescence—a period marked by increased autonomy and identity exploration—disciplinary strategies should evolve to incorporate open dialogue and reasoning, reinforcing rules through a values-based framework rather than rigid control (Van Heel et al., 2019). This shift acknowledges that adolescence is a critical period for personality development, during which individuals challenge societal norms, refine their self-concept, and seek greater independence (Arnett, 2015). Authoritarian parenting, characterized by high demands and low responsiveness, may be more common in early childhood to establish safety and basic rules, but it can lead to resentment and rebellion in adolescence. Permissive parenting, with low demands and high responsiveness, may seem nurturing but often lacks the structure children need to develop self-regulation, especially as they mature.

Recent research highlights that parenting styles characterized by warmth and reasoning—such as the authoritative styles—foster healthier social and psychological outcomes in adolescents compared to authoritarian and neglectful approaches, which rely on control and emotional detachment (Kuppens & Ceulemans, 2019). However, permissive parenting, where parents are highly responsive but make few demands, can also be detrimental. While seemingly loving, this style often results in children who lack self-discipline and struggle with authority. These children may have difficulty following rules and understanding boundaries, leading to behavioral issues and difficulties in social settings. Given that personality traits established in adolescence often persist into adulthood, parenting strategies during this stage play a crucial role in shaping long-term well-being (Metwally, 2018). Thus, therapists must guide parents in adjusting their disciplinary approaches over time—encouraging structure and consistency in early childhood while fostering autonomy-supportive discussions in adolescence. By integrating these principles, therapists can help parents create a home environment that promotes emotional resilience, accountability, and positive behavioral outcomes.

Characteristics of Oppositional Behavior

Oppositional behavior is characterized by persistent patterns of defiance, resistance to authority, emotional dysregulation, impulsivity, and an overall disregard for rules. Children displaying oppositional tendencies often engage in frequent power struggles, challenge parental directives, and demonstrate difficulty managing their emotions. While some level of defiance is developmentally appropriate, chronic oppositional behavior can significantly disrupt family dynamics and contribute to broader social and emotional challenges.

The root causes of oppositional behavior are multifaceted, often stemming from a combination of environmental stressors, emotional dysregulation, and inconsistencies in parenting approaches. Research suggests that ineffective discipline strategies, such as inconsistent enforcement of rules or the overuse of punitive measures, can exacerbate oppositional tendencies (Baumrind et al., 2010). Additionally, psychological control—characterized by parental intrusiveness, guilt induction (e.g.,“After all I’ve done for you…”), love withdrawal (e.g., ignoring a child’s attempts to communicate), and manipulation (e.g.,“If you really loved me, you would…”)—has been linked to increased oppositional defiance and externalizing behaviors. These tactics undermine a child’s autonomy and emotional security, fostering anxiety, depression, and resentment. They erode trust and create a climate of fear and insecurity in the parent-child relationship. Conversely, behavioral control, which involves setting clear and consistent expectations, is associated with more positive developmental outcomes when applied in an age-appropriate and structured manner (Kakihara & Tilton-Weaver, 2009).

Parental Expectations vs. Reality

Parents often seek professional support for oppositional behavior with the expectation of quick solutions, hoping for immediate improvements in compliance and behavior. However, oppositional behaviors are typically the result of long-standing interaction patterns between parents and children, making them resistant to rapid change. Many parents unknowingly contribute to the persistence of oppositional behavior through inconsistent discipline, reinforcement of negative behaviors, or a reliance on authoritarian control that lacks warmth and responsiveness (Baumrind et al., 2010; Smetana, 2017).

Research indicates that the parent-child relationship is a bidirectional process, where children’s behaviors influence parenting styles just as much as parenting styles shape children’s behaviors (Moilanen et al., 2015). For example, children who display high levels of defiance may elicit harsher disciplinary responses from their parents, which can further entrench oppositional behaviors rather than mitigate them. Studies also suggest that adolescent behavior has a stronger effect on parenting styles than the reverse, highlighting the importance of addressing oppositional tendencies early in development to prevent escalating cycles of coercive interactions (Moilanen et al., 2015).

Furthermore, parental monitoring—often viewed as a key protective factor against problem behaviors—must be implemented with caution. Overly intrusive or psychologically controlling monitoring strategies can foster secrecy, resentment, and reduced adolescent disclosure, ultimately diminishing parental influence (Kerr et al., 2010). In contrast, warm and supportive parent-adolescent relationships encourage voluntary disclosure, which has been linked to lower levels of externalizing problems and improved behavioral regulation (Tilton-Weaver et al., 2010).

The Importance of a Long-Term Approach

Effectively addressing oppositional behavior requires a long-term approach that prioritizes emotional regulation, responsibility, and the internalization of values through consistent and developmentally appropriate parenting strategies. Baumrind’s parenting typologies underscores the benefits of authoritative parenting, which balances high responsiveness with firm but reasonable expectations (Smetana, 2017). Unlike authoritarian parenting, which relies on coercive power and strict control, authoritative parenting fosters autonomy while maintaining structure, promoting healthier emotional and social development (Smetana, 2017). The effectiveness of behavioral control depends on its application. While clear parental expectations and rule enforcement can guide children toward responsible behavior, excessive control—especially when combined with psychological pressure—can lead to maladjustment and increased defiance (Smetana, 2017). Parents must shift their strategies over time, recognizing that young children benefit most from structure combined with modeled values, while adolescents require discussions rooted in a values-based framework to understand the rationale behind rules and expectations. Ultimately, therapists play a critical role in guiding parents toward sustainable and evidence-based parenting strategies. By helping parents shift from reactionary discipline to proactive and developmentally appropriate approaches, interventions can foster long-term improvements in both child behavior and family relationships.

Cultural Influences on Oppositional Behavior and Parenting Approaches

Cultural values significantly shape parenting practices, expectations, and the ways in which oppositional behavior is interpreted and managed (Bornstein, 2019). For example, Chinese parenting has traditionally been characterized as authoritarian and punitive, influenced by Confucian ideals that emphasize strictness and child training. However, empirical research has found that extreme forms of authoritarian parenting, such as the so-called“tiger parenting,”are relatively rare and often associated with poorer child adjustment, whereas supportive parenting is more common and linked to better developmental outcomes (Smetana, 2017). The authoritative parenting—low levels of harsh discipline and psychological control but high levels of support, behavioral control, and parental knowledge of activities—is associated with better adolescent adjustment, supporting the notion that authoritative parenting, with its balance of warmth and structure, remains beneficial across cultures (Smetana, 2017). However, cultural expectations regarding parental authority and discipline influence how these parenting dimensions manifest. In collectivist cultures, such as many Latino and Middle Eastern communities, values like respeto (respect) and familism emphasize obedience and interdependence, which may lead parents to adopt more controlling approaches to maintain family cohesion. While psychological control has been linked to negative developmental outcomes across cultures (Smetana, 2017), research suggests that behavioral control—clear expectations, monitoring, and structure—can provide a protective framework, particularly in high-risk environments. The goal is not necessarily to impose a uniform parenting style across cultures, but rather for clinicians to adopt a culturally sensitive lens, understanding the cultural context of parenting practices and helping families adapt evidence-based strategies in a way that aligns with their values and promotes positive child development within their cultural framework.

These findings highlight the importance of culturally responsive interventions when working with diverse families. It is crucial to acknowledge the diversity within and across cultural groups, including the experiences of under-represented communities such as Black/African American families, whose parenting practices and responses to oppositional behavior may be influenced by unique historical, social, and economic factors. Research suggests that parenting styles within Black/African American families are diverse and often characterized by a balance of warmth and strictness, which can serve as protective factors in navigating systemic challenges. Rather than imposing Western parenting norms, clinicians should recognize the adaptive functions of different parenting styles in specific cultural contexts and help parents integrate evidence-based strategies in ways that align with their values. By promoting a balance between structure and emotional support, interventions can foster positive child development while respecting cultural traditions.

Furthermore, cultural norms can significantly influence the use and perception of disciplinary practices, including corporal punishment. The definition and understanding of corporal punishment can vary across cultures, and its perceived utility and acceptability are deeply embedded in cultural traditions and beliefs. While research in some Western contexts has raised concerns about its long-term impact, the role and implications of corporal punishment within diverse cultural frameworks require careful and nuanced consideration, without definitive conclusions on its universal utility. Clinicians should approach discussions about discipline with cultural humility, recognizing the complex interplay between cultural norms, parenting practices, and child development.

Balancing Discipline and Love – The Foundation of Effective Parenting

Discipline and love are both essential components of effective parenting, working together to create a secure and structured environment for children. Discipline involves setting clear, firm boundaries and enforcing consistent consequences. When discipline is implemented appropriately, it teaches children self-regulation, responsibility, and the ability to navigate social expectations (Lunkenheimer et al., 2023). However, discipline that is harsh or inconsistent can lead to negative developmental outcomes, such as emotional dysregulation and behavioral problems (Deater-Deckard et al., 2012).

Equally important is love, which provides the emotional safety necessary for children to develop trust and resilience. Love fosters secure attachment, allowing children to explore their environment confidently while knowing they have a reliable support system. Research suggests that parent-child coregulation—where parents help children regulate emotions through warm and responsive interactions—plays a crucial role in mitigating the effects of discipline and promoting positive adjustment (Lunkenheimer et al., 2023).

Balancing discipline and love is critical to avoiding power struggles and fostering a healthy parent-child relationship. When discipline is administered with warmth and consistency, children are more likely to internalize rules rather than resist them out of fear or frustration. Parents who struggle with self-regulation may find it difficult to maintain this balance. Interventions targeting parental self-regulation (PSR) have been shown to reduce coercive discipline and promote more constructive parenting strategies (Prinz et al., 2016).

Avoiding Hypocrisy in Parenting

One of the common pitfalls of parenting is unintentional hypocrisy—when parents set expectations for their children that they do not follow themselves. Children are keen observers and quickly recognize inconsistencies between what parents say and what they do. For example, if a parent emphasizes the importance of emotional regulation but frequently reacts with anger and frustration, the child learns that emotional outbursts are an acceptable response to stress. Similarly, if parents demand respect but model dismissive or coercive communication, children may struggle to develop genuine respect for authority figures. To avoid hypocrisy, parents should actively model the behaviors they want to see in their children. This includes demonstrating emotional regulation, practicing respectful communication, and being consistent with rules and consequences. Research on PSR suggests that parents who develop better self-regulation skills are more likely to engage in positive discipline strategies and avoid reactive, impulsive responses to their child’s misbehavior (Gershoff et al., 2017).

Shifting Parenting Strategies Through Developmental Stages

As children grow and develop, parenting strategies must adapt to meet their changing needs. A one-size-fits-all approach to discipline and guidance is ineffective, as children’s cognitive, emotional, and social capacities evolve over time.

In early childhood, a more directive (authoritarian) approach is often necessary to establish clear rules and expectations. At this stage, children require structured environments where consequences for misbehavior are immediate and consistent. Research suggests that young children benefit from parents who can persist at difficult goals, delay gratification, and inhibit impulsive disciplinary responses (Crandall et al., 2015). Parents with poor self-regulation may struggle to enforce rules consistently, leading to either overly harsh or permissive discipline (Deater-Deckard & Bell, 2017). As children enter adolescence, their cognitive and social capacities expand, requiring a shift to a more explanatory (authoritative) approach. Rather than simply enforcing rules, parents must begin to explain why rules matter and engage adolescents in discussions about values and decision-making. PSR remains essential during adolescence, particularly in maintaining emotional control during conflicts. Studies suggest that parents who can regulate their emotions effectively are less likely to engage in coercive or punitive discipline and more likely to use problem-solving strategies that encourage autonomy and responsibility in their children (Azar et al., 2008). Additionally, parent-child coregulation continues to play a role in this stage, as adolescents still rely on their parents for emotional guidance, even as they seek greater independence (Lunkenheimer et al., 2023).

By adjusting parenting strategies according to developmental stages, parents can create a supportive environment that fosters both discipline and emotional security.

The Role of Values in Parenting Using an ACT Framework

Parenting, particularly during adolescence, should focus not just on enforcing rules but on guiding children to internalize core values such as respect, responsibility, and kindness. This values-based approach helps children develop a stronger sense of autonomy, guided by internalized beliefs rather than external directives (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Using an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) framework, parents can help their children align their behavior with their values, encouraging independent decision-making. The primary focus of ACT is to increase psychological flexibility—the ability to contact the present moment fully as a conscious human being, and to persist or change behavior when doing so serves chosen values. Rather than focusing on eliminating difficult thoughts and feelings, ACT aims to help individuals accept these experiences and commit to actions aligned with their core values, leading to a richer and more meaningful life. In the context of parenting, ACT provides a framework for parents to navigate the challenges of raising children with greater awareness and intention, respond to difficult child behaviors from a place of values rather than reactivity, and model psychological flexibility—the ability to act in accordance with one’s values even in the face of difficult emotions—for their children (Hayes, 2004). This flexibility supports adolescents in building a solid foundation of self-determination, which is essential as they begin to forge their own belief systems and identities.

During adolescence, when children increasingly explore their own beliefs and values, parents play a crucial role in helping them navigate these changes. By shifting from merely imposing rules to supporting their children in identifying and acting according to their values, parents can foster a sense of purpose and self-efficacy in their children. This approach aligns with self-determination theory, which posits that autonomy, competence, and relatedness are essential for optimal development (Deci & Ryan, 2012). When parents use an ACT-based approach to encourage value-driven behavior, they help their children become more self-determined and capable of navigating the complexities of adolescence.

How to Help Parents Teach Values

Help Parents Identify Their Own Values

To help parents identify and clarify their values, therapists can guide them through values clarification exercises. For example, parents can reflect on questions like:“What qualities do I want to instill in my child?”,“What kind of relationship do I want to have with my child?”, and“What principles are most important to me in life?”. Another exercise involves presenting parents with a list of common values (e.g., compassion, honesty, connection) and asking them to rank their top five. Once values are identified, parents can explore how these values can be applied in specific parenting situations. For instance, if a parent values“patience,”they can consciously practice taking a breath before reacting to a child’s frustrating behavior.

Explain Why Rules Matter

One of the key elements of values-based parenting is helping children understand the why behind rules, especially as they grow older. Adolescents begin to question authority and seek reasoning behind the rules they follow (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Parents can use this developmental stage as an opportunity to foster critical thinking by explaining the values that underpin rules. For example, instead of merely instructing a child to help with chores, parents can discuss how contributing to the household promotes respect for others and responsibility, both of which are key values. By explaining the rationale behind the rules, parents not only encourage independent thinking but also increase their child’s self-efficacy.

Use Real-Life Examples

Parents can model values by using real-life situations to demonstrate how values like responsibility and respect guide behavior. Research on motivational interviewing (MI) suggests that exploring how values influence behavior helps build intrinsic motivation (Miller & Rollnick, 2023). For example, parents can use moments such as grocery shopping, volunteering, or resolving conflicts to highlight how actions align with personal values. This approach encourages adolescents to internalize the connection between their behavior and their core values, thereby fostering self-regulation and social competence.

The Shift From Control to Guidance

Parenting should evolve from a controlling (authoritarian) approach to one that fosters autonomy through guidance. A guiding, authoritative parenting style—characterized by mutual respect and open communication—has been linked to better psychological adjustment and higher self-efficacy in adolescents (Theresya et al., 2018). In line with this shift, parents can adopt a coaching mindset, wherein their role is to help their children reflect on their values and guide them in making decisions that align with those values, rather than simply enforcing compliance. This approach nurtures ACT psychological flexibility (Hayes, 2004), which helps adolescents navigate the complexities of their emotions while remaining committed to their values.

Shifting from control to guidance also means accepting that mistakes are part of the learning process. Research in ACT has shown that fostering psychological flexibility—allowing children to experience discomfort while encouraging action based on their values—leads to better behavioral outcomes, including reduced externalizing behaviors (Byrne et al., 2021). By encouraging self-reflection and responsibility, parents can cultivate an environment where adolescents are empowered to make their own decisions based on their internalized values, ultimately enhancing their sense of self-determination and competence (Byrne et al., 2021).

Integrating values-based parenting using an ACT framework can significantly enhance the way parents’ guide their adolescents through the complexities of this developmental stage. By helping children internalize core values, explaining the reasoning behind rules, and shifting from control to guidance, parents can promote autonomy, responsibility, and self-determination in their children. Additionally, as ACT interventions for parents have shown promise in reducing stress and promoting psychological flexibility (Byrne et al., 2021), applying these principles can provide a powerful tool for fostering healthier parent-child relationships and more adaptive adolescent behaviors. This approach is grounded in solid psychological theories and has the potential to create long-lasting, positive changes for both parents and their children.

Focus on Emotional Connection

Maintaining an emotional connection with oppositional children and adolescents is essential for fostering open communication and reducing defiant behaviors. When children feel emotionally safe and valued, they are more likely to engage in meaningful conversations and be receptive to parental guidance. Research on ACT suggests that psychological flexibility—the ability to remain open and engaged even in the face of distressing emotions—is associated with adaptive parenting approaches (Byrne et al., 2021). By prioritizing emotional connection over immediate behavioral control, parents can create a space where their child feels heard and understood, which can decrease oppositional responses. Parents can put this into practice by actively listening to their child’s concerns without judgment, validating their feelings even if they don’t agree with their behavior (e.g.,“I hear you’re really upset about the curfew”). They can also make time for shared activities, express affection verbally and physically, and approach conflicts with curiosity rather than anger. Focusing on understanding the emotion behind the behavior can often lead to more effective long-term behavioral change than immediate attempts at control. Instead of reacting with frustration, parents can use moments of conflict as opportunities to reinforce their relationship by acknowledging their child’s emotions and encouraging self-reflection.

Grace and Courage in Parenting

Parenting requires a balance of grace and courage. Grace involves approaching a child’s mistakes with compassion and understanding, recognizing that children will make mistakes and that parenting is not about expecting perfection from our children but about fostering growth. ACT emphasizes that parents who engage in experiential avoidance—attempting to suppress or ignore difficult emotions—may struggle to guide their children effectively (Hayes, 2004). Instead, adopting an ACT-informed approach encourages parents to respond with mindfulness and acceptance, allowing them to model emotional regulation and resilience for their child. Parenting is also often accompanied by difficult emotions like shame and guilt. Parents may feel shame when their child misbehaves publicly or guilt when they feel they have made a parenting mistake. Grace in this context involves self-compassion—recognizing that all parents make mistakes and that these feelings are a normal part of the process. Instead of getting stuck in self-criticism, parents can practice acceptance of these feelings and focus on learning and moving forward.

Courage, on the other hand, means addressing a child’s behavior when it does not align with their stated values, while maintaining a supportive and non-punitive tone. ACT-based interventions emphasize the importance of values-driven parenting, where behavioral change is guided by intrinsic values rather than avoidance of discomfort (Byrne et al., 2021). For instance, when a child is dishonest, a parent might say, “I know you’ve said you value honesty, but I can tell you didn’t tell me the truth about what happened.” This approach allows the parent to gently challenge the behavior without instilling shame, reinforcing the child’s sense of integrity and accountability.

Parenting Skills in Action

When faced with challenging behaviors, parents can utilize the following strategies in the moment. They can begin by acknowledging and validating their child’s emotions, such as saying,“I see you’re really angry right now,”which can help de-escalate the situation by making the child feel heard. Before reacting, it is helpful for parents to take a brief pause to regulate their own emotions, perhaps by taking a deep breath or a moment of silence, as responding from a calm state allows for more thoughtful and values-driven actions. Prioritizing emotional connection over immediate correction is also key; parents can try to understand the underlying need or feeling driving the behavior by asking open-ended questions like,“What’s going on?”. Once the situation has de-escalated, parents can connect the behavior to family or personal values, for example, by saying,“In our family, we value treating each other with respect. Let’s try to talk about this in a way that shows respect”if a child has spoken disrespectfully. When appropriate, offering the child choices within acceptable boundaries can foster a sense of autonomy and cooperation, such as asking,“You need to get your homework done now. Would you like to start with math or English?”. Finally, parents can express their feelings and needs clearly and respectfully using“I”statements, like“I feel frustrated when I’m interrupted when I’m talking,”which models healthy communication and avoids blaming.

Values, emotional regulation, and self-reflection can manifest daily in several ways. Parents can consciously model the values they wish to instill in their children through their own actions, such as showing kindness to others, taking responsibility for mistakes, and practicing honesty. They can also openly manage their own emotions in healthy ways, demonstrating how to cope with stress, frustration, and sadness, perhaps by verbalizing their feelings calmly or taking breaks when overwhelmed. Engaging in regular self-reflection allows parents to consider whether their responses aligned with their values and identify areas for growth, asking themselves,“Did I respond in a way that I feel good about, and that reflects my values?”. Regularly scheduled family meetings can provide a space to discuss values, address challenges collaboratively, and make decisions together, reinforcing a values-based approach in everyday life.

Parents can also benefit from specific behavioral interventions and decision-making strategies. Focusing on positive reinforcement by acknowledging and praising desired behaviors encourages their repetition, with specific praise being more effective, such as,“I really appreciate how you helped your sibling without being asked.”Establishing clear and consistent consequences for behaviors that violate family rules or values is important, ensuring consequences are logical and age-appropriate. When conflicts arise, involving the child in finding solutions teaches problem-solving skills and fosters collaboration. For younger children, visual aids like behavior charts can help track progress towards goals and make expectations clear.

The Role of Parent Reflection

Parents play a critical role in modeling the values they want their children to adopt. Research has shown that parental psychological flexibility is linked to lower rates of youth externalizing and internalizing behaviors (Byrne et al., 2021). This suggests that parents who engage in self-reflection and practice consistency in their own behaviors build stronger trust and respect in the parent-child relationship. It is also important to acknowledge that factors such as partner conflict, family violence, and parental mental health issues like depression or substance use can significantly impair a parent’s capacity to provide consistent and supportive care.

Reflecting on one’s parenting approach through the lens of ACT can help parents align their responses with their core values rather than reacting impulsively. For example, if a parent values patience but finds themselves frequently losing their temper, they can acknowledge this discrepancy and work towards more mindful reactions. To help parents explore and align their behaviors with personal or family values, therapists can encourage them to keep a parenting journal, noting situations that triggered strong emotional reactions and reflecting on whether their response aligned with their values. They can also engage in mindfulness exercises to increase awareness of their thoughts and feelings in the moment, creating space for a more values-driven response. Regular self-assessment using questions like,“Did my actions in that situation reflect my values of connection and respect?”can facilitate greater alignment between values and behavior. Given the impact of parental well-being on parenting capacity, it is crucial to emphasize the importance of parents’self-regulation and encourage them to seek support when needed, particularly for serious concerns such as substance misuse or mental health challenges. This process of self-awareness and adjustment reinforces not only their own emotional regulation but also their child’s ability to manage emotions effectively. Furthermore, research highlights those interventions addressing parental mental health and stress contribute to better outcomes for children (Byrne et al., 2021). By prioritizing their own emotional well-being, parents can create a more stable and nurturing environment, ultimately fostering resilience and emotional growth in their children.

Helping Parents Adjust Their Expectations

Therapists play a crucial role in guiding parents to adjust their expectations about immediate behavioral changes in their children. Many parents expect rapid improvements in compliance or self-regulation, but developmental and psychological research suggests that behavioral change is a gradual process requiring sustained effort and consistency (Lunkenheimer et al., 2023). Parents who struggle with emotional regulation often resort to harsh discipline due to frustration (Lunkenheimer et al., 2023), which can undermine long-term behavioral progress. Therapists should encourage a long-term perspective, emphasizing the importance of reinforcing positive behaviors and providing structure while being patient with setbacks.

Facilitating Parent Self-Reflection

Parents’ ability to regulate their own emotions and cognitions is closely linked to their discipline strategies (Deater-Deckard & Bell, 2017). Therapists should guide parents through self-reflective exercises that help them recognize their emotional triggers and how their parenting style affects their child’s behavior. Teaching mindfulness and emotional regulation techniques can help parents remain calm and consistent in their responses, reducing impulsive discipline strategies. Encouraging parents to track their disciplinary responses in a journal can also foster awareness of patterns in their reactions.

Parent-Child Communication Strategies

Effective communication strategies can help parents reduce conflict and foster better relationships with their children. Therapists can equip parents with tools to break this cycle, such as encouraging parents to listen attentively to their child’s concerns without interrupting, which promotes mutual respect, teaching parents to acknowledge their child’s emotions, even when they disagree with their behavior, can help de-escalate conflicts, and phrasing concerns in a way that expresses personal feelings rather than placing blame (e.g.,“I feel frustrated when you don’t follow instructions”instead of“You never listen”) can reduce defensiveness and promote cooperative problem-solving. These strategies can help parents move away from punitive discipline and foster a more supportive, regulatory role in their child’s development.

Final Thoughts and Considerations

Addressing oppositional behavior in children requires ongoing collaboration between therapists and parents. Research suggests that harsh discipline often results from parents’ difficulties with self-regulation. By working together, therapists can help parents recognize their regulatory challenges and implement strategies that reduce impulsive discipline and promote positive parent-child interactions. Furthermore, parenting is a dynamic process that requires continuous growth and adaptation to a child’s developmental needs.

The ultimate goal of parenting is not to control children but to equip them with the skills necessary for self-regulation, responsibility, and emotional resilience. By supporting parents in improving their own self-regulation and fostering constructive communication, therapists can help families break negative cycles and create a more positive and nurturing environment for children.

Vignette Wrap-Up

After several months of therapy, Maria has made significant strides in adjusting her approach to parenting Ethan. Initially, it was challenging for her to shift from a directive style to one that emphasized open communication and value-based discussions. However, through consistent efforts and guided reflection in therapy, Maria began to see the positive impact of these changes on her relationship with Ethan. Maria reports that their interactions have become more respectful and cooperative. Ethan, who once would’ve balked at even simple requests, now listens more attentively when his mother explains the reasoning behind family rules. The emphasis on“why”over“what”has helped him better understand the logic and values behind certain expectations, such as curfew and chores. Although there are still moments of defiance (as expected with adolescence), these instances are now handled with more empathy and patience from both sides. Maria shared that a key moment for her was when Ethan came to her asking for advice on handling peer pressure in a difficult social situation. This was a significant turning point for their relationship—it was no longer about enforcing rules but about guiding Ethan to make decisions based on his own internal values, with Maria offering perspective rather than control.

Maria’s journey also highlighted an important realization about how to parent a young adult: the best thing parents can do is help their child identify their own values, not impose their own. Maria began to understand that Ethan, like all young adults, needed space to develop and define his personal values, especially as he approached adulthood. She recognized that the role of a parent shifts from enforcer to guide. Rather than dictating what Ethan should value, Maria now supports his process of self-discovery. One of the most significant breakthroughs in their relationship came when Maria, after a period of reflecting on her parenting, could articulate to Ethan when his behavior didn’t align with the values he had expressed to her. For example, when Ethan skipped school to hang out with friends, Maria was able to calmly address the situation by saying, “Ethan, you’ve told me how important education is to you, and your behavior right now doesn’t match those values. How can we get back on track?” This approach shifted the conversation from confrontation to collaboration, focusing on self-reflection rather than just punishment. Over time, Maria learned that parenting a teenager—and later a young adult—required a great deal of grace and courage. She realized that she didn’t have to be perfect, but that it was important to be consistent and genuine. It became clear that, like all people, her child would make mistakes, and when that happened, Maria needed the grace to acknowledge those mistakes with compassion, but also the courage to call them out in love. In one instance, after Ethan got into an argument with his father and said some hurtful things, Maria gently addressed the situation with him. She said, “You know, Ethan, I understand you were upset, but the way you spoke to your dad wasn’t in line with the values we’ve talked about—respect, kindness, understanding.” Rather than turning into a lecture, the conversation became a moment of reflection for Ethan, who was able to acknowledge that his actions didn’t match his core values. They both agreed that they would work together to find better ways of handling similar situations in the future. As time passed, Maria felt a deeper sense of connection with Ethan. No longer was their relationship defined by constant power struggles, but by mutual respect and understanding. Maria no longer felt the need to“fix”Ethan’s behavior, but instead supported him in his growth and development as an individual. They had both learned to be more patient, flexible, and honest with each other. Maria also acknowledged how much she had grown as a parent. The therapy process had helped her realize that parenting is not about control, but about creating an environment where values can be shared, explored, and respected. She now felt confident that she could guide Ethan without imposing her own beliefs onto him, understanding that as he matures, his values will evolve, and her role would continue to be one of loving guidance.

Maria’s experience underscores the importance of moving beyond “quick fixes” to building a strong foundation based on values in parenting. By teaching her son why rules matter and by shifting her focus from discipline for the sake of control to teaching him how to live in accordance with his own values, she fostered a healthier, more respectful relationship with Ethan. Their relationship grew stronger as they navigated the complex transition from childhood to adolescence, and Maria learned that the most important aspect of parenting a young adult is having the grace to notice mistakes, the courage to address them with love, and the wisdom to support their independence as they carve out their own identity. This process also taught Maria the value of modeling behavior consistently, and the importance of showing Ethan, through her own actions, the integrity of the values they discussed. She learned that parenting isn’t about being perfect—it’s about being authentic, consistent, and compassionate. In the end, Maria’s journey wasn’t just about changing how she approached parenting; it was about transforming the parent-child relationship into one of mutual respect and support, allowing Ethan to grow into a responsible young adult with a solid understanding of his own values.

Key Clinical Takeaways.

  • Cultural context matters in parenting approaches: Parenting styles, including authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive approaches, are shaped by cultural values and environmental factors. What may be considered“strict”in Western contexts can serve as a protective mechanism in high-risk environments among ethnic minority and lower-SES families. Clinicians should assess parenting strategies within cultural contexts rather than imposing Western norms.

  • Balancing discipline and emotional support is key: Effective parenting integrates both discipline (clear boundaries and expectations) and warmth (emotional support and attachment). Harsh or inconsistent discipline can lead to behavioral issues, while warmth fosters trust and resilience. Clinicians can support parents in achieving this balance by promoting self-regulation and structured yet nurturing interactions.

  • Parenting strategies must adapt across developmental stages: Parents should shift their approaches as children grow, from directive guidance in early childhood to autonomy-supportive strategies in adolescence. Encouraging value-driven decision-making, rather than strict rule enforcement, fosters self-efficacy and long-term positive outcomes. Clinicians can help parents develop psychological flexibility to navigate these transitions effectively.

  • The power of modeling: Parents serve as significant role models for their children. Demonstrating desired behaviors, emotional regulation skills, and adherence to values is crucial for children’s development. Clinicians should encourage parents to be mindful of their own actions and how these influence their children.

  • Guiding through values: Helping parents identify, clarify, and intentionally apply their core values in their parenting can foster greater consistency and purpose. This values-based approach supports children in internalizing principles and developing intrinsic motivation for positive behavior.

  • Addressing parental impairment: Factors such as parental depression, substance misuse, and significant stress can negatively impact parenting capacity. Clinicians should be attuned to these potential impairments and facilitate access to appropriate support and resources for parents.

  • Emotional connection in behavior correction: Prioritizing emotional connection creates a foundation of trust and safety that makes children more receptive to guidance and behavior correction. Approaching challenging behaviors with empathy and understanding, while still setting boundaries, is more effective in the long run than solely focusing on control.

Funding

Dr. Pagán’s research is funded by the University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Seed grant, an Autism Speaks Postdoctoral Fellowship Grant (#13904), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health, through UTHealth-CCTS grant number [5TL1TR003169-05 and T32TR004904]. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences or the National Institutes of Health.

Biography

Antonio F. Pagán is a licensed psychologist and postdoctoral fellow in the Louis A. Faillace Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Dr. Pagán conducts research on autism spectrum disorder across the lifespan with a focus on key inflection points and cultural considerations.

Footnotes

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate Ethical approval was not needed.

References

  1. Arnett JJ (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (1. issued as paperback). Oxford Univ. Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Azar ST, Reitz EB, & Goslin MC (2008). Mothering: Thinking is part of the job description: Application of cognitive views to understanding maladaptive parenting and doing intervention and prevention work. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 295–304. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baumrind D, Larzelere RE, & Owens EB (2010). Effects of Preschool Parents’ Power Assertive Patterns and Practices on Adolescent Development. Parenting, 10(3), 157–201. 10.1080/15295190903290790 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bornstein MH (Ed.). (2019). Handbook of parenting: Volume 2: Biology and ecology of parenting (Third edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9780429401459 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Byrne G, Ghráda ÁN, O’Mahony T, & Brennan E (2021). A systematic review of the use of acceptance and commitment therapy in supporting parents. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 94(S2), 378–407. 10.1111/papt.12282 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crandall A, Deater-Deckard K, & Riley AW (2015). Maternal emotion and cognitive control capacities and parenting: A conceptual framework. Developmental Review: DR, 36, 105–126. 10.1016/j.dr.2015.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deater-Deckard K, & Bell MA (2017). Maternal executive function, heart rate, and EEG alpha reactivity interact in the prediction of harsh parenting. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 31(1), 41–50. 10.1037/fam0000286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deater-Deckard K, Wang Z, Chen N, & Bell MA (2012). Maternal executive function, harsh parenting, and child conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 53(10), 1084–1091. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02582.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deci EL, & Ryan RM (2012). Self-Determination Theory. In Van Lange P, Kruglanski A, & Higgins E, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1 (pp. 416–437). SAGE Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9781446249215.n21 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Florean IS, Dobrean A, Păsărelu CR, Georgescu RD, & Milea I (2020). The Efficacy of Internet-Based Parenting Programs for Children and Adolescents with Behavior Problems: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23(4), 510–528. 10.1007/s10567-020-00326-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gershoff ET, Lee SJ, & Durrant JE (2017). Promising intervention strategies to reduce parents’ use of physical punishment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 71, 9–23. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayes SC (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35(4), 639–665. 10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80013-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kakihara F, & Tilton-Weaver L (2009). Adolescents’ Interpretations of Parental Control: Differentiated by Domain and Types of Control. Child Development, 80(6), 1722–1738. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01364.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kerr M, Stattin H, & Burk WJ (2010). A Reinterpretation of Parental Monitoring in Longitudinal Perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 39–64. 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00623.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuppens S, & Ceulemans E (2019). Parenting Styles: A Closer Look at a Well-Known Concept. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(1), 168–181. 10.1007/s10826-018-1242-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lunkenheimer E, Sturge-Apple ML, & Kelm MR (2023). The importance of parent self-regulation and parent–child coregulation in research on parental discipline. Child Development Perspectives, 17(1), 25–31. 10.1111/cdep.12470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Martínez I, Murgui S, Garcia OF, & Garcia F (2019). Parenting in the digital era: Protective and risk parenting styles for traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 84–92. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. McGoron L, & Ondersma SJ (2015). Reviewing the need for technological and other expansions of evidence-based parent training for young children. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 71–83. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.10.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Metwally S (2018). The Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Adolescents’ Personality Traits. Mansoura Nursing Journal, 5(2), 37–51. 10.21608/mnj.2018.149700 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller WR, & Rollnick S (2023). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change and grow (Fourth edition). The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Moilanen KL, Rasmussen KE, & Padilla-Walker LM (2015). Bidirectional Associations Between Self-Regulation and Parenting Styles in Early Adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(2), 246–262. 10.1111/jora.12125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Prinz RJ, Sanders MR, Shapiro CJ, Whitaker DJ, & Lutzker JR (2016). Addendum to “Population-Based Prevention of Child Maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P System Population Trial.” Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 17(3), 410–416. 10.1007/s11121-016-0631-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rostami M, & Saadati N (2018). Role of maternal parenting styles in predicting oppositional defiant, behavior, conduct, mood, and separation anxiety disorders among students. Journal of Research and Health, 8(5), 418–424. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ryan RM, & Deci EL (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Smetana JG (2017). Current research on parenting styles, dimensions, and beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 19–25. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Spencer CM, Topham GL, & King EL (2020). Do online parenting programs create change?: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(3), 364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun J, Xu X, Lee K, Chow SS, Wang Y, & Zhang L (2025). Parenting Styles and Children’s Hot and Cool Self-Regulation: The Moderating Role of Parenting Stress. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(1), 195–207. 10.1007/s10643-023-01579-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Theresya J, Latifah M, & Hernawati N (2018). The Effect of Parenting Style, Self-Efficacy, and Self Regulated Learning on Adolescents’ Academic Achievement. Journal of Child Development Studies, 3(1), 28. 10.29244/jcds.3.1.28-43 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tilton-Weaver L, Kerr M, Pakalniskeine V, Tokic A, Salihovic S, & Stattin H (2010). Open up or close down: How do parental reactions affect youth information management?☆. Journal of Adolescence, 33(2), 333–346. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tung I, & Lee SS (2014). Negative parenting behavior and childhood oppositional defiant disorder: Differential moderation by positive and negative peer regard. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 79–90. 10.1002/ab.21497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Heel M, Bijttebier P, Colpin H, Goossens L, Van Den Noortgate W, Verschueren K, & Van Leeuwen K (2019). Investigating the interplay between adolescent personality, parental control, and externalizing problem behavior across adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 176–186. 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.06.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES