Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 10;13:1597996. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1597996

Table 2.

The final list of survey items (n = 17) from the Delphi-method item rating exercise, labeled with their corresponding CFIR or inductive codes.

Survey items Response options

  1. Conducting a needs assessment or contextual evaluation of our intervention setting before implementation (CID)

 Not at all influential (1); A little influential (2); Moderately influential (3); Highly influential (4); Extremely influential (5)

  1. Identifying implementation barriers before implementation (CID)

  1. Leveraging the existing workforce at intervention site(s) to deliver the intervention (ICC)

  1. The availability of physical infrastructure (SC)

  1. Presence of supportive community culture (C)

  1. Intervention’s implementation process fits into participants’ daily routine (ICC)

  1. Providing inclusive learning strategies (e.g., training, certification programs, workshops, consultations) to implementers (ICLC)

  1. Easy channels for providing feedback on the intervention (ICGF)

  1. Leaders’ and key stakeholders’ engagement and support for intervention (RILE)

  1. Providing equipment for implementing the intervention (RIAR)

  1. Collaborating with community organizations for the intervention (Co)

  1. Providing training to implementers (RIAR)

  1. The interaction between the implementers and the beneficiaries of the intervention (NC)

 Poor (1); Fair (2); Good (3); Very Good (4); Excellent (5)

  1. The convenience of the intervention’s implementation process to implementers’ routine workflow (ICC)

  1. The implementers’ access to information and knowledge to optimally implement the intervention (RIAKI)

  1. In your opinion, how involved should leaders and key stakeholders be with implementing an intervention in a low- and middle-income country setting? (RILE)

 Not at all involved (1); A little involved (2); Moderately involved (3); Highly involved (4); Extremely involved (5)

  1. In your opinion, how supportive are existing government policies towards implementing your intervention in this setting? (EPI)

 Not at all supportive (1); A little supportive (2); Moderately supportive (3); Highly supportive (4); Extremely supportive (5)

CFIR and inductive codes.

Context for Intervention Design (CID); Implementation Climate (Compatibility) (ICC); Structural Characteristics (SC); Culture (C); Implementation Climate (Learning Climate) (ICLC); Implementation Climate (Goals and Feedback) (ICGF); Readiness for Implementation (Leadership Engagement) (RILE); Readiness for Implementation (Available Resources) (RIAR); Cosmopolitanism (Co); Network and Communications (NC); Readiness for Implementation (Access to Knowledge and Information) (RIAKI); External Policies and Incentives (EPI).