Table 4.
Response distribution on extent of contextual influence on feasibility of implementing CVD interventions in LMICs.
| Survey item | Low to moderate contextual influence, N (%) | High contextual influence, N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Conducting a needs assessment or contextual evaluation of our intervention setting prior to implementation | 73 (33.8) | 142 (65.7) |
| Identifying implementation barriers before implementation (pre-implementation) | 58 (26.9) | 158 (73.2) |
| Leveraging the existing workforce at intervention site(s) to deliver the intervention | 73 (33.8) | 143 (66.2) |
| The availability of physical infrastructure | 77 (35.7) | 139 (64.4) |
| Presence of supportive community culture | 71 (32.9) | 145 (67.1) |
| Intervention’s implementation process fits into participants’ daily routine | 78 (36.1) | 137 (63.4) |
| Providing inclusive learning strategies (e.g., training, certification programs, workshops, consultations) to implementers | 62 (28.7) | 154 (71.3) |
| Easy channels for providing feedback on the intervention | 76 (35.2) | 140 (64.8) |
| Leaders’ and key stakeholders’ engagement and support for intervention | 59 (27.3) | 157 (72.7) |
| Providing equipment for implementing the intervention | 59 (27.3) | 156 (72.2) |
| Collaborating with community organizations for the intervention | 70 (32.4) | 146 (67.6) |
| Providing training to implementers | 40 (18.5) | 176 (81.5) |