Table 8.
Comparison of the proposed method with other methods.
| Models’ names | Params (M) | FLOPs (M) | FPS | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MobileNet-V3 | 53 | 217 | 133 | 94.63% |
| ShuffleNetv2 | 7.9 | 531 | 55.6 | 93.02% |
| EfficientNetV2 | 119.36 | 340 | 40 | 94.50% |
| ViTKAB | 48.6 | 8533 | 44 | 98.05% |
Comparison of the proposed method with other methods.
| Models’ names | Params (M) | FLOPs (M) | FPS | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MobileNet-V3 | 53 | 217 | 133 | 94.63% |
| ShuffleNetv2 | 7.9 | 531 | 55.6 | 93.02% |
| EfficientNetV2 | 119.36 | 340 | 40 | 94.50% |
| ViTKAB | 48.6 | 8533 | 44 | 98.05% |