Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 11;13:1614017. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1614017

Table 4.

Ablation analysis on TITAN and TRANCOS datasets. Performance variations are reported for models with individual modules removed. The full model consistently outperforms all ablated variants in terms of Accuracy, Precision, F1 Score, and AUC.

Model TITAN Dataset TRANCOS Dataset
Accuracy Precision F1 Score AUC Accuracy Precision F1 Score AUC
w./o.Relational attention mechanism 86.37 ± 0.03 82.04 ± 0.02 83.65 ± 0.02 87.41 ± 0.03 86.18 ± 0.03 82.71 ± 0.02 84.26 ± 0.03 86.75 ± 0.02
w./o. Risk-oriented scene decoding 87.54 ± 0.02 84.10 ± 0.03 85.01 ± 0.02 88.16 ± 0.03 87.33 ± 0.03 83.66 ± 0.03 85.42 ± 0.02 88.07 ± 0.02
w./o. Directional local risk 85.76 ± 0.03 81.93 ± 0.03 82.78 ± 0.02 86.12 ± 0.02 84.79 ± 0.02 81.55 ± 0.02 82.31 ± 0.03 85.69 ± 0.03
Ours 89.42 ±0.02 86.15 ±0.03 87.63 ±0.02 90.33 ±0.02 88.91 ±0.03 85.92 ±0.02 87.18 ±0.02 89.87 ±0.03