Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 25;22(1):54–60. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-8-6

Table 2. Test-retest reliability analysis.

Location

First evaluationMedian (Q1; Q3)

Second evaluationMedian (Q1; Q3)

ICC (95% CI)

Axillary scar (n = 69)

3.0 (2.0; 5.0)

4.0 (2.0; 5.0)

0.839 (0.752–0.897)

Breast scar (n = 40)

5.5 (3.0; 6.0)

5.0 (4.0; 6.0)

0.929 (0.871–0.962)

Mastectomy scar (n = 41)

6.0 (4.0; 7.0)

6.0 (3.0; 6.0)

0.954 (0.915–0.975)

Mm pectorales region (n = 81)

0.0 (0.0; 1.0)

0.0 (0.0; 2.0)

0.883 (0.824–0.923)

Frontal chest wall (n = 81)

0.0 (0.0; 1.0)

0.0 (0.0; 1.0)

0.798 (0.702-0.865)

Lateral chest wall (n = 81)

0.0 (0.0; 1.0)

0.0 (0.0; 1.0)

0.847 (0.771–0.899)

Axilla (n = 81)

2.0 (0.0; 3.0)

2.0 (0.0; 3.0)

0.888 (0.831–0.926)

Inframammary fold (n = 81)

1.0 (0.0; 3.0)

0.0 (0.0; 2.0)

0.890 (0.833–0.928)

The intraclass correlation coefficient was used in the analysis. CI: Confidence interval; ICC: Intraclass correlation coefficient; n: Number of patients, p<0.05 for all