Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 25;22(1):54–60. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-8-6

Table 3. Interrater reliability analysis.

Location

Rater 1Median (Q1; Q3)

Rater 2Median (Q1; Q3)

ICC (95% CI)

Axillary scar (n = 28)

4.0 (2.0; 5.25)

4.0 (3.0; 5.25)

0.829 (0.664–0.917)

Breast scar (n = 16)

6.0 (3.75; 6.0)

5.5 (3.75; 6.0)

0.907 (0.755–0.966)

Mastectomy scar (n = 15)

6.0 (3.5; 6.0)

6.0 (3.0; 6.5)

0.948 (0.854–0.982)

Mm pectorales region (n = 32)

0.0 (0.0; 0.25)

0.0 (0.0; 1.0)

0.870 (0.750–0.934)

Frontal chest wall (n = 31)

0.0 (0.0; 0.0)

0.0 (0.0; 0.0)

0.405 (0.065–0.661)

Lateral chest wall (n = 31)

0.0 (0.0; 2.0)

0.0 (0.0; 1.0)

0.621 (0.346–0.797)

Axilla (n = 31)

2.0 (0.5; 3.0)

2.0 (0.0; 3.0)

0.919 (0.838–0.960)

Inframammary fold (n = 32)

0.0 (0.0; 2.0)

0.5 (0.0; 2.0)

0.702 (0.471–0.842)

The intraclass correlation coefficient was used in the analysis. CI: Confidence interval; ICC: Intraclass correlation coefficient; n: Number of patients, p<0.05 for all