Highlights
-
•
A comprehensive survey of high definition map for the intelligent connected vehicle.
-
•
A forward look from the history, standardization, building, and maintenance to its application.
-
•
Comparison between standards, models, algorithms, and open-source datasets.
-
•
A list of the overall challenges for the development of high definition map
Keywords: High definition (HD) map, Highly automated driving (HAD) map, Digital map, Intelligent connected vehicle (ICVs), Autonomous driving
Abstract
An accurate and up-to-date High Definition (HD) Map is critical for an intelligent vehicle to drive safely and effectively. Although research in this area is growing, there is still a lack of clarity in defining HD maps for intelligent connected vehicles (ICVs). This gap in knowledge is particularly challenging for new researchers, who often struggle to find suitable HD map datasets due to a lack of comprehensive reviews on current HD map products, as far as the authors’ knowledge. Thus, this article aims to bridge this gap by providing a thorough analysis of the core ideas of HD map technology. Initially, this paper presents the brief history of HD map. Following this, it describes the taxonomy and ontology of HD maps, complete with the HD map contents and existing standards. An insight into the mapping process is also given by discussing the algorithms used for creating and updating HD maps. This manuscript also lists current HD map products and the open-sourced dataset available for interested researchers in this space. As part of this study, the authors also describe common applications of HAD maps in ICVs. Finally, the article highlight the key research challenges and potential future directions in this field. Addressing these challenges is vital for the advancement and integration of HD maps for ICVs.
1. Introduction
As economies and societies evolve, maps have become an indispensable part of people’s daily lives. People can effortlessly travel by following the navigation information to any destination planned by their map app on their smartphones. For ICVs, the map plays an even more critical role in localization, navigation, and many other core functions [1]. Furthermore, different levels of autonomy require a different level of the map, as outlined in Table. 1. According to the definition of autonomy levels by SAE [2], for Level 1(L1)-Level 2(L2), where drivers still retains primary control of the vehicles while can function effectively with an Advanced Driver-Assistance System (ADAS) map offering sub-meter accuracy. These navigational maps are enough to assist drivers in performing the driving task correctly. However, as vehicles advance towards higher levels of automation, the need for more precise and accurate maps becomes imperative. For Level 4(L4) and Level 5(L5) autonomy, where the vehicle assumes most or all driving functions, a highly automated driving (HAD) map is paramount. These maps will provide detailed and critical information about the driving environment, enabling automated driving systems to react better than human drivers.
Table 1.
Automated driving level classification of SAE[2].
| Level | Title | Description | Map | Precision | Necessity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driver scenario | |||||
| 1 (DA) | Driving assistance | The vehicle features a single automated system (e.g., it monitors speed through cruise control | ADAS map | Sub-meter level | Optional |
| 2 (PA) | Partial driving automation | The vehicle can perform steering and acceleration, the human still monitors all tasks and can take control at any time | ADAS map | Sub-meter level | Optional |
| Automated driving system (’system’) scenario | |||||
| 3 (CA) | Conditional driving automation | The vehicle can perform most driving tasks, but human override is still required | ADAS map + HD map | Sub-meter level, Centimeter level | Optional |
| 4 (HA) | High driving automation | The vehicle performs all driving tasks under specific circumstances, geofencing is required, a human override is still an option | ADAS map + HD map | Sub-meter level, Centimeter level | Compulsory |
| 5 (FA) | Full driving automation | The vehicle performs all driving tasks under all conditions, zero human attention or interaction is required | HD map | Centimeter level | Compulsory (Required real-time updating) |
HAD map contains plenty of road information, such as lanes, traffic lights, crosswalks, and more, offering essential prior knowledge for various core functions in automated driving. These include perception, positioning, decision-making, and control [1]. The primary application of the HAD map is facilitating high-precision vehicle localization.
Accurate localization and positioning are essential prerequisites for the safety and reliability of autonomous driving, enabling vehicles to make correct decisions and control themselves according to their perceived surroundings. The most commonly used method is the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). However, GNSS often falls short in precision, which is critical to autonomous driving [3]. The localization performance further deteriorates when the vehicles go through areas with frequent signal loss, such as tunnels, or where elevation varies, like overpasses. Traditional high-precision localization methods, like Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) or light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors, are costly and not feasible for mass production due to budget constraints. Recent advancements in HAD mapping technology have enabled decimeter-level vehicle localization using low-cost sensors, such as cameras. It can be enhanced with the contextual information provided by HAD map [4].
The fundamental approach is to match the geometric features present in both the camera images and the map, which aids in inferring the vehicle position and orientation relative to the map. The key features for this process typically involve lane markings, traffic signs [5], or other semantic-level features [6]. To optimize memory usage, a compressed semantic HAD map could support high-precision localization while being resource-efficient [7]. The extensive information on lanes, traffic lights, crosswalks, and more stored in the HAD map acts as an additional sensor for environment perception. For example, it simplifies traffic light recognition by providing the light’s location, type, and the road’s slope, allowing for easy extraction of the region of interest (ROI) [8], and selection of an appropriate classifier [9]. 3D object detection also benefited from a HAD map through a bird’s eye-view to enhance the understanding of surroundings [10]. Besides, the sensing range of the vehicle could be extended beyond the line of sight and field of view by fusing the vehicles’ environmental information in the map, which could greatly improve perception capability [11]. HAD map is particularly useful in scenarios like dynamic visual occlusion, which may otherwise cause even cooperative perception to fail.
As they become more standardized, HAD maps can serve as a shared, real-time updated data structure among autonomous vehicles, effectively creating a crowdsourced solution. This comprehensive map data provides a reliable baseline for other onboard sensors. For example, a study [12] shows a multi-radar online self-calibration method using the precise locations of street lamps and traffic signs from the HAD map.
HAD maps are also instrumental in motion planning and decision-making. Initially, path planning utilized digital maps in platforms like Google and Baidu maps. However, HAD maps, with detailed information on road conditions, static objects, and traffic rules, offer more constraints for local motion planning and decision-making. They allow direct extraction of intersection geometries and real-time traffic situations for motion planning and control [13]. This was exemplified in the 2018 Intelligent Vehicles Future Challenge, where the ’Pioneer’ team from Xi’an Jiangtong University, leveraging HD maps, won the championship [14]. The team used the OpenStreetMap structure to build the map and generated a path set based on vehicle location, target points, lane states, and traffic rules from the HAD map. Overall, HAD maps play a vital role in localization, perception, navigation, motion planning, decision-making, and, ultimately, the safety of autonomous driving.
Numerous mapping enterprises and autonomous driving companies have showcased significant research and development in achieving full driving automation with the basis of the HAD map. Baidu, through its Project Apollo has been leading the way among Asian companies in this direction. On their autonomous driving platform, the HAD map serves as a vital component, contributing to modules such as localization, perception, routing, motion planning, prediction, and vehicle control [1]. In September 2020, Baidu Apollo unveiled its Robotaxi, during a live broadcast at Beijing Shougang Industrial Park. This event marks the beginning of a new milestone in vehicle autonomy research. Similarly, Mobileye released an edited video depicting urban autonomous driving tests, which can be seen in Fig. 1. In one instance, a huge truck stopped in front of the vehicle and hindered it from perceiving frontal situations. Initially, the vehicle hesitated, unable to determine if the truck had stopped due to a red traffic light or other reasons. However, with the assistance of the HAD map, it was identified that the truck remained stationary even after the light turned green. Consequently. the vehicle successfully changed lanes to continue its path, without driver intervention. Other notable companies like TomTom, Waymo,and Momenta have also dedicated efforts to develop HAD map. They have demonstrated remarkable achievements by integrating HAD maps into autonomous driving tasks.
Fig. 1.
The figure is captured from Mobileye’s autonomous driving test navigating at Autobahn near Munich. T[15].
While many research works have focused on addressing specific facets of autonomous driving with the HAD map as a potential solution, there is a notable gap in the literature concerning the comprehensive definition, historical development, classification, modeling, mapping processes, updates, and application of the HAD map. Consequently, this paper aims to comprehensively define the high-definition map and explore its updates and applications for autonomous driving. Furthermore, it will touch upon the ongoing challenges regarding the development of this technology. The framework of this paper is illustrated in Fig. 2.
-
1.
A comprehensive survey of high definition map for the intelligent connected vehicle.
-
2.
A forward look from the history, standardization, building, and maintenance to its application.
-
3.
Comparison between standards, models, algorithms, and open-source datasets.
-
4.
A list of the overall challenges for developing a high-definition map.
Fig. 2.
The organizational structure of this survey HAD map.
The structure of the remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 delves into the history of HAD maps. Section 3 discusses the definition, contents, classification, and mapping standard. Section 5 briefly analyzes HAD map mapping, updates, products, and open-source map datasets. Section 6 explores the application of the HAD map, which consists of localization, cooperative perception, and intelligent decision-making. The prospective future development and challenges associated with the HAD map are written in Section 7. Section 7 draws conclusions based on current research.
2. Digital map history
Initially, digital maps were used similarly to paper maps but were more portable [16]. Early digital maps offered a “virtual image” of roadways typically delineated by the landscape enclosing the surrounding area, which was essentially the same functionality as paper maps. Unlike most paper maps, digital maps are machine-readable. Digital maps allow quickly synchronizing changes from map data servers, representing the changing reality in real-time. The late 1900s enlarged the role of the digital map as digital maps increased along with the growth of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). The old “virtual views” no longer make up the entire Navigation Digital Map. The Mazda Eunos Cosmo was the first automobile with an integrated Global Positioning System (GPS) and digital maps in 1990 [17]. Then, navigation digital maps were widely employed on automobiles to establish the vehicle’s location, carry out map matching, compute routes, and provide drivers with directions. Their updating capability allows the inclusion of new roads and locations, enhancing their utility.
With time, digital map navigation has been refined to include live traffic updates, points of interest, and service locations, making them more ’user-friendly’. Modern computerized navigation maps boast an accuracy range of 5 to 20 meters in urban settings. The 2000s saw the advent of the Advanced Driving Assistance System (ADAS), incorporating basic warning and cruising features alongside the development of vehicle intelligence. This period also marked the introduction of ADAS maps, designed to support ADAS and autonomous driving [18], [19]. ADAS maps enhance digital maps with more accurate road geometry, like road curvature and road slope, and richer road attributes, such as lane width, number of lanes, and speed limits, along with traffic signs and traffic lights, are all added by ADAS maps to the existing digital maps. Thus, ADAS maps extend beyond navigation, providing dynamic traffic data to bolster ADAS functionality and covering SAE’s L1 and L2 levels of driving automation. The ADASIS Forum has established guidelines for ADAS Horizon and standardized map data interfaces like ADASISv1 and v2, with an accuracy of approximately 50 cm.
The concept of “high-definition map” idea was conceived in 2010 at a Mercedes-Benz research planning session. In 2013, a fully autonomous Mercedes Benz S-Class S 500 completed a 103 km journey on urban and country roads using high-resolution maps [20]. Designed to capture all relevant environmental variables for driving, which sensors alone might not accurately detect, HD maps introduced novel features for vehicle perception and localization.
These maps, offering 3D representations, integrate closely with localization functions and support the planning and control modules. Beyond mere navigation aids, they are pivotal for high-level automated driving (SAE L3 and above), hence the term High Automated Driving (HAD) Map. HAD Maps encompass a broader range of data, including dynamic information like real-time traffic and sensor data and detailed static road-level data. Their comprehensive static information surpasses that of standard maps. Functioning as virtual sensors, HAD Maps enhance vehicle safety without complicating the hardware system. Standards associated with HAD Maps include the Tsinghua Seven layers HD map model [21], OpenDRIVE, and Local Dynamic Map (LDM) [22]. LDM provides a framework for hierarchically storing dynamic and static elements, while the Tsinghua model offers an in-depth representation of the environment for highly automated driving. HAD Maps achieve an impressive accuracy of 10–20 cm.
Despite these maps evolving gradually, there are still certain discrepancies between digital maps, ADAS maps, and high-definition maps. The following table illustrates how high-definition, conventional, and ADAS maps differ from one another in terms of map users, functionalities, accuracy, frequency of updates, and content. The specifics are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2.
The features of digital map, ADAS map and HAD map.
| Feature | Navigation Digital Map | ADAS map | HAD Map |
|---|---|---|---|
| User | Drivers | Intelligent vehicle, ADAS system | Intelligent vehicle, autonomous driving system |
| Function | Navigation and search | ACC, LDW, LKA, and FCW. | Environmental perception, high-precision positioning, and path planning decision. |
| Object Types | static objects | and dynamic objects | Static and dynamic objects |
| Route Planning | Global path planning | Local path planning/global path planning | Local path planning |
| Resolution | 5-20 meters | Meters and sub-meters | 0.1-0.2 meters |
| Updating Frequency | Permanent static data (update frequency: about 3 months), semi-permanent static data (update frequency: about 1 hour) | Permanent static data (frequency approximately 1 month), semi-permanent static data (frequency approximately 1 hour), semi-dynamic data (frequency approximately 1 minute), dynamic data (frequency approximately 1 second) | |
| Semantic Information | Road names | Road names and map element information | |
| Road Names | Important | Less Important | Less Important |
| Location | GPS | High dimensional data matching | |
| Content | Road-level data, such as road shape, slope, direction | High-precision road-level data: road shape, slope, curvature, paving, and direction. | Detailed and high-precision road-level data, including lane models, components, attributes, and targets. Multiple information layers: sensing layer, positioning layer, and dynamic layer. |
ACC: Adaptive Cruise Control, LDW: Lane Departure Warning, LKA: Lane Keep Assistance, FCW: Forward Collision Warning
3. What is a high-definition map ?
In this section, we aim to clarify the definition and the components of a high-definition map. Additionally, we present different classifications of map representation, enhancing the readers’ comprehension of map data. Here, we also provide all of the standards that have been commonly referenced in the literature. Finally, we summarize all of this information in the last subsection.
3.1. The definition of HD map
HAD maps offers precise and reliable information about the driving environment for vehicles. In addition to serving as a navigational tool, HAD Map can function as an effective “sensor”. After a vehicle has been localized on the map [19], it offers precise information about both the immediate and extended surrounding area. Furthermore, it is a component of the digital infrastructure that supports not just automated driving also several other applications, including smart cities, safety, and urban planning and management [23].
As the role of machines in driving expands, digital maps evolve beyond mere navigation tools. Traditional GPS solutions fail to provide the accurate and dynamic data required for autonomous vehicles. Autonomous driving software requires self-updating mapping systems specifically designed for these vehicles, enhancing their perception of the environment. Utilizing HAD mapping technology, an autonomous vehicle can localize itself with high precision, accurately mapping its position relative to its surroundings. HAD maps assimilate and analyze data from multiple sources in real-time, including vehicle sensors, LiDAR, onboard cameras, satellite imaging, and GPS. This integration differs significantly from conventional maps designed for general navigation. The amalgamation of this data provides a comprehensive, up-to-date understanding of road gradients, boundaries, traffic signals, lane positions, anticipated curves, and safety conditions. As such, high-definition maps redefine the standards for in-car navigation systems in autonomous vehicles [24], [25], offering an exceptionally accurate depiction of the route.”
Definition 1
High-Definition Map (HD map) is an accurate and detailed expression of the road traffic scene. Compared with the traditional navigation electronic map, the content of the expression is more abundant. HD map belonging to the lane level has higher accuracy, reaching the centimeter-level accuracy requirements. The map data must be updated at a high frequency to ensure the authenticity of the map data to provide map matching to assist the environmental perception and path planning tasks.
Definition 2
The Highly Automated Driving Map (HAD map) constitutes a real-time, dynamic, multi-layered data characterized by centimeter-level precision. As a cornerstone in the realm of automated driving, the HAD map underpins critical functionalities such as positioning, planning, decision-making, and control, thereby ensuring safety and reliability. It encompasses a detailed representation of both static road features and dynamic traffic elements, including roads, lane lines, curbs, and traffic signs. Beyond capturing these map elements’ geometric and topological relationships, the HAD map also integrates multidimensional information, such as confidence levels. Moreover, the representation of HAD maps extends beyond point cloud and vector maps, encompassing semantic maps, grid maps, and various other formats.
Definition 3
Automated driving high-precision map is type of data characterized by accurate positional information and an extensive array of road elements information. This map integrates 2D and 3D representations, vector and raster formats, as well as point cloud and semantic map [26]. It provides essential prior knowledge for intelligent driving and understanding of real roads, similar to the human brain’s perception of actual road conditions. Additionally, this map also predicts complex road scenarios for the intelligent vehicle and mitigating potential driving risks, which is the core foundation for realizing automated driving. As a crucial component in developing autonomous driving technology, the automated driving map plays a pivotal role in high-precision positioning, intelligent navigation, control, and other aspects directly influencing to the safety, stability, and comfort of autonomous driving. Furthermore, it is one of the core key technologies of autonomous driving.
3.2. The contents of HAD map
To provide enough information to assist autonomous driving, the HAD map contains many types of elements. Generally, the elements of an HAD map can be divided into two categories: static elements and dynamic elements.
3.2.1. Static elements
The static elements in the HAD map can be divided into basic road features and supplementary static elements, as the basic features of the structural road environment, road, junction, and lane are essential in global path planning and local driving decisions. The local environment also has supplementary static elements, such as traffic signs, bridges, railway crossings, platforms, and road lamps [24]. These elements can be divided into three categories according to their relationship with the road network: on-road elements, accessories, and off-road elements. On-road elements include tunnels, bridges, and railway crossings, which are part of the road network and can be described as properties of roads or junctions. Road accessories are the functional elements related to traffic rules. Traffic lights, signs, and road marks can represent traffic rules in the lane property. Crosswalk is also an accessory highly related to the driving process [21]. According to geographic data files (GDF) standards [27], some road accessories are still not included, namely environment facilities, road lamps, guideposts, road cameras, and guard rails. The last type of supplementary elements, off-road elements, includes parking lots, and bus platforms. These functional elements can give some indications to the driving process.
3.2.2. Dynamic elements
The dynamic elements in the HAD map can be divided into two categories: the dynamic physical entities and the dynamic information, such as traffic light status, weather conditions, and temporary speed limit. The dynamic elements are constructed in the HAD map through vehicle-to-everything (V2X) [21], [28].
Dynamic physical entities include ego vehicles, obstacles, and free areas. The status of the ego vehicle is crucial for making driving decisions. Dynamic obstacles primarily include vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. It is important to note that stationary dynamic obstacles are also classified as dynamic obstacles, as treating them as static could pose risks if they unexpectedly move. Since vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists are the most common traffic participants and have quite different dynamic characteristics and behaviour modes, they are represented separately with specific properties. Due to the highly dynamic properties of these physical entities, they should be updated at a high frequency through V2X [24].
Dynamic information, on the other hand, encompasses traffic light data, traffic conditions, weather, and temporary traffic regulations. Traffic light details and status, including flow and density, are typical elements in commercial electronic maps. Weather information plays a significant role in perception, decision-making, and vehicle control. Accurately quantifying weather effects can aid in adjusting control algorithms for enhanced safety. Temporary traffic rules, such as speed limits, restricted vehicle access (like bus lanes during certain hours), and accident reports are also dynamic elements. These rules often vary based on road weather conditions and can be viewed as time-dependent properties, similar to the regulations indicated by traffic signs [21].
3.3. Classification of different HAD maps
Derived from a variety of map elements, high-definition maps can be represented in different forms, such as:
3.3.1. Raster map (Occupancy grid Map)
Raster map is also known as the occupancy grid map (OGM). It was first proposed by Moravec and Elfes [28], [30], [31]. The surrounding environment is modelled by dividing the space into uniform cell grids (either 2D or 3D), which store corresponding information as shown in Fig. 3 [32]. Han et al. [33] proposed a 2.5D version that adds the height data on the grid cell rather than converting it into a 3D grid map.
Fig. 3.
Example of local OGMs generated from the fusion between camera and LiDAR data between intelligent connected vehicle: (a) ego vehicle (b) vehicle 1. The figures are obtained from Zheng et al. [29] work.
The type of information stored can either be occupancy probability [34], [35], reflection intensity [36], probability distribution [37], or distance information [30]. The size of the cell grids determined the resolution and required storage space of the map. This type of map can be used to determine the movements of pedestrians [38], vehicle position [39], and vehicle navigation [40].
3.3.2. Point cloud map
The rapid development of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology lowered the barriers to point cloud maps. Therefore, many HD map providers have employed point cloud maps, such as HERE, TomTom, and Waymo. [31]. Point cloud maps offer discrete and dense samplings of the environment, capturing accurate 3D coordinates of points for a high-quality representation of the world which can be seen in Fig. 4 [41]. In Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), the map includes only landmarks or even a sparse 3D point cloud, called a 3D sparse map[16]. The advantage of point cloud maps is that they densely model the entire environment and preserve rich environmental information [42]. Their disadvantage is that the storage space required will grow exponentially as the mapped area expands, which inconveniences maps’ storage, transmission, and application [31]. There have been a lot of use cases for localization [43] and navigation [44] since the data provided by LiDAR is considered state-of-the-art in terms of ranging precision and accuracy.
Fig. 4.
The point cloud map of an intelligent vehicle passing through a complex intersection. The figure is obtained from Seif and Hu [1] works.
3.3.3. Geometric feature map
Geometric feature maps represent the elements in an abstract, vectorized form. The elements are stored as points, lines, surfaces, and other basic geometric entities as illustrated in Fig. 5. Thus the map provides the information needed for positioning while saving storage space [30]. The advantage of this method is that the geometric features are sparse and can store information efficiently. However, it requires heavy labor to extract features offline in the map-building process [31].
Fig. 5.
Example of geometric features map on the road. The red lines portray the road features, and the blue circles portray the point features on the map. This figure is obtained from Xiao et al. [6] works.
3.3.4. Topological map
A topological map is a graph composed of nodes and edges [45], [46], primarily focusing on connectivity between various map elements [30]. Topological maps do not focus on the accuracy and structural details of the map, which is a more compact form of expression, which can be seen in Fig. 6. However, when dealing with complex structures, it is necessary to implement appropriate graph segmentation [26]. These maps are particularly useful in street-level navigation and path-planning tasks. Besides, it can be integrated with semantic information to enhance vehicle perception and localization robustness in complex and dynamic environments. Readers interested in the information regarding topological mapping through vision-based methods can refer to [47].
Fig. 6.
Illustration of topological map of an intersection where the lane nodes are connected to clearly define the permitted lanes for planning tasks. Red dots indicate exit, and blue dots indicate entry.
3.3.5. Intensity map
The intensity value is a metric indicating the pulse strength generated by a laser radar at a specific point. This value is determined by the reflectivity of the object scanned by the LiDAR pulse, which in turn is dependent on the wavelength used. Consequently, the intensity of the echo varies with the composition of the surface object that reflects the echo as shown in Fig. 7 [48], [49].
| (1) |
| (2) |
Fig. 7.
The example of intensity map obtained from LiDAR frames.
Among , represents the intensity value of the grid cell ; is the weight value of cell ; is the gray value of cell . The intensity map is a two-dimensional representation created through raster processing and projection calculation. This map is derived directly based on the intensity values obtained from raw LiDAR data. Bârsan et al. [50] proposes a real-time localization at 15 Hz by using a LiDAR intensity map and achieves centimeter-level accuracy.
3.3.6. Semantic map
The semantic map layer plays a crucial role in providing a higher level of understanding of the environment compared to traditional maps. The semantic map contains information about the meaning and function of objects and features in the environment, allowing autonomous vehicles to understand their surroundings better and make more informed decisions [56], [57]. The depiction of this map can be seen in Fig. 8. The construction of a semantic map follows some basic principles:
-
1.
All data must be consistent with the geometric layer information of the vehicle.
-
2.
The data obtained by the vehicle itself is the most reliable source of information.
-
3.
Make full use of existing data resources, such as navigation maps, and build semantic maps based on them.
Fig. 8.
Road semantics mapping based on crowdsourced data. The figure is taken from Wijaya et al. [51] work with permission from the authors.
A semantic map is not an independent map layer. It can be mapped into a geometric map, a vector map, a road network map, a point cloud map, and other maps.
3.3.7. Density map
Density maps, also known as dense maps, are also used in autonomous driving research. This map serves as an intermediate representation of targets in the areas as can be seen in Fig. 9. Several recent techniques [55], [58], [59] can obtain accurate counting performance. This map is useful for assessing an area’s traffic density, which is valuable in the path-planning algorithm for efficient and safe autonomous driving purposes.
Fig. 9.
Density map of ShanghaiTech_B[52], Expo[53], and UCF_50[54]dataset obtained from Wan et al. [55]works.
3.4. The current map standards
The complexity of the driving environment requires that the elements of the HAD map be organized in a standardized data structure for comprehensive understanding [26]. A standard format and model not only provide convenient access to necessary data for users but also ensure uniformity across different platforms. Numerous standard institutes and companies are developing their unique map standards. This section will introduce some of the most influential standards in the industry and examine their approaches to organizing environmental elements. Notable standards in the autonomous driving sector include OpenDRIVE, NDS, LDM, ADASIS, lanelet, and Tsinghua HAD map are the most influential HAD map standards in the autonomous driving industry [26], [60]. Among them, OpenDRIVE [61], [62], [63] and NDS [64] predominantly concentrate on the static map model, providing a thorough understanding of the static structural road environment. Conversely, LDM [65], [66] focuses on dynamic elements. Lanelet [67], [68] presents an efficient map representation for autonomous driving. ADASIS focuses on data transmission and its application in ADAS [69]. In this chapter, we will introduce the typical map standards and models.
3.4.1. OpenDRIVE
OpenDRIVE [61], [62], [63] is an open-source map format created by the enterprise alliance engaged in simulation development. It encompasses road networks and topologies while supporting the 3D geometric information representation for autonomous driving. OpenDRIVE map is organized as a hierarchical repository in XML format, which is more suitable for automated driving simulation. This format is often adopted for static information expression and centralized storage. It is realised according to a strict hierarchical inheritance relationship. With road links and junctions as basic units, with additional elements like lanes and traffic signs being methodically integrated into hierarchical layers. The most significant feature of the OpenDRIVE map is its distinct and clear structure as shown in Fig. 10.
-
1.
Coordinate system: Latitude and longitude are transformed to a ground plane with the north-east-sky ground coordinate system. The road geometry is calculated from the ground coordinate. The elements along the road, such as lanes and traffic signs, are represented in the coordinate. The axis is set along the road center line, while the axis is set vertically to the road center line. See Fig. 11.
-
2.Road network: A road in the OpenDRIVE network comprises several key components:
-
(a)Reference line: This is typically the road’s center line. The reference line can be a straight line, a clothoid, or a circular arc. Additional road attributes like elevation and traffic signs are specified along the reference line.
-
(b)Lanes and lane properties: Each road may contain one or more lanes. The basic format of a lane includes its basic properties (like connection relationship, lane type, length, and speed limit), which are stored as strings.
-
(c)3D geometry information: This section includes sectional lines with four basic geometry types: straight line, clothoid, circle arc, and polynomial. Essential parameters for each geometry type and start-end points are detailed.
-
(d)Elevation Profile and Section Shape: A cubic curve represents the elevation profile and illustrates the height-longitudinal distance (height-) relationship. Based on the longitudinal coordinate (), the section shape is depicted through the height-width (height-) relationship.
-
(e)Lane boundary information: This covers the colour, type (solid or broken), material, and width of lane boundaries.
-
(f)Additional Information: OpenDRIVE maps also support elements beyond the road network, such as stations, railways, and parking lots. This information and road and junction data form the complete XML file.
-
(a)
Fig. 10.
The structure inside an OpenDRIVE map consists of traffic simulation, vehicle dynamics, and sensor simulation.
Fig. 11.
The depiction of the coordinate system in OpenDRIVE where the latitude and longitude are transformed into a ground plane represented in s-t coordinate.
3.4.2. NDS format
In the NDS map [64], the whole earth’s surface is divided into tiles by quadtree. The higher the level in the quadtree, the smaller the tiles. Each tile is given an ID number, as shown in Fig. 12. Different types of information are stored in different building blocks. The information in each tile is stored in the building blocks. Considering the high complexity of the NDS format, here we will only introduce some basic information provided by the NDS format.
-
1.
Road Information: This information is stored in the 13th tile. The overall representation of earth’s surface is included in tiles 2-13. This category entails road links, junctions, and road geometry information. The road geometry information is similar to that in OpenDRIVE maps.
-
2.
Lane Representation: In the context of ADAS and autonomous driving applications, the lanes in NDS maps are defined by their basic properties, connection relationships, and geometric characteristics. Key attributes include lane type and speed limits. Lanes are grouped based on their direction and road association, forming the foundation of a lane-level network. The geometric design of lanes is articulated using splines, augmented with elevation profiles and section shapes akin to those in the OpenDRIVE format. The NDS map format also supports lane boundary types, such as lane markers, road edges, and railings.
-
3.
Other information: The NDS map has detailed, high-precision data and includes information typical of traditional maps. Leveraging a comprehensive tile system, the NDS map supports various types of information, including map display, traffic data, terrain features, object names, and more. This makes the NDS map more mature than OpenDRIVE and improves its complexity, making it less simple than an XML OpenDRIVE file.
Fig. 12.
The framework of the NDS format is divided into several building blocks of different types of information, such as lane, obstacles, routing, and localization landmarks.
3.4.3. ADASIS [69] and LDM [65], [66]
ADASIS is a map standard developed for ADAS applications, and it focuses on the data transmission between the cloud and the clients. The cloud provides ADAS Horizon (AH) for client subscriptions, containing information pertinent to autonomous driving map standards, including the road, junction, lanes, and reference lines. When users input the destination in real applications, the global path planner will simultaneously sort the map element information [69]. In addition, ADASIS supports the fusion of perception results in the map platform as shown in Fig. 13.
Fig. 13.
The structure of ADASIS format that connects the perception data to ADAS functionalities.
In contrast, LDM focuses on the dynamic elements in the driving environment. It is designed for the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) rather than only the static geographical environment. LDM contains four layers: highly dynamic, transient dynamic, transient static, and permanently static data, with dynamic information being updated by V2X. As shown in Fig. 14, LDM contains static information from OpenDRIVE and NDS, as well as dynamic elements. The traffic details, such as traffic lights and flow, is allocated to the third layer, while the highly dynamic elements, predominantly dynamic obstacles on the road, are slotted in the fourth layer.
Fig. 14.
LDM layers’ structures consist of highly dynamic, transient dynamic, transient static, and permanent static. The figure is obtained from [70] works.
3.4.4. Lanelet
In the field of automated driving, LaneLet [67], [68] serves as an effective expression of high-precision maps. It specify the area where automated driving is possible with LaneLets that are connected to one another. It is capable of fully expressing both the lane topology and the lane geometry. It can also incorporate people’s driving behaviours and traffic laws simultaneously. A physical, relational, and topological layer can be found in Lanelet2 [68]. Each Lanelet is bordered by left and right bounds, each composed of a sequence of points, enabling precise replication of various lane shapes. The output map of the lanelet2 software typically adopts the OSM format. This technology was notably employed during the MERCEDES BENZ S 500 INTELLIGENT DRIVE’s autonomous trip over the Bertha Benz Memorial Route in the summer of 2013 [20].
The map example for a highway road and the resulting map structure, as well as for an intersection and the resulting routing graph for normal vehicles, are shown in Fig. 15. The red in the graph indicates conflicting lanelets.
Fig. 15.
The structure of lanelet2 in highway, and planning route map of vehicles at intersections[68].
3.4.5. Tsinghua HAD map
Generally, the basic idea of the above map standards is to find a way to better sort the information in the road environment. In contrast, the Tsinghua HAD map standard focuses on the application in autonomous driving, providing information according to the requirements of perception, positioning, and decision-making [21]. Tsinghua HAD map contains seven layers, considering the road-level and lane-level network, high-precision static information, dynamic obstacles, and partial decision-making assistant information (See Fig. 16).
-
1.
Road layer: Road-level network is the basis of the traditional map and the foundation of global path planning of autonomous vehicles.
-
2.
Traffic information layer: The road-level macroscopic traffic information is provided in this layer to help global path planning. The traffic flow and temporary road closure information can be found in this layer.
-
3.
Road-lane connection layer: The lane-level network is further given for the lane-level global path planning of autonomous cars based on the road-level network. The road-lane connection layer provides the topological relationship between the road and lane-level networks.
-
4.
Lane layer: This layer contains high-precision, detailed static environment information. Like the OpenDRIVE map, the lane layer contains lane geometry, traffic signs, lane-level traffic rules, slope, and curvature.
-
5.
Map feature layer: The map feature layer is designed for highly-accurate self-positioning of autonomous vehicles. The map feature layer contains LiDAR point cloud and image line features. During the operation of autonomous vehicles, comparing features extracted by onboard sensors with those in the map plays a crucial role in refining the position measurement of ego vehicles can be modified. This is useful in a complex urban environment where the GNSS signal is interrupted and occluded. This layer contains a lot of sensor feature data and, thus, needs more storage than the above four layers. However, compared to the vector and string information in the four layers, the map feature layer can better support the self-positioning of autonomous vehicles.
-
6.
Dynamic object container layer: This layer is designed for obstacle perception and local dynamic trajectory planning. With the help of V2X, the roadside infrastructure, and the connected vehicles can upload the obstacle information to the cloud, achieving the real-time update of the dynamic objects container layer. Autonomous vehicles can get this information from the map to get a non-occlusion environment perception, thus better supporting local dynamic trajectory planning.
-
7.
Intelligent decision support layer: The layer can support driving decisions by providing some prior decision knowledge. In fact, the driving decisions are closely related to the local geographical features. The characteristics of driving decisions are analyzed according to every specific location. Then, these are stored in the intelligent decision support layer as prior knowledge. This data can be acquired by leveraging crowdsourced data from taxis, for example, inside a city. The vehicle can download the local driving knowledge for the most appropriate driving decision policy. This layer is a significant characteristic of the Tsinghua HAD map.
Fig. 16.
The structure of the Tsinghua HAD map for the autonomous driving application consists of seven layers. This figure is obtained from [21] works.
3.5. Summary
High-definition maps are diverse, each featuring multiple layers tailored to the information they store and their specific application scenarios. These maps can be classified into various types, including raster, point cloud, geometric feature, topological, intensity, semantic, and density maps. This section also encapsulates the standardization process of current HD maps across these classifications. As illustrated in Table 3, OpenDRIVE and NDS are geared towards static environments, whereas LDM and Tsinghua maps encompass both static and dynamic elements. OpenDRIVE is known for its simplicity, open-source nature, and ease of use, making it popular in research settings. In contrast, NDS aims for comprehensive coverage, providing detailed static information that includes both conventional map data (e.g., GDF map standard) and additional HD details essential for autonomous driving. The LDM standard, designed for ITS, addresses static and dynamic elements. It enables updating macroscopic traffic information and microscopic dynamic obstacles via V2X communication in ITS. The Tsinghua map model, distinct from LDM, prioritizes integration with technical modules in autonomous driving, offering advanced features for positioning and decision-making. Unlike these standards, ADASIS is more concerned with data transmission than an extensive driving environment description. It provides users with information along the globally planned path, making the “path” its sole layer or building block, with all relevant data treated as path properties. Collectively, these five standards each have their unique focal points, characteristics, and advantages.
Table 3.
The characteristics of different map standards.
| Standard | Layers | Contained elements | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenDRIVE | 5 | Road network, junction, lane, traffic sign, traffic rule, station | HD static road information, XML hierarchical format, open and free |
| NDS | 18 | Complete understanding of static elements | Abundant static HD information, quadtree storage, both HAD and traditional information |
| ADASIS | 1 | Road network, junction, lane, traffic sign, and traffic rule. | ADAS application, communication consideration |
| LDM | 4 | Permanent static, transient static, transient dynamic, highly dynamic | Both static and dynamic information, designed for ITS and V2X |
| Tsinghua | 7 | Road network, detailed static elements, static positioning features, dynamic elements, decision-making knowledge | Designed for autonomous driving application, decision-making support, additional features for positioning |
4. Map creation, products, and maintenance
This section will briefly discuss the mapping process, update, resulting products, and available open-source HAD map datasets.
4.1. HAD map creation
HAD maps are widely used to enhance autonomous vehicle technologies, and the accuracy and quality of HAD maps are directly related to the reliability, safety, and efficiency of autonomous driving. At present, the accuracy of the HAD map is centimeter-lever, and the update should be done frequently to ensure the precision and quality of the HAD map. HAD map mapping can be divided into four steps: data acquisition, HD map generation, quality control, and release and maintenance [71]. The details are as follows:
-
1.
Data acquisition: This task involves using multiple Mobile Mapping Systems (MMS) to gather high-precision, multi-source road data. These MMS can be seen in Fig. 17. Updating these maps promptly with each change is crucial to ensure autonomous vehicle safety. Currently, the prevalent method employs MMS equipped with cameras, LiDAR, GPS/IMU, and other sensors [72]. The raw data of MMS is collected from cameras, LiDAR, GPS, IMU, wheel speed sensors, and other onboard sensors for HD map generation afterward [73]. While this approach offers high accuracy, it is costly, and updates may only occur monthly at times. Although this method ensures high accuracy, it is expensive and may lead to monthly update cycles at best. To address the need for real-time updates, there is a growing trend towards crowdsourcing data from vehicles like smart cars, public buses, and taxis, all equipped with various sensors [74]. This approach significantly enriches the data sources and increases the frequency of updates. However, it presents challenges related to the variable quality of crowdsourced data, which can be affected by differences in sensor capabilities, timing of data collection, and the perspectives from which the data is acquired.
-
2.
HD Map Generation: This stage can utilize MMS or SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) technology [31], [75]. MMS estimates the vehicle’s pose directly through GPS and IMU [76], [77], [78], while SLAM combines data from odometers, GPS, IMU, and wheel speed sensors for a more confident pose estimation and reduces error accumulation through loop closure [79], [80], [81]. After acquiring poses, an HD map can be pieced together using map elements extracted from the point clouds and images collected. The three-dimensional geometric and topological information of map elements extracted based on LiDAR [82], [83] and image data [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], include lanes, traffic signs, traffic lights, and poles. Finally, the map elements are transformed into the coordinate system and saved in the corresponding map layers [72], [92].
-
3.
Quality Control: This phase involves applying predefined evaluation metrics and standards to verify the map’s accuracy. Some map elements, automatically extracted by algorithms, require manual verification [93].
-
4.
Release and Maintenance: After meeting accuracy requirements, the HD map is released. In this stage, map elements are compiled and issued according to set standards. HD maps undergo updates to reflect environmental changes and issues identified in use [71].
Fig. 17.
The specialized MMS vehicle from different giant mapping companies.
4.2. The HAD map products
In the sector of automotive driving, various research institutions and leading companies have proposed map products, including Apollo HD map, AMAP HD map, NavInfo HD map, HERE HD Live Map, Waymo HD map, and Mobileye HD map. These products of HD maps have been improved continuously, enriching their content and enhancing data accuracy to reach a level of precision within centimeters.
4.2.1. Commercialized HAD map
Given the value provided by HAD map towards autonomous driving, more and more companies are now working on commercializing the HAD map data (See Table 4). Various companies are working on this aspect, such as:
-
1.
Apollo HD map (Baidu) [94]: The production of Apollo HD maps includes four links: data collection, data processing, element identification, and manual verification. Data elements of the Apollo HD map include road elements, intersection elements, traffic signal elements, logical relationship elements, and other road object elements. The data format is mainly inherited from the OPENDRIVE format.
-
2.
AMAP HD map [104]: AMAP, formerly AutoNavi, has amassed high-precision autopilot map data over more than 320,000 kilometers. The two LiDARs and four cameras on AMAP’s specialized mapping vehicle for HAD-level autonomous driving maps primarily gather road data with an accuracy of up to 10 cm. To offer a complete “autonomous driving map + high-precision positioning solution,” AMAP collaborated with the provider of precise location services, Qianxun Location. The lateral and longitudinal errors are within 7 cm under normal road conditions and 6 cm and 5 cm under high-speed/urban loop conditions, according to the two parties’ present lane-level positioning solutions [95].
-
3.
NavInfo HD map [96]: NavInfo initiated its foray into the realm of autonomous driving maps with technical research and exploration starting in 2013. The company further solidified its commitment to this field in 2015 by establishing the Smart Map Division, marking the official commencement of product development and commercialization efforts for autonomous driving maps, specifically targeting Level 3 and higher autonomous driving systems. NavInfo has now achieved comprehensive proficiency in the entire product capability suite for autonomous driving maps. This suite encompasses a range of processes from data collection, automated mapping, and crowdsourcing updates to rapid iteration, demonstrating NavInfo’s significant progress and expertise in this domain.
-
4.
TomTom HD map [105]: TomTom N.V., a Dutch multinational company specializing in developing and producing consumer gadgets and location-based services. With precision down to a few centimeters, it provides TomTom HD map, a very accurate representation of the road with various features, including lane models, traffic signs, road furniture, and lane geometry. To guarantee that the automated driving system has access to the most recent road information, TomTom developed the TomTom AutoStream delivery service, which effectively distributes the most recent and pertinent HD map data.
-
5.
HERE HD Live Map [106]: HERE was formerly known as NAVTEQ, an American mapping company. HERE’s autonomous driving map is an extension of the traditional navigation map. The accuracy of the map must be at least sub-meter level, and the information will be more abundant. Basic road information, features, and dynamic information layers are composed of different layers, which can be customized according to the needs of the OEM. In May 2018, HERE, NavInfo (China), Increment P /Pioneer (Japan), and SK Telecom (South Korea) announced establishing the OneMap alliance to develop global map standards. Starting in 2020, we will provide uniform standard high-precision map products and services to the industry to support the implementation of global OEM autonomous driving solutions.
-
6.
Dynamic Map and Cooperation Area [99]: Dynamic Map and Cooperation Area is a high-precision three-dimensional location information platform that DMP (Dynamic Map Platform Co., Ltd.) offers. It contains both static information (High-Accuracy 3D Information) and dynamic information, such as road construction plans, accident information, and traffic light information. They can achieve centimeter-class precision for their geometric map data.
-
7.
Waymo HD map [107]: Waymo’s high-precision maps are developed from Google Maps and have a strong data and technical background. Currently, the high-precision maps it produces are only used for its own autonomous driving, not as a commercial product. The method of collecting maps is LiDAR, plus an integrated navigation and positioning system. They also have a large surveying and mapping fleet to create high-precision maps together by means of map fusion.
-
8.
Mobileye [108]: Although Mobileye does not directly produce high-precision maps, its camera technology significantly contributes to this domain. Each Mobileye camera is capable of capturing detailed road conditions ahead. For instance, these cameras can accurately identify lane markings or the position of speed limit signs. They process each captured image into data, subsequently packaging it into packets for uploading. This data is then overlaid in real time onto the base map for enhanced accuracy. The collaborative efforts between Mobileye and automotive manufacturers like Volkswagen, Nissan, and GM are leading to more vehicles being equipped with Mobileye cameras. The combination of image, intelligence, and network connection can achieve a high precision of 10cm.
-
9.
Uber HD map [102]: They employ AI-based methods to automate and assist human-in-the-loop HD map production processes. Machine learning and computer vision are also applied to offline map generation pipelines.
-
10.
Apple Map [103]: It has acquired around 6 million kilometers of driving data, which has resulted in a new underlying map with a much more detailed and accurate perspective. The new map has greatly improved and updated information on highways, beaches, marinas, parks, structures, airports, and other elements. It is already accessible throughout the United States, and it was launched in a number of nations in 2020.
Table 4.
The comparison of various HAD Map.
| HD map | Accuracy | Updating method | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo HD map [94] | Centimeters | Professional mapping vehicles and crowdsourced vehicles | China |
| AMAP HD map [95] | cm | Professional mapping vehicles and crowdsourced vehicles | China |
| NavInfo HD map [96] | - | Crowdsourced data, UGC, OEMs | China |
| HERE HD map [97] | cm | Crowdsourced data and satellite imagery | North America and Western Europe |
| TomTom HD map [98] | 15-20 cm | Professional equipped vehicles and crowdsource | U.S., Europe and East Asia |
| Dynamic map and cooperation area [99] | Centimeters | Professional mapping vehicles and crowdsourced vehicles | Japan and U.S. |
| Waymo HD map [100] | 10 cm, low efficiency, long cycle and high cost | Crowdsourced vehicles | U.S. |
| Mobileye HD map [101] | Centimeters | Professional mapping vehicles | U.S. |
| Uber HD map [102] | - | Professional mapping vehicles | U.S. |
| Apple map [103] | - | Professional mapping vehicles | U.S. |
4.2.2. Opensourced HAD map
Several companies have made significant contributions by open-sourcing their High-Definition (HD) map datasets to foster the advancement of autonomous driving technology. These datasets are instrumental in the development and refinement of autonomous vehicle technologies. Among these notable contributions are the NAVER LABS HD map Dataset [110], the Lyft LEVEL 5 OPEN DATA Perception Dataset [109], and the Argoverse Dataset by Argo.ai [111], each offering unique features and data types (See Table 5):
-
1.NAVER LABS HD map Dataset: This dataset consists of three data layers. These layers can be explained as:
-
(a)3D Road Layout: This layer comprises a detailed representation of the road’s surface, including the types and positions of visual elements such as lanes, road markings, crosswalks, and speed bumps.
-
(b)LiDAR Feature Data: It includes 3D LiDAR point clouds of the static road environment, meticulously captured by MMS vehicles and enriched with semantic annotations for each data point.
-
(c)Visual Feature Data: This segment offers compact, discriminative, and invariant across various viewing situations. These features are essential for localization and matching purposes.
The dataset is exclusively accessible to Korean scholars and groups, reflecting the sensitive nature of the map data.
-
(a)
-
2.
Lyft LEVEL 5 OPEN DATA Perception Dataset: Lyft has included human-labeled 3D bounding boxes of traffic agents and an underlying HD spatial semantic map in Lyft LEVEL 5 OPEN DATA Perception Dataset to supplement the raw camera and LiDAR data.
-
3.
Argoverse Dataset by Argo.ai: This dataset is designed to enhance the capability of autonomous vehicles in environmental perception. It includes exceptionally detailed High-Definition (HD) maps, a notable inclusion for large-scale data collection in autonomous driving. These maps feature an array of geometric and semantic details, including lane centerlines, lane directions, and drivable areas. This dataset marks a significant advancement in providing comprehensive spatial data for free. The rich data repository offered by Argo.ai facilitates the development of refined vision algorithms which is pivotal in equipping self-driving cars with the ability to navigate complex urban scenes safely.
Table 5.
Comparative between different HD map datasets.
| Dataset | Lyft Level 5 [109] | NAVER LABS HD map Dataset [110] | Argoverse[111] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensors | 7 cameras and 3 laser scanners | 10 cameras and 2 laser scanners | 2 laser scanners, 7 cameras, and 2 front stereo cameras |
| Annotation | 55000+ 3D manual annotation | contain about 130k images as well as 6DoF camera poses for training and validation | HD map with geometric shape and semantic information |
| Map information | Surface map for safe driving, and semantic map of the underlying high-definition space | 3D Road Layout, LiDAR Feature Data, and Visual Feature Data | Geometric lane vector map, grid map of the drivable area, and grid map with actual height |
| Map content | More than 4000 lane sections, 197 crosswalks, 60 stop signs, 54 parking areas, 8X speed bumps, 11X speed bumps | 3D location information, including lanes, road signs, crosswalks, intersections, and overspeed stops | (1) Two HD maps with lane centerline, traffic direction, and ground height (2) An API for connecting map data with sensor information |
| Data size | 350+Scenes at 60-90 Minutes Long, 30K LiDAR Point Clouds, 1.3M 3D Annotations | - | 3D tracking annotation with 113 scenes 290KM |
4.3. HAD map update
Automated driving requires highly accurate and real-time updates of the HAD maps. In instances where the HAD map is not updated in a timely manner, discrepancies between the map and the actual environment can arise. Such error may lead to the erroneous decisions by the autonomous driving system, posing major safety hazards and increasing the risk of traffic accidents, thereby compromising the safety of intelligent vehicles [1]. Currently, there are two primary approaches to updating the HAD map database: the centralized update method and the crowd-sourced method [112], [113].
4.3.1. Centralized update
The centralized method is often considered the state-of-the-art method since this method utilizes a dedicated fleet of mapping vehicles equipped with a highly accurate GPS sensor, 360-degree camera, and LiDAR sensors [73], [75]. Due to the high cost of the vehicle, the number of these specialized vehicles is limited. Thus, the update frequency provided by this method is not sufficient[112], [113]. For example, Google updates the map database using a street view vehicle fleet. In 2012, there were only 250 vehicles actively roaming around on streets and freeways worldwide. Another mapping company named HERE used a vehicle fleet of a little above 200 cars to do mapping by the end of 2015. These examples show that even giant companies cannot satisfy a timely map update. Therefore, the future outlook of the autonomous vehicle presented back in 2016 stated that the crowdsourcing method of the map-building framework by large fleets of autonomous vehicles equipped with onboard sensors would be the future [114], [115].
4.3.2. Crowdsourced Update
While centralized mapping methods are often favored for their quality, crowdsourced approaches are increasingly recognized for their ability to incorporate the most current information into existing maps, a key aspect of map updates. For example, research [9] performs an update by lane line merging through hierarchical clustering. Study [116] introduced a scoring system grounded in consistency, spatial fit, and coverage, refining new data integration into existing HAD maps using graph calculations (See Fig. 18). A similar graph-based method was used in [117], assuming the presence of a monocular camera and basic GPS in vehicles, to achieve cross-correlation between landmarks and centimeter-level accuracy using 1000 passing vehicle data. Research [118] focused on the semantic alignment of lane features from visual odometry, enhancing the reconstruction process through edge refinement (See Fig. 19).
Fig. 18.
Three stages of mapping based on crowdsourced data, which consisted of (a) smoothed trajectories, (b) aligned trajectories, and (c) learning. This result is extracted from Liebner et al. [116] works.
Fig. 19.
The pipeline and result for crowdsourced 3D edge map reconstruction. The figure is obtained from Herb et al. [118] works.
Pioneering work by Aijazi et al. [119] established the pipeline where map update is not a given situation but a situation that needs to be first detected and then updated. In [12], they approach the problem by first predicting whether the change has happened through a boosted particle filter. They assess the change based on the road-edge geometry in the visual landmark layer. Pannen et al. [120] considered a broader range of road sections with crowdsourced lane feature data, prioritizing areas with the highest update probability. Jo et al. [121] introduced SLAMCU, a SLAM approach that includes change detection. Heo et al. [122] proposed a novel cross-domain deep learning framework to align map data with real-time semantic layer detections. Zhang et al. [123] envisioned crowdsourced data comprising advanced sensors and processing units, conducting real-time change detection experiments. Using synthetic data, [124] developed a data-driven approach to detect map changes in real scenarios. Finally, [74] conducted frequent updates based on bus and taxi data in Seoul, an extension of the method proposed in [115]. A detailed comparison of centralized versus crowdsourced map updates is presented in Table 6.
Table 6.
The comparison between centralized and crowdsourced approaches.
| Content | Centralized | Crowdsourced |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment | Professional mobile mapping systems, Limited quantity | Ordinary vehicles equipped with low-cost sensors, abundant crowdsourcing data |
| Data | Laser point cloud, high-resolution camera, and other high-precision data obtained by MMS | Track, photo, video, and other low-cost sensing data |
| Precision | high-precision centimeter level | Low precision up to sub-meter or meter |
| Period | Updated quarterly/monthly | Update by month/week/day |
| Cost | High | Low |
| Worker | Surveying and mapping staff with professional training | Volunteers, public and other non-professional surveying and mapping personnel |
| Characteristic | High-precision, low efficiency, long cycle, and high cost | Limited precision, high efficiency, real-time update and low-cost |
| Suitable scenarios | Reconstruction of large-scale new roads | Update of a few map changes with random distribution |
5. Application of HAD map
Given the quality of the HAD map’s information, numerous important use case applications exist. The most common are localization, cooperative perception, and intelligent decision support. Below, the explanation of each application is elaborated.
5.1. High-precision localization based on HAD map
A requirement for autonomous vehicle navigation, decision-making, and control is high-precision and reliable self-vehicle localization [125], [126], [127]. Theoretically centimeter-level localization findings are theoretically possible using high-precision localization techniques, such as GNSS based on differential RTK (D-RTK). The GNSS signal may be blocked by nearby structures and trees in practical applications, such as urban settings, leading to a significant localization divergence. When GNSS positioning is unsuccessful, the dead reckoning (DR) technology based on an IMU can offer correction, but a cumulative inaccuracy will invariably result from long-term GNSS signal loss. Moreover, the cost of the D-RTK and IMU systems prevents them from being used commercially. Map-based localization has been quite popular as an alternative strategy since it may be used with other localization techniques [128], [129]. After its initial release, HD maps have become incredibly common in the fields of intelligent vehicles, to list just a few [128], [130]. Road elements on HD maps are more precisely detailed than conventional navigation maps [21]. Several map-building companies have accumulated HD map datasets on a significant scale using several standards, such as NDS [64] and LDM [65]. The common method for creating HD maps is to use MMS [73], [75] that are outfitted with high-precision sensors, such as LiDAR, RTK, and IMU, with centimeter-level accuracy. The generated map, which includes localization information, can help autonomous vehicles plan their positions and trajectories. A dense point cloud feature and a sparse vector landmark feature are two ways that HD map’s localization feature can be broken down; these two types of features are referred to as point cloud HD map and vector HD map, respectively.
5.1.1. Point cloud feature-based localization
GNSS systems cannot meet the demanding requirements for autonomous vehicles’ self-localization in several environments. LiDAR-based localization offers a promising solution and can be divided into SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) and map-based techniques. SLAM methods have two main categories: feature-based [131] and scan-based [132]. Typically, localization based on SLAM suffers from an error accumulation problem [133]. In contrast, many researchers focus on vehicle localization in urban areas using LiDAR and priori known maps due to the significance of localization accuracy for autonomous driving in complex urban scenarios.
The original point cloud scanned by a LiDAR sensor, which preserves the point cloud’s raw geometric data, forms the basis of the point cloud HD map. State-of-the-art map-based localization methods use point cloud HD maps to estimate vehicle pose accurately. The vehicle has a LiDAR sensor, and the LiDAR scans match the point cloud map. Yoneda et al. [134] use the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) method to match the real-time LiDAR scan with the point cloud map. Kato et al. [135] Kato et al. implement ICP with Normal Distribution Transformation (NDT) for matching to obtain a stable localization. Levinson [136] built the point cloud map in a probabilistic cell representation, modeling the mean and variance of reflectivity and location of each cell. Therefore, the reflectivity feature of point cloud points on the map can be utilized in the map-matching process. Ding et al. [137] makes the LiDAR intensity-based map matching algorithm better by combining intensity and altitude cues in a way that adapts to different road conditions. This makes sure that localization is accurate even when the conditions are bad. Based on it, [137] adaptively fuses the map-matching result with a tightly coupled LiDAR inertial odometry to obtain a more accurate pose estimation. Bauer et al. [138] The localization performance has been demonstrated to achieve 10 cm or less localization error by benefiting from the dense geometric feature of the point cloud.
5.1.2. Vector landmark feature-based localization
Compared to the point cloud HD map, the lightweight vector HD map is more adaptable and simple to use. In contrast to the original point cloud HD map [128], the vectorized HD map format is far more lightweight and consists of static vectorized semantic features like lane lines, poles, and traffic signs. For mass-produced vehicles, matching the vector HD map with the affordable camera is an engineering and business-friendly option [126]. Researchers have worked hard to align the camera and the vector HD map. The fundamental idea behind it is to find semantic HD map landmarks in the image. The vehicle position may be made as efficient as possible by lining up the 3D landmarks in the vector HD map corresponding to the recognized landmarks in the image. Pink [139] employs aerial pictures to extract lane markings and their locations to create a lane-level map. They then use a straightforward ICP method to compare the lane marking feature in the image with the pre-built map. In addition, several different methods are employed, including direct point comparison [140], [141]. Later work improved the map-matching localization by adding more sensors, like GNSS and IMU, to an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) architecture. Tao et al. suggested integrating lost GPS, dead reckoning, and map-matching information from visual lane markings using the EKF fusion framework [142]. The video camera system uses lane markers to determine the vehicle’s lateral distance and heading angle. They demonstrated the viability and potential of a vision-based map-matching approach for localization applications utilizing pre-built lane-level maps.
5.2. Cooperative perception based on HAD map
HAD map is supplementary in improving the perception’s performance and accuracy, especially in cooperative perception, which has been widely applied in autonomous vehicle areas. This subsection analyzes the role the high-precision map plays in improving perception.
5.2.1. Expand the perception range
Cooperative perception information needs temporal and partial alignment [143]. HAD map can act as a container that stores the multi-source asynchronous sensing information from cooperative perception and distributes it to each vehicle, thus making over-the-horizon perception possible. Kim et al. [144] showed the demo of see-through visualization as a subfunction of over-the-horizon perception. Xiao et al. proposed a unified multi-target positioning framework that could handle the situation of occlusion perception and perception out of range [11]. Jiang et al. [145] creates a new map container concept that can extend the perception range to see around the corner when the connected vehicle can detect the moving obstacle, as illustrated in Fig. 20.
Fig. 20.
The illustration of expansion in perception range, where the ego vehicle can see around the corner through perception data collected by connected vehicle via the map. The figure is obtained from Jiang et al. [145] works.
5.2.2. Provide priori information
Priori mapping methods have been widely adopted by state-of-the-art vehicles, such as Google, Uber, and Navya Arma vehicles [146]. HAD maps provide centimeter-accurate priori map information to AVs and continually update map information based on collected sensor data [1]. Here are some applications based on a priori map. Obstacle detection is done by observing differences between the priori map and the current sensor data [146]. Yang et al. exploited priori knowledge from HAD map for 3D object detection [10]. Xiao et al. created a small semantic map model and a method for choosing landmarks ahead of time that can make alignment easier with onboard measurement [129]. Ghallabi double-checked the detected road sign to be valid if a correspondent road sign exists in the HAD map [147]. Many practices implement maps to store perception information. Rauch et al. modeled Car2X-based perception as a virtual sensor to integrate into a high-level sensor data architecture [148], [149]. Kim et al. built a multivehicle system and explored cooperative perception, where sensing information was dealt with as a 2-D map, and cooperative perception was handled by map merging [150]. Xiao et al. extended the concept of HAD map to a map container, a theoretical model that solves the problem of cooperative perception. It makes the driving environment space using data from various onboard sensors and the HAD map. It then estimates the vehicle’s state using multi-source asynchronous redundant data and adds the HAD map’s non-sensorized data on top of that. Moreover, complete estimating the state quantity in the driving environment space [11]. From the review above, the HAD map is a stable base and a powerful supplement to the cooperative perception of ICVs.
5.3. Intelligent decision support based on HAD map
Besides perception, the HAD map also plays an important role in the decision-making process of an autonomous vehicle. This subsection focuses on the decision-making roles that HAD maps can support, such as navigation and planning.
5.3.1. Navigation
Navigation is an important part of autonomous driving decision-making and is also called mission planning [26], [36], [151], [152]. In early autonomous driving, navigation information only used static information the route network definition file (RNDF), waypoints, and road topology for navigation. Subsequently, with the introduction and widespread use of lane-level maps, road-level navigation algorithms are gradually applied to lane-level navigation [153]. Many methods often establish a special map topology based on the lane-level map for road search. At the same time, different types of costs are also considered when creating the topology map. After that, as the map contains more and more dynamic traffic information based on the distance, the navigation algorithm also considers traffic congestion, fuel consumption, and other data accordingly.
5.3.2. Planning
With the development of autonomous driving technology, adding semantic information in the map has further assisted the trajectory planning algorithm[154]. For example, some methods use point clouds to establish a potential field and perform trajectory planning based on the potential field, and some methods use information in a feature map to construct a cost function for trajectory planning. In recent years, with the development of learning-based planning algorithms, more and more planning methods rely on specific knowledge to make decisions [155]. Although this “knowledge” is not stored in the map for the time being, this information is related to geographic features, such as information related to cognitive state, state transition probability, and reward function. Using this information in trajectory planning also helps trajectory planning algorithms, as shown by Diaz-Diaz et al. [156] in Fig. 21.
Fig. 21.
The use of OpenDRIVE standard in map monitoring and path planning tasks on CARLA. The figure is obtained from Diaz-Diaz et al. [156] works.
6. Futures and challenges
This section emphasizes the difficulties that will need to be overcome in the development of high-quality map technology. Here, we emphasize the significance of real-time dynamic updates, a unified map model, strong localization, map data confidence, V2X technology, and the security of map data. Furthermore, we complete this section with a future outlook on the HAD map industry as a whole.
6.1. Challenges
6.1.1. Real-time dynamic update of HAD map
The real-time dynamic updating of automated driving maps is still challenging, especially for the crowd-sourced map update, which is mainly based on low-cost sensors. How to achieve high-precision maps based on visual data with limited accuracy? Due to the limited mapping accuracy of visual data and the lack of effective scale information, how to ensure the high accuracy and reliability of map element reconstruction based on visual data remains to be solved and broken through. Meanwhile, it is hard to combine data from multiple vehicles and sources that are accurate because the visual data collected by different vehicle ends is different in terms of angle, space-time scale, and other factors. The data from the different vehicle ends is also not always accurate because of things like positioning and matching errors, false detections, and missed detections. This makes it hard to combine data from multiple vehicles that is accurate. How to ensure the accuracy, and reliability of HAD map crowd-sourced updates is worth studying and facing challenges.
6.1.2. Unified multi-layer HAD map model
Though HAD maps have been widely considered a key technology for autonomous driving, the key challenge for HAD maps is determining the levels of geometric, semantic, and real-time information to add to the standard map. Commercial use of HD maps also differs from research use depending on the application, and characteristics such as redundancy, compatibility, modularity, and interoperability are all major considerations that factor into the model and the data size of the map. A unified and universal multi-layer map model for automated driving maps is lacking. Currently, the existing automated driving map models are not unified in design, expression, interface, and other aspects. It is necessary to closely combine the actual needs of automated driving, especially in the face of complex road traffic scenarios in China, to establish a unified auto-mated driving map model that supports all elements, flexible expansion, and real-time updates.
6.1.3. Robust localization based on HAD map and other sensors
Although there are some localization algorithms at present, robust positioning still has some challenges in the face of complex traffic scenarios, especially low-cost, high-precision localization at the vehicle end. In the case of loss of GNSS signals at the vehicle end, achieving stable, reliable, and low-cost high-precision positioning in various complex traffic scenarios is a big challenge. Additionally, changes in lighting, weather, and other environmental factors can affect the performance of sensors like LiDAR and cameras. HAD maps may also not accurately reflect environmental changes, such as construction or road damage. Compounding with the first challenge, the accuracy of the HAD map is critical to achieving accurate localization in ever-changing dynamic environments as illustrated in Fig. 22.
Fig. 22.
The illustration of the general concept of HAD map-based localization algorithm. The figure is obtained from Zheng and Wang [157] works.
6.1.4. The confidence level of map data
Maps have been helpful in assisting in navigational tasks and localization, perception, planning, and decision. These important tasks can ensure safety in several driving scenarios. However, the reliability of the map data proposed has its limitations. For example, even though the research direction trends towards the crowdsourcing method of a map update, there remains the challenge of putting a system in place to guarantee the map data is accurate and precise in every scenario. To address this challenge, a framework to quantify the reliability factor of the map data according to the time of the update or the number of updates that have happened in a given area can be a potential solution. In the meantime, many articles always assume map data is a reliable information source. However, there are still many uncertainties in the construction process that have not been considered.
6.1.5. The combination of V2X technology
Through the perspective of a single vehicle, the HAD map represents a vast amount of information that must be downloaded and processed before being used to supplement sensor fusion failure scenarios. However, with the addition of vehicle-to-everything (V2X) applications, HAD maps can be considered a cloud solution where the amount of data can be optimized. The map itself can be broken down into static elements that act as ground truth and dynamic real-time elements that could be shared amongst vehicle nodes, thus lowering both the pre-processing and transmission requirements. Real-time traffic information could be transferred from vehicular nodes to the roadside unit (RSU) infrastructure, effectively building and updating the HAD map through a fleet of autonomous vehicles. The transmission of the real-time portion of the HAD map has been considered from the power and communication efficiency perspective. Though present-day HD maps have been built with top-end professional mapping vehicles, as sensor technology and quality have progressed and the barrier cost has been lowered, the potential for autonomous vehicles to create their high-definition maps has also been explored with promising results in accuracy.
6.1.6. The policy and security of HAD map
Accurate 3D map information is related to national defense security. Therefore, strict laws and regulations have been implemented for the HAD map industry. In autonomous driving, HAD maps contain highly detailed and accurate geographical information, making them even more important to national security than traditional navigation electronic maps. For the security of HAD maps, in the process of uploading and publishing HAD maps, it is very important to ensure the security of geographic information by introducing bias and encrypting the data processing module. It is difficult to ensure the timeliness of map data updates and the security of real-time transmission of updated data from many sources by using the traditional offline processing mode of navigation electronic map data plus bias encryption. The policy about data security on the HAD map in China is designed to ensure national security. There is a lack of standards and specifications related to key technologies involved in high-precision maps, which requires the cooperation of government, industries, universities, and research units in the industry. At the same time, laws and regulations must be further promoted to support the development of automated driving, high-precision map-related technology, and industry progress reasonably.
6.2. Future outlook
The future outlook for HAD map technology in the autonomous driving space is poised for significant growth and transformation. As self-driving cars become increasingly common on the road, the industry is shifting towards a paradigm where strong perception technology takes precedence over traditional positioning technologies. Here is the author’s take on the future outlook for HD map technology in this evolving landscape:
-
1.
Rise in Autonomous Vehicle Deployment: With each passing year, we can expect a substantial increase in the deployment of autonomous vehicles on the road. As more self-driving cars navigate our streets, the demand for accurate and up-to-date HD maps will grow exponentially. These maps will be a critical foundation for safe and efficient autonomous driving.
-
2.
Enhanced Perception Technology: One of the most significant trends in the industry is the emphasis on advanced perception technology. Autonomous vehicles will increasingly rely on a combination of sensors, cameras, LiDAR, and radar to navigate their surroundings. HD maps will complement these sensors by providing high-precision reference data, allowing vehicles to validate their perceptions and make informed decisions.
-
3.
Positioning Technology Approach: Traditional positioning technology, such as GPS, is inherently limited in terms of accuracy, especially in downtown, urban canyons, or challenging weather conditions. Autonomous vehicles will rely less on global positioning systems and more on real-time sensor fusion and perception to determine their exact location. HD maps will assist in localization by matching sensor data with known map features with high precision and accuracy.
-
4.
Dynamic Map Updating: The future of HD maps will involve dynamic updating in real-time or near-real-time. Maps will no longer be static but will evolve continuously to reflect changing road conditions, construction, accidents, and other dynamic factors. This real-time map data will be essential for route planning, obstacle avoidance, and decision-making in autonomous vehicles.
-
5.
Collaborative Mapping: To keep maps accurate and updated, there will be greater collaboration between automakers, tech companies, municipalities, and even individual vehicles. Crowdsourced data and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication will play a significant role in maintaining the integrity of HD maps. This collaboration will result in more comprehensive and reliable mapping datasets.
-
6.
Safety and Regulation: As autonomous vehicles become more common, safety regulations and standards will evolve accordingly. HD maps will play a crucial role in ensuring the safety of self-driving cars, as they can provide a high level of redundancy and validation for the vehicle’s perception systems. Regulatory bodies will work closely with the industry to establish map accuracy, updating, and security guidelines.
7. Conclusion
HAD map is a necessary database for automotive driving and has become the focus of countries at home and abroad. HAD map plays an important role in automated driving perception, positioning, control, decision-making, planning, and other aspects. However, achieving real-time dynamic updates of high-precision maps is difficult, seriously affecting the safety and reliability of automotive driving. Although the crowdsourcing of high-precision map updates still faces many challenges, the increased effort from governments, industry, universities, and research centers on this domain shows a positive outlook on the future of low-cost HD map building and maintenance. The rapid development and application of automated driving will also affect the advancement of HAD map technology in terms of its technology, policy, laws, and regulations.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this work.
Acknowledgments
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20104, 52102464), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (L231008), and Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program By BAST (BYESS2022153).
Biographies
Mengmeng Yang received the PhD degree in Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing from Wuhan University, Wuhan, China in 2018. She is currently an assistant research professor at Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. Her research interests include autonomous vehicles, high precision digital map, and sensor fusion.
Kun Jiang received the BS degree in mechanical and automation engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China in 2011. Then he received the master degree in mechatronics system and the PhD degree in information and systems technologies from University of Technology of Compiegne (UTC), Compiegne, France, in 2013 and 2016, respectively. He is currently an assistant research professor at Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. His research interests include autonomous vehicles, high precision digital map, and sensor fusion.
Benny Wijaya received the BS degree in mechanical engineering from University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia in 2015. Then he received the Master degree in mechanical engineering from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China in 2020. He is currently working toward the PhD degree at the School of Vehicle and Mobility in Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. His research interests include, sensor fusion, confidence modelling, and high definition mapping and update for autonomous driving.
Tuopu Wen received the BS degree from Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China in 2018. He is currently working toward the PhD degree at the School of Vehicle and Mobility of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. His research interests include computer vision, high definition map, and high precision localization for autonomous driving.
Jinyu Miao received the BS degree in Automation from Beihang University, Beijing, China in 2019. Then he received the MSc degree in Control Science and Engineering from Beihang University, Beijing, China in 2022. He is currently pursuing the PhD degree at the School of Vehicle and Mobility in Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. His research interests include highprecision localization and mapping for autonomous driving.
Jin Huang received his PhD and BE degrees from the College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, China, in 2012 and 2006. He is also a joint PhD in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, during 2009–2011. He started his career at School of Software, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, since 2013. He is now an associate professor at School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University. His research interests include artificial intelligence in Intelligent Transportation Systems, dynamics control, fuzzy engineering, etc.
Diange Yang received his PhD in Automotive Engineering from Tsinghua University in 2001. He is now a professor at the school of vehicle and mobility at Tsinghua University. He currently serves as the director of the Tsinghua University Development & Planning Division. His research interests include autonomous driving, environment perception, and HD map. He has more than 180 technical publications and 100 patents. He received the National Technology Invention Award and Science and Technology Progress Award in 2010, 2013, 2018, and the Special Prize for Progress in Science and Technology of China Automobile Industry in 2019.
References
- 1.Seif H.G., Hu X. Autonomous driving in the iCity-HD maps as a key challenge of the automotive industry. Engineering. 2016;2(2):159–162. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles, 2021, 10.4271/J3016_202104.
- 3.Kuutti S., Fallah S., Katsaros K., et al. A survey of the state-of-the-art localization techniques and their potentials for autonomous vehicle applications. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018;5(2):829–846. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2812300. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cai H., Hu Z., Huang G., et al. Integration of GPS, monocular vision, and high definition (HD) map for accurate vehicle localization. Sensors (Switzerland) 2018;18(10) doi: 10.3390/s18103270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ma W.C., Urtasun R., Tartavull I., et al. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2019. Exploiting sparse semantic HD maps for self-driving vehicle localization; pp. 5304–5311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xiao Z., Yang D., Wen T., et al. Monocular localization with vector HD map (MLVHM): A low-cost method for commercial IVs. Sensors (Switzerland) 2020;20(7):1–24. doi: 10.3390/s20071870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jeong J., Cho Y., Kim A. HDMI-Loc: Exploiting high definition map image for precise localization via bitwise particle filter. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 2020;5(4):6310–6317. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3013881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jang C., Cho S., Jeong S., et al. Traffic light recognition exploiting map and localization at every stage. Expert Syst. Appl. 2017;88:290–304. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hirabayashi M., Sujiwo A., Monrroy A., et al. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. vol. 111. 2019. Traffic light recognition using high-definition map features; pp. 62–72. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang B., Liang M., Urtasun R. Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning. vol. 87. 2018. HDNET: Exploiting HD maps for 3D object detection; pp. 146–155. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xiao Z., Yang D., Wen F., et al. A unified multiple-target positioning framework for intelligent connected vehicles. Sensors (Switzerland) 2019;19(9):1–22. doi: 10.3390/s19091967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Izquierdo R., Parra I., Fernández-Llorca D., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings (ITSC) 2018. Multi-radar self-calibration method using high-definition digital maps for autonomous driving; pp. 2197–2202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Paden B., Čáp M., Yong S.Z., et al. A survey of motion planning and control techniques for self-driving urban vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2016;1(1):33–55. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2016.2578706. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jian Z., Zhang S., Chen S., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2019. High-definition map combined local motion planning and obstacle avoidance for autonomous driving; pp. 2180–2186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mobileye, watch how our camera-only AV handles the streets of Munich, 2020, https://www.mobileye.com/blog/munich-av-video/.
- 16.Liu Y., Song M., Guo Y. IEEE. 2019. An incremental fusing method for high-definition map updating; pp. 4251–4256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.J.P. Leite, A brief History of GPS In-Car Navigation, 2018, https://ndrive.com/brief-history-gps-car-navigation/.
- 18.pandazis J. Technical Report. 2002. Final Report, IST-1999-11206 NextMAO Project, Delierable D1, NextMAP Consortium. [Google Scholar]
- 19.EDMap . Technical Report. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration; 2004. Enhanced Digital Mapping Project Final Report. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ziegler J., Bender P., Schreiber M., et al. Making bertha drive-an autonomous journey on a historic route. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2014;6(2):8–20. doi: 10.1109/MITS.2014.2306552. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jiang K., Yang D., Liu C., et al. A flexible multi-layer map model designed for lane-level route planning in autonomous vehicles. Engineering. 2019;5(2):305–318. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Technical Report. ISO/TC 204 Intelligent Transport Systems; 2018. Intelligent Transport Systems-Co-Operative ITS-Local Dynamic Map. [Google Scholar]; https://www.iso.org/standard/69433.html
- 23.M. Dannehy, 3D Maps: Beyond automotive, 2016, https://goo.gl/WpwiiX.
- 24.Yang D.G., Jiang K., Zhao D., et al. Intelligent and connected vehicles: Current status and future perspectives. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2018;61(10):1446–1471. [Google Scholar]
- 25.H. V., Solving the challenges of HD mapping for smart navigation in autonomous cars, 2020, https://www.intellias.com/solving-the-challenges-of-hd-mapping-for-smart-navigation-in-autonomous-cars.
- 26.Liu R., Wang J., Zhang B. High definition map for automated driving: Overview and analysis. J. Navig. 2020;73(2):324–341. doi: 10.1017/S0373463319000638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.ISO/TC 204 Intelligent transport systems . Technical Report. 1996. ISO/TR 14825:1996 Geographic Data Files (GDF) [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pan Z., Jingnan L. A generalized data model of high definition maps. Acta Geod. Cartogr. Sin. 2021;50(11):1432–1446. doi: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20210254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zheng X., Li Y., Duan D., et al. Multivehicle multisensor occupancy grid maps (MVMS-OGM) for autonomous driving. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022;9(22):22944–22957. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3187827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.A. Elfes, Occupancy grids: A stochastic spatial representation for active robot perception, 2013, http://rpg.ifi.uzh.ch/research_mav.html.
- 31.Moravec H.P. Sensor fusion in certainty grids for mobile robots. Sensor Devices Syst. Rob. 1989;9(2):253–276. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-74567-6_19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xue H., Fu H., Ren R., et al. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS) IEEE; 2019. Real-time 3D grid map building for autonomous driving in dynamic environment; pp. 40–45. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Han S.J., Kim J., Choi J. 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Proceedings. 2015. Effective height-grid map building using inverse perspective image; pp. 549–554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Badue C., Guidolini R., Carneiro R.V., et al. Self-driving cars: A survey. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021;165:113816. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113816. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cadena C., Carlone L., Carrillo H., et al. Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age. IEEE Trans. Rob. 2016;32(6):1309–1332. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2016.2624754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu J., Xiao J., Cao H., et al. Proceedings of China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2019. The status and challenges of high precision map for automated driving; pp. 266–276. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Beeson P., Modayil J., Kuipers B. Factoring the mapping problem: Mobile robot map-building in the hybrid spatial semantic hierarchy. Int. J. Rob. Res. 2010;29(4):428–459. doi: 10.1177/0278364909100586. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Luo K., Casas S., Liao R., et al. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2021. Safety-oriented pedestrian occupancy forecasting; pp. 1015–1022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mutz F., Oliveira-Santos T., Forechi A., et al. What is the best grid-map for self-driving cars localization? An evaluation under diverse types of illumination, traffic, and environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021;179:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mentasti S., Matteucci M. Proceedings of AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE) 2019. Multi-layer occupancy grid mapping for autonomous vehicles navigation. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rusu R.B., Cousins S. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2011. 3D Is here: Point cloud library (PCL) pp. 1–4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Huang J., Demir M., Lian T., et al. 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2019. An online multi-lidar dynamic occupancy mapping method; pp. 517–522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li J., Zhao J., Kang Y., et al. 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) IEEE; 2019. DL-SLAM: Direct 2.5D LiDAR SLAM for autonomous driving; pp. 1205–1210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Woo A. Multi-objective Mapping and Path Planning using Visual SLAM and Object Detection. University of Waterloo; 2019. Master’s degree thesis. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mataric M. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) vol. 1. 1990. Environment learning using a distributed representation; pp. 402–406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Savelli F., Kuipers B. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) vol. 2. 2004. Loop-closing and planarity in topological map-building; pp. 1511–1517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Garcia-Fidalgo E., Ortiz A. Vision-based topological mapping and localization methods: A survey. Rob. Auton. Syst. 2015;64:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2014.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wei Z., Yang M., Wang L., et al. Customized mobile LiDAR system for manhole cover detection and identification. Sensors (Switzerland) 2019;19(10) doi: 10.3390/s19102422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wan J., Chan A. Proceedings of IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019. Adaptive density map generation for crowd counting; pp. 1130–1139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.I.A. Bârsan, S. Wang, A. Pokrovsky et al. Learning to localize using a LiDAR intensity map, 2020, 2012.10902
- 51.Wijaya B., Jiang K., Yang M., et al. Crowdsourced road semantics mapping based on pixel-wise confidence level. Automot. Innov. 2022;(0123456789) doi: 10.1007/s42154-021-00173-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang Y., Zhou D., Chen S., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2016. Single-image crowd counting via multi-column convolutional neural network; pp. 589–597. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang C., Li H., Wang X., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015. Cross-scene crowd counting via deep convolutional neural networks; pp. 833–841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Idrees H., Saleemi I., Seibert C., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2013. Multi-source multi-scale counting in extremely dense crowd images; pp. 2547–2554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wan J., Luo W., Wu B., et al. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019. Residual regression with semantic prior for crowd counting; pp. 4031–4040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Paz D., Zhang H., Li Q., et al. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2020. Probabilistic semantic mapping for urban autonomous driving applications; pp. 2059–2064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang H., Xue C., Zhou Y., et al. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA. 2021. Visual semantic localization based on HD map for autonomous vehicles in urban scenarios; pp. 11255–11261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.J. Gao, W. Lin, B. Zhao et al. framework: An open-source pytorch code for crowd counting, 2019, 1907.02724
- 59.Gao J., Wang Q., Li X. PCC Net: Perspective crowd counting via spatial convolutional network. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 2020;30(10):3486–3498. doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2019.2919139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jetlund K., Onstein E., Huang L. Information exchange between GIS and geospatial its databases based on a generic model. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019;8(3) doi: 10.3390/ijgi8030141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.D. Marius, OpenDRIVE format specification, 2008, http://www.opendrive.org/download.htm.
- 62.Dupuis M., Strobl M., Grezlikowski H. 2010. Opendrive 2010 and beyond -status and future of the de facto standard for the description of road networks. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zang A., Chen X., Trajcevski G. High definition maps in urban context. SIGSPATIAL Spec. 2018;10(1):15–20. doi: 10.1145/3231541.3231546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.P. Hubertus, M. Schleicher, F. Klebert et al. NDS: The benefits of a common map data standard for autonomous driving (2019) 11.
- 65.Eiter T., Füreder H., Kasslatter F., et al. Towards a semantically enriched local dynamic map. Int. J. Intell. Transp.Syst. Res. 2019;17(1):32–48. doi: 10.1007/s13177-018-0154-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Santa J., Pereñíguez F., Moragón A., et al. 2013 IFIP Wireless Days (WD) 2013. Vehicle-to-infrastructure messaging proposal based on CAM/DENM specifications; pp. 1–7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bender P., Ziegler J., Stiller C. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2014. Lanelets: Efficient map representation for autonomous driving; pp. 420–425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Poggenhans F., Pauls J.H., Janosovits J., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018. Lanelet2: A high-definition map framework for the future of automated driving; pp. 1672–1679. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.A. Forum, http://adasis.org/.
- 70.AECC, Operational behavior of a high definition map application white paper (2020).
- 71.Bisheng Y., Fuxun L., Ronggang H. Progress, challenges and perspectives of 3D LiDAR point cloud processing. Acta Geod. Cartogr. Sin. 2017;46:1509–1516. [Google Scholar]
- 72.E. D. of China Journal of Highway, Transport, Review on China’s automotive engineering research progress: 2017. China J. Highway Transp. 2017;30(6):1–197. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yang M., Wan Y., Liu X., et al. Laser data based automatic recognition and maintenance of road markings from MLS system. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018;107:192–203. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cho M., Kim K., Cho S., et al. Frequent and automatic update of lane-level HD maps with a large amount of crowdsourced data acquired from buses and taxis in Seoul. Sensors (Switzerland) 2023;23(438):1–16. doi: 10.3390/s23010438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yang M., Liu X., Jiang K., et al. Automatic extraction of structural and non-structural road edges from mobile laser scanning data. Sensors (Basel) 2019 doi: 10.3390/s19225030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kumar P., McElhinney C.P., Lewis P., et al. Automated road markings extraction from mobile laser scanning data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observation Geoinf. 2014;32:125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.03.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ma H., Pei Z., Wei Z., et al. Automatic extraction of road markings from mobile laser scanning data. Int. Arch. Photogramm.Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2017;XLII-2/W7:825–830. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-825-2017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Guan H., Li J., Yu Y., et al. Using mobile laser scanning data for automated extraction of road markings. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014;87:93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.11.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mur-Artal R., Montiel J.M.M., Tardós J.D. ORB-SLAM: A versatile and accurate monocular slam system. IEEE Trans. Rob. 2015;31(5):1147–1163. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2015.2463671. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Mur-Artal R., Tardós J.D. ORB-SLAM2: An open-source slam system for monocular, stereo, and RGB-D cameras. IEEE Trans. Rob. 2017;33(5):1255–1262. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2017.2705103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Campos C., Elvira R., Rodríguez J.J.G., et al. ORB-SLAM3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual-inertial, and multimap slam. IEEE Trans. Rob. 2021;37(6):1874–1890. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2021.3075644. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Haala N., Peter, Kremer J., et al. 2008. Mobile LiDAR mapping for 3D point cloud collecation in urban areas: A performance test. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Riveiro B., González-Jorge H., Martínez-Sánchez J., et al. Automatic detection of zebra crossings from mobile LiDAR data. Opt. Laser Technol. 2015;70:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Rezaei M., Amiri M., Mohajeri P., et al. A new algorithm for lane detection and tracking on pulsed field gel electrophoresis images. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2016;157:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.05.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yi S.-C., Chen Y.-C., Chang C.-H. A lane detection approach based on intelligent vision. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2015;42:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tian Y., Gelernter J., Wang X., et al. Lane marking detection via deep convolutional neural network. Neurocomputing. 2018;280:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Applications of Neural Modeling in the new era for data and IT
- 87.Phung S.L., Le M.C., Bouzerdoum A. Pedestrian lane detection in unstructured scenes for assistive navigation. Comput. Vis. Image Understanding. 2016;149:186–196. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2016.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Du H., Xu Z., Ding Y. In: International Conference on Applications and Techniques in Cyber Security and Intelligence. Abawajy J., Choo K.-K. R., Islam R., editors. 2018. The fast lane detection of road using RANSAC algorithm; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ye Y.Y., Hao X.L., Chen H.J. Lane detection method based on lane structural analysis and CNNs. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018;12(6):513–520. doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2017.0143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Quach C.H., Tran V.L., Nguyen D.H., et al. Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advances in Signal Processing, Telecommunications & Computing (SigTelCom) 2018. Real-time lane marker detection using template matching with RGB-D camera; pp. 152–157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kim J., Kim J., Jang G.-J., et al. Fast learning method for convolutional neural networks using extreme learning machine and its application to lane detection. Neural Netw. 2017;87:109–121. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2016.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wong H., Zhang X., Wen T., et al. Proceedings of IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2021. HD-Map aided LiDAR-INS extrinsic calibration; pp. 3136–3143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wang R., Jian Y., Li X.-Y., et al. Proceedings of International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Optoelectronic Imaging/Spectroscopy and Signal Processing Technology. 2018. Designation and verification of road markings detection and guidance method; p. 1062006. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Apollo mapping, https://apollomapping.com/.
- 95.Alibaba, AMAP’s transformation from navigation positioning to high-precision positioning, 2020, https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/amaps-transformation-from-navigation-positioning-to -high-precision-positioning_596546.
- 96.Navinfo HD map, https://navinfo.com/en/hdmap.
- 97.HERE Technologies, HERE HD live map technical paper(2017).
- 98.TomTom International BV, More than 5 million vehicles now rely on TomTom’s maps for automated driving, 2022, https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/01/06/2362115/0/en/More-than-5-million-vehicles-now-rely-on-TomTom-s- maps-for-automated-driving.html.
- 99.Dynamic map and cooperation area, https://www.dynamic-maps.co.jp/en/index.html.
- 100.Building maps for a self-driving car, 2016, https://blog.waymo.com/2019/09/building-maps-for-self-driving-car.html.
- 101.D. Silver, Deep dive on mobileye REM maps, 2021, https://medium.com/self-driving-cars/deep-dive-on-mobileye-rem-maps-4a107d55acf0.
- 102.Uber HD map, https://developer.uber.com/solutions/maps.
- 103.Apple map, https://www.apple.com/maps.
- 104.Autonavi navigation HD, https://mobile.amap.com/.
- 105.TomTom, Extending the vision of automated vehicles with HD maps and ADASIS, https://Www.Tomtom.Com/Products/Hd-Map/(2020) 9.
- 106.Here HD live map | autonomous driving system, https://www.here.com/platform/HD-live-map.
- 107.Waymo, The Waymo driver handbook: How our highly-detailed maps help unlock new locations for autonomous driving, 2020, https://blog.waymo.com/2020/09/the-waymo-driver-handbook-mapping.html.
- 108.Mobileye HD map, https://www.mobileye.com/technology/rem/.
- 109.Lyft level 5 open data dataset, https://level5.lyft.com/dataset/?source=post_page.
- 110.Naver labs - open dataset, https://www.naverlabs.com/datasets.
- 111.Argoverse dateset, https://www.argoverse.org.
- 112.TAŞ M.O., Serhan YAVUZ H., YAZICI A. Proceedings of International Conference on Control Engineering and Information Technology (CEIT) 2018. Updating HD-maps for autonomous transfer vehicles in smart factories; pp. 1–5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kim C., Cho S., Sunwoo M., et al. Crowd-sourced mapping of new feature layer for high-definition map. Sensors (Switzerland) 2018;18(12):1–17. doi: 10.3390/s18124172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kim C., Cho S., Sunwoo M., et al. Updating point cloud layer of high definition (HD) map based on crowd-sourcing of multiple vehicles installed LiDAR. IEEE Access. 2021;9:8028–8046. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kim K., Cho S., Chung W. HD map update for autonomous driving with crowdsourced data. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 2021;6(2):1895–1901. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3060406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Liebner M., Jain D., Schauseil J., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2019. Crowdsourced HD map patches based on road model inference and graph-based slam; pp. 1211–1218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Stoven-Dubois A., Miguel K.K., Dziri A., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2019. A collaborative framework for high-definition mapping; pp. 1845–1850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Herb M., Weiherer T., Navab N., et al. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2019. Crowd-sourced semantic edge mapping for autonomous vehicles; pp. 7047–7053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Aijazi A.K., Checchin P., Trassoudaine L. Automatic removal of imperfections and change detection for accurate 3D urban cartography by classification and incremental updating. Remote Sens. 2013;5(8):3701–3728. doi: 10.3390/rs5083701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Pannen D., Liebner M., Hempel W., et al. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020. How to keep HD maps for automated driving up to date; pp. 2288–2294. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jo K., Kim C., Sunwoo M. Simultaneous localization and map change update for the high definition map-based autonomous driving car. Sensors (Switzerland) 2018;18(9) doi: 10.3390/s18093145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Heo M., Kim J., Kim S. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020. HD map change detection with cross-domain deep metric learning; pp. 10218–10224. [Google Scholar]
- 123.Zhang P., Zhang M., Liu J. Real-time HD map change detection for crowdsourcing update based on mid-to-high-end sensors. Sensors (Switzerland) 2021;21(7):1–12. doi: 10.3390/s21072477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Lambert J., Hays J. Proceedings of Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2021. Trust, but verify: Cross-modality fusion for HD map change detection; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Wen T., Xiao Z., Jiang K., et al. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP) 2019. High precision target positioning method for RSU in cooperative perception; pp. 1–6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Wen T., Xiao Z., Wijaya B., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2020. High precision vehicle localization based on tightly-coupled visual odometry and vector HD map; pp. 672–679. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Jiang K., Zhang X., Qin B., et al. Proceedings of International Forum on Connected Automated Vehicle Highway System through the China Highway & Transportation Society. 2020. Feature-based loop closure detection and optimization for LiDAR mapping. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Wen T., Jiang K., Wijaya B., et al. TM3Loc: Tightly-coupled monocular map matching for high precision vehicle localization. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp.Syst. 2022;23(11):20268–20281. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3176914. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Xiao Z., Jiang K., Xie S., et al. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018. Monocular vehicle self-localization method based on compact semantic map; pp. 3083–3090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Vivacqua R.P.D., Bertozzi M., Cerri P., et al. Self-localization based on visual lane marking maps: An accurate low-cost approach for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp.Syst. 2018;19(2):582–597. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2752461. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Cheng J., Wang Z., Zhou H., et al. DM-SLAM: A feature-based slam system for rigid dynamic scenes. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020;9(4) doi: 10.3390/ijgi9040202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/9/4/202
- 132.Deschaud J.-E. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2018. IMLS-SLAM: Scan-to-model matching based on 3D data; pp. 2480–2485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Khairuddin A.R., Talib M.S., Haron H. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE) 2015. Review on simultaneous localization and mapping (slam) pp. 85–90. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Yoneda K., Tehrani H., Ogawa T., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2014. Lidar scan feature for localization with highly precise 3-D map; pp. 1345–1350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Kato S., Takeuchi E., Ishiguro Y., et al. An open approach to autonomous vehicles. IEEE Micro. 2015;35(6):60–68. doi: 10.1109/MM.2015.133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Levinson J., Thrun S. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2010. Robust vehicle localization in urban environments using probabilistic maps; pp. 4372–4378. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Ding W., Hou S., Gao H., et al. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020. LiDAR inertial odometry aided robust LiDAR localization system in changing city scenes; pp. 4322–4328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Bauer S., Alkhorshid Y., Wanielik G. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2016. Using high-definition maps for precise urban vehicle localization; pp. 492–497. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Pink O. 2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPR Workshops. 2008. Visual map matching and localization using a global feature map; pp. 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Schreiber M., Knöppel C., Franke U. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2013. LaneLoc: Lane marking based localization using highly accurate maps; pp. 449–454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Deusch H., Wiest J., Reuter S., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2014. Multi-sensor self-localization based on maximally stable extremal regions; pp. 555–560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Tao Z., Bonnifait P., Frémont V., et al. Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2013. Mapping and localization using GPS, lane markings and proprioceptive sensors; pp. 406–412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Allig C., Wanielik G. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2019. Alignment of perception information for cooperative perception; pp. 1849–1854. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Kim S.-W., Qin B., Chong Z.J., et al. Multivehicle cooperative driving using cooperative perception: Design and experimental validation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp.Syst. 2015;16(2):663–680. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2337316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 145.K. Jiang, Y. Shi, B. Wijaya et al. Map container: A map-based framework for cooperative perception, 2022, 2208.13226
- 146.Van Brummelen J., O’Brien M., Gruyer D., et al. Autonomous vehicle perception: The technology of today and tomorrow. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg.Technol. 2018;89:384–406. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Ghallabi F., Mittet M.-A., EL-HAJ-SHHADE G., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2019. LIDAR-based high reflective landmarks (HRL)s for vehicle localization in an HD map; pp. 4412–4418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Kim S.-W., Qin B., Chong Z.J., et al. Multivehicle cooperative driving using cooperative perception: Design and experimental validation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp.Syst. 2015;16(2):663–680. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2337316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Rauch A., Klanner F., Rasshofer R., et al. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2012. Car2X-based perception in a high-level fusion architecture for cooperative perception systems; pp. 270–275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Kim S.-W., Liu W. Cooperative autonomous driving: A mirror neuron inspired intention awareness and cooperative perception approach. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2016;8(3):23–32. doi: 10.1109/MITS.2016.2573339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Fankhauser P., Hutter M. 2016. A universal grid map library: Implementation and use case for rough terrain navigation; pp. 99–120. [Google Scholar]; Cham
- 152.Groves P. Artech House; 2007. Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems; p. 800. [Google Scholar]
- 153.Elsheikh M., Noureldin A., Korenberg M. Integration of GNSS precise point positioning and reduced inertial sensor system for lane-level car navigation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp.Syst. 2022;23(3):2246–2261. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3040955. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Choi J. Kinodynamic motion planning for autonomous vehicles. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 2014;11(6):90. doi: 10.5772/58683. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Song H., Luan D., Ding W., et al. Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning. vol. 164. 2022. Learning to predict vehicle trajectories with model-based planning; pp. 1035–1045. [Google Scholar]
- 156.A. Diaz-Diaz, M. Ocana, A. Llamazares et al. HD maps: Exploiting OpenDRIVE potential for path planning and map monitoring, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Proceedings(2022) 1211–1217. 10.1109/IV51971.2022.9827297
- 157.Zheng S., Wang J. Proceedings of International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS) 2018. High definition map-based vehicle localization for highly automated driving: Geometric analysis; pp. 1–8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]






















