Table 2.
RoB2 (risk of bias) assessment
| Author/Year | Domain 1: Randomization process | Domain 2: Deviation from the intended interventions | Domain 3: Missing outcome data | Domain 4: Measurement of the outcome data | Domain 5: Selection of the reported results | RoB-2 final quality assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Curnow et al. [15] | Some concern | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concern |
| 2. Rong et al. [11] | Some concern | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concern |
| 3. Winter et al.[16] | Some concern | Low risk | Some concern | Low risk | High risk | High risk |
| 4. Al jundi et al. [1] | Some concern | Some concern | Low risk | Some concern | Some concern | High risk |
| 5. Frazao [14] | unclear | High risk | unclear | Low risk | High risk | High risk |
| 6. Jackson et al. [10] | Some concern | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concern |
| 7. Helderman et al. [13] | Some concern | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concern |
| 8. Schwarz et al. [12] | High risk | Some concern | Low risk | Some concern | Some concern | High risk |