TABLE 3.
Analysis of assumed t-distributed RS and ES at the Nauholzbach gauge for independence from each other, using the one-sided t-test for two spot checks with different variances (1997 data)
Parameter | RS (n = 16)
|
ES (n = 7)
|
t test t (empirical) | df (empirical) | P(α) (one sided)a | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arithmetic mean | Maximum | SD | Arithmetic mean | Maximum | SD | ||||
Turbidity (NTU) | 1.30 | 3.80 | 0.92 | 47.38 | 93.80 | 37.22 | 3.275 | 6.004 | 0.008b |
pH | 7.18 | 7.50 | 0.19 | 6.98 | 7.30 | 0.25 | 1.819 | 10.311 | 0.049c |
Runoff (liters/s) | 49.29 | 190.00 | 56.25 | 139.06 | 317.00 | 113.84 | 1.983 | 7.748 | 0.044b |
Nitrate (mg/liter) | 6.84 | 10.90 | 2.70 | 11.43 | 13.90 | 2.34 | 4.128 | 15.217 | 0.000b |
Nitrite (mg/liter) | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.000 | 15.000 | 0.167 |
Ammonia (mg/liter) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
Total phosphorus (mg/liter) | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 1.325 | 6.068 | 0.117 |
Borate (mg/liter) | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 1.605 | 9.049 | 0.071 |
CC 20°C (CFU/ml) | 673.06 | 1,730.00 | 534.50 | 5,509.86 | 10,629.00 | 3,746.37 | 3.401 | 6.143 | 0.007b |
CC 37°C (CFU/ml) | 100.94 | 339.00 | 93.64 | 439.43 | 849.00 | 205.85 | 4.166 | 7.477 | 0.002b |
E. coli (CFU/100 ml) | 33.81 | 148.00 | 36.87 | 235.71 | 650.00 | 190.69 | 2.779 | 6.263 | 0.016b |
Coliforms (CFU/100 ml) | 3,300.75 | 15,000.00 | 4,464.67 | 17,114.29 | 42,000.00 | 11,844.61 | 2.994 | 7.009 | 0.010b |
Fecal streptococci (CFU/100 ml) | 41.56 | 400.00 | 99.27 | 207.14 | 620.00 | 205.48 | 2.031 | 7.670 | 0.041b |
C. perfringens (CFU/100 ml) | 4.06 | 31.00 | 7.75 | 66.71 | 155.00 | 65.95 | 2.506 | 6.097 | 0.023b |
Giardia (cysts/100 liters) | 0.11 | 1.10 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.396 | 15.000 | 0.091 |
Cryptosporidium (oocysts/100 liters) | 7.18 | 52.20 | 13.18 | 15.30 | 35.50 | 11.85 | 1.461 | 14.709 | 0.083 |
Values were considered significantly different if the P(α) value was <0.05.
The ES values were significantly greater than the RS values.
The ES values were significantly less than the RS values.