Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 18;14:e78856. doi: 10.2196/78856

Table 2.

Description of aim 3 implementation outcomes.

Evaluation parameter Description Methods Frequency
Theoretical model Evaluate changes in alcohol use and HIV prevention or treatment (eg, PrEPa and ARTb use) using the theory-of-change model measuring change and which sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics are associated with change in order to understand any subpopulations receptive toward the strategic priorities and pathways of change identified by our model. Quantitative surveys at each visit and biomarker data Baseline and 6-month follow-up
Participants’ self-reported fidelity Evaluate completeness of the intervention through a checklist assessing whether specific topics were covered during intervention sessions, including an assessment of the quality of intervention interactions, where participants will rate implementer engagement during intervention sessions. Quantitative surveys at each visit and biomarker data Baseline and 6-month follow-up
Acceptability and uptake of and satisfaction with the intervention Evaluate the organizational, provider, and PLWc acceptability of the intervention, including the number and percentage of sessions attended and IDId feedback following the sessions. Success would be >80% of sessions attended with very good/good feedback postsessions. Mixed methods Postimplementation mixed methods: 6-month survey (all participants), followed by IDIs with 20 providers and 20 participants
Fidelity to training assessment Evaluate sessions (20% recorded and reviewed by the principal investigator) and fidelity to training using a checklist of key parameters. Success would be >80% of sessions supervised following training SOPse. Monitoring forms: comparison of SOPs and audio-recorded MM+f sessions Postimplementation mixed methods: 6-month survey (all participants), followed by IDIs in 20 providers and 20 participants
Feasibility of the intervention Evaluate organizational, provider, and PLW views on the feasibility and scalability of the implementation of the intervention. Mixed methods Postimplementation mixed methods: 6-month survey (all participants), followed by IDIs in 20 providers and 20 participants

aPrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis.

bART: antiretroviral therapy.

cPLW: pregnant and lactating women.

dIDI: in-depth interview.

eSOP: standard operating procedure.

fMM+: Mentor Mothers Plus.