Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Jan 2;21(1):e0340069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340069

The impact of sport engagement on life satisfaction, mental and psychological well-being among athletes

Arif Özsarı 1,*, Halil Uysal 2, Gültekin Lekesiz 1, Mehmet Çağrı Çetin 1, Murat Tilki 2, Erkan Gülgösteren 1, Tolga Tek 3, Mehmet Altın 3
Editor: Mustafa Can KOC4
PMCID: PMC12758687  PMID: 41481604

Abstract

Physical inactivity is a prevalent issue worldwide with concerning implications for public health. Regular participation in sporting activities is associated with numerous physical, psychological, and social benefits. This research aimed to examine the the impact of sport engagement on sportive life satisfaction, mental well-being, and psychological well-being among 473 Turkish athletes, comprising 246 females and 227 males, from various sports disciplines: football, rugby, wrestling, kickboxing, archery, table tennis, taekwondo, volleyball, swimming, cycling, handball, and karate. Research data were collected through validated scales measuring sport engagement, sportive life satisfaction, mental well-being, and psychological well-being. In addition to descriptive statistics, hypotheses formulated within the research model were tested via correlation and multiple regression analyses within the relational model framework. Correlation analysis demonstrated a positive association between sport engagement and all three well-being dimensions. Multiple regression analyses further confirmed that sport engagement significantly and positively predicted sportive life satisfaction, mental and psychological well-being. Sports participation should be encouraged to enhance life satisfaction, mental and psychological well-being.

Introduction

Although physical activity has been proven to play a key role in promoting overall health and well-being, inadequate physical activity in individuals has become a global problem [1]. In addition, the World Health Organization (WHO) and many other scientific studies emphasize the benefits of physical activity on general health [2–5,6,7]. In addition to its physical benefits, sport has many mental and psychological benefits. It can be stated that participation in sports as a part of social life in societies varies in many ways such as entertainment, pleasure, physical development, healthy living and socialization. Participation in sports is a positive experience especially for children and young people and should be encouraged for all individuals [8–10]. Regular participation in sports also plays an important role for adults to adopt a physically and mentally healthy lifestyle [11,12].

It is emphasized that the sense of engagement is an important factor in individuals’ attitudes towards the activities (such as sports) they participate in [13]. Engagement is expressed as the level of closeness to the phenomenon that the individual feels positive emotions [14] and it is also stated that engagement emphasizes a positive situation [15]. Considering that the sense of engagement is an important factor in sports participation, it is stated that engagement in sports and physical activities is the consistent and continuous reflection of emotions such as sportive effort, enjoyment, feeling fit and belief in the activity and the mood of the individual [16]. According to Guillen and Martinez-Alvarado [17], the concept of sport engagement is explained by three basic values: fitness, dedication and internalization. Fitness can be explained by the fact that athletes are always mentally strong; dedication is the individual’s sense of responsibility and fulfillment of their duties with a high level of motivation; and internalization can be explained by the athletes’ immersion in their duties.

In order for individuals to feel happy both in the society they live in and individually, their subjective well-being should follow a positive trend. One of the basic components of subjective well-being is life satisfaction [18]. Life satisfaction is a cognitive process that is closely linked to an individual’s self-assessment of quality of life based on personal standards and mental health indicators such as anxiety and depression that affect overall health and well-being [19]. According to Fleming [20], life satisfaction is the state of being individually satisfied with one’s life. It is expressed as a phenomenon that can shed light not only on a specific situation or event experienced by the individual, but also on the experiences of the individual’s whole life in general [21]. In other words, life satisfaction refers to the judgment processes by evaluating the life of the individual with a holistic approach [22,23]. One can argue that life satisfaction contributes positively to an individual’s ability to resist the difficulties experienced in life [24]. Poor life satisfaction is associated with deterioration of mental and physical health. Physical activity is also a major factor that positively affects life satisfaction [25]. On the other hand, sportive life satisfaction is the application of the concept of life satisfaction to sport. From this point of view, sportive life satisfaction can be defined as evaluating all aspects of sport in a positive way, obtaining pleasure, happiness and satisfaction from these aspects, and perceiving the conditions, expectations, needs, wishes and desires of sporting life within the framework of the criteria determined by the individual [26].

According to WHO [27] mental well-being is a state of mind that enables people to cope with the stresses of life, realize their abilities, learn and work well, and contribute to society. This concept can also be expressed as being emotionally, cognitively and environmentally satisfied with one’s own behavior and not feeling psychological fluctuations [28]. The notion of mental well-being is often used together or interchangeably with the concept of mental health [29,30]. Therefore, we can suggest that mental well-being is a protective factor in important aspects such as health and illness [31]. There is compelling evidence for the effects of sport on mental health and mental well-being [32].

Psychological well-being, on the other hand, refers to the values that an individual possesses and the ability to use these values effectively in order to cope with difficult situations, strengthen oneself, acquire and develop new skills [33]. Psychological well-being, which individuals accept as a reflection of a good life, is an important aspect of social health [7]. According to Ryff [34], it refers to the development and self-realization of the individual by living in a satisfied way with one’s life. Psychological well-being is also said to consist of such basic components as having a positive attitude about oneself and one’s past, maintaining positive relationships with other people, one’s autonomy, one’s environmental awareness, one’s life purpose, and a sense of feeling that one has developed their potential [35].

Today, negative effects of a physically passive lifestyle can be seen not only on an individual level but also in societal terms. As a matter of fact, health expenditures lead countries to face huge financial costs from a financial perspective [36]. WHO reports that one in four adults and four in five adolescents globally do not fulfill the requirements for participation in physical activity and that physical inactivity is one of the main causes of the increase in obesity rates and deaths from noncommunicable diseases, but also emphasizes that participation in physical activities recommended by WHO could prevent the loss of approximately 4–5 million lives annually [5]. Without a positive change in the physical inactivity attitudes of individuals worldwide, approximately 499 million new cases of non-communicable diseases caused by physical inactivity may occur by 2030 and approximately 215 million (43%) of these cases are expected to result from psychological and mental disorders [37].

Participation in regular physical activity has been reported to provide various physical and psychological health benefits [38–43]. Physical activity is particularly linked to improvements in the health and welfare levels of societies, especially when regular participation is ensured [44]. It goes without saying that a physically and mentally healthy society can be created as well as the socialization of individuals as long as sporting activities are practiced regularly by adhering to the sports culture throughout the society. If regular athletic activities are considered a key factor to ensure significant enhancements in individuals’ life satisfaction levels, mental and psychological well-being levels, it can be regarded as a treasure that should be exploited to increase the welfare of communities and accordingly to create productive, efficient and strong societies in terms of communication. This study, which was conducted with athletes participating in various sports branches, aimed to examine the relationship between sportive life satisfaction, mental and psychological well-being levels of individuals participating in sports regularly and the effects of sports at individual and social level. In this context, the importance of this study is increasing by the emphasis placed on paticipation in physical activity in scientific studies, as well as the clear demonstration in reports published by the WHO [5] that a significant portion of health problems can be eliminated through paticipation in physical activity. This study, which examines life satisfaction and mental and psychological well-being levels, paticularly among active athletes, highlights the benefits of physical activity for individuals and society. It is anticipated that this study is essential for encouraging individuals to participate in physical avtivities. This study, which allows for a multifaceted assessment by considering the variables of sports engagement, sportive life satisfaction, mental and psychological well-being, which have been considered separately in previous studies, is considered original.

Method

Research Model

The general survey model is a screening design carried out on the whole population or a group or sample from the population in order to make a general judgment about the entire population consisting of diverse elements. Relational surveys can be conducted with these models. Relational survey models are research models that aim to determine the presence or degree of covariance between variables [45]. In this study, the relational survey model was used. The reason for preferring the relational survey model is that, instead of looking for a cause-effect relationship between variables, the variables included in the model are more likely to have a common effect on individuals’ participation in physical activity and the changes that can be observed afterward. The hypotheses created within the scope of the research model are presented below.

H1: Vigor, which is a subdimension of sport engagement, has a positive effect on the sportive life satisfaction.

H2: Dedication, a subdimension of sport engagement, influences sportive life satisfaction positively.

H3: Vigor, a subdimension of sport engagement, will positively influence mental well-being.

H4: Dedication, a subdimension of sport engagement, has a positive effect on mental well-being.

H5: Vigor, a subdimension of sport engagement, has a positive effect on psychological well-being.

H6: Dedication, a subdimension of sport engagement, influences psychological well-being positively.

The hpyotheses of this study were tested with the variables and sample group selected in accordance with the relational survey model. It is thought that with the change in the sports engagement variable and its subdimensions, changes can also be seen in individuals’ sportive life satisfaction, mental and psychological well-being levels. Hypotheses were created from variables that have high potential to represent motivation to participate in physical activities and positive psychological changes that can be seen afterwards. The flow chart of the research and analysis processes is presented below (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Research and analysis flow chart.

Fig 1

Ethics committee approval information

To ensure ethical conduct, this research underwent a thorough review and received approval from the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Osmaniye Korkut Ata University (document number 2023/1/1, dated 29/03/2023). The study adhered to the research principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent forms were obtained from all Participants.

Participants

In total, 473 athletes, 246 women (52%) and 227 men (48%), selected by convenience sampling method, participated in the study. In convenience sampling technique, researchers attempt to collect data from the easiest and most accessible individuals until they reach the sample size needed for the study [46]. The size or adequacy of sample size for varying population levels can be calculated through various statistical formulas [47]. In quantitatively oriented research, minimum acceptable sample sizes are employed for different populations at the 95% reliability level. Considering the number of research participants (n = 473), this sample size has the capacity to represent a population of ten million [46]. On the other hand, there is a possibility of bias in the convenience sampling method because the sample selection can be determined by the researcher. Due to the lack of randomization, the convenience sampling method has questionable aspects in terms of generalizability. Due to the earthquake in Turkey, the data was collected between July and September 2024. Although ethical approval for the study had previously been obtained, the suspension of sporting activities in the country due to the earthquake caused a delay in data collection. Because it was anticipated that the participating athletes would experience some social and psychological trauma due to the earthquake, data collection was delayed until sporting activities resumed and the athletes returned to routine physical activities. Given that the traumatic environment in which the athletes were located could be misleading, the data collection period was extended, and the study was conducted with athletes who were able to return to active sports. No information that could identify individual participants was accessed during or after data collection.

The findings regarding the demographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. A total of 473 athletes participated in this study, with a relatively balanced gender distribution (52% female, 48% male). The athletes represented a variety of sporting disciplines, with the most common being taekwondo (20.9%, n = 99), archery (19%, n = 90), rugby (13.1%, n = 62), kickboxing (8.9%, n = 42), wrestling (8.2%, n = 39), volleyball (8%, n = 38), football (6.8%, n = 32), table tennis (4.7%, n = 22). The remaining participants represented smaller proportions of athletes from swimming (2.3%, n = 11), cycling (3%, n = 14), handball (2.3%, n = 11), and karate (2.7%, n = 13).

Table 1. Demographic information of the participants.

Gender N %
Female 246 52
Male 227 48
Sport discipline Football 32 6.8
Rugby 62 13.1
Wrestling 39 8.2
Kickboxing 42 8.9
Archery 90 19
Table tennis 22 4.7
Taekwondo 99 20.9
Volleyball 38 8
Swimming 11 2.3
Cycling 14 3
Handball 11 2.3
Karate 13 2.7
Total 473 100

Instruments

Sport Engagement Scale (SES).

Developed by Guillen & Martinez-Alvarado [17] and adapted to Turkish by Kayhan et al. [48], the SES measures sport engagement through two subdimensions: vigor and determination. This 10-item scale utilizes a 7-point Likert-type response format. During the adaptation process of the scale to Turkish, the opinions of 6 expert and correlation analysis were used and it was seen that the Turkish scale had language equivalence. To examine the construct validity of scale, EFA and CFA analyses were conducted with independent sample groups. KMO (0.94) and Barlett’ test of sphericity (χ2 = 3330,65, p < 0,001) showed that the structure was suitable for discovery. It was observed that the sub-dimensions of the scale explained 67.59% of the total variance. Within the scope of CFA analysis, the fit indices of the scale (GFI = .95, TLI = .96, IFI = .97, RMSEA = .07 etc.) were examined and it was observed that they were within the acceptable fit range. The reliability of the scale was examined using Cronbach’ Alpha coefficients and Test-Re-Test (r = 0.94) method. The Cronbach α coefficient of the whole scale was calculated as.91; Cronbach α coefficients of sub-scales are.91 and.77.

Sportive Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS).

Originally developed by Diener et al. [49] to assess general life satisfaction, this scale was adapted for the sports context by Mangan [50] and subsequently translated into Turkish by Somoglu & Cihan [26]. The SLSS comprises 5 items, employs a 7-point Likert-type response style, and measures overall satisfaction with one’s sporting life. In order to test the validity of the scale, content validity index (CVI), EFA and CFA analysis were examined. As a result of content validity analysis, the scale was found to represent the construct (CVI = 0.96). Exploratory factor analysis showed that a one-factor structure explains 81.730% of the total variance. As a result of CFA (RMSEA = .057, SRMR = .011, GFI = .98, NFI = .99, RFI = .98, CFI = .99, IFI = .99), it was observed that the fit indices were within acceptable ranges. The values obtained from the results of Cronbach’s Alpha (0.87) and Test-Re-Test (r = 0.89) reliability analyzes showed that the scale is a reliable tool.

Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS).

The WEMWBS, developed by Tennant et al. [30] and adapted into Turkish by Keldal [51], is a 14 item scale assessing mental well-being through 5-point Likert responses. EFA and CFA analysis were conducted in independent sample groups to prove the validity of the scale. The scale was found to be suitable for factor analysis according to the results of KMO (.85) and Barlett’ test of sphericity (χ2 = 2110,179, p < 0,001). As a result of the analysis, it was found that 51% of the total variance was explained and the scale was unidimensional as in the original form. With CFA analysis, fit indices (χ2/sd = 3.71, NFI = .94, RFI = .93, IFI = .96, CFI = .96, NNFI = .95, RMR = .054) were examined and it was observed that they were within the acceptable fit range. Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.92.

Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS).

Developed by Diener et al. [52] and adapted into Turkish by Telef [53], the PWBS is an 8-item scale measuring psychological well-being on a single dimension. It employs a 7-point Likert-type response design. The scale was found to be suitable for factor analysis according to the results of KMO (.84) and Barlett’ test of sphericity (χ2 = 1007,633, p < 0,01). As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, it was found that the total explained variance was 42% and that the items were grouped under one factor. With CFA analysis, fit indices (χ2/sd = 4,645, NFI = .94, RFI = .92, IFI = .95, CFI = .95, RMR = .04, RMSEA = .08) were examined and it was observed that they were within the acceptable fit range. The reliability study indicated that the Cronbach alpha coefficient was.80.

Statistical analysis

Prior to the main analyses, the data were first screened for missing values and outliers. Skewness and kurtosis values were examined to assess normality, with all values falling within the acceptable range of −1 to +1, which indicated that the assumption of normality was met [54–56]. Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analyses (Cronbach’s Alpha (α)) were conducted on the research scales. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the bivariate relationships between the study variables. Finally, multiple regression analysis was performed, controlling for relevant variables, to investigate the predicted relationships between commitment to sports, satisfaction with sporting life, and mental and psychological well-being. Finally, multiple regression analysis was performed, controlling for relevant variables, to investigate the predicted relationships between commitment to sports, satisfaction with sporting life, and mental and psychological well-being. The basic assumptions of regression analysis, such as normality, linearity, homogeneity, independence, multicollinearity and absence of outliers, were examined. The confidence interval was evaluated as 95%. In addition to descriptive statistics, hypotheses were tested with correlation and multiple regression analyses within the scope of the relational model.

Confirmatory factor analysis is employed to verify the congruence between the predicted scale structure and the empirical data [46]. In this study, CFA was utilized to examine the model fit criteria. The analysis yielded the following fit indices: For the Sport Engagement Scale (SES), CMIN/DF(χ²/df): 2.027, GFI:.973, AGFI:.954, CFI:.975, IFI:.975, TLI:.964, RMSEA:.047. The results of the CFA of the Sportive Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS) were found as CMIN/DF(χ²/df): 3.301, GFI:.973, AGFI:.954, CFI:.975, IFI:.975, TLI:.964, RMSEA:.070. The CFA results for the Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) were CMIN/DF(χ²/df): 2.285, GFI:.981, AGFI:.958, CFI:.985, IFI:.985, TLI:.974, and RMSEA:.052. For the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS), the analysis yielded the following fit indices: CMIN/DF(χ²/df): 2.819, GFI:.943, AGFI:.915, CFI:.958, IFI:.958, TLI:.945, and RMSEA:.062. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients [57,58] (Table 2) and model fit indices were considered to fall within the ranges specified in the literature, indicating that the obtained values demonstrated excellent fit parameters and all scales were validated with the collected data [59–62].

Table 2. Confirmatory factor analysis and validity & reliability analyses.

CMIN/DF
(x2/df)
GFI AGFI CFI IFI TLI RMSEA Cronbach’s Alpha (α)
Sport engagement 2.027 .973 .954 .975 .975 .964 .047 .83
Sportive life satisfaction 3.301 .994 .958 .992 .993 .962 .070 .77
Mental well-being 2.285 .981 .958 .985 .985 .974 .052 .91
Psychological well-being 2.819 .943 .915 .958 .958 .945 .062 .86

Result

Correlational analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between sport engagement, sportive life satisfaction, and well-being [45]. Following the guidelines suggested by Norusis [63] correlation coefficients (r) were interpreted as indicating weak (0 < r ≤ 0.3) moderate (0.3 < r ≤ 0.7) or strong (0.7 < r≤+1) relationships. The analysis revealed significant positive correlations between the subdimensions of the Sport Engagement Scale (SES) and the other well-being measures. Specifically, the vigor subdimension of the SES demonstrated moderate correlations with sportive life satisfaction (r = .443), mental well-being (r = .536), and psychological well-being (r = .628). Similarly, the dedication subdimension of the SES showed moderate correlations with sportive life satisfaction (r = .408), mental well-being (r = .443), and psychological well-being (r = .518). These findings indicate that higher levels of sport engagement, as reflected in both vigor and dedication, are associated with greater sportive life satisfaction, mental well-being, and psychological well-being (Table 3).

Table 3. Results of correlation analysis of research variables.

Variables M SD 1 2 3 4 5
Vigor 6.42 .562 –
Dedication 6.14 .798 .644** –
Sportive life satisfaction 5.95 .856 .443** .408** –
Mental well-being 4.18 .575 .536** .443** .535** –
Psychological well-being 6.03 .770 .628** .518** .580** .834** –

**p < 0.01; M: Mean; SD: Standard deviation; 1: vigor, 2: dedication, 3: sportive life satisfaction 4: mental well-being, 5: psychological well-being

In order to assess the predictive power of sport engagement on sportive life satisfaction and well-being, multiple regression analysis was conducted. Prior to the analysis, multicollinearity was assessed using variance inflation factor (VIF) values. All VIF values were below 10 [64], indicating that multicollinearity was not a concern in the present data. The Durbin-Watson statistic was also examined to assess autocorrelation. The obtained value fell within the acceptable range of 1.5 to 2.5 [65], suggesting no significant autocorrelation. As noted by Tabachnick & Fidell [66], regression analysis allows for the prediction of one variable from another. In this case, sport engagement was used as the independent variable to predict the dependent variables: sportive life satisfaction, mental well-being, and psychological well-being. The results of this analysis are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. The impact of sport engagement on sportive life satisfaction, mental well-being and psychological well-being (multiple regression analysis results).

1- First Part
Model B Std. Error Beta (β) t p R=.471
R2=.222
Adj. R2= .219
F(2-470)= 67.010
p=.000
D-W=1.870
VIF=1.710
(Constant) 1.564 .400 - 3.912 .000
Vigor .469 .081 .308 5.796*** .000
Dedication .224 .057 .209 3.928*** .000
Dependent variable: Sportive Life Satisfaction
2- Second Part
(Constant) .633 .254 - 2.488 .013 R=.551
R2=.303
Adj. R2= .300
F(2-470)= 102.295
p=.000
D-W=1.976
VIF=1.710
Vigor .438 .051 .428 8.498*** .000
Dedication .121 .036 .167 3.322** .001
Dependent variable: Mental Well-being
3- Third Part
(Constant) .460 .311 - 1.477 .140 R=.645
R2=.416
Adj. R2= .414
F(2-470)= 167.616
p=.000
D-W=2.065
VIF=1.710
Vigor .689 .063 .503 10.924*** .000
Dedication .187 .044 .193 4.196*** .000
Dependent variable: Psychological Well-being

Beta (β): Standardized coefficients; D-W: Durbin Watson; Variance Inflation Factor;**p < .01; ***p < .001.

The multiple regression model predicting sportive life satisfaction from sport engagement was statistically significant (F(2–470)= 67.010; p < 0.001). The model in the first part of Table 4 explained approximately 22% of the variance in sportive life satisfaction, as indicated by the R² value of.222 (adjusted R² = .219). Examination of the beta coefficients revealed that both subdimensions of sport engagement were significant positive predictors of sportive life satisfaction: Vigor: β = .308 indicated that higher levels of vigor were associated with greater sportive life satisfaction. Dedication: β = .209 suggested that increased focus also contributed to higher levels of sportive life satisfaction. Such findings seem to support the hypotheses H1 and H2, which proposed that both vigor and dedication, as components of sport engagement, would positively predict sportive life satisfaction.

The model predicting mental well-being from sport engagement was statistically significant (F(2–470)= 102.295; p < 0.001). The model in the second part accounted for 30% of the variance in mental well-being, as indicated by the R² value of.303 (adjusted R² = .300). Examination of the beta coefficients showed that both subdimensions of sport engagement were significant positive predictors of mental well-being. Vigor: β = .428 demonstrated that higher levels of vigor were associated with greater mental well-being, while dedication: β = .167 showed that increased dedication also contributed to enhanced mental well-being. These results appear to support hypotheses H3 and H4.

The model presented in the third part of the table produced statistically significant results (F(2–470)= 167.616; p < 0.001). This model explained 41% of the variance in psychological well-being, as evidenced by the R² value of.416 (adjusted R² = .414). Analysis of the beta coefficients revealed that both subdimensions of sport engagement were significant positive predictors of psychological well-being. The first significant positive effect was in the sport engagement subdimension vigor (β = .503), and the second positive effect was in the dedication dimension (β = .193), which provided support for hypotheses H5 and H6. In summary, the regression analyses consistently demonstrated that sport engagement, specifically the vigor and dedication subdimensions, positively predicts sportive life satisfaction, mental well-being, and psychological well-being in athletes.

Discussion

This study provides further evidence for the positive impact of sport engagement on various facets of well-being, including sportive life satisfaction. The observed positive and moderate correlation between sport engagement and sportive life satisfaction aligns with a growing body of literature highlighting the beneficial effects of sport participation on quality of life. The findings of the multiple regression analysis, demonstrating the positive predictive power of both vigor (approaching sport with energy and enthusiasm) and dedication (a strong commitment to their training and performance) on sportive life satisfaction, are consistent with previous research. For instance, Herbert et al. [67] presented evidence for the positive influence of sport participation on quality of life. Likewise, Martin et al. [68] reported high levels of life satisfaction among wheelchair basketball athletes, attributed to their engagement in sport. Zheng et al. [69] found a significant positive effect of sport engagement on life satisfaction in athletes participating in the National Paralympic Games. Wu et al. [70] reported a positive relationship between quality of life and sport participation in young athletes. Gul & Kucukibis [71] concluded that sports high school students, with their higher levels of sport engagement, also experienced greater life satisfaction compared to other students. Beyond the athlete population, research has also linked commitment to physical activity with increased life satisfaction in university students [72]. Zhou et al. [73] demonstrated the indirect positive effects of physical exercise on life satisfaction in Chinese university students. Toros et al. [74] further emphasized this link, stating that individuals committed to regular physical activity report higher life satisfaction than sedentary individuals. These findings are further corroborated by numerous other studies [75,76; 77–80] that have collectively established a robust link between sport and physical activity engagement and enhanced quality of life and life satisfaction. The present study contributes to this body of knowledge by specifically highlighting the role of both vigor and dedication, as components of sport engagement, in promoting sportive life satisfaction among athletes. In this context, when an increase in an individual’s level of engagement with sports is observed, it can be assumed that there may also be an increase in their sportive life satisfaction. Indeed, there can be many sources of motivation for individuals to participate in physical activities. In fact, this motivation may be related to many other psychological indicators. Therefore, it is thought that individuals who participate in physical activity with vigorus and dedicated motivation are also more likely to achieve satisfaction in sports.

The study further strengthens the evidence base for the positive relationship between sport engagement and mental well-being. The multiple regression analysis, which revealed that both vigor and dedication positively predict mental well-being, adds to the understanding of this relationship, which is consistent with Appelqvist-Schmidlechner et al. [81], who reported positive effects of sport participation on the mental well-being of young adult male athletes in Finland. Ochoa Del-Toro et al. [82] further corroborated this finding in a study with the Spanish population, indicating that sport engagement is associated with enhanced mental well-being across different populations. The benefits of sport engagement extend beyond athletes to individuals in various life contexts. For example, Guo and Jiang [83] found that physical activity positively affects the mental health of teachers, who often experience high levels of stress. Al-Johani [84] similarly reported a positive association between physical activity levels and mental well-being among teachers. Further supporting the link between sport engagement and mental well-being, Kim et al. [85] provided evidence that an optimal amount of physical activity (2.5 to 7.5 hours per week) has positive effects on mental health. In a Scottish study, Hamer et al. [86] also concluded that the intensity of participation in sporting activities was positively associated with mental health benefits. Such findings, along with the results of the present study, strongly suggest that sport engagement, involving both vigor and dedication, plays a crucial role in promoting mental well-being. Participation in physical activities may be related to the activation of individual self-control systems. Consistently following sports activities requires discipline. It is important to remember that the individual’s mental health is also a significant factor in all these processes. Considering that mental states such as alertness and focus are important factors in sports engagement, it can be expected that individuals will also be sufficiently healthy mentally. Indeed, it is thought that individuals who show an increase in their level of engagement to sports may also experience an improvement in their mental health at the same time.

The final key finding of this study is the positive and moderate correlation between sport engagement and psychological well-being. The multiple regression analysis further revealed that both vigor and dedication, as components of sport engagement, have positive effects on psychological well-being, which aligns with a substantial body of research highlighting the benefits of physical activity and sport on various aspects of psychological health. D’Aurizio et al. [87] emphasized the importance of physical activity type, intensity, and frequency in protecting and enhancing psycho-physical well-being and cognitive functioning. Rodriguez-Bravo et al. [88] found that physical-sport activities positively influenced the psychological well-being of youth in both Spain and Colombia. Congsheng et al. [89] revealed similar positive effects of sport participation on the mental health of university students in Malaysia. Vella et al. [90] further confirmed the positive relationship between physical activity and mental health in their research. Edwards [91] reported significant improvements in various components of psychological well-being, including mood, life satisfaction, courage, and stress coping, following a 2- to 6-month period of regular physical exercise. The positive association between physical activity and psychological well-being has been consistently reported in the literature [92]. Besides, studies by Pourranjbar et al. [93], Arruza et al. [94], and Donaldson & Ronan [95] have shown that increased sport engagement is linked to higher levels of psychological and behavioral well-being. In summary, the vigor and dedication involved in sport participation can be said to contribute to enhanced psychological health.

As highlighted by Ramazanoglu et al. [96], sport plays a vital role in physical, mental, and social development. Eime et al. [97] systematically reviewed the literature and found that sport participation offers numerous psychological and social advantages for children and adolescents, including increased self-esteem, enhanced social interaction, and reduced depressive symptoms. Miller & Hoffman [98] presented similar findings, underscoring the positive impact of sport on youth development. The inherent enjoyment associated with sport participation, as noted by Joung et al. [99], fosters continued engagement and creates an upward spiral of positive effects, contributing to increased social welfare [32]. The positive effects of exercise activities [100] will translate into increased feelings of satisfaction among individuals over time; because today’s generations hate boredom and love when their parents initiate activities for them [101]. This highlights the potential for sport to promote individual well-being and contribute to broader societal benefits. In various social and cultural structures, factors such as socio-economic level, state and government policies, geographical conditions, traditions, etc. can have an impact on individuals’ participation in physical activities. Indeed, in Türkiye, where the research was conducted, there are cultural, social, and political factors that influence individuals’ commitment to sports. In particular, the state’s reward system for successful athletes and the support mechanisms that will enable successful athletes to work at various levels of sports (coaches, educators, managers, etc.) in the future are in a position to encourage engagement to sports. Sporting activities, which have been disrupted in recent years due to the pandemic and natural disasters, have quickly entered a recovery phase as a result of the policies implemented. In this context, administrative processes have been successfully implemented to ensure the sustainability of all sporting activities. Therefore, the authorities have not overlooked the importance of utilizing the positive effects of participation in physical activities on individuals as a means to eliminate the negative experiences.

Conclusions

The present study reinforces these notions by demonstrating the positive effects of sport engagement on sportive life satisfaction, mental well-being, and psychological well-being in athletes. These findings are particularly significant considering the detrimental consequences of low life satisfaction and poor mental health, which can include loneliness, stress, depression, and even suicidal tendencies [102–104]. Within the scope of the research, data were collected from athletes operating in various branches such as football, rugby, wrestling, kickboxing, archery, table tennis, taekwondo, volleyball, swimming, cycling, handball and karate. The diversity of sports disciplines is important in terms of reflecting the psychometric characteristics of different groups in the research. Likewise, the fact that the sample group is close to each other in terms of gender contributes to the research. It is thought that the fact that each sport branch has its own unique participant profile increases the possibility of generalizing the research results. The type of physical activity in which individuals with culturally distinct characteristics participate provides an opportunity to observe them psychologically. This study, which includes participants from diverse backgrounds such as different cultures, different sports disciplines, and different genders, is expected to provide insights across a wide range of perspectives based on its findings. Herefore, this study underscores the importance of encouraging and supporting sport participation across all age groups for improved well-being and a better quality of life. Furthermore, this research contributes to the existing literature both theoretically and practically. Existing literature highlights the effects of individuals participating in physical activity on general health indicators [2–5,6,7]. However, participation in physical activities and individuals’ commitment to sports contain some differences. This study demonstrates that individuals who choose a physically active lifestyle are both physically and psychologically fit by placing physical activities at the center of their lives. Therefore, increasing social welfare will be possible with physically and mentally resilient individuals. The contribution of the research results to the literature is important in that the relationship observed in the current health indicators of individuals committed to sports opens the door to multidisciplinary inferences. Theoretically, this study provides evidence that commitment to sporting activities positively influences both sport life satisfaction and mental well-being. This finding expands our understanding of the psychological benefits associated with sports participation. Practically, the positive correlation between sport engagement and well-being suggests that fostering a sense of dedication to sports may be a valuable strategy for enhancing individuals’ mental health and quality of life.

Limitations

While this study provides valuable insights into positive effects of sport engagement on life satisfaction, mental and psychological well-being, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. First, the study sample consisted solely of Turkish athletes, so the generalizability of the findings to athletes from other cultural backgrounds is limited. On the other hand, the fact that participants were included in the study using a convenience sampling method may limit generalizability due to the lack of randomization. In addition, the earthquake disaster in Turkey caused trauma on society. Due to the earthquake, sporting activities have been suspended for a period of time and athletes’ routine physical activities have been disrupted. Therefore, delays in the data collection process due to the athletes being expected to return to their routine sports activities and move away from the negative effects of the earthquake can be considered among the limitations of the research. Secondly, our participants represented a limited number of sports and disciplines. Given the vast array of sports with their diverse demands and characteristics (seewikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sports), further studies with athletes from a wider range of disciplines can contribute to the relevant literature. Finally, we relied on self-reported measures using Likert-type scales, which are subject to potential biases inherent in self-report data. Future research utilizing experimental or longitudinal designs could be more valuable in establishing the directionality of the observed relationships.

Directions for further research and practical recommendations

The findings of this study have implications for various stakeholders, including athletes, families, coaches, educators, and policymakers. Future research could explore the specific mechanisms through which sport commitment enhances well-being, and investigate potential moderating factors such as age, gender, and type of sport.

Practically, this research underscores the importance of promoting sports participation and sports commitment. Policymakers could consider initiatives that increase access to sports facilities and programs. It may be recommended that bureaucrats and sports administrators discuss the possibility of enabling individuals to pursue both academic and athletic careers simultaneously. Additionally, for a society composed of physically and mentally healthy individuals, integrating physical activities into all levels of the education system can be proposed to the relevant authorities. On the other hand, it may be advisable to support initiatives undertaken through a public-private partnership model in rural and socio-economically disadvantaged regions with limited access to sports facilities and practices. Coaches and educators can play a crucial role by fostering a supportive and motivating environment that encourages athletes’ dedication to their chosen sports. During the training of coaches, educators and managers, it can be suggested that in addition to physical capacity development programs, it may be useful to implement training programs such as sports psychology, sports sociology, sports philosophy, sports pedagogy, etc. Parents can also contribute by supporting their children’s involvement in sports and promoting a positive attitude towards physical activity. In this context, it may be recommended that relevant institutions organize parent orientation training at regular periods to raise awareness among families. By encouraging widespread engagement in sports, society can reap the benefits of a physically and mentally healthier population. Increased sports participation can foster social interaction, enhance life satisfaction, and contribute to the development of productive and well-adjusted individuals. Future research should include more diverse samples to examine potential cross-cultural differences.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Data.

(XLSX)

pone.0340069.s001.xlsx (84.1KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Tay Z, Chen B, Kui KY, Padmapriya N, Chong MF-F, Müller AM, et al. Results from the Singapore 2022 report card on physical activity for children and adolescents. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2023;21(1):20–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2022.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li GS-F, Lu FJH, Wang AH-H. Exploring the Relationships of Physical Activity, Emotional Intelligence and Health in Taiwan College Students. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness. 2009;7(1):55–63. doi: 10.1016/s1728-869x(09)60008-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ponciano Núñez PD, Portela-Pino I, Martínez-Patiño MJ. Understanding the Characteristics of Community Youth Sports Programs Interventions: A Systematic Review and Recommendations. Sage Open. 2023;13(2). doi: 10.1177/21582440231179206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kocak F, Tuncel F, Tuncel S. Determining the dimensions of sustainability in sport. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2013;11(2):113–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organisation. Pacific physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines for everyone. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789290619901 2023.
  • 6.Annesi JJ. Psychological improvement is associated with exercise session attendance over 10 weeks in formerly sedentary adults. European Journal of Sport Science. 2004;4(2):1–10. doi: 10.1080/17461390400074202 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.An H-Y, Chen W, Wang C-W, Yang H-F, Huang W-T, Fan S-Y. The Relationships between Physical Activity and Life Satisfaction and Happiness among Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4817. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brown KA, Patel DR, Darmawan D. Participation in sports in relation to adolescent growth and development. Transl Pediatr. 2017;6(3):150–9. doi: 10.21037/tp.2017.04.03 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Golshani S, Najafpour A, Hashemian SS, Goudarzi N, Shahmari F, Golshani S, et al. When Much Is Too Much-Compared to Light Exercisers, Heavy Exercisers Report More Mental Health Issues and Stress, but Less Sleep Complaints. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(10):1289. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Manyanga T, Makaza D, Munambah NE, Mahachi C, Mavingire C, Mlalazi TF, et al. Indicators of physical activity and nutritional status among children and adolescents in Zimbabwe: Findings from three global matrix initiatives. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness. 2023;21(2):202–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2023.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Solberg PA, Kvamme NH, Raastad T, Ommundsen Y, Tomten SE, Halvari H, et al. Effects of different types of exercise on muscle mass, strength, function and well‐being in elderly. European Journal of Sport Science. 2011;13(1):112–25. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2011.617391 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Eather N, Wade L, Pankowiak A, Eime R. The impact of sports participation on mental health and social outcomes in adults: a systematic review and the “Mental Health through Sport” conceptual model. Syst Rev. 2023;12(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02264-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shaffer HJ, Hall MN, Vander Bilt J. “Computer addiction”: a critical consideration. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000;70(2):162–8. doi: 10.1037/h0087741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mercan M. Organizational commitment, organizational alienation and organizational citizenship in teachers. Afyon Kocatepe University. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-romá V, Bakker AB. The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2002;3(1):71–92. doi: 10.1023/a:1015630930326 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lonsdale C, Hodge K, Jackson SA. Athlete Engagement Questionnaire. PsycTESTS Dataset. American Psychological Association (APA). 2007. doi: 10.1037/t50268-000 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guillen F, Martinez Alvarado JR. The sport engagement scale: An adaptation of the utrecht work engagement scale (UWES) for the sports environment. Universitas Psychologica. 2014;13(3):975–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dagli A, Baysal N. Adaptation of the satisfaction with life scale into Turkish: the study of validity and reliability. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences. 2016;15(59):1250–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boehm JK, Winning A, Segerstrom S, Kubzansky LD. Variability Modifies Life Satisfaction’s Association With Mortality Risk in Older Adults. Psychol Sci. 2015;26(7):1063–70. doi: 10.1177/0956797615581491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fleming K. Examining Life Satisfaction and Self-Compassion Among Students Attending a Historically Black College and University in the U.S. JERP. 2021;2(2):12–20. doi: 10.53016/jerp.v2i2.14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ozer M, Karabulut OO. Life satisfaction in the elderly. Geriatrics. 2003;6(2):72–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Diener E. Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being. J Happiness Stud. 2006;7(4):397–404. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9000-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hammaji RAM, Ay M. The investigation of burnout, job satisfaction and life satisfaction among Iraqi accounting employees: Kirkuk sample. Journal of Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute. 2020;43:219–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huebner ES, Suldo SM, Gilman R. Life Satisfaction. In: Bear GG, Minke KM. Children’s Needs III: Development, Prevention, and Intervention. National Association of School Psychologists. 2006. 357–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Song X. Research on factors related to exercise behavior. Journal of Chengdu Institute of Physical Education. 2001;27(2):49–52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9154.2001.02.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Somoglu MB, Cihan H. Sportive life satisfaction scale: adaptation study to Turkish culture. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science. 2022;5(1):531–47. doi: 10.38021/asbid.1194098 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.World Health Organisation. Mental well-being. https://www.who.int/health-topics/mental-healthtab_1 2024.
  • 28.Sawyer MG, Arney FM, Baghurst PA, Clark JJ, Graetz BW, Kosky RJ, et al. The mental health of young people in Australia: key findings from the child and adolescent component of the national survey of mental health and well-being. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001;35(6):806–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00964.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tamminen N, Reinikainen J, Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, Borodulin K, Mäki-Opas T, Solin P. Associations of physical activity with positive mental health: A population-based study. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2020;18:100319. doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100319 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ryff CD, Boylan JM, Kirsch JA. Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-Being. Measuring Well-Being. Oxford University PressNew York. 2021. 92–135. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rato Barrio M, Ley C, Schomöller A, Dumon D. Mental Well-Being or Ill-Being through Coaching in Adult Grassroots Sport: A Systematic Mapping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12):6543. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Benítez-Sillero J de D, Martínez-Aranda LM, Sanz-Matesanz M, Domínguez-Escribano M. Determining Factors of Psychological Performance and Differences among Age Categories in Youth Football Players. Sustainability. 2021;13(14):7713. doi: 10.3390/su13147713 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;57(6):1069–81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ryff CD, Keyes CL. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(4):719–27. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oliveira-Brochado A, Quelhas Brito P, Oliveira-Brochado F. Correlates of adults’ participation in sport and frequency of sport. Science & Sports. 2017;32(6):355–63. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2017.03.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Santos AC, Willumsen J, Meheus F, Ilbawi A, Bull FC. The cost of inaction on physical inactivity to public health-care systems: a population-attributable fraction analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(1):e32–9. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00464-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wigger U. Exercise and youth: Physical activity,sport involvement, and development. European Journal of Sport Science. 2001;1(3):1–8. doi: 10.1080/17461390100071305 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peralta M, Martins J, Gómez Chávez F, Cortés Almanzar P, Marques A. Self-rated wellbeing and physical activity associations in European older adults. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018;18(7):1038–44. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1469672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Prémusz V, Makai A, Ács P, Derkács E, Laczkó T. Association of Outdoor Physical Activity and Sports with Life Satisfaction among Women of Reproductive Age According to a European Representative Sample-A Longitudinal Analysis. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023;13(9):1859–79. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13090135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Park J-A, Park M-H, Shin J-H, Li B, Rolfe DT, Yoo J-Y, et al. Effect of sports participation on Internet addiction mediated by self-control: A case of Korean adolescents. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 2016;37(3):164–9. doi: 10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sahlin KB, Lexell J. Impact of Organized Sports on Activity, Participation, and Quality of Life in People With Neurologic Disabilities. PM R. 2015;7(10):1081–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ocete Calvo C, Pérez-Calzado E, Berástegui A, Franco Álvarez E. The role of motivation in shaping social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in physical-sports activity contexts. Eur J Sport Sci. 2024;24(8):1152–61. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vavassori R, Moreno MP, Ureña Espa A. The Perception of Volleyball Student-Athletes: Evaluation of Well-Being, Sport Workload, Players’ Response, and Academic Demands. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(11):1538. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Karasar N. Scientific research method. Turkey: Nobel. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gurbuz S, Sahin F. Research Methods in Social Sciences. Turkey: Seckin. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bicer B. A research on the relationship between ethical climate, organizational learning and innovative behavior. Osmaniye University. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kayhan R, Bardakcı S, Caz C. Adaptation of the sport engagement scale to Turkish. Journal of The Human and Social Sciences Research. 2020;9(3):2905–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mangan C. Interpersonal communication in college athletics. The University of Western Illinois. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Keldal G. Turkish version of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale: A validity and reliability study. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being. 2015;3(1):103–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, et al. New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Soc Indic Res. 2009;97(2):143–56. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Telef BB. The adaptation of psychological well-being into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. 2013;28(3):374–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.George D, Mallery M. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update. 10 ed. Boston: Pearson. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Uysal I, Kiliç A. Normal Dağılım İkilemi. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International. 2022;12(1):220–48. doi: 10.18039/ajesi.962653 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Uzunsakal E, Yıldız D. A comparison of reliability tests in field researches and an application on agricultural data. Journal of Applied Social Sciences. 2018;2(1):14–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kalaycı S. SPSS Applied Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Turkey: Dynamic Academy. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychometrika. 1984;49(2):155–73. doi: 10.1007/bf02294170 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2008;6:53–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Plichta SB, Kelvin EA. Munro’s statistical methods for health care research. 6th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. London: Pearson Education Limited. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Norusis MJ. SPSS Statistics 17.0 Guide to Data Analysis. 2008. Chicago: Published by prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mertler CA, Vannatta Reinhart R. Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. Sixth ed. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zakerian SA, Subramaniam ID. The relationship between psychosocial work factors, work stress and computer-related musculoskeletal discomforts among computer users in Malaysia. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(4):425–34. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Use of Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Herbert C, Meixner F, Wiebking C, Gilg V. Regular Physical Activity, Short-Term Exercise, Mental Health, and Well-Being Among University Students: The Results of an Online and a Laboratory Study. Front Psychol. 2020;11:509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Martin JJ, Byrd B, Watts ML, Dent M. Gritty, Hardy, and Resilient: Predictors of Sport Engagement and Life Satisfaction in Wheelchair Basketball Players. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. 2015;9(4):345–59. doi: 10.1123/jcsp.2015-0015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zheng L, Yao J, Zhou W, Liu D. The effect of physical activity on the quality of life of athletes with disabilities and the mediating role of life satisfaction and physical self-esteem. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023;240:104044. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wu Q, Tan Y, Sun G, Ding Q. The relationship between self-concept clarity, athletic identity, athlete engagement and the mediating roles of quality of life and smartphone use in Chinese youth athletes. Heliyon. 2023;9(10):e21197. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gül M, Küçükibiş HF. Research on the Sport High School and Other High School Students’ Attitude Towards Physical Activities and Levels of Satisfaction with Life. IJPE. 2018;14(6):132–7. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.179.10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Deng J, Liu Y, Chen R, Wang Y. The Relationship between Physical Activity and Life Satisfaction among University Students in China: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Resilience. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023;13(11):889. doi: 10.3390/bs13110889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhou G-Y, Yang B, Li H, Feng Q-S, Chen W-Y. The influence of physical exercise on college students’ life satisfaction: The chain mediating role of self-control and psychological distress. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1071615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Toros T, Ogras EB, Toy AB, Kulak A, Esen HT, Ozer SC, et al. The Impact of Regular Exercise on Life Satisfaction, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in Older Adults. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023;13(9):714. doi: 10.3390/bs13090714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Strachan SM, Brawley LR, Spink K, Glazebrook K. Older adults’ physically-active identity: Relationships between social cognitions, physical activity and satisfaction with life. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2010;11(2):114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.09.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Park SG, Moon H, Jin HM. Changes in physical strength, activity of daily living, life satisfaction, and self‐esteem after performing the physical and psychological exercise program in older adults with hemiplegia. The FASEB Journal. 2016;30(S1). doi: 10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.1240.8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yen H-Y, Lin L-J. Quality of life in older adults: Benefits from the productive engagement in physical activity. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2018;16(2):49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Balkar OE. The mediating role of life satisfaction in the relationship between attitude towards sports and individual innovativeness. Recreation and Tourism Research. 2021;9:165–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Silva SCB, Tebar WR, Ferrari G, Lemes ÍR, Aguilar BAS, Teixeira MS, et al. Sports practice, walking and biking are positively related to quality of life in adults: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Transport & Health. 2023;33:101701. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2023.101701 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kan B, Xie Y. Impact of sports participation on life satisfaction among internal migrants in China: The chain mediating effect of social interaction and self-efficacy. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024;243:104139. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, Vaara J, Häkkinen A, Vasankari T, Mäkinen J, Mäntysaari M, et al. Relationships Between Youth Sports Participation and Mental Health in Young Adulthood Among Finnish Males. Am J Health Promot. 2017;32(7):1502–9. doi: 10.1177/0890117117746336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ochoa Del-Toro AG, Mitchell-Bennett LA, Machiorlatti M, Robledo CA, Davé AC, Lozoya RN, et al. Community Exercise Program Participation and Mental Well-Being in the U.S. Texas-Mexico Border Region. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(22):2946. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Guo M, Jiang S. Structural modeling of EFL/ESL teachers’ physical activity, mental health, psychological well-being, and self-efficacy. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01383-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 84.Al-Johani RM. Effect of physical activity on mental wellbeing among teachers of secondary school in Almadina city, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(11):4264–71. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_906_21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kim YS, Park YS, Allegrante JP, Marks R, Ok H, Ok Cho K, et al. Relationship between physical activity and general mental health. Prev Med. 2012;55(5):458–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A. Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mental health: the Scottish Health Survey. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(14):1111–4. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.046243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.D’Aurizio G, Festucci F, Di Pompeo I, Tempesta D, Curcio G. Effects of Physical Activity on Cognitive Functioning: The Role of Cognitive Reserve and Active Aging. Brain Sci. 2023;13(11):1581. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Rodríguez-Bravo AE, De-Juanas Á, García-Castilla FJ. Effect of Physical-Sports Leisure Activities on Young People’s Psychological Wellbeing. Front Psychol. 2020;11:543951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.543951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Congsheng L, Kayani S, Khalid A. An empirical study of physical activity and sports affecting mental health of university students. Front Psychol. 2022;13:917503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Vella SA, Aidman E, Teychenne M, Smith JJ, Swann C, Rosenbaum S, et al. Optimising the effects of physical activity on mental health and wellbeing: A joint consensus statement from Sports Medicine Australia and the Australian Psychological Society. J Sci Med Sport. 2023;26(2):132–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2023.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Edwards S. Physical Exercise and Psychological Well-Being. South African Journal of Psychology. 2006;36(2):357–73. doi: 10.1177/008124630603600209 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Netz Y, Wu M-J, Becker BJ, Tenenbaum G. Physical activity and psychological well-being in advanced age: a meta-analysis of intervention studies. Psychol Aging. 2005;20(2):272–84. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pourranjbar M, Khodadadi MR, Farid-Fathi M. Correlation between sport participation, psychological well-being and physical complaints among students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2019;8(1):64–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Arruza JA, Arribas S, Gil DML, Irazusta S, Romero S, Cecchini JA. The impact of duration in sport and physical activity on the psychological well-being. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. 2008; 8(30): 171–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Donaldson SJ, Ronan KR. The effects of sports participation on young adolescents’ emotional well-being. Adolescence. 2006;41(162):369–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ramazanoglu F, Karahüseyinoglu MF, Demirel ET, Ramazanoglu MO, Altungül O. Evaluation of social dimensions of sport. Journal of Eastern Anatolian Studies. 2005;3(3):153–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:98. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Miller KE, Hoffman JH. Mental Well-Being and Sport-Related Identities in College Students. Sociol Sport J. 2009;26(2):335–56. doi: 10.1123/ssj.26.2.335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Joung K, Jeon W, Kwon G. Relationship between perceived enjoyment, exercise commitment and behavioral intention among adolescents participating in “School Sport Club”. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;10:1277494. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1277494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Rittsteiger L, Hinz T, Oriwol D, Wäsche H, Santos-Hövener C, Woll A. Sports participation of children and adolescents in Germany: disentangling the influence of parental socioeconomic status. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1446. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11284-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Piepiora PA, Bagińska J, Piepiora ZN. Perspective on solving the problem of declining interest in physical activity in Poland. Front Sports Act Living. 2024;6:1416154. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1416154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Valois RF, Zullig KJ, Huebner ES, Drane JW. Life satisfaction and suicide among high school adolescents. Quality-of-life Research on Children and Adolescents. 2004;:81–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Sinniah D, Maniam T, Kannan K, Stanistreet D, et al. General health mediates the relationship between loneliness, life satisfaction and depression. A study with Malaysian medical students. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(2):161–6. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0140-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Shi M, Wang X, Bian Y, Wang L. The mediating role of resilience in the relationship between stress and life satisfaction among Chinese medical students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:16. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0297-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mustafa KOC

4 Nov 2025

Dear Dr. ÖZSARI,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 19 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mustafa Can KOC, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows:

“All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.”

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

3. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include author M.Çağrı ÇETİN.

4. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 1 and 4 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

5. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Author(s)

The reviewer has completed the report.

Please make the corrections carefully.

Kind regards

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: INTRODUCTION

Strengths

The introduction comprehensively and systematically addresses the relationships between physical activity, participation in sports, life satisfaction, and well-being. The logical progression from general health benefits to psychological dimensions is strong and supported by current sources. The author successfully integrates WHO data and theoretical frameworks to emphasize the global importance of the topic. Key concepts such as participation, life satisfaction, and psychological well-being are clearly defined. Overall, the text presents an academic style, extensive knowledge of the literature, and a strong theoretical foundation that supports the study's objectives.

Weaknesses

The introduction section, despite being comprehensive, is overly detailed in places, which detracts from the clarity of the main theme. In particular, the sections on the general health benefits of physical activity are lengthy, delaying the transition to the study's main focus: “the effects of sports participation on life satisfaction and psychological well-being.” Although the conceptual explanations are presented sequentially, the transitions between sections could be made more fluid. Furthermore, the original aspect of the research and the gap in the literature it aims to fill are not sufficiently clear, which weakens the scientific contribution of the study. The purpose of the research is conveyed in general terms in the last paragraph, but the rationale, importance, and expected contributions of this purpose should be emphasized more clearly. In terms of language, some expressions appear unnecessarily emotional or exaggerated, which partially diminishes the academic impartiality of the text. A simpler, more focused, and coherent narrative should be preferred.

METHOD

Strengths

The methodology section is clear, systematic, and structured in a manner appropriate to the research objectives. The correlational survey model used is an appropriate choice for examining the relationships between variables. The high number of participants (n=473) and the balanced gender distribution increase the representativeness of the study. The detailed presentation of the validity and reliability values of the measurement tools constitutes a strong methodological aspect. The high Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each scale demonstrate the reliability of the data quality. Furthermore, the detailed reporting of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results supports the structural validity of the scales. The clear indication of ethics committee approval and the principle of voluntary participation demonstrates that the research was conducted in accordance with ethical standards.

Weaknesses

Although the methodology section is generally adequate, it is open to improvement in some respects. First, the rationale for choosing the relational screening model and how this model aligns with the research hypotheses should be explained more clearly. The use of convenience sampling in sample selection may limit representativeness; the possible effects of this situation have not been discussed. The possible effects of the earthquake conditions experienced during the data collection process on the research process or participant profile have also not been evaluated. In the scales section, the cultural adaptation processes and validation methods of the measurement tools could be explained in more detail. In the statistical analysis section, it is not specified which variables were included in the multiple regression and how the model assumptions were tested. Furthermore, adding a general flow chart or systematic summary table of the research analysis process at the end of the methods section would enhance the readability and methodological transparency of the section.

RESULTS

Additionally, it would be more appropriate to include Table 1 and Table 2 in the methods section of the findings. (Table 1 in the research group and Table 2 in the section explaining the measurement tools)

It can be seen that the table descriptions are above the table. It is recommended that the descriptions be placed below the table.

DISCUSSION

Strengths

The discussion section is quite successful in integrating the research findings with the existing literature. The findings have been systematically compared with previous studies, and similarities have been strongly emphasized. The author has addressed the relationships between sports participation and life satisfaction, mental and psychological well-being from a multidimensional perspective; by discussing the separate effects of the sub-dimensions of “vigor” and “dedication,” he has made an original contribution to the literature. The discussion has produced results at both the theoretical and practical levels, offering applicable recommendations, particularly for sports policies, coaches, and educators. The conclusion and recommendations sections clearly outline the ways in which the research could contribute to social welfare and mental health in general. The chapter demonstrates a strong academic standard in terms of academic language, logical coherence, and source integration.

Weaknesses

Although the discussion section is comprehensive, it needs improvement in some respects. First, the discussion of the findings largely repeats previous studies, and the original contribution of the research should be emphasized more clearly. The text places excessive emphasis on causal inferences in places, but these results are limited to a correlational model; this should be clearly stated in the discussion. The contextual interpretation of the findings (e.g., sports culture in Turkey or post-pandemic sports participation dynamics) is lacking. Furthermore, the impact mechanisms of the “vigor” and “dedication” sub-dimensions could be discussed in a more analytical manner. The limitations section is brief; the data collection method, sample diversity, and the possible effects of cultural factors on the results should be addressed in greater depth. Although the recommendations presented in the final section are valuable, some are of a general nature; adding more concrete strategies for policymakers and practitioners would strengthen the text.

Reviewer #2: Technically well-designed data were collected accurately, and the results obtained from the data were generally found to support the main idea presented in the article. Moreover, this study adequately possesses the necessary scientific characteristics. It is observed that this is a review study and that the data collected were obtained through valid and reliable scales.

The statistical analyses conducted in the study are up-to-date. Primarily, descriptive statistics were used, followed by inferential statistics such as correlation and regression analyses. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analysis was employed to test the model, and model fit indices were reported. From this perspective, the statistical analyses performed are sufficient to obtain accurate and meaningful results.

The authors discussed all the data obtained in the article and presented their hypotheses one by one. Additionally, the collected data and results are adequate to clearly reveal the hypotheses. All essential sections required by the relevant journal were included in the article, and the necessary formatting guidelines were followed.

Finally, the writing language of the article is clear, well-organized, and the results are explained in a simple and understandable manner.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Dr. Kubilay OCAL

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures 

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation. 

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Referee Report.pdf

pone.0340069.s002.pdf (105.1KB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2026 Jan 2;21(1):e0340069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340069.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


5 Dec 2025

Dear Referee,

Thank you for your meticulous review.

We have made the corrections and submitted it as a file.

Regards

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewer.docx

pone.0340069.s004.docx (35.6KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Mustafa KOC

16 Dec 2025

The Impact of Sport Engagement on Life Satisfaction, Mental and Psychological Well-Being Among Athletes

PONE-D-25-54474R1

Dear Dr. Sari,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mustafa Can KOC, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Mustafa KOC

PONE-D-25-54474R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. ÖZSARI,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Assoc.Prof. Mustafa Can KOC

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0340069.s001.xlsx (84.1KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Referee Report.pdf

    pone.0340069.s002.pdf (105.1KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewer.docx

    pone.0340069.s004.docx (35.6KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES