Table 9.
Average performance metrics of the cutting edge approaches for the thermal image in detecting DG subjects
| Algorithms | Performance metrics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score | Computational cost (sec/image) | |
| TransUNet | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.46 |
| Swin-UNETR | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.752 | 0.782 | 0.50 |
| MedT (Gated Axial Transformer) | 0.872 | 0.87 | 0.767 | 0.77 | 0.47 |
| DE-ResUNet | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.775 | 0.57 |
| Hybrid CNN-ViT (ResNet-ViT) | 0.89 | 0.841 | 0.85 | 0.894 | 0.49 |
| ViT-Caps | 0.975 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.42 |
| Proposed Model | 0.987 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.952 | 0.37 |