Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 7;12:1. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-01208-4

Table 1.

Similarity between LFP-based and imaging-based methods and clinical programming and difference from random selection

Selection method vs. CP at IP Selection method at IP vs. CP at cFU
Mean similarity Bootstrap similarity vs. RS (p value) Mean similarity Bootstrap similarity vs. RS (p value)
Broad-Bipolar 0.75 0.2 0.75 0.34
Narrow-Bipolar 0.9 <0.001 0.93 <0.001
Segment-Bipolar 0.86 0.001 0.87 0.02
Imaging-based 0.9 0.006 0.83 0.43
RS 0.7 - 0.67 -

Left columns: mean similarity values of each selection method with clinical programming (CP) at initial programming (IP) and differences between the bootstrap similarity and the random selection (RS). Right columns: mean similarity values of each selection method performed at IP with CP at the last clinical follow-up (cFU), and differences between the bootstrap similarity and RS. Significant values (p < 0.05) are displayed in bold.