Table 1.
Similarity between LFP-based and imaging-based methods and clinical programming and difference from random selection
| Selection method vs. CP at IP | Selection method at IP vs. CP at cFU | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean similarity | Bootstrap similarity vs. RS (p value) | Mean similarity | Bootstrap similarity vs. RS (p value) | |
| Broad-Bipolar | 0.75 | 0.2 | 0.75 | 0.34 |
| Narrow-Bipolar | 0.9 | <0.001 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
| Segment-Bipolar | 0.86 | 0.001 | 0.87 | 0.02 |
| Imaging-based | 0.9 | 0.006 | 0.83 | 0.43 |
| RS | 0.7 | - | 0.67 | - |
Left columns: mean similarity values of each selection method with clinical programming (CP) at initial programming (IP) and differences between the bootstrap similarity and the random selection (RS). Right columns: mean similarity values of each selection method performed at IP with CP at the last clinical follow-up (cFU), and differences between the bootstrap similarity and RS. Significant values (p < 0.05) are displayed in bold.