Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 18;44(1):97–105. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01853-y

Table 3.

Radiologist group performance

References Dataset Sample size (# lesions) Supplementary information Operator Tests
HCC non-HCC Group Years experience Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy NPV PPV
[20] Internal 50 50 Radiologist-1 6 0.730 0.950
Radiologist-2 12 0.890 0.960
[21] Internal 63 57 Age, gender, spatial morphology Radiologist-1 16 0.937 0.719 0.833
Radiologist-2 21 0.905 0.912 0.908
[22] Internal 50 12 Radiologist-1 7 0.920 0.900
Radiologist-2 8 0.500 0.960
[23] Internal 218 167 Radiologist-1 8–10 0.722 0.927 0.811 0.71
Radiologist-2 8–10 0.778 0.927 0.842 0.76
Radiologist-3 8–10 0.759 0.854 0.800 0.72
External 264 292 Radiologist-1 8–10 0.761 0.722 0.744 0.70
Radiologist-2 8–10 0.848 0.778 0.817 0.80
Radiologist-3 8–10 0.826 0.806 0.817 0.72
[24] Internal 252 632 age, gender, history, bloods Radiologist-1 5 0.544 0.785 0.716
Radiologist-2  > 10 0.639 0.884 0.814
External 140 452 Radiologist-1 5 0.564 0.770 0.721
Radiologist-2  > 10 0.757 0.819 0.804
[25] External 64 1740 age, gender, pertinent medical history Radiologist-1 5–10 0.412 0.942
Radiologist-2 5–10 0.457 1.000
Radiologist-3 5–10 0.571 1.000
Radiologist-4 10–20 0.686 0.999
Radiologist-5 10–20 0.706 0.982
Radiologist-6 10–20 0.829 0.996
[26] Internal Not specified (random 25% of total FLL) Not specified (random 25% of total FLL) Radiologist-1 3 0.522 0.908
Radiologist-2 8 0.826 0.947