Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 18;44(1):97–105. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01853-y

Table 4.

Radiologist with AI assistance performance

Author(s) Dataset Sample size Operator Tests
HCC non-HCC Group Years experience Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy NPV PPV
[23] Internal test 1 54 41 Radiologist-1 + AI 8–10 0.927 0.815 0.863 0.936 0.792
Radiologist-2 + AI 8–10 0.927 0.852 0.884 0.939 0.826
Radiologist-3 + AI 8–10 0.854 0.889 0.874 0.889 0.854
External test 1 46 36 Radiologist-1 + AI 8–10 0.750 0.826 0.793 0.809 0.771
Radiologist-2 + AI 8–10 0.833 0.913 0.878 0.875 0.882
Radiologist-3 + AI 8–10 0.889 0.891 0.890 0.911 0.865
Internal test 2 26 16 Radiologist-1 + AI 8–10 0.731 0.938 0.810 0.682 0.950
Radiologist-2 + AI 8–10 0.808 0.938 0.857 0.750 0.955
Radiologist-3 + AI 8–10 0.731 0.938 0.810 0.682 0.950
External test 2 23 27 Radiologist-1 + AI 8–10 0.826 0.778 0.800 0.840 0.760
Radiologist-2 + AI 8–10 0.913 0.593 0.740 0.889 0.656
Radiologist-3 + AI 8–10 0.913 0.926 0.920 0.926 0.913
[24] Internal 252 632 Radiologist-1 + AI 5 0.623 0.859 0.794
Radiologist-2 + AI  > 10 0.885 0.888 0.887
External 140 452 Radiologist-1 + AI 5 0.693 0.892 0.845
Radiologist-2 + AI  > 10 0.821 0.914 0.892
[25] External test 1 64 1161 Radiologist-1 + AI 5–10 0.903 0.988 0.800
Radiologist-2 + AI 5–10 0.806 0.997 0.926
Radiologist-3 + AI 5–10 0.710 0.992 0.815
Radiologist-4 + AI 10–20 0.871 0.997 0.931
Radiologist-5 + AI 10–20 0.871 0.990 0.818
Radiologist-6 + AI 10–20 0.833 0.997 0.926