Table 5.
Effect of boron and zinc on nutrient uptake of sugarcane and ratoon cane.
| Treatments | N uptake (kg ha− 1) | P2O5 uptake (kg ha− 1) | K2O uptake (kg ha− 1) | B uptake (g ha− 1) | Zn uptake (g ha− 1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cane | Ratoon | Cane | Ratoon | Cane | Ratoon | Cane | Ratoon | Cane | Ratoon | |
| Boron | ||||||||||
| B @ 0 kg ha⁻¹ | 149c | 136 c | 65.59a | 60.47 c | 207c | 168 b | 558d | 418 c | 609b | 509a |
| B @ 1 kg ha⁻¹ | 159b | 144 b | 71.04a | 64.30 bc | 218bc | 179 ab | 605c | 455 b | 657a | 525a |
| B @ 2 kg ha⁻¹ | 172a | 147 ab | 71.38a | 66.21 ab | 231ab | 186 a | 655b | 470 ab | 685a | 525a |
| B @ 3 kg ha⁻¹ | 179a | 152 a | 70.75a | 68.64 a | 241a | 191 a | 699a | 481 a | 686a | 526a |
| S.Em. ± | 3.32 | 2.42 | 1.920 | 1.431 | 4.55 | 4.43 | 10.09 | 8.94 | 14.69 | 10.92 |
| Zinc | ||||||||||
| Zn @0 kg ha⁻¹ | 148d | 133 c | 65.25c | 63.23a | 203d | 162 c | 579c | 429 b | 520d | 458 c |
| Zn @5 kg ha⁻¹ | 160c | 143 b | 67.90bc | 65.35a | 217c | 177 b | 607c | 458 a | 620c | 509 b |
| Zn @7.5 kg ha⁻¹ | 170b | 149 ab | 71.65ab | 64.75a | 231b | 187 ab | 650b | 464 a | 698b | 539 b |
| Zn @10 kg ha⁻¹ | 181a | 154 a | 73.94a | 66.29a | 246a | 198 a | 680a | 473 a | 799a | 579 a |
| S.Em. ± | 3.32 | 2.45 | 1.945 | 1.418 | 4.53 | 4.42 | 10.15 | 9.08 | 15.27 | 10.93 |
| Interaction | 0.884 (NS) | 0.748 (NS) | 0.353 (NS) | 0.622 (NS) | 0.372 (NS) | 0.961 (NS) | 0.981 (NS) | 0.418 (NS) | 0.785 (NS) | 0.440 (NS) |
| CV% | 12.07 | 10.10 | 16.81 | 13.49 | 12.38 | 14.92 | 9.83 | 11.91 | 13.59 | 12.81 |
| Adj. R2 | 0.648 | 0.380 | 0.373 | 0.410 | 0.650 | 0.589 | 0.842 | 0.701 | 0.830 | 0.619 |
Pooled data over three years (2017–2020 for plant cane and 2018–2021 for ratoon cane) are presented. Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT).