Table 2.
Ranking of the ligands based on their Docking scores and RMSD values.
| Rank | Ligand | Docking scores (kcal/mol) | Summary of RMSD | Overall stability assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chrysophanic acid |
−6.4 | < 5 Å for 0–130 ns; 6–10 Å for remainder | Most stable overall, limited deviation |
| 2 | Esculetin | −6.3 | 1.5–4.5 Å for 0–130 ns; 5–11 Å thereafter | Very stable early on; moderate rise later |
| 3 | Control ligand | −4.3 | < 3 Å for 0–230 ns; then rises sharply to 6–54 Å | Stable for long, then large instability |
| 4 | Aloe emodin | −6.4 | < 5 Å for 0–70 ns; then 12–54 Å | Short early stability; large deviation |
| 5 | Aloesin | −7.4 | < 16 Å for 0–220 ns; then 16–24 Å | Highest RMSD overall; significant fluctuations |