Table 6.
Summary of Takeaways Related to ACS Sustainment
| PSAT Domain | Key Takeaways for Practitioners |
|---|---|
| Environmental Support (Including internal partnerships) | Facilitator: |
| Stakeholder buy-in | |
| Broad recognition of the clinical need for OUD | |
| Leadership support | |
| Champions throughout the hospital | |
| Funding Stability | Facilitator: |
| Grant or other support for start-up phase | |
| Transition to a stable funding source including internal funding | |
| Barrier: | |
| ACSs typically do not earn a profit due to key staff members who cannot bill | |
| Strategic Planning, Organizational Capacity | Facilitator: |
| Cross-disciplinary relationships within the hospital | |
| Interprofessional staffing mix and cross-departmental participation | |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Facilitator: |
| Monitoring and evaluating the ACS are considered crucial to sustainment | |
| Barrier: | |
| Metrics are not standardized or formalized within hospitals or across sites | |
| External Partnerships | Facilitator: |
| Relationships with community partners help ensure linkage from the hospital to ongoing care | |
| Ongoing Barriers to ACS Sustainment | Additional barriers: |
| Fee-for-service funding model is challenging, especially outside of academic settings | |
| Lack of adequate methadone treatment services outside the hospital, and barriers to linking patients on MOUD to acute care and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), impede referral and linkage to post-discharge care. | |
| Friction between hospital departments can impede ACS service delivery | |
| Workforce issues, such as finding staff to cover the ACS and staff turnover, are challenges for some ACSs |