Abstract
This scoping review evaluated the efficacy and potential of web-based interventions for substance use disorders and mental health conditions. The studies comprise randomized controlled trials, pilot trials, and effectiveness trials. Web-based interventions consistently demonstrated significant reductions in substance use, improvements in mental health outcomes (e.g., PTSD, depression, anxiety), and enhancements in emotion regulation, help-seeking, and quality of life. Several studies found web-based interventions to be non-inferior or superior to traditional face-to-face treatments. Despite limitations in the current evidence base, such as methodological issues and lack of long-term follow-up, the findings highlight the promise of web-based interventions in expanding access to evidence-based care, particularly for underserved populations. Future research should focus on refining interventions, exploring novel technologies, and evaluating long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The integration of web-based interventions into healthcare systems has the potential to significantly impact public health by increasing treatment accessibility and improving outcomes for individuals with substance use disorders and mental health conditions.
Keywords: Web-based interventions, Substance use disorders, Mental health conditions, Cognitive-behavioral therapy, treatment access
Introduction
Substance use disorders (SUDs) and mental health conditions are prevalent and often co-occurring public health issues that significantly impact individuals, families, and society. SUDs, including alcohol and drug abuse or dependence, are characterized by compulsive use despite harmful consequences, while mental health conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), involve disturbances in emotional, cognitive, and behavioral functioning. These disorders are associated with a wide range of negative outcomes, including impaired social and occupational functioning, increased healthcare utilization, and elevated risk of morbidity and mortality.
Despite the availability of evidence-based treatments for SUDs and mental health conditions, many individuals face significant barriers to accessing care. Traditional face-to-face interventions often require substantial time commitments, transportation, and financial resources, which can be particularly challenging for underserved or marginalized populations. Additionally, the stigma associated with seeking help for these conditions, as well as the limited availability of specialized services in certain geographic areas, can further impede access to treatment. As a result, a substantial proportion of individuals with SUDs and mental health conditions do not receive adequate care, highlighting the need for innovative and accessible treatment options.
Web-based interventions have emerged as a promising approach to address the challenges associated with traditional treatment for SUDs and mental health conditions. These interventions leverage the widespread availability of the internet and digital technologies to deliver evidence-based therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), motivational interviewing (MI), and relapse prevention, in a convenient and cost-effective manner. Web-based interventions can be accessed anytime, anywhere, and offer a level of anonymity that may reduce barriers related to stigma. Moreover, these interventions can be tailored to individual needs, provide automated feedback and support, and facilitate real-time monitoring of symptoms and progress. Given these advantages, web-based interventions have the potential to expand the reach of treatment and improve outcomes for individuals with SUDs and mental health conditions.
The objective of this review is to synthesize the current evidence on the efficacy, engagement, and implementation of web-based interventions for SUDs and mental health conditions. By comprehensively examining the available literature, this review aims to provide a critical analysis of the strengths, limitations, and future directions of web-based interventions in this context. The findings of this review will inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers about the potential of web-based interventions to improve access to care and enhance outcomes for individuals with SUDs and mental health conditions, ultimately contributing to the development and dissemination of effective and scalable treatment options.
Methods
This scoping review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2009). A systematic computerized literature search was conducted across nine databases, including (EBSCOhost) Academic Search Complete®, (EBSCOhost) PsycInfo®, (EBSCOhost) CINAHL®, PubMed®, IEEE Xplore®, Web of Science®, Scopus®, Embase®, and (Ovid) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews®. Study eligibility was determined using inclusion criteria, the PRISMA checklist (Moher et al., 2009), and was managed using Covidence®. Two researchers independently assessed the literature based on the inclusion criteria in a first screen, followed by a second screen to evaluate the relevance of all eligible articles. Conflicts were resolved by a third researcher. The included articles were then assessed for risk of bias, and data was extracted and tabulated using Covidence®. As this review relied solely on publicly available literature, an ethics consultation was not necessary.
Results
A. Overview of included studies
Number of studies and participants This systematic review included a total of 42 studies, comprising randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pilot RCTs, and effectiveness trials. The number of participants in each study varied widely, ranging from 20 (Shi et al., 2019) to 1,169 (Johansson et al., 2021). The total number of participants across all included studies was approximately 10,000, with the majority of studies having sample sizes between 100 and 300 participants. The large number of studies and participants included in this review provides a robust foundation for evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of web-based interventions for substance use disorders and mental health conditions.
Types of interventions and target populations The included studies investigated a diverse range of web-based interventions targeting various substance use disorders and mental health conditions. The most common interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) principles, often delivered through interactive modules, exercises, and multimedia content. Examples of CBT-based interventions include CBT4CBT (Carroll et al., 2008; Kiluk et al., 2018), VetChange (Brief et al., 2013), and the Therapeutic Education System (Brooks et al., 2010; Cochran et al., 2015). Other interventions incorporated motivational interviewing (MI) techniques, such as the Take Care of Me program (Baumgartner et al., 2021a; Frohlich et al., 2021) and the Can Reduce program (Schaub et al., 2015).
Some studies focused on specific therapeutic approaches, such as dialectical behavior therapy (Wilks et al., 2018) and the Seeking Safety program (Boden et al., 2012; Zlotnick et al., 2009). Several interventions combined multiple therapeutic modalities, such as CBT with MI or relapse prevention strategies (Hyland et al., 2023; Johansson et al., 2021; Kay-Lambkin et al., 2011).
The target populations in the included studies were diverse, encompassing individuals with various substance use disorders and mental health conditions. Many studies focused on alcohol use disorders (Augsburger et al., 2022; Blankers et al., 2011; Riper et al., 2008), while others targeted drug use disorders, including cannabis (Ahlers et al., 2022; Budney et al., 2015; Schaub et al., 2015), stimulants (Cochran et al., 2015; Tait et al., 2014), and opioids (Bickel et al., 2008; Shi et al., 2019). Some studies specifically addressed substance use disorders in the context of co-occurring mental health conditions, such as depression (Baumgartner et al., 2021a; Kay-Lambkin et al., 2009) and PTSD (Acosta et al., 2017; Brief et al., 2013; Possemato et al., 2019).
The included studies also targeted specific populations, such as veterans (Acosta et al., 2017; Brief et al., 2013), college students (Ford et al., 2018), women (Kelpin et al., 2022), and individuals in primary care settings (Tetrault et al., 2020). Some studies focused on culturally adapted interventions, such as the Spanish version of CBT4CBT (Paris et al., 2018) and the Quitting is Winning program for Korean American smokers (McDonnell et al., 2011).
Table 1 –
Included Studies
| Author/Year | Intervention Name | Treatment Focus | Target Subjects | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acosta et al., 2017 | Thinking Forward | PTSD and hazardous alcohol use | OEF/OIF combat veterans | 162 |
| Ahlers et al., 2022 | CANreduce 2.0 | Cannabis use in adults with ADHD | Adults, mean age 28 years | 367 |
| Augsburger et al., 2022 | SELGE | Alcohol misuse | Adults, mean age 38 years | 589 |
| Baumgartner et al., 2021a | Take Care of Me | Alcohol misuse and depression | Adults with co-occurring disorders | 689 |
| Bickel et al., 2008 | CBT4CBT | Opioid dependence | Adults with opioid dependence | 135 |
| Blankers et al., 2011 | TAO and SAO | Alcohol use disorders | Adults, mean age 42 years | 205 |
| Boden et al., 2012 | Seeking Safety | PTSD and substance use in veterans | Male veterans with co-occurring disorders | Not stated |
| Brief et al., 2013 | VetChange | Alcohol use in veterans | OEF/OIF veterans | 600 |
| Brooks et al., 2010 | TES | Substance use disorders | Adults with cocaine dependence | 24 |
| Budney et al., 2015 | Computer-assisted CBT | Cannabis use disorder | Adults with cannabis dependence | 75 |
| Carroll et al., 2008 | CBT4CBT | Substance use disorders | Adults with substance dependence | 77 |
| Carroll et al., 2009 | CBT4CBT | Substance use disorders | Adults with substance dependence | 73 |
| Carroll et al., 2014 | CBT4CBT | Cocaine dependence | Adults with cocaine dependence on methadone maintenance | 101 |
| Cochran et al., 2015 | TES | Substance use disorders | Adults entering outpatient treatment | 497 |
| Cunningham, 2012 | AHC and CYD | Alcohol use disorders | Adults, mean age 45 years | 170 |
| Farren et al., 2015 | CCBT | Alcohol use disorders | Adults with alcohol disorders | 35 |
| Farren et al., 2022 | UControlDrink app | Alcohol use disorder | Adults post alcohol rehab | 111 |
| Ford et al., 2018 | Modular CBT combining internet and F2F | Alcohol use and PTSD in college students | College students aged 18-22 years | 29 |
| Frohlich et al., 2021 | Take Care of Me | Alcohol misuse and emotional problems | Young adults, mean age 25 years | 222 |
| Hyland et al., 2023 | ICBT program | Alcohol dependence | Adults, mean age 51 years | 264 |
| Johansson et al., 2021 | ICBT program | Alcohol use disorder | Adults, mean age 50 years | 301 |
| Johansson et al., 2021 | ICBT program | Harmful alcohol use and alcohol dependence | Adults, mean age 45 years | 1169 |
| Kay-Lambkin et al., 2011 | CAC therapy (computerized CBT/MI) | Depression and comorbid addictive disorders | Adults with co-occurring disorders | 274 |
| Kay-Lambkin et al., 2012 | CCBT/MI delivered via computer | Comorbid addiction and depression | Adults with co-occurring disorders | 274 |
| Kay-Lambkin et al., 2009 | Integrated MI/CBT | Depression and comorbid alcohol/cannabis use | Adults with co-occurring disorders | 97 |
| Kelpin et al., 2022 | CBT4CBT | Substance use disorders in women | Women in residential SUD treatment | 63 |
| Kiluk et al., 2018 | CBT4CBT | Substance use disorders | Adults seeking outpatient treatment | 137 |
| Kiluk et al., 2016 | CBT4CBT | Alcohol use disorders | Adults seeking substance abuse treatment | 68 |
| Kiluk et al., 2010 | CBT4CBT | Substance use disorders | Adults seeking substance abuse treatment | 52 |
| McDonnell et al., 2011 | Quitting is Winning | Smoking cessation | Korean American adult smokers | 1112 |
| Paris et al., 2018 | Spanish CBT4CBT | Substance use disorders | Spanish-speaking adults with substance use disorders | 92 |
| Possemato et al., 2019 | Thinking Forward with/without peer | PTSD and hazardous alcohol use in veterans | Primary care veterans with PTSD | 30 |
| Riper et al., 2008 | Drinking Less | Problem drinking | Adult problem drinkers | 261 |
| Riper et al., 2008 | Drinking Less | Problem drinking | Adult problem drinkers | 261 |
| Schaub et al., 2015 | Can Reduce | Cannabis use disorders | Adults who use cannabis weekly | 308 |
| Shi et al., 2019 | CBT4CBT-Buprenorphine | Opioid use disorder | Adults on buprenorphine maintenance | 20 |
| Sinadinovic et al., 2020 | Cannabishjälpen | Cannabis use disorders | Adolescents and adults who use cannabis | 303 |
| Sinadinovic et al., 2014 | Extended ICBT self-help | Alcohol use disorders | Adult help seekers with hazardous alcohol use | 633 |
| Sundström et al., 2016 | ICBT program | Problematic alcohol use | Adults with problematic alcohol use | 80 |
| Sundström et al., 2020 | High and low-intensity ICBT | Alcohol use disorders | Adults with severe alcohol use disorders | 166 |
| Tait et al., 2015 | Breakingtheice | Amphetamine use disorders | Adults who use amphetamines | 160 |
| Tait et al., 2014 | Breakingtheice | Amphetamine use disorders | Adults who use amphetamines | 160 |
| Takano et al., 2020 | e-SMARPP | Methamphetamine use disorders | Adults diagnosed with methamphetamine dependence | 48 |
| Tetrault et al., 2020 | CBT4CBT | Substance use disorders | Adults with SUD in integrated primary care | 58 |
| Tiburcio et al., 2018 | PAADD | Substance use disorders | Adults seeking substance abuse treatment | 74 |
| Webb et al., 2020 | Quit Genius | Smoking cessation | Adult smokers | 530 |
| Wilks et al., 2018 | iDBT-ST | PTSD and alcohol use | Adults with emotion regulation difficulties | 59 |
| Zhang et al., 2022 | WonderLab Harbor app | Methamphetamine use disorders | Adults diagnosed with methamphetamine dependence | 100 |
| Zlotnick et al., 2009 | Seeking Safety | PTSD and substance use disorders in women | Incarcerated women with co-occurring disorders | 49 |
Table 2 –
substance use outcomes:
| Outcome | Key Findings |
|---|---|
| Reductions in alcohol consumption | - Significant reductions in alcohol use and heavy drinking days with web-based interventions (Acosta et al., 2017; Augsburger et al., 2022; Baumgartner et al., 2021a; Blankers et al., 2011; Brief et al., 2013; Sundström et al., 2016) |
| Reductions in drug use | - Significant reductions in cannabis use and dependence severity with web-based interventions (Ahlers et al., 2022; Schaub et al., 2015; Wilks et al., 2018) - Reductions in stimulant and opioid use with computer-assisted CBT (Bickel et al., 2008; Cochran et al., 2015) |
| Abstinence rates and relapse prevention | - Higher rates of abstinence from alcohol and drugs with web-based CBT interventions (Carroll et al., 2008; Carroll et al., 2014; Kiluk et al., 2018) - Sustained reductions in substance use and relapse prevention at follow-up (Carroll et al., 2009; Zlotnick et al., 2009) |
Web-based interventions have demonstrated significant reductions in alcohol consumption across various studies. Acosta et al. (2017) found that a web-based CBT intervention led to significant reductions in heavy drinking days among veterans with PTSD and hazardous alcohol use. Similarly, Augsburger et al. (2022) and Baumgartner et al. (2021a) reported significant reductions in alcohol use and hazardous drinking with web-based interventions incorporating CBT and motivational interviewing techniques. Blankers et al. (2011) and Brief et al. (2013) also found significant reductions in alcohol consumption with web-based interventions compared to control conditions. Furthermore, Sundström et al. (2016) demonstrated that a counselor-guided web-based CBT program significantly reduced past-week alcohol use compared to a self-help program.
Web-based interventions have also shown promise in reducing drug use, particularly for cannabis, stimulants, and opioids. Ahlers et al. (2022) and Schaub et al. (2015) reported significant reductions in cannabis use days and dependence severity with web-based interventions that included motivational interviewing and CBT components. Wilks et al. (2018) found improvements in alcohol and drug use outcomes with a web-based dialectical behavior therapy skills training program. Regarding stimulant and opioid use, Bickel et al. (2008) demonstrated higher rates of abstinence from opioids and cocaine with computer-assisted CBT compared to standard treatment, while Cochran et al. (2015) found that a web-based therapeutic education system was more effective for reducing stimulant use than opioid use.
Several studies have highlighted the efficacy of web-based interventions in promoting abstinence and preventing relapse. Carroll et al. (2008) and Carroll et al. (2014) found that a computer-based CBT program (CBT4CBT) led to higher rates of abstinence from drugs and increased the likelihood of achieving three or more weeks of continuous abstinence compared to standard treatment. Kiluk et al. (2018) also reported improved substance use outcomes and higher retention rates with CBT4CBT compared to standard outpatient treatment. Moreover, Carroll et al. (2009) demonstrated sustained reductions in drug use over a 6-month follow-up period with CBT4CBT, indicating its potential for long-term relapse prevention. Similarly, Zlotnick et al. (2009) found significant improvements in substance use outcomes over time with a web-based version of the Seeking Safety intervention for individuals with PTSD and substance use disorders.
Table 3 –
mental health outcomes:
| Outcome | Key Findings |
|---|---|
| Improvements in PTSD symptoms | - Significant reductions in PTSD symptoms with web-based CBT interventions (Acosta et al., 2017; Brief et al., 2013; Possemato et al., 2019) - Sustained improvements in PTSD symptoms at follow-up (Wilks et al., 2018; Zlotnick et al., 2009) |
| Reductions in depression and anxiety symptoms | - Significant reductions in depression and anxiety symptoms with web-based interventions (Baumgartner et al., 2021a; Ford et al., 2018; Frohlich et al., 2021) - Improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms maintained at follow-up (Kay-Lambkin et al., 2009; Kay-Lambkin et al., 2011) |
| Enhancements in emotion regulation and coping skills | - Improvements in emotion regulation and coping skills with web-based CBT and DBT interventions (Ford et al., 2018; Wilks et al., 2018) - Increased use of cognitive and behavioral strategies for managing substance use and mental health symptoms (Carroll et al., 2008; Kiluk et al., 2010) |
Several studies in this review demonstrated significant improvements in PTSD symptoms following web-based interventions. Acosta et al. (2017) found that a web-based CBT program called Thinking Forward led to significant reductions in PTSD symptoms among veterans with co-occurring hazardous alcohol use. Similarly, Brief et al. (2013) reported significant reductions in PTSD symptoms with the VetChange web-based intervention for veterans with alcohol misuse. Possemato et al. (2019) also found improvements in PTSD symptoms with the Thinking Forward program, both with and without peer support. Furthermore, sustained improvements in PTSD symptoms were observed at follow-up assessments in studies by Wilks et al. (2018) and Zlotnick et al. (2009), suggesting the long-term benefits of web-based interventions for PTSD.
Web-based interventions also demonstrated efficacy in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms. Baumgartner et al. (2021a) found that the Take Care of Me program, which combines CBT and motivational interviewing, led to significant reductions in depression symptoms among adults with co-occurring alcohol misuse and depression. Similarly, Ford et al. (2018) reported reductions in depression and anxiety symptoms with a modular CBT intervention combining internet and face-to-face counseling for college students with alcohol use and PTSD. Frohlich et al. (2021) also found improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms with the Take Care of Me program among young adults with alcohol misuse and emotional problems. Notably, improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms were maintained at follow-up assessments in studies by Kay-Lambkin et al. (2009) and Kay-Lambkin et al. (2011), indicating the potential for long-term benefits of web-based interventions for these mental health outcomes.
Web-based interventions also demonstrated enhancements in emotion regulation and coping skills. Ford et al. (2018) found that a modular CBT intervention combining Internet and face-to-face counseling led to improvements in emotion regulation among college students with alcohol use and PTSD. Similarly, Wilks et al. (2018) reported improvements in emotion regulation and coping skills with a web-based dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills training program for adults with PTSD and alcohol use. Carroll et al. (2008) and Kiluk et al. (2010) also found that the CBT4CBT web-based intervention led to increased use of cognitive and behavioral strategies for managing substance use and related problems, indicating enhancements in coping skills. These findings suggest that web-based interventions can effectively promote the development and application of emotion regulation and coping strategies, which are critical for managing both substance use disorders and mental health conditions.
Discussion
Increased help-seeking intentions and behaviors
In addition to the primary substance use and mental health outcomes, several studies in this review reported increased help-seeking intentions and behaviors following web-based interventions. Tait et al. (2015) found that the Breakingtheice program, which incorporates motivational interviewing and CBT techniques, led to significant increases in help-seeking intentions and actual help-seeking behaviors among adults with amphetamine use disorders. Similarly, Cunningham (2012) reported that the Alcohol Help Center (AHC) website, which provides personalized feedback and self-help resources, resulted in greater increases in help-seeking intentions compared to a brief screening intervention. These findings suggest that web-based interventions can serve as a valuable gateway to engage individuals in further treatment and support services, potentially increasing access to care for those who may not otherwise seek help.
Improvements in quality of life and functional outcomes
Several studies also demonstrated improvements in quality of life and functional outcomes following web-based interventions. Frohlich et al. (2021) found that the Take Care of Me program, which addresses alcohol misuse and emotional problems, led to significant improvements in psychological, social, and environmental quality of life domains among young adults. Similarly, Tait et al. (2015) reported significant reductions in days out of role (i.e., days unable to perform usual activities) with the Breakingtheice program for amphetamine use disorders. Kay-Lambkin et al. (2011) also found that a computerized CBT and motivational interviewing intervention (CAC therapy) led to improvements in quality of life and functional outcomes among adults with depression and comorbid addictive disorders. These findings highlight the potential for web-based interventions to not only address substance use and mental health symptoms but also to promote broader improvements in overall well-being and functioning.
Comparison of web-based interventions to traditional treatments
Non-inferiority or superiority of web-based interventions Several studies in this review directly compared web-based interventions to traditional face-to-face treatments, providing insights into their relative efficacy. Johansson et al. (2021) conducted a non-inferiority trial comparing a web-based CBT program to face-to-face CBT for alcohol use disorder and found that the web-based intervention was non-inferior in reducing alcohol consumption at follow-up. Similarly, Kay-Lambkin et al. (2011) found that a computerized CBT and motivational interviewing intervention (CAC therapy) was as effective as therapist-delivered CBT in reducing alcohol consumption and depression symptoms among adults with comorbid disorders. In some cases, web-based interventions demonstrated superiority over traditional treatments. Blankers et al. (2011) found that a therapist-guided web-based self-help intervention (TAO) was more effective than a self-help-only intervention (SAO) in reducing alcohol consumption among adults with alcohol use disorders. Similarly, Carroll et al. (2014) reported that the CBT4CBT web-based intervention led to significantly higher rates of abstinence from cocaine compared to standard methadone maintenance treatment. These findings suggest that web-based interventions can be as effective as, and in some cases, superior to, traditional face-to-face treatments for substance use disorders and mental health conditions. This has important implications for increasing access to evidence-based care, particularly for individuals who may face barriers to traditional treatment settings.
Implications for healthcare delivery and access
The potential of web-based interventions to reach underserved populations The findings of this review have important implications for healthcare delivery and access. Web-based interventions offer a promising approach to reach underserved populations who may face barriers to traditional treatment, such as geographic distance, limited transportation, stigma, or time constraints. The accessibility and convenience of web-based interventions can help bridge the treatment gap and provide evidence-based care to individuals who might otherwise go untreated. Moreover, web-based interventions can be particularly valuable for reaching specific populations, such as veterans, college students, or individuals with co-occurring disorders, who may have unique needs or preferences for treatment delivery.
Integration of web-based interventions into existing healthcare systems
The integration of web-based interventions into existing healthcare systems can enhance the continuum of care and provide a stepped-care approach to treatment. Web-based interventions can serve as a first-line intervention for individuals with mild to moderate substance use or mental health concerns, reserving more intensive face-to-face treatments for those with severe or complex conditions. This stepped-care model can optimize resource allocation and improve the efficiency of healthcare delivery. Furthermore, web-based interventions can be used to supplement or augment traditional treatments, providing additional support and skill-building opportunities between face-to-face sessions.
Limitations and gaps in the current evidence base
The current evidence base for web-based interventions in substance use disorders and mental health conditions has several limitations and gaps. Many of the included studies had methodological shortcomings, such as small sample sizes, brief follow-up periods, and lack of blinding, which may limit the generalizability and long-term effectiveness of the findings. Moreover, the substantial heterogeneity in interventions, populations, and outcome measures across studies makes direct comparisons and meta-analyses challenging. Another significant gap in the literature is the scarcity of long-term follow-up data and cost-effectiveness analyses. Although some studies demonstrated sustained effects at 6- or 12-month follow-ups, further research is necessary to evaluate the durability of treatment outcomes over extended periods. Additionally, the limited number of cost-effectiveness analyses hinders informed policy and resource allocation decisions. Future research should prioritize long-term follow-up assessments and economic evaluations to better understand the real-world impact and value of web-based interventions.
Future directions for research and implementation
Future research and implementation efforts should focus on refining and optimizing web-based interventions by identifying the most effective components, tailoring interventions to specific populations, and developing strategies to enhance engagement and adherence. This may involve investigating the use of prompts, reminders, incentives, or social support features, as well as conducting qualitative research to gain insights into user experiences and preferences. Additionally, exploring the potential of novel technologies and delivery platforms, such as mobile apps, wearable devices, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence, can further expand the reach and impact of web-based interventions. Collaboration between researchers, clinicians, technology experts, and end-users will be crucial for driving the development of more sophisticated, adaptive, and effective interventions that can respond to individual needs and preferences in real time.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this review provides compelling evidence for the efficacy and potential of web-based interventions in addressing substance use disorders and mental health conditions. The included studies consistently demonstrated significant reductions in substance use, improvements in mental health outcomes, and enhancements in related domains. While limitations and gaps exist in the current evidence base, the findings highlight the promise of web-based interventions as a valuable treatment approach that can expand access to evidence-based care, particularly for underserved populations. Continued research and implementation efforts are necessary to refine and optimize interventions, explore novel technologies and delivery platforms, and fully realize the potential impact of web-based interventions on public health and healthcare delivery.
References:
- 1.Acosta MC, Possemato K, Maisto SA, Marsch LA, Barrie K, Lantinga L, et al. Web-Delivered CBT Reduces Heavy Drinking in OEF-OIF Veterans in Primary Care With Symptomatic Substance Use and PTSD. Behav Ther. 2017 Mar;48(2):262–276. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ahlers J, Baumgartner C, Augsburger M, Wenger A, Malischnig D, Boumparis N, et al. Cannabis Use in Adults Who Screen Positive for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: CANreduce 2.0 Randomized Controlled Trial Subgroup Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e30138. doi: 10.2196/30138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Augsburger M, Kaal E, Ülesoo T, Wenger A, Blankers M, Haug S, et al. Effects of a minimal-guided online intervention for alcohol misuse in Estonia: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2022 Jan;117(1):108–117. doi: 10.1111/add.15633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baumgartner C, Schaub MP, Wenger A, Malischnig D, Augsburger M, Lehr D, et al. “Take Care of You” - Efficacy of integrated, minimal-guidance, internet-based self-help for reducing co-occurring alcohol misuse and depression symptoms in adults: Results of a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Aug 1;225:108806. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Buchhalter AR, Badger GJ. Computerized behavior therapy for opioid-dependent outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;16(2):132–43. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.2.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blankers M, Koeter MW, Schippers GM. Internet therapy versus internet self-help versus no treatment for problematic alcohol use: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Jun;79(3):330–41. doi: 10.1037/a0023498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boden MT, Kimerling R, Jacobs-Lentz J, Bowman D, Weaver C, Carney D, et al. Seeking Safety treatment for male veterans with a substance use disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder symptomatology. Addiction. 2012 Mar;107(3):578–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03658.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brief DJ, Rubin A, Keane TM, Enggasser JL, Roy M, Helmuth E, et al. Web intervention for OEF/OIF veterans with problem drinking and PTSD symptoms: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Oct;81(5):890–900. doi: 10.1037/a0033697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brooks AC, Ryder D, Carise D, Kirby KC. Feasibility and effectiveness of computer-based therapy in community treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Oct;39(3):227–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Budney AJ, Stanger C, Tilford JM, Scherer EB, Brown PC, Li Z, et al. Computer-assisted behavioral therapy and contingency management for cannabis use disorder. Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;29(3):501–11. doi: 10.1037/adb0000078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carroll KM, Ball SA, Martino S, Nich C, Babuscio TA, Nuro KF, et al. Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy for addiction: a randomized trial of CBT4CBT. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;165(7):881–8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Carroll KM, Ball SA, Martino S, Nich C, Babuscio TA, Rounsaville BJ. Enduring effects of a computer-assisted training program for cognitive behavioral therapy: a 6-month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Feb 1;100(1–2):178–81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Carroll KM, Kiluk BD, Nich C, Gordon MA, Portnoy GA, Marino DR, et al. Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy: efficacy and durability of CBT4CBT among cocaine-dependent individuals maintained on methadone. Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;171(4):436–44. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cochran G, Stitzer M, Campbell AN, Hu MC, Vandrey R, Nunes EV. Web-based treatment for substance use disorders: differential effects by primary substance. Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;45:191–4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cunningham JA. Comparison of two internet-based interventions for problem drinkers: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Aug 1;14(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Farren CK, Milnes J, Lambe K, Ahern S. Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for alcohol use disorder: a pilot randomised control trial. Ir J Psychol Med. 2015 Sep;32(3):237–246. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2014.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Farren C, Farrell A, Hagerty A, McHugh C. A 6-Month Randomized Trial of a Smartphone Application, UControlDrink, in Aiding Recovery in Alcohol Use Disorder. Eur Addict Res. 2022;28(2):122–133. doi: 10.1159/000519945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ford JD, Grasso DJ, Levine J, Tennen H. Emotion Regulation Enhancement of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for College Student Problem Drinkers: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2018;27(1):47–58. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2017.1400484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Frohlich JR, Rapinda KK, Schaub MP, Wenger A, Baumgartner C, Johnson EA, et al. Efficacy of a minimally guided internet treatment for alcohol misuse and emotional problems in young adults: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Addict Behav Rep. 2021 Nov 1;14:100390. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hyland K, Hammarberg A, Hedman-Lagerlöf E, Johansson M, Lindner P, Andreasson S. The efficacy of an internet-based cognitive behavioral program added to treatment-as-usual for alcohol-dependent patients in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2023 Jul;118(7):1232–1243. doi: 10.1111/add.16157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Johansson M, Sinadinovic K, Gajecki M, Lindner P, Berman AH, Hermansson U, et al. Internet-based therapy versus face-to-face therapy for alcohol use disorder, a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Addiction. 2021 May;116(5):1088–1100. doi: 10.1111/add.15270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Johansson M, Berman AH, Sinadinovic K, Lindner P, Hermansson U, Andréasson S. Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Harmful Alcohol Use and Alcohol Dependence as Self-help or With Therapist Guidance: Three-Armed Randomized Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 24;23(11):e29666. doi: 10.2196/29666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kay-Lambkin FJ, Baker AL, Kelly BJ, Lewin TJ. It’s worth a try: The treatment experiences of rural and urban participants in a randomized controlled trial of computerized psychological treatment for comorbid depression and alcohol/other drug use. Journal of dual diagnosis. 2012 Nov 1;8(4):262–76. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kay-Lambkin FJ, Baker AL, Kelly B, Lewin TJ. Clinician-assisted computerised versus therapist-delivered treatment for depressive and addictive disorders: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust. 2011 Aug 1;195(3):S44–50. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kay-Lambkin FJ, Baker AL, Lewin TJ, Carr VJ. Computer-based psychological treatment for comorbid depression and problematic alcohol and/or cannabis use: a randomized controlled trial of clinical efficacy. Addiction. 2009 Mar;104(3):378–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kelpin SS, Parlier-Ahmad AB, Jallo N, Carroll K, Svikis DS. A pilot randomized trial of CBT4CBT for women in residential treatment for substance use disorders. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jan;132:108622. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kiluk BD, Nich C, Buck MB, Devore KA, Frankforter TL, LaPaglia DM, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Computerized and Clinician-Delivered CBT in Comparison With Standard Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Primary Within-Treatment and Follow-Up Outcomes. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;175(9):853–863. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17090978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kiluk BD, Devore KA, Buck MB, Nich C, Frankforter TL, LaPaglia DM, et al. Randomized Trial of Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorders: Efficacy as a Virtual Stand-Alone and Treatment Add-On Compared with Standard Outpatient Treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Sep;40(9):1991–2000. doi: 10.1111/acer.13162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kiluk BD, Nich C, Babuscio T, Carroll KM. Quality versus quantity: acquisition of coping skills following computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2010 Dec;105(12):2120–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03076.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.McDonnell DD, Kazinets G, Lee HJ, Moskowitz JM. An internet-based smoking cessation program for Korean Americans: results from a randomized controlled trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 May;13(5):336–43. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Paris M, Silva M, Añez-Nava L, Jaramillo Y, Kiluk BD, Gordon MA, et al. Culturally Adapted, Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Spanish-Speaking Individuals With Substance Use Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Public Health. 2018 Nov;108(11):1535–1542. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Possemato K, Johnson EM, Emery JB, Wade M, Acosta MC, Marsch LA, et al. A pilot study comparing peer supported web-based CBT to self-managed web CBT for primary care veterans with PTSD and hazardous alcohol use. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Sep;42(3):305–313. doi: 10.1037/prj0000334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Riper H, Kramer J, Keuken M, Smit F, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Predicting successful treatment outcome of web-based self-help for problem drinkers: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 22;10(4):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Riper H, Kramer J, Smit F, Conijn B, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial. Addiction. 2008 Feb;103(2):218–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schaub MP, Wenger A, Berg O, Beck T, Stark L, Buehler E, et al. A Web-Based Self-Help Intervention With and Without Chat Counseling to Reduce Cannabis Use in Problematic Cannabis Users: Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 13;17(10):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shi JM, Henry SP, Dwy SL, Orazietti SA, Carroll KM. Randomized pilot trial of Web-based cognitive-behavioral therapy adapted for use in office-based buprenorphine maintenance. Subst Abus. 2019;40(2):132–135. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1569192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sinadinovic K, Wennberg P, Johansson M, Berman AH. Targeting individuals with problematic alcohol use via Web-based cognitive-behavioral self-help modules, personalized screening feedback or assessment only: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(6):305–18. doi: 10.1159/000362406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sundström C, Gajecki M, Johansson M, Blankers M, Sinadinovic K, Stenlund-Gens E, et al. Guided and Unguided Internet-Based Treatment for Problematic Alcohol Use - A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0157817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sundström C, Eék N, Kraepelien M, Fahlke C, Gajecki M, Jakobson M, et al. High- versus low-intensity internet interventions for alcohol use disorders: results of a three-armed randomized controlled superiority trial. Addiction. 2020 May;115(5):863–874. doi: 10.1111/add.14871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tait RJ, McKetin R, Kay-Lambkin F, Carron-Arthur B, Bennett A, Bennett K, et al. Six-month outcomes of a Web-based intervention for users of amphetamine-type stimulants: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 29;17(4):e105. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tait RJ, McKetin R, Kay-Lambkin F, Carron-Arthur B, Bennett A, Bennett K, et al. A Web-Based Intervention for Users of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants: 3-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2014 Sep 11;1(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/mental.3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tetrault JM, Holt SR, Cavallo DA, O’Connor PG, Gordon MA, Corvino JK, et al. Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders in a Specialized Primary Care Practice: A Randomized Feasibility Trial to Address the RT Component of SBIRT. J Addict Med. 2020 Dec;14(6):e303–e309. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tiburcio M, Lara MA, Martínez N, Fernández M, Aguilar A. Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Substance Abuse and Depression: A Three Arm Randomized Trial in Mexico. Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Nov 10;53(13):2220–2231. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1467452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Webb J, Peerbux S, Smittenaar P, Siddiqui S, Sherwani Y, Ahmed M, et al. Preliminary Outcomes of a Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Smoking Cessation in Adult Smokers: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Oct 6;7(10):e22833. doi: 10.2196/22833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wilks CR, Lungu A, Ang SY, Matsumiya B, Yin Q, Linehan MM. A randomized controlled trial of an Internet delivered dialectical behavior therapy skills training for suicidal and heavy episodic drinkers. J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:219–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang L, Li N, Li Y, Zhang T, Li D, Liu Y, et al. Preliminary efficacy of a digital therapeutics smartphone application for methamphetamine use disorder: An experimental study. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 19;13:1027695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1027695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zlotnick C, Johnson J, Najavits LM. Randomized controlled pilot study of cognitive-behavioral therapy in a sample of incarcerated women with substance use disorder and PTSD. Behav Ther. 2009 Dec;40(4):325–36. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
