Abstract
Background
Lifestyle interventions, including Nordic walking, a whole‐body exercise session, are beneficial for metabolic diseases, including diabetes. However, evidence from research studies or meta‐analyses on the efficacy of Nordic walking in improving clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes/prediabetes remains inconclusive.
Purpose
This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the efficiency of Nordic walking on anthropometrics, glycemic control, lipid profiles, blood pressure, and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in adults with prediabetes/diabetes.
Methods
A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase until June 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults with prediabetes or diabetes that compared the Nordic walking effect with a control trial. Data on clinical outcomes, including anthropometrics, glycemic control, lipid profiles, blood pressure, and VO2peak, were extracted for meta‐analysis and presented as mean difference (MD).
Results
A total of six RCTs, comprising 321 adults with prediabetes or diabetes (63% male), were included in the analysis. Meta‐analysis results showed that compared with control, Nordic walking significantly decreased body weight (MD = −0.79 kg, p = 0.02), and marginally reduced waist circumference (MD = −0.82 cm, p = 0.07). Notably, Nordic walking decreased glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD = −0.37%, p = 0.0001) but showed high heterogeneity (I 2 = 69%). Subgroup analysis revealed a greater reduction of HbA1c in adults with diabetes (MD = −0.49%, p < 0.00001) than that of adults with prediabetes (MD = −0.2%, p = 0.001). However, Nordic walking did not affect fasting blood glucose or homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR). Additionally, Nordic walking significantly increased high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (MD = 0.07 mmol/L, p = 0.005), while showing no beneficial effects on total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low‐density lipoprotein. Nordic walking appears to improve VO2peak but does not affect systolic or diastolic blood pressure.
Conclusions
Nordic walking exerted beneficial effects on body weight, HbA1c, and HDL in adults with prediabetes or diabetes. Our findings support that Nordic walking can be a practical intervention in managing or treating diabetic complications.
Keywords: blood pressure, body weight, cholesterol, HbA1c, hyperglycemia, pole walking
1. Introduction
Type 2 diabetes is characterized by elevated blood glucose levels or higher concentrations of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). The higher HbA1c level, ranging from 5.7% to 6.4%, is defined as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or prediabetes, which progresses to Type 2 diabetes if not controlled [1, 2]. Individuals with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes have a greater risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) compared with those with normoglycemia [3, 4]. According to the latest data from the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), there are 634.8 million adults with prediabetes and 588.7 million adults with diabetes living worldwide. The number of prediabetes and diabetes cases is projected to increase to 846.5 and 852.5 million, respectively, by 2050 [5]. Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, including physical inactivity, prolonged sedentary time, and poor dietary habits, can alter anthropometrics and glycemic levels, which may progress to prediabetes or diabetes over time [6–9]. Practicing a healthy lifestyle includes engaging in regular exercise programs, either aerobic or resistance training, which is strongly associated with improved glycemic control in people with prediabetes or diabetes [10–12]. Aerobic exercise is an effective intervention that decreases body weight, HbA1c, and hyperlipidemia in patients with diabetes [13–15].
Nordic walking, a form of aerobic exercise, was developed in Scandinavia and is a popular practice in Europe [16]. Nordic walking is a specialized form of exercise like skiing that incorporates specially designed poles to combine upper body movement with walking and allows for greater energy expenditure. Approximately 70%–90% of the body′s skeletal muscles are involved during Nordic walking [17]. Compared with normal walking without poles, Nordic walking with poles can increase walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication [18]. Nordic walking can be incorporated into the daily exercise routine and is claimed to enhance aerobic capacity, strength, and quality of life of older adults [19]. Existing results from randomized control trials (RCTs) showed inconclusive effects of Nordic walking on glycemic control and lipid profiles in people with prediabetes or diabetes. For instance, one RCT conducted on overweight/obese adults with diabetes or prediabetes (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m2, age above 59 years) demonstrated that 16‐week unsupervised Nordic walking decreased HbA1c in adults with diabetes but not in adults with prediabetes, whereas the lipid profile remained unchanged in both groups [20]. In contrast, another RCT recruited overweight/obese adults with prediabetes (mean BMI: 30 kg/m2, mean age: 55 years) and showed that 12‐week Nordic walking (supervised) did not affect blood glucose, HbA1c, and high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol compared with control [21]. Furthermore, 6‐month supervised Nordic walking significantly improved fasting blood glucose (FBG) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in older adults with diabetes (mean BMI 27 kg/m2, age 65 years) but did not affect HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) levels compared with baseline [22].
Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses represent the highest levels of clinical evidence and are fundamental in developing clinical practice guidelines [23]. Some systematic reviews and meta‐analyses have reported the clinical significance of Nordic walking for various populations, including those with CVDs [17, 24, 25], respiratory diseases [26], Parkinson′s disease [27], and overweight/obesity [28]. However, no meta‐analysis has synthesized the evidence to address the effect of Nordic walking on clinical outcomes in adults with prediabetes or diabetes. Although few meta‐analyses explored the impact of Nordic walking on glycemic control or lipid profile, the included patients in those meta‐analyses were not exclusively diabetic, and the synthesized evidence showed diverse effects. One meta‐analysis of adults with overweight or obesity (eight RCTs, n = 465) found no significant benefits of Nordic walking on HbA1c, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR), BMI, and lipid profiles compared with control [28]. A recent meta‐analysis of 22 RCTs comprising 1,271 older adults (mean age 62 years) concluded that Nordic walking had no effect on HbA1c but improved other cardiovascular risk factors, such as BMI, TC, TG, and SBP [24]. These conflicting results from RCTs [20–22] and meta‐analyses [24, 28] can be attributed to certain limitations, including broader inclusion criteria, no restriction on health status, overlooking of baseline glycemic levels, significant demographic heterogeneity, and relatively smaller sample size. This evidence gap is critical because prediabetes is strongly associated with increased risk of CVDs and all‐cause mortality [4, 29]. An intervention that effectively manages prediabetes not only prevents the incidence of diabetes but also decreases the risk of developing CVDs. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta‐analysis focusing exclusively on adults with prediabetes and diabetes to determine the efficacy of Nordic walking. Unlike previous meta‐analyses with broader inclusion criteria, our meta‐analysis included RCTs of adults with prediabetes or diabetes, and it is the first study to investigate the effects of Nordic walking on both prediabetes and diabetes groups via subgroup analysis. We examined the effects of Nordic walking on anthropometric measures, glycemic control, lipid profiles, and blood pressure.
2. Methods
2.1. Protocol Registration and Search Strategy
This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO with the registration number CRD420251024310. We conducted a literature search on PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase from inception until June 2025. A comprehensive search strategy for primary studies was developed and performed by three authors (S.C., X.A., and A.W.). The specific keywords used in the search are as follows: “Nordic walking” OR “walking Nordic” OR “Nordic exercise” OR “pole walking” OR “walking pole” AND “Type 2 diabetes mellitus” OR “Type 2 diabetes” OR “diabetes” OR “T2DM” OR “prediabetes” OR “insulin resistance” OR “impaired glucose tolerance” OR “homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance” OR “HOMA‐IR”. The search was performed to find RCTs. Alternatively, a manual search was also conducted from the reference list of all included articles for any relevant studies to be included. The article search and review process was conducted strictly in accordance with the latest guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) [30]. Further details are given in the PRISMA checklist, and the checklist is provided as Table S1. The complete search strategy on each database with the keywords is provided in Table S2.
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
As we aimed to explore the effect of Nordic walking on health‐related outcomes in individuals with diabetes or prediabetes, we adopted the following inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. The inclusion criteria were (1) all participants must be adults with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes; (2) the study should be an RCT with Nordic walking and a control trial; (3) the study should report at least one of the diabetes‐related markers; (4) the duration of the trial intervention should be 4 weeks or more; and (5) studies should be published in English as full‐text articles. The exclusion criteria were (1) participants with Type 1 diabetes; (2) Nordic walking combined with other interventions; and (3) the study did not report the relevant outcome indicators or had insufficient data. According to the above‐mentioned criteria, two authors (S.C. and A.W.) independently conducted a thorough review and evaluation of the relevant articles. Any differences in opinion on the inclusion or exclusion of articles were resolved by discussing with the corresponding authors (M.K. and W.Y.).
2.3. Outcome Measures and Data Extraction
Three authors (S.C., X.A., and A.W.) independently extracted the study details and outcome measures data of all included articles. The other authors (Y.L., V.R.L., and B.LVKS) verified the data. Any discrepancies were resolved by other authors (M.K. and W.Y.) through discussion. The information extracted from each article includes: study details (authors, publication year, and region where the study was conducted), participants′ characteristics (sample size, mean age, and gender), intervention details (frequency and duration), and a list of outcome measures (body composition, diabetes markers, lipid profile, blood pressure, and VO2peak). Specific details of all extracted data were presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Study details | Participants′ characteristics | Intervention | Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author, year country | Sample size (M/F) | Age (years) m e a n ± S D | HbA1c (%) m e a n ± S D | BMI (kg/m 2 ) m e a n ± S D | TC, TG (mmol/L) m e a n ± S D | Time/frequency | Duration | |
| Athwale and Shukla, 2024 [31] India | Con: 35 (20/15) T2D: 35 (17/18) | Con: 51.2 ± 7.6 T2D: 49.6 ± 7.2 | Con: 7.5 ± 1.4 T2D: 8.0 ± 1.2 | Con: 22.9 ± 2.2 T2D: 22.7 ± 1.9 | NR | 60 min/session 5‐time/week | 4 weeks | HbA1c, VO2max, distance walked |
| Fritz et al. 2013 [20] Sweden | Con: 21 (10/11) IGT: 14 (5/9) Con: 30 (20/10) T2D: 20 (13/7) | Con: 61.8 ± 3.4 IGT: 59.1 ± 6.2 Con: 61.0 ± 4.7 T2D: 61.4 ± 4.6 | Con: 5.9 ± 0.3 IGT: 5.9 ± 0.4 Con: 6.9 ± 0.9 T2D: 7.1 ± 0.9 | Con: 30.8 ± 3.5 IGT: 32.0 ± 5.2 Con: 31.1 ± 3.9 T2D: 31.7 ± 5.2 | Con: 6.0 ± 0.9 Con: 1.7 ± 0.9 IGT: 5.5 ± 0.9 IGT: 1.7 ± 1.2 Con: 4.5 ± 0.8 Con: 1.3 ± 0.4 T2D: 4.8 ± 0.9 T2D: 1.7 ± 0.7 | 5 h/week | 16 weeks | Body weight, BMI, SBP, DBP, waist circumference, HbA1c, HOMA‐IR, p‐glucose fasting, p‐glucose 2 h post‐load, TG, TC, HDL, LDL, VO2peak |
| Gram et al. 2010 [32] Denmark | Con:22 (13/9) T2D:22 (10/12) | Con: 61.0 ± 10.0 T2D: 62.0 ± 10.0 | Con: 7.8 ± 1.3 T2D: 7.2 ± 1.0 | Con: 32.8 ± 4.0 T2D: 31.4 ± 4.3 | Con: 4.6 ± 1.4 Con: NR T2D: 4.3 ± 0.9 T2D: NR | 45 min/session 2‐time/week for first 8 weeks 1‐time/week for final 8 weeks | 16 weeks | HbA1c, body weight, BMI, VO2max, waist circumference, SBP, DBP, hip circumference, TC, HDL, LDL |
| Jabardo‐Camprubí et al. 2023 [33] Spain | Con: 12 (7/5) T2D: 11 (8/3) | Con: 72.1 ± 10.0 T2D: 67.7 ± 5.1 | Con: 6.7 ± 1.5 T2D: 7.3 ± 2.3 | Con: 31.2 ± 8.0 T2D: 31.9 ± 6.2 | NR | 2‐time/week | 12 weeks | Waist circumference, HbA1c, BMI |
| Sentinelli et al. 2015 [34] Italy | Con: 10 (0/10) T2D: 10 (0/10) | Con: 60.0 ± 5.0 T2D: 54.0 ± 9.0 | Con: 7.1 ± 1.3 T2D: 7.1 ± 1.3 | Con: 32.3 ± 6.0 T2D: 32.0 ± 7.0 | Con: 5.2 ± 1.1 Con: 1.2 ± 0.7 T2D: 4.3 ± 0.8 T2D: 1.4 ± 0.5 | 60‐90 min/session 3‐time/week | 12 weeks | Body weight, BMI, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, fasting blood glucose |
| Venojärvi et al. 2012 [21] Finland | Con: 40 (40/0) IGT: 39 (39/0) | Con: 54.0 ± 7.2 IGT: 55.0 ± 6.2 | Con: 5.4 ± 0.6 IGT: 5.5 ± 0.6 | Con: 28.6 ± 3.0 IGT: 30.0 ± 3.4 | Con: 5.2 ± 1.3 Con: 1.6 ± 1.3 T2D: 5.3 ± 1.3 T2D: 1.9 ± 1.3 | 60 min/session 3‐time/week | 12 weeks | HbA1c, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, HOMA‐IR, insulin, 2‐h insulin, glucose, 2‐h glucose |
Abbreviation: M, male; F, female; Con, control; T2D, Type 2 diabetes; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; VO2max, maximal oxygen consumption; VO2peak, peak oxygen uptake; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; HOMA‐IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; NR, not reported.
2.4. Quality Assessment
The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, version 2.0 (RoB 2) [35]. The RoB 2 consists of five domains (1) bias arising from the randomization process; (2) bias due to deviations from intended interventions; (3) bias due to missing outcome data; (4) bias in measurement of the outcome; and (5) bias in selection of the reported result. The quality of each domain was rated as “low risk of bias,” “high risk of bias,” or “some concerns,” and labelled with green (+), red (−), or yellow (!), respectively. The quality of the trials was assessed by the two authors (S.C. and A.W.). Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third investigator (Y.L. and M.K.).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
We used Excel and RevMan 5.3 (Review Manager, the Cochrane collaboration) for data aggregation and analysis. One author was responsible for data collection, and another author was responsible for checking the extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus decision. The effect sizes between the Nordic walking and the control groups were compared using the mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and a forest plot was generated. Statistical differences were considered significant when the p value was less than 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. An I 2 value of less than 50% indicates low heterogeneity, and a fixed‐effects model was employed. If the I 2 value is greater than 50%, it indicates high heterogeneity, and a random‐effects model was employed. Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity if the heterogeneity value is more than 50%. Statistical power for each outcome was reported using R (version 4.4.3). Sensitivity analysis was performed using the “leave‐one‐study‐out” method to evaluate the robustness of the pooled effect estimates for all outcomes. In this analysis, we systematically removed one trial at a time and reanalyzed the data to observe the impact on overall significance.
3. Results
3.1. Qualitative Analysis
3.1.1. Summary of Search Results
Initially, we identified 205 studies through electronic databases, which include 32 from PubMed, 69 from Web of Science, 31 from the Cochrane, 36 from Scopus, and 37 from Embase. After removing the 86 duplicates, 119 studies remained. By reviewing the titles and abstracts, we excluded 97 studies, leaving 22 potential studies for inclusion. We then carefully reviewed the full text of the 22 studies and excluded 16 for the following reasons: five studies are not RCTs [22, 36–39], two studies employed Nordic walking with other interventions [40, 41], two studies are not on patients with Type 2 diabetes [42, 43], six studies reported no relevant outcomes [44–49], and one study had no comparable control group [50]. Finally, six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta‐analysis. The number of studies in each step was clearly presented in the PRISMA flow chart (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

PRISMA flow chart.
3.1.2. Characteristics of Included Studies and Participants
The included six RCTs comprising seven trials were published between 2010 and 2024. Five RCTs are from Europe, and one is from India. All trials investigated the effects of Nordic walking on individuals with prediabetes or diabetes, aiming to improve their health‐related outcomes. Among the six RCTs, five studies were designed as double‐arm RCTs [21, 31–34], and one study was designed as a multi‐arm RCT [20]. Overall, a total of 321 participants were enrolled in these studies, with 63% being male (male = 202, female = 119). The participants with prediabetes were 114, and the participants with diabetes were 207. The mean age of the participants was 58.63 years. Four studies were conducted on people with diabetes [31–34], one study conducted on both people with prediabetes and diabetes (independently) [20], and one study recruited only people with prediabetes [21]. The disease duration in patients with diabetes is more than 1 year. The Nordic walking intervention duration was 16‐week in two studies [20, 32] 12‐week in three studies [21, 33, 34], and 4‐week in one study [31]. Nordic walking session times ranged from 45‐ to 90‐min. Further characteristics of participants (baseline) and intervention protocol are presented in Table 1.
3.1.3. Risk of Bias Assessment
The risk of bias for the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool Version 2.0 (RoB 2) [35], and the results are summarized in Figure S1. Four of the included studies were assessed to have a low risk of bias for the “randomization process” [20, 21, 31, 33]. Although other studies reported the use of randomization, they did not provide sufficient methodological details, which may introduce a risk of selection bias. The included RCTs are judged to have either some concerns or a high risk of bias in the domain of “deviations from intended interventions.” All studies were judged to have a low risk of bias in the domains “missing outcome data” and “measurement of the outcome.” Four studies were assessed as having some concerns regarding the “selection of the reported results” [20, 31, 32, 34]. In general, the included RCTs exhibited a relatively low risk of bias for the “overall bias.”
3.2. Quantitative Analysis
3.2.1. Nordic Walking Decreases Body Weight, Not BMI and WC
The effect of Nordic walking on anthropometric variables in participants was assessed by meta‐analysis, and the results are presented in Figure 2. Changes in body weight were reported in four trials [20, 21, 32, 34], and the differences were compared between Nordic walking and control trials. The meta‐analysis results showed a significant reduction in body weight of participants following Nordic walking (Figure 2a; MD = −0.79 kg, 95% CI: −1.47 to −0.12, I 2 = 13%, p = 0.02, power = 80.5%). The changes in BMI were reported in four trials [20, 32–34], and we found no significant differences between Nordic walking and control trials (Figure 2b; MD = −0.10 kg/m2, 95% CI: −0.45 to 0.25, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.58, power = 8.5%). Next, we analyzed waist circumference (WC) data and found Nordic walking tended to decrease WC in participants (Figure 2c; MD = −0.82 cm, 95% CI: −1.71 to 0.06, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.07, power = 44.8%). Our meta‐analysis results indicate that Nordic walking produced a moderate but statistically significant weight reduction but was not effective in decreasing the BMI and WC of participants with prediabetes or diabetes. Furthermore, we calculated the percentage of weight loss for each study using baseline and postintervention values. We noticed that the percentage of weight loss in adults with prediabetes or diabetes is highly variable (0.5%–2.9%) across trials. This heterogeneity and smaller sample size may be attributed to the moderate magnitude of weight loss in our study (Table S3).
Figure 2.
Forest plot demonstrating the efficacy of Nordic walking on anthropometrics in adults with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes. (a) Body weight; (b) body mass index (BMI); and (c) waist circumference (WC). SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes.

(a)

(b)

(c)
3.2.2. Nordic Walking Decreases HbA1c
All included studies reported at least one diabetes indicator. To be specific, five studies (six trials) reported HbA1c [20, 21, 31–33], three studies (four trials) reported FBG [20, 21, 34], two studies (three trials) reported 2‐h glucose [20, 21], and two studies (three trials) reported HOMA‐IR [20, 21] data. The pooled meta‐analysis results showed that Nordic walking significantly reduced HbA1c levels in individuals with prediabetes or diabetes compared with the control (Figure 3a; MD = −0.37%, 95% CI = −0.56 to −0.18, I 2 = 69%, p = 0.0001, power = 97.1%). The decreased HbA1c with the Nordic walking, represented by a higher heterogeneity, indicates the involvement of confounding factors like age, baseline HbA1c, intervention duration, and body composition that could affect the outcome.
Figure 3.
Forest plot illustrating the efficacy of Nordic walking on glycemic control in adults with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes. (a) glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); (b) fasting blood glucose (FBG); (c) 2‐hour glucose; and (d) homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR). SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)
However, we found no significant differences between Nordic walking and control trials for FBG (Figure 3b; MD = 0.17 mg/dL, 95% CI = −0.03 to 0.38, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.10, power = 37.7%), 2‐h glucose (Figure 3c; MD = −0.26 mg/dL, 95% CI = −0.84 to 0.33, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.39, power = 13.8%), and HOMA‐IR (Figure 3d; MD = −0.15, 95% CI = −1.28 to 0.97, I 2 = 67%, p = 0.79, power = 5.8%). Our findings revealed that Nordic walking is effective in decreasing HbA1c; however, it did not affect blood glucose or HOMA‐IR in participants with prediabetes or diabetes.
3.2.3. Decreased HbA1c is Greater in Diabetes Than Prediabetes After Nordic Walking
Based on the HbA1c data, we categorized the trials into two subgroups, prediabetes and diabetes, and subgroup analysis was performed to determine the differential effects of Nordic walking on HbA1c. As shown in Figure 4, two trials comprising 53 individuals with prediabetes represented a significant reduction of HbA1c in the Nordic walking trial compared with control (Figure 4; MD = −0.2%, 95% CI = −0.32 to −0.08, p = 0.001). Next, the results of four trials involving 85 individuals with diabetes demonstrated a greater reduction of HbA1c with Nordic walking compared with control (Figure 4; MD = −0.49%, 95% CI = −0.70 to −0.28, p < 0.00001). The decreased HbA1c in individuals with diabetes (MD = −0.49%) appears to be greater than that of individuals with prediabetes (MD = −0.2%). The test for subgroup analysis results also revealed a statistically significant difference between prediabetes and diabetes subgroups (p = 0.02).
Figure 4.

Subgroup analysis of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). T2D, Type 2 diabetes; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.
3.2.4. Effect of Nordic Walking on Lipid Profile
The changes in lipid profile after Nordic walking were reported in four studies [20, 21, 32, 34], and the differences were compared with the control trial (Figure 5). Here, we emphasize that the Nordic walking intervention duration in all four studies was 12 weeks. Accordingly, the meta‐analysis results showed that the given duration of Nordic walking had no significant effects on TC (Figure 5a; MD = −0.07 m m o l/L, 95% CI = −0.32 to 0.18, I 2 = 67%, p = 0.58, power = 8.6%), TG (Figure 5b; MD = −0.11, 95% CI = −0.24 to 0.02, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.10, power = 37.8%), and LDL cholesterol levels (Figure 5c; MD = −0.10 mmol/L, 95% CI = −0.29 to 0.08, I 2 = 58%, p = 0.26, power = 20.3%) in patients with prediabetes or diabetes. However, the same duration of Nordic walking had a positive effect on HDL cholesterol, as we found significantly increased HDL levels (Figure 5d; MD = 0.07 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.12, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.005, power = 79.6%) in the participants.
Figure 5.
Forest plot demonstrating the efficacy of Nordic walking on lipid profile in adults with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes. (a) total cholesterol (TC); (b) triglycerides (TG); (c) low‐density lipoprotein (LDL); and (d) high‐density lipoprotein (HDL). SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)
3.2.5. Effect of Nordic Walking on Blood Pressure and VO2peak
Three studies reported changes in blood pressure with Nordic walking and compared them to a control group [20, 21, 32]. From our meta‐analysis results, we found no significant change in either SBP (Figure S2a; MD = 0.34 mmHg, 95% CI = −2.99 to 3.66, I 2 = 40%, p = 0.84, power = 5.5%) or diastolic blood pressure (Figure S2b; MD = 0.17 mmHg, 95% CI = −1.67 to 2.01, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.86, power = 5.4%) of participants with prediabetes or diabetes.
Of the six included studies, only one study with two trials reported VO2peak data of participants [20]. Our meta‐analysis found that Nordic walking intervention significantly increased peak oxygen uptake (Figure 6; MD = 2.12, 95% CI = 0.26–3.97, I 2 = 0%; p = 0.03, power = 60.9%) in participants with prediabetes or diabetes compared to the control.
Figure 6.

Forest plot demonstrating the effect of Nordic walking on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) in participants with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes. SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes.
3.3. Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the “leave‐one study‐out” method to assess the robustness of the pooled effects for all outcomes. Upon excluding the study by Venojärvi et al. [21], the significantly reduced body weight in the Nordic walking trial compared with the control became nonsignificant, suggesting the strong influence of this study. Removing a trial arm involving adults with prediabetes from the Fritz et al. study [20] resulted in a significant reduction in WC (p = 0.04), whilst removing the arm with diabetes from the same study [20] led to a significant reduction in HOMA‐IR (p = 0.03), which differed from the original pooled effect, suggesting the influence of baseline health status on these outcomes. Similarly, excluding the Gram et al. study [32] from the pooled analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in LDL cholesterol (p = 0.009). However, the pooled results for HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, and blood pressure remained robust and were unaffected by sensitivity analyses (Figures S3, S4, S5 and S6).
4. Discussion
Although previous reviews have indicated the beneficial effects of Nordic walking in populations with CVDs, respiratory diseases and Parkinson′s disease, its efficacy on clinical outcomes in populations with prediabetes or diabetes has not been systematically reviewed. This systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluated the effects of Nordic walking on anthropometrics, glycemic control, lipid profiles, blood pressure, and VO2peak in adults with prediabetes or diabetes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to synthesize the evidence using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Meta‐analysis results of six RCTs showed that Nordic walking significantly decreased body weight and HbA1c and increased HDL cholesterol and VO2peak in participants with prediabetes or diabetes compared with controls. Through the subgroup analysis, we found that the decrease in HbA1c in people with diabetes is greater than that of people with prediabetes. According to the pooled analysis, Nordic walking tends to decrease WC, but does not affect BMI, FBG, 2‐h glucose, and HOMA‐IR. In addition, Nordic walking appeared ineffective in influencing other cardiovascular risk factors, such as TC, TG, LDL, and blood pressure in the studied population. Overall, Nordic walking with a duration of 4‐ to 16‐week can promote weight loss and decrease HbA1c in people with diabetes or prediabetes (Figure 7).
Figure 7.

Nordic walking decreased body weight/HbA1c and improved HDL/VO2peak in adults with prediabetes or diabetes.
We found that the Nordic walking intervention led to a significant reduction in body weight and decreased tendency of WC compared with the control trial in participants with prediabetes or diabetes, whereas BMI remained unchanged. According to recent findings from RCTs, Nordic walking appears to be ineffective in decreasing BMI and WC in people with diabetes [22, 33]. Contrary, another RCT with 12‐week structured Nordic walking training reported decreased body weight and BMI in women with diabetes [34]. Our findings are consistent with a recent meta‐analysis of 22 RCTs, which reported the decreased body weight after Nordic walking in the elderly, aged 62 years [24]. In contrast, an earlier meta‐analysis of eight RCTs in 2020 concluded that Nordic walking, compared with control, did not affect the body weight and BMI of adults with overweight and obesity [28]. However, this meta‐analysis reported limitations of diverse health statuses of participants in some RCTs and a smaller sample size (n = 415) [28]. The duration of Nordic walking in our study and in the above‐mentioned two meta‐analyses ranged from 4‐ to 16‐week [24, 28]; however, the differential effect of Nordic walking on body weight and BMI may be attributed to the differences in health status of the participants. Studies have shown that weight loss in people with diabetes is strongly associated with improvement of diabetic complications [51, 52]. The decreased body weight after Nordic walking in middle‐aged men with prediabetes is associated with reduced adipose tissue mass and body fat percentage [21]. In addition, weight loss, including fat mass reduction, after exercise can help improve insulin sensitivity, hyperglycemia, or blood pressure in people with obesity or diabetes [53–55]. Although statistically significant weight loss was observed in our study, the magnitude is moderate, and the calculated percentage of weight loss did not exceed 3% across the included trials. This outcome suggests that the observed weight loss may not have produced a clinically significant benefit in the studied population. Existing evidence indicates that cardiovascular or metabolic benefits from weight loss interventions can be achieved with a weight loss of > 3% for improving glycemic control and TG, and at least 5% for improving blood pressure, HDL, and LDL cholesterol [56–59]. Nevertheless, Nordic walking remains a practical lifestyle intervention that could lead to substantial weight loss when combined with other strategies, such as dietary modification.
Patients with diabetes are advised to maintain a healthy lifestyle and keep their HbA1c levels below 7.0% to mitigate the disease‐associated complications [60, 61]. A noteworthy finding from our meta‐analysis is that Nordic walking substantially decreased HbA1c without significantly affecting short‐term glycemic markers, like FBG, 2‐h glucose, or HOMA‐IR. Although our findings suggest a unique beneficial effect of Nordic walking on long‐term glycemic control, the existing literature is inconsistent. For example, Venojärvi et al. reported that 12‐week Nordic walking (supervised) had no effect on HbA1c and blood glucose in overweight and obese men with prediabetes [21]. Similarly, a 16‐week Nordic walking (unsupervised) reported unchanged HbA1c in overweight/obese adults with prediabetes; however, decreased HbA1c was reported in overweight and obese adults with diabetes [20]. A recent RCT by Athwale and Shukla demonstrated that 4‐week Nordic walking (supervised) significantly reduced HbA1c in adults with diabetes [31]. These inconsistencies may be due to differences in baseline HbA1c levels and/or the health status of the participants. Regarding the results of meta‐analyses, one study included eight RCTs involving overweight and obese adults [28], and another recent study included 22 RCTs involving older adults [24], and both reported no significant decrease in HbA1c with Nordic walking compared with the control. The evidence from these two meta‐analyses appears consistent with unchanged HbA1c after Nordic walking, but it is not fully supported because the studied population is diverse. It is worth noting that no meta‐analysis synthesized the evidence to demonstrate the effects of Nordic walking on HbA1c in adults exclusively with prediabetes or diabetes.
HbA1c reflects integrated glycemic exposure over a 2‐ to 3‐month period, providing a stable and robust assessment of overall glycemic control. In contrast, FBG and HOMA‐IR are snapshot metrics susceptible to high daily variability from factors like recent diet or acute stress, which may obscure the true underlying effect of a chronic exercise intervention in a meta‐analysis context [62, 63]. Therefore, the significant reduction in HbA1c should be viewed as the primary indicator of the sustained metabolic benefits conferred by Nordic walking. In addition, we explored the efficacy of Nordic walking on HbA1c in people with different baseline HbA1c levels who were referred to prediabetes or diabetes. Subgroup analysis revealed that the decrease in HbA1c with Nordic walking is greater in the diabetes than in the prediabetes subgroup. This suggests a pronounced therapeutic response in individuals with poorer baseline glycemic control and thus a greater capacity for improvement following Nordic walking. This phenomenon is consistent with other exercise interventions, witnessing a greater improvement of glycemic control in patients with higher HbA1c or a longer history of diabetes [64, 65]. For patients with Type 2 diabetes, whose glucose metabolism pathways are impaired, the increased whole‐body muscle engagement and energy expenditure with Nordic walking [66], and increased GLUT4 protein or glycogen synthase activity with aerobic exercise [67], perhaps contributed to restoring glucose metabolism. Given the strong association between lower HbA1c levels and reduced cardiovascular events, the magnitude of HbA1c decrease (−0.49%, p = 0.00001) in patients with diabetes may contribute to cardiovascular benefits. Previous evidence reveals that each 1% reduction in HbA1c is associated with a 21% decrease in diabetes‐related deaths, a 37% decrease in microvascular complications, and a 14% reduction in myocardial infarction [68]. Achieving an HbA1c percentage below 7.0% in patients with diabetes leads to an absolute risk reduction of developing coronary heart disease (5%–10%) and all‐cause mortality [69]. Although the magnitude of HbA1c reduction in our study is moderate, Nordic walking remains effective in reducing HbA1c, particularly in adults with higher baseline values. Further studies with a large sample size are necessary to determine the optimal frequency, intensity, or duration of Nordic walking based on participants′ physical fitness and baseline HbA1c levels.
The “Standards of Care in Diabetes” by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that improving lipid profiles in diabetes through lifestyle modifications can reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) [70]. In our meta‐analysis, we found that Nordic walking significantly increased HDL in individuals with prediabetes or diabetes, whereas there were no significant changes in other lipid parameters, including TC, TG, and LDL. This observation is consistent with existing reports that showed HDL cholesterol is more responsive to aerobic exercise than TC, TG, or LDL in adults [71, 72]. An RCT conducted on individuals with obesity reported an increase in HDL cholesterol with aerobic exercise; however, TC, TG, and LDL cholesterol remained unchanged [73]. The unchanged non‐HDL parameters in our analysis may be associated with the differences in intensity or duration of the Nordic walking intervention. It has been suggested that a significant reduction in LDL and TG with exercise often necessitates a greater stimulus by a higher volume or higher intensity [74–76]. Vigorous physical activity with a higher frequency (3–6 times/week) increased HDL and decreased TG in adults, while a lower frequency (1–2 times/week) showed no effect on lipid profile [77]. Concurrently, a structured training protocol alone did not affect HDL, TC, or TG in male recreational athletes with diabetes. However, the training protocol combined with dietary intervention has been shown to improve HDL cholesterol [78]. The statistically significant increase in HDL observed in adults with prediabetes or diabetes after Nordic walking is likely clinically insignificant. Determining a clinically significant change in HDL is complex, as evidence for cardiovascular benefit from simply raising HDL is mixed [79]. According to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines, a clear and reproducible inverse relationship exists between HDL cholesterol and ASCVD risk, but there is no evidence from RCTs to suggest that increasing HDL reduces the risk of cardiovascular events [80]. Furthermore, the cardiovascular protection associated with HDL in the general population may not extend to individuals with metabolic diseases [81]. To optimize reductions in TC and TG, and improvements in HDL, Nordic walking protocols for individuals with prediabetes or diabetes should be personalized/tailored based on their baseline lipid profile.
Regarding blood pressure, our meta‐analysis did not find a statistically significant reduction in individuals with prediabetes or diabetes, although a trend towards a modest improvement was observed. This aligns with the findings of Sanchez‐Lastra et al. in overweight or obese populations [28], but contrasts with another meta‐analysis in older adults, where Nordic walking significantly lowered SBP [24]. Nordic walking for 6 months also decreased SBP but did not affect DBP in older adults with diabetes [22]. This discrepancy may be attributable to differences in population characteristics; for instance, the older adults in the study by Liu and Kim may have had higher baseline blood pressure, allowing for a greater magnitude of reduction [24]. Ultimately, definitive conclusions on the blood pressure‐lowering effects of Nordic walking in the diabetic population will require future trials with larger sample sizes and longer durations. In contrast to the blood pressure results, our analysis revealed a significant improvement in VO2peak after Nordic walking. This finding is critical, as VO2peak is a powerful and integrative measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, reflecting the coordinated efficiency of the cardiovascular, respiratory, and muscular systems [82]. Our results are supported by the evidence from RCT showing that 12‐week Nordic walking training can improve aerobic capacity by approximately 20% in middle‐aged men with prediabetes [21]. Similarly, another RCT with a 4‐week Nordic walking program has shown increased maximal aerobic capacity in patients with diabetes; however, the findings are limited by the shorter intervention duration [31]. Given that each one metabolic equivalent (≈3.5 mL/kg/min) increase in VO2peak is associated with a substantial reduction in CVD risk [82, 83], the improvement in VO2peak with Nordic walking may represent a profound health benefit for individuals with prediabetes or diabetes.
5. Limitations
Although our systematic review and meta‐analysis provide valuable insights into the beneficial effects of Nordic walking, we have a few limitations that should be acknowledged to guide future research. First, the limited number of RCTs and their small sample sizes resulted in insufficient statistical power for most outcomes, and therefore, the results should be interpreted cautiously. For instance, Nordic walking improves VO2peak in adults with prediabetes or diabetes; however, this finding was based on only two trials from a single study, which limits robustness and generalization. Due to the small number of included RCTs, we are unable to formally assess publication bias using the funnel plots and Egger′s test. Second, methodological variations across RCTs may have influenced the results. One RCT employed an unsupervised Nordic walking protocol that relied on self‐reported exercise intensity, which raises concerns about adherence accuracy, and its effect on outcomes, especially when compared with the supervised protocols used in other studies. Furthermore, variations in assessment methodologies for glycemic control, lipid profile, and blood pressure across RCTs may represent additional confounding factors that could influence the data. Finally, most participants in our analysis (5 of 6 RCTs) are from Europe; therefore, our findings may not be generalizable to populations from other regions. Given the potential differences in genetic backgrounds, dietary habits, and lifestyles across ethnicities, the effects of Nordic walking on clinical outcomes may differ in other populations. Further studies are necessary to confirm the efficiency of Nordic walking on populations from a wider range of regions or ethnicities.
6. Conclusion
Our findings demonstrated the beneficial effects of Nordic walking intervention on glycemic control (particularly on HbA1c) and weight management in adults with prediabetes or diabetes. These findings underscore the clinical significance of incorporating Nordic walking as an effective lifestyle intervention for the prevention and management of diabetes. However, further studies are necessary to explore the precise physiological adaptations to Nordic walking and how these adaptations could promote anthropometrics, glycemia, and lipid profile in adults with prediabetes or diabetes.
Disclosure
All authors thoroughly reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author Contributions
Sichao Chen, Weibing Ye, and Mallikarjuna Korivi designed the study. Sichao Chen, Xiaohong An, Ankang Wu, and Yubo Liu performed the literature search and study selection. Sichao Chen, Xiaohong An, and Ankang Wu extracted data, performed statistical analyses, and drafted the original manuscript. Veeranjaneya Reddy Lebaka and Bhaskar LVKS provided additional insights into the data and manuscript. Mallikarjuna Korivi, Weibing Ye, and Yubo Liu reviewed the data and results. Mallikarjuna Korivi and Weibing Ye revised and finalized the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by Zhejiang Province Maker Space Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Project: FiveAspect Intelligent Training: Technology‐Empowered Running Service.
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.
Supporting information
Supporting Information 1 Table S1: PRISMA checklist.
Supporting Information 2 Table S2: Detailed search strategy on electronic databases. Table S3: Percentage of weight loss in each study. NR, not reported; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S1: Risk of bias (RoB2) assessment for included studies. Figure S2: Forest plot demonstrating the efficacy of Nordic walking on blood pressure in adults with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes. (a) systolic blood pressure (SBP); and (b) diastolic blood pressure (DBP). SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S3 Sensitivity analysis for body composition. BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; MD, mean difference; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S4 Sensitivity analysis for glycemic control. HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; FBG, fasting blood glucose; MD, mean difference; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S5 Sensitivity analysis for lipid profile. TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; MD, mean difference; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S6 Sensitivity analysis for blood pressure. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MD, mean difference; T2D, Type 2 diabetes; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance.
Chen, Sichao , An, Xiaohong , Wu, Ankang , Liu, Yubo , Lebaka, Veeranjaneya Reddy , LVKS, Bhaskar , Korivi, Mallikarjuna , Ye, Weibing , Effect of Nordic Walking on Anthropometrics, Glycemia, and Lipid Profile in Adults With Prediabetes or Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, Journal of Diabetes Research, 2026, 5886930, 16 pages, 2026. 10.1155/jdr/5886930
Guest Editor: Zhixin Li
Contributor Information
Mallikarjuna Korivi, Email: mallik@zjnu.edu.cn.
Weibing Ye, Email: ywbls@zjnu.cn.
Zhixin Li, Email: umlizx@umich.edu.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed used in this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
- 1. Echouffo-Tcheugui J. B., Perreault L., Ji L., and Dagogo-Jack S., Diagnosis and Management of Prediabetes: A Review, JAMA. (2023) 329, no. 14, 1206–1216, 10.1001/jama.2023.4063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. American Diabetes Association, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Care. (2014) 37, no. supplement_1, S81–S90, 10.2337/dc14-S081, 2-s2.0-84892659350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Diabetes Mellitus, Fasting Blood Glucose Concentration, and Risk of Vascular Disease: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of 102 Prospective Studies, Lancet. (2010) 375, no. 9733, 2215–2222, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9, 2-s2.0-77953821528, 20609967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Huang Y., Cai X., Mai W., Li M., and Hu Y., Association Between Prediabetes and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and All Cause Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, BMJ. (2016) 355, i5953, 10.1136/bmj.i5953, 2-s2.0-84998892200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. International Diabetes Federation, IDF Diabetes Atlas 11th Edition, https://diabetesatlas.org/.
- 6. Wilmot E. G., Edwardson C. L., Achana F. A., Davies M. J., Gorely T., Gray L. J., Khunti K., Yates T., and Biddle S. J., Sedentary Time in Adults and the Association With Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease and Death: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Diabetologia. (2012) 55, no. 11, 2895–2905, 10.1007/s00125-012-2677-z, 2-s2.0-84867578963, 22890825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Venables M. C. and Jeukendrup A. E., Physical Inactivity and Obesity: Links With Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. (2009) 25, no. S1, S18–S23, 10.1002/dmrr.983, 2-s2.0-73349134634, 19662619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mekary R. A., Giovannucci E., Willett W. C., van Dam R. M., and Hu F. B., Eating Patterns and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Men: Breakfast Omission, Eating Frequency, and Snacking, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. (2012) 95, no. 5, 1182–1189, 10.3945/ajcn.111.028209, 2-s2.0-84860295264, 22456660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zhu P., Lao G., Li H., Tan R., Gu J., and Ran J., Replacing of Sedentary Behavior With Physical Activity and the Risk of Mortality in People With Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. (2023) 20, no. 1, 10.1186/s12966-023-01488-0, 37415151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Knowler W. C., Barrett-Connor E., Fowler S. E., Hamman R. F., Lachin J. M., Walker E. A., Nathan D. M., and Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes With Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin, New England Journal of Medicine. (2002) 346, no. 6, 393–403, 10.1056/NEJMoa012512, 2-s2.0-0037034257, 11832527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hohberg V., Lichtenstein E., Kreppke J. N., Zanitti C., Streckmann F., Gerber M., and Faude O., Effects of Lifestyle Interventions to Promote Physical Activity on Physical Activity and Glycated Hemoglobin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Sports Medicine. (2025) 55, no. 5, 1165–1181, 10.1007/s40279-025-02184-8, 40080359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Rowan C. P., Riddell M. C., Gledhill N., and Jamnik V. K., Aerobic Exercise Training Modalities and Prediabetes Risk Reduction, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. (2017) 49, no. 3, 403–412, 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001135, 2-s2.0-84992365698, 27776003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yang Z., Scott C. A., Mao C., Tang J., and Farmer A. J., Resistance Exercise Versus Aerobic Exercise for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Sports Medicine. (2014) 44, no. 4, 487–499, 10.1007/s40279-013-0128-8, 2-s2.0-84897376519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Miele E. M. and Headley S. A. E., The Effects of Chronic Aerobic Exercise on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Persons With Diabetes Mellitus, Current Diabetes Reports. (2017) 17, no. 10, 10.1007/s11892-017-0927-7, 2-s2.0-85029514670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chao M., Wang C., Dong X., and Ding M., The Effects of Tai Chi on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Diabetes Research. (2018) 2018, 7350567, 10.1155/2018/7350567, 2-s2.0-85059391093, 30116744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tschentscher M., Niederseer D., and Niebauer J., Health Benefits of Nordic Walking: A Systematic Review, American Journal of Preventive Medicine. (2013) 44, no. 1, 76–84, 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.043, 2-s2.0-84871294304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cugusi L., Manca A., Yeo T. J., Bassareo P. P., Mercuro G., and Kaski J. C., Nordic Walking for Individuals With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. (2017) 24, no. 18, 1938–1955, 10.1177/2047487317738592, 2-s2.0-85035040064, 29067853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Oakley C., Zwierska I., Tew G., Beard J. D., and Saxton J. M., Nordic Poles Immediately Improve Walking Distance in Patients With Intermittent Claudication, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. (2008) 36, no. 6, 689–694, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.036, 2-s2.0-56049091457, 18835794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Bullo V., Gobbo S., Vendramin B., Duregon F., Cugusi L., Di Blasio A., Bocalini D. S., Zaccaria M., Bergamin M., and Ermolao A., Nordic Walking Can Be Incorporated in the Exercise Prescription to Increase Aerobic Capacity, Strength, and Quality of Life for Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Rejuvenation Research. (2018) 21, no. 2, 141–161, 10.1089/rej.2017.1921, 2-s2.0-85045663487, 28756746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Fritz T., Caidahl K., Krook A., Lundstrom P., Mashili F., Osler M., Szekeres F. L., Ostenson C. G., Wandell P., and Zierath J. R., Effects of Nordic Walking on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Overweight Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes, Impaired or Normal Glucose Tolerance, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. (2013) 29, no. 1, 25–32, 10.1002/dmrr.2321, 2-s2.0-84872222634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Venojärvi M., Wasenius N., Manderoos S., Heinonen O. J., Hernelahti M., Lindholm H., Surakka J., Lindstrom J., Aunola S., Atalay M., and Eriksson J. G., Nordic Walking Decreased Circulating Chemerin and Leptin Concentrations in Middle-Aged Men With Impaired Glucose Regulation, Annals of Medicine. (2013) 45, no. 2, 162–170, 10.3109/07853890.2012.727020, 2-s2.0-84873372246, 23110613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Della Guardia L., Carnevale Pellino V., Filipas L., Bonato M., Gallo G., Lovecchio N., Vandoni M., and Codella R., Nordic Walking Improves Cardiometabolic Parameters, Fitness Performance, and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes, Endocrine Practice. (2023) 29, no. 2, 135–140, 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.11.007, 36400400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nagendrababu V., Duncan H. F., and Dummer P. M. H., Research That Matters: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, International Endodontic Journal. (2020) 53, no. 4, 437–439, 10.1111/iej.13272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liu J. and Kim J. H., The Effects of Nordic Walking on the Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. (2025) 129, 105663, 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105663, 39476525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dhamayanti A. S., Rahmad R., Rachmawati S., and Waranugraha Y., A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nordic Walking for Chronic Heart Failure With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, PM&R. (2025) 17, no. 2, 210–221, 10.1002/pmrj.13254, 39215750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Vilanova-Pereira M., Barral-Fernández M., Labata-Lezaun N., Llurda-Almuzara L., Pérez-Bellmunt A., Jácome C., and Lista-Paz A., Effects of Nordic Walking in People With Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. (2025) 57, jrm43090, 10.2340/jrm.v57.43090, 40947882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Salse-Batán J., Sanchez-Lastra M. A., Suarez-Iglesias D., Varela S., and Ayán C., Effects of Nordic Walking in People with Parkinson′s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Health & Social Care in the Community. (2022) 30, no. 5, e1505–e1520, 10.1111/hsc.13842, 35593147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sanchez-Lastra M. A., Miller K. J., Martinez-Lemos R. I., Giraldez A., and Ayan C., Nordic Walking for Overweight and Obese People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Journal of Physical Activity and Health. (2020) 17, no. 7, 762–772, 10.1123/jpah.2019-0357, 32502974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tabak A. G., Herder C., Rathmann W., Brunner E. J., and Kivimaki M., Prediabetes: A High-Risk State for Diabetes Development, Lancet. (2012) 379, no. 9833, 2279–2290, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60283-9, 2-s2.0-84862302432, 22683128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Page M. J., Moher D., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D., Shamseer L., Tetzlaff J. M., Akl E. A., Brennan S. E., Chou R., Glanville J., Grimshaw J. M., Hrobjartsson A., Lalu M. M., Li T., Loder E. W., Mayo-Wilson E., McDonald S., McGuinness L. A., Stewart L. A., Thomas J., Tricco A. C., Welch V. A., Whiting P., and McKenzie J. E., Prisma 2020 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews, BMJ. (2021) 372, n160, 10.1136/bmj.n160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Athwale R. M. and Shukla M. P., Effect of Supervised Nordic Walking on Glycemic Control and Maximal Aerobic Capacity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial, European Journal of Physiotherapy. (2025) 27, no. 2, 106–111, 10.1080/21679169.2024.2354199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gram B., Christensen R., Christiansen C., and Gram J., Effects of Nordic Walking and Exercise in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. (2010) 20, no. 5, 355–361, 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181e56e0a, 2-s2.0-77957283316, 20818193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Jabardo-Camprubí G., Puig-Ribera A., Donat-Roca R., Farrés-Godayol P., Nazar-Gonzalez S., Sitjà-Rabert M., Espelt A., and Bort-Roig J., Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Primary Care Socio-Ecological Approach to Improve Physical Activity Adherence Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: The Senwi Project, Healthcare (Basel). (2023) 11, no. 13, 10.3390/healthcare11131815, 37444649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sentinelli F., La Cava V., Serpe R., Boi A., Incani M., Manconi E., Solinas A., Cossu E., Lenzi A., and Baroni M. G., Positive Effects of Nordic Walking on Anthropometric and Metabolic Variables in Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Science & Sports. (2015) 30, no. 1, 25–32, 10.1016/j.scispo.2014.10.005, 2-s2.0-84924761359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Sterne J. A. C., Savovic J., Page M. J., Elbers R. G., Blencowe N. S., Boutron I., Cates C. J., Cheng H. Y., Corbett M. S., Eldridge S. M., Emberson J. R., Hernan M. A., Hopewell S., Hrobjartsson A., Junqueira D. R., Juni P., Kirkham J. J., Lasserson T., Li T., McAleenan A., Reeves B. C., Shepperd S., Shrier I., Stewart L. A., Tilling K., White I. R., Whiting P. F., and Higgins J. P. T., Rob 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials, BMJ. (2019) 366, l4898, 10.1136/bmj.l4898, 2-s2.0-85071628750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Vehi C., Falces C., Sarlat M. A., Gonzalo A., Andrea R., and Sitges M., Nordic Walking for Cardiovascular Prevention in Patients With Ischaemic Heart Disease or Metabolic Syndrome, Medicina Clínica. (2016) 147, no. 12, 537–539, 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.09.041, 2-s2.0-85006176762, 27871767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fiodorenko-Dumas Z., Dumas I., Mastej K., and Adamiec R., Physical Activity-Related Changes in Adma and Vwf Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Preliminary Study, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. (2017) 26, no. 4, 601–608, 10.17219/acem/62663, 2-s2.0-85026444308, 28691426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kawamoto R., Katoh T., Ninomiya D., Kumagi T., Abe M., and Kohara K., Synergistic Association of Changes in Serum Uric Acid and Triglycerides With Changes in Insulin Resistance After Walking Exercise in Community-Dwelling Older Women, Endocrine Research. (2016) 41, no. 2, 116–123, 10.3109/07435800.2015.1094085, 2-s2.0-84952786766, 26727147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Torri A., Volpato E., Merati G., Milani M., Toccafondi A., Formenti D., La Rosa F., Agostini S., Agliardi C., Oreni L., Sacco A., Rescaldani M., Lucreziotti S., Giglio A., Ferrante G., Barbaro M., Montalto C., Buratti S., and Morici N., The Venere Study: Effectiveness of a Rehabilitation Treatment With Nordic Walking in Obese or Overweight Diabetic Patients with Cardiovascular Disease, CJC Open. (2024) 6, no. 5, 735–744, 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.01.002, 38846444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Neumayr G., Engler C., Lunger L., and Lechleitner P., Effects of a One-Week Vacation With Various Activity Programs on Metabolism and Adipokines, International Journal of Sports Medicine. (2021) 42, no. 8, 703–707, 10.1055/a-1297-4669, 33260249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ploydang T., Khovidhunkit W., Tanaka H., and Suksom D., Nordic Walking in Water on Cerebrovascular Reactivity and Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. (2023) 55, no. 10, 1803–1811, 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003216, 37204017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Rebryna A. A., Karpiuk I. Y., Obeziuk T. K., Lyakhova N. A., Yefimova A. I., Rastorguyeva I. S., and Kara S. I., Features of Physical Therapy of People With Endocrine System Pathology, Acta Balneologica. (2022) 64, no. 2, 133–137, 10.36740/ABal202202106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kantorowicz M., Szymura J., Szygula Z., Kusmierczyk J., Maciejczyk M., and Wiecek M., Nordic Walking at Maximal Fat Oxidation Intensity Decreases Circulating Asprosin and Visceral Obesity in Women with Metabolic Disorders, Frontiers in Physiology. (2021) 12, 726783, 10.3389/fphys.2021.726783, 34539448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Venojarvi M., Korkmaz A., Wasenius N., Manderoos S., Heinonen O. J., Lindholm H., Aunola S., Eriksson J. G., and Atalay M., 12 Weeks′ Aerobic and Resistance Training Without Dietary Intervention Did Not Influence Oxidative Stress but Aerobic Training Decreased Atherogenic Index in Middle-Aged Men With Impaired Glucose Regulation, Food and Chemical Toxicology. (2013) 61, 127–135, 10.1016/j.fct.2013.04.015, 2-s2.0-84888835089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Fritz T., Caidahl K., Osler M., Ostenson C. G., Zierath J. R., and Wandell P., Effects of Nordic Walking on Health-Related Quality of Life in Overweight Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Impaired or Normal Glucose Tolerance, Diabetic Medicine. (2011) 28, no. 11, 1362–1372, 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03348.x, 2-s2.0-80054714692, 21658122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Özdamar M., Kiliç Erkek Ö., Tümkaya S., Özdamar H. Ç., Özdamar A., Pakyürek H., Tunç-Ata M., Şenol H., Kiliç Toprak E., and Küçükatay Z., Examination of the Effectiveness of 12-Week Nordic Walking Exercise in Prediabetic Individuals, Pamukkale Medical Journal. (2022) 15, no. 2, 285–301, 10.31362/patd.1012513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Gidlund E. K., von Walden F., Venojarvi M., Riserus U., Heinonen O. J., Norrbom J., and Sundberg C. J., Humanin Skeletal Muscle Protein Levels Increase After Resistance Training in Men With Impaired Glucose Metabolism, Physiological Reports. (2016) 4, no. 23, e13063, 10.14814/phy2.13063, 2-s2.0-85014475805, 27923980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Du X., Zhang C., Zhang X., Qi Z., Cheng S., and Le S., The Impact of Nordic Walking on Bone Properties in Postmenopausal Women with Pre-Diabetes and Non-Alcohol Fatty Liver Disease, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. (2021) 18, no. 14, 10.3390/ijerph18147570, 34300021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ring M., Eriksson M. J., Fritz T., Nyberg G., Ostenson C. G., Krook A., Zierath J. R., and Caidahl K., Influence of Physical Activity and Gender on Arterial Function in Type 2 Diabetes, Normal and Impaired Glucose Tolerance, Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research. (2015) 12, no. 5, 315–324, 10.1177/1479164115588548, 2-s2.0-84938683774, 26092821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Pippi R., Di Blasio A., Aiello C., Fanelli C., Bullo V., Gobbo S., Cugusi L., and Bergamin M., Effects of a Supervised Nordic Walking Program on Obese Adults With and Without Type 2 Diabetes: The C.U.R.I.A.Mo. Centre Experience, Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. (2020) 5, no. 3, 10.3390/jfmk5030062, 33467277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Scheen A. J. and Van Gaal L. F., Combating the Dual Burden: Therapeutic Targeting of Common Pathways in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes, Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology. (2014) 2, no. 11, 911–922, 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70004-X, 2-s2.0-84901849274, 24731666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Wing R. R., Lang W., Wadden T. A., Safford M., Knowler W. C., Bertoni A. G., Hill J. O., Brancati F. L., Peters A., Wagenknecht L., and the Look AHEAD Research Group, Benefits of Modest Weight Loss in Improving Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Overweight and Obese Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes, Diabetes Care. (2011) 34, no. 7, 1481–1486, 10.2337/dc10-2415, 2-s2.0-79960969194, 21593294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Duncan G. E., Perri M. G., Theriaque D. W., Hutson A. D., Eckel R. H., and Stacpoole P. W., Exercise Training, Without Weight Loss, Increases Insulin Sensitivity and Postheparin Plasma Lipase Activity in Previously Sedentary Adults, Diabetes Care. (2003) 26, no. 3, 557–562, 10.2337/diacare.26.3.557, 2-s2.0-0042093749, 12610001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Ross R., Janssen I., Dawson J., Kungl A. M., Kuk J. L., Wong S. L., Nguyen-Duy T. B., Lee S., Kilpatrick K., and Hudson R., Exercise-Induced Reduction in Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Obesity Research. (2004) 12, no. 5, 789–798, 10.1038/oby.2004.95, 2-s2.0-4644229516, 15166299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Cui T., Sun Y., Ye W., Liu Y., and Korivi M., Efficacy of Time Restricted Eating and Resistance Training on Body Composition and Mood Profiles Among Young Adults With Overweight/Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. (2025) 22, no. 1, 2481127, 10.1080/15502783.2025.2481127, 40108888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sun Y., Liu Y., Ye W., Lebaka V. R., Chenji V., Li W., and Korivi M., Efficiency of Time-Restricted Eating and Energy Restriction on Anthropometrics and Body Composition in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. (2025) 22, no. 1, 10.1186/s12966-025-01812-w, 41034862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Williamson D. A., Bray G. A., and Ryan D. H., Is 5% Weight Loss a Satisfactory Criterion to Define Clinically Significant Weight Loss?, Obesity (Silver Spring). (2015) 23, no. 12, 2319–2320, 10.1002/oby.21358, 2-s2.0-84955177742, 26523739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Jensen M. D., Ryan D. H., Apovian C. M., Ard J. D., Comuzzie A. G., Donato K. A., Hu F. B., Hubbard V. S., Jakicic J. M., Kushner R. F., Loria C. M., Millen B. E., Nonas C. A., Pi-Sunyer F. X., Stevens J., Stevens V. J., Wadden T. A., Wolfe B. M., Yanovski S. Z., Jordan H. S., Kendall K. A., Lux L. J., Mentor-Marcel R., Morgan L. C., Trisolini M. G., Wnek J., Anderson J. L., Halperin J. L., Albert N. M., Bozkurt B., Brindis R. G., Curtis L. H., DeMets D., Hochman J. S., Kovacs R. J., Ohman E. M., Pressler S. J., Sellke F. W., Shen W. K., Smith S. C.Jr., and Tomaselli G. F., 2013 AHA/ACC/Tos Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society, Circulation. (2014) 129, no. 25 supplement 2, S102–S138, 10.1161/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee, 2-s2.0-84903133961, 24222017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Anderson J. W., Konz E. C., Frederich R. C., and Wood C. L., Long-Term Weight-Loss Maintenance: A Meta-Analysis of US Studies, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. (2001) 74, no. 5, 579–584, 10.1093/ajcn/74.5.579, 11684524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sherwani S. I., Khan H. A., Ekhzaimy A., Masood A., and Sakharkar M. K., Significance of HbA1c Test in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Diabetic Patients, Biomarker Insights. (2016) 11, 95–104, 10.4137/BMI.S38440, 2-s2.0-84984799169, 27398023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Liu Y., Ye W., Chen Q., Zhang Y., Kuo C. H., and Korivi M., Resistance Exercise Intensity Is Correlated With Attenuation of HbA1c and Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. (2019) 16, no. 1, 10.3390/ijerph16010140, 2-s2.0-85059796013, 30621076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Ketema E. B. and Kibret K. T., Correlation of Fasting and Postprandial Plasma Glucose With HbA1c in Assessing Glycemic Control; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Archives of Public Health. (2015) 73, no. 1, 10.1186/s13690-015-0088-6, 2-s2.0-84942155603, 26413295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Grace A., Chan E., Giallauria F., Graham P. L., and Smart N. A., Clinical Outcomes and Glycaemic Responses to Different Aerobic Exercise Training Intensities in Type II Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Cardiovascular Diabetology. (2017) 16, no. 1, 10.1186/s12933-017-0518-6, 2-s2.0-85015609602, 28292300. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Gallardo-Gomez D., Salazar-Martinez E., Alfonso-Rosa R. M., Ramos-Munell J., Del Pozo-Cruz J., Del Pozo Cruz B., and Alvarez-Barbosa F., Optimal Dose and Type of Physical Activity to Improve Glycemic Control in People Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Diabetes Care. (2024) 47, no. 2, 295–303, 10.2337/dc23-0800, 38241499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Michishita R., Shono N., Kasahara T., and Tsuruta T., Effects of Low Intensity Exercise Therapy on Early Phase Insulin Secretion in Overweight Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. (2008) 82, no. 3, 291–297, 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.08.013, 2-s2.0-55549146772, 18922594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Hansen E. A. and Smith G., Energy Expenditure and Comfort During Nordic Walking With Different Pole Lengths, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. (2009) 23, no. 4, 1187–1194, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819f1e2b, 2-s2.0-70350507699, 19528847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Christ-Roberts C. Y., Pratipanawatr T., Pratipanawatr W., Berria R., Belfort R., Kashyap S., and Mandarino L. J., Exercise Training Increases Glycogen Synthase Activity and Glut4 Expression but Not Insulin Signaling in Overweight Nondiabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Subjects, Metabolism. (2004) 53, no. 9, 1233–1242, 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.03.022, 2-s2.0-4344634365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Stratton I. M., Adler A. I., Neil H. A., Matthews D. R., Manley S. E., Cull C. A., Hadden D., Turner R. C., and Holman R. R., Association of Glycaemia With Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective Observational Study, BMJ. (2000) 321, no. 7258, 405–412, 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405, 10938048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. ten Brinke R., Dekker N., de Groot M., and Ikkersheim D., Lowering HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetics Results in Reduced Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and All-Cause Mortality, Primary Care Diabetes. (2008) 2, no. 1, 45–49, 10.1016/j.pcd.2007.12.004, 2-s2.0-40149097892, 18684420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 17. Diabetes Advocacy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025, Diabetes Care. (2025) 48, no. supplement_1, S335–S336, 10.2337/dc25-S017, 39651979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Leon A. S. and Sanchez O. A., Response of Blood Lipids to Exercise Training Alone or Combined With Dietary Intervention, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. (2001) 33, no. supplement, S502–S515, 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Stanton K. M., Kienzle V., Dinnes D. L. M., Kotchetkov I., Jessup W., Kritharides L., Celermajer D. S., and Rye K. A., Moderate- and High-Intensity Exercise Improves Lipoprotein Profile and Cholesterol Efflux Capacity in Healthy Young Men, Journal of the American Heart Association. (2022) 11, no. 12, e023386, 10.1161/JAHA.121.023386, 35699182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Banz W. J., Maher M. A., Thompson W. G., Bassett D. R., Moore W., Ashraf M., Keefer D. J., and Zemel M. B., Effects of Resistance Versus Aerobic Training on Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors, Journal of Experimental Biology Medicine. (2003) 228, no. 4, 434–440, 10.1177/153537020322800414, 2-s2.0-0141792625, 12671188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Kraus W. E., Houmard J. A., Duscha B. D., Knetzger K. J., Wharton M. B., McCartney J. S., Bales C. W., Henes S., Samsa G. P., Otvos J. D., Kulkarni K. R., and Slentz C. A., Effects of the Amount and Intensity of Exercise on Plasma Lipoproteins, New England Journal of Medicine. (2002) 347, no. 19, 1483–1492, 10.1056/NEJMoa020194, 2-s2.0-0037038239, 12421890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Mann S., Beedie C., and Jimenez A., Differential Effects of Aerobic Exercise, Resistance Training and Combined Exercise Modalities on Cholesterol and the Lipid Profile: Review, Synthesis and Recommendations, Sports Medicine. (2014) 44, no. 2, 211–221, 10.1007/s40279-013-0110-5, 2-s2.0-84894210414, 24174305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Franczyk B., Gluba-Brzózka A., Ciałkowska-Rysz A., Ławiński J., and Rysz J., The Impact of Aerobic Exercise on HDL Quantity and Quality: A Narrative Review, International Journal of Molecular Sciences. (2023) 24, no. 5, 10.3390/ijms24054653, 36902082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Kwon H. J. and Lee H. J., Effect of Vigorous Physical Activity on Blood Lipid and Glucose, Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. (2017) 13, no. 6, 653–658, 10.12965/jer.1735150.575, 2-s2.0-85043691232, 29326897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Chouk K., Triki R., Dergaa I., Ceylan H. İ., Bougrine H., Raul-Ioan M., and Ben Abderrahman A., Effects of Combined Diet and Physical Activity on Glycemic Control and Body Composition in Male Recreational Athletes With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Frontiers in Endocrinology. (2025) 16, 10.3389/fendo.2025.1525559, 40547524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Dastmalchi L. N., German C. A., and Taub P. R., High Density Lipoprotein: When to Rethink Too Much of a Good Thing, American Journal of Preventive Cardiology. (2023) 15, 100511, 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100511, 37434863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Mach F., Baigent C., Catapano A. L., Koskinas K. C., Casula M., Badimon L., Chapman M. J., De Backer G. G., Delgado V., Ference B. A., Graham I. M., Halliday A., Landmesser U., Mihaylova B., Pedersen T. R., Riccardi G., Richter D. J., Sabatine M. S., Taskinen M. R., Tokgozoglu L., and Wiklund O., 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias: Lipid Modification to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk, European Heart Journal. (2020) 41, no. 1, 111–188, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455, 31504418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Trimarco V., Izzo R., Morisco C., Mone P., Virginia Manzi M., Falco A., Pacella D., Gallo P., Lembo M., Santulli G., and Trimarco B., High HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) Cholesterol Increases Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertensive Patients, Hypertension. (2022) 79, no. 10, 2355–2363, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19912, 35968698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Letnes J. M., Dalen H., Vesterbekkmo E. K., Wisloff U., and Nes B. M., Peak Oxygen Uptake and Incident Coronary Heart Disease in a Healthy Population: The Hunt Fitness Study, European Heart Journal. (2019) 40, no. 20, 1633–1639, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy708, 2-s2.0-85064266522, 30496487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Laukkanen J. A., Kurl S., Salonen R., Rauramaa R., and Salonen J. T., The Predictive Value of Cardiorespiratory Fitness for Cardiovascular Events in Men With Various Risk Profiles: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study, European Heart Journal. (2004) 25, no. 16, 1428–1437, 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.013, 2-s2.0-4043082873, 15321701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information 1 Table S1: PRISMA checklist.
Supporting Information 2 Table S2: Detailed search strategy on electronic databases. Table S3: Percentage of weight loss in each study. NR, not reported; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S1: Risk of bias (RoB2) assessment for included studies. Figure S2: Forest plot demonstrating the efficacy of Nordic walking on blood pressure in adults with prediabetes or Type 2 diabetes. (a) systolic blood pressure (SBP); and (b) diastolic blood pressure (DBP). SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S3 Sensitivity analysis for body composition. BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; MD, mean difference; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S4 Sensitivity analysis for glycemic control. HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; FBG, fasting blood glucose; MD, mean difference; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S5 Sensitivity analysis for lipid profile. TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; MD, mean difference; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; T2D, Type 2 diabetes. Figure S6 Sensitivity analysis for blood pressure. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MD, mean difference; T2D, Type 2 diabetes; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed used in this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
