Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 14;113(4):412–417. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7436

Table 2.

Associations between ETS and daily urinary PdG and E1C levels.

Crude
Adjusted
Levels (pg/mL) β SE p-Value β SE p-Value
Nonconception cycles
 Daily urinary log(E1C) –0.44 0.08 < 0.001 –0.43 0.08 < 0.001
 Daily urinary log(PdG) –0.08 0.15 0.600 –0.07 0.15 0.637
Conception cycles
 Daily urinary log(E1C) –0.14 0.09 0.09 –0.17 0.10 0.085
 Daily urinary log(PdG) –0.07 0.14 0.654 –0.10 0.12 0.408

Sample size: nonconception cycles, 6,880 days (344 cycles); conception cycles, 6,580 days (329 cycles). Twenty indicator variables were created to represent each day in the 20-day window and were put in the adjusted models along with other covariates: age, age squared, BMI, BMI squared, education (high/middle), shift work (yes/no), stress (low, moderate, high), noise exposure (low, middle, high), and dust exposure (low, middle, high). All models used the GEE method to adjust for intrawoman correlation in cycles. Among the other covariates, shift work was found to be associated with a lower log(E1C) levels (β= –0.25, SE = 0.12, p = 0.025); all other covariates were nonsignificant.