Abstract
Microwave ablation (MWA) is a minimally invasive thermal ablation technique that eradicates thyroid tumors by rapidly increasing tissue temperature to 60–100 degrees Celsius (°C) through dielectric hysteresis. This focused electromagnetic heating leads to irreversible protein denaturation, cell membrane disruption, and coagulative necrosis. Within the ablation zone, mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum sustain severe thermal injury accompanied by DNA double-strand breaks. The resulting cell death occurs via apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis, while necrotic tissue triggers a robust inflammatory response that facilitates debris clearance and tissue remodeling. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and heat shock proteins (HSPs), released from dying cells, mediate immunogenic cell death (ICD) and promote dendritic cell activation and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses, leading to systemic antitumor immunity. Moreover, thermal injury disrupts the local vasculature, resulting in transient ischemia and hypoxia that activate the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) pathway and stimulate vascular repair and fibrosis through transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling. In addition, peripheral immune alterations and immune-related gene activation suggest potential synergy between MWA and immune checkpoint blockade. Collectively, MWA not only provides effective local tumor destruction but also reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment, offering a rationale for combined thermal and immunotherapeutic strategies in thyroid oncology.
Keywords: microwave ablation, thyroid tumors, papillary thyroid carcinoma, biological mechanisms, immunomodulation
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Thyroid cancer is the most common malignancy of the endocrine system and accounts for approximately 3.1% of all cancer cases worldwide.1 Among its subtypes, papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the predominant form of differentiated thyroid cancer, representing 80 to 85% of all thyroid malignancies.2,3 Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) has emerged as a major subtype and now represents nearly half of all PTC cases.4 With the global increase in PTMC incidence, ultrasound-guided minimally invasive therapies (MITs) have become effective alternatives to conventional thyroidectomy. Compared with surgery, these image-guided approaches are associated with favorable safety profiles, cosmetic outcomes, and quality-of-life advantages, and have been increasingly adopted for local tumor control.4,5 Microwave ablation (MWA), one of the most common MIT techniques, has been validated as a safe and effective treatment for PTMC. Clinical studies have reported complication rates as low as 1.2% during long-term follow-up with a mean duration of nearly 68 months.6–8 In a retrospective analysis of 1029 patients with solitary T1N0M0 PTC, disease progression showed no significant difference between the MWA and surgical groups, while MWA demonstrated fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications. T1b tumors exhibited a slightly slower absorption rate than T1a lesions.2 A prospective study with 461 participants also found no difference in recurrence or shrinkage rates between PTMCs with or without capsular invasion.9 Microwave ablation has further shown value in treating multifocal PTMCs.10,11 In addition, its use in benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) has been well documented. Lin et al reported favorable therapeutic and cosmetic outcomes in 87 patients with large BTNs of 4 centimeters or more treated with MWA.12 Similarly, a 48-month study involving 148 patients demonstrated a mean reduction of 96.9% in nodule volume, with a recurrence rate of only 1.35% and no significant alteration in thyroid function.13 Collectively, these findings support MWA as a safe and minimally invasive option for both benign and low-risk malignant thyroid nodules. Despite its proven clinical efficacy, the biological mechanisms underlying MWA remain poorly characterized. The processes within the ablation zone—including coagulative necrosis, stress response, immune activation, and tissue remodeling—are incompletely understood.
Local Biological and Cellular Responses to Microwave Ablation
Thermal Injury and Coagulative Necrosis
Microwave ablation (MWA) generates localized high temperature that irreversibly destroys thyroid tumor cells, leading to the release of tumor-specific and tumor-associated antigens (TSA, TAA) as well as intracellular danger signals. The technique relies on the dielectric hysteresis effect, in which an oscillating electromagnetic field between 900 and 2500 megahertz drives polar molecules, mainly water, to continuously reorient with the alternating field. This movement increases molecular kinetic energy, rapidly raising tissue temperature to 60 to 100 °C. At these levels, proteins denature, membranes lose integrity, and the cells undergo coagulation and dehydration, leading to necrosis.14–16 The mechanism of thermal injury occurs at both the membrane and subcellular levels and is influenced by the tumor microenvironment.17 The ablation area can be divided into three zones: a central region of coagulative necrosis, a surrounding margin of reversible sublethal damage, and adjacent unaffected thyroid tissue.18 Cellular injury arises from both direct heat effects and secondary ischemia. The extent of destruction depends on power, exposure time, and the thermal tolerance of the target tissue. Continuous exposure to 40 to 45 °C for 30 to 60 minutes can cause irreversible damage, while exposure above 60 °C results in cell death within seconds.19 At temperatures between approximately 41 and 59 °C, cells experience sublethal heat stress resulting in reversible or delayed injury, whereas above 60 °C, coagulative necrosis occurs almost instantaneously.20 This temperature range reflects the steep gradient immediately outside the central necrotic zone, where perfusion-mediated heat dissipation causes a rapid temperature drop, forming a narrow but biologically active transitional zone. Thermal coagulation represents an irreversible process that involves the denaturation of proteins, organelle destruction, and breakdown of cellular and extracellular structures.21 Denatured proteins expose hydrophobic residues, lose their alpha-helical and beta-sheet configurations, and eventually unfold into random coil conformations above 80 °C.22 These molecular alterations cause cytoplasmic homogenization, nuclear shrinkage, and membrane rupture, which are the histological hallmarks of coagulative necrosis.
In the peripheral zone, sublethal exposure between 45 and 60 °C can trigger delayed apoptosis or ferroptosis over several days. Beyond this boundary, transient physiological changes such as increased blood flow, permeability, and oxygenation may occur.23 Importantly, coagulative necrosis exposes intracellular antigens, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and heat shock proteins (HSPs). These molecules recruit and activate antigen-presenting cells, bridging local tissue destruction with systemic antitumor immune activation. This link between thermal injury and immune stimulation provides a biological foundation for combining MWA with immunotherapy in thyroid cancer.
Cell Membrane Rupture and Structural Damage
Disruption of cell membrane integrity is one of the primary mechanisms through which MWA induces cell death.19,24 When exposed to heat, the lipid structure becomes unstable Thermally induced “superfluidity” alters the function of membrane-associated proteins, even under moderate stress conditions.25 Even mild heating beyond 37 °C can enhance membrane fluidity and permeability.26 The cytoskeleton also contributes significantly to membrane stability. Alterations in actin filaments and microtubules often accompany increased membrane permeability. Such structural changes compromise diffusion and transmembrane transport, ultimately leading to cellular rupture and death.
In thyroid tumor MWA, membrane rupture represents a key event in tumor cell destruction. This breakdown also triggers innate immune activation by releasing intracellular components such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), and other DAMPs, which promote immunogenic cell death.27 Studies have shown that multiple ablation techniques can induce the exposure of calreticulin, ATP, and HMGB1, which are essential for dendritic cell activation and subsequent adaptive immune responses.28 Ferroptosis, another immunogenic cell death pathway, is associated with DAMP release and inflammation.29 These processes are closely linked to mitochondrial injury, endoplasmic reticulum stress, DNA fragmentation, and pyroptosis, indicating that membrane damage serves as the initiating event within the post-ablation immunoregulatory cascade. Although extensive studies have explored how heat disrupts cellular lipids and structural proteins, systematic research on thyroid-specific membrane alterations remains limited.30 Future investigations combining real-time imaging, multi-omics analysis, and animal models may clarify how membrane injury interacts with immune responses. Understanding this dynamic relationship will help refine ablation parameters and support the rational design of MWA-based immunotherapy strategies.
Mitochondrial and Endoplasmic Reticulum Damage
Papillary thyroid carcinoma cells have been observed to exhibit a characteristic increase in mitochondrial number.31 Heat treatment has been demonstrated to induce significant alterations in mitochondrial membrane permeability, resulting in impaired electron transport within the respiratory chain. This phenomenon is accompanied by excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a substantial decline in ATP synthesis, consequently leading to disruption of energy metabolism.32 These functional alterations emerge early, with mitochondrial ultrastructural abnormalities typically observable within minutes. These include the premature appearance of inner dense granules, vesiculation and swelling of cristae, expansion of cristae spaces, and myelin-like degeneration.33 The structural integrity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is similarly susceptible to thermal damage. The molecular oscillations induced by microwave ablation have been shown to disrupt ER function, trigger ER stress responses, and cause marked ER dilation. Given that thyroid cancer cells typically exist in a microenvironment characterized by nutrient deprivation and high metabolic stress, their ER is more fragile than that of normal cells, making it more susceptible to irreversible damage under thermal stress.34,35 Damage to the mitochondria and the ER has been demonstrated to disrupt not only energy metabolism and protein folding, but also to induce programmed cell death, such as apoptosis and pyroptosis. This process has been shown to occur through calcium signaling disruption, excessive ROS production, and activation of stress pathways.36–39 The present state of research on mitochondrial—ER interactions following thyroid tumor microwave ablation and their role in induced immune regulation remains limited. Future studies integrating real-time imaging, multi-omics analyses, and immunological experiments may help clarify how microwave ablation modulates immunogenic cell death, inflammatory responses, and tumor immune microenvironment remodeling, thereby providing a more rigorous mechanistic basis for combination strategies involving MWA and immunotherapy.
DNA Double-Strand Breaks (DSBs)
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) represent one of the most severe forms of genetic injury. The phosphorylated histone variant histone H2A.X phosphorylated on serine 139 (γH2AX) is widely used as a biomarker for DSB formation. Elevated temperature during MWA can directly induce DNA strand scission and impair repair capacity in thyroid tumor cells. Heat exposure rapidly increases γH2AX foci formation in mammalian cells, signifying the accumulation of DNA strand breaks.40 At the same time, hyperthermia disrupts key DNA repair pathways, producing transient repair defects and promoting the persistence of DSBs.41 Two main mechanisms are implicated in heat-induced DSB formation. First, elevated temperature denatures thermosensitive DNA repair enzymes, particularly DNA polymerase alpha and beta, which are essential for strand resynthesis.42–45 Loss of polymerase activity compromises the accuracy of base excision and recombination repair. Second, heat induces abnormal condensation of chromatin and matrix proteins, distorting chromatin organization and restricting access of repair complexes.26,46 Experimental data demonstrate a clear time- and dose-dependent relationship between temperature elevation and DSB persistence, with γH2AX signal intensity correlating with both exposure duration and thermal dose.47
Altered γH2AX and DNA damage response (DDR) signaling have been identified in thyroid tumors, suggesting that DSBs may serve as quantifiable biomarkers of thermal injury.48 Although direct visualization of DSB kinetics following MWA remains limited, current evidence indicates that heat-induced enzyme inactivation, oxidative stress, and chromatin disruption collectively contribute to DSB accumulation in both tumor and adjacent thyroid tissue.
Importantly, DSBs can act as potent triggers of immunogenic cell death (ICD). Persistent or improperly repaired DNA fragments that leak into the cytoplasm can activate the cyclic guanosine monophosphate–adenosine monophosphate (cyclic GMP–AMP, cGAMP) synthase (cGAS)–stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signaling pathway, initiating type I interferon and chemokine responses.49,50 This signaling cascade enhances dendritic cell maturation and T-cell priming, linking genotoxic injury to immune activation. Persistent or improperly repaired DNA fragments can activate the cGAS–STING pathway, initiating type I interferon and pro-inflammatory responses. Moreover, DNA repair factors such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and BRCA1/2 (DNA repair–associated genes) have been shown to modulate cGAS–STING signaling under DNA damage conditions, further influencing innate immune activation.50 To clarify these processes in MWA, systematic quantification of γH2AX foci and assessment of cGAS–STING pathway activation will help delineate the immune consequences of DNA injury. Understanding this interplay between DNA repair and innate immunity may guide optimized combinations of MWA and immunotherapy to enhance antitumor.
Inflammatory Response and Absorption Processes Within the Ablated Zone
MWA induces rapid coagulative necrosis of thyroid follicles and follicular epithelium, leading to the release of tumor antigens and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). This inflammatory milieu recruit’s macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), and natural killer (NK) cells that orchestrate innate immune responses and link local tissue damage with systemic immune activation. This cellular disruption initiates an aseptic inflammatory cascade characterized by increased vascular permeability, upregulation of adhesion molecules, and recruitment of macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells.32,51–53 Histological examination typically reveals a fibrous capsule encircling necrotic tissue, containing inflammatory infiltrates and degenerative cells that exhibit nuclear enlargement and focal chromatin dispersion.54 Over time, necrotic tissue is degraded and cleared through lymphatic drainage and phagocytic activity.55,56 As macrophages infiltrate the ablation zone, they release cytokines and growth factors that promote angiogenesis, extracellular matrix deposition, and debris clearance.57 Notably, this acute sterile inflammation engenders conducive conditions for adaptive immune responses (eg, dendritic cell maturation and cross-priming of CD8+ T cells), which may elucidate the local–systemic (abscopal) immune effects observed following thermal ablation.32,51,58 This cascade bridges local tissue destruction with systemic antitumor immunity and may underlie the abscopal effect observed in various ablation models.
However, the balance between immune activation and pro-tumor remodeling remains complex. While inflammatory signaling can enhance immune surveillance, persistent activation of growth and angiogenic factors may favor recurrence or residual tumor proliferation. Therefore, delineating the temporal dynamics of inflammation—from acute immune activation to late tissue repair—is essential for identifying therapeutic windows for immunomodulation. Future research should focus on integrating cytokine profiling, immune cell tracking, and imaging-based monitoring to clarify how MWA-induced inflammation influences long-term outcomes. Understanding these pathways could inform strategies to enhance beneficial immune effects while minimizing pro-tumor remodeling, thereby improving both local control and systemic response to therapy.
Cell Death Modes: Apoptosis and Pyroptosis
MWA induces various forms of programmed cell death depending on temperature and exposure duration. When thermal stress is moderate, apoptosis predominates, whereas exposure to higher temperatures (typically above 50 °C) shifts the mechanism toward necrosis.59 MWA generates substantial oxidative stress, resulting in excessive ROS production and depletion of intracellular glutathione (GSH). These biochemical alterations sensitize cells to heat-induced injury and activate intrinsic apoptotic pathways.60 During this process, phosphatidylserine (PS) translocates to the outer plasma membrane, serving as an “eat-me” signal that promotes macrophage-mediated clearance of dying cells while limiting the release of proinflammatory molecules.61,62 The controlled nature of apoptosis thus allows tissue remodeling to proceed with minimal inflammatory spillover. In contrast, pyroptosis is a proinflammatory form of programmed cell death, in which membrane pore formation leads to cellular swelling and promotes the release of inflammatory cytokines.61,63 MWA also promotes lipid peroxidation through ROS accumulation and iron-dependent Fenton reactions, triggering ferroptosis, another regulated death pathway distinct from apoptosis.32 This process links oxidative stress to lipid damage and underscores the complexity of cell death regulation under hyperthermic conditions. Collectively, apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis form an interconnected network that dictates the balance between tumor eradication, inflammation, and immune activation.
While apoptosis contributes to orderly cell clearance, pyroptosis and ferroptosis enhance the immunogenic potential of ablated tissue by releasing DAMPs and inflammatory mediators. These signals activate dendritic cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, thereby facilitating adaptive immune responses. However, the relative contribution of each cell death pathway in thyroid tumor ablation remains largely undefined. Future studies integrating molecular profiling, live imaging, and immunologic assays may elucidate how different death modes coordinate local cytotoxicity and systemic immunity. Understanding these mechanisms will be essential for refining MWA protocols and developing combination strategies that leverage cell death–driven immunogenicity to improve clinical outcomes.64
Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns and Heat Shock Proteins Mediate Immunogenic Cell Death
Following the process of MWA, a significant release of tumor-specific and associated antigens occurs, along with DAMPs—including DNA, RNA, HMGB1, ATP, and heat shock proteins HSP70/HSP90—into the microenvironment.65 These molecules act as danger signals that activate antigen-presenting cells (APCs) through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Toll-like receptors (TLRs).58,66 Activated DCs internalize these antigens, upregulate costimulatory molecules (CD80/CD86), and present them via major histocompatibility complex (MHC) pathways to CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. These activated DCs subsequently prime CD4⁺ helper T cells and CD8⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), forming the core of adaptive immune activation following MWA. NK cells may also participate by eliminating residual tumor cells (Figure 1).67–69 This process characterizes immunogenic cell death (ICD), linking physical tumor destruction to immune activation. Released HMGB1 and ATP not only promote DC maturation but also stimulate cytokine production and effector T-cell activation. Moreover, HMGB1 supports tissue repair by recruiting stem cells and promoting angiogenesis.70,71 Heat shock proteins (HSPs) play dual roles in this process.72 Exposure to thermal stress markedly increases expression of HSP25/27, HSP70, and HSP90.45,60,73 Acting as ATP-dependent chaperones, they assist protein refolding, prevent aggregation, and modulate apoptosis through regulation of p53 and Bax.74 HSP27 and HSP70 can translocate into the nucleus, enhancing DNA polymerase beta activity, while HSP90 stabilizes oncogenic proteins and promotes angiogenesis, contributing to tumor resilience.45,60,75 Inhibition of HSP90 has been shown to increase thermal sensitivity and strengthen ICD responses, suggesting a potential strategy for combining MWA with molecular chaperone inhibitors.76,77 Overall, DAMPs and HSPs bridge thermal cytotoxicity and immune activation. Their coordinated release transforms ablated tumor tissue into an in-situ vaccine that activates both innate and adaptive immunity, providing a mechanistic foundation for integrating MWA with immunotherapy.
Figure 1.
Immunogenic cell death induced by microwave ablation of thyroid tumor cells. MWA induces the release of TSA, TAA, and DAMPs, including DNA, RNA, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), ATP, and HSP70 and HSP90. These molecules activate PRRs on APCs, such as dendritic cells and macrophages. Activated APCs stimulate CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses and NK cell activation, ultimately leading to tumor cell death and systemic antitumor immunity.
Vascular Injury, Hypoxic Response, and Tissue Fibrosis/Remodeling
Vascular disruption is one of the earliest and most critical biological effects of MWA. Local heating increases vascular permeability and causes thermal collapse of small blood vessels, leading to microvascular occlusion and ischemia.78,79 This process amplifies tumor hypoxia and metabolic stress, enhancing thermal sensitivity of the ablated tissue.80,81 Compared with other ablation modalities, MWA effectively reduces the “heat-sink” effect caused by blood flow, resulting in a more uniform necrotic zone.82 Endothelial cells are highly heat-sensitive; exposure above 44 °C causes their rapid detachment and death, leading to vessel rupture and localized hemorrhage.26,83,84 These vascular alterations contribute to secondary ischemic necrosis and nutrient deprivation within the tumor, extending ablation efficacy beyond direct cytotoxic effects. Subsequently, the hypoxic microenvironment activates hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α), which upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other angiogenesis-related genes.85–88 The HIF-1α/VEGF pathway promotes endothelial proliferation, new vessel formation, and metabolic adaptation.89–91 In thyroid cancer, elevated HIF-1α expression correlates with tumor aggressiveness and increased neovascularization.92–94 Excessive VEGF signaling can further stimulate vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1–mediated neovascularization in periablational zones.95,96 Although direct experimental validation in thyroid tumors remains limited, this signaling cascade likely plays a key role in tissue recovery and remodeling after MWA.97 During the repair phase, infiltrating macrophages and lymphocytes release transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), which induces fibroblast proliferation and transdifferentiation into myofibroblasts.19 These cells synthesize collagen and extracellular matrix proteins, gradually replacing necrotic areas with fibrotic scar tissue.98–100 This process restores local perfusion and tissue integrity but may also facilitate tumor adaptation if excessive fibrosis occurs.
In summary, vascular injury and the subsequent hypoxia-fibrosis sequence constitute a double-edged response. On one hand, these changes support wound healing and tissue stability; on the other, they may promote residual tumor survival or recurrence through aberrant angiogenesis. Future studies should explore whether targeting HIF-1α/VEGF or modulating fibrosis can enhance local control and minimize pro-tumor remodeling after ablation.101 The overall biological mechanisms of microwave ablation are summarized in Figure 2. Collectively, these local biological and cellular events not only determine the extent of thermal injury and tissue remodeling but also initiate a cascade of immune activation, which will be further discussed in Systemic Immunomodulation and Translational Implications.
Figure 2.
Schematic illustration of the biological and immunological mechanisms within thyroid tumor ablation zones. (a) Central zone: Localized microwave energy rapidly elevates tissue temperature (≥60 °C), leading to irreversible coagulative necrosis characterized by protein denaturation, membrane rupture, mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum damage, and DNA double-strand breaks. (b) Peripheral or transitional zone: Sublethal hyperthermia (approximately 41–59 °C, depending on exposure duration, perfusion, and tissue properties) induces partial thermal injury with the generation of necrotic tissue fragments and promotes the release of TSA, TAA, and DAMPs, including HSPs (HSP25, HSP27, HSP70, HSP90). These molecules activate macrophages, DCs, NK cells, and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T cells. In addition, oxidative stress, characterized by excessive ROS production and depletion of intracellular glutathione (GSH), and microvascular collapse upregulate angiogenesis-related genes and compromise DNA repair capacity. (c) Normal thyroid tissue and regional immune response: Tumor-derived antigens and DAMPs drain via lymphatic channels to adjacent lymph nodes, where dendritic cells present antigens to T cells, initiating adaptive immune activation. Activated NK cells, macrophages, and plasma cells promote CTL responses and antibody production, thereby enhancing systemic antitumor immunity after MWA.
Notes: Temperature values are approximate and may vary depending on tissue perfusion, exposure time, and water content. Outside the central coagulative zone, temperatures decrease sharply due to perfusion-mediated heat dissipation; thus, the sublethal range (41–59 °C) represents an expanded interpretation of this steep thermal gradient based on updated modeling and thyroid-specific data. This schematic illustration was adapted from Chu KF and Dupuy DE (Thermal ablation of tumors: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy, Nature Reviews Cancer, 2014; 14(3):199–208,doi: 10.1038/nrc3672) with modifications and additional immune-related mechanisms specific to thyroid tumor ablation.
Systemic Immunomodulation and Translational Implications
MWA not only destroys tumor tissue locally but also initiates a cascade of immune responses. The release of tumor-associated antigens and DAMPs activates antigen-presenting cells and stimulates both innate and adaptive immunity. This process converts an immunologically “cold” tumor into a “hot” one, enhancing systemic immune surveillance.52,58
Systemic Immune Cell Dynamics After MWA
The dynamic variations in peripheral immune cells provide important insight into the systemic immunomodulatory effects of MWA. This treatment exerts both local and systemic actions—directly eliminating tumor cells through heat-induced cytotoxicity and indirectly activating immune responses in distant tissues.26 Clinical studies in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) have reported transient elevations in T-cell subsets following MWA. Specifically, CD3⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells, along with the CD4/CD8 ratio, significantly increase within the first two weeks post-procedure, accompanied by higher levels of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). These changes typically return to baseline within one month, suggesting a temporary activation of cellular immunity.102 Comparable trends have been documented in other solid tumor ablation models, showing increased CD8⁺ T-cell activity and reduced regulatory T-cell populations.103,104 These alterations likely result from antigen release and DAMP-mediated activation rather than long-term lymphocyte proliferation.105 Treatment parameters such as thermal dose and ablation volume also influence immune responses, providing a rationale for optimizing combination timing with immunotherapy.106
Autoimmune Responses and Thyroid Function Changes
Most studies show that microwave ablation causes only mild, transient effects on thyroid function and autoantibody levels. In both benign and malignant nodules, thyroid hormones such as triiodothyronine (T3), free triiodothyronine (fT3), and free thyroxine (fT4) remain stable, while transient changes in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) may occur shortly after treatment.107 However, patients with pre-existing autoimmune thyroiditis or elevated thyroglobulin antibody (TGAb) and thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) levels may experience temporary antibody increases post-ablation.108 In these cases, tissue injury and inflammatory activation can provoke short-lived autoimmune responses. Therefore, thyroid function and antibody levels should be closely monitored, particularly during the first week, first month, and subsequent three to twelve months after MWA. Continuous follow-up allows for early identification of persistent dysfunction and immune-related abnormalities.
Immune-Related Transcriptomic Reprogramming
Transcriptomic studies have demonstrated that MWA reshapes immune-related gene expression within both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the ablation microenvironment. Post-ablation analysis in low-risk thyroid cancer revealed suppression of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling and downregulation of pro-tumor chemokines such as CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL8, while anti-tumor chemokine pathways including CXC receptor 3 (CXCR3) were upregulated.109,110 These transcriptional changes favor a Th1-dominant immune response consistent with DAMP-induced antigen presentation and T-cell priming.110,111 Microwave ablation also enhances innate immune signaling via pattern recognition receptor pathways, particularly Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation.112 These transcriptomic alterations are time-dependent and influenced by heat intensity, tumor immune status, and host background. Multi-omics and longitudinal analyses integrating single-cell sequencing and immune profiling could further clarify the kinetics of immune activation and identify optimal therapeutic windows for combination immunotherapy.
Combination Strategies with Immunotherapy and Future Perspectives
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) restore antitumor T-cell activity by blocking inhibitory pathways such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1).113 Monoclonal antibodies targeting these checkpoints, including ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, have shown durable responses across various solid tumors.114–116 Microwave ablation enhances the effects of ICIs by increasing antigen exposure and inducing immunogenic cell death. In preclinical models, combining MWA with PD-L1 blockade elevated CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration, improved immune memory formation, and enhanced tumor regression compared with either therapy alone.116,117 This synergy likely arises from the release of tumor antigens and the reduction of immunosuppressive elements such as regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells.118
Although targeted agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) including vandetanib and cabozantinib are approved for advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma,119 clinical studies on MWA–ICI combination therapy in thyroid cancer remain limited. Key questions persist regarding the optimal timing of combination, the balance between thermal dosage and immune activation, and biomarkers predicting efficacy or immune-related toxicity.120 Future studies should address these aspects to establish standardized regimens and confirm the translational potential of MWA–ICI therapy.
From a clinical perspective, the rationale for combining microwave ablation (MWA) with immunotherapy is likely to depend on both tumor histology and disease stage. In low-risk, well-differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), MWA may be considered as a local cytoreductive intervention that also functions as an in situ source of tumor antigens, potentially supporting post-ablation immune priming in carefully selected cT1–T2N0M0 patients. However, the current clinical evidence supporting thermal ablation in thyroid malignancies remains limited and is largely restricted to early-stage, well-differentiated disease.121–123 By contrast, clinical experience with immunotherapy in thyroid cancer has primarily accumulated in aggressive subtypes—particularly anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC)—where immune checkpoint blockade and combination strategies have been more frequently explored.120,124,125
Special time-sensitive clinical scenarios may also inform future translational considerations for thyroid ablation. In organ-donor settings, incidentally detected thyroid nodules require rapid and reliable risk stratification to avoid delays in organ procurement, and streamlined diagnostic approaches have been proposed to efficiently exclude clinically significant malignancy.126,127 These reports underscore real-world contexts in which prompt thyroid nodule assessment is essential, while prognostic associations of immunotherapy-related biomarkers, such as PD-L1, in follicular epithelial–derived thyroid carcinomas provide a broader biological rationale for continued interest in immune-informed ablation strategies.128
In addition, MWA should not be considered interchangeable with other thermal ablation modalities, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or laser ablation (LA). Differences in energy deposition and susceptibility to perfusion-mediated heat-sink effects may influence ablation geometry and thermal gradients. These biophysical distinctions could lead to divergent patterns of local inflammation and immune microenvironment remodeling, an important consideration when designing future ablation–immunotherapy combination trials.19,129
Conclusion
Microwave ablation (MWA) offers a precise, minimally invasive treatment for thyroid tumors that integrates direct cytotoxicity with systemic immune activation. Through rapid tissue heating, MWA induces irreversible coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation, and cellular membrane disruption. These thermal injuries trigger multiple forms of programmed cell death—including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis—and promote the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and heat shock proteins (HSPs). Together, these molecular events enhance dendritic cell activation, T-cell priming, and systemic antitumor immunity.
Within the ablation zone, vascular occlusion and transient hypoxia stimulate hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways, facilitating angiogenesis and tissue repair. Immune activation is strongest within the peripheral transitional zone, where sublethal heat stress promotes antigen release and dendritic cell priming. However, excessive remodeling may also foster fibrotic adaptation and tumor tolerance, highlighting the need to balance reparative and pro-tumor processes. Systemically, transient fluctuations in T-cell subsets, cytokine release, and autoimmune antibody levels reflect the dynamic immunoregulatory effects of MWA.
Collectively, these findings suggest that, beyond achieving local tumor destruction, MWA may influence the tumor immune microenvironment with potential implications for systemic immune regulation. Understanding these biological and immunological mechanisms will support the refinement of ablation parameters and inform future strategies combining MWA with immunotherapy. Ultimately, MWA may function as an in situ tumor vaccine, bridging local ablation and systemic antitumor response, and offering new insights into the integrative management of thyroid malignancies.
Overall, the integration of microwave ablation into immunologically informed treatment strategies for thyroid cancer will require further clinical validation, with particular attention to patient selection, disease stage, and procedural context.
Funding Statement
There is no funding to report.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–14. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhao ZL, Wang SR, Dong G, et al. Microwave ablation versus surgical resection for US-detected multifocal T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: a 10-center study. Radiology. 2024;311(1):e230459. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.vanSonnenberg E, Simeone JF. Microwave ablation versus surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma: more therapeutic options, more controversies. Radiology. 2022;304(3):714–715. doi: 10.1148/radiol.220896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mauri G, Hegedüs L, Bandula S, et al. European thyroid association and cardiovascular and interventional radiological society of Europe 2021 clinical practice guideline for the use of minimally invasive treatments in malignant thyroid lesions. Eur Thyroid J. 2021;10(3):185–197. doi: 10.1159/000516469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mauri G, Orsi F, Carriero S, et al. Image-guided thermal ablation as an alternative to surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: preliminary results of an Italian experience. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:575152. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.575152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Han ZY, Dou JP, Zheng L, et al. Safety and efficacy of microwave ablation for the treatment of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a prospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(11):7942–7951. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09802-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Teng DK, Li WH, Du JR, Wang H, Yang DY, Wu XL. Effects of microwave ablation on papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a five-year follow-up report. Thyroid. 2020;30(12):1752–1758. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cho SJ, Baek SM, Na DG, Lee KD, Shong YK, Baek JH. Five-year follow-up results of thermal ablation for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(9):6446–6456. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07808-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zheng L, Dou JP, Han ZY, et al. Microwave ablation for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma with and without US-detected capsule invasion: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Radiology. 2023;307(3):e220661. doi: 10.1148/radiol.220661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhou HD, Yu XY, Wei Y, et al. A preliminary study on the microwave ablation of multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2024;31(6):2306–2311. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhao ZL, Dong G, Wang SR, et al. Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for the treatment of multifocal versus unifocal T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: a propensity-matched multicentre retrospective study. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(12):8727–8735. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09932-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cang YC, Fan FY, Liu Y, et al. Efficacy of microwave ablation in the treatment of large benign thyroid nodules: a multi-center study. Eur Radiol. 2024;34(10):6852–6861. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10614-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Du JR, Li WH, Quan CH, Wang H, Teng DK. Long-term outcome of microwave ablation for benign thyroid nodules: over 48-month follow-up study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:941137. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.941137 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lubner MG, Brace CL, Hinshaw JL, Lee FT Jr. Microwave tumor ablation: mechanism of action, clinical results, and devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(8 Suppl):S192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Microwave ablation: principles and applications. Radiographics. 2005;25 Suppl 1(suppl_1):S69–83. doi: 10.1148/rg.25si055501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dong F, Wu Y, Li W, et al. Advancements in microwave ablation for tumor treatment and future directions. iScience. 2025;28(4):112175. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nikfarjam M, Muralidharan V, Christophi C. Mechanisms of focal heat destruction of liver tumors. J Surg Res. 2005;127(2):208–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT Jr, Goldberg SN. Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology. 2011;258(2):351–369. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10081634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chu KF, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of tumours: biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(3):199–208. doi: 10.1038/nrc3672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dubinsky TJ, Cuevas C, Dighe MK, Kolokythas O, Hwang JH. High-intensity focused ultrasound: current potential and oncologic applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(1):191–199. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thomsen S. Pathologic analysis of photothermal and photomechanical effects of laser-tissue interactions. Photochem Photobiol. 1991;53(6):825–835. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb09897.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Davis PJ, Williams SC. Protein modification by thermal processing. Allergy. 1998;53(46 Suppl):102–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb04975.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Diederich CJ. Thermal ablation and high-temperature thermal therapy: overview of technology and clinical implementation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2005;21(8):745–753. doi: 10.1080/02656730500271692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Despa F, Orgill DP, Neuwalder J, Lee RC. The relative thermal stability of tissue macromolecules and cellular structure in burn injury. Burns. 2005;31(5):568–577. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Balogh G, Péter M, Glatz A, et al. Key role of lipids in heat stress management. FEBS Lett. 2013;587(13):1970–1980. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van den Tempel N, Horsman MR, Kanaar R. Improving efficacy of hyperthermia in oncology by exploiting biological mechanisms. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32(4):446–454. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2016.1157216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu Z, Xu X, Liu K, Zhang J, Ding D, Fu R. Immunogenic cell death in hematological malignancy therapy. Adv Sci. 2023;10(13):e2207475. doi: 10.1002/advs.202207475 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang M, Duan Y, Yang M, et al. The analysis of immunogenic cell death induced by ablation at different temperatures in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1146195. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1146195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Choi M, Shin J, Lee CE, et al. Immunogenic cell death in cancer immunotherapy. BMB Rep. 2023;56(5):275–286. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2023-0024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lepock JR. Cellular effects of hyperthermia: relevance to the minimum dose for thermal damage. Int J Hyperthermia. 2003;19(3):252–266. doi: 10.1080/0265673031000065042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Albores-Saavedra J, Altamirano-Dimas M, Alcorta-Anguizola B, Smith M. Fine structure of human papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 1971;28(3):763–774. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197109)28:3<763::AID-CNCR2820280335>3.0.CO;2-D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yu L, Cheng M, Liu J, et al. Crosstalk between microwave ablation and ferroptosis: The next hot topic? Front Oncol. 2023;13:1099731. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1099731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wheatley DN, Kerr C, Gregory DW. Heat-induced damage to HeLa-S3 cells: correlation of viability, permeability, osmosensitivity, phase-contrast light-, scanning electron- and transmission electron-microscopical findings. Int J Hyperthermia. 1989;5(2):145–162. doi: 10.3109/02656738909140444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dukic B, Ruppert Z, Tóth ME, et al. Mild Hyperthermia-Induced Thermogenesis in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Defines Stress Response Mechanisms. Cells. 2024;13(13):1141. doi: 10.3390/cells13131141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li S, Liu Y, Liu X, Lan B, Li W, Guo F. Magnetite Fe(3)O(4) Nanoparticles enhance mild microwave ablation of tumor by activating the IRE1-ASK1-JNK pathway and inducing endoplasmic reticulum stress. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:6129–6140. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S312823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Momma K, Homma T, Isaka R, Sudevan S, Higashitani A. Heat-induced calcium leakage causes mitochondrial damage in Caenorhabditis elegans body-wall muscles. Genetics. 2017;206(4):1985–1994. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.202747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.White MG, Saleh O, Nonner D, Barrett EF, Moraes CT, Barrett JN. Mitochondrial dysfunction induced by heat stress in cultured rat CNS neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108(8):2203–2214. doi: 10.1152/jn.00638.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen X, Guo X, Ge Q, Zhao Y, Mu H, Zhang J. ER stress activates the NLRP3 inflammasome: a novel mechanism of atherosclerosis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:3462530. doi: 10.1155/2019/3462530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Qian L, Song X, Ren H, Gong J, Cheng S. Mitochondrial mechanism of heat stress-induced injury in rat cardiomyocyte. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2004;9(3):281–293. doi: 10.1379/CSC-20R.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Takahashi A, Mori E, Somakos GI, Ohnishi K, Ohnishi T. Heat induces gammaH2AX foci formation in mammalian cells. Mutat Res. 2008;656(1–2):88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Oei AL, Vriend LE, Crezee J, Franken NA, Krawczyk PM. Effects of hyperthermia on DNA repair pathways: one treatment to inhibit them all. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0462-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dikomey E, Jung H. Correlation between thermal radiosensitization and heat-induced loss of DNA polymerase beta activity in CHO cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 1993;63(2):215–221. doi: 10.1080/09553009314550281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Raaphorst GP, Feeley MM. Hyperthermia radiosensitization in human glioma cells comparison of recovery of polymerase activity, survival, and potentially lethal damage repair. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;29(1):133–139. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90235-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Spiro IJ, Denman DL, Dewey WC. Effect of hyperthermia on CHO DNA polymerases alpha and beta. Radiat Res. 1982;89(1):134–149. doi: 10.2307/3575691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Takahashi A, Yamakawa N, Mori E, et al. Development of thermotolerance requires interaction between polymerase-beta and heat shock proteins. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(5):973–978. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00759.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Krawczyk PM, Eppink B, Essers J, et al. Mild hyperthermia inhibits homologous recombination, induces BRCA2 degradation, and sensitizes cancer cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(24):9851–9856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101053108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zastko L, Petrovičová P, Račková A, et al. DNA damage response and apoptosis induced by hyperthermia in human umbilical cord blood lymphocytes. Toxicol In Vitro. 2021;73:105127. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hu JL, Hu SS, Hou XX, et al. Abnormal expression of DNA double-strand breaks related genes, ATM and GammaH2AX, in thyroid carcinoma. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:136810. doi: 10.1155/2015/136810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li T, Chen ZJ. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway connects DNA damage to inflammation, senescence, and cancer. J Exp Med. 2018;215(5):1287–1299. doi: 10.1084/jem.20180139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wan D, Jiang W, Hao J. Research advances in how the cGAS-STING pathway controls the cellular inflammatory response. Front Immunol. 2020;11:615. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhao ZL, Wei Y, Liu CH, et al. Changes in thyroid antibodies after microwave ablation of thyroid nodules. Int J Endocrinol. 2022;2022:7916327. doi: 10.1155/2022/7916327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu F, Wei Z, Ye X. Immunomodulatory effects of microwave ablation on malignant tumors. Am J Cancer Res. 2024;14(6):2714–2730. doi: 10.62347/QJID8425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ma F, Lin Y, Ni Z, et al. Microwave ablation enhances the systemic immune response in patients with lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2024;27(3):106. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chen Y, Liu W, Jin C, et al. Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for benign thyroid nodules results in earlier and faster nodule shrinkage in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis than in those with normal thyroid function. Front Surg. 2023;10:1077077. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1077077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kuo TC, Chen KY, Hu HW, et al. Surgical and pathological challenges in thyroidectomy after thermal ablation of thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2024;34(12):1503–1512. doi: 10.1089/thy.2024.0281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Russotto F, Fiorentino V, Pizzimenti C, et al. Histologic evaluation of thyroid nodules treated with thermal ablation: an institutional experience. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(18):10182. doi: 10.3390/ijms251810182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pepple AL, Guy JL, McGinnis R, et al. Spatiotemporal local and abscopal cell death and immune responses to histotripsy focused ultrasound tumor ablation. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1012799. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1012799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liu P, Wei Z, Ye X. Immunostimulatory effects of thermal ablation: challenges and future prospects. J Cancer Res Ther. 2024;20(2):531–539. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2484_23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Harmon BV, Corder AM, Collins RJ, et al. Cell death induced in a murine mastocytoma by 42–47 degrees C heating in vitro: evidence that the form of death changes from apoptosis to necrosis above a critical heat load. Int J Radiat Biol. 1990;58(5):845–858. doi: 10.1080/09553009014552221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Slimen IB, Najar T, Ghram A, Dabbebi H, Ben Mrad M, Abdrabbah M. Reactive oxygen species, heat stress and oxidative-induced mitochondrial damage. A review. Int J Hyperthermia. 2014;30(7):513–523. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.971446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Costigan A, Hollville E, Martin SJ. Discriminating between apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, and ferroptosis by microscopy and flow cytometry. Curr Protoc. 2023;3(12):e951. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Endale HT, Tesfaye W, Mengstie TA. ROS induced lipid peroxidation and their role in ferroptosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1226044. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1226044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.He F, He Z, Wang C. A novel role of AIM2 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis in radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Hepatol. 2024;29(6):101532. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.He Z, Feng D, Zhang C, et al. Recent strategies for evoking immunogenic Pyroptosis in antitumor immunotherapy. J Control Release. 2024;366:375–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.12.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Vénéreau E, Ceriotti C, Bianchi ME. DAMPs from cell death to new life. Front Immunol. 2015;6:422. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Xiao W, Huang H, Zheng P, et al. The CXCL10/CXCR3 pathway contributes to the synergy of thermal ablation and PD-1 blockade therapy against tumors. Cancers. 2023;15(5):1427. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhu Y, Yang Z, Pan Z, et al. Metallo-alginate hydrogel can potentiate microwave tumor ablation for synergistic cancer treatment. Sci Adv. 2022;8(31):eabo5285. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo5285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Li X, Zhang X, Khan IU, et al. The anti-tumor effects of the combination of microwave hyperthermia and lobaplatin against breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Biosci Rep. 2022;42(2):BSR20190878. doi: 10.1042/BSR20190878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yu M, Pan H, Che N, et al. Microwave ablation of primary breast cancer inhibits metastatic progression in model mice via activation of natural killer cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(9):2153–2164. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0449-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Andersson U, Tracey KJ. HMGB1 is a therapeutic target for sterile inflammation and infection. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:139–162. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mandula JK, Chang S, Mohamed E, et al. Ablation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress kinase PERK induces paraptosis and type I interferon to promote anti-tumor T cell responses. Cancer Cell. 2022;40(10):1145–1160.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.08.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lettini G, Pietrafesa M, Lepore S, et al. Heat shock proteins in thyroid malignancies: potential therapeutic targets for poorly-differentiated and anaplastic tumours? Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;502:110676. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Trieb K, Sztankay A, Amberger A, Lechner H, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. Hyperthermia inhibits proliferation and stimulates the expression of differentiation markers in cultured thyroid carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 1994;87(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(94)90410-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lee MS, Lee J, Lee S, et al. Clinical, prognostic, and therapeutic significance of heat shock protein 27 in bladder cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(8):7961–7974. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Liu B, Qian D. Hsp90α and cell death in cancers: a review. Discov Oncol. 2024;15(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01021-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mouratidis PXE, Ter Haar G. HSP90 inhibition acts synergistically with heat to induce a pro-immunogenic form of cell death in colon cancer cells. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):1443–1456. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1983036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Li ZN, Luo Y. HSP90 inhibitors and cancer: prospects for use in targeted therapies (Review). Oncol Rep. 2023;49(1):6. doi: 10.3892/or.2022.8443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vaupel P, Kallinowski F, Okunieff P. Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. Cancer Res. 1989;49(23):6449–6465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Dewhirst MW, Cao Y, Moeller B. Cycling hypoxia and free radicals regulate angiogenesis and radiotherapy response. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(6):425–437. doi: 10.1038/nrc2397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Overgaard J, Bichel P. The influence of hypoxia and acidity on the hyperthermic response of malignant cells in vitro. Radiology. 1977;123(2):511–514. doi: 10.1148/123.2.511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gerweck LE, Nygaard TG, Burlett M. Response of cells to hyperthermia under acute and chronic hypoxic conditions. Cancer Res. 1979;39(3):966–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Andreano A, Huang Y, Meloni MF, Lee FT Jr, Brace C. Microwaves create larger ablations than radiofrequency when controlled for power in ex vivo tissue. Med Phys. 2010;37(6):2967–2973. doi: 10.1118/1.3432569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Vaupel P, Okunieff P, Neuringer LJ. In vivo 31P-NMR spectroscopy of murine tumours before and after localized hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia. 1990;6(1):15–31. doi: 10.3109/02656739009140801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lee SY, Ryu KH, Kang MS, Song CW. Effect of hyperthermia on the lactic acid and beta-hydroxybutyric acid content in tumour. Int J Hyperthermia. 1986;2(2):213–222. doi: 10.3109/02656738609012396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Otte J, Manz R, Thews G, Vaupel P. Impact of localized microwave hyperthermia on the oxygenation status of malignant tumors. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1982;157:49–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Urano M, Kahn J. The change in hypoxic and chronically hypoxic cell fraction in murine tumors treated with hyperthermia. Radiat Res. 1983;96(3):549–559. doi: 10.2307/3576121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wu J, Zhou Z, Huang Y, et al. Radiofrequency ablation: mechanisms and clinical applications. MedComm. 2024;5(10):e746. doi: 10.1002/mco2.746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Altun M, Zhao B, Velasco K, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 19 (USP19) regulates hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) during hypoxia. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(3):1962–1969. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.305615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):2039–2049. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Bao S, Wu Q, Sathornsumetee S, et al. Stem cell-like glioma cells promote tumor angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor. Cancer Res. 2006;66(16):7843–7848. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chen Z, Han F, Du Y, Shi H, Zhou W. Hypoxic microenvironment in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):70. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01332-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Abdel-Rahman O. Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway in iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC): from bench to bedside. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;94(1):45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Fallahi P, Mazzi V, Vita R, et al. New therapies for dedifferentiated papillary thyroid cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(3):6153–6182. doi: 10.3390/ijms16036153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bilgici B, Ecemis GC, Tuncel OK, Bayrak IK, Kan EK, Atmaca A. VEGF and GM-CSF levels in nodular thyroid diseases. Endocrine. 2014;45(1):61–66. doi: 10.1007/s12020-013-9945-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Liu Z, Dai H, Jia G, Liu Y, Li X, Ren W. Insufficient radiofrequency ablation promotes human hepatoma SMMC7721 cell proliferation by stimulating vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression. Oncol Lett. 2015;9(4):1893–1896. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mueller LE, Issa PP, Hussein MH, et al. Clinical outcomes and tumor microenvironment response to radiofrequency ablation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg. 2024;13(1):4–18. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ghalehbandi S, Yuzugulen J, Pranjol MZI, Pourgholami MH. The role of VEGF in cancer-induced angiogenesis and research progress of drugs targeting VEGF. Eur J Pharmacol. 2023;949:175586. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Penn JW, Grobbelaar AO, Rolfe KJ. The role of the TGF-β family in wound healing, burns and scarring: a review. Int J Burns Trauma. 2012;2(1):18–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Frangogiannis N. Transforming growth factor-β in tissue fibrosis. J Exp Med. 2020;217(3):e20190103. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lu C, Li X, Chu X, et al. Clinical effects of microwave ablation in the treatment of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas and related histopathological changes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:751213. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.751213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Magar AG, Morya VK, Kwak MK, Oh JU, Noh KC. A molecular perspective on HIF-1α and angiogenic stimulator networks and their role in solid tumors: an update. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(6):3313. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wu T, Sui GQ, Teng DK, Luo Q, Wang H, Lin YQ. Study on changes in immune function after microwave ablation of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 2022;14:2861–2868. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S358649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Jin Y, Zhao Q, Fan C, et al. Peripheral T-cell subsets in radiofrequency ablation for tumors from different origins. Asian J Surg. 2024;47(3):1378–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.12.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zhang L, Zhang M, Wang J, et al. Immunogenic change after percutaneous microwave ablation in pulmonary malignancies: variation in immune cell subsets and cytokines in peripheral blood. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1069192. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1069192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kim NJ, Yoon JH, Tuomi AC, Lee J, Kim D. In-situ tumor vaccination by percutaneous ablative therapy and its synergy with immunotherapeutics: an update on combination therapy. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1118845. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1118845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wang X, Zhang H, Liu Y. Abscopal effect: from a rare phenomenon to a new frontier in cancer therapy. Biomark Res. 2024;12(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00628-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Zhou XY, Yu XY, Wei Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for treatment of follicular thyroid neoplasms: a preliminary study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2024;41(1):2398558. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2024.2398558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Qiu L, Huang Y, Ge Y, et al. Thyroid dysfunction following thermal ablation of large solid and solid-predominant thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract. 2025;31(5):599–606. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2025.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Dominguez C, David JM, Palena C. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and inflammation at the site of the primary tumor. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;47:177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Li H, Liang L, Li J. Transcriptomic profiling in low-risk thyroid cancer induced by microwave ablation. Int J Endocrinol. 2024;2024:6674506. doi: 10.1155/2024/6674506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wang Y, Wang GZ, Chen C, et al. Exploration of the impact of multimode thermal therapy versus radiofrequency ablation on CD8(+) T effector cells of liver malignancies based on single cell transcriptomics. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1172362. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1172362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Yin L, Li XY, Zhu LL, et al. Clinical application status and prospect of the combined anti-tumor strategy of ablation and immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2022;13:965120. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.965120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Naimi A, Mohammed RN, Raji A, et al. Tumor immunotherapies by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the pros and cons. Cell Commun Signal. 2022;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12964-022-00854-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science. 2015;348(6230):56–61. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Mehta A, Oklu R, Sheth RA. Thermal ablative therapies and immune checkpoint modulation: can locoregional approaches effect a systemic response? Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:9251375. doi: 10.1155/2016/9251375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Xu F, Sang J, Wang N, et al. Microwave ablation combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor enhanced the antitumor immune activation and memory in rechallenged tumor mouse model. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025;74(5):161. doi: 10.1007/s00262-025-04003-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Xiao YL, Wu SY, Jiang YZ. Thermo-immune synergy: Camrelizumab plus microwave ablation in preoperative early-stage breast cancer. Med. 2024;5(4):278–280. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Mustafa AR, Miyasato D, Wehrenberg-Klee E. Synergizing thermal ablation modalities with immunotherapy: enough to induce systemic antitumoral immunity? J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024;35(2):185–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.10.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Di Molfetta S, Dotto A, Fanciulli G, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: new weapons against medullary thyroid cancer? Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:667784. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.667784 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Capdevila J, Wirth LJ, Ernst T, et al. PD-1 blockade in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(23):2620–2627. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Fei YL, Zhao ZL, Wei Y, et al. Propensity-matched comparison of microwave ablation and surgical resection for preoperative T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: 5-year follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11873-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Liu YT, Wei Y, Zhao ZL, et al. Thermal ablation vs surgical resection for ultrasound-detected T2N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncologist. 2025;30(6):oyaf170. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Liu YT, Wei Y, Zhao ZL, et al. Thermal ablation for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparing outcomes in T1N0M0 and T2N0M0 PTC. Acad Radiol. 2025;32(7):3915–3923. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Subbiah V, Kreitman RJ, Wainberg ZA, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant anaplastic thyroid cancer: updated analysis from the Phase II ROAR basket study. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(4):406–415. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.12.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Cabanillas ME, Dadu R, Ferrarotto R, et al. Rare tumor initiative Team. Anti-programmed death ligand 1 plus targeted therapy in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(12):1672–1680. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.4729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Locatello LG, Caiazza N, Cavallo Ronchi F, et al. Managing thyroid nodules in brain-dead donors: our experience and a review of the literature. Head Neck. 2025;47(2):651–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Eccher A, Girolami I, D’Errico A, et al. Management of thyroid nodules in deceased donors with comparison between fine needle aspiration and intraoperative frozen section in the setting of transplantation. Prog Transplant. 2019;29(4):316–320. doi: 10.1177/1526924819873898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Girolami I, Pantanowitz L, Mete O, et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a potential biomarker of disease-free survival in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of PD-L1 immunoexpression in follicular epithelial–derived thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Pathol. 2020;31(3):291–300. doi: 10.1007/s12022-020-09630-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Ziemlewicz TJ, et al. Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation-what should you use and why? Radiographics. 2014;34(5):1344–1362. doi: 10.1148/rg.345140054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



