Table 1.
Comparative Analysis of Key Parameters and Impacts of Nanomaterials in Non-Invasive BCIs
| Materials | Conductivity | Young's Modulus | Stretchability | Stability | Direct Link to Non-Invasive BCI Performance | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgNWs | 2.8 Ω sq−1 | / | Up to 40% | ∆Sheet Resistance ≈ ± 50% @ 100 cycles for 40% | Excellent signal quality; Middle mechanical durability; Middle monitoring density | [181] |
| AgNWs | 3.2–3.6 Ω sq−1 | / | / | 0% increase in fractional resistance during fatigue testing up to 500,000 cycles | Excellent signal quality; Middle mechanical durability; Middle monitoring density | [182] |
| Nickel silicide NWs | 2 × 106 S m−1 | 170 GPa | Up to 50% | ∆R/R0 < ± 1.7% @ 10, 000 cycles for 15% | Good signal quality; Middle mechanical durability; High monitoring density | [178] |
| SiNWs | Several uA under a bias voltage of ± 3 V | 170 GPa | Up to 45% | stable ΔR/R0 @10, 000 cycles for 10% | Good signal quality; Middle mechanical durability; High monitoring density | [152] |
| PEDOT/PSS hydrogels | 23.7 S m−1 | 8–374 kPa | Up to 100% | / | Good signal quality; Good mechanical durability; Middle monitoring density | [183] |
| d-Sorbitol-PEDOT/PSS hydrogels | > 1,000 S m−1 | 1.87 MPa | Up to 60% | Strain-insensitive resistance after the initial stretch | Good signal quality; Good mechanical durability; Middle monitoring density | [184] |