Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 12;18:112. doi: 10.1007/s40820-025-01964-1

Table 3.

Light response characteristics of relevant photocatalysts

Materials Bandgap (eV) Light absorption range (nm) Application Rct (Ω) Photocurrent density Stability References
GdVO4 2.2 390–770 SC 4.2 [46]
Ce-doped V2O5 2.23 420–480 SC 0.48 95.2% (5000 cycles) [47]
GO-NiO 2.77 200–700 SC 98% (6000 cycles) [48]
Cu2O/MXn 1.868 300–800 SC 91.01% (5000 cycles) [49]
Fe5%NiO 3.21 375–425 SC [50]
MoS2/Graphene 1.8 200–700 Li–O2 battery [51]
Ag@ZnO 3.11 370–550 Li–O2 battery  ~ 0.042 mA cm−2 93.73% (CE) [52]
NiFe-TiO2 2.73 200–800 Zn-air battery 6 60 cycles (30h) [53]
CoS2/CuS@CNT-C3N4 420–800 Zn-air battery  ~ 0.016 mA cm−2 3800 cycles (643h) [54]
Co3O4

2.20 (Direct)

1.35 (Indirect)

400–755 Zn-air battery 11.1 [55]
Bi2O3/TiO2 3.00 250–452  ~ 3250 0.56 mA cm−2 [56]
Cu2O/WO3/TiO2 2.35 415–515 SC 208.10 1.40 mA cm−2 95.17% (1000 cycles) [57]
MoS2/TiO2 3.19  ~ 1800 [58]
CTH/MoS2-TAA 1.90 (3D MoS2) 350–750 SC 0.1 97.5% (10,000 cycles) [59]
6% Fe-doped CeO2 2.43 SC 99.36% (100 cycles) [60]
Al–MnO2 1.40 Zn-ion battery 75.7 30 mA 96% (1000 cycles) [61]
CsPbI1.8Br1.2 1.66 Battery 0.62 [62]

CE means cycle efficiency