Table 3.
Light response characteristics of relevant photocatalysts
| Materials | Bandgap (eV) | Light absorption range (nm) | Application | Rct (Ω) | Photocurrent density | Stability | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GdVO4 | 2.2 | 390–770 | SC | 4.2 | [46] | ||
| Ce-doped V2O5 | 2.23 | 420–480 | SC | 0.48 | 95.2% (5000 cycles) | [47] | |
| GO-NiO | 2.77 | 200–700 | SC | 98% (6000 cycles) | [48] | ||
| Cu2O/MXn | 1.868 | 300–800 | SC | 91.01% (5000 cycles) | [49] | ||
| Fe5%NiO | 3.21 | 375–425 | SC | [50] | |||
| MoS2/Graphene | 1.8 | 200–700 | Li–O2 battery | [51] | |||
| Ag@ZnO | 3.11 | 370–550 | Li–O2 battery | ~ 0.042 mA cm−2 | 93.73% (CE) | [52] | |
| NiFe-TiO2 | 2.73 | 200–800 | Zn-air battery | 6 | 60 cycles (30h) | [53] | |
| CoS2/CuS@CNT-C3N4 | 420–800 | Zn-air battery | ~ 0.016 mA cm−2 | 3800 cycles (643h) | [54] | ||
| Co3O4 |
2.20 (Direct) 1.35 (Indirect) |
400–755 | Zn-air battery | 11.1 | [55] | ||
| Bi2O3/TiO2 | 3.00 | 250–452 | ~ 3250 | 0.56 mA cm−2 | [56] | ||
| Cu2O/WO3/TiO2 | 2.35 | 415–515 | SC | 208.10 | 1.40 mA cm−2 | 95.17% (1000 cycles) | [57] |
| MoS2/TiO2 | 3.19 | ~ 1800 | [58] | ||||
| CTH/MoS2-TAA | 1.90 (3D MoS2) | 350–750 | SC | 0.1 | 97.5% (10,000 cycles) | [59] | |
| 6% Fe-doped CeO2 | 2.43 | SC | 99.36% (100 cycles) | [60] | |||
| Al–MnO2 | 1.40 | Zn-ion battery | 75.7 | 30 mA | 96% (1000 cycles) | [61] | |
| CsPbI1.8Br1.2 | 1.66 | Battery | 0.62 | [62] |
CE means cycle efficiency