Technical problem
|
49
|
Complex cases are unsuitable for pooling; routine are
|
26
|
Different operating technique/standard of surgeons
|
16
|
Different listing criteria
|
7
|
Alternative strategy
|
27
|
Referrals to consultant with shortest wait
|
6
|
Find cause of disparity/proper finance/other
procedures more important
|
6
|
Use pooled staff-grade lists for long waiters
|
7
|
Flexible sessions, clinic vs theatre
|
1
|
Pool referrals
|
4
|
Prioritize individuals on need
|
2
|
Pool new cases only
|
1
|
Devalues operation/operator
|
14
|
Increases disparity in workload (encourages lazy surgeons)
|
13
|
General practitioners or patients say in matter
|
11
|
Complaints/medicolegal
|
9
|
Suitability to particular unit/no need
|
8
|
Inefficiency (increases clinic visits/time elsewhere to see patient)
|
6
|
Reduced standard of care
|
2
|
Miscellaneous
|
9
|
I do more complex cases for some of my colleagues
|
1
|
Lead to competition to corner the cataract market
|
1
|
Patient care compromised, so only if waiting list long
|
1
|
Patients should be given the choice
|
1
|
Undermine patients' confidence by seeing different
doctor
|
1
|
I've never understood the waiting list
|
1
|
Large geographic areas, not practical
|
1
|
Consultants could abdicate responsibility for patients
in a pool
|
1
|
Lack of continuity of care
|
1
|