Skip to main content
. 2002 Dec;95(12):598–600. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.12.598

Table 1.

Consultants' comments regarding pooled lists

Comment No.
Technical problem 49
    Complex cases are unsuitable for pooling; routine are 26
    Different operating technique/standard of surgeons 16
    Different listing criteria 7
Alternative strategy 27
    Referrals to consultant with shortest wait 6
    Find cause of disparity/proper finance/other procedures more important 6
    Use pooled staff-grade lists for long waiters 7
    Flexible sessions, clinic vs theatre 1
    Pool referrals 4
    Prioritize individuals on need 2
    Pool new cases only 1
Devalues operation/operator 14
Increases disparity in workload (encourages lazy surgeons) 13
General practitioners or patients say in matter 11
Complaints/medicolegal 9
Suitability to particular unit/no need 8
Inefficiency (increases clinic visits/time elsewhere to see patient) 6
Reduced standard of care 2
Miscellaneous 9
    I do more complex cases for some of my colleagues 1
    Lead to competition to corner the cataract market 1
    Patient care compromised, so only if waiting list long 1
    Patients should be given the choice 1
    Undermine patients' confidence by seeing different doctor 1
    I've never understood the waiting list 1
    Large geographic areas, not practical 1
    Consultants could abdicate responsibility for patients in a pool 1
    Lack of continuity of care 1