Abstract
Concrete plays a critical role in nuclear power plants (NPPs) as structural material and radiation shielding. Severe defects during construction of NPP concrete could lead to catastrophic leakages. Therefore, cement plaster propably with acceptable radiation protection could be a good solution as a repairing technique. Thus, this study investigates the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of non-conventional cementitious plaster incorporating magnetite powder as a partial/full replacement for traditional sand. Five cement plaster mixtures were proposed with varying proportions of magnetite powder and sand, in which their mechanical and radiation attenuation properties were analyzed. Experimental evaluations including workability, density, compressive strength, and gamma-ray attenuation were investigated. Furthermore, γ-ray and fast neutron shielding has been evaluated using software programs such as EpiXS, NXCom, and MRCsC. Results showed that incorporating magnetite powder in cement plaster production lowers the compactness of the matrix by up to 46.2%. Consequently, the compressive strength was generally decreased by up to 65.4% with increased magnetite content. However, the density of the plaster was increased by up to 48.7% compared to traditional cement plaster. Furthermore, owing to increased density, the radiation shielding efficiency of magnetite cement plaster was generally enhanced. Cement plaster with 100% magnetite content achieved superior linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) for gamma rays with 264% increase at 0.01 MeV and 43% increase at 10 MeV compared to the traditional sand plaster. Also it acquired better fast neutron shielding performance, with a macroscopic removal cross-section (ΣR) of 0.1056 cm⁻¹ (11% increase) compared to the conventional plaster. This research highlights the potential of utilizing magnetite-cement plaster with enhanced radiation shielding properties for repair and maintenance strategies of NPP structures. With the achieved gamma and neutron shielding properties, such material can significantly improve safety, durability, and longevity of nuclear power plant structures.
Keywords: Magnetite powder, Cement plaster, Mechanical properties, Radiation shielding, NPP structures
Subject terms: Engineering, Materials science, Physics
Introduction
Concrete is a primary structural material in nuclear power plants (NPPs) which are used for structures and biological shielding. Containment structures, a key application, are designed to withstand extreme events and act as the final barrier against radioactive release. To ensure their leak-tightness and structural integrity, age-related degradation of concrete containment buildings (CCBs) must be controlled. Issues from construction quality control and operational ageing can impair a containment’s response to accidents, reducing its structural margins. Thus, researchers aim to develop cement-based materials with enhanced radiation attenuation to enhance and repair nuclear installation structures. This involves implementing new materials with favorable absorption properties to improve durability against radiation and then ensuring safe and reliable nuclear structures1,2.
Therefore, many investigations have focused on concrete and other cement-based composites performance against radiation. For instance, Tousi et al.3 studied the effect of partial replacemet of cement with magnetite powder. The study revealed that replacing 20% of cement with magnetite improved gamma-ray shielding by up to 43%. Although magnetite can cause a slight reduction in strength compared to other mixtures, the resulting cementitious composite remains stronger than regular ones. Similarly, Barforoush et al.4 found that the addition of basalt fibres to high-performance concrete containing magnetite fine aggregate improved its ductility, stiffness, and radiation shielding. This mixture achieved up to a 5% increase in gamma-rays attenuation at energy levels of 1173 and 1332 keV. Moreover, Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka et al.5 investigated how the composition of concrete, specifically the type of coarse aggregate and cement, affects its durability and safety in nuclear facilities. The research focused on two key properties: gas permeability (to prevent radioactive leaks) and gamma radiation shielding. The findings showed that the choice of aggregate and cement significantly influences the concrete’s density, which in turn affects its gas permeability and radiation shielding effectiveness (measured by the half-value layer). The results are intended to help develop safer, more durable, and cost-effective concrete for nuclear constructions. Furthermore, Ghorbani et al.6 investigated the mechanical, fracture, and radiation shielding properties of concrete incorporating magnetite and hematite as heavyweight aggregates and nano-silica as a partial cement replacement. It was revealed that adding up to 6% of nano-silica increased fracture energy by 18.8% and 16.8% for the magnetite and hematite concretes, respectively. In terms of radiation shielding, the magnetite-based concrete demonstrated superior performance compared to the hematite-based concrete across all energy levels. This shielding advantage was further enhanced with the addition of nano-silica, as the material’s reduced porosity led to a consistent decrease in the passing radiation flux. Also, the most effective radiation attenuation was observed with a 4% addition of nano-silica.
The affected radiological and physico-mechanical due to incorporating other materials in concrete production were also illustrated. For instance, Shalbi et al.7 found that varying colemanite ratios in barite-concrete affect neutron and gamma shielding but reduce its mechanical strength. Only one mix of 46.95% barite and 1.85% colemanite met all performance criteria for nuclear facility use. Also, Othman et al.8 demonstrated that substituting aggregates with lead oxide increased concrete density, compressive strength, and gamma-ray shielding efficiency, while also improving hardness and reducing radiation intensity. Likewise, the addition of varying concentrations of tungsten oxide to heavy concrete increased the density as well as the photon shielding capability. The increase in the amount of tungsten oxide caused a reduction in the half-value layer and an increase in the radiation protection efficiency for concrete9. Furthermore, recent studies proved that boron carbide (B4C), a material renowned for its neutron attenuation properties as a fine aggregate replacement in concrete, enhanced the neutron shielding performance of concrete and other cement-based plasters10.
Also, Fattouh et al.11 explored how modifying the aggregate gradation of 100% recycled concrete aggregate affects concrete performance. It was revealed that the mechanical properties and radiation shielding significantly improved. Microstructural analysis confirmed denser cement matrices and refined interfacial zones in the recycled concrete mixes. The recycled concrete with the most adjusted gradation showed the best radiation shielding performance. Moreover, Fathy et al.12 evaluated the performance of high-strength concrete (HSC) incorporating two distinct nanomaterials: nano-lead monoxide (NL) and nano-granodiorite powder (NG). Each was tested separately at replacement levels up to 5% of cement weight, and an optimised hybrid mix (5% NL + 4% NG) was also developed. It was revealed that NG significantly improved compressive strength, peaking at a 17.3% increase at 4% replacement. However, NL showed a smaller strength gain of 7.96% at 3%, with strength decreasing beyond that point. Also, NL showed increased workability and delayed setting times, while NG had the opposite effect. The combined mix achieved an 11.7% strength increase and delivered superior gamma-ray shielding.
In addition to the former, as a shielding membrane for concrete structures, vast investigations considered using materials with high density to enhance radiation attenuation of cement plaster. For example, Sikora et al.13 investigated experimentally the effects of incorporating iron oxide nanoparticles (NPs) on the neutron and gamma-ray shielding properties of cement plaster. Cement plasters were prepared with nanomagnetite replacing of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30% by weight of cement. The results revealed that higher Fe3O4-NP content progressively increased viscosity, yield stress, total porosity, and average pore volume, while substantially delaying early strength development and reducing 7 and 28 day compressive strength. Conversely, radiation shielding performance improved significantly, with linear increases in macroscopic cross-sections for slow, fast, and thermal neutrons, and enhanced gamma-ray attenuation across the 0.08–2.614 MeV energy range. The study showed also that Fe3O4 nanoparticles effectively produce lead-free cementitious composites with superior radiation shielding, though the associated increase in porosity and reduction in mechanical performance must be considered13. The results agreed with those of Kunchariyakun et al.14, who studied how adding nano-magnetite (nano-Fe3O4) to mortars, at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10% by weight of cement, affected their γ and neutron-radiation shielding capabilities. The results showed that the radiation-shielding properties of the mortar were improved with the addition of nano-Fe3O4 through pore filling and nucleation effects. The best physical, compressive, and radiation shielding properties were achieved with a 5% addition of nano-Fe3O4, which increased the material’s photon linear attenuation coefficient from 0.144 cm−1 to 0.155 cm−1. The compressive strength was 216.79 ± 6.19 ksc at 28 days. The neutrons’ fast neutron removal cross-section (ΣR) increased from 0.1109 cm−1 in the control sample to 0.1192 cm−1 with the addition of 5% nano-Fe3O4. Based on these findings, nano-Fe3O4 added to mortar may reduce the effects of radioactive waste on people and the environment by attenuating gamma rays instead of neutrons. This could pave the way for new radiation-shielding materials for radioactive storage facilities14. While, in a different approach, Ali et al.15 studied experimentally the effects of implementing sustainable powders on radiation shielding parameters of cement plaster. It was concluded that the addition of nano-titanium to conventional plaster led to superior enhancement in the compressive strength relative to traditional plaster. Conversely, fully replacing conventional silica sand with powdery materials - steel slag, hematite, and bentonite - generally reduced the compressive strength of cementitious plasters. However, the radiation shielding properties have been enhanced by up to 26%.
In summary, although there have been extensive investigations on the radiation shielding properties of concrete and other cement-based composites. However, there is a lack of information regarding the radiation shielding chracteristics of cement plaster produced with magnetite powder as a sustainable replacer/contender for traditional sand. Such plaster can be easily formed and used for repairing structures in nuclear applications. During the construction of nuclear power plant projects, there are some structural elements with radiation protection properties such as the reinforced concrete walls of the reactor core cavity or spent fuel pools. It was revealed that there are always common mistakes and defects during construction of such concrete elements (e.g. honey- combs, hair cracks, segregation, etc.). Therefore, cementitious plasters propably with acceptable radiation protection must be used in such repairing applications. Also, the design of cement plasters’ radiation shields should be appropriate for the integration of these reinforced concrete elements.
Therefore, the aim of this research is to present a sustainable cement plaster mixtures, produced with nationaly available magnetite powder, probably with proper static performance and radiation shielding capabilities. Such plasters extremly necessary for structural elements that develop defects either during construction or after the operation of nuclear power plants.
Materials and methods
Materials
Portland Cement CEM-I was utilized in this study. Its physical properties is presented in Table 1 while, its chemical composition determined via X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis, is demonstrated in Table 2.
Table 1.
Physical properties of utilized cement.
| Item | Unit | Test Result |
|---|---|---|
| Fineness, Blaine | cm2/gm | 3550 |
| Initial Setting Time | Minutes | 170 |
| Soundness Expansion | Mm | 1 |
| Water consistency | % | 27 |
| Loss on ignition | % | 1.6 |
| Particle size | microns | 15 |
Data are presented as median (interquartile range). * Comparison of the differences between AFC3D and AFC2D, Significance is indicated by P < 0.05 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). AFC, antral follicle count; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
Table 2.
Chemical composition of utilized cement.
| Oxides | Test Result % |
|---|---|
| SiO2 | 20.55 |
| Al2O3 | 5.58 |
| Fe2O3 | 4.33 |
| CaO | 58.91 |
| MgO | 1.33 |
| SO3 | 3.39 |
| Na2O | 0.45 |
| K2O | 0.25 |
Also, natural siliceous sand as fine aggregate with specific gravity of 2.65, maximum nominal size of 0.2 mm and water absorption% of 0.4, in accordance with ASTM D7516 was used in this research work. Moreover, nationally available magnetite powder (shown in Fig. 1) with specific gravity of 5.1 was implemented in cement plaster production. The utilized magnetite powder has an average particle size of 825 μm and 5.17 gm/cm3 real density.
Fig. 1.

Utilized magnetite powder.
The idea behind utilizing magnetite powder in this study as a contender for traditional silica sand is due to its high abundance, low price, high content of iron and possibility of use without further processing, which makes it a suitable option for making cementitious composites that protect against radiation17–19. The analyzed chemical composition via X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) of the utilized magnetite powder is presented in Table 3, while Fig. 2 demonstrates the sieve analysis distribution of the utilized sand and magnetite powder.
Table 3.
Chemical composition of magnetite powder.
| Oxide type | Result % |
|---|---|
| Na2O | 0.3 |
| MgO | 0.8 |
| Al2O3 | 2.6 |
| SiO2 | 8.17 |
| P2O5 | 0.12 |
| SO3 | 0.01 |
| K2O | 0.3 |
| CaO | 2.12 |
| TiO2 | 18.8 |
| MnO | 0.4 |
| Fe2O3 | 63.3 |
| ZrO2 | 0.11 |
| PbO | 0.51 |
| Bi2O3 | 0.44 |
| LOI | 1.21 |
Fig. 2.
Particle size distribution of utilized sand and magnetite powder.
Design of the proposed cement plaster mixtures
This experimental research develops non-conventional cement plaster mixtures with magnetite powder as a partial replacement for traditional silica sand. Then, it assesses the mechanical and radiation shielding characteristics of proposed mixtures. The cement plaster mixtures were formulated in accordance with the ACI 211.120 guidelines, which provide a flexible framework for concrete mix design. Although this standard was originally intended for concrete, its guidelines can be adapted for cement plaster through a series of steps aimed at achieving optimal strength and workability. As per the guidelines, a volumetric ratio of 1:3 to 1:4 (cement to fine aggregates) is typically recommended for cement plaster design. In this study, a 1:3 ratio was employed to achieve the proper strength.
Five different cement plaster mixtures were prepared from silica sand and magnetite powder (a mineral whose primary component is iron oxide). The proposed mix constituents, including silica sand, magnetite powder, and water, were presented as a ratio to cement content in the mixtures in Table 4.
Table 4.
Proposed cement plaster constituent proportions.
| Content/ Mix ID | Cement | Sand | Magnetite Powder | Water |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP | 1 | 3 | – | 0.5 |
| MP25 | 1 | 2.25 | 0.75 | 0.5 |
| MP50 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| MP75 | 1 | 0.75 | 2.25 | 0.5 |
| MP100 | 1 | – | 3 | 0.5 |
Preparation, mixing and curing
All cement plaster ingredients were firstly prepared and weighted for each mixture. A step by step mixing technique was followed to acheive adequate consistency. For instance, the silica sand and magnetite powder underwent dry mixing for one minute to promote uniform dispersion and prevent agglomeration. The uniform dispersion of magnetite powder through the mixtures led to convert the grey colored traditional cement plaster (NP) into darker/black colored mixtures based on the magnetite content within the mixture as shown in Fig. 3. Thereafter, cement was then incorporated and mixed for two additional minutes to achieve comprehensive integration and effective blending with dry fine constituents. The dry constituents of the proposed plaster mixtures were blended using a concrete mixer to ensure uniform distribution and minimize segregation. Then, pre-measured quantities of water were subsequently added to complete the mixture. Finally, the fresh plaster was poured into moulds and compacted using a mechanical vibrator to eliminate any entrapped air, thereby ensuring a dense and homogeneous structure. The upper surface of specimens was smoothed using a trowel to ensure geometric uniformity, which is essential for consistent testing outcomes. After 24 h, the specimens were demoulded and subsequently immersed in a water tank as shown in Fig. 3. They were maintained at a stable temperature of 25 ± 2 °C and a relative humidity exceeding 95%. This controlled environment provided ideal conditions for the hydration process and strength development by mitigating moisture loss and temperature variability. Specimens remained submerged until their respective testing intervals to ensure adequate curing and optimal mechanical performance.
Fig. 3.
Production and curing of test specimens.
Testing
The tested specimens in this research work have two different shapes: (a) standard cubes (100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm) and (b) cylinders with a standard diameter of 100 mm and different thicknesses of 20 mm, 40 mm, and 60 mm. The cubes were prepared and tested to measure compressive strength and density, while the cylinders were prepared and tested to evaluate radiation shielding characteristics against gamma radiation. Three identical specimens were prepared from each mixture as the measurements were performed on identical triplicates, resulting in 6 cubes and 12 cylinders per mix design. In total, 30 cubes and 60 cyinders were cast and tested in this research to provide a comprehensive dataset for evaluating the mechanical characteristics and shielding behavior of the proposed cement plasters with varying thicknesses.
Workability test
Flow table tests were applied in this study, as presented in Fig. 4, to evaluate the effect of magnetite powder incorporation on the flowability of freshly mixed cement plaster mixtures as per the guidelines of ASTM C230 (Standard Specification for Flow Table for Use in Tests of Hydraulic Cement)21.
Fig. 4.
Applied fow table test.
Density measurments
The density of different cement plaster mixtures was determined by measuring the mass of a standard cube of cement plaster using a calibrated scale divided by its volume. This approach ensures precise density measurements, which are crucial for radiation shielding analytical assessments.
Compressive strength test
In this study, the compressive strength of various cement plaster mixtures was determined according to ASTM C39 guidelines22. The testing equipment used for the aforementioned test was a 2000 KN universal testing machine as shown in Fig. 5. The test was performed using a set of three cubic specimens (100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm) for each cement plaster mixture at curing ages of 7 and 28 days.
Fig. 5.

Compressive strength testing technique
Radiation shielding experimental testing
Cylindrical specimens of 100 mm diameter and varying thicknesses were prepared for each cement plaster mix with age of 28 days and tested at specific γ-radiation energies. The examined γ-rays energies along with their radioactive sources are; 0.662 MeV for Cesium (Cs-137), and 1.173 and 1.332 MeV for cobalt (Co-60) sources, respectively (Fig. 6). The utilized detector through the attenuation measurements is HPGe semiconductor detector linked to a multichannel analyzer with Genie-2000 software (version 1.1.2, Canberra 2010). After subtracting the background radiation, the γ-rays that were emitted by sources without a shield and by uncollided beams that passed through various sample thicknesses were all recorded. An additional 100 × 100 mm2 lead collimator was used to shield the detector from scattered gamma rays and background radiation, allowing for precise measurements, and a 100 × 100 mm2 lead holder (source collimator) with a 3 mm diameter aperture was used to secure the gamma radioactive source27. A horizontal straight alignment of the experimental setup components was used in conjunction with collimators to achieve accurate shielding parameters for the studied mixtures. This was done solely to maintain a narrow beam geometry and ignore build-up factors. Each measurement was repeated three times and the average has been taken as the representative value while the standard deviation has been considered as the indicator for the uncertinity. A fixed distance of 290 mm was maintained between the source and the front face of the detector, as shown in Fig. 6, and the gamma-rays beam, samples, and detector were all positioned on a horizontal plane. In order to obtain transmission curves, the intensity of uncollided γ-rays that passed through the material at different thicknesses was evaluated using the Beer-Lambert Equatio23,24.
Fig. 6.
Experimental setup of gamma rays attenuation measurements.
Then, the linear attenuation coefficient (µ) at the studied energy for each sample could be calculated based on the following Beer–Lambert Eqs25,26.
![]() |
1 |
where (Ix) is the intensity of transmitted γ-photons through the material after subtracting any counts due to the background radiation, (Io) is the intensity of the primary γ-rays emitted from the source after subtracting any counts due to the background radiation, (x) is the attenuator thickness, and (µ) is the linear attenuation coefficient. In order to minimize the primary radiation to half (HVL) or tenth (TVL) of its initial value and determine the necessary shield thickness to achieve safe doses25–27.The following equations can be used to calculate both shielding thicknesses as follows27:
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
3 |
Analytical assessment of radiation shielding
The radiation shielding analytical assessment was performed through this study in order to verify the experimental investigation then to proceed further with the study to assess the shielding capabilities of the prepared cement plaster mixes at wide range of energies. Some of the most significant shielding parameters, including the linear attenuation coefficient (µ), the effective atomic number (Zeff), and the macroscopic fast neutrons removal cross-section (ΣR), were obtained through analytical means by utilizing dependable software tools. These tools rely on validated analytical and semi-empirical models, cross-sectional databases, and/or rigid simulation engines to compute the necessary shielding parameters. Examples of such tools include EpiXS28, NXCom29, MRCsC30. One of the most important aspects of performing these analytical calculations employing such reliable software tools is the assessment during the initial design phase of the shield. Also another privilege is the possibility to expand the study at wide range of energies that can’t be experimentally done easily due to the lack of radioactive sources that can cover all these energies beside the high costs and prolonged testing time31,32.
The γ-rays shielding properties of the prepared samples were evaluated using EpiXS software which is a Windows-based interpolation software employing the EPICS2017 cross-sectional database33. This user-friendly software, available for download from the Philippine Nuclear Research Institute, calculates various photon shielding parameters, including linear attenuation coefficient (LAC), mass attenuation coefficient (MAC), half-value layer (HVL), tenth-value layer (TVL), mean free path (MFP), effective atomic number (Zeff), and buildup factors (e.g., energy absorption buildup factor (EABF) and exposure buildup factor (EBF)). The inputs needed are simply the chemical compositions of the shield understudy and its density33. On the other hand, for fast neutrons removal assessment, both NXCom29 and MRCsC30 softwares were employed as the former tool can set the lower limit and the latter one can set the upper limit for a range through which the accurate value of the macroscopic fast neutron removal cross-section (ΣR) should lie19,23,26. Both programs need only the composition of the shield and its corresponding density to calculate the characteristic (ΣR) employing an equation depends on a linear summation method as follows30 ;
![]() |
4 |
Where; ρs is the shield density (g/cm3), wi and (ΣR/ρ)i are the weight fraction and mass removal cross-section of the ith element, respectively.
Experimental results
Workability
The relative reduction in flow diameter for the different cement plaster mixtures relative to that of the normal cement plaster (NP / control) specimen is presented in Fig. 7. The flowability tests showed that the control (NP) mixture could flow under its self-weight, while the replacement of silica sand with magnetite powder (partially or totally) led to an overall reduction in workability as shown in the figure. For instance, the flow of the mixture MP25, which has partial replacement of silica sand by 25% of magnetite powder, was decreased by about 5.8% compared to that of the control NP mixture. Similarly, the flowability decreased by about 16.5%, 32.6% and 46.2% due to 50%, 75% and 100% magnetite powder replacement, respectively, compared to that of the NP mixture, which was made with silica sand alone. This reduction in flowability could be attributed to the incorporation of fine magnetite powder, which increases the specific surface area of the mixtures, consequently increasing their water demand, which may lead to reduced workability of the fresh matrix. It should be noted also that the reduction in flowability can affect the compactness of the matrix, acting as an exogenous parameter, which generally affects the mechanical performance.
Fig. 7.
Relative reduction in flowability of different cement plaster mixtures.
Density
Figure 8 illustrates the density of different cement plaster mixtures incorporating silica sand and/or magnetite powder. It was revealed that all magnetite powder mixtures achieved higher density compared to the control mixture, which was produced with silica sand only, as shown in the figure. For example, the implementation of magnetite powder by 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% replacement with silica sand increased the density of the cement matrix by about 15.5%, 30.9%, 41.6%, and 48.7%, respectively, compared to that of the NP control mixture. This could be attributed to the incorporation of magnetite powder in cement plaster production, which is a black obaque mineral with a metallic lustre, a high specific gravity of 5.1 (twice that of normal silica sand), a high surface area and micro-filling capability.
Fig. 8.
Density of various cement plaster mixtures.
Compressive strength
The compressive strength test was applied on the different cement plaster specimens at 7 and 28 days of maturity. Figure 9 displays the variation in compressive strength test results at different ages. As shown in the figure, the achieved compressive strength at 28 days was generally higher than that obtained at 7 days for all mixtures. This behavior is attributed to the formation of hydration products and domination of hydrated calcium silicate (C-S-H gel) among these hydration products. Also, it was revealed that the implementation of magnetite powder in cement plaster production generally reduced the compressive strength of the mixtures at all testing ages, as illustrated in the figure. For instance, at the testing age of 7 days, the compressive strength of cement plaster mixtures incorporating 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% magnetite powder as a partial replacement of silica sand decreased by about 18.2%, 37.7%, 52.3%, and 65.4% relative to that of the normal cement plaster mixture (control). Similarly, the compressive strength of MP25, MP50, MP75, and MP100 was reduced by about 17.7%, 36.8%, 50.9%, and 64.5% compared to the NP control matrix at 28 days of maturity. The general reduction in compressive strength of cement plaster could be attributed, based on the abovementioned discussion, to the workability reduction (due to the implementation of fine magnetite powder, which increases the specific surface area of the mixtures), which can lower the compactness of cement plaster, thus resulting in a dramatic reduction in the compressive strength of the matrix. Similar conclusions were drawn elsewere15. Based on the aforementioned results and following the ACI 318 standard, incorporating magnetite powder by up to 100% as a replacement for conventional sand still achieved the minimum requirements of cement plasters’ compressive strength for non-load-bearing radiation shielding layers (non-structural applications).
Fig. 9.
Compressive strength of different cement plaster mixtures at 7 and 28 days.
Experimental results of gamma rays’ shielding
The absolute value of the slope of the optimally fitted curve has been taken as the linear attenuation coefficient at the energy of the corresponding photons. This conclusion was reached on the basis of the transmission curves that are shown in Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.
Experimental transmission curves of γ-rays relative intensity versus the thickness of cement plaster mixtures.
After that, the EpiXS software program was employed to compute the µ at the studied three gamma rays’ energies just for verification and to give the green light to proceed with the wider analytical investigation.
The experimentally and analytically obtained (µ) values are presented in Table 5 along with the calculated difference percentages to assess the agreement between the two calculating methods.
Table 5.
Compatibility of experimental and analytical results
| Mixture ID | LAC (cm− 1) at 0.661 MeV | LAC (cm− 1) at 1.173 MeV | LAC (cm− 1) at 1.333 MeV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIXS | Exp. | Percent Diff. | EPIXS | Exp. | Percent Diff. | EPIXS | Exp. | Percent Diff. | |
| NP | 0.177 | 0.161 | 9.47 | 0.134 | 0.122 | 9.37 | 0.126 | 0.121 | 4.05 |
| MP25 | 0.171 | 0.166 | 2.97 | 0.139 | 0.133 | 4.41 | 0.13 | 0.124 | 4.72 |
| MP50 | 0.197 | 0.181 | 8.47 | 0.150 | 0.147 | 2.02 | 0.140 | 0.128 | 8.96 |
| MP75 | 0.202 | 0.192 | 5.08 | 0.153 | 0.153 | 0.00 | 0.143 | 0.133 | 7.25 |
| MP100 | 0.209 | 0.195 | 6.93 | 0.158 | 0.157 | 0.63 | 0.148 | 0.138 | 6.99 |
Based on the obtained results shown in the former table, it could be observed the high compatibility between the experimentally obtained values and the analytically computed ones as the maximum percent difference detected was below 10% which proves the precission of the experimental setup used for the radiation attenuation measurements and also ensures the accuracy of the physicochemical characterizations of the prepared cement plasters. Also, increasing the magnetite content in the studied mixes shows increase in the value of the linear attenuation coefficient thus, improving the shielding capability of the cement plaster against the incident gamma rays. However, increasing the energy of the incident gamma radiation led to a notable decrease in the attenuation capability of the shielding cement plaster in general as the escaping probability of the incident photon increases due to the decrease in the interaction time with the shield constituents especially that the three studied energies are dominated by the Compton scattering mechanism which is the least dependent mechanism on the shield composition/effective atomic number.
Analytical assessment of gamma rays’ shielding
The computed gamma rays shielding parameters; µ, HVL, MFP, and Zeff, are shown in; Figs. 11, 12, 13, and 14, respectively.
Fig. 11.
Evaluated LAC values for cement plaster mixtures using EpiXS software at the studied energy range.
Fig. 12.
Evaluated HVL values for cement plaster mixtures using EpiXS software at the studied energy range.
Fig. 13.
Evaluated MFP values for cement plaster mixtures using EpiXS software at the studied energy range.
Fig. 14.
Evaluated Zeff values for cement plaster mixtures using EpiXS software.
Considering the gamma rays shielding properties of the studied samples, increasing the energy of the incident gamma radiation led to a decrease in the value of the computed µ for all samples. The µ drops from 57.8 to 0.047 cm−1 for (NP), 91.36 to 0.051 cm−1 for (MP25), from 131.4 to 0.058 cm−1 for (MP50), from 168.3 to 0.062 cm−1 for (MP75), and from 210.8 to 0.067 cm−1 for (MP100) at gamma rays’ energies range from 0.01 to 10 MeV. The rate of the mentioned decrease in µ values has been observed to be the greatest at low energies as the dominant mechanism at this energy range is the photoelectric mechanism which inversely correlates with Eγ3.5. Also the differences considering the linear attenuation coefficients are the biggest at this energy range as the photoelectric mechanism is in a direct proportionality with Z4.5 so, it significantly correlates with the effective atomic number of the studied cement plaster24,34. However, at the intermediate energy range, the aforementioned decreasing rate becomes lower and the differences among the studied cement plaster samples become smaller as the dominant mechanism is the Compton scattering mechanism whose dependency on the effective atomic number and the energy of the incident gamma rays is the least. A slight reincrease at the end of the studied energy range has been observed especially with increasing the magnetite content in the sample due to the increase in the contribution degree of the pair production mechanism which is proportional to the squared value of the atomic number of the attenuating medium. For all energies, especially at the lowest energies, it can be noted that increasing magnetite content increases the shielding effectiveness of the studied cement plaster as the constituent of the high-Z elements (Fe) increases which increases the effective atomic number of the studied cement plaster beside increasing the density.
It does make sense that both; HVL, which is the shield thickness required to attenuate half of the incident gamma rays, and the MFP, which is the average distance that can be traveled by the energetic photon in the attenuating medium without making any interaction, decrease with increasing the magnetite content in the sample due to the corresponding increase in the shielding efficiency.
The experimental findings obtained in this study were compared with a wide range of previously published research to validate the observed trends and place the results within the broader scientific context. The reduction in workability associated with increasing magnetite content aligns with the observations reported by Sikora et al.13, who demonstrated that incorporating Fe3O4 nanoparticles increases viscosity and reduces early-age flowability due to the higher specific surface area of magnetite particles. Similarly, the notable increase in the density of the prepared plasters is consistent with earlier investigations on magnetite- and heavyweight-aggregate-based composites, where magnetite was shown to significantly enhance unit weight and consequently improve radiation attenuation performance6,17,18. Regarding compressive strength, the decreasing trend recorded for mixtures with higher magnetite replacement agrees with findings by Ali et al.15 and Ghorbani et al.6, who attributed strength reduction to lower compactness and less efficient particle packing in magnetite-rich matrices. Despite this reduction, the obtained strengths remain within acceptable limits for non-load-bearing shielding applications, which supports similar recommendations in the literature for heavy or radiation-protective coatings. The γ-ray attenuation results also follow expected behavior and support conclusions from previous studies, where magnetite, hematite, and other iron-rich minerals were shown to markedly enhance linear attenuation coefficients, particularly at low photon energies dominated by the photoelectric effect4,6. The superior shielding efficiency of the MP100 mixture corresponds with the strong correlation between effective atomic number, material density, and photon interaction probability, as confirmed by EpiXS-based analytical assessments and previously reported datasets23,27.
Analytical assessment of fast neutrons’ shielding
The macroscopic fast neutrons removal cross-section (FCS) was computed for all prepared cement plaster samples employing NXCom and MRCsC software programs as shown in Fig. 15; Table 6. The MP100 sample was found having the highest value for FCS (0.1073 cm− 1) compared to the other prepared samples, and thus, the lowest value for the relaxation length (λ) (93.2 mm). Considering that almost all prepared mixes have the same water and light elements’ content, the possible reason for the superior fast neutrons attenuation capability of MP100 plaster sample is that it has the highest magnetite content thus, the highest content of iron compared to the other mixes along with the highest density. Iron has notable microscopic fast neutrons removal cross-section compared to the other intermediate and high-Z elements due to its appreciated inelastic scattering cross-section as a primary mode of interaction with the incident fast neutrons. Also, based on the linear summation rule that was discussed before, there is a direct correlation between FCS and the density of the shield as higher density of the shield means higher nuclear density thus, increase in the interaction probability between the incident energetic neutron and the shield.
Fig. 15.
NXCom and MRCsC results for all cement plaster mixtures.
Table 6.
Evaluated FCS for cement plaster Mixtures using NXCom and MRCsC softwares.
| Mixture ID | FCS (cm− 1) | Avg. value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NXCom (lower limit) | MRCsC (upper limit) | ||
| NP | 0.0953 | 0.0983 | 0.0968 |
| MP25 | 0.0957 | 0.1006 | 0.0982 |
| MP50 | 0.1010 | 0.1065 | 0.1037 |
| MP75 | 0.1017 | 0.1068 | 0.1038 |
| MP100 | 0.1056 | 0.1090 | 0.1073 |
For fast neutron shielding, the enhanced macroscopic removal cross-sections recorded for magnetite-rich mixtures agree with the well-established neutron-moderating role of iron and its substantial inelastic scattering cross-section, a trend further supported by NXCom and MRCsC predictions. This behavior is consistent with earlier studies on heavy concrete mixes containing magnetite and other high-Z aggregates23,31, confirming that magnetite incorporation significantly improves both photon and fast neutron attenuation. Overall, the alignment of the present results with published literature reinforces the validity of the experimental outcomes and highlights the potential of magnetite-based plaster as an efficient composite for radiation shielding applications in nuclear infrastructure.
Conclusions
This study establishes a foundation for a practical use of magnetite-cement plaster in the maintenance and repair of nuclear power plant structures, particularly in repair or retrofitting scenarios where conventional cement plaster is insufficient. The investigated parameter was the feasibility and effectiveness of using magnetite powder as a partial or full replacement for natural silica sand in cement plaster manufacturing. A series of experimental and analytical evaluations were conducted to examine the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of the proposed cement plaster mixtures, supported by software-based calculations using EpiXS, NXCom, and MRCsC. The conclusion was drawn as follows:
The flowability of the cement plaster matrix was generally decreased by up to 46.2% due to implementing the magnetite powders in its production. This can lead to less effective compactness, therefore affecting the mechanical properties.
The MP100 mixture achieved the highest density (48.7% higher than normal cement plaster) among all other mixtures owing to full replacement of silica sand with magnetite powder. This directly correlated with enhanced radiation attenuation performance.
Generally, the compressive strength of cement plaster mixtures decreased by up to 65.4% as magnetite content increased, which could be attributed to the decreased compactness and packing density.
Results from experimental gamma-ray attenuation tests showed excellent agreement with the analytical predictions from EpiXS, with percentage differences generally within acceptable ranges (below 10%). The combination of experimental validation and software analysis confirmed the reliability of magnetite-based cement plasters, considering both photon and fast neutron shielding.
Replacing natural sand with magnetite significantly enhances the radiation shielding properties of cement plaster, with the MP100 mixture (100% magnetite) showing the best performance in both gamma-ray and fast neutron attenuation. The MP100 mixture demonstrated the highest linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) for gamma rays (264% increase at 0.01 MeV and 43% increase at 10 MeV compared to the traditional mix) and the best fast neutron shielding performance, with a macroscopic removal cross-section (ΣR) of 0.1056 cm⁻¹ (11% increase compared to the traditional mix).
Magnetite’s higher density and iron content reduced the mean free path of gamma rays, increased the neutron scattering and improved the shielding efficiency against both energetic photons and fast neutrons.
For optimal mix selection where mechanical strength is critical alongside shielding, a partial replacement ratio of silica sand with magnetite powder by 75% (MP75) provides a good balance between mechanical properties and radiation shielding efficiency since the full replacement (100%) didn’t achieve the structural adequacy.
Finally, this study paves the way for more research on the feasibility of producing non-traditional cement plaster mixtures with enhanced radiation-shielding performance for structural repairs or reinforcement of shielding walls in critical facilities.
Author contributions
Formal analysis and software: E.M.A., M.G.E.S., M.R.; Review of analysis: I.M.N., M.A.E.M.A.; Supervision; Writing-review and editing: E.M.A., M.G.E.S.; Writing-original draft: M.A.E.M.A.; Writing-review and editing: M.R.; All Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This article doesn’t contain any studies involving animals performed by any authors. Also, this article does not contain any studies involving human participants performed by authors.
Consent to participate
All Authors agree to participate in the published version of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Eslam M. Attia, Email: eslam.attia13590@gmail.com
Islam M. Nabil, Email: im2029@fayoum.edu.eg
References
- 1.Naus, D. J. Primer on durability of nuclear power plant reinforced concrete structures-A review of pertinent factors. (2007).
- 2.Zhang, N., She, W., Du, F. & Xu, K. Experimental study on mechanical and functional properties of reduced graphene oxide/cement composites. Materials13 (13), 3015 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tousi, E. T. et al. Investigating the effect of magnetite ore and concrete curing time on the mechanical, environmental, and radiation characteristics of radiation shielding concrete (RSC). Radiat. Phys. Chem.230, 112550 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barforoush, M. J. et al. Experimental investigation of the effect of basalt fibers on the mechanical properties and gamma ray shielding properties of high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete containing magnetite fine particles. Constr. Build. Mater.458, 139551 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka, D. et al. Gas permeability and gamma ray shielding properties of concrete for nuclear applications. Nucl. Eng. Des.429, 113616 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ghorbani, M. et al. Effects of Nanosilica and aggregate type on the mechanical, fracture and shielding features of heavyweight concrete. Nucl. Eng. Des.431, 113713 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shalbi, S. et al. Study on mechanical and shielding properties of barite colemanite concrete. IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng.1106 (1), 012009–p (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Othman, S. A. Effect of lead oxide on concrete density for radiation shielding purposes. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1106(1): p. 012011. (2021).
- 9.Al-Ghamdi, H. et al. Performance of newly developed concretes incorporating WO3 and barite as radiation shielding material. J. Mater. Res. Technol.19, 4103–4114 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gokul, P. Development of boron carbide concrete for enhanced radiation shielding in nuclear reactors. Case Stud. Constr. Mater., : 21, e04354 (2025).
- 11.Fattouh, M. S. et al. Impact of modified aggregate gradation on the workability, mechanical, microstructural and radiation shielding properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Sci. Rep.15 (1), 18428 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fathy, I. N. et al. Upgrading the compressive strength and radiation shielding properties of high strength concrete supported with nano additives of lead monoxide and granodiorite. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 180, 105562 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sikora, P. et al. Rheological, mechanical, microstructural and radiation shielding properties of cement pastes containing magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles. Int. J. Concrete Struct. Mater.17 (1), 7 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kunchariyakun, K. et al. Experimental study of mortar incorporating nano-magnetite on engineering performance and radiation shielding. Nanatechnol. Reviews. 14 (1), 20240135 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ali, A. E. M. et al. Radiation shielding properties of sustainable concrete with novel plastering techniques. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 211, 110958 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 16.ASTM, A. & D75/D75M. Standard Practice for Sampling Aggregates. ASTM international: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009. (2019).
- 17.Mohamed, T. G. et al. Inherent radiological hazard and γ-rays shielding properties of black sand minerals. Egypt. J. Petroleum. 33 (3), 1 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mohamed, T. G. et al. Effect of incorporating black sands (magnetite and ilmenite) into concrete mixtures on their mechanical properties. in 2023 5th Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES). IEEE. (2023).
- 19.El-Feky, M. G. et al. Radioactivity and environmental impacts of granites from um Ara, southeastern desert, Egypt. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. (2022).
- 20.Standard A. Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete. ACI Man. Concr Pract.1996, 1–38 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- 21.ASTM, A. Standard specification for flow table for use in tests of hydraulic cement. ASTM West. Conshohocken, 1. (2014).
- 22.C39/C39M. A., Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens 1. ASTM Stand. B, 2003. i: pp. 1–5.
- 23.El-Samrah, M. et al. Radiation shielding properties of modified concrete mixes and their suitability in dry storage cask. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 148, 104195 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lamarsh, J. R. & Baratta, A. J. Introduction To Nuclear Engineering Vol. 3 (Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001).
- 25.Lamarsh, J. R. Introduction to nuclear engineering. (1975).
- 26.Kaplan, M. F. Concrete radiation shielding. (1989).
- 27.Nabil, I. M. et al. Experimental, analytical, and simulation studies of modified concrete mix for radiation shielding in a mixed radiation field. Sci. Rep.13 (1), 17637 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gili, M. B. Z. & Jecong, J. F. M. Radiation shielding properties of ZnO and other glass modifier oxides: BaO, MgO, Na2O, and TiO2, using EpiXS software. Arab. J. Sci. Eng.48 (1), 1021–1029 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 29.El-Khayatt, A. NXcom–A program for calculating Attenuation coefficients of fast neutrons and gamma-rays. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 38 (1), 128–132 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 30.El-Samrah, M. et al. MRCsC: a user-friendly software for predicting shielding effectiveness against fast neutrons. Radiat. Phys. Chem.182, 109356 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 31.El-Samrah, M. G. et al. Investigation of specially designed bentonite samples as potential bricks with better radiation shielding properties. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 162, 104778 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chidiac, S. et al. Mechanical and radiation shielding properties of concrete containing commercial Boron carbide powder. Constr. Build. Mater.313, 125466 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cullen, D. E. A survey of photon cross section data for use in EPICS2017. IAEA (Int. Atomic Energy Agency), Vienna, Austria, Tech. Rep. IAEA-NDS-225, rev, 1. (2018).
- 34.Nabil, I. M. et al. Influence of aluminum and vanadium oxides on copper Borate glass: A physical/radiological study. Nuclear Eng. Technol.56 (8), 3335–3346 (2024). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.



















