Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1991 Winter;24(4):775–781. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-775

An analysis of error-correction procedures during discrimination training.

T A Rodgers 1, B A Iwata 1
PMCID: PMC1279634  PMID: 1797779

Abstract

Mechanisms involved in error-correction procedures during behavioral acquisition were examined. Seven developmentally delayed subjects participated in match-to-sample discrimination training, consisting of three conditions arranged in a multielement design. Correct responses in all conditions were followed by praise and either food or pennies. In the baseline condition (differential reinforcement), an error produced no consequences. In the practice condition, an error was followed by repetition of the trial until a correct response occurred. In the avoidance condition, an error was followed by additional trials consisting of irrelevant stimuli; this condition separated the effects of repeated exposure to the same task from those of negative reinforcement, both of which existed in the practice condition. All 7 subjects made noticeable progress in the baseline condition. However, 5 of the 7 performed better in one of the error-correction conditions: 2 performed better in the practice condition, and 3 performed better in the avoidance condition. These data indicate that error-correction procedures may serve multiple functions and suggest that the practice requirement in this study included both avoidance and stimulus control components. More generally, the data indicate that additional control procedures should be included in acquisition studies to identify the relevant behavioral mechanism(s).

Full text

PDF
775

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman K., Hobbs S., Roberts M., Haavik S. Control of disruptive behavior by manipulation of reinforcement density and item difficulty subsequent to errors. Appl Res Ment Retard. 1980;1(3-4):193–208. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(80)90004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barton E. S. Inappropriate speech in a severely retarded child: a case study in language conditioning and generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Winter;3(4):299–307. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett C. W. Articulation training of two hearing-impaired girls. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Fall;7(3):439–445. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Iwata B. A. Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: an emerging technology. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Winter;20(4):361–378. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McGee G. G., Krantz P. J., McClannahan L. E. An extension of incidental teaching procedures to reading instruction for autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Summer;19(2):147–157. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McMorrow M. J., Foxx R. M. Some direct and generalized effects of replacing an autistic man's echolalia with correct responses to questions. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Fall;19(3):289–297. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McReynolds L. V. Application of timeout from positive reinforcement for increasing the efficiency of speech training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Fall;2(3):199–205. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nutter D., Reid D. H. Teaching retarded women a clothing selection skill using community norms. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Winter;11(4):475–487. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ollendick T. H., Matson J. L., Esveldt-Dawson K., Shapiro E. S. Increasing spelling achievement: an analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):645–654. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Osnes P. G., Stokes T. F. The functional role of preschoolers' verbalizations in the generalization of self-instructional training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):45–55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Panyan M. C., Hall R. V. Effects of serial versus concurrent task sequencing an acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Spring;11(1):67–74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schumaker J., Sherman J. A. Training generative verb usage by imitation and reinforcement procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Winter;3(4):273–287. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yamamoto J., Mochizuki A. Acquisition and functional analysis of manding with autistic students. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):57–64. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES