Table 1.
Overview of the formulas proposed over the time to calculate target height
| Authors, year | Studied Population | Formula | Adjustment(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanner et al., 1970 [8] | England | [(FH + MH) ± 13]/2; range ± 8.5 cm | - |
| Ogata et al., 1990* [29] | Japan |
[(FH + MH) ± 13]/2 + 2 range boys ± 9 cm, girls ± 8 cm |
Secular trend |
| Su et al., 2007 [31] | Taiwan |
TH (boys) = 79.3 + 0.56*MPH TH (girls) = 35.2 + 0.76*MPH |
Secular trend |
| Atluri et al., 2018 [32] | India |
TH (boys) = (FH + MH)/2 + 9 TH (girls) = (FH + MH)/2 – 4 |
Secular trend and sex correction factor |
| Cole 1996 [38] | England | MPH SDS = (MH SDS + FH SDS)/1.6 | Extreme parental heights |
| Cole 2000 [40] | England | MPH SDS = (MH SDS + FH SDS)/2 | Extreme parental heights |
| Wright et al., 1999 [41] | England | TH-SDS = MPH SDS * 0.51 + 0.015 | Extreme parental heights |
| Luo et al., 1998 [13] | Sweden |
TH (boys) = 45.99 + 0.78 * MPH TH (girls) = 37.85 + 0.75 * MPH range: ± 10 cm |
Not affected by assortative mating or the absence of it |
| Hermanussen & Cole, 2002[42] | Germany |
TH SDS = [(FH SDS + MH SDS)/2]*0.72 range: ± 1.6 SDS |
Assortative mating and parent–offspring correlation |
| Van Dommelen et al., 2012 [34] | Netherlands |
TH (boys) = 44.5 + 0.376 * FH (cm) + 0.411 * MH (cm) TH (girls) = 47.1 + 0.334 * FH (cm) + 0.364 * MH (cm) |
Assortative mating and parent–offspring correlation |
| Hughes & Davies, 2008 [44] | Australia |
TH (boys) = 176.9 + 2.57 * [(FH-176.9)/7.1 + (MH-163.3)/6.5] range: ± 11.7 cm TH (girls) = 163.3 + 2.33 *[(FH-176.9)/7.1 + (MH-163.3)/6.5] range = ± 10.6 cm |
Assortative mating and parent–offspring correlation |
FH father height, MH mother height, MPH mid-parental height, SDS standard deviation score, TH target height
*In 2007 the same authors re-updated the formula, aligning it with Tanner’s formula