Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jan 13;76(1):e70043. doi: 10.3322/caac.70043

Cancer statistics, 2026

Rebecca L Siegel 1,, Tyler B Kratzer 1, Nikita Sandeep Wagle 1, Hyuna Sung 1, Ahmedin Jemal 1
PMCID: PMC12798275  PMID: 41528114

ABSTRACT

Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population‐based cancer occurrence and outcomes using data collected by central cancer registries (incidence, through 2022) and the National Center for Health Statistics (mortality, through 2023). In 2026, approximately 2,114,850 new cancer cases and 626,140 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. The cancer mortality rate continued to decline through 2023, averting 4.8 million deaths since 1991, largely because of smoking reductions, earlier detection, and improved treatment. These interventions are also evident in rising 5‐year relative survival, which reached a milestone 70% for diagnoses during 2015–2021 overall, 69% for regional‐stage disease, and 35% for distant‐stage (metastatic) disease, up from 63%, 54%, and 17%, respectively, in the mid‐1990s. People with high‐mortality cancers and advanced diagnoses had the largest gains, including increases from 32% to 62% for myeloma, 7% to 22% for liver cancer, 16% to 35% for metastatic melanoma, 8% to 18% for metastatic rectal cancer, 20% to 37% for regional lung cancer, and 2% to 10% for metastatic lung cancer. Nevertheless, lung cancer will cause more deaths in 2026 than second‐ranking colorectal cancer and third‐ranking pancreatic cancer combined. In summary, decades of scientific investment have translated to longer lives for people with even the most fatal cancers. However, continued progress is threatened by proposed federal cuts to cancer research and health insurance, which provides access to life‐saving cancer treatment.

Keywords: cancer cases, cancer mortality, cancer statistics, incidence, survival

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is a global public health problem. In the United States, it is the second‐leading cause of death overall and the leading cause among people younger than 85 years. Although cancer mortality has declined in the United States for several decades, there are numerous threats to this progress, such as rising incidence for many common cancers; persistent socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities; and a potential uptick in advanced‐stage diagnoses in the wake of pandemic‐related delays in detection. For example, disruptions in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and care are projected to result in 4000–7000 excess deaths by 2040; 1 however, the rebound unique to CRC screening, driven by increased stool testing, may mitigate this impact. 2 Importantly, cancer screening uptake since the pandemic has been slower among communities of color, 3 which may exacerbate existing disparities in survival and mortality.

This article provides the estimated numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in 2026 in the United States nationally and for each state as well as a comprehensive overview of cancer occurrence based on up‐to‐date, population‐based data for cancer incidence and mortality through 2022 and 2023, respectively. We also estimate the total number of cancer deaths averted through 2023 because of the continuous decline in the cancer death rate since the early 1990s.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data sources

Population‐based cancer incidence data in the United States have been collected by the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program since 1973 and by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) since 1995. The SEER program is the only source for historic population‐based incidence data from the eight oldest SEER areas (Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, Utah, and the metropolitan areas of Atlanta, San Francisco‐Oakland, and Seattle‐Puget Sound), which represent approximately 8% of the US population. 4 Historical survival data (1975–1977 and 1995–1997) are based on the SEER 8 areas plus the Detroit metropolitan area, as published previously. 5 Contemporary survival statistics are based on data from the SEER 8 registries plus the Alaska Native Tumor Registry, California, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York, and Texas, 6 representing 42% of the US population, with vital status follow‐up through 2022. Twenty‐one SEER registries, which additionally include Illinois and cover 46% of the United States population, were the source for the probability of developing cancer.

The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) compiles and reports incidence data from 1995 onward for registries that participate in the SEER program and/or the NPCR. These data approach 100% coverage of the US population for the most recent years and were the source for the projected new cancer cases in 2026, contemporary incidence trends, cross‐sectional incidence rates, and stage distribution. 7 , 8 The incidence data presented herein differ slightly from those published online in the NAACCR's CiNA (Cancer in North America) Explorer (https://apps.naaccr.org/explorer/; accessed August 27, 2025) because rates are adjusted for delays in case reporting using state‐level delay factors. Incidence data for Puerto Rico were abstracted from the CiNA Explorer.

Mortality data from 1930 to 2023 were provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). 9 , 10 Forty‐seven states and the District of Columbia met data quality requirements for reporting to the national vital statistics system in 1930, and Texas, Alaska, and Hawaii began reporting in 1933, 1959, and 1960, respectively. The methods for abstraction and age‐adjustment of mortality data before 1969 are described elsewhere. 10 , 11 Contemporary 5‐year mortality rates for Puerto Rico were sourced from State Cancer Profiles (https://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov; accessed July 18, 2025), a collaboration between the CDC and the NCI.

All cancer cases were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, third edition, except childhood and adolescent cancers, which were classified according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancer. 12 , 13 , 14 CRC case data exclude appendiceal cancers except for estimated new diagnoses in 2026. Causes of death were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases. 15

Statistical analysis

Incidence and mortality

All incidence and mortality rates were age standardized to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups for incidence, 20 age groups for mortality) and expressed per 100,000 persons (or per million for childhood and adolescent cancer incidence), as calculated by the NCI's SEER*Stat software, version 9.0.41. Population data before 2010 were modified intercensal annual estimates by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin produced by the US Census Bureau and the NCHS in collaboration with the NCI (https://seer.cancer.gov/popdata/modifications.html; accessed October 13, 2025). Population estimates for 2010–2019 were produced by Woods & Poole Economics, Inc. (https://seer.cancer.gov/popdata/W&P_ICen_Tech_Documentation.pdf; accessed October 13, 2025) and, for 2020–2023, were based on Vintage 2023 estimates (https://seer.cancer.gov/popdata/; accessed August 15, 2025). Population estimates incorporate race‐bridging, which combines multiple‐race categories in the 2000 and 2010 census into individual race categories. These population estimates differ from those used in the calculation of rates provided in CDC Wonder (https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/ucd‐expanded.html#Population%202022; accessed August 15, 2025), resulting in differences for some years. Official US Census Bureau intercensal population estimates are anticipated to be available for future data releases. (For more information on population estimates issued by the US Census Bureau, see https://census.gov/programs‐surveys/popest.html; accessed August 15, 2025).

The probability of developing cancer was calculated using NCI's DevCan software, version 6.9.2, and the annual percent change (APC) in rates was quantified using NCI's Joinpoint Regression Program, version 5.4.0.0. Trends were described as increasing or decreasing when the APC was statistically significant based on a two‐sided p value < .05, calculated using the parametric method; otherwise, they were described as stable. Trend and lifetime risk analyses exclude cancer incidence in 2020 because the Joinpoint and DevCan modeling programs were not designed to accommodate such a large single‐year data anomaly as occurred because of pandemic‐related disruptions in health care. 16

All statistics presented by race exclude Hispanic ethnicity to minimize racial misclassification. Racial misclassification for the American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) population was further mitigated by restricting incidence rates to Purchased/Referred Care Delivery Area counties and adjusting nationally representative mortality rates using classification ratios previously published by the NCHS. 17

Whenever possible, cancer incidence rates were adjusted for delays in reporting, which occur because of lags in case capture and data corrections. Delay adjustment has the largest effect on most recent data years and for cancers that are frequently diagnosed in outpatient settings (e.g., melanoma, leukemia, and prostate cancer). For example, the leukemia incidence rate for 2022 was 13% higher after adjusting for reporting delays (15.4 vs. 13.6 per 100,000 persons). Delay adjustment is particularly important when quantifying contemporary trends. 18 In addition, rates for uterine corpus and uterine cervix cancers were corrected for hysterectomy prevalence by removing these women from the population at risk (denominator) based on Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data during 2018–2022 by state, age (20–39 years or 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80 years and older), and race and ethnicity. 19 The case count for each cancer was then added back to the at‐risk populations because hysterectomy is a common treatment for both cancers. Corrected rates were age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using the same method described above.

Survival

Relative survival is a measure of survival in the absence of competing causes of death. It is calculated as the ratio of the observed survival among a group of patients with cancer to their expected survival in the general population. Expected survival is calculated using life tables that match each patient with cancer to their respective sex, age, race, geographic area, socioeconomic status, and year of diagnosis, which are updated annually using population and mortality data. 20 Thus, relative survival is a measure of net cancer survival, and is useful for tracking progress in cancer early detection and treatment. In addition, relative survival measures excess mortality and thus does not require detailed cause‐of‐death information, which is often unavailable or unreliable, 21 despite active follow‐up of patients from diagnosis to death or loss to follow‐up by SEER registry personnel. For the current analysis, we used the Ederer II method for calculating expected survival 22 and the actuarial method to calculate survival, with life tables that included detailed information by Hispanic ethnicity. 20 Relative survival was calculated by cancer site and race (all races, White, and Black) for three diagnosis periods (1975–1977, 1995–1997, and 2015–2021) and by stage at diagnosis (all stages, localized, regional, and distant).

Projected cancer cases and deaths in 2026

The most recent year for which incidence and mortality data are available lags 2–3 years behind the current year because of the time required for data collection, compilation, quality control, and dissemination. Therefore, we project the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States in 2026 to estimate the contemporary cancer burden using two‐step statistical modeling, as described in detail elsewhere. 23 , 24 Briefly, complete cancer diagnoses were estimated for every state from 2008 through 2022 based on high‐quality, delay‐adjusted incidence data from 50 states and the District of Columbia (99.7% population coverage) as well as state‐level variations in sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, medical settings, and cancer screening behaviors. 25 Counts were adjusted for the deficit in cases during March through May 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic based on the proportion of cases diagnosed in those months in previous years. Modeled state and national counts were then projected 4 years ahead using a novel, data‐driven Joinpoint algorithm. 24 Basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers cannot be estimated because these diagnoses are not recorded by most cancer registries. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the female breast and in situ melanoma of the skin were estimated by approximating annual case counts from 2013 through 2022 based on NAACCR age‐specific incidence rates, delay factors for invasive disease (delay factors are unavailable for in situ cases), and US population estimates. Counts were then projected 4 years ahead based on the average APC generated by the Joinpoint regression model. The number of cancer deaths expected to occur in 2026 was estimated by applying the data‐driven Joinpoint algorithm described above to reported cancer deaths from 2009 through 2023 at the state and national levels. 24

Other statistics

The number of cancer deaths averted in men and women because of the reduction in cancer death rates since the early 1990s was estimated by summing the annual difference between the number of cancer deaths recorded and the number that would have been expected if cancer death rates had remained at their peak. The expected number of deaths was estimated by applying the 5‐year, age‐specific and sex‐specific cancer death rate in the peak year for age‐standardized cancer death rates (1990 in men, 1991 in women) to the corresponding age‐specific and sex‐specific population estimates in subsequent years through 2023.

SELECTED FINDINGS

Expected number of new cancer cases and deaths

Table 1 presents the estimated numbers of new invasive cancer cases in the United States in 2026 by sex and cancer type. In total, there will be approximately 2,114,850 new cancer diagnoses, the equivalent of about 5800 cases each day. In addition, there will be about 122,680 new cases of melanoma in situ of the skin and 60,730 new cases of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in women in 2026. The estimated numbers of new cases for selected cancers by state are shown in Table 2. The lifetime probability of being diagnosed with invasive cancer is one in three for both men (39.2%) and women (38.7%; Table 3). Although most (60%) cancer diagnoses are still in people aged 65 years or older, an increasing portion are in younger adults, including 28% in people aged 50–64 years and 12% in people younger than 50. However, age distribution varies widely by cancer type; for example, the proportion of diagnoses before age 50 years ranges from 1% of prostate cancers and 2% of lung cancers to 17% of breast cancers and 47% of cervical cancers. 7

TABLE 1.

Estimated number of new cancer cases and deaths by sex, United States, 2026.

Estimated New Cases Estimated Deaths
Both sexes Male Female Both sexes Male Female
All sites 2,114,850 1,094,070 1,020,780 626,140 327,290 298,850
Oral cavity & pharynx 60,480 43,070 17,410 13,150 9420 3730
Tongue 20,420 14,250 6170 3560 2460 1100
Mouth 15,810 9230 6580 3340 2030 1310
Pharynx 21,760 17,880 3880 4760 3780 980
Other oral cavity 2490 1710 780 1490 1150 340
Digestive system 369,970 203,500 166,470 178,700 102,000 76,700
Esophagus 22,530 17,580 4950 16,290 12,940 3350
Stomach 31,510 17,900 13,610 10,740 6360 4380
Small intestine 14,450 7470 6980 2170 1250 920
Colon & rectum a 158,850 84,160 74,690 55,230 30,110 25,120
Colon 108,860 55,410 53,450
Rectum 49,990 28,750 21,240
Anus, anal canal, & anorectum 11,270 3570 7700 1700 570 1130
Liver & intrahepatic bile duct 42,340 27,790 14,550 30,980 19,650 11,330
Gallbladder & other biliary 12,640 5950 6690 4590 1960 2630
Pancreas 67,530 35,190 32,340 52,740 27,230 25,510
Other digestive organs 8850 3890 4960 4260 1930 2330
Respiratory system 247,820 124,540 123,280 130,550 67,260 63,290
Larynx 12,290 9730 2560 3960 3180 780
Lung & bronchus 229,410 110,910 118,500 124,990 63,040 61,950
Other respiratory organs 6120 3900 2220 1600 1040 560
Bones & joints 4110 2290 1820 2210 1240 970
Soft tissue (including heart) 13,910 7840 6070 5400 2960 2440
Skin (excluding basal & squamous) 119,750 70,590 49,160 14,570 9850 4720
Melanoma of the skin 112,000 65,400 46,600 8510 5500 3010
Other nonepithelial skin 7750 5190 2560 6060 4350 1710
Breast 324,580 2670 321,910 42,670 530 42,140
Genital system 463,560 345,900 117,660 71,970 37,400 34,570
Uterine cervix 13,490 13,490 4200 4200
Uterine corpus 68,270 68,270 14,450 14,450
Ovary 21,010 21,010 12,450 12,450
Vulva 7130 7130 1750 1750
Vagina & other genital, female 7760 7760 1720 1720
Prostate 333,830 333,830 36,320 36,320
Testis 9810 9810 630 630
Penis & other genital, male 2260 2260 450 450
Urinary system 169,700 118,460 51,240 34,400 23,760 10,640
Urinary bladder 84,530 64,730 19,800 17,870 12,640 5230
Kidney & renal pelvis 80,450 50,770 29,680 15,160 10,200 4960
Ureter & other urinary organs 4720 2960 1760 1370 920 450
Eye & orbit 3200 1720 1480 530 280 250
Brain & other nervous system 24,740 13,830 10,910 18,350 9970 8380
Endocrine system 53,200 16,630 36,570 3500 1700 1800
Thyroid 45,240 13,240 32,000 2320 1100 1220
Other endocrine 7960 3390 4570 1180 600 580
Lymphoma 88,240 48,660 39,580 21,070 12,390 8680
Hodgkin lymphoma 8920 4890 4030 1100 680 420
Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma 79,320 43,770 35,550 19,970 11,710 8260
Myeloma 36,000 20,150 15,850 10,850 5780 5070
Leukemia 67,790 39,070 28,720 23,910 13,900 10,010
Acute lymphocytic leukemia 6250 3600 2650 1600 930 670
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia 22,760 13,810 8950 4350 2720 1630
Acute myeloid leukemia 22,720 12,160 10,560 11,500 6520 4980
Chronic myeloid leukemia 9650 5810 3840 1170 630 540
Other leukemia 6410 3690 2720 5290 3100 2190
Other & unspecified primary sites 67,800 35,150 32,650 54,310 28,850 25,460

Note: Estimates are rounded to the nearest 10 and cases exclude basal cell and squamous cell skin cancer and in situ carcinoma except urinary bladder. About 60,730 cases of female breast ductal carcinoma in situ and 122,680 cases of melanoma in situ will be diagnosed in 2026. These are model‐based estimates that should be interpreted with caution.

a

Deaths for colon and rectal cancers are combined because a large number of deaths from rectal cancer are misclassified as colon.

TABLE 2.

Estimated number of new cases for selected cancers by state, United States, 2026. a

State All sites Female breast Colon & rectum Leukemia Lung & bronchus Melanoma of the skin Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma Prostate Urinary bladder Uterine cervix Uterine corpus
Alabama 30,710 4,900 2690 870 3960 1450 960 5400 1210 250 910
Alaska 4040 580 340 110 440 140 140 750 170 a 110
Arizona 44,620 7090 3330 1450 4350 3890 1690 5540 1970 280 1430
Arkansas 20,420 2720 1620 600 2710 1050 670 3150 780 150 520
California 206,500 34,170 16,650 6380 16,670 12,170 8310 32,610 7370 1490 7390
Colorado 30,160 5210 2210 1030 2620 2190 1190 4480 1220 190 890
Connecticut 24,020 3940 1690 830 2670 770 980 4000 1190 120 850
Delaware 8410 1240 520 200 950 450 290 1410 350 a 260
District of Columbia 3190 590 230 80 330 90 100 450 100 a 110
Florida 183,100 24,700 12,850 7060 18,570 10,530 7600 26,970 7630 1200 5490
Georgia 68,440 10,440 5350 1960 6780 3700 2190 11,420 2310 470 2050
Hawaii 9420 1700 840 240 870 550 340 1310 310 60 390
Idaho 12,470 1890 900 490 1090 1080 490 2030 580 70 310
Illinois 78,880 12,340 6160 2360 9430 4390 2890 13,050 3180 490 2740
Indiana 44,950 6530 3510 1410 6230 2330 1630 6440 1890 290 1420
Iowa 22,710 3030 1630 810 2500 1780 860 3320 960 120 700
Kansas 16,680 2620 1410 520 2090 860 670 2650 620 100 540
Kentucky 31,440 4280 2660 990 5060 1610 1150 4290 1310 210 940
Louisiana 29,870 4250 2500 870 3390 1310 1020 5440 1030 200 710
Maine 10,680 1600 730 380 1460 410 440 1820 640 a 390
Maryland 38,160 6290 2740 1060 3920 2030 1350 7230 1400 220 1350
Massachusetts 43,250 7340 2910 1410 5390 1370 1760 7310 1990 180 1520
Michigan 68,730 9900 4830 2110 8460 3330 2490 10,530 3030 370 2170
Minnesota 39,830 5670 2630 1330 3970 3450 1560 6340 1600 160 1210
Mississippi 18,080 2670 1690 550 2660 660 620 3170 650 140 480
Missouri 42,350 6300 3200 1350 5780 2310 1530 5530 1590 250 1230
Montana 8130 1150 550 250 760 620 280 1260 370 a 200
Nebraska 12,680 1770 950 380 1320 840 450 2030 480 60 390
Nevada 18,110 2880 1530 560 1770 1120 630 2970 790 160 520
New Hampshire 10,150 1560 670 350 1330 470 450 1760 540 a 350
New Jersey 60,740 9510 4540 2090 5640 2570 2500 11,480 2650 360 2260
New Mexico 11,840 1910 940 400 920 750 430 2140 450 100 420
New York 125,860 19,010 9140 4120 13,150 4530 5060 22,180 5410 770 4270
North Carolina 74,400 11,820 5050 2260 8880 4180 2500 11,190 2770 420 2220
North Dakota 4650 660 360 160 480 380 170 810 180 a 120
Ohio 78,080 11,400 5830 2170 10,120 4600 2810 11,670 3390 490 2590
Oklahoma 24,570 3550 2010 730 3100 1210 840 3390 920 180 700
Oregon 27,970 4290 1890 840 2970 1660 1120 3630 1270 140 890
Pennsylvania 90,250 13,720 6520 2910 10,710 3890 3410 13,470 4160 510 3300
Rhode Island 7260 1160 490 250 910 270 300 1310 380 a 260
South Carolina 36,920 6030 2820 1010 4550 2010 1200 6900 1410 240 1110
South Dakota 6200 860 460 200 690 450 200 910 250 a 170
Tennessee 44,660 6920 3560 1330 6380 1850 1520 7190 1780 310 1340
Texas 161,330 24,270 13,310 5660 14,260 5910 5850 24,090 5050 1470 5260
Utah 15,170 2380 1030 600 790 1900 600 2650 530 100 530
Vermont 4680 710 310 160 590 250 200 850 230 a 170
Virginia 52,160 8470 3770 1320 6060 2560 1790 9120 1910 290 1710
Washington 48,590 7710 3300 1550 5020 2860 1900 6980 1980 280 1400
West Virginia 13,590 1680 1060 400 2110 590 450 1640 580 80 500
Wisconsin 42,140 6030 2680 1550 4220 2340 1620 7050 1790 180 1390
Wyoming 3640 500 270 100 330 270 120 500 170 a 110
United States 2,114,850 321,910 158,850 67,790 229,410 112,000 79,320 333,830 84,530 13,490 68,270

Note: Estimates are rounded to the nearest 10 and exclude basal and squamous cell skin cancers and in situ carcinomas except urinary bladder. State estimates may not sum to US total because of rounding and exclusion of state estimates of fewer than 50 cases. These are model‐based estimates that should be interpreted with caution.

a

Fewer than 50 cases.

TABLE 3.

Probability (%) of developing invasive cancer during selected age intervals by sex, United States, 2019–2022. a

Site Sex Birth to 49 years 50–64 years 65–84 years 85 years and older Birth to death
All sites b Male 3.4 (1 in 29) 11.3 (1 in 9) 31.4 (1 in 3) 18.6 (1 in 5) 39.2 (1 in 3)
Female 6.0 (1 in 17) 10.8 (1 in 9) 24.3 (1 in 4) 14.1 (1 in 7) 38.7 (1 in 3)
Breast Female 2.2 (1 in 46) 4.0 (1 in 25) 7.3 (1 in 14) 2.6 (1 in 38) 13.0 (1 in 8)
Colon & rectum Male 0.4 (1 in 223) 1.2 (1 in 83) 2.5 (1 in 40) 1.6 (1 in 62) 4.0 (1 in 25)
Female 0.4 (1 in 237) 0.9 (1 in 115) 2.1 (1 in 48) 1.6 (1 in 63) 3.8 (1 in 26)
Kidney & renal pelvis Male 0.3 (1 in 383) 0.7 (1 in 145) 1.5 (1 in 68) 0.6 (1 in 180) 2.2 (1 in 45)
Female 0.2 (1 in 595) 0.3 (1 in 287) 0.8 (1 in 128) 0.3 (1 in 310) 1.3 (1 in 75)
Leukemia Male 0.3 (1 in 376) 0.3 (1 in 300) 1.2 (1 in 84) 0.8 (1 in 120) 1.8 (1 in 56)
Female 0.2 (1 in 479) 0.2 (1 in 448) 0.7 (1 in 136) 0.5 (1 in 195) 1.3 (1 in 77)
Lung & bronchus Male 0.1 (1 in 922) 1.0 (1 in 96) 4.5 (1 in 22) 2.4 (1 in 42) 5.4 (1 in 19)
Female 0.1 (1 in 831) 1.0 (1 in 97) 4.0 (1 in 25) 1.8 (1 in 56) 5.4 (1 in 19)
Melanoma of the skin c Male 0.4 (1 in 248) 0.9 (1 in 116) 2.4 (1 in 41) 1.5 (1 in 68) 3.5 (1 in 28)
Female 0.6 (1 in 158) 0.7 (1 in 145) 1.2 (1 in 83) 0.6 (1 in 171) 2.6 (1 in 39)
Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma Male 0.2 (1 in 402) 0.5 (1 in 209) 1.5 (1 in 66) 0.9 (1 in 109) 2.2 (1 in 46)
Female 0.2 (1 in 538) 0.4 (1 in 271) 1.1 (1 in 87) 0.6 (1 in 159) 1.8 (1 in 55)
Prostate Male 0.2 (1 in 480) 3.8 (1 in 26) 11.0 (1 in 9) 3.3 (1 in 30) 12.9 (1 in 8)
Thyroid Male 0.2 (1 in 503) 0.2 (1 in 510) 0.3 (1 in 360) 0.1 (1 in 1460) 0.6 (1 in 162)
Female 0.8 (1 in 128) 0.5 (1 in 210) 0.4 (1 in 226) 0.1 (1 in 1104) 1.7 (1 in 60)
Uterine cervix d Female 0.3 (1 in 343) 0.2 (1 in 553) 0.2 (1 in 592) 0.1 (1 in 1593) 0.6 (1 in 156)
Uterine corpus d Female 0.3 (1 in 289) 1.1 (1 in 90) 1.8 (1 in 57) 0.4 (1 in 246) 3.1 (1 in 32)

Note: Probabilities are for those who are free of cancer at the beginning of each age interval.

a

Excludes 2020.

b

Excludes basal and squamous cell skin cancers and in situ cancers except urinary bladder.

c

Probabilities are for non‐Hispanic White individuals only.

d

Not adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence.

Figure 1 depicts the most common cancers diagnosed in men and women in 2026. Prostate cancer, lung and bronchus (hereinafter lung) cancer, and CRC account for almost one half (48%) of all incident cases in men, with prostate cancer alone accounting for nearly one third of diagnoses. In women, breast cancer, lung cancer, and CRC account for 50% of all new diagnoses, with breast cancer alone accounting for nearly one third of cases.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Leading cancer types of estimated new cancer cases and deaths by sex, United States, 2026. Estimates are rounded to the nearest 10 and cases exclude basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers and in situ carcinoma except urinary bladder. Percentages may not sum to totals because of rounding. Rank is based on modeled projections and may differ from the most recent observed data.

An estimated 626,140 people in the United States will die from cancer in 2026, corresponding to about 1720 deaths per day (Table 1). Table 4 provides the estimated number of deaths by state for cancer overall and for the 10 cancer types that cause the most deaths. Lung cancer is the leading cancer death, killing more people than second‐ranking CRC and third‐ranking pancreatic cancer combined. Approximately 87% of lung cancers in men and 84% in women are attributable to cigarette smoking. 26 Smoking prevalence dropped from 42% in 1964 to 11% in 2023, 27 but it continues to be the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, accounting for approximately 182,830 cancer deaths in 2026 directly or through secondhand smoke exposure. 26

TABLE 4.

Estimated number of deaths for selected cancers by state, United States, 2026.

State All sites Brain & other nervous system Female breast Colon & rectum Leukemia Liver & intrahepatic bile duct Lung & bronchus Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma Pancreas Prostate Urinary bladder
Alabama 10,670 320 730 970 360 550 2370 280 760 560 310
Alaska 1140 a 60 90 a a 210 a 80 70 a
Arizona 13,800 350 1000 1330 570 730 2330 450 1170 900 340
Arkansas 6840 190 390 670 220 360 1640 190 470 360 220
California 61,280 1970 4580 5660 2320 3690 9580 2180 5250 4210 1660
Colorado 8740 310 710 790 390 450 1340 290 750 670 260
Connecticut 6760 230 420 490 270 340 1240 220 600 430 220
Delaware 2430 70 190 190 90 110 510 80 230 150 90
District of Columbia 820 a 80 80 30 40 150 a 70 70 a
Florida 50,010 1470 3360 4240 2000 2200 9990 1560 4280 2970 1630
Georgia 19,400 590 1430 1750 700 990 3500 540 1410 1160 530
Hawaii 2720 50 200 260 90 160 470 100 250 170 60
Idaho 3510 130 250 310 150 190 580 90 300 240 90
Illinois 23,230 680 1350 2080 880 1090 4880 730 2080 1280 620
Indiana 14,230 390 900 1260 520 560 3430 450 1090 740 400
Iowa 6330 180 370 530 270 290 1350 230 510 330 180
Kansas 5700 190 370 510 250 250 1250 220 450 290 150
Kentucky 10,510 270 640 970 370 500 2870 310 760 450 310
Louisiana 9360 250 560 870 330 580 2080 260 750 450 220
Maine 3560 100 200 260 120 130 800 120 280 220 130
Maryland 11,280 300 810 980 420 530 2120 370 960 710 320
Massachusetts 12,470 410 710 840 460 650 2510 410 1200 710 330
Michigan 21,580 630 1320 1630 810 830 4850 630 1900 1120 620
Minnesota 10,660 330 640 800 450 500 2060 390 930 600 270
Mississippi 6740 190 470 670 250 330 1580 180 510 390 170
Missouri 13,470 380 970 1280 490 650 3320 420 1,060 720 380
Montana 2310 90 140 200 80 120 420 70 190 160 70
Nebraska 3680 130 260 340 160 170 810 120 320 200 140
Nevada 5840 150 430 580 170 320 1050 170 490 400 200
New Hampshire 3050 110 180 190 90 140 630 100 270 180 110
New Jersey 15,150 400 1160 1330 570 690 2890 470 1430 770 470
New Mexico 3970 120 280 360 170 170 590 120 290 270 110
New York 31,140 850 1920 2680 1190 1310 5850 980 2930 1,650 810
North Carolina 21,770 570 1460 1900 780 920 5040 630 1840 1,230 590
North Dakota 1320 a 70 110 60 50 270 a 120 70 a
Ohio 24,590 640 1580 2020 950 1050 5550 790 2130 1350 750
Oklahoma 8490 250 580 820 320 360 1920 270 590 450 270
Oregon 8840 270 580 670 350 450 1610 310 710 590 300
Pennsylvania 27,630 820 1770 2240 1060 1260 5870 900 2420 1440 850
Rhode Island 2120 70 120 150 70 140 410 70 200 110 70
South Carolina 11,700 360 800 970 420 590 2400 360 960 660 430
South Dakota 1810 a 90 150 80 50 380 60 160 100 a
Tennessee 15,270 400 1040 1610 530 720 3690 450 1160 750 350
Texas 46,300 1360 3400 4750 1820 3170 8080 1470 3770 2480 1,220
Utah 3970 170 340 440 190 200 470 140 350 310 100
Vermont 1520 50 90 130 50 50 300 50 130 100 a
Virginia 16,550 500 1150 1490 650 780 3300 500 1320 1020 440
Washington 14,160 390 960 1160 540 730 2570 510 1220 980 400
West Virginia 4710 120 290 420 180 190 1330 150 330 240 130
Wisconsin 11,840 360 670 880 560 550 2310 410 1200 790 320
Wyoming 1160 a 80 130 a 50 210 a 110 70 a
United States 626,140 18,350 42,140 55,230 23,910 30,980 124,990 19,970 52,740 36,320 14,450

Note: Estimates are rounded to the nearest 10. State estimates may not sum to US total because of rounding and exclusion of state estimates of fewer than 50 deaths. These are model‐based estimates that should be interpreted with caution.

a

Fewer than 50 deaths.

Trends in cancer incidence

Figure 2 illustrates long‐term temporal trends in overall cancer incidence by sex from 1975 through 2022. Observed incidence rates in 2020 are presented as data points separate from the trend line because pandemic‐related disruptions in diagnosis resulted in 9%–10% lower rates than expected, mostly for asymptomatic disease. 16 , 28 Incidence rates since 2020 have been a continuation of prepandemic trends except for a small rebound in breast cancer cases in 2021. 29 , 30

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Trends in cancer incidence (1975–2022) and mortality (1975–2023) rates by sex, United States. Rates are age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population, and incidence rates are adjusted for delays in case reporting. Incidence data for 2020 are shown separate from trend lines.

Cancer incidence in men spiked during the early 1990s because of a surge in the detection of asymptomatic prostate cancer through rapid, widespread prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing. 31 Thereafter, the male rate generally fell until 2014 and remained stable through 2022 at approximately 500 per 100,000 men (Figure 2). In contrast, cancer incidence in women gradually increased from 1978 through 2022 (445 per 100,000 women), narrowing the male‐to‐female incidence rate ratio from a peak of 1.6 in 1992 to 1.1 in 2022 (the rate ratio was 1.4 before the prostate/PSA peak). Higher risk in men for most cancer types reflects greater exposure to carcinogenic environmental and lifestyle factors, such as smoking, as well as other factors, including height, 32 , 33 endogenous hormone exposure, and immune function and response. 34 , 35

Figure 3 shows incidence trends for some common cancers by sex. In men, prostate cancer incidence is more than twice that of second‐ranking lung cancer. The prostate cancer incidence rate dropped by almost 40% from 2007 to 2014 because of an 8.4% per year decline in the diagnosis of localized (typically asymptomatic) disease in parallel with recommendations against screening by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) for men aged 75 years and older in 2008 and for all men in 2012. 36 , 37 From 2014 through 2022, the prostate cancer incidence rate rose by 2.9% per year (Table 5), with a longer and steeper slope for regional‐stage (4.6% per year since 2013) and distant‐stage (5.6% per year since 2011) disease. 38 Advanced‐stage diagnoses are increasing in men of all ages, and it is possible that expanded use of high‐sensitivity prostate magnetic resonance imaging is itself contributing to the trend, although at least one study found no evidence of an association. 39 In 2018, the USPSTF upgraded their recommendation for prostate cancer screening to informed decision‐making in asymptomatic men aged 55–69 years, 40 consistent with long‐standing American Cancer Society recommendations. 41 Despite concerning incidence trends, PSA screening remains an area of active debate given the high prevalence and severity of treatment complications. A recent 12‐year follow‐up study of men treated for prostate cancer found that, compared with same‐aged men in the general population, prostatectomy was associated with a seven‐fold higher risk of urinary or sexual complications, and radiotherapy was associated with a three‐fold higher risk of bladder cancer. 42 Forty years of follow‐up from the Swedish Malmo study recently reported that men with a PSA <2 ng/mL at age 60 years continued to be at low risk for lethal prostate cancer, 43 highlighting an opportunity for more investigation of a one‐and‐done approach.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Trends in incidence rates for selected cancers by sex, United States, 1975–2022. Rates are age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population and adjusted for delays in reporting. Data for 2020 are shown separate from trend lines. aExcludes appendix. bIncludes intrahepatic bile duct. cNot adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence.

TABLE 5.

Trends in incidence rates for selected cancers by sex, United States, 1998–2022.

Trend 1 Trend 2 Trend 3 Trend 4 Trend 5 AAPC
Years APC Years APC Years APC Years APC Years APC 2018–2022 2013–2022
All sites 1998–2001 1.0 a 2001–2004 −1.0 2004–2008 0.4 2008–2012 −1.4 a 2012–2022 0.2 a 0.2 a 0.2 a
Male 1998–2001 1.3 2001–2004 −1.5 2004–2007 0.6 2007–2013 −2.1 a 2013–2022 −0.0 −0.0 −0.0
Female 1998–2011 0.1 2011–2022 0.4 a 0.4 a 0.4 a
Female breast 1998–2001 −0.6 2001–2004 −3.0 2004–2016 0.5 a 2016–2022 1.2 a 1.2 a 1.0 a
Colon & rectum b 1998–2001 −1.3 a 2001–2008 −2.7 a 2008–2011 −4.1 a 2011–2017 −1.3 a 2017–2022 −0.6 a −0.6 a −0.9 a
Male 1998–2003 −2.0 a 2003–2012 −3.5 a 2012–2022 −1.0 a −1.0 a −1.0 a
Female 1998–2001 −1.3 a 2001–2007 −2.4 a 2007–2011 −3.8 a 2011–2018 −1.3 a 2018–2022 −0.4 −0.4 −0.9 a
Kidney & renal pelvis 1998–2007 3.5 a 2007–2011 −0.2 2011–2019 1.6 a 2019–2022 −0.5 0.0 0.9 a
Male 1998–2007 3.3 a 2007–2011 −0.2 2011–2019 1.6 a 2019–2022 −0.6 −0.0 0.9 a
Female 1998–2005 3.8 a 2005–2008 2.4 2008–2011 −1.0 2011–2019 1.6 a 2019–2022 −0.5 0.0 0.9 a
Liver & intrahepatic bile duct 1998–2002 2.3 a 2002–2009 4.6 a 2009–2015 3.2 a 2015–2019 0.8 2019–2022 −0.8 −0.4 0.8 a
Male 1998–2002 3.0 a 2002–2009 4.6 a 2009–2015 2.8 a 2015–2019 0.4 2019–2022 −1.7 −1.2 0.2
Female 1998–2003 0.9 2003–2015 4.0 a 2015–2022 1.8 a 1.8 a 2.3 a
Lung & bronchus 1998–2006 −0.4 a 2006–2019 −1.6 a 2019–2022 −3.3 a −2.9 a −2.2 a
Male 1998–2006 −1.3 a 2006–2019 −2.4 a 2019–2022 −4.2 a −3.7 a −3.0 a
Female 1998–2007 0.6 a 2007–2011 −1.5 a 2011–2019 −0.6 a 2019–2022 −2.7 a −2.2 a −1.3 a
Melanoma of skin 1998–2005 3.6 a 2005–2022 1.6 a 1.6 a 1.6 a
Male 1998–2001 5.7 a 2001–2016 2.1 a 2016–2022 0.6 0.6 1.1 a
Female 1998–2001 7.0 a 2001–2022 1.8 a 1.8 a 1.8 a
Ovary 1998–2019 −1.6 a 2019–2022 −0.1 −0.5 −1.1
Oral cavity & pharynx 1998–2004 −0.4 2004–2016 1.1 a 2016–2022 0.5 a 0.5 a 0.7 a
Male 1998–2005 −0.2 2005–2016 1.1 a 2016–2022 0.3 0.3 0.6 a
Female 1998–2003 −1.2 a 2003–2022 0.7 a 0.7 a 0.7 a
Tongue, tonsil, oropharynx 1998–2019 2.5 a 2019–2022 0.8 1.2 1.9 a
Other oral cavity 1998–2004 −2.6 a 2004–2015 −0.5 a 2015–2022 −1.0 a −1.0 a −0.9 a
Pancreas 1998–2022 1.1 a 1.1 a 1.1 a
Male 1998–2002 0.4 2002–2019 1.2 a 2019–2022 0.4 0.6 0.9 a
Female 1998–2022 1.2 a 1.2 a 1.2 a
Prostate 1998–2001 3.2 2001–2004 −5.4 2004–2007 3.1 2007–2014 −6.3 a 2014–2022 2.9 a 2.9 a 1.9 a
Thyroid 1998–2009 7.2 a 2009–2013 2.2 a 2013–2022 −1.4 a −1.4 a −1.4 a
Male 1998–2009 6.6 a 2009–2013 2.5 2013–2022 −0.5 a −0.5 a −0.5 a
Female 1998–2009 7.4 a 2009–2013 2.2 a 2013–2022 −1.7 a −1.7 a −1.7 a
Uterine cervix c 1998–2003 −3.7 a 2003–2013 −1.1 a 2013–2016 1.7 2016–2022 −0.7 a −0.7 a 0.1
Uterine corpus c 1998–2004 −0.5 2004–2019 1.4 a 2019–2022 −0.3 0.2 0.8 a

Note: Trends were analyzed using the Joinpoint Regression Program, version 5.4.0.0 allowing up to four joinpoints.

Abbreviations: AAPC, average annual percent change; APC, annual percent change (based on incidence rates age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population and adjusted for delays in reporting).

a

The APC or AAPC is significantly different from zero (p < .05).

b

Excludes appendix.

c

Not adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence.

Breast cancer similarly dominates cancer occurrence in women, with a rate well over twice that of second‐ranking lung cancer. Breast cancer incidence rates have increased slowly since the mid‐2000s (Figure 3, Table 5), largely driven by diagnoses of localized‐stage and hormone receptor‐positive disease. 44 In the past decade (2013–2022), the rate increased by 1% per year overall, with a steeper slope in women younger than 50 years (1.4% vs. 0.7% per year in those 50 years and older) and those who are Hispanic (1.8% per year) or Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander (AANHPI, 2.7% per year). The rise in incidence is largely attributed to the decreasing fertility rate and increasing obesity prevalence, 45 although excess body weight is associated with decreased breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. 46 According to the US Census Bureau, the percentage of women aged 15–44 years who did not experience pregnancy hit an all‐time high of 54% in 2024, up from 42% in 1998. 47 Physical inactivity and alcohol consumption account for 7% and 16% of breast cancer cases in the US, respectively, 26 and also may contribute. Even one alcoholic drink per day increases breast cancer risk, 48 and binge and heavy drinking (eight or more drinks per week) has increased in women aged 30–49 years, 49 especially among those with higher education and income 50 and without children. 51 There is some evidence that air pollution may be associated with increased risk, 52 although this exposure is very difficult to study. Many of these factors (including obesity and reproductive factors) are also associated with uterine corpus cancer risk and likely contribute to its rise in incidence since the mid‐2000s. However, these associations seem less pronounced for nonendometrioid subtypes, which are responsible for the increasing trend. 53 Uterine corpus cancer rates appear to have stabilized in recent years in White women but continue to increase in women of all other racial and ethnic groups by 2% or more per year.

Lung cancer is the third most common cancer diagnosis in men and women combined. Declines in lung cancer incidence continue to be faster in men (3% per year from 2013 to 2022) than in women (1.3% per year; Table 5) because women took up cigarette smoking in large numbers later and were also slower to quit, including upticks in smoking prevalence in some recent generations. 54 , 55 Trends are also less favorable for AANHPI women, among whom lung cancer incidence is increasing by 0.2% per year, and Native American people, among whom rates decreased by only 0.7% per year in men and have yet to decline in women. 56 Native American people have the highest smoking prevalence (15.2% vs. 12.5% in White people in 2023) 27 and the slowest decline, including the only increase in the number of people smoking. 57 Smoking status is not generally captured by population‐based cancer registries but is being newly collected by Commission on Cancer‐accredited hospital‐based registries that submit data to the National Cancer Database, which represents approximately 70% of cancer diagnoses in the United States. A recent analysis indicated that nearly one half of the people diagnosed with any cancer in 2023 were either former (33%) or current (15%) smokers, 58 compared with 11% current smoking prevalence in the general population. 27

CRC ranks third in men and women separately but fourth in the sexes combined (Table 1). Incidence continued to decline over the past decade by about 1% per year in men and women overall (Figure 3, Table 5) despite an increase in incidence among people younger than 50 years (by 2.9% per year) and aged 50–64 years (by 0.4% per year). The pace of increase in people younger than 50 years accelerated from 1.3% per year from the mid‐1990s to 2019 to 6.4% per year thereafter because of screening initiation in individuals aged 45–49 years and the diagnosis of prevalent asymptomatic cancers. 59 , 60 Melanoma is one of the most preventable common cancers, with greater than 90% of cases in the United States attributable to ultraviolet radiation exposure. 26 Stable melanoma incidence in men in recent years (Table 5) is the conflation of decreasing rates in those younger than 50 years (by 1% per year since the early 2000s) and increasing rates in men aged 50 years and older, although it slowed from 2.6% per year during 2005–2016 to 0.8% per year from 2016 to 2022. Similarly, a nearly 2% per year increase in melanoma in women masks stable rates in those younger than 50 years since the early 2000s. Liver cancer is also largely preventable (75% of cases are attributed to modifiable risk factors) and has stabilized in men but continues to increase by almost 2% per year in women, consistent with reported differences in generational risk by sex. 61

Urinary bladder cancer incidence decreased by about 1% per year over the past decade in both men and women, as did non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. Kidney cancer incidence rates may have stabilized after decades of increase, largely through incidental detection, because two in three new cases are diagnosed at a localized stage (Figure 4), and death rates continue to decrease. After years of decline, cervical cancer incidence has stabilized over the past decade, and rates also may have plateaued for ovarian cancer. Incidence continued to increase by about 1% per year over the past decade for cancers of the pancreas and oral cavity and pharynx, largely confined to cancers of the tongue, tonsil, and oropharynx (increasing by 1.9% per year), which are usually associated with human papillomavirus (HPV).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Stage distribution for selected cancers by race, United States, 2018–2022. White and Black races are exclusive of Hispanic ethnicity. Stage categories may not sum to 100% because of rounding. aExcludes appendix.

Cancer survival

The 5‐year relative survival for all cancers combined has increased from 49% for diagnoses during the mid‐1970s to a milestone 70% during 2015–2021 (Table 6). Contemporary survival is highest for cancers of the thyroid (98%), prostate (98%), testis (95%), and melanoma (95%) and lowest for cancers of the lung (28%), liver (22%), esophagus (22%), and pancreas (13%). Improvements in survival reflect not only advances in treatment but also temporal changes in tumor subtype distribution and increased diagnosis of asymptomatic tumors through screening and imaging (i.e., incidental detection). Earlier detection has contributed to gains in survival for several cancers (e.g., breast, prostate, and kidney) both by increasing the likelihood of successful treatment and through lead‐time (diagnosis before symptoms) and overdiagnosis (diagnosis of indolent or slow‐growing tumors that will never cause harm). 41 , 62 , 63 Likewise, the three‐fold increase in 5‐year relative survival for people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, from 4% in the mid‐1990s to 13% in 2015–2021, is partly an artifact of an increased number of incidentally detected, well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (from 4% to 10%) that have much higher survival (72%) than more common ductal adenocarcinomas (8%). 64 , 65

TABLE 6.

Trends in 5‐year relative survival (%) by race, United States, 1975–2021.

All races & ethnicities White Black
1975–1977 1995–1997 2015–2021 1975–1977 1995–1997 2015–2021 1975–1977 1995–1997 2015–2021
All sites 49 63 70 50 64 71 39 54 66
Brain & other nervous system 23 32 33 22 31 30 25 39 37
Breast (female) 75 87 92 76 89 94 62 75 84
Colon & rectum a 50 61 65 50 62 65 45 54 59
Colon a 51 61 63 51 62 65 45 54 57
Rectum 48 62 67 48 62 67 44 55 65
Esophagus 5 13 22 6 14 23 4 9 16
Hodgkin lymphoma 72 84 89 72 85 90 70 82 88
Kidney & renal pelvis 50 62 79 50 62 79 49 62 77
Larynx 66 66 62 67 68 63 58 52 56
Leukemia 34 48 68 35 50 69 33 42 62
Liver & intrahepatic bile duct 3 7 22 3 7 21 2 4 21
Lung & bronchus 12 15 28 12 15 28 11 13 25
Melanoma of the skin 82 91 95 82 91 95 57 b 76 b 70
Myeloma 25 32 62 24 32 62 29 32 63
Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma 47 56 74 47 57 76 49 49 70
Oral cavity & pharynx 53 58 69 54 60 71 36 38 57
Ovary 36 43 52 35 43 51 42 36 44
Pancreas 3 4 13 3 4 13 2 4 12
Prostate 68 97 98 69 97 99 61 94 97
Stomach 15 22 38 14 20 38 16 22 40
Testis 83 96 95 83 96 96 73 b , c 86b 88
Thyroid 92 95 98 92 96 99 90 95 97
Urinary bladder 72 80 79 73 81 80 50 63 68
Uterine cervix 69 73 68 70 74 68 65 66 59
Uterine corpus 87 84 81 88 86 85 60 62 63

Note: Relative survival is age adjusted for normal life expectancy and based on cases diagnosed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 areas (1975—1977 and 1995—1997) followed through 2018, and in the SEER 21 areas (2015—2021), followed through 2022. Survival for White and Black people diagnosed during 2015—2021 is exclusive of Hispanic ethnicity.

a

Excludes appendix.

b

The standard error is between 5 and 10 percentage points.

c

For cases diagnosed from 1978 to 1980.

Survival trends are also influenced by temporal changes in anatomic and/or histologic subtypes as a result of shifting risk factor prevalence. For example, the increase in survival for people diagnosed with oral cavity cancers from 58% in the mid‐1990s to 69% in 2015–2021 partly reflects a decreased proportion of smoking‐related cancers and an increased proportion of HPV infection‐associated cancers, which typically have a better prognosis. 66 The proportion of oral cancers associated with HPV (tongue, tonsil, and oropharynx) has increased by greater than 50% during this time period (from 37% to 58%). 7 Conversely, the decrease in uterine corpus cancer survival from 84% to 81% over the past 2 decades reflects an increased proportion of more aggressive nonendometrioid subtypes, from 9% in the mid‐1990s to 21% in 2015–2021, because of rising incidence. 53 The 5‐year survival for nonendometrioid carcinoma improved from 50% to 58% during this time period but remained about 90% for the more common endometroid subtype. 67 , 68

Improved treatment has led to long appreciated survival gains for hematopoietic and lymphoid malignancies. For example, the 5‐year relative survival for chronic myeloid leukemia more than tripled from 22% in the mid‐1970s to 70% for those diagnosed during 2015–2021 because of the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, allowing most patients near‐normal life expectancy. 69 More recently, the development of targeted immunotherapy drugs have boosted survival for myeloma from 32% in the mid‐1990s to 62% in 2015–2021 (Table 6). Treatment advances have also accelerated for many of the most fatal cancers. For example, 5‐year survival for liver cancer has increased three‐fold, from 7% in the mid‐1990s to 22%, with the largest improvement for localized‐stage (from 17% to 38%) and regional‐stage (from 5% to 13%) disease (Table 7) because of improved disease management across the spectrum of treatment for locoregional hepatocellular carcinoma, including the introduction of immunotherapy. 70 , 71 , 72 For advanced liver cancer, systemic therapies have been primarily palliative in nature, with newer immunotherapy drugs offering only a modest improvement in survival. 73 , 74 , 75

TABLE 7.

Trends in 5‐year relative survival (%) by race and stage at diagnosis, United States, 1975–2021.

Relative survival Survival ratio
Stage at diagnosis 1975–1977 1995–1997 2015–2021 2015–2021:1995–1997
All sites Localized 84 88 92 1.0
Regional 51 54 69 1.3
Distant 16 17 35 2.0
Breast (female) Localized 90 98 >99 1.0
Regional 67 80 87 1.1
Distant 19 24 33 1.3
Colon & rectum Localized 82 89 91 1.0
Regional 52 66 74 1.1
Distant 5 8 15 1.8
Colon Localized 85 90 91 1.0
Regional 55 67 74 1.1
Distant 6 9 14 1.6
Rectum Localized 77 86 90 1.1
Regional 45 60 74 1.2
Distant 4 8 18 2.3
Liver & intrahepatic bile duct Localized 8 17 38 2.2
Regional <1 5 13 2.6
Distant 1 3 3 1.3
Lung & bronchus Localized a 48 65 1.4
Regional a 20 37 1.9
Distant a 2 10 4.4
Melanoma of the skin Localized 92 97 >99 1.0
Regional 58 62 76 1.2
Distant 15 16 35 2.2
Ovary Localized 83 92 92 1.0
Regional 49 68 71 1.0
Distant 15 27 32 1.2
Prostate Localized a >99 b >99 1.0
Regional a >99 1.0
Distant a 32 38 1.2
Stomach Localized 53 58 77 1.3
Regional 14 22 37 1.7
Distant 2 3 8 2.8

Note: Relative survival is age adjusted for normal life expectancy and based on cases diagnosed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 areas (1975–1977 and 1995–1997), followed through 2018, and the SEER 21 areas (2015–2021), followed through 2022. Survival for White and Black people diagnosed during 2015–2021 is exclusive of Hispanic ethnicity.

a

Data are unavailable because of changes in stage classification.

b

Localized and regional stage are combined.

In contrast, there have been substantial gains in survival for many other advanced cancers because of a stream of game‐changing, targeted therapies. For all cancers combined, 5‐year relative survival increased from 54% to 69% for regional‐stage disease and from 17% to 35% for distant‐stage disease between the mid‐1990s and 2015–2021. The most notable progress was for both regional‐stage (from 20% to 37%) and distant‐stage (from 2% to 10%) lung cancer and for distant‐stage melanoma (from 16% to 35%), rectal cancer (from 8% to 18%), and stomach cancer (from 3% to 8%; Table 7). Increased longevity not only gives tens of thousands of people more time with family and friends but also benefits the economy by prolonging workforce and consumer participation. The impact is particularly large for high‐mortality cancers like lung and liver cancers, which are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage (72% and 58%, respectively; Figure 4). These remarkable strides are the return on investment of decades of basic research that has unraveled the molecular intricacies of how cancer grows and spreads and clinical trials that have informed disease management. 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 For people with advanced cancer that does not respond to therapy, a comfort‐focused, end‐of‐life experience is often preferred, yet many patients continue to receive life‐extending care against their wishes and/or despite no survival benefit, 81 underscoring the importance of communication across the treatment continuum.

Trends in cancer mortality

Mortality rates are a better indicator of progress against cancer than incidence or survival because they are less affected by detection biases, such as screening and incidental diagnosis. 82 Cancer mortality rose during most of the 20th century (Figure 5), largely because of a rapid increase in lung cancer among men as a consequence of the tobacco epidemic. However, reductions in smoking as well as improvements in disease management and earlier diagnosis have resulted in a 34% overall drop in the cancer death rate from 1991 through 2023, translating to an estimated 4.8 million fewer cancer deaths (3,256,800 in men and 1,555,300 in women) than if mortality had remained at its peak (Figure 6). The number of averted deaths is twice as large for men as for women because the death rate in men peaked higher and declined faster (Figure 5). The contribution of treatment advances to declining mortality has accelerated over the past decade; a recent study estimated that improvements in stage‐specific survival (described in the section above) accounted for nearly 174,000 fewer cancer deaths from 2010 through 2019. 83

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Trends in cancer mortality rates by sex overall and for selected cancers by sex, United States, 1930–2023. Rates are age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. Because of historical improvements in International Classification of Diseases coding over time, numerator data for lung and bronchus includes pleura, trachea, mediastinum, and other respiratory organs; colon and rectum includes small intestine; and liver includes intrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder, and other biliary sites. aIncludes uterine corpus and uterine cervix and is not adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Total number of cancer deaths averted during 1991–2023 in men and 1992–2023 in women, United States. The blue line represents the actual number of cancer deaths recorded in each year; the red line represents the number of cancer deaths that would have been expected if cancer death rates had remained at their peak.

Despite decades of decline, lung cancer mortality continues to dwarf other cancers, especially among men (Figure 5). The lung cancer death rate has dropped by 62% from the peak in 1990 among men and by 38% from the peak in 2002 among women, consistent with the later downturn in incidence. Over the past decade (2014–2023), the death rate declined by 4.7% per year in men and by 3.5% per year in women (Table 8), steeper than reductions in incidence (Table 5) because of earlier detection and treatment advances that have extended survival. 56 , 78 Mortality declines have accelerated for all lung cancers, regardless of whether they are associated with smoking, but are more rapid for smoking‐related cancers because of reductions in incidence. 84 Declines in lung cancer mortality are also faster in people who live in urban versus rural areas. 85 Low‐dose computed tomography screening reduces the odds of lung cancer mortality by 16%–24% among high‐risk individuals 86 , 87 and is associated with a substantial survival advantage, 88 but it remains underutilized. In 2022, only 18% of people who were eligible for lung cancer screening according to USPSTF guidelines had a test in the past year, with the lowest prevalence in people who were younger than 60 years (<13%) and Native American people (14% vs. 20% of Black people and 18% of White people). 89 Notably, Native American people also have the highest lung cancer mortality at 38.7 per 100,000 compared with 34.5 per 100,000 in White people, who rank second, and 33.1 per 100,000 in Black people, who rank third (Table 9).

TABLE 8.

Trends in mortality rates for selected cancers by sex, United States, 1975 to 2023.

Trend 1 Trend 2 Trend 3 Trend 4 Trend 5 Trend 6 AAPC
Years APC Years APC Years APC Years APC Years APC Years APC 2019–2023 2014–2023
All sites 1975–1991 0.5 a 1991–2001 −1.0 a 2001–2023 −1.5 a −1.5 a −1.5 a
Male 1975–1980 0.9 a 1980–1990 0.3 a 1990–1993 −0.4 1993–2001 −1.5 a 2001–2023 ‐1.8 a −1.8 a −1.8 a
Female 1975–1991 0.6 a 1991–2001 −0.7 a 2001–2023 −1.3 a −1.3 a −1.3 a
Female breast 1975–1990 0.4 a 1990–1995 −1.8 a 1995–1998 −3.3 a 1998–2010 −1.9 a 2010–2023 −1.2 a −1.2 a −1.2 a
Colon & rectum 1975–1984 −0.5 a 1984–2002 −1.8 a 2002–2005 −3.8 a 2005–2012 −2.4 a 2012–2020 −1.7 a 2020–2023 −0.6 −0.9 a −1.3 a
Male 1975–1979 0.6 1979–1987 −0.6 a 1987–2002 −1.9 a 2002–2005 −4.1 a 2005–2014 −2.5 a 2014–2023 −1.4 a −1.4 a −1.4 a
Female 1975–1984 −1.0 a 1984–2001 −1.8 a 2001–2011 −2.9 a 2011–2023 −1.5 a −1.5 a −1.5 a
Liver & intrahepatic bile duct 1975–1980 0.2 1980–1987 2.0 a 1987–1996 3.8 a 1996–2000 0.7 2000–2015 2.6 a 2015–2023 −0.3 a −0.3 a 0.0
Male 1975–1985 1.5 a 1985–1996 3.8 a 1996–1999 0.3 1999–2013 2.7 a 2013–2017 0.7 2017–2023 −1.0 a −1.0 a −0.4
Female 1975–1984 0.2 1984–1995 3.1 a 1995–2008 1.2 a 2008–2014 3.3 a 2014–2023 0.9 a 0.9 a 0.9 a
Lung & bronchus 1975–1980 3.0 a 1980–1990 1.8 a 1990–1995 −0.2 1995–2005 −1.0 a 2005–2013 −2.2 a 2013–2023 −4.1 a −4.1 a −4.1 a
Male 1975–1982 1.8 a 1982–1991 0.4 a 1991–2005 −1.9 a 2005–2013 −2.9 a 2013–2023 −4.7 a −4.7 a −4.7 a
Female 1975–1983 5.9 a 1983–1992 3.8 a 1992–2004 0.5 a 2004–2014 −1.6 a 2014–2020 −4.0 a 2020–2023 −2.6 a −2.9 a −3.5 a
Melanoma of skin 1975–1988 1.6 a 1988–2013 0.0 2013–2017 −5.9 a 2017–2023 −1.2 a −1.2 a −2.8 a
Male 1975–1989 2.3 a 1989–2013 0.3 a 2013–2017 −6.4 a 2017–2023 −1.5 a −1.5 a −3.2 a
Female 1975–1988 0.8 a 1988–2013 −0.5 a 2013–2017 −5.3 a 2017–2023 −0.7 −0.7 −2.3 a
Oral cavity & pharynx 1975–1991 −1.5 a 1991–2000 −2.6 a 2000–2009 −1.4 a 2009–2023 0.8 a 0.8 a 0.8 a
Male 1975–2007 −2.1 a 2007–2023 0.7 a 0.7 a 0.7 a
Female 1975–1989 −0.9 a 1989–2009 −2.2 a 2009–2023 0.6 a 0.6 a 0.6 a
Tongue, tonsil, oropharynx 1975–2000 −1.6 a 2000–2009 −0.2 2009–2023 2.1 a 2.1 a 2.1 a
Other oral cavity 1975–1993 −1.6 a 1993–2006 −3.0 a 2006–2023 −0.6 a −0.6 a −0.6 a
Ovary 1975–1982 −1.2 a 1982–1992 0.3 a 1992–1998 −1.2 a 1998–2003 0.5 2003–2017 −2.1 a 2014–2023 −3.0 a −3.0 a −2.7 a
Pancreas 1975–1993 −0.0 1993–1996 −0.7 1996–2021 0.3 a 2021–2023 −0.9 −0.3 0.1
Male 1975–1986 −0.8 a 1986–2000 −0.3 a 2000–2021 0.3 a 2021–2023 −1.0 −0.3 0.0
Female 1975–1983 0.8 a 1983–1993 0.3 a 1993–1997 −0.4 1997–2020 0.4 a 2020–2023 −0.4 −0.2 0.1
Prostate 1975–1987 1.0 a 1987–1990 3.4 1990–1993 1.0 1993–2012 −3.5 a 2012–2023 −0.6 a −0.6 a −0.6 a
Uterine cervix b 1975–1985 −4.3 a 1982–1996 −1.6 a 1996–2003 −3.9 a 2003–2023 −0.7 a −0.7 a −0.7 a
Uterine corpus b 1975–1989 −1.6 a 1989–1997 −0.7 a 1997–2009 0.4 a 2009–2016 2.4 a 2016–2023 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.6 a

Note: Trends were analyzed using the Joinpoint Regression Program, version 5.4.0.0, allowing up to five joinpoints.

Abbreviations: AAPC, average annual percent change; APC, annual percent change (based on mortality rates age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population).

a

The APC or AAPC is significantly different from zero (p < .05).

b

Not adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence.

TABLE 9.

Incidence and mortality rates for selected cancers by race and ethnicity, United States.

All races & ethnicities White Black American Indian/Alaskan Native a Asian American/Pacific Islander Hispanic/Latino
Incidence, 2018–2022
All sites 460.6 482.2 467.7 497.8 311.2 369.8
Male 497.9 518.0 541.1 518.7 304.4 383.5
Female 436.0 458.4 418.2 488.8 321.5 368.3
Breast (female) 133.5 139.5 133.2 125.2 112.5 106.6
Colon & rectum b 35.3 35.2 40.4 51.1 28.5 32.7
Male 40.5 40.2 48.1 58.5 33.5 38.4
Female 30.7 30.7 34.7 44.9 24.3 27.9
Kidney & renal pelvis 18.0 18.2 19.5 34.1 8.4 18.6
Male 24.3 24.7 26.7 45.1 11.8 24.1
Female 12.4 12.3 13.9 24.8 5.6 13.9
Liver & intrahepatic bile duct 8.9 7.7 10.1 18.7 11.4 14.1
Male 13.1 11.3 16.0 25.2 17.2 20.1
Female 5.2 4.4 5.5 13.2 6.7 8.9
Lung & bronchus 53.2 57.8 54.8 63.0 33.2 28.3
Male 59.0 62.6 68.6 66.8 39.7 33.0
Female 48.8 54.3 45.2 60.5 28.2 24.9
Prostate 122.3 118.4 198.9 100.6 66.6 95.5
Stomach 6.6 5.3 10.1 10.5 9.0 9.6
Male 8.5 7.2 12.9 13.6 11.6 11.4
Female 5.0 3.7 8.2 8.0 7.0 8.2
Uterine cervix c 9.7 9.0 12.1 16.1 6.7 12.2
Uterine corpus c 42.3 42.2 52.6 49.5 26.6 37.8
Mortality, 2019–2023
All sites 145.4 151.2 166.5 176.0 93.1 106.0
Male 171.5 178.0 203.6 200.6 107.1 124.4
Female 126.3 131.2 143.7 159.9 83.1 93.2
Breast (female) 19.2 19.3 26.5 20.9 11.8 13.6
Colon & rectum 12.9 12.9 16.6 18.6 9.2 10.6
Male 15.3 15.2 21.0 21.9 10.9 13.2
Female 10.8 10.9 13.4 16.0 7.8 8.6
Kidney & renal pelvis 3.4 3.6 3.3 6.4 1.6 3.2
Male 5.1 5.3 4.9 9.3 2.4 4.7
Female 2.1 2.2 2.1 4.1 1.0 2.1
Liver & intrahepatic bile duct 6.6 6.0 7.7 12.5 8.0 8.9
Male 9.4 8.5 12.0 17.1 11.4 12.2
Female 4.3 3.9 4.6 8.8 5.2 6.1
Lung & bronchus 31.5 34.5 33.1 38.7 18.6 14.2
Male 37.2 39.6 44.5 43.2 23.4 18.7
Female 27.1 30.5 25.3 35.6 15.0 10.9
Prostate 19.2 18.4 36.9 20.5 8.8 15.4
Stomach 2.7 2.0 4.5 5.0 4.1 4.5
Male 3.5 2.8 6.4 6.6 5.2 5.4
Female 2.0 1.4 3.2 3.9 3.3 3.7
Uterine cervix c 3.0 2.9 5.0 5.1 1.9 3.2
Uterine corpus c 8.8 8.1 18.4 9.7 4.7 6.7

Note: Rates are per 100,000 persons and age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. Incidence is adjusted for delays in case reporting. All racial groups are exclusive of Hispanic ethnicity.

a

To reduce racial misclassification, incidence rates are limited to Purchased/Referred Care Delivery Area counties, and mortality rates (for the entire United States) are adjusted using factors from the National Center for Health Statistics.

b

Excludes appendix.

c

Adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence.

Sustained reductions in mortality for CRC, the second‐most common cause of cancer death in men and women combined, are the result of changing patterns in risk factors (e.g., declines in smoking), screening uptake, and improved treatment. The CRC death rate has dropped by 55% among males since 1980 and by 60% among females since 1969. 9 (Although the rate in women began declining prior to 1969, as shown in Figure 5, those historical data include deaths from cancer in the small intestine and thus are not comparable to contemporary rates.) From 2014 to 2023, the CRC death rate decreased by 1.3% per year overall (Table 8) but increased by about 1% per year in adults younger than 55 years. The death rate for pancreatic cancer, the third most common cancer death, increased gradually since the mid‐1990s but was stable over the past 5 data years, perhaps reflecting earlier diagnosis, including of some less aggressive neuroendocrine tumors. 90

Female breast cancer mortality peaked in 1989 and has since decreased by 44% through 2023, translating to the avoidance of an estimated 546,000 deaths. A recent study attributed three fourths of this progress to treatment advances and the remainder to earlier diagnosis through screening. 91 Declines in breast cancer mortality have slowed from 2% per year during the 2000s to 1% per year since 2010 (Table 8), reflecting relatively stable mammography prevalence over the past 2 decades and perhaps increased incidence. Increased incidence also may be contributing to a deceleration in the decline for prostate cancer mortality, from 3.5% per year during the late 1990s and 2000s to 0.6% per year from 2012 through 2023 (Table 8, Figure 5). The prostate cancer death rate in 2023 was 53% lower than the peak in 1993 because of earlier detection through PSA screening and advances in treatment. 92 , 93

Melanoma mortality declined by nearly 6% per year during 2013–2017 after 2 decades of stable rates because of breakthrough treatments for metastatic disease, although the pace slowed to 1.2% per year during 2017–2023 (Table 8). Declining mortality trends for melanoma, as well as leukemia (since at least 1975), kidney (since early 1990s), prostate, and breast cancer, are particularly notable given increasing incidence rates and underscore the impact of advances in treatment. Steeper declines in ovarian cancer mortality (2.7% per year) compared with incidence (1% per year; nonsignificant) over the past decade likely also reflect small gains in survival for advanced disease (Table 7) as well as a shift toward earlier diagnosis; 49% of ovarian cancers were diagnosed at a distant stage in 2018–2022 (Figure 4), down from 57% a decade earlier. 7 Liver cancer mortality finally began decreasing in men by 1% per year since 2017 after decades of increase but continued to increase in women, albeit at a slowed pace of 1% per year, over the past decade. Mortality rates also continued to rise for uterine corpus cancer, continuing a 26‐year trend with an annual percent increase of 1.6% per year from 2014 through 2023, and for HPV‐associated oral cancers (tongue, tonsil, and oropharynx) by 2% per year since 2009 (Table 8).

Recorded number of deaths in 2023

In total, 3,090,964 deaths were recorded in the United States in 2023 (Table 10). This was 188,893 fewer deaths than in 2022, similar to the drop from 2021 to 2022, and reflects 136,620 fewer deaths from coronavirus disease 2019, which fell from the fourth‐leading cause of death in 2022 (186,552 deaths) to the tenth in 2023 (49,932 deaths). From 2022 to 2023, the age‐adjusted death rate decreased overall (by 8%) and for every leading cause of death including cancer, which decreased by 1.5%, despite 4981 more cancer deaths in 2023 because of the aging and growth of the population.

TABLE 10.

Leading causes of death in the United States in 2023 versus 2022.

Cause of death 2023 2022
Rank No. Rate Percent Rank No. Rate Percent
All causes 3,090,964 748.8 3,279,857 812.5
Heart diseases 1 680,981 161.4 22% 1 702,880 170.6 21%
Cancer 2 613,352 141.4 20% 2 608,371 143.6 19%
Accidents (unintentional injuries) 3 222,698 62.3 7% 3 227,039 64.4 7%
Cerebrovascular diseases 4 162,639 38.9 5% 5 165,393 40.6 5%
Chronic lower respiratory diseases 5 145,357 33.4 5% 6 147,382 34.9 4%
Alzheimer disease 6 114,034 27.7 4% 7 120,122 30.1 4%
Diabetes mellitus 7 95,190 22.4 3% 8 101,209 24.3 3%
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis 8 55,253 13.1 2% 9 57,937 14.1 2%
Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis 9 52,222 13.0 2% 10 54,803 13.8 2%
COVID‐19 10 49,932 11.9 2% 4 186,552 44.5 6%

Note: Counts include unknown age. Rates are per 100,000 persons, exclude people with unknown age, and are age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (5‐year age groups: <1 years, ages 1–4 years through 90 years and older). Death rates presented herein use the vintage 2023 population estimates release on July 1, 2023. Those population estimates differ from prior estimates; therefore, some data are published elsewhere (for more information, see https://seer.cancer.gov/popdata/).

Abbreviation: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019.

Although cancer remained the second‐leading cause of death after heart disease in both men and women overall, it is the leading cause of death among men aged 60–79 years and women aged 40–79 years (Table 11). Table 12 presents the number of deaths in 2023 for the five leading cancer types by age and sex. Brain and other nervous system (hereafter brain) tumors are the leading cause of cancer death among children and adolescents younger than 20 years (533 deaths), followed by leukemia (453 deaths). Brain is also the leading cancer death in men aged 20–39 years but ranks fourth among women in this age group. Breast cancer is the leading cancer death among women younger than 50 years, and lung cancer leads among both men and women aged 50 years and older.

TABLE 11.

Five leading causes of death in the United States by age and sex, 2023.

Ranking All ages 1–19 years 20–39 years 40–59 years 60–79 years 80 years and older
Male
All causes 1,617,085 15,117 95,043 234,712 707,005 554,046
1 Heart diseases Accidents (unintentional injuries) Accidents (unintentional injuries) Heart diseases Cancer Heart diseases
376,011 5351 42,501 48,059 185,881 152,015
2 Cancer Assault (homicide) Intentional self‐harm (suicide) Accidents (unintentional injuries) Heart diseases Cancer
322,092 2810 13,362 47,738 169,846 93,081
3 Accidents (unintentional injuries) Intentional self‐harm (suicide) Assault (homicide) Cancer Chronic lower respiratory diseases Cerebrovascular diseases
148,651 1917 9457 38,170 37,454 33,113
4 Cerebrovascular diseases Cancer Heart diseases Intentional self‐harm (suicide) Accidents (unintentional injuries) Alzheimer disease
70,920 963 5602 12,248 34,647 26,900
5 Chronic lower respiratory diseases Congenital anomalies Cancer Chronic liver disease & cirrhosis Cerebrovascular diseases Chronic lower respiratory diseases
67,494 589 3966 11,922 29,969 25,819
Female
All causes 1,473,879 7724 40,323 139,014 538,400 739,355
1 Heart diseases Accidents (unintentional injuries) Accidents (unintentional injuries) Cancer Cancer Heart diseases
304,970 2,459 14,977 39,231 155,478 183,459
2 Cancer Cancer Cancer Heart diseases Heart diseases Cancer
291,260 819 4350 20,508 98,026 91,363
3 Cerebrovascular diseases Intentional self‐harm (suicide) Intentional self‐harm (suicide) Accidents (unintentional injuries) Chronic lower respiratory diseases Alzheimer disease
91,719 726 3200 17,913 37,688 63,434
4 Alzheimer disease Assault (homicide) Heart diseases Chronic liver disease & cirrhosis Cerebrovascular diseases Cerebrovascular diseases
77,974 638 2606 6482 27,191 58,913
5 Chronic lower respiratory diseases Congenital anomalies Assault (homicide) Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus Chronic lower respiratory diseases
77,863 462 1869 5150 19,478 35,738

Note: Deaths within each age group do not sum to all ages combined because of the inclusion of unknown ages and deaths occurring in individuals younger than 1 year. In accordance with the National Center for Health Statistics' cause‐of‐death ranking, symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical or laboratory findings and categories that begin with other and all other were not ranked, and assault excludes legal intervention.

TABLE 12.

Five leading causes of cancer death in the United States by age and sex, 2023.

All ages Birth to 19 years 20–39 years 40–49 years 50–64 years 65–79 years 80 years and older
Sexes combined
All sites 613,352 1829 8316 18,850 123,009 276,901 184,444
1 Lung & bronchus Brain & ONS Breast Breast Lung & bronchus Lung & bronchus Lung & bronchus
131,584 533 1045 2764 26,276 67,958 35,228
2 Colon & rectum Leukemia Colon & rectum Colon & rectum Colon & rectum Pancreas Prostate
53,779 453 964 2941 13,258 24,398 16,598
3 Pancreas Bones & joints Brain & ONS Lung & bronchus Pancreas Colon & rectum Colon & rectum
49,451 231 874 1774 10,271 20,562 16,044
4 Breast Soft tissue a Leukemia Brain & ONS Breast Breast Pancreas
42,724 159 684 1212 10,214 16,196 13,559
5 Prostate Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma Uterine cervix Pancreas Liver b Liver b Breast
33,881 52 396 1051 6868 15,671 12,505
Male
All sites 322,092 992 3966 8524 64,426 151,101 93,081
1 Lung & bronchus Leukemia Brain & ONS Colon & rectum Lung & bronchus Lung & bronchus Lung & bronchus
68,697 269 559 1681 14,045 36,437 17,037
2 Prostate Brain & ONS Colon & rectum Lung & bronchus Colon & rectum Prostate Prostate
33,881 267 554 977 8067 14,215 16,598
3 Colon & rectum Bones & joints Leukemia Brain & ONS Pancreas Pancreas Colon & rectum
29,132 139 421 727 5850 13,070 7112
4 Pancreas Soft tissue a Testis Pancreas Liver b Colon & rectum Urinary bladder
25,590 78 247 630 4822 11,710 5972
5 Liver b Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma Esophagus Esophagus Liver b Pancreas
19,401 33 237 396 3250 10,615 5935
Female
All sites 291,260 837 4350 10,326 58,583 125,800 91,363
1 Lung & bronchus Brain & ONS Breast Breast Lung & bronchus Lung & bronchus Lung & bronchus
62,887 266 1040 2742 12,231 31,521 18,191
2 Breast Leukemia Colon & rectum Colon & rectum Breast Breast Breast
42,213 184 410 1260 10,102 15,959 12,370
3 Colon & rectum Bones & joints Uterine cervix Lung & bronchus Colon & rectum Pancreas Colon & rectum
24,647 92 396 797 5191 11,328 8932
4 Pancreas Soft tissue a Brain & ONS Uterine cervix Pancreas Colon & rectum Pancreas
23,861 81 315 710 4421 8852 7624
5 Uterine corpus Kidney c Leukemia Ovary Ovary Uterine corpus Leukemia
13,342 25 263 530 3140 6702 4031

Abbreviation: ONS, other nervous system.

a

Includes heart.

b

Includes intrahepatic bile duct.

c

Includes renal pelvis.

Cancer disparities by race and ethnicity

This section highlights the most striking cancer disparities among the five broadly defined racial and ethnic groups shown in Table 9. Although race and ethnicity are social constructs that aggregate heterogeneous populations, they are useful for examining the influence of discrimination and inequality in health disparities. Cancer incidence and mortality are highest among AIAN people overall and in women, whereas Black men have the highest sex‐specific rates. The incidence rate in Black men during 2018–2022 was 78% higher than in AANHPI men (541 vs. 304 per 100,000), who have the lowest rate of any sex–race group. AANHPI people are the only group for which incidence in men is lower than in women (322 per 100,000).

The disproportionate mortality burden in AIAN people is driven by the highest death rates for five of the nine cancer types shown in Table 9, including approximately two‐fold the mortality in White people for cancers of the kidney, liver, stomach, and cervix. High mortality in Black men is largely because of the remarkable burden of prostate cancer, with death rates approximately two to four times those in all other men. Black women have the highest breast and uterine corpus cancer mortality, with the latter approximately two‐fold that of all other women. Although Hispanic and AANHPI people have relatively low risk for most common cancers, liver cancer mortality in these populations is approximately 30%–50% higher and stomach cancer mortality is two‐fold higher than that in White people. However, these aggregated data mask larger and additional disparities for population subgroups. For example, Pacific Islander people have three‐fold higher stomach cancer mortality and two and one half‐fold to three‐fold higher rates of uterine corpus and cervical cancer mortality compared with White women; 94 overall cancer mortality in Pacific Islander people is twice that in Asian Americans among women and 50% higher among men. These cancer disparities are largely attributed to a higher prevalence of risk factors, medical mistrust, and lack of insurance, which hinders access to high‐quality health care. 95

Unconscious bias and treatment inequality also contribute to disparities. Cancer survival is lower among Black people than White people for nearly every cancer type, even after controlling for stage at diagnosis (Figure 7) and socioeconomic status. 96 A higher likelihood of more aggressive disease (e.g., triple‐negative breast cancer, nonendometrioid uterine corpus cancer) explains a small portion of this gap, but the largest contributor is less access to high‐quality care across the cancer continuum, from prevention to diagnosis and treatment. 97 For example, Black women have up to twice the risk of White women of not receiving guideline‐concordant diagnostic evaluation for uterine corpus and breast cancer. 98 , 99 , 100 These inequalities translate to later stage diagnosis; only 56% of uterine corpus cancers and 58% of breast cancers are diagnosed at a localized stage in Black women versus 71% and 69%, respectively, in White women (Figure 4). A recent study estimated that CRC mortality rates in Black people would be reduced by 19%, eliminating two thirds of the Black–White disparity, merely by ensuring the same quality screening as White people. 101 Asian, Black, and Hispanic people are less likely to receive both a physician recommendation for cancer screening 102 and recommended germline genetic testing, a necessary step for receipt of targeted therapies that have improved survival for numerous cancers. 103 Lack of diversity in clinical trials also contributes to racial and ethnic disparities in treatment and is an area of increasing focus. 104

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Five‐year relative survival for selected cancers by race and stage at diagnosis, United States, 2015–2021. All cases were followed through 2022. White and Black races are exclusive of Hispanic ethnicity. aExcludes appendix. bStandard error is between 5 and 10 percentage points.

Disparities in cancer occurrence and outcomes in large part are rooted in socioeconomic deprivation stemming from inequities that limit opportunities for education and other mechanisms of upward mobility that facilitate economic security. 105 For example, although the practice of mortgage lending discrimination known as redlining ended decades ago, people who live in these areas continue to have later stage cancer diagnoses, lower likelihood of receiving recommended treatment, and higher cancer mortality compared with those who do not. 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 Inequalities in socioeconomic status lead to differences in the prevalence of risk factor exposures as well as access to high‐quality cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment. 112 , 113 For example, smoking prevalence in 2023 was 27% in men without a high school diploma versus 5% in men who graduated from college, 27 partly because of targeted advertising in lower income neighborhoods. 114 Similarly, minoritized groups are disproportionately exposed to environmental toxins, such as hazardous soil, water, and air pollutants, that are associated with higher cancer incidence, 115 although exposure to carcinogenic air emissions is reported to be up to 50% higher among people experiencing poverty, regardless of race or ethnicity. 116 Persistent poverty ranks among the leading causes of death alongside smoking 117 and is consistently associated with higher cancer incidence, later stage diagnosis, and worse outcomes. 96 , 118 , 119 The effects of poverty are both compounded by and independent of racial status. One study found that living in a disadvantaged neighborhood increased the likelihood of aggressive prostate cancer by 30% among Black men, but had no impact in White men, suggesting the contribution of race‐specific factors, such as minority stress. 120 The pathway through which social processes, such as those that develop from living in an unsafe neighborhood, may influence cancer development and progression is an evolving area of research. 121

Geographic variation in cancer occurrence

Table 13 shows 5‐year average annual cancer incidence and mortality rates for selected cancers by state. Geographic variation reflects population demographic characteristics and differences in the prevalence of cancer risk factors, early detection practices, and access to care, including state and local public health policies. States have a large influence on the health of their residents by controlling accessibility and affordability of health insurance through the Marketplace and Medicaid. 122 , 123 Cancer death rates range from 122 to 128 per 100,000 in Utah, Hawaii, New York, and Colorado to 178–180 per 100,000 in West Virginia, Mississippi, and Kentucky. This gap is driven largely by lung cancer and mirrors patterns in smoking prevalence, which have remained consistent geographically despite temporal declines. In 2023, the highest smoking prevalence was in West Virginia (22%), Tennessee (18%), and Mississippi (17%), compared with 6% in Utah and 9% in California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, New Jersey, and Washington. 124 Kentucky smoking prevalence was unavailable in 2023, but it was 18% in 2022. 125

TABLE 13.

Incidence (2018–2022) and mortality (2019–2023) rates for selected cancers by state, United States.

State All sites Female breast Colon & rectum a Lung & bronchus Prostate Uterine cervix b
Incidence Mortality Incidence Mortality Incidence Mortality Incidence Mortality Incidence Mortality Incidence Mortality
Alabama 435.7 159.1 128.6 20.4 38.5 14.5 57.8 39.1 115.0 19.9 14.5 5.8
Alaska 450.6 148.9 135.4 17.3 40.2 14.4 53.4 31.3 113.7 21.7 8.6 3.0
Arizona 409.9 132.3 122.7 18.7 31.5 12.3 41.7 25.0 88.2 17.7 8.7 3.0
Arkansas c 487.0 168.5 124.8 20.1 41.6 15.5 74.4 44.6 118.5 20.0 14.0 5.3
California 415.8 131.9 127.3 18.7 33.1 12.0 36.7 22.6 107.0 20.3 8.9 2.7
Colorado 402.9 127.6 135.0 18.8 29.6 11.4 37.2 21.8 105.5 22.0 7.5 2.2
Connecticut 491.2 133.3 148.6 16.6 33.0 10.3 54.7 27.4 144.3 19.1 6.7 1.8
Delaware 482.7 156.0 146.7 22.0 32.1 12.3 56.9 34.9 141.5 20.0 9.1 2.5
District of Columbia 426.5 144.7 139.7 23.2 34.9 13.5 45.1 26.0 139.4 27.5 9.4 2.6
Florida 496.1 138.3 133.9 18.7 35.7 12.0 54.4 30.7 124.8 16.7 12.2 3.7
Georgia 478.6 150.7 135.2 21.0 38.2 13.7 55.9 32.7 144.2 21.7 11.0 3.8
Hawaii 410.8 121.6 139.2 16.8 36.6 12.1 38.2 23.3 105.4 14.8 7.9 2.1
Idaho 458.5 138.6 134.5 19.0 33.8 12.4 44.7 25.3 124.2 21.7 9.1 2.7
Illinois 474.8 149.7 136.4 19.7 37.5 13.3 58.5 33.7 129.1 19.0 8.9 2.8
Indiana d 487.0 165.4 130.9 20.3 39.2 14.9 69.6 41.6 121.9 20.6 11.6 3.9
Iowa 506.7 149.2 137.7 17.4 38.1 13.3 60.6 34.3 133.5 19.6 9.0 2.0
Kansas e 461.2 152.6 136.5 19.7 37.3 13.9 52.2 35.6 125.5 18.0 11.3 3.5
Kentucky 528.3 180.4 131.4 21.7 44.5 16.5 84.8 50.2 119.9 18.4 12.9 4.2
Louisiana 497.0 165.1 132.4 21.8 42.7 15.4 61.4 39.7 150.2 19.4 13.9 4.7
Maine 495.1 159.1 136.6 17.2 33.4 12.5 67.3 38.4 114.4 21.4 7.6 2.1
Maryland 459.0 141.2 140.0 19.7 33.7 12.5 49.5 29.2 145.4 20.4 7.6 2.6
Massachusetts 453.5 136.1 141.0 15.2 30.3 10.1 57.5 29.6 121.7 18.3 5.7 1.5
Michigan 457.8 157.4 132.4 19.7 34.3 13.5 59.6 37.4 122.6 19.1 8.4 2.8
Minnesota 495.7 141.4 143.0 17.2 34.3 11.4 54.8 29.4 123.8 19.7 6.7 1.8
Mississippi 485.3 179.0 127.0 23.6 45.0 17.7 69.5 45.9 145.5 24.8 14.6 6.4
Missouri 483.5 162.2 139.8 20.2 38.9 14.1 69.3 41.5 109.0 19.2 11.2 3.5
Montana 465.4 141.8 140.5 18.1 35.1 12.4 45.8 26.9 135.6 22.0 9.2 1.9
Nebraska 456.8 148.7 130.4 20.1 36.7 14.5 51.9 31.5 121.0 19.2 8.6 2.5
Nevada 398.4 144.8 113.3 21.4 34.2 13.9 44.1 30.1 101.3 20.7 10.9 3.6
New Hampshire 485.9 145.2 142.3 17.9 31.9 10.9 59.3 31.8 123.0 19.8 6.4 1.6
New Jersey 487.0 130.1 139.7 18.9 36.7 11.7 49.2 25.8 148.6 16.1 8.3 2.2
New Mexico 388.0 131.4 118.7 19.3 32.6 12.2 32.8 20.9 96.1 19.7 10.2 3.0
New York 473.7 125.6 136.5 16.6 34.1 10.9 52.8 25.7 138.5 15.4 8.2 2.1
North Carolina 493.0 154.1 147.8 19.8 34.4 12.8 62.7 36.9 138.7 20.6 9.5 3.0
North Dakota 464.3 136.4 132.4 16.1 38.3 12.5 54.6 29.7 125.9 17.7 6.8 1.9
Ohio 484.0 160.3 134.9 20.1 36.8 13.7 64.8 38.7 125.5 19.5 10.2 3.3
Oklahoma 463.1 174.3 128.0 22.2 39.2 16.4 63.3 43.9 111.7 20.7 14.6 5.4
Oregon 431.1 149.1 133.6 19.3 31.1 12.1 48.1 30.2 107.8 21.4 8.1 2.7
Pennsylvania 464.8 151.6 134.2 19.2 35.5 13.0 57.1 33.3 115.2 18.5 8.6 2.6
Rhode Island 467.2 142.0 142.3 16.2 30.3 10.8 60.2 32.1 127.0 18.3 7.8 1.6
South Carolina 446.9 156.8 137.3 21.0 34.5 13.7 57.9 36.5 119.5 21.3 10.8 4.0
South Dakota 477.8 151.1 134.8 17.3 38.2 13.7 54.5 33.1 136.7 20.8 7.1 3.2
Tennessee 465.2 167.7 128.1 21.5 37.2 15.2 67.2 43.6 120.4 19.9 10.7 4.3
Texas 446.5 142.9 127.6 19.6 37.3 13.9 46.1 28.2 118.6 18.4 13.0 4.2
Utah 427.9 121.5 123.5 20.3 27.7 11.0 25.1 15.5 129.8 22.5 8.0 2.6
Vermont 462.7 150.6 132.5 16.7 30.6 12.9 54.7 31.7 117.3 21.7 7.2 2.2
Virginia 423.1 147.9 132.7 19.9 32.3 13.1 51.5 32.5 116.6 20.6 7.8 2.6
Washington 448.3 144.8 139.7 18.8 32.4 12.1 48.8 29.1 108.2 21.2 8.3 2.3
West Virginia 511.5 177.9 130.0 20.8 42.9 16.6 77.1 48.2 108.4 18.8 13.4 4.6
Wisconsin 480.7 148.5 138.8 17.4 33.0 11.6 55.6 31.8 130.8 21.7 7.7 2.0
Wyoming 408.8 144.0 126.6 19.6 34.2 14.5 38.2 27.9 111.5 19.3 13.0 3.5
Puerto Rico f 369.5 100.7 102.7 15.4 38.0 12.8 15.7 10.4 155.8 19.3 15.2 2.2
United States g 460.6 145.4 133.5 19.2 35.3 12.9 53.2 31.5 122.3 19.2 9.7 3.0

Note: Rates are per 100,000 persons, age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups, and incidence rates are adjusted for delays in case reporting.

a

Incidence rates exclude appendix.

b

Adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence.

c

Incidence rates based on cases diagnosed during 2016–2020.

d

Incidence rates based on cases diagnosed during 2017–2021.

e

Incidence rates are not adjusted for delays in case reporting.

f

Incidence rates are not adjusted for delays in case reporting. Mortality rates are for 2018–2022 and were obtained from statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov. Uterine cervix mortality is not adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence.

g

Rates exclude Kansas and Puerto Rico.

Although cervical cancer is mostly preventable, state‐level incidence rates (corrected for hysterectomy prevalence) vary by more than two‐fold, from six per 100,000 women in Massachusetts and New Hampshire to 14–15 per 100,000 women in Mississippi, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana (Table 13). Advances in cancer control create and/or exacerbate disparities because of unequal dissemination of interventions. Although HPV vaccination can virtually eliminate cervical cancer 126 and prevent numerous other cancers, large state differences in coverage will likely widen existing disparities. Notably, states with the highest cervical cancer incidence rates have the lowest vaccination coverage. In 2023, up‐to‐date HPV vaccination among boys and girls aged 13–17 years ranged from 38% in Mississippi and 40% in Georgia to 78% in North Dakota, 82% in Massachusetts, and 84% in Rhode Island. 124

Cancer in children and adolescents

Cancer is the second most common cause of death among children aged 1–14 years (after accidents) and the fourth most common cause of death among adolescents (aged 15–19 years). In 2026, an estimated 9680 children (aged birth to 14 years) and 5660 adolescents (aged 15–19 years) will be diagnosed with cancer, and 1090 and 730, respectively, will die from the disease. Before age 20 years, an estimated one in 266 children and adolescents will be diagnosed with cancer and one in 2359 will die from the disease.

Leukemia is the most common childhood cancer, accounting for 28% of cases, followed closely by central nervous system tumors (27%), one third of which are benign or borderline malignant brain tumors (Table 14). Cancer types and their distribution differ in adolescents, among whom the most common cancer is central nervous system tumors (22%), two thirds of which are benign or borderline malignant brain tumors, followed by lymphoma (19%) and leukemia (13%). Hodgkin lymphoma is much more common than non‐Hodgkin lymphoma among adolescents, whereas the reverse is true among children. Thyroid carcinoma accounts for 12% of cancers in adolescents but only 2% in children.

TABLE 14.

Incidence rates, case distribution, and 5‐year relative survival by age and international classification of childhood cancer type, ages birth to 19 years, United States.

Birth to 14 years 15‐19 years
Rate per million Distribution % (including benign brain) Distribution % (malignant only) Survival, % Rate per million Distribution % (including benign brain) Distribution % (malignant only) Survival, %
All ICCC groups combined 184.1 100 279.3 100
Malignant only 166.4 91 100 85 238.0 85 100 88
Leukemias, myeloproliferative & myelodysplastic diseases 51.7 28 31 89 35.4 13 15 78
Lymphoid leukemia 40.7 22 24 92 19.0 7 8 77
Acute myeloid leukemia 7.4 4 4 70 9.1 3 4 70
Lymphomas and reticuloendothelial neoplasms 20.6 11 13 95 51.9 19 22 95
Hodgkin lymphoma 5.5 3 3 99 31.5 11 13 98
Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma a 11.0 6 7 91 18.7 7 8 90
Central nervous system neoplasms 49.1 27 62.4 22
Malignant tumors 31.9 17 19 74 21.4 8 9 78
Benign/borderline malignant tumors 17.2 9 98 41.0 14 98
Neuroblastoma & other peripheral nervous cell tumors 11.7 6 7 83 1.3 <1 1 89
Retinoblasoma 4.0 2 2 96 b b b c
Nephroblastoma & other nonepithelial renal tumors 8.1 4 5 93 0.3 <1 <1 c
Hepatic tumors 3.6 2 2 79 1.5 1 1 53 d
Hepatoblastoma 3.1 2 2 82 0.1 <1 <1 c
Malignant bone tumors 7.4 4 4 73 15.0 5 6 68
Osteosarcoma 4.2 2 3 66 8.4 3 3 62
Ewing tumor & related bone sarcomas 2.5 1 1 80 4.4 2 2 68
Rhabdomyosarcoma 5.0 3 3 67 3.7 1 2 52
Germ cell & gonadal tumors 5.5 3 3 94 27.3 10 11 95
Thyroid carcinoma 3.3 2 2 >99 32.1 12 14 >99
Malignant melanoma 1.5 1 1 94 7.5 3 3 98

Note: Incidence rates are per 1,000,000 persons, based on diagnoses during 2018–2022, and age‐adjusted to the US standard population. Survival is based on cases diagnosed during 2015–2021, followed through 2022. Benign and borderline brain tumors were included in central nervous system tumor incidence rates.

Abbreviation: ICCC, International Classification of Childhood Cancer.

a

Includes Burkitt lymphoma.

b

Statistic could not be calculated because of fewer than six cases during 2018–2022.

c

Statistic could not be calculated because of fewer than 25 cases during 2015–2021.

d

The standard error is between 5 and 10 percentage points.

The overall invasive cancer incidence rate in children declined by 0.6% per year from 2015 through 2022, despite a 0.6% annual increase in both major leukemia types and stable lymphoma incidence. The decrease was driven by a decline of greater than 1% per year in malignant brain tumors, which account for about one in five invasive cancers in children (Table 14). Overall cancer incidence in adolescents continued a 0.9% per year increase because of a steeper increase in lymphoid leukemia compared with children, as well as an increase of about 1% per year for both Hodgkin and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. Malignant brain cancer also decreased in adolescents but was not statistically significant and only accounts for about one in 10 invasive cancers in this age group (Table 14). Thyroid cancer incidence rates in adolescents appear to have stabilized since 2018, after an increasing trend of greater than 4% per year since at least 1998.

In contrast to incidence, cancer mortality has declined by more than two thirds in children, from six per 100,000 in 1970 to two per 100,000 in 2023, and by more than one half in adolescents, from seven to three per 100,000, although rates appear to have stabilized in recent years. Much of this progress reflects reductions in death because of improved survival for leukemia through the optimization of established chemotherapeutic regimens. 127 In the mid‐1970s, only 50% of children were alive 5 years after a leukemia diagnosis compared with 89% during 2015–2021, with even greater strides for adolescents, from 24% to 78%. Nevertheless, progress among adolescents has lagged behind that in children for some cancers, in part because of differences in tumor biology, clinical trial enrollment, treatment protocols, and tolerance and adherence to treatment. 128 For example, survival is higher in children than in adolescents for lymphoid leukemia (92% vs. 77%), Ewing sarcoma (80% vs. 68%), hepatic tumors (79% vs. 53%), and rhabdomyosarcoma (67% vs. 52%; Table 14). Survival rates are lowest in both children and adolescents for osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and some rare cancers, such as diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Long‐term survivors of childhood cancer are at substantially elevated risk of treatment‐related adverse health effects as they age. One longitudinal cohort study found that nearly one in six childhood cancer survivors experienced a major cardiovascular event by age 50 years compared with fewer than 1% of community controls. 129 A recent analysis indicated a three‐fold excess overall mortality risk among 7500 childhood cancer survivors aged 50 years or older compared with the general population, predominantly because of subsequent cancer among those originally treated with radiation therapy. 130 Radiation exposure appears to exacerbate, but not fully explain, excess risk of an earlier onset for age‐related diseases among childhood cancer survivors. 131 These studies underscore the need for survivorship care plans for children and adolescents and attention to medical history for older adults to facilitate cancer surveillance and inform prevention and early detection strategies.

Limitations

The projected numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in 2026 are rigorously calculated based on high‐quality, population‐based cancer registry data and the underlying cause of death reported on death certificates and provide a valid estimate of the contemporary cancer burden. However, these are model‐based estimates that should not be used to track temporal cancer trends for several reasons. First, the methodology changes over time, most recently in 2021, 23 , 24 to take advantage of improved modeling techniques and cancer surveillance coverage. Second, although the models are robust, they can only account for trends through the most recent data year (currently, 2022 for incidence and 2023 for mortality) and cannot accommodate abrupt fluctuations caused by changes in detection practices, such as those that occur for prostate cancer because of changes in PSA testing. Third, the model can be oversensitive to sudden or steep changes in observed data. The most informative metrics for tracking cancer trends are age‐standardized or age‐specific cancer incidence rates from SEER, the NPCR, and/or the NAACCR and cancer death rates from the NCHS.

Errors in reporting race and ethnicity in medical records and on death certificates result in underestimated cancer incidence and mortality in persons who are not White, particularly Native American populations. Although racial misclassification for cancer incidence is reduced by confining cases to those diagnosed in residents of Purchased/Referred Care Delivery Area counties, which are associated with the Indian Health Service, these data exclude one third of the Native American population who reside in urban areas. Although mortality data cover the complete Native American population, racial misclassification is mitigated using factors developed by the NCHS for all cancers combined and may overestimate or underestimate rates for individual cancer types. 17 Cancer data for other groups that have been historically marginalized in the United States are mostly limited to the broadly defined racial and ethnic categories developed by the Office of Management and Budget and mask important heterogeneity within these populations. Finally, the lack of sexual orientation and gender identity data collection precludes analysis of cancer occurrence in the LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, transgender, and queer or questioning) population, which undoubtedly would inform targeted cancer control efforts given the high prevalence of smoking in this group. 132

CONCLUSION

Cancer mortality continued to decline in the United States through 2023, resulting in 4.8 million deaths averted since 1991 because of reductions in smoking, earlier detection for some cancers, and improved treatment. These interventions have also contributed to a milestone 70% 5‐year survival rate for all cancers combined, including remarkable gains over the past 2 decades for many high‐mortality and advanced cancers. Lung cancer has had among the most notable improvements in survival yet remains the leading cancer‐related death, causing more than twice as many deaths as any other cancer. Among AIAN people, who have the highest lung cancer rates, incidence has yet to decline in women, underscoring the need to redouble culturally sensitive, targeted tobacco‐control efforts. Although decades of scientific investment have translated into longer lives for most people diagnosed with cancer, pending federal cuts to health insurance and cancer research will inevitably reduce access to life‐saving drugs and halt progress at a time when incidence is rising for many common cancers.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors disclosed no conflicts of interest. Rebecca L. Siegel, Tyler B. Kratzer, Nikita Sandeep Wagle, Hyuna Sung, and Ahmedin Jemal are employed by the American Cancer Society, which receives grants from private and corporate foundations, including foundations associated with companies in the health sector, for research outside of the submitted work. The authors are not funded by or key personnel for any of these grants, and their salary is solely funded through American Cancer Society funds.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge all cancer registry staff in the United States for their hard work and diligence in collecting cancer information, without which none of this research could have been accomplished.

Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Wagle NS, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2026. CA Cancer J Clin. 2026;e70043. doi: 10.3322/caac.70043

REFERENCES

  • 1. van den Puttelaar R, Lansdorp‐Vogelaar I, Hahn AI, et al. Impact and recovery from COVID‐19–related disruptions in colorectal cancer screening and care in the US: a scenario analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023;32(1):22‐29. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-22-0544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Star J, Bandi P, Nargis N, et al. Updated review of major cancer risk factors and screening test use in the United States, with a focus on changes during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023;32(7):879‐888. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Richman I, Tessier‐Sherman B, Galusha D, Oladele CR, Wang K. Breast cancer screening during the COVID‐19 pandemic: moving from disparities to health equity. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;115(2):139‐145. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: Incidence‐SEER Research Data, 8 Registries, November 2023 Submission (1975–2022)‐Linked To County Attributes‐Time Dependent (1990–2023) Income/Rurality, 1969–2023 Counties, released April 2025, based on the November 2024 submission. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: Incidence‐SEER Research Data, 9 Registries (1975–2018), released April 2021, based on the November 2020 submission. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: Incidence‐SEER Research Limited‐Field Data, 21 Registries, November 2024 Submission (2000–2022)‐Linked To County Attributes‐Time Dependent (1990–2023) Income/Rurality, 1969–2023 Counties, released April 2025, based on the November 2024 submission. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) Incidence Data‐Cancer in North America Research Data, 1998–2022, Delay Adjusted Factors‐American Cancer Society Facts and Figures (which includes data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries, the Canadian Cancer Registry's Provincial and Territorial Registries, and the National Cancer Institute's SEER Registries), certified by the NAACCR as meeting high‐quality incidence data standards for the specified time periods, submitted December 2024. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) Incidence Data‐Cancer in North America Research Data, 1995–2022, Standard File, American Cancer Society Facts and Figures (which includes data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries, the Canadian Cancer Registry's Provincial and Territorial Registries, and the National Cancer Institute's SEER Registries), certified by the NAACCR as meeting high‐quality incidence data standards for the specified time periods, submitted December 2024. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: Mortality‐All Causes of Death. Total U.S. (1969–2023) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment>, Linked To County Attributes‐Total U.S., 1969–2023 Counties (underlying mortality data provided by the National Center for Health Statistics), released February 2025. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wingo PA, Cardinez CJ, Landis SH, et al. Long‐term trends in cancer mortality in the United States, 1930–1998. Cancer. 2003;97(12 suppl):3133‐3275. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Xu J, Heron M. Deaths: final data for 2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;63(9):1‐117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Steliarova‐Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition. Cancer. 2005;103(7):1457‐1467. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al., eds. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 3rd ed. World Health Organization; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Steliarova‐Foucher E, Colombet M, Ries LAG, et al. International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001–10: a population‐based registry study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(6):719‐731. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30186-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. World Health Organization . International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision. Volumes I–III. World Health Organization; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mariotto AB, Feuer EJ, Howlader N, Chen H‐S, Negoita S, Cronin KA. Interpreting cancer incidence trends: challenges due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023;115(9):1109‐1111. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Arias E, Xu J, Curtin S, Bastian B, Tejada‐Vera B. Mortality profile of the non‐Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native population, 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021;70(12):1‐27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Clegg LX, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN, Fay MP, Hankey BF. Impact of reporting delay and reporting error on cancer incidence rates and trends. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(20):1537‐1545. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. CDC; 2018. Accessed September 27, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_tools.htm [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mariotto AB, Zou Z, Johnson CJ, Scoppa S, Weir HK, Huang B. Geographical, racial and socio‐economic variation in life expectancy in the US and their impact on cancer relative survival. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0201034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mariotto AB, Noone AM, Howlader N, et al. Cancer survival: an overview of measures, uses, and interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014;2014(49):145‐186. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Cho H, Howlader N, Mariotto AB, Cronin KA. Estimating relative survival for cancer patients from the SEER program using expected rates based on Ederer I versus Ederer II method. Surveillance Research Program, NCI, Technical Report #2011‐01. 2021; Accessed September 24, 2025. https://surveillance.cancer.gov/reports/tech2011.01.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Liu B, Zhu L, Zou J, et al. Updated methodology for projecting U.S.‐ and state‐level cancer counts for the current calendar year: part I: spatio‐temporal modeling for cancer incidence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(9):1620‐1626. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Liu B, et al. Updated methodology for projecting U.S.‐ and state‐level cancer counts for the current calendar year: part II: evaluation of incidence and mortality projection methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(11):1993‐2000. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pickle LW, Hao Y, Jemal A, et al. A new method of estimating United States and state‐level cancer incidence counts for the current calendar year. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):30‐42. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Islami F, Marlow EC, Thomson B, et al. Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(5):405‐432. doi: 10.3322/caac.21858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bandi P, Star J, Mazzitelli N, et al. Prevalence and review of major modifiable cancer risk factors, HPV vaccination, and cancer screenings in the United States: 2025 Update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025;34(6):836‐849. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Negoita S, Chen HS, Sanchez PV, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part 2: early assessment of the COVID‐19 pandemic's impact on cancer diagnosis. Cancer. 2024;130(1):117‐127. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Burus T, Lei F, Huang B, et al. COVID‐19 and rates of cancer diagnosis in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(9):e2432288. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Howlader N, Chen HS, Noone AM, et al. Impact of COVID‐19 on 2021 cancer incidence rates and potential rebound from 2020 decline. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024;117(3):507‐510. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertsen PC, Kramer BS. The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA. 1995;273(7):548‐552. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520310046028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Choi YJ, Lee DH, Han KD, et al. Adult height in relation to risk of cancer in a cohort of 22,809,722 Korean adults. Br J Cancer. 2019;120(6):668‐674. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0371-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Green J, Cairns BJ, Casabonne D, Wright FL, Reeves G, Beral V. Height and cancer incidence in the Million Women Study: prospective cohort, and meta‐analysis of prospective studies of height and total cancer risk. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(8):785‐794. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70154-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(10):626‐638. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Jackson SS, Marks MA, Katki HA, et al. Sex disparities in the incidence of 21 cancer types: quantification of the contribution of risk factors. Cancer. 2022;128(19):3531‐3540. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Jemal A, Fedewa SA, Ma J, et al. Prostate cancer incidence and PSA testing patterns in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations. JAMA. 2015;314(19):2054‐2061. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.14905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):120‐134. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kratzer TB, Mazzitelli N, Star J, Dahut WL, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Prostate cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. Published online September 2, 2025. doi: 10.3322/caac.70028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Qian Z, Chen YJ, Feldman J, et al. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging utilization and its relationship with advanced prostate cancer detection. Urol Oncol. 2024;42(11):370.e1‐370.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. US Preventive Services Task Force ; Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;319(18):1901‐1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wolf AMD, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(2):70‐98. doi: 10.3322/caac.20066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Unger JM, Till C, Tangen CM, et al. Long‐Term adverse effects and complications after prostate cancer treatment. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(12):1654‐1662. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.4397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Vertosick EA, Vickers A, Dahlin A, et al. Prostate‐specific antigen levels at age 60 and lifetime risk of lethal prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. Published online September 19, 2025. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Newman LA, et al. Breast cancer statistics 2024. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024;74(6):477‐495. doi: 10.3322/caac.21863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Pfeiffer RM, Webb‐Vargas Y, Wheeler W, Gail MH. Proportion of U.S. trends in breast cancer incidence attributable to long‐term changes in risk factor distributions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27(10):1214‐1222. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group ; Schoemaker MJ, Nichols HB, et al. Association of body mass index and age with subsequent breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(11):e181771. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. U.S. Census Bureau . Current Population Survey, June 1976–2024. Technical Documentation: Methodology (for information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions). Accessed September 24, 2025. http://www.census.gov/programs‐surveys/cps/technical‐documentation/methodology.html
  • 48. Allen NE, Beral V, Casabonne D, et al. Moderate alcohol intake and cancer incidence in women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(5):296‐305. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Keyes KM, Jager J, Mal‐Sarkar T, Patrick ME, Rutherford C, Hasin D. Is there a recent epidemic of women's drinking? A critical review of national studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(7):1344‐1359. doi: 10.1111/acer.14082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. McKetta SC, Keyes KM. Trends in U.S. women's binge drinking in middle adulthood by socioeconomic status, 2006–2018. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;212:108026. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Adams RS, McKetta SC, Jager J, Stewart MT, Keyes KM. Cohort effects of women's mid‐life binge drinking and alcohol use disorder symptoms in the United States: impacts of changes in timing of parenthood. Addiction. 2023;118(10):1932‐1941. doi: 10.1111/add.16262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wu AH, Wu J, Tseng C, et al. Air pollution and breast cancer incidence in the Multiethnic Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(3):273‐284. doi: 10.1200/jco.24.00418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Harvey SV, Wentzensen N. Hysterectomy‐corrected uterine corpus cancer incidence trends and differences in relative survival reveal racial disparities and rising rates of nonendometrioid cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(22):1895‐1908. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Harris JE. Cigarette smoking among successive birth cohorts of men and women in the United States during 1900–80. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983;71(3):473‐479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Jemal A, Miller KD, Ma J, et al. Higher lung cancer incidence in young women than young men in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(21):1999‐2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kratzer TB, Bandi P, Freedman ND, et al. Lung cancer statistics, 2023. Cancer. 2024;130(8):1330‐1348. 10.1002/cncr.35128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Arrazola RA, Griffin T, Lunsford NB, et al. US cigarette smoking disparities by race and ethnicity—keep going and going! Prev Chronic Dis. 2023;20:E45. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Caturegli G, Zhu X, Palis B, Mullett TW, Resio BJ, Boffa DJ. Smoking status of the US cancer population and a new perspective from the National Cancer Database. JAMA Oncol. 2025;11(5):564‐566. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Star J, Han X, Smith RA, Schafer EJ, Jemal A, Bandi P. Cancer screening 3 years after the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic. JAMA. 2025;333(17):1543‐1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.0902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Schafer EJ, Sung H, Star J, Bandi P, Smith RA, Siegel RL. Colorectal cancer incidence in US adults after recommendations for earlier screening. JAMA. 2025;334(9):824‐826. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.9147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Zhang X, El‐Serag HB, Thrift AP. Sex and race disparities in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States examined through age–period–cohort analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29(1):88‐94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-19-1052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Croswell JM, Ransohoff DF, Kramer BS. Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues. Semin Oncol. 2010;37(3):202‐215. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. O'Grady TJ, Gates MA, Boscoe FP. Thyroid cancer incidence attributable to overdiagnosis in the United States 1981–2011. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(11):2664‐2673. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(10):1335‐1342. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Pasaoglu E, Dursun N, Ozyalvacli G, Hacihasanoglu E, Behzatoglu K, Calay O. Comparison of World Health Organization 2000/2004 and World Health Organization 2010 classifications for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2015;19(2):81‐87. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):24‐35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (https://seer.cancer.gov/). SEER*Stat Database: Incidence‐SEER Research Limited‐Field Data with Delay‐Adjustment, 21 Registries, Malignant Only, released April 2025, based on the November 2024 Submission (2000–2022). National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: Incidence‐SEER Research Data, 9 Registries, released April 2025, based on the November 2020 submission (1975–2018). National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program; 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Sasaki K, Strom SS, O'Brien S, et al. Relative survival in patients with chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukaemia in the tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor era: analysis of patient data from six prospective clinical trials. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2(5):e186‐e193. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00048-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Moris D, Martinino A, Schiltz S, et al. Advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview of the current and evolving therapeutic landscape for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin. Published online May 20, 2025. doi: 10.3322/caac.70018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Singal AG, Salem R, Pinato DJ, Pillai A. Advances in locoregional and systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gas-troenterology. 2025;169(4):585‐599. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.03.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Brown ZJ, Tsilimigras DI, Ruff SM, et al. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(4):410‐420. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.7989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Abou‐Alfa GK, Lau G, Kudo M, et al. Tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(8):EVIDoa2100070. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894‐1905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first‐line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non‐inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1163‐1173. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30207-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Calvo V. Redefining lung cancer therapy—a long‐awaited shift in strategy. N Engl J Med. 2025;393(8):809‐810. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2507130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Leal TA, Ramalingam SS. Commemorating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung cancer: translational research at its best. Cancer. 2024;130(11):1910‐1912. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Howlader N, Forjaz G, Mooradian MJ, et al. The effect of advances in lung‐cancer treatment on population mortality. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(7):640‐649. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Curti BD, Faries MB. Recent advances in the treatment of melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(23):2229‐2240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2034861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Loree JM, Kopetz S. Recent developments in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017;9(8):551‐564. doi: 10.1177/1758834017714997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Shah MP, Wenger NS, Glaspy J, et al. Patient‐reported discordance between care goals and treatment intent in advanced cancer. Cancer. 2025;131(17):e35976. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Welch HG, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Are increasing 5‐year survival rates evidence of success against cancer? JAMA. 2000;283(22):2975‐2978. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.22.2975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Shiels MS, Freedman ND, Haque AT, et al. US cancer deaths prevented due to survival improvements stratified by extent of disease, 2010–2019. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025;117(10):2089‐2095. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Shiels MS, Graubard BI, McNeel TS, Kahle L, Freedman ND. Trends in smoking‐attributable and smoking‐unrelated lung cancer death rates in the United States, 1991–2018. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024;116(5):711‐716. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Howlader N, Cronin KA, Yu M, Miller D, Lowy DR. Urban‐rural disparities in lung cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Black and White populations. Cancer. 2025;131(15):e70004. doi: 10.1002/cncr.70004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, et al. Reduced lung‐cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(6):503‐513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS. The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer. 2013;119(22):3976‐3983. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Henschke CI, Yip R, Shaham D, et al. A 20‐year follow‐up of the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I‐ELCAP). Radiology. 2023;309(2):e231988. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Bandi P, Star J, Ashad‐Bishop K, Kratzer T, Smith R, Jemal A. Lung cancer screening in the US, 2022. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(8):882‐891. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Dasari A, Wallace K, Halperin DM, et al. Epidemiology of neuroendocrine neoplasms in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(6):e2515798. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Caswell‐Jin JL, Sun LP, Munoz D, et al. Analysis of breast cancer mortality in the US—1975 to 2019. JAMA. 2024;331(3):233‐241. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.25881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Etzioni R, Tsodikov A, Mariotto A, et al. Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(2):175‐181. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9083-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Tsodikov A, Gulati R, Heijnsdijk EAM, et al. Reconciling the effects of screening on prostate cancer mortality in the ERSPC and PLCO trials. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(7):449‐455. doi: 10.7326/M16-2586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts & Figures for Asian American, Native Hawaiian, & other Pacific Islander People 2024. American Cancer Society; 2024. Accessed September 24, 2025. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer‐facts‐statistics/acs‐aanhpi‐cancer‐facts‐figures‐2024.html
  • 95. Vo JB, Bess JL, Taparra K, et al. Leading causes of death among Asian American compared with Pacific Islander individuals. JAMA Intern Med. 2025;185(3):335‐338. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Moss JL, Pinto CN, Srinivasan S, Cronin KA, Croyle RT. Enduring cancer disparities by persistent poverty, rurality, and race: 1990–1992 to 2014–2018. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(6):829‐836. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Jemal A, Robbins AS, Lin CC, et al. Factors that contributed to Black–White disparities in survival among nonelderly women with breast cancer between 2004 and 2013. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(1):14‐24. doi: 10.1200/jco.2017.73.7932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Xu X, Chen L, Nunez‐Smith M, Clark M, Wright JD. Racial disparities in diagnostic evaluation of uterine cancer among Medicaid beneficiaries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023;115(6):636‐643. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Ganguly AP, Baker KK, Redman MW, McClintock AH, Yung RL. Racial disparities in the screening mammography continuum within a heterogeneous health care system. Cancer. 2023;129(S19):3171‐3181. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Lawson MB, Bissell MCS, Miglioretti DL, et al. Multilevel factors associated with time to biopsy after abnormal screening mammography results by race and ethnicity. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(8):1115‐1126. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Alagoz O, May FP, Doubeni CA, et al. Impact of racial disparities in follow‐up and quality of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024;116(11):1807‐1816. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Baeker Bispo J, Bandi P, Jemal A, Islami F. Receipt of clinician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening among underscreened U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(9):1985‐1987. doi: 10.7326/m23-1341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Kurian AW, Abrahamse P, Furgal A, et al. Germline genetic testing after cancer diagnosis. JAMA. 2023;330(1):43‐51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Oyer RA, Hurley P, Boehmer L, et al. Increasing racial and ethnic diversity in cancer clinical trials: an American Society of Clinical Oncology and Association of Community Cancer Centers joint research statement. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(19):2163‐2171. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agenor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1453‐1463. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Karvonen KA, Vu A, Lin K, et al. Historical redlining and mortality in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer in California, 2000–2019. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025;117(8):1646‐1654. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Beyer KMM, Zhou Y, Laud PW, et al. Mortgage lending bias and breast cancer survival among older women in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(25):2749‐2757. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Bikomeye JC, Zhou Y, McGinley EL, et al. Historical redlining and breast cancer treatment and survival among older women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023;115(6):652‐661. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Collin LJ, Gaglioti AH, Beyer KMM, et al. Neighborhood‐level redlining and lending bias are associated with breast cancer mortality in a large and diverse metropolitan area. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;30(1):53‐60. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Krieger N, Wright E, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Huntley ER, Arcaya M. Cancer stage at diagnosis, historical redlining, and current neighborhood characteristics: breast, cervical, lung, and colorectal cancers, Massachusetts, 2001–2015. Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189(10):1065‐1075. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Lynch EE, Malcoe LH, Laurent SE, Richardson J, Mitchell BC, Meier HCS. The legacy of structural racism: associations between historic redlining, current mortgage lending, and health. SSM Popul Health. 2021;14:100793. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(2):78‐93. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Bach PB, Schrag D, Brawley OW, Galaznik A, Yakren S, Begg CB. Survival of Blacks and Whites after a cancer diagnosis. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2106‐2113. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Lee JG, Henriksen L, Rose SW, Moreland‐Russell S, Ribisl KM. A systematic review of neighborhood disparities in point‐of‐sale tobacco marketing. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(9):e8‐e18. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2015.302777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Bobbitt JR, Liu F, Keri RA, Cullen J. Cancer burden in neighborhoods with greater racial diversity and environmental burden. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(6):e2516740. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Madrigal JM, Flory A, Fisher JA, et al. Sociodemographic inequities in the burden of carcinogenic industrial air emissions in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024;116(5):737‐744. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Brady D, Kohler U, Zheng H. Novel estimates of mortality associated with poverty in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(6):618‐619. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Singh GK, Jemal A. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival in the United States, 1950–2014: over six decades of changing patterns and widening inequalities. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:2819372. doi: 10.1155/2017/2819372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Islami F, Guerra CE, Minihan A, et al. American Cancer Society's report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(2):112‐143. doi: 10.3322/caac.21703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Boyle J, Yau J, Slade JL, et al. Neighborhood disadvantage and prostate tumor aggressiveness among African American and European American men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024;33(10):1318‐1326. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Goel N, Hernandez A, Cole SW. Social genomic determinants of health: understanding the molecular pathways by which neighborhood disadvantage affects cancer outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(30):3618‐3627. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Nguyen BT, Han X, Jemal A, Drope J. Diet quality, risk factors and access to care among low‐income uninsured American adults in states expanding Medicaid vs. states not expanding under the affordable care act. Prev Med. 2016;91:169‐171. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Sommers BD, Gawande AA, Baicker K. Health insurance coverage and health—what the recent evidence tells us. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):586‐593. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1706645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. American Cancer Society . Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2025–2026. American Cancer Society; 2025. Accessed September 24, 2025. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/cancer-prevention-and-early-detection-facts-and-figures/2025-cped-files/cped-cff-2025-2026.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 125. American Cancer Society . Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures, Tables & Figures 2024. American Cancer Society; 2024. Accessed September 24, 2025. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer‐org/research/cancer‐facts‐and‐statistics/cancer‐prevention‐and‐early‐detection‐facts‐and‐figures/2024‐cped‐files/cped‐2024‐cff‐tables‐and‐figures.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Falcaro M, Castañon A, Ndlela B, et al. The effects of the national HPV vaccination programme in England, UK, on cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia incidence: a register‐based observational study. Lancet. 2021;398(10316):2084‐2092. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02178-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Kantarjian HM, Keating MJ, Freireich EJ. Toward the potential cure of leukemias in the next decade. Cancer. 2018;124(22):4301‐4313. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Barr RD, Ferrari A, Ries L, Whelan J, Bleyer WA. Cancer in adolescents and young adults: a narrative review of the current status and a view of the future. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(5):495‐501. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Hammoud RA, Liu Q, Dixon SB, et al. The burden of cardiovascular disease and risk for subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events in survivors of childhood cancer: a prospective, longitudinal analysis from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(6):811‐822. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00157-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Bhandari R, Chen Y, Chow EJ, et al. Health outcomes beyond age 50 years in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(27):2998‐3010. doi: 10.1200/jco-25-00385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Yeh JM, Ward ZJ, Stratton KL, et al. Accelerated aging in survivors of childhood cancer—early onset and excess risk of chronic conditions. JAMA Oncol. 2025;11(5):535‐543. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Kratzer TB, Star J, Minihan AK, et al. Cancer in people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or gender‐nonconforming. Cancer. 2024;130(17):2948‐2967. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Ca are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES