Skip to main content
PLOS Mental Health logoLink to PLOS Mental Health
. 2025 Sep 12;2(9):e0000420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000420

Determinants of early mental health help-seeking among women in Bangladesh: A nationally representative bootstrapped regression analysis

Tanvir Ahmed 1,*, Salma Tasnim Luthfa 2,, Amatul Haque Chaahat 3,, Masudur Rahman Kanchon 4, Azaz Bin Sharif 5
Editor: Lambert Zixin Li6
PMCID: PMC12798417  PMID: 41662058

Abstract

Mental health is a critical public health concern, shaping emotional, psychological, and social well-being. Depression and anxiety are the most common and preventable mental disorders, can be significantly improved by early interventions and proper care. This study investigates help-seeking behavior at early stage (mild to moderate anxiety and depression) and its determinants among Bangladeshi women. Special focus is given to media exposure as a potential enabler of early support. We used Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) data 2022 and utilized bootstrapped fixed-effect logistic regression model to detect the determinants. Only 20.8% of the women in this study (Weighted N = 3181) reported seeking help at least once. Compared to women with no education, those with secondary or higher education were respectively 1.41 and 1.55 times more likely to seek help (95% CI = 1.07 – 1.87 and 1.04 – 2.28 respectively)). In reference to Barisal, residents of Khulna (aOR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.70-4.65) showed the highest increase in help-seeking odds. Working women had significantly greater odds of seeking help (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.52–3.07). Internet users were twice as likely to seek help (95% CI: 1.52–2.75), while smartphone users showed lower odds (aOR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46–0.88). Watching Television showed no significant (aOR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.88, 1.36) impact on help-seeking behaviour. There are alarmingly low levels of help-seeking among Bangladeshi women facing early-stage anxiety and depression, with housewives being the least likely to seek support. Education, employment, decision making autonomy, and internet usage significantly influenced help-seeking behavior. Despite widespread access, television remains a neglected tool in mental health promotion. An integrated, culturally sensitive strategy with combination of mass media, peer support, equitable responsibilities, education, and policy have the potential to empower women and spark early help-seeking for mental health.

Introduction

Mental health encompasses emotional, psychological, and social well-being, influencing thought processes, emotions, behaviors, stress management, relationships, and decision-making. Recognizing its significance, the World Health Organization (WHO) has prioritized mental health for accelerated action in its Thirteenth General Programme of Work (GPW13) [1]. Depression and anxiety are the most common mental disorders. Both are treatable, and in many cases, preventable. Early intervention, proper care, and support can significantly improve outcomes and enhance overall well-being [2,3]. Slowing down the progression of or averting these disorders at early stage can help reduce the overall mental health disease burden, and facilitate an effective & complete recovery and reduce the economic costs linked to anxiety & depressive disorders [46]. In Bangladesh, approximately 18.7% of adults and 12.6% of children experience mental health disorders, with depression, anxiety, and stress being the most prevalent [8,9]. The situation assessment report by WHO special initiative of mental health estimated that 92.3% of adults with mental disorders nationwide do not receive any treatment [7]. Bangladesh’s mental healthcare system remains critically inadequate due to a shortage of public facilities, limited skilled professionals, insufficient funding, weak policy implementation, and the influence of stigma and cultural beliefs [9,14]. For many individuals, particularly those in rural areas, reaching a tertiary facility is not only financially burdensome but also logistically impractical. By the time individuals seek help at tertiary centers, their conditions are often severe, requiring extensive interventions that could have been avoided with earlier support [7,10].

Culture influences anxiety & depressive symptoms, awareness, and care-seeking, with more somatic symptoms reported in non-Western countries [11,12]. Studies found higher somatic symptoms among South Asians than Caucasians leading to recognize that sociocultural factors interact with risk factors, shaping anxiety and depression’s manifestation [11,13]. Women are disproportionately affected due to a combination of biological, hormonal, social, and cultural factors, a disparity that is particularly pronounced in LMICs [1417]. In Bangladesh, Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression are largely unrecognized, suggesting potential underreporting due to unfamiliar terminology [11]. The underestimation have serious consequences, leading to low prioritization of women’s mental health in family health planning and inadequate interventions [18,19].

In Bangladesh, television programs such as Meena Cartoon [20,21], along with public service advertisements addressing the dangers of smoking, substance abuse, tuberculosis, and HIV, have already demonstrated success in driving significant social transformation. These types of initiatives have effectively raised awareness, shifted attitudes, and promoted healthier behaviors across diverse populations not only in Bangladesh but also in other LMICs as well [2228]. Popular formats like dramas, cartoons, music videos, and live shows have successfully driven behavior change in various health domains [29,30]. As of 2025, our desk review revealed that not a single dedicated mainstream TV program, advertisement, or campaign in state-owned television channel targets mental health awareness, early symptom recognition, or help-seeking behavior, also only 3 of the 40 private television channels broadcast dedicated programs for mental health but views of these programs on Youtube is very low suggesting very poor reach to mass population.

Aims and objectives

As women are at heightened risk of from severe mental health burdens [3134], this study aims to determine the prevalence of the practice of help-seeking behavior among women experiencing mild to moderate Anxiety and Depression in Bangladesh and identify its proximal determinants with special focus on impact of Media Exposure on their help-seeking behavior. The study recognizes that understanding the help-seeking patterns in this demographic is crucial to designing effective mental health interventions specific to women’s needs in the Bangladeshi context. We assessed whether Smartphone, Internet, Newspaper/Magazine, Radio and Television exposure correlate with a greater likelihood of engaging in help-seeking behavior and their nature (positive/negative) of influence on help seeking.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis on data from ‘Individual Recode (BDIR81)’ file from the 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS), which includes comprehensive data on women’s characteristics collected using the women’s questionnaire along with selected household-level variables. We’ve also utilized the GIS file (BDGC81FL) to access location of all 674 clusters. The BDHS utilizes a two-stage stratified probability sampling design for ensuring national representativeness in the sample. At first stage, the country is stratified by administrative divisions and residence type (urban/rural). Then, within each stratum, clusters of households are selected using probability proportional to the size of each stratum, followed by systematic sampling of households within each cluster. Further details on the survey methodology are available on the DHS website [35,36].

Ethical statement

This study is based on a secondary analysis of data obtained from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program. Access to the dataset was granted by DHS after the submission and approval of a formal data request, in full compliance with their data use policies and procedures. The dataset used is fully anonymized and contains no personally identifiable information. Moreover, there exists no mechanism by which individuals can be re-identified from the data. As the analysis involves secondary data that is publicly available upon approved request and does not involve direct interaction with human subjects, this study was exempt from further institutional ethical review. But all ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and guidelines for responsible conduct in secondary data use were upheld throughout the study. We affirm that the data were used exclusively for scholarly purposes as permitted under the DHS data use agreement.

Study population

Individual recode file of BDHS 2022 contains data of ever-married women of reproductive age (15–49 years) in Bangladesh. We have included the women who reported being in early stage of anxiety and depression, had PHQ and GAD score between 5–14 (mild to moderate Depression and anxiety, stages at which active treatment is not commonly recommended, further screening is required for pharmacotherapy [37,38]). Out of 30078 women, 3211 (unweighted) women were selected for our study who met the inclusion criteria. (Fig 1)

Fig 1. Study population inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Fig 1

Study measures

We covered individual characteristics of the participants (Age, Education Level, Occupation, For whom they work for, Marital Status and Religion), Husband/Partner’s characteristics (Education Level, Occupation, Currently residing with wife/partner), Household characteristics (Wealth Index, No. of members in the household, Residence and Division), Media Exposure variables (Smartphone ownership, Internet usage, Frequency of Reading newspaper, listening to radio and watching television) and Decision making authority of the participants about Respondent’s Healthcare as the explanatory variables of outcome measure which is addressed by participant’s one of the dichotomous responses to ‘Ever tried to seek help for the things you experienced’ variable which points towards the experiences mentioned in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires. Survey related variable: Primary Sampling Unit, Stratification used in sample design and Women’s individual sample weight were also kept into the test-ready data set for incorporating survey design into our analysis. Cases having missing responses for outcome variable or many missing responses in explanatory variables were dropped from our study.

Data management & analysis

We used R for Windows (v4.4.1) and RStudio (v2024.09.1 build 394) for data wrangling and analyses, Spatial Distribution was determined using QGis (v3.42 Munster). Sociodemographic variables, media exposure, and women’s decision-making autonomy related variables were recoded and releveled to align our study with existing literature. Weight variable was generated from women’s individual sample weight. Before analysis, survey design was taken into account by utilizing the primary sampling units, stratification used in sample design and weight to ensure correct and generalizable estimation. After incorporating the survey design, we proceeded with the weighted frequency of our final sample which was 3181. A descriptive analysis was done on all the independent and outcome variables. Spatial distribution of cluster-wise proportion of women who sought help at early stage of anxiety and depression were calculated from matching the cluster numbers from Individual Recode file with GIS data.

Association of the categorical independent variables with outcome were detected using Chi-square test of Independence with cluster design effect adjustment assured with Rao-Scott’s adjustment and strength of association of each independent variables was measured by Cramer’s V statistic. Regarding the design of survey and data collection, scope of a hierarchical logistic model was explored but keeping ‘Strata’ as random intercept did not show improvement in variance over the fixed effect model. So, strata is kept as one of the fixed variables in the model. A univariable and two multivariable weighted univariate fixed effect logistic regression model were employed to estimate crude and confounder-adjusted odds ratios. Between two multivariable logistic models, all the explanatory variables were included into full model to adjust for potential confounders. Given the categorical nature of all variables, absence of multicollinearity, and our focus on explanation rather than prediction, we preferred AIC-based ‘Backward’ stepwise elimination method over other regularization methods for variable selection to prevent overfitting of the model. Metrices of the final model are as follows, AIC = 2911, McFadden’s Pseudo R2 = 0.23, Logarithmic Loss = 0.38, PCP = 69.3%. Assumptions of the model were met (S1 Fig) and performance metrices (AUC = 0.67, Accuracy = 0.79, Brier Score = 0.14, F1 Score = 0.88) are suggestive of a good performing model and Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit test (Chi-square = 7.005, df = 8, p = 0.536) also assures a well fitted model. We fitted the model with non-parametric bootstrapped (1000 resamples) datasets for robust estimation of the average point (odds ratios) and interval (2.5th and 97.5th Percentiles of odds ratios) estimates. Bootstrapping involved repeatedly resampling the data to generate more stable and robust confidence intervals. More information about the analysis procedure is provided in the supporting document (S1 File).

Results

This study enrolled a total of 3181 participants (Table 1). The mean age of participants was 33.8 years (SD = 8.8), with the highest proportion (19.1%) in the 35–39 age group. Most participants (42.3%) had secondary education and 60.4% were housewives. Majority of the women resided in rural region (71%). Not all women who owned a smartphone were internet users. In the domain of media exposure, proportion of smartphone users and internet users remained notably low, with less than one-fourth (27% and 24% respectively) women had reported usage. Traditional media engagement was even more limited with less than 5% of women reported listening to the radio or reading newspapers or magazines, a decline likely driven by the rise of digital technologies. However, over half of the women (55%) reported watching television regularly. Only 15.6% women made independent healthcare decisions, while 60.7% decided jointly with others. Only 20.8% of the participants had ever sought help at early stage of symptoms (Fig 2). Prevalence of early help seeking in majority of the clusters fell below 5% (S2 Fig)

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants (n = 3181).

Characteristic n (%)
Age of the Participants
15-19 196 (6.2%)
20-24 352 (11.1%)
25-29 502 (15.8%)
30-34 572 (18.0%)
35-39 608 (19.1%)
40-44 494 (15.5%)
45-49 458 (14.4%)
Education Level of the Participants
No education 593 (18.6%)
Primary 927 (29.1%)
Secondary 1,346 (42.3%)
Higher 315 (9.9%)
Employment Status of the Participant
Unemployed 1,924 (60.5%)
Employed 1,256 (39.5%)
Participants Working for
Housewife 1,923 (60.4%)
Family member 1,080 (33.9%)
Self Employed/For Others 178 (5.6%)
Marital Status of the Participant
Married 2,902 (91.3%)
Widowed, Divorced or Separated 278 (8.7%)
Religion
Islam 2,940 (92.4%)
Hinduism & Others 241 (7.6%)
Age Difference with Husband
0-5 Years 1016 (35%)
6-10 Years 1056 (36.4%)
More than 10 Years 831 (28.6%)
Husband/Partner’s Education Level
No education 889 (27.9%)
Primary 919 (28.9%)
Secondary 980 (30.8%)
Higher 393 (12.4%)
Husband/Partner’s Occupation
Unemployed 144 (4.5%)
Employed 3,036 (95.5%)
Living Arrangement with Wife
Living Together 2,655 (83.5%)
Living elsewhere 526 (16.5%)
Sex of the Household Head
Female 503 (15.8%)
Male 2,677 (84.2%)
Relationship with Household Head
Head Herself 373 (11.7%)
Wife of Head 2,071 (65.1%)
Daughter/Daughter in law/Granddaughter 575 (18.1%)
Mother/Mother-in-Law/Others 161 (5.1%)
Number of Members in Household
Up to 4 1,632 (51.3%)
4+ 1,549 (48.7%)
Wealth Index
Poorest 669 (21.0%)
Middle 652 (20.5%)
Poorer 700 (22.0%)
Richer 630 (19.8%)
Richest 530 (16.7%)
Residence
Rural 2,314 (72.8%)
Urban 866 (27.2%)
Division
Barishal 178 (5.6%)
Chattogram 624 (19.6%)
Dhaka 685 (21.5%)
Khulna 390 (12.3%)
Mymensingh 208 (6.6%)
Rajshahi 437 (13.7%)
Rangpur 488 (15.3%)
Sylhet 171 (5.4%)
Smartphone Usage
Doesn’t have any 1,046 (32.9%)
Not a Smartphone 1,260 (39.6%)
Have a Smartphone 875 (27.5%)
Internet Usage
Never 2,411 (75.8%)
Uses Internet 769 (24.2%)
Frequency of reading Newspaper/Magazine
Not at all 3,000 (94.3%)
Watches sometimes/ regularly 180 (5.7%)
Frequency of listening to Radio
Not at all 3,091 (97.2%)
Watches sometimes/ regularly 90 (2.8%)
Frequency of Watching Television
Not at all 1,433 (45.1%)
Watches sometimes/ regularly 1,747 (54.9%)
Decision Maker of Respondent’s Healthcare
Independently 496 (15.6%)
Jointly 1,929 (60.7%)
Others 756 (23.8%)
Decision Maker of Large Household Purchase
Independently 301 (9.5%)
Jointly 1,925 (60.5%)
Others 955 (30.0%)
Decision Maker of Visiting to Family/Relative
Independently 396 (12.4%)
Jointly 2,053 (64.5%)
Others 732 (23.0%)
Decision Maker of spending Husband/Partner’s Earning
No Earning 53 (1.7%)
Independently 205 (6.5%)
Jointly 2,005 (63.0%)
Others 917 (28.8%)
Ever sought help for the things Participant experienced
Yes 660 (20.8%)
No 2521 (79.2%)

Fig 2. Proportion of the study population who sought help for mild to moderate anxiety and depression.

Fig 2

The results of the chi-square tests (Table 2) showed association between a number of socio-demographic characteristics and help seeking behavior. Employment status & the nature of employment were key factors (p < 0.001). Employed (25.5%) & self-employed (32.0%) individuals were more likely to seek help behavior. Compared to the participants with younger partners (16.8%), those having older partners (25.9%) were found more associated to seek support. Internet users (26.0%) were significantly more likely to seek mental health support than non-users (19.1%). Among divisions, Barishal had the lowest (13.1%) and Khulna had the highest proportion (31.3%) of help seeking women. (Fig 3). Decision-making autonomy in respondent’s healthcare, large household purchase, visit to family or relatives and spending husband/ partner’s earning were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with seeking help for mental health issues where women who are independent decision makers were more likely to seek help for their situation.

Table 2. Association between socio-demographic characteristics & ever sought help for the things they’ve experienced with cramer’s v statistic for significant variables. (n = 3181).

Characteristic No
N = 2,5211
Yes
N = 6601
p-value1
Age of the Participants 0.10
15-19 168 (85.9%) 28 (14.1%)
20-24 288 (81.8%) 64 (18.2%)
25-29 408 (81.3%) 94 (18.7%)
30-34 450 (78.8%) 121 (21.2%)
35-39 474 (77.9%) 135 (22.1%)
40-44 387 (78.3%) 107 (21.7%)
45-49 346 (75.5%) 112 (24.5%)
Education Level of the Participants 0.5
No education 479 (80.9%) 114 (19.1%)
Primary 744 (80.3%) 183 (19.7%)
Secondary 1,054 (78.3%) 292 (21.7%)
Higher
243 (77.1%) 72 (22.9%)
Employment Status of the Participant (Cramer’s V = 0.096) <0.001
Unemployed 1,585 (82.3%) 340 (17.7%)
Employed 936 (74.5%) 321 (25.5%)
Participants Working for (Cramer’s V = 0.105) <0.001
Housewife 1,583 (82.3%) 340 (17.7%)
Family member 816 (75.6%) 264 (24.4%)
Self Employed/For Others 121 (68.0%) 57 (32.0%)
Marital Status of the Participant 0.8
Married 2,298 (79.2%) 604 (20.8%)
Widowed, Divorced or Separated 222 (79.8%) 56 (20.2%)
Religion 0.5
Islam 2,334 (79.4%) 605 (20.6%)
Hinduism & Others 186 (77.2%) 55 (22.8%)
Age Difference with Husband (Cramer’s V = 0.084) <0.001
0-5 Years 845 (83.2%) 171 (16.8%)
6-10 Years 838 (79.4%) 218 (20.6%)
More than 10 Years 615 (74.1%) 215 (25.9%)
Husband/Partner’s Education Level 0.3
No education 721 (81.1%) 168 (18.9%)
Primary 734 (79.9%) 185 (20.1%)
Secondary 766 (78.1%) 214 (21.9%)
Higher 300 (76.3%) 93 (23.7%)
Husband/Partner’s Occupation 0.2
Unemployed 108 (74.5%) 37 (25.5%)
Employed 2,413 (79.5%) 624 (20.5%)
Living Arrangement with Wife (Cramer’s V = 0.029) 0.043
Living Together 2,122 (79.9%) 533 (20.1%)
Living elsewhere 398 (75.7%) 128 (24.3%)
Sex of the Household Head 0.2
Female 386 (76.6%) 118 (23.4%)
Male 2,135 (79.7%) 543 (20.3%)
Relationship with Household Head 0.15
Head Herself 283 (75.8%) 90 (24.2%)
Wife of Head 1,647 (79.6%) 423 (20.4%)
Daughter/Daughter in law/Granddaughter 469 (81.6%) 106 (18.4%)
Mother/Mother-in-Law/Others 121 (74.9%) 41 (25.1%)
Number of Members in Household 0.8
Up to 4 1,289 (79.0%) 343 (21.0%)
4+ 1,231 (79.5%) 318 (20.5%)
Wealth Index 0.4
Poorest 546 (81.7%) 122 (18.3%)
Middle 504 (77.3%) 148 (22.7%)
Poorer 564 (80.5%) 137 (19.5%)
Richer 491 (78.0%) 138 (22.0%)
Richest 415 (78.3%) 115 (21.7%)
Residence 0.15
Rural 1,815 (78.4%) 500 (21.6%)
Urban 706 (81.5%) 161 (18.5%)
Division (Cramer’s V = 0.137) <0.001
Barishal 155 (86.9%) 23 (13.1%)
Chattogram 472 (75.7%) 151 (24.3%)
Dhaka 569 (83.1%) 116 (16.9%)
Khulna 268 (68.7%) 122 (31.3%)
Mymensingh 171 (82.2%) 37 (17.8%)
Rajshahi 342 (78.4%) 94 (21.6%)
Rangpur 402 (82.4%) 86 (17.6%)
Sylhet 141 (82.3%) 30 (17.7%)
Smartphone Usage 0.8
Doesn’t have any 831 (79.5%) 214 (20.5%)
Not a Smartphone 1,003 (79.6%) 257 (20.4%)
Have a Smartphone 685 (78.4%) 189 (21.6%)
Internet Usage (Cramer’s V = 0.084) <0.001
Never 1,951 (80.9%) 460 (19.1%)
Uses Internet 569 (74.0%) 200 (26.0%)
Frequency of reading Newspaper/Magazine 0.058
Not at all 2,390 (79.6%) 611 (20.4%)
Watches sometimes/ regularly 131 (72.4%) 50 (27.6%)
Frequency of listening to Radio 0.2
Not at all 2,454 (79.4%) 637 (20.6%)
Watches sometimes/ regularly 66 (73.7%) 24 (26.3%)
Frequency of Watching Television 0.2
Not at all 1,152 (80.3%) 282 (19.7%)
Watches sometimes/ regularly 1,369 (78.3%) 378 (21.7%)
Decision Maker of Respondent’s Healthcare (Cramer’s V = 0.127) <0.001
Respondent independently 352 (71.1%) 143 (28.9%)
Jointly 1,605 (83.2%) 324 (16.8%)
Others 563 (74.4%) 193 (25.6%)
Decision Maker of Large Household Purchase (Cramer’s V = 0.084) <0.001
Respondent independently 210 (69.9%) 91 (30.1%)
Jointly 1,567 (81.4%) 358 (18.6%)
Others 743 (77.8%) 212 (22.2%)
Decision Maker of Visiting to Family/Relative (Cramer’s V = 0.117) <0.001
Respondent independently 293 (74.0%) 103 (26.0%)
Jointly 1,691 (82.4%) 362 (17.6%)
Others 536 (73.3%) 196 (26.7%)
Decision Maker of spending Husband/Partner’s Earning (Cramer’s V = 0.098) <0.001
Independently 184 (71.1%) 74 (28.7%)
Jointly 1,638 (81.7%) 367 (18.3%)
Others 698 (76.1%) 220 (23.9%)

1 Chi-Square test of Independence with Rao-Scott’s Adjustment for Survey Design.

Fig 3. Divisional distribution of the proportion of women who sought help for mild to moderate anxiety and depression.

Fig 3

Basemap: CartoDB Positron tiles © CARTO (CC BY 4.0), © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL, https://www.openstreetmap.org). Administrative boundary: geoBoundaries dataset (CC BY 4.0, www.geoboundaries.org).

From logistic regression analysis (Table 3), Education level of the participants, their husband/partner’s age, residence and division are found to be significant predictors (Fig 4). Though working status of the participants is not significant, for whom the working for is a significant factor influencing help seeking behavior at early stage of anxiety and depression. Decision-making autonomy and exposure to media showed a mixed association with women’s help-seeking behavior. Greater autonomy in own healthcare decision making and smartphone usage appeared to hinder health-seeking, while in Internet usage is found to facilitate service seeking.

Table 3. Estimates from logistic regression model, of the factors influencing help seeking behavior (n = 3181).

Model Specification Unadjusted
Model1
Full
Model2
Bootstrapped
Model3
Characteristic OR 4,5 95% CI 5 OR 4,5 95% CI 5 OR 4,5 95% CI 5
Age of the Participants
15-19 1.00 1.00
20-24 1.44 0.90, 2.36 1.38 0.83, 2.35
25-29 1.45 0.92, 2.34 1.16 0.67, 2.05
30-34 1.51 0.97, 2.43 1.28 0.71, 2.35
35-39 1.64 * 1.06, 2.62 1.28 0.70, 2.38
40-44 1.68 * 1.08, 2.71 1.00 0.51, 1.95
45-49 1.79 * 1.15, 2.89 1.15 0.58, 2.30
Education Level of the Participants
No education 1.00 1.00 1.00
Primary 1.12 0.86, 1.46 1.11 0.83, 1.50 1.20 0.90, 1.58
Secondary 1.28 * 1.01, 1.64 1.23 0.90, 1.68 1.41 * 1.07, 1.87
Higher 1.48 * 1.07, 2.04 1.24 0.77, 1.99 1.55 * 1.04, 2.28
Employment Status of the Participants
Unemployed 1.00 1.00
Employed 1.60 *** 1.35, 1.90 1.06 0.84, 1.12
For Whom Participants Working
Housewife 1.00 1.00 1.00
For Family member 1.50 *** 1.25, 1.80 1.41 *** 1.21, 1.79 1.47 *** 1.21, 1.79
Self Employed/For Others 2.22 *** 1.59, 3.05 2.08 *** 1.52, 3.07 2.17 *** 1.52, 3.07
Marital Status of the Participants
Married 1.00 1.00
Widowed, Divorced or Separated 0.92 0.67, 1.23 0.84 0.57, 1.22
Religion
Islam 1.00 1.00
Hinduism & Others 0.96 0.69, 1.30 1.04 0.73, 1.44
Age Difference with Husband
0-5 Years 1.00 1.00 1.00
6-10 Years 1.22 0.98, 1.52 1.24 0.98, 1.56 1.28 ** 1.09, 1.61
More than 10 Years 1.51 *** 1.32, 2.25 1.64 *** 1.46, 3.84 1.69 *** 1.34, 2.14
Husband/Partner’s Education Level
No education 1.00 1.00
Higher 1.35 * 1.01, 1.79 1.36 0.91, 2.03
Primary 1.15 0.91, 1.45 1.17 0.90, 1.53
Secondary 1.32 * 1.06, 1.66 1.19 0.89, 1.57
Husband/Partner’s Occupation
Unemployed 1.00 1.00
Employed 0.76 0.52, 1.12 1.22 0.75, 2.06
Living Arrangement with Wife
Living Together 1.00 1.00
Living elsewhere 1.24 0.99, 1.54 1.10 0.77, 1.56
Sex of the Household Head
Female 1.00 1.00
Male 0.84 0.67, 1.06 0.96 0.59, 1.62
Relationship with Household Head
Head Herself 1.00 1.00
Wife of Head 0.83 0.64, 1.08 1.01 0.54, 1.87
Daughter/Daughter in law/Granddaughter 0.76 0.56, 1.04 1.01 0.57, 1.76
Mother/Mother-in-Law/Others 0.91 0.59, 1.39 1.41 0.74, 2.64
Number of Members in Household
Up to 4 1.00 1.00
4+ 0.92 0.77, 1.09 0.94 0.77, 1.15
Wealth Index
Poorest 1.00 1.00
Middle 1.38 * 1.05, 1.82 1.20 0.89, 1.63
Poorer 1.12 0.85, 1.47 0.97 0.73, 1.30
Richer 1.46 ** 1.11, 1.91 1.11 0.80, 1.52
Richest 1.40 * 1.06, 1.86 1.07 0.73, 1.57
Residence
Rural 1.00 1.00 1.00
Urban 1.01 0.84, 1.20 0.73 ** 0.58, 0.92 0.76 * 0.61, 0.94
Division
Barishal 1.00 1.00 1.00
Chattogram 1.73 ** 1.20, 2.52 2.12 ** 1.32, 3.55 2.18 ** 1.36, 3.62
Dhaka 1.15 0.77, 1.72 1.36 0.83, 2.31 1.39 0.86, 2.33
Khulna 2.71 *** 1.89, 3.93 2.66 *** 1.62, 4.50 2.76 *** 1.70, 4.65
Mymensingh 1.19 0.77, 1.84 1.49 0.84, 2.71 1.53 0.86, 2.75
Rajshahi 1.62 * 1.11, 2.39 1.71 * 1.03, 2.91 1.71 * 1.05, 2.90
Rangpur 1.16 0.79, 1.72 1.55 0.94, 2.64 1.58 0.96, 2.67
Sylhet 1.11 0.73, 1.70 1.56 0.84, 2.90 1.55 0.85, 2.85
Smartphone Usage
Doesn’t have any 1.00 1.00 1.00
Not a Smartphone 1.09 0.89, 1.34 0.90 0.72, 1.12 0.94 0.75, 1.17
Have a Smartphone 1.16 0.93, 1.45 0.60 ** 0.42, 0.84 0.64 ** 0.46, 0.88
Internet Usage
Never 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uses Internet 1.58 *** 1.30, 1.91 1.91 *** 1.41, 2.59 2.04 *** 1.52, 2.75
Frequency of reading Newspaper/Magazine
Not at all 1.00 1.00
Watches sometimes/ regularly 1.22 0.87, 1.70 1.20 0.81, 1.74
Frequency of listening to Radio
Not at all 1.00 1.00
Watches sometimes/ regularly 1.48 0.94, 2.26 1.49 0.87, 2.46
Frequency of Watching Television
Not at all 1.00 1.00 1.00
Watches sometimes/ regularly 1.24 * 1.04, 1.47 1.10 0.90, 1.35 1.08 0.88, 1.33
Decision Maker of Respondent’s Healthcare
Independently 1.00 1.00 1.00
Jointly 0.48 *** 0.38, 0.60 0.61 ** 0.44, 0.85 0.61 ** 0.45, 0.83
Others 0.84 0.65, 1.07 0.96 0.69, 1.35 0.87 0.63, 1.20
Decision Maker of Large Household Purchase
Independently 1.00 1.00
Jointly 0.50 *** 0.38, 0.65 0.91 0.59, 1.40
Others 0.67 ** 0.50, 0.89 0.69 0.44, 1.08
Decision Maker of Visiting to Family/Relative
Independently 1.00 1.00 1.00
Jointly 0.53 *** 0.42, 0.68 0.95 0.64, 1.41 0.89 0.64, 1.26
Others 0.99 0.76, 1.29 1.54 * 1.01, 2.35 1.51 ** 1.11, 1.89
Decision Maker of spending Husband/Partner’s Earning
Independently 1.00 1.00 1.00
Jointly 0.56 *** 0.42, 0.75 0.94 0.65, 1.37 0.91 0.64, 1.31
Others 0.83 0.62, 1.13 1.00 0.69, 1.45 0.90 0.64, 1.29

1Univariable Logistic Regression Model,

2All Independent Variables are included into Fixed effect Multivariable Univariate Logistic Regression Model,

3Only Selected Variables are included into Fixed effect Multivariable Univariate Logistic Regression Model (Variables are selected by Backward Stepwise Selection Method and Estimates are calculated by bootstrapping),

4 * p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, 5 OR = Odds Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval.

Fig 4. Forest plot from showing the significant estimates from logistic regression model for help seeking in early stage.

Fig 4

Compared to women with no formal education, women who completed secondary or Higher education has shown 41% (aOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.07-1.87) and 55% (aOR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.04-2.28) higher odds of seeking help respectively. Women whose age gap with husband is between 6–10 years and more than 10 years have respectively 28% (aOR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.09-1.61) and 69% (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.34-2.14) increase in of help seeking over women whose age gap with husband is 0–5 years. Urban women have lower odds (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.61, 0.94) compared to Rural women. In contrast to Barishal, all other divisions have shown higher odds of help seeking but estimates from only Chattogram (aOR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.36-3.62), Khulna (aOR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.70-4.65) and Rajshahi (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.05-2.90) are statistically significant. Employed women who are either working for family members (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.21-1.79) or self-employed/work for others (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.52-3.07) have significantly higher odds of help seeking over housewives. There is no significant difference between Non-smartphone and Non users of mobile phone but Smartphone users have 34% lower odds (aOR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.46-0.88) of help seeking behavior compared to those who doesn’t have any mobile phone. Internet users have 2.04 times higher odds (95% CI = 1.52-2.75) of help seeking in contrast to women who never used internet. Frequency of watching television has no significant effect on the outcome. Comparing with sole decision maker women of their own healthcare, those who take decision jointly or whose decision is taken by others has lower odds of help seeking but only joint decision takers have 39% lower (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.45-0.83) odds which is statistically significant. Women from families where decision of family visits or visit to relative is taken by others have 1.51 times higher odds of seeking help which is statistically significant (95% CI = 1.11-1.89).

Discussion

Ours is the first ever study to explore such early-stage help-seeking behavior among the female population from nationally representative data with the target to explore proximal determinants and to investigate the current impact of media exposure on help-seeking behavior at mild to moderate anxiety and depressive stage.

We’ve found that about 8 out of ten women who experienced mild to moderate anxiety and depression didn’t seek any kind of help. Multiple studies on women of reproductive age, perinatal period also found extremely low proportion of help seeking women in Bangladesh as well [3941]. Studies suggest that limited awareness about mental health, widespread stigma around seeking help, and poor service availability, socio-cultural factors—like traditional beliefs, religious and social taboos further discourage care-seeking behavior [39,40]. But respondent’s religion didn’t showed any significant change in care seeking behavior in our study.

Our study revealed that almost half the women are educated below secondary level but women who are educated higher than that had showed higher tendency of help seeking for their experiences. The association of higher education and positive health is now unquestionable, prior studies established that benefit of higher education on women’s health is more impactful than it is on men’s [4246]. Though secondary education or higher showed significant increase in help seeking behavior, national curriculum of textbooks for primary, secondary and higher secondary education contain no information about basic concepts of mental health till 2022 which was a major barrier towards awareness buildup mental wellbeing [7,47]. With support of UNICEF Ministry of Education of Bangladesh has employed a new curriculum for secondary level only; from 2023 which includes frameworks, mandatory textbooks, and guides for teachers on mental health and wellbeing [48,49]. School-based curriculum containing mental health literacy in Tanzania, mental health package by WHO in Qatar, implementation of Canadian school mental health curriculum as guide in Malawi, “Mental Health & High School Curriculum Guide” (“The Guide”) in Vietnam and Cambodia have shown significant improvement in keeping positive mental health attitude and wellbeing for both teachers and students [5053].

60% of the women in our study are housewives and they were less likely to seek help in comparison with working women (working for any family members/Self-employed or working for others). Several studies have concluded that being a housewife has positive correlation with the negative mental health outcomes of women. Feeling overwhelmed and alone, they face rising anxiety which is driven by burnout, codependency, and how they see themselves [54,55]. Role of a housewife remains a deeply entrenched gender role, particularly in patriarchal societies, where women are expected to shoulder domestic responsibilities regardless of their employment status [56]. From an early age, societal norms condition women to adopt passive, emotional, obedient, and self-sacrificing behaviors—expectations that, once internalized, can profoundly diminish their sense of identity and self-worth within social interaction [57,58]. Study on housewives in India suggested that they were often pressured to prioritize the needs and expectations of others within their social environment [59]. Over time, this external focus can distort their sense of self, causing them to build a boundary within themselves, leading to a blurred identity and negative self-perception [60]. These reasons can be the explanation of why housewives in our study tend less seeking behavior. On the other hand, working women showed more concerned about their mental health, evidence from prior studies also support that working women had significantly better mental health [6163]. We found significantly lower odds of help seeking in urban women. Sociologists contend that urban life often comes at the cost of meaningful human connection. Compared to residents of small towns or rural areas, individuals in large cities tend to experience weaker, less personal relationships and a decline in the overall quality of social interactions [6466]. That results into urban dwellers are less likely than rural habitants to base their personal interactions on traditional links (such as family, relatives) [67]. Women from Khulna showed significantly higher tend of seeking help. We speculate this rise is because under the WHO initiative on urban governance for health and wellbeing, with leadership of the Mayor of Khulna City Corporation, a comprehensive four-year action plan has been formulated for the “Healthy City Khulna” initiative in 2020 [68]. The plan emphasizes the integration of health considerations into all policies, the promotion of healthy lifestyles including mental health issues [69].

Age difference with husband is founded to have significant impact on help seeking behavior of women in our study where older male-younger female marriages are the most common. This finding aligns with the finding from existing literature [70,71]. An Australian study indicated that couples with significant age differences tend to show lower resilience in managing challenges compared to couples who are closer in age [72]. This association reinforces a perspective prevalent in literature—that substantial age disparities in relationships are inherently negative to women’s well-being, as women in such relationships often have reduced decision-making power within the household and face a higher risk of experiencing domestic turmoil [73,74]. Thus they look for help for their experiences more.

Autonomy for making decision on their own healthcare played a crucial role as we found respondent who had to make a decision jointly with her husband showed lower odds of seeking help compared to who made the decision independently. Across various healthcare domains—including accessing care, utilizing services, and choosing treatment options—women’s autonomy is widely recognized as a critical component in effective decision-making [75]. In Pakistan, cultural norms often discourage women from making independent decisions, leading to reduced autonomy [76]. Additionally, other studies have highlighted that traditional expectations regarding women’s roles within the family vary across cultures, with many emphasizing the obligation for women have the right to share their opinion but must need to defer to their husbands in final decision-making processes [7779]. Similar result was also found in our study that 85% of women in Bangladesh doesn’t have the sole autonomy in their own healthcare decision. Previous research has indicated that empowering women to make autonomous decisions regarding their healthcare is associated with improved mental health outcomes, particularly in reducing levels of anxiety and lack of autonomy is linked to adverse outcomes, including poor mental health, reduced utilization of healthcare services, increased risk of malnutrition, and unmet family needs [80,81]. This explains why women who didn’t have sole autonomy in decision making for their healthcare exhibited lower tendency to seek help for their mental health.

We put special focus on the role of media exposure on help seeking behavior, as previously in Bangladesh, the media campaigns (like television advertisements, billboards, leaflets, Radio shows) have successfully brought revolution in creating public awareness about childhood Vitamin A Supplements, immunization, smoking behavior, non-communicable diseases and health care seeking behavior regarding stigmatized issues such as tuberculosis and AIDS [8287]. We found that the women who had access to the internet were more inclined towards seeking help while women owning a smartphone had a lower tendency to seek care when they faced the earlier symptoms of anxiety or depression. Stigma still looms large on women seeking mental healthcare from any facilities; many women often hide their symptoms to avoid getting shamed and judged [39]. Therefore, we assume access to the internet allows women to seek assistance for their mental health issues while ensuring privacy, convenience, and immediate access. Access to telehealth and online apps through the internet makes it easier in low-income settings or rural areas and among vulnerable populations to reach out to the help they need [88,89]. Women can share their experiences with professional caregivers or sometimes anonymously on different platforms while maintaining better control over their approach to finding help [89,90]. Moreover, mental health literacy (MHL) has been found to be higher among the participants using the internet, and increased professional help-seeking has been observed to be pursued by individuals with higher MHL, highlighting the significant relationship between mental health literacy and help-seeking behaviors [91,92]. This can also play as a contributing factor in higher mental health seeking tendencies among our participants during their early symptoms. All this evidence is suggestive of the fact that women with internet access are more aware and concerned, and have easy access to seek mental health care.

While an interesting finding has been observed in our study, that women with smartphones were less interested in seeking any help for their anxiety and depression. Report from a systematic review aligns with our findings that that 87% of its participants owned a mobile phone, but only 23% of them chose to use them as a means of asking for help [93]. The barriers that cause a lower number of help seekers include operational complexity and user engagement [94]. Furthermore, it has been reported that using a mobile phone has an initial ‘blanket effect’ that helps as an avoidance coping mechanism in the short run to moderately disengage from stressful and unpleasant emotional experiences [9597]. Another systematic review reported that many individuals will not even communicate with mental health professionals in person and prefer contacting via smartphones, indicating that smartphone actually helps people to seek care for those who will not even consider seeking care in person [98].

Despite its widespread reach, television exposure showed no significant association with help-seeking behavior in our analysis. This reveals a critical, yet very underutilized opportunity in the Bangladeshi context. Television remains a powerful and cost-effective medium for influencing health behaviors, with its reach and popularity offering immense potential for public health promotion [29,99,83]. Evidence showed that women who watched TV dramas were significantly more likely to visit health facilities and use modern contraceptives, highlighting the medium’s effectiveness—even within patriarchal and gender-constrained settings [30]. Despite the proven success of television in transforming several public health behaviors in Bangladesh, mental health remains absent from the outdated National Broadcast Policy (2014) of Bangladesh [100]. This situation is not just due to a missed opportunity; it’s due to policy gap as well. As mental health problems like anxiety and depression are becoming more common, especially among women & young people, this indicates a serious failure to use a media for public health promotion.

In general, people ignore the early signs and symptoms of illness, often avoiding professional help and instead relying on personal beliefs, cultural norms, or stigma-driven assumptions and often socially determined [101,102] In Bangladesh, this situation is more prominent [103,104]. Health conditions are frequently misunderstood or minimized due to low health literacy, widespread stigma, and a tendency to attribute illness to fate, spiritual causes, or bad luck [105110]. Many individuals opt for self-treatment, traditional healers, or home remedies rather than visiting a healthcare provider, partly due to financial constraints, mistrust in the healthcare system, or a deep-rooted belief that symptoms will resolve on their own [111113]. This also results into overall low proportion of help seeking behavior in case of mental health as well.

Conclusion

This study enlightens a critical yet neglected side, the alarmingly low levels of help-seeking behavior among women experiencing early-stage anxiety and depression in Bangladesh, revealing a pattern influenced by their working status, education level, autonomy, and media exposure. Housewives are among the most vulnerable groups to mental distress in Bangladesh, yet they are also the least likely to seek help—a critical reality that demands urgent, multisectoral action. Among all factors, Media Exposure is one of the most powerful factors, but Television remains as a underutilized tool for mental health transformation till now. It remains absent in the country’s mental health strategy, and is yet to be mobilized for mental health awareness and promotion programs. This omission represents not just a missed opportunity, but a serious blind spot.

Recommendations

1. Leverage television for mass mental health promotion

Given television’s deep penetration in grassroot level of the society, national mental health promotion campaigns using TV dramas, public service announcements, and entertainment-education formats should be urgently prioritized as well with the strategies that have been undertaken to utilize smartphone-, internet-based mental health service and promotion. Mental health literacy can be embedded within popular and culturally relatable programming to reduce stigma, encourage early help-seeking, and normalize conversations about mental well-being in underdeveloped regions where scarcity of modern technology such as (Smartphone, Internet) is inaccessible. Evaluating the effectiveness of currently aired-programs should be assessed thoroughly to ensure that mass media serves its intended educational and social functions. Continuous assessment and adaptation are also necessary to enhance the impact of these programs to make these more relevant and beneficial to the target population.

2. Train housewives as peer counselors

Evidence from diverse low-resource settings has demonstrated that peer counseling by laywomen can effectively improve health behaviors and psychosocial outcomes, particularly when rooted in shared lived experiences and community trust [114117]. Training housewives as peer counselors can capitalize on existing community trust and shared lived experiences to offer emotional first aid. This approach should help reduce shame, build trust, and encourage women to seek support for mental health issues in a safe and familiar environment. Feasibility of such intervention needs urgent exploration. Such peer-based interventions can be particularly effective in contexts where formal mental health services are scarce, making it both a scalable and culturally sensitive strategy according to the needs of communities.

3. Promote shared domestic responsibilities and autonomy-supportive policies

Empirical evidence consistently indicates that equitable distribution of household and cognitive tasks, alongside supportive policies to recognize and enable women’s autonomy, leads to improved decision-making power, psychological well-being, and health-seeking behaviors among housewives [118121]. Shared domestic responsibilities and support policies that give housewives more autonomy, time for self-care, and recognition beyond their household roles should be heavily promoted to turn housewives’ unrecognized labor into visible power and give them the respect they deserve. By shifting the narrative from “household duty” to “shared responsibility”, a culture can be created where women’s contributions, inside and outside the home, are celebrated as integral to societal well-being and development.

4. Thoroughly integrate mental health education into the national curriculum

Embedding comprehensive mental health and well-being education into the national school curriculum; from early grades through higher education; can help normalize mental health discussions from a young age. This initiative should aim to build resilience, emotional literacy, and help-seeking behaviors before individuals transition into domestic or workforce responsibilities. While this requires substantial coordination between education and health sectors, its long-term impact on generational attitudes toward mental health is considerable.

5. Support through policy and cross-sector collaboration

To ensure the longevity and structural integration of these initiatives, robust government policies must provide institutional support. Partnerships between government, NGOs, public and private sectors can enhance reach and innovation, while collaboration with mental health professionals ensures the ethical and effective delivery of interventions. Such cross-sectoral alignment is critical to embedding these recommendations within a sustainable, national mental health strategy.

Future scope

Future research should be strategically embedded within the broader vision of a national mental health strategy that prioritizes scalable, culturally relevant, and community-anchored solutions. A key area of investigation involves assessing the feasibility of developing television-based mental health interventions such as awareness campaigns, entertainment-education formats, and public service announcements that are culturally tailored to reduce stigma and promote early help-seeking behaviors. Such interventions must be rigorously evaluated using experimental designs, or where feasible, natural experimental approaches to measure both effectiveness and contextual fit. Full-scale trials should also assess long-term behavioral impact, cost-effectiveness, and potential for national scalability. Importantly, this line of research should not be pursued in isolation. It must be complemented by parallel efforts to train lay peer counselors, reform educational curricula, and advocate for gender-equitable support policies, all contributing to a cohesive, multisectoral national mental health framework. These research endeavors can also inform similar strategies in other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), positioning Bangladesh as a model for localized, media-driven, self-supported mental health help delivery and promotion.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Assumption Assessment of the Initial Model before Bootstrapping.

(TIF)

pmen.0000420.s001.tif (1.1MB, tif)
S1 File. Supporting Information (Analysis Pathway, and Interpolation).

(DOCX)

pmen.0000420.s002.docx (1.5MB, docx)
S2 Fig. Cluster-wise Proportion of Women Sought for Help in Early Stage of Depression and Anxiety.

(TIF)

pmen.0000420.s003.tif (1.5MB, tif)

Abbreviations

FY

Fiscal Year

BDHS

Bangladesh Demographic and Household Survey

PHQ

Patient Health Questionnaire

GAD

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

LMIC

Low Middle Income Country

LDC

Least Developed Country

Data Availability

Original Dataset, RScript for extracting test-ready dataset and the csv format of test ready dataset can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29834708.v1.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Comprehensive mental health action plan 2013-2030. 1st ed. World Health Organization. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National Academies of Sciences E, Division H, M, Services B on HC, Treatment C on IDMCL to I. Selected health conditions and likelihood of improvement with treatment. National Academies Press (US). 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mental Health Disorders - Selected Health Conditions and Likelihood of Improvement with Treatment. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559510/ [PubMed]
  • 4.Beames JR, Kikas K, Werner-Seidler A. Prevention and early intervention of depression in young people: an integrated narrative review of affective awareness and Ecological Momentary Assessment. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00614-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ormel J, Kessler RC, Schoevers R. Depression: more treatment but no drop in prevalence: how effective is treatment? And can we do better? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019;32(4):348–54. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Zoonen K, Buntrock C, Ebert DD, Smit F, Reynolds CF 3rd, Beekman ATF, et al. Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder: a meta-analytic review of psychological interventions. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(2):318–29. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.WHO special initiative country report - Bangladesh - 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/mental-health/special-initiative/who-special-initiative-country-report---bangladesh---2020.pdf?sfvrsn=c2122a0e_2
  • 8.Hasan MT, Anwar T, Christopher E, Hossain S, Hossain MM, Koly KN, et al. The current state of mental healthcare in Bangladesh: part 1 - an updated country profile. BJPsych Int. 2021;18(4):78–82. doi: 10.1192/bji.2021.41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hossain SJ, Roy BR, Hossain AT, Mehrin F, Tipu SMMU, Tofail F, et al. Prevalence of Maternal Postpartum Depression, Health-Seeking Behavior and Out of Pocket Payment for Physical Illness and Cost Coping Mechanism of the Poor Families in Bangladesh: A Rural Community-Based Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Islam A. Mental Health and the Health System in Bangladesh: Situation Analysis of a Neglected Domain. AJPN. 2015;3(4):57. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpn.20150304.11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Selim N. Cultural dimensions of depression in Bangladesh: a qualitative study in two villages of Matlab. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010;28(1):95–106. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v28i1.4528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Teja JS, Narang RL, Aggarwal AK. Depression across cultures. Br J Psychiatry. 1971;119(550):253–60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.119.550.253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Farooq S, Gahir MS, Okyere E, Sheikh AJ, Oyebode F. Somatization: a transcultural study. J Psychosom Res. 1995;39(7):883–8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00034-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bashar M, Ahmed K, Uddin MS, Ahmed F, Emran A, Chakraborty A. Depression and Quality of Life among Postmenopausal Women in Bangladesh: A Cross-sectional Study. J Menopausal Med. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Akter M. Socio-economic barriers against women equal right in the society (a case of Bangladesh).
  • 16.Jayachandran S. The Roots of Gender Inequality in Developing Countries. Annu Rev Econ. 2015;7(1):63–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115404 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gender inequality in Africa: A re-examination of. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2343674643?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
  • 18.Nakamura-Taira N, Izawa S, Yamada KC. Stress underestimation and mental health literacy of depression in Japanese workers: A cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Res. 2018;262:221–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Collins B, Downing J, Head A, Cornerford T, Nathan R, Barr B. Investigating the impact of undiagnosed anxiety and depression on health and social care costs and quality of life: cross-sectional study using household health survey data. B J Psych Open. 2023;9(6):e201. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Anis F, White J. The Meena Communicative Initiative in Bangladesh. In: Plows V, Whitburn B, eds. Inclusive Education: Making Sense of Everyday Practice. SensePublishers; 2017:61–76. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6300-866-2_5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meena and UNICEF | UNICEF Bangladesh. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/bangladesh/en/meena-and-unicef
  • 22.Rahman MS, Rahman ML. Media and education play a tremendous role in mounting AIDS awareness among married couples in Bangladesh. AIDS Res Ther. 2007;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-4-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Improvement R, Practice B, Medicine I. The power of television and film. Communicating to advance the public’s health: Workshop summary. National Academies Press (US). 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.(PDF) Role of mass media in disseminating knowledge about Tuberculosis among the attendants accompanying patients of a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh. ResearchGate. doi:10.3329/nimcj.v11i2.54062 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mishra SR, Adhikari S, Khanal V. Role of mass media on knowledge generation and countering misconceptions about tuberculosis transmission in Nepal. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2014;4:S610–5. doi: 10.12980/apjtb.4.2014apjtb-2014-0110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Das DK, Khajanchi S, Kar TK. The impact of the media awareness and optimal strategy on the prevalence of tuberculosis. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2020;366:124732. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.124732 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gelaye KA, Debalkie G, Ayele TA, Wami SD, Sisay MM, Fetene D, et al. The role of mass media exposure on tuberculosis knowledge and attitude among migrant and seasonal farmworkers in Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05316-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anochie PI, Onyeneke EC, Onyeozirila AC, Igbolekwu LC, Onyeneke BC, Ogu AC. Evaluation of public awareness and attitude to pulmonary tuberculosis in a Nigerian rural community. Germs. 2013;3(2):52–62. doi: 10.11599/germs.2013.1037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Elkamel F. The use of television series in health education. Health Educ Res. 1995;10(2):225–32. doi: 10.1093/her/10.2.225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khan NN. Entertainment-Education as Public Health Tools in Changing Health Behavior: Global Applications and an Example of Popular TV Drama in Bangladesh. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/32318664/Entertainment_Education_as_public_health_tools_in_changing_health_behavior_global_applications_and_an_example_of_popular_TV_drama_in_Bangladesh
  • 31.Albert PR. Why is depression more prevalent in women? J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015;40(4):219–21. doi: 10.1503/jpn.150205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McLean CP, Asnaani A, Litz BT, Hofmann SG. Gender differences in anxiety disorders: prevalence, course of illness, comorbidity and burden of illness. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(8):1027–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mental health. https://www.healthdata.org/research-analysis/health-risks-issues/mental-health
  • 34.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD Compare. Available from: http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare
  • 35.Analyzing DHS Data. Available from: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/Guide-to-DHS-Statistics/Analyzing_DHS_Data.htm
  • 36.Guide to DHS Statistics. Available from: https://www.dhsprogram.com/Data/Guide-to-DHS-Statistics/index.cfm
  • 37.Instructions for Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) and GAD-7 Measures. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Instructions-for-Patient-Health-Questionnaire-(PHQ)/7f8c92d4001b8e351d5d395281061080de38c7fe
  • 38.Halperin SJ, Henderson MN, Prenner S, Grauer JN. Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression Among Medical Students During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021;8. doi: 10.1177/2382120521991150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koly KN, Tasnim Z, Ahmed S, Saba J, Mahmood R, Farin FT, et al. Mental healthcare-seeking behavior of women in Bangladesh: content analysis of a social media platform. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04414-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dutta GK, Sarker BK, Ahmed HU, Bhattacharyya DS, Rahman MM, Majumder R, et al. Mental healthcare-seeking behavior during the perinatal period among women in rural Bangladesh. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07678-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Raza S, Banik R, Noor STA, Sayeed A, Saha A, Jahan E, et al. Anxiety and depression among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh: burden, determinants, and care-seeking practices based on a nationally representative demographic and health survey. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00737-025-01564-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ross CE, Mirowsky J. gender and the health benefits of education. Sociol Q. 2010;51(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01164.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zajacova A, Lawrence EM. The Relationship Between Education and Health: Reducing Disparities Through a Contextual Approach. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:273–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.The Lancet Public Health. Education: a neglected social determinant of health. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(7):e361. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30144-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Raghupathi V, Raghupathi W. The influence of education on health: an empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995-2015. Arch Public Health. 2020;78:20. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00402-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.(PDF) Impact of Women’s Education on their Health Conditions - An Overview. ResearchGate. doi: 10.22192/ijamr.2022.09.09.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Uddin MS. Mental health content in school science textbooks in Bangladesh. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):e10. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30008-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.UNICEF. Improving students’ mental health in Bangladesh. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/documents/improving-students-mental-health-bangladesh
  • 49.DSHE Newsletter May 2023_compressed. Available from: https://dshe.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dshe.portal.gov.bd/notices/96276bd4_7996_4a01_92f5_8699dd6e74f3/DSHE%20Newsletter%20May%202023_compressed.pdf
  • 50.Kutcher S, Wei Y, Gilberds H, Ubuguyu O, Njau T, Brown A, et al. A school mental health literacy curriculum resource training approach: effects on Tanzanian teachers’ mental health knowledge, stigma and help-seeking efficacy. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016;10:50. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0082-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Elyamani R, Nour O, Singh R, Saeed K, Musa A, Alkubaisi N, et al. The effectiveness of the WHO school mental health package in promoting mental health literacy among secondary school teachers in Qatar: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1883. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19263-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kutcher S, Gilberds H, Morgan C, Greene R, Hamwaka K, Perkins K. Improving Malawian teachers’ mental health knowledge and attitudes: an integrated school mental health literacy approach. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2015;2:e1. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2014.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nguyen AJ, Dang H-M, Bui D, Phoeun B, Weiss B. Experimental evaluation of a school-based mental health literacy program in two Southeast Asian nations. School Ment Health. 2020;12(4):716–31. doi: 10.1007/s12310-020-09379-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Durak M, Senol-Durak E, Karakose S. Psychological Distress and Anxiety among Housewives: The Mediational Role of Perceived Stress, Loneliness, and Housewife Burnout. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(17):14517–14528. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02636-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kaplan V. Mental Health States of Housewives: an Evaluation in Terms of Self-perception and Codependency. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2023;21(1):666–83. doi: 10.1007/s11469-022-00910-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Families and the labour market, UK. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/articles/familiesandthelabourmarketengland/2019
  • 57.Soylu Y. Predicting marital adjustment according to empathic tendency, communication and conflict resolution styles. Turk Psychol Couns Guid J. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Becoming a mother after infertility: A theoretical analysis. Psikiyatr G252ncel Yaklaşımlar. 2018;10(4):496–511. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Malhotra S, Shah R. Women and mental health in India: An overview. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57(Suppl 2):S205-11. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.161479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ozcan H, Subasi B, Budak B, Celik M, Gurel S, Yildiz M. Relationship between self-esteem, social appearence anxiety, depression and anxiety in adolescent and young adult women. JMOOD. 2013;3(3):107. doi: 10.5455/jmood.20130507015148 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lu Z, Yan S, Jones J, He Y, She Q. From Housewives to Employees, the Mental Benefits of Employment across Women with Different Gender Role Attitudes and Parenthood Status. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):4364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jahoda M. Employment and unemployment. Camb Books. 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fryer D. Employment deprivation and personal agency during unemployment: A critical discussion of Jahoda’s explanation of the psychological effects of unemployment. Soc Behav. 1986;1(1):3–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Blien U, Suedekum J, Wolf K. Local employment growth in West Germany: A dynamic panel approach. Labour Economics. 2006;13(4):445–58. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2006.02.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Brueckner JK, Largey AG. Social interaction and urban sprawl. Journal of Urban Economics. 2008;64(1):18–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.08.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Abshire DA, Graves JM, Amiri S, Williams-Gilbert W. Differences in Loneliness Across the Rural-Urban Continuum Among Adults Living in Washington State. J Rural Health. 2022;38(1):187–93. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sato Y, Zenou Y. How urbanization affect employment and social interactions. European Economic Review. 2015;75:131–55. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.01.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Khulna, Bangladesh. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/urban-governance-for-health-and-well-being/work-in-cities-khulna-bangladesh
  • 69.Organization WH. Healthy Cities Effective Approach to a Rapidly Changing World. World Health Organization. 2020. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/331946 [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Berardo FM, Appel J, Berardo DH. Age dissimilar marriages: Review and assessment. Journal of Aging Studies. 1993;7(1):93–106. doi: 10.1016/0890-4065(93)90026-g [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Age differences between spouses: sociodemographic variation and selection. Available from: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000445839300002
  • 72.Lee W-S, McKinnish T. The Marital Satisfaction of Differently Aged Couples. J Popul Econ. 2018;31(2):337–62. doi: 10.1007/s00148-017-0658-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jensen R, Thornton R. Early female marriage in the developing world. Gender & Development. 2003;11(2):9–19. doi: 10.1080/741954311 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Raj A, Boehmer U. Girl child marriage and its association with national rates of HIV, maternal health, and infant mortality across 97 countries. Violence Against Women. 2013;19(4):536–51. doi: 10.1177/1077801213487747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Idris IB, Hamis AA, Bukhori ABM, Hoong DCC, Yusop H, Shaharuddin MA-A, et al. Women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02792-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ahmed S, Jafri H, Rashid Y, Yi H, Dong D, Zhu J. Autonomous decision-making for antenatal screening in Pakistan: views held by women, men and health professionals in a low-middle income country. Eur J Hum Genet EJHG. 2019;27(6):848–56. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0353-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Osamor PE, Grady C. Women’s autonomy in health care decision-making in developing countries: a synthesis of the literature. Int J Womens Health. 2016;8:191–202. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S105483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Amraeni Y, Kamso S, Prasetyo SB, Nirwan M. A matriarchal and patriarchal perception on women’s autonomy in decision making on contraception: qualitative analysis in Indonesia. Malays J Med Health Sci. 2021;17:17–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Alemayehu M, Meskele M. Health care decision making autonomy of women from rural districts of Southern Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:213–21. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S131139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Couva M, Talias MA, Christou M, Soteriades ES. Women’s Empowerment and Health: A Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024;21(12):1614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(3):277–82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Asaduzzaman M, Higuchi M, Sarker MAB, Hamajima N. Awareness and knowledge of HIV/AIDS among married women in rural Bangladesh and exposure to media: a secondary data analysis of the 2011 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2016;78(1):109–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tabassum R, Froeschl G, Cruz JP, Colet PC, Dey S, Islam SMS. Untapped aspects of mass media campaigns for changing health behaviour towards non-communicable diseases in Bangladesh. Global Health. 2018;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0325-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Randolph W, Viswanath K. Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: marketing health in a crowded media world. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:419–37. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376(9748):1261–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wakefield M, Bayly M, Durkin S, Cotter T, Mullin S, Warne C, et al. Smokers’ responses to television advertisements about the serious harms of tobacco use: pre-testing results from 10 low- to middle-income countries. Tob Control. 2013;22(1):24–31. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Begum R. Vitamin A knowledge and household consumption frequency of vitamin A – rich foods in Tangail, Bangladesh. Malays J Nutr. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Miralles I, Granell C, Díaz-Sanahuja L, Van Woensel W, Bretón-López J, Mira A, et al. Smartphone Apps for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(4):e14897. doi: 10.2196/14897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Almuqrin A, Hammoud R, Terbagou I, Tognin S, Mechelli A. Smartphone apps for mental health: systematic review of the literature and five recommendations for clinical translation. BMJ Open. 2025;15(2):e093932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pretorius C, Chambers D, Coyle D. Young People’s Online Help-Seeking and Mental Health Difficulties: Systematic Narrative Review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(11):e13873. doi: 10.2196/13873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Baklola M, Terra M, Taha A, Elnemr M, Yaseen M, Maher A, et al. Mental health literacy and help-seeking behaviour among Egyptian undergraduates: a cross-sectional national study. BMC Psychiatry. 2024;24(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05620-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Lawlor. Mental health literacy among internet users. Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2008.00085.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Guracho YD, Thomas SJ, Win KT. Smartphone application use patterns for mental health disorders: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform. 2023;179:105217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kim SK, Lee M, Jeong H, Jang YM. Effectiveness of mobile applications for patients with severe mental illness: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Japan Journal Nursing Sci. 2022;19(3). doi: 10.1111/jjns.12476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Panova T, Lleras A. Avoidance or boredom: Negative mental health outcomes associated with use of Information and Communication Technologies depend on users’ motivations. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;58:249–58. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.062 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhang J, Wang E. Indulging in Smartphones in Times of Stress: A Moderated Mediation Model of Experiential Avoidance and Trait Mindfulness. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022;12(12):485. doi: 10.3390/bs12120485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Pressman S. The use of smartphones as a digital security blanket: The influence of phone use and availability on psychological and physiological responses to social exclusion. Psychosom Med. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hind J, Sibbald SL. Smartphone Applications for Mental Health—A Rapid Review. WURJ:HNS. 2014;5(1). doi: 10.5206/wurjhns.2014-15.16 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Rahman M, Curtis SL, Chakraborty N, Jamil K. Women’s television watching and reproductive health behavior in Bangladesh. SSM Popul Health. 2017;3:525–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.National Broadcasting Policy. Available from: https://moi.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/moi.portal.gov.bd/files/a22f434a_b3f5_4931_be15_7a56494fb8df/National_Broadcasting_Policy.pdf
  • 101.Hamiduzzaman M, De Bellis A, Abigail W, Kalaitzidis E, Harrington A. The World Is Not Mine - Barriers to Healthcare Access for Bangladeshi Rural Elderly Women. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2021;36(1):69–89. doi: 10.1007/s10823-020-09420-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Carter P, Megnin-Viggars O, Rubin GJ. What Factors Influence Symptom Reporting and Access to Healthcare During an Emerging Infectious Disease Outbreak? A Rapid Review of the Evidence. Health Secur. 2021;19(4):353–63. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kabir A, Karim MN, Billah B. Self-reported health complaints and healthcare-seeking behaviour among adult people in rural Bangladesh: results from a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2025;15(2):e086324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Sharma D, Montaha S, Bashar MFB, Rahman MS. Challenges and opportunities in pharmacovigilance implementation in Bangladesh: A review of reporting systems, awareness, and regulatory frameworks. IJPS J. 2025. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14786275 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zhong S-L, Wang S-B, Ding K-R, Tan W-Y, Zhou L. Low mental health literacy is associated with depression and anxiety among adults: a population-based survey of 16,715 adults in China. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2721. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20020-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Oexle N, Müller M, Kawohl W, Xu Z, Viering S, Wyss C, et al. Self-stigma as a barrier to recovery: a longitudinal study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018;268(2):209–12. doi: 10.1007/s00406-017-0773-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mbuthia JW, Kumar M, Falkenström F, Kuria MW, Othieno CJ. Attributions and private theories of mental illness among young adults seeking psychiatric treatment in Nairobi: an interpretive phenomenological analysis. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2018;12:28. doi: 10.1186/s13034-018-0229-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Fu J, Zhao Y, Feng X, Wang Y, Yu Z, Hua L, et al. How is fatalistic determinism linked to depression? The mediating role of self-control and resilience. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;180:110992. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110992 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lasikiewicz. The effect of superstitious thinking on psychosocial stress responses and perceived task performance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Mental illness stigma in Bangladesh: findings from a cross-sectional survey. Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Efficacy, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of self-help interventions for anxiety disorders: systematic review - PubMed. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22215865/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 112.Haque MI, Chowdhury ABMA, Shahjahan M, Harun MGD. Traditional healing practices in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative investigation. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2129-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Al-Krenawi A. The Impact of Cultural Beliefs on Mental Health Diagnosis and Treatment. Advances in Mental Health and Addiction. Springer International Publishing. 2019:149–65. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-26437-6_9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Topping KJ. Peer Education and Peer Counselling for Health and Well-Being: A Review of Reviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6064. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Bolton P, Bass J, Neugebauer R, Verdeli H, Clougherty KF, Wickramaratne P, et al. Group interpersonal psychotherapy for depression in rural Uganda: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(23):3117–24. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ara G, Khanam M, Papri N, Nahar B, Haque MA, Kabir I, et al. Peer counselling improves breastfeeding practices: A cluster randomized controlled trial in urban Bangladesh. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(3):e12605. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kaaya S, Siril H, Fawzi MCS, Aloyce Z, Araya R, Kaale A, et al. A peer-facilitated psychological group intervention for perinatal women living with HIV and depression in Tanzania-Healthy Options: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2022;19(12):e1004112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Olwanda E, Opondo K, Oluoch D, Croke K, Maluni J, Jepkosgei J, et al. Women’s autonomy and maternal health decision making in Kenya: implications for service delivery reform - a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02965-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zegeye B, Idriss-Wheeler D, Ahinkorah BO, Ameyaw EK, Seidu A-A, Adjei NK, et al. Association between women’s household decision-making autonomy and health insurance enrollment in sub-saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15434-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.The impact of household structure on female autonomy in developing countries. The Journal of Development Studies. 51(5). [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Kumar N, Quisumbing A, Manohar S, Banerjee A, Gupta S, Chauhan A, et al. Intrahousehold dynamics in South Asia: understanding the relationships among women’s empowerment, task sharing, women’s decision making, and diets. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. 2025. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.08.25320196 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Ment Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000420.r001

Decision Letter 0

Lambert Zixin Li

5 Aug 2025

PMEN-D-25-00281

Determinants of Early Help-Seeking Behavior for Mental Distress Among Women in Bangladesh: A Bootstrapped Logistic Regression Analysis of Nationally Representative Survey Data

PLOS Mental Health

Dear Dr. Ahmed,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Mental Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Mental Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 19 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at mentalhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pmen/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Lambert Zixin Li, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Mental Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please provide separate figure files in .tif or .eps format.

For more information about figure files please see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/s/figures

https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/s/figures#loc-file-requirements

2. We have amended your Competing Interest statement to comply with journal style. We kindly ask that you double check the statement and let us know if anything is incorrect.

3. If you did not receive any funding for this study, please simply state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

4. Thank you for uploading your study's underlying data set. Unfortunately, the repository you have noted in your Data Availability statement does not qualify as an acceptable data repository according to PLOS's standards.

At this time, please upload the minimal data set necessary to replicate your study's findings to a stable, public repository (such as figshare or Dryad) and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. For a list of recommended repositories and additional information on PLOS standards for data deposition, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

5. Some material included in your submission may be copyrighted. According to PLOS’s copyright policy, authors who use figures or other material (e.g., graphics, clipart, maps) from another author or copyright holder must demonstrate or obtain permission to publish this material under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License used by PLOS journals. Please closely review the details of PLOS’s copyright requirements here: PLOS Licenses and Copyright. If you need to request permissions from a copyright holder, you may use PLOS's Copyright Content Permission form.

Please respond directly to this email or email the journal office and provide any known details concerning your material's license terms and permissions required for reuse, even if you have not yet obtained copyright permissions or are unsure of your material's copyright compatibility.

Potential Copyright Issues: Figure 3: please (a) provide a direct link to the base layer of the map (i.e., the country or region border shape) and ensure this is also included in the figure legend; and (b) provide a link to the terms of use / license information for the base layer image or shapefile. We cannot publish proprietary or copyrighted maps (e.g. Google Maps, Mapquest) and the terms of use for your map base layer must be compatible with our CC-BY 4.0 license.

Note: if you created the map in a software program like R or ArcGIS, please locate and indicate the source of the basemap shapefile onto which data has been plotted.

If your map was obtained from a copyrighted source please amend the figure so that the base map used is from an openly available source. Alternatively, please provide explicit written permission from the copyright holder granting you the right to publish the material under our CC-BY 4.0 license.

Please note that the following CC BY licenses are compatible with PLOS license: CC BY 4.0, CC BY 2.0 and CC BY 3.0, meanwhile such licenses as CC BY-ND 3.0 and others are not compatible due to additional restrictions.

If you are unsure whether you can use a map or not, please do reach out and we will be able to help you. The following websites are good examples of where you can source open access or public domain maps:

* U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) - All maps are in the public domain. (http://www.usgs.gov)

* PlaniGlobe - All maps are published under a Creative Commons license so please cite “PlaniGlobe, http://www.planiglobe.com, CC BY 2.0” in the image credit after the caption. (http://www.planiglobe.com/?lang=enl)

* Natural Earth - All maps are public domain. (http://www.naturalearthdata.com/about/terms-of-use/)

6. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Dear Authors,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Mental Health. After review, we invite you to submit a revised version addressing the comments provided by the reviewers.

While your study shows potential, the reviewers have identified several areas that require clarification or improvement. Please submit a point-by-point response detailing how each comment has been addressed, along with a revised version of the manuscript.

We look forward to receiving your revision.

Sincerely,

Lambert Zixin Li, PhD

PLOS Mental Health

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

-->Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Mental Health’s publication criteria ? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Mental Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.-->

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

-->5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)-->

Reviewer #1: Timely and policy-relevant topic in global mental health, particularly among women in LMICs.

To strengthen this manuscript further:

1. Title is accurate but long. Suggest trimming for clarity “Determinants of Early Mental Health Help-Seeking Among Women in Bangladesh: A Nationally Representative Analysis”

2. Abstract: Results can be grouped more concisely, too many aORs may overwhelm readers.

3. Introduction:

a. Some sentences are long and could be broken into simpler, clearer statements (e.g., lines 54-57, 281-283 and 396-399).

b. Consider avoiding repetition (e.g., lines 48–57 and 63–66 discuss the burden and importance of early intervention similarly).

4. Methods:

a. Clarify “bootstrapped fixed-effects logistic regression” for general readers. Are the strata treated as fixed intercepts?

b. Variable selection process ("backward stepwise") is clear but could benefit from a brief note on why it was preferred over LASSO or AIC-based selection.

c. Although the manuscript refers to several figures, they are not embedded in the main text. While the figures have been provided as supplementary files, their resolution is too low to interpret the content effectively.

5. Results:

a. Clarify the contrast between “Smartphone users” vs. “Internet users”. This is nuanced but may confuse some readers.

b. Consider summarizing key findings in a sentence or two before launching into detailed odds ratios.

c. Group related predictors (e.g., all autonomy-related ones) to reduce the density of Table 03.

6. Discussion: Some sections lean toward advocacy without adequate empirical support. For instance, the suggestion to train housewives as peer counselors (lines 412–414) is conceptually valuable but would benefit from supporting evidence or citations. Similar concerns apply to the strong recommendations presented in lines 399–403 and 414–416, which would be more compelling if grounded in existing research or programmatic examples.

7. Policy and practice implications:

a. Consider prioritizing recommendations in order of impact and feasibility.

b. Frame future research as part of a broader national mental health strategy.

8. Capitalization has been used unnecessarily within sentences, for example, in phrases like “Strata,” “Smartphone,” “Internet,” “Newspaper/Magazine,” “Radio,” “Television,” “Age,” “Education Level,” “Occupation,” “Marital Status,” “Religion,” and “Media Exposure”, which disrupts consistency and proper grammar.

Reviewer #2: This is a well designed study that promotes gender equity and inclusion in design of mental health programmes in resource poor settings. It was observed that 92.4% of respondents were in a particular religious inclination and therefore it may be difficult to analyse the influence of religion on the care seeking behaviour of these women. In subsequent studies, the authors may wish to consider exploring the role of religion on their study outcomes or possibly compare their findings with those of women from other socio-cultural (religious) settings. This is an important factor that the authors may wish to consider.

**********

-->6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .-->

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Ment Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000420.r003

Decision Letter 1

Lambert Zixin Li

20 Aug 2025

Determinants of Early Mental Health Help-Seeking Among Women in Bangladesh: A Nationally Representative Bootstrapped Regression Analysis

PMEN-D-25-00281R1

Dear Dr Ahmed,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Determinants of Early Mental Health Help-Seeking Among Women in Bangladesh: A Nationally Representative Bootstrapped Regression Analysis' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Mental Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact mentalhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Mental Health.

Best regards,

Lambert Zixin Li, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Mental Health

***********************************************************

Thank you for thoroughly addressing all reviewer comments. I have carefully reviewed the revised manuscript, your response letter, and the highlighted changes. I find that the paper is of publishable quality.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Assumption Assessment of the Initial Model before Bootstrapping.

    (TIF)

    pmen.0000420.s001.tif (1.1MB, tif)
    S1 File. Supporting Information (Analysis Pathway, and Interpolation).

    (DOCX)

    pmen.0000420.s002.docx (1.5MB, docx)
    S2 Fig. Cluster-wise Proportion of Women Sought for Help in Early Stage of Depression and Anxiety.

    (TIF)

    pmen.0000420.s003.tif (1.5MB, tif)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pmen.0000420.s005.docx (166.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    Original Dataset, RScript for extracting test-ready dataset and the csv format of test ready dataset can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29834708.v1.


    Articles from PLOS Mental Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES